Hello Paul,
On 10/25/20 9:15 PM, Paul Geurts wrote:
has any of you see this behauvior? I think there is no use in putting a
Right, there is no point in doing that. Usually such DDoS last a few
hours max.
relay behind a ddos filter, or is there? In that case I'll just spin up
another one.
Hello again,
if you setup Fail2ban or similar, please make sure it does not send out
abuse emails, Fail2ban-Spam or similar is alot of work for Tor Exit
operators.
Regards
yl
On 9/21/20 11:19 AM, Андрей Гвоздев wrote:
> Hello
> I'm running a TOR relay, every time I SSH to my server I see a messa
On 9/21/20 11:19 AM, Андрей Гвоздев wrote:
> I'm running a TOR relay, every time I SSH to my server I see a message
> that there were thousands of failed login attempts
> Do you see this message too?
I think this is quite normal, for any server, if you do not run any
service that blocks IPs afte
Hello Roger
On 5/1/20 12:15 AM, Roger Dingledine wrote:
> My first question would be whether the relay has an IPv6 ORPort, because
> maybe that address became unreachable.
Thanks for this question. This was it it seems. Still I can't see any
problem and am not able to find the reason, but this n
Hello Marco
On 4/17/20 11:32 AM, li...@for-privacy.net wrote:
> On 17.04.2020 11:05, i forget:
>> On 17.04.2020 10:03, ylms wrote:
>>> ORPort 443
>> + ORPort [YOUR:V6:IP]:443
So I should use ORPort twice, once for IPv4 and once for IPv6?
What is the option &qu
Hello all
I just set up a bridge and want to make sure I didn't forget anything.
//the torrc I use
Nickname FancyNick
ContactInfo see https://example.com/torcontact/
ControlPort 9051
ORPort 443
SocksPort 0
BridgeRelay 1
ServerTransportPlugin obfs4 exec /usr/bin/obfs4proxy
ServerTransportListenA
Hello Roger
On 4/8/20 10:53 AM, Roger Dingledine wrote:
> Notice-level logs are a fine default. They should include everything
> that's important for you to hear about, but also they try hard not to
> include sensitive information.
>
> See this item from the old faq, which didn't get migrated to
Hello Teor
On 4/7/20 11:24 PM, teor wrote:
> Hi,
>
>> On 7 Apr 2020, at 21:34, ylms wrote:
>>
>> As written above, I run an Exit (for many years, with the current setup
>> since 04.2019) but on 30. March 2020 it stopped, I was unable to
>> determine any reas
t 4
MB/sec, not very much.
Regards
yl
On 4/7/20 12:37 PM, ylms wrote:
> Hello all
> As written above, I run an Exit (for many years, with the current setup
> since 04.2019) but on 30. March 2020 it stopped, I was unable to
> determine any reason.
> So I installed updates and sin
Hello all
As written above, I run an Exit (for many years, with the current setup
since 04.2019) but on 30. March 2020 it stopped, I was unable to
determine any reason.
So I installed updates and since there were some Kernel updates I also
rebooted the machine. The Exit was back up and ran again ti
On 2/12/20 5:28 AM, skarz wrote:
> 70 Mbps isn’t fast enough for Tor?
I'd say it is not fast enough for Tor, we did some tests with a
Raspberry Pi4 lately, these can utilize close to 100 MBit/s.
You could just try it, the Debian repository should provide the correct
version for the processor ar
ds
>> yl
>>
>>
>> Am 7. Januar 2020 19:12:46 MEZ schrieb "Toralf Förster"
>> :
>>>
>>> On 1/7/20 6:36 PM, ylms wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Is arm supposed to complain about the line with the %include as "T
Hello
Is arm supposed to complain about the line with the %include as "The
torrc differs from what tor's using. You can issue a sighup to reload
the torrc values".
It also complains, that the ExitPolicy, which is now in an %include
file, is missing. So that seems to be bogus.
Tor 0.4.2.5 in
Hello Christian,
please also report back with the information you found out. I am also
pretty interested, running Tor Exits for various German NGOs this really
is a topic I am interested in.
Currently the fastests Exit I operate in Germany is "only" doing a
little more than 30MiB/s I think. But it
Hello all,
I am wondering if there is any reason why one should not open the socks
port of Tor to the public internet? I mean I run a Tor exit or relay, so
why should I not open the port and give it to people that can't install
Tor on some devices?
Thanks for your thoughts.
yl
Hello nusenu,
On 10/4/19 12:43 PM, nusenu wrote:
> yes, operators with usable contactInfo get contacted directly by Roger
> himself.
so manually copied email addresses like this "tor AT ip-eend dot nl" and
then emails send, not automatic to only valid addresses? Right?
Regards
yl
__
Hello skarz,
On 10/3/19 3:17 AM, skarz wrote:
> What is the proper way to stop/start/restart a relay? I’ve ‘corrupted’ a few
> relays during this process, for example a relay had a new fingerprint after
> restarting the machine. Actually my biggest problems thus far are all based
> around Tor b
Hello
did anyone contact the relay operators by the given email addresses? I
someone would do this it would be nice, otherwise I will do this later
this weekend.
