Re: [tor-relays] #torstrike

2016-09-01 Thread I
> I was riffing a bit on Mao's infamous Hundred Flowers Campaign. "The policy > of letting a hundred flowers bloom and a hundred schools of thought contend > is designed to promote the flourishing of the arts and the progress of science." Depends on your threat model, I suppose. The full

Re: [tor-relays] #torstrike

2016-09-01 Thread Tristan
Is the Tor strike today? Because I just set up a second instance on my relay to get the most out of its bandwidth. Oops  ___ tor-relays mailing list tor-relays@lists.torproject.org https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays

Re: [tor-relays] #torstrike

2016-09-01 Thread Kenneth Freeman
On 09/01/2016 01:47 AM, grarpamp wrote: > On 8/31/16, Kenneth Freeman wrote: >> To me it seems to be a bit late in the day for a Cambrian >> Explosion -let a thousand anonymity networks bloom and see where it gets >> you. > > I wouldn't say that. So long as any

Re: [tor-relays] Useful metrics for relay operators

2016-09-01 Thread s7r
On 9/1/2016 12:18 PM, patacca wrote: [SNIP] > > I would find very useful a mail notification when the ed25519 key's > expiration date is near and the OfflineMasterKey is enabled. > Also if the expiry information could be shown on atlas that would be nice. The expiration date of the temporary

Re: [tor-relays] tor 0.2.8.x did not make it into OpenBSD 6.0?

2016-09-01 Thread nusenu
>> did I understand it correctly that tor 0.2.8.x did not make it into >> OpenBSD 6.0 because tor 0.2.8.x has been released to recently? > > Correct, it's at 0.2.7.6p1. > > There are ways of checking this, such as simply looking at a mirror's > package list: > >

Re: [tor-relays] tor 0.2.8.x did not make it into OpenBSD 6.0?

2016-09-01 Thread Michael McConville
nusenu wrote: > did I understand it correctly that tor 0.2.8.x did not make it into > OpenBSD 6.0 because tor 0.2.8.x has been released to recently? Correct, it's at 0.2.7.6p1. There are ways of checking this, such as simply looking at a mirror's package list:

[tor-relays] tor 0.2.8.x did not make it into OpenBSD 6.0?

2016-09-01 Thread nusenu
Hi Pascal, did I understand it correctly that tor 0.2.8.x did not make it into OpenBSD 6.0 because tor 0.2.8.x has been released to recently? thanks, nusenu signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature ___ tor-relays mailing list

Re: [tor-relays] Useful metrics for relay operators

2016-09-01 Thread patacca
On 31/08/2016 18:51, Alison wrote: > Hello all, > > After Roger's recent checkin emails to this list, some of the folks from > the community and metrics teams have started to brainstorm ways that we > could use Onionoo data [1] to give better support and recognition to the > relay operators. For

Re: [tor-relays] New tor relay not showing up on Atlas

2016-09-01 Thread Karsten Loesing
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 01/09/16 04:33, teor wrote: > >> On 1 Sep 2016, at 12:07, Marina Brown >> wrote: >> >> Hi All: >> >> I've set up a new relay and it is not showing up on Atlas. This >> is the Log output. >> >> Sep 01 03:52:27.000

Re: [tor-relays] #torstrike

2016-09-01 Thread grarpamp
On 8/31/16, Kenneth Freeman wrote: > As for the burgeoning of anonymity networks other than Tor, it'll be > interesting to see what level of interest law enforcement organs take in > them, if any. We know certain elements and entities are not at all fond of encryped

[tor-relays] Any users of FlashProxy, any servers?

2016-09-01 Thread grarpamp
On 8/31/16, Kenneth Freeman wrote: > Flash proxy may be of some utility here Being not outside the tor ecosystem it's not really something all that different to explore (regarding topics of the other thread). It's basically a pluggable transport with unique 'nodes as