Keifer Bly:
> So I just changed my torrc file contactinfo to Keifer dot bly at
> gmail dot com
>
> Do I need to restart my relay for this to take effect?
restart is not required but you need to reload it
> Will doing this make it more difficult for spammers to reach my
> address?
yes,
Hi,
relayor v18.0.0 is released.
https://github.com/nusenu/ansible-relayor
Changes since v0.4.0:
--
- show exit-notice HTML page on all exit IP addresses (#168, #175)
previously we only displayed the exit-notice HTML page
on IPv4 DirPort, this change adds DirPorts
How do I reload the relay without restarting it?
Thank you.
From: nusenu
Sent: Sunday, July 1, 2018 2:07 AM
To: tor-relays@lists.torproject.org
Subject: Re: [tor-relays] Contact info obfscation
Keifer Bly:
> So I just changed my torrc file contactinfo to Keifer dot bly at
> gmail dot com
>
> On 1 Jul 2018, at 21:10, Keifer Bly wrote:
>
> How do I reload the relay without restarting it?
To reload all the tor instances on your machine:
killall -HUP tor
To reload just one tor instance:
kill -HUP `cat tor.pid`
If you have "PidFile tor.pid" in your torrc.
T
On 07/01/2018 03:18 PM, teor wrote:
>
>> On 2 Jul 2018, at 02:27, Kay Slake wrote:
>>
>> I'd like to opt out of to relays. It's too technical for me. Thank you
>
> You can unsubscribe here:
>
>> https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays
>
> T
Maybe y'all ought to edit
> On 2 Jul 2018, at 02:27, Kay Slake wrote:
>
> I'd like to opt out of to relays. It's too technical for me. Thank you
You can unsubscribe here:
> https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays
T
___
tor-relays mailing list
On 07/01/2018 12:59 PM, arisbe wrote:
> Thank you Roman for quick reply. I had typo on ORPort address that but
> just in this email. My ISP at home and work does not pass Ipv6 so I am
> not able to ping/trace. I think I don't have the resources to work this
> problem to satisfactory conclusion
>> https://github.com/nusenu/ContactInfo-Information-Sharing-Specification#email
>>
>
> Does this have any chance to be adopted inside Tor or will it stay a
> side project?
I don't think it will be adopted by the tor project and I
don't aim for that, but I like the growing number of relays
Hi,
On 01/07/18 16:43, nusenu wrote:
> If adoption should ever become significant (>500?) maybe
> Relay Search will pick it up.
It probably would. (:
Thanks,
Iain.
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
___
tor-relays mailing list
Le 30/06/2018 à 09:02, nusenu a écrit :
> https://github.com/nusenu/ContactInfo-Information-Sharing-Specification#email
>
Does this have any chance to be adopted inside Tor or will it stay a
side project?
--
Johan Fleury
PGP Key ID : 0x5D404386805E56E6
I'd like to opt out of to relays. It's too technical for me. Thank you
On Sun, Jul 1, 2018, 9:11 AM Iain Learmonth wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On 01/07/18 16:43, nusenu wrote:
> > If adoption should ever become significant (>500?) maybe
> > Relay Search will pick it up.
>
> It probably would. (:
>
>
Hi,
>
> How often does the relay reach its traffic cap?
Every month. Rofltor03 is capped at ~10TB of incoming traffic. I can
probably spare another 5TB, but I don't think this will change things much.
> So it's not a good role for relays that have limited traffic or bandwidth.
> (We'd rather
This year I've modified most of my exit relays to function as IPv6
in/out. The process was easy with the exception of two [0], [1]. I
requested and received an IPv6 address, netmask and gateway from these
ISPs. I then modified my /etc/network/interfaces file as follows
leaving the IPv4
Hello,
In /etc/network/interfaces you set your IP to
> address 2a06:1700:0:1b::
which is equivalent of 2a06:1700:0:1b:0:0:0:0, or also 2a06:1700:0:1b::0.
But then in torrc you use:
> ORPort [2a06:1700:0:1b::1]:9001
From your configs, this is your upstream gateway IP, not IP of your
Thank you Roman for quick reply. I had typo on ORPort address that but
just in this email. My ISP at home and work does not pass Ipv6 so I am
not able to ping/trace. I think I don't have the resources to work this
problem to satisfactory conclusion so I'm still looking for suggestions.
Your
On Sun, Jul 01, 2018 at 11:24:44AM -0700, arisbe wrote:
> After a restart, both relays ramped up to a volume of connections where I
> was comfortable that the changes were good.
That's probably because you were listed in the last consensus, which
was already being used by a bunch of existing
>> And, finally, a quick question: Does NYX display incoming and outgoing IPv6
>> relay information? I assume ARM does not.
>
> This I do not know. :)
Should, but I've only tested it via mocks. Since I don't have an IPv6
relay there might be rough edges, if so then tickets welcome.
17 matches
Mail list logo