I would just forward this email here to let them know about that
information and ask them to subscribe to the list as well.
If someone w
On 9/27/19 7:10 PM, skarz wrote:
> at home
Not sure, but does a bridge need a static IP and do you have a static
IP? We did run some bridge with static IP on a VPS before and killed
after a few moths without activity.
Regards
yl
___
tor-relays mailing
On 4/5/19 10:58 AM, ylms wrote:
> "[WARN] Error binding network socket: Address already in use [991
> duplicates hidden]"
>
> I did use a search engine, but am not sure what too look for further.
> Also let me know if I should not worry at all.
>
> 991 war
On 4/5/19 6:16 PM, li...@for-privacy.net wrote:
> Hint for ylms: Socks 0 + reject in the torrc config.
>
> SocksPort 0
> SocksPolicy reject *
I think the latter is not needed because I did set "SocksPort 0" now,
then reloaded the config and got this:
09:06:52 [NOT
On 4/5/19 5:31 PM, li...@for-privacy.net wrote:
> Am 05.04.2019 10:58, schrieb ylms:
>
>> can someone point me at some information about this warning?
>>
>> "[WARN] Error binding network socket: Address already in use [991
>> duplicates hidden]"
>
&g
On 4/5/19 12:36 PM, torg...@linux-hus.dk wrote:
> hi, the adress is in use check what is running on your system and check
> also the ports
sudo lsof -i -P -n | grep LISTEN
does not show any ports used twice for the same address.
yl
___
tor-relays mai
Hello again,
can someone point me at some information about this warning?
"[WARN] Error binding network socket: Address already in use [991
duplicates hidden]"
I did use a search engine, but am not sure what too look for further.
Also let me know if I should not worry at all.
991 warnings are p
Hello Ben,
On 4/4/19 12:59 PM, Ben Riley wrote:
> So based on a connection of about 97Mb, which means I can usually peak out
> my download speeds at 11Mb/sec. Are those speeds above ok? I don't want to
> drown my connection, but happy to give it a couple of meg :)
just a short note from me, teor
r to block
their ip in the email. Not sure what my provider does with that reply,
but I never hear back from any people.
Thanks again for the help.
Regards
yl
Replies, just for reference:
1.
On 4/2/19 11:24 PM, Ralph Seichter wrote:> * ylms:
>
>> smtp:>>smtp.e
Hello fellow Tor-Exit operators,
today I got the following Abuse message:
//Start
[ SpamCop V5.0.0 ]
This message is brief for your comfort. Please use links below for details.
Email from 5.199.130.188 / Tue, 19 Mar 2019 12:20:30 +
https://www.spamcop.net/w3m?i=.(removed)
5.199.130.188
On 3/11/19 11:54 PM, teor wrote:
> We would like to make tor more helpful, and make it guess IPv6.
> But we're not there yet.
>
> Until then, people have to learn the details of tor's config
For relays on dynamic ADSL lines it would be helpful to provide the
static host part of an /56 or /64 ne
Hello digitalist,
On 3/11/19 9:40 PM, digitalist00 wrote:
> I had a lot of errors due to a lack of diskspace. Obvisly the logs had filled
> it up, so I commented the lines in the torrc that deal with logs.
you may need to check in /var/log how much space the files there take
up, also install (an
Hello digistalist,
On 3/9/19 8:14 PM, digitalist00 wrote:
> Dear helpers!
> Nyx says that my relay is unresponsive and that it was resumed. As I
> write this mail I have already 334 duplicates hidden.
> What's my problem and how can I solve this?
> The relay runs on a Raspberry Pi and is connected
On 3/11/19 12:22 AM, teor wrote:
> Have you tried reading tor's logs directly?
> (It looks like you are reading them through nyx.)
>
> Tor's logs should be at /var/log/tor/log , or a similar path.
In Raspian logs are sent to system journal, so "sudo journalctl -f -u
tor.service" will show the l
On 3/9/19 11:49 PM, digitalist00 wrote:
> OK: chown hat's gebracht.
Try to add the user you use to start nyx to the group tor runs with.
If you run a Debian based system it is "sudo usermod -a -G debian-tor
your_user_name" to add "your_user_name" to the group "debian-tor". That
should help for
Hello teor,
On 3/9/19 5:07 AM, teor wrote:
> ORPort [IPv6]:Port
>
> For example:
>
> ORPort [2001:db8::1]:9001
>
> Tor doesn't guess IPv6 addresses yet.
That was very helpful to find my stupid mistake.
thanks.
yl
___
tor-relays mailing list
tor-rela
Hello Roger,
thanks for you reply.
On 3/9/19 4:08 AM, Roger Dingledine wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 08, 2019 at 03:52:48PM +0100, ylms wrote:
>> Hello,
>> I just setup a new exit, I know it takes time to "train", but I would be
>> interested in tips on how to tweak it.
>
Hello,
I just setup a new exit, I know it takes time to "train", but I would be
interested in tips on how to tweak it.
I just replaces a old exit that used the same IP, but unfortunately we
lost that config/key.
So any tips are welcome in general.
I also have some questions.
Atlas does not show
35 matches
Mail list logo