Re: [tor-relays] is it possible to relay using ipv6?

On 22.11.2016 04:10, Roger Dingledine wrote: > If all the relays stay away from 0.2.9 until we call it stable, then it > will definitely not be stable for relays. :) ;-) So, I will try the latest alpha release and build it from source. Thanks a lot

Re: [tor-relays] is it possible to relay using ipv6?

On Tue, Nov 22, 2016 at 04:07:56AM +0100, diffusae wrote: > Is it safe to use 0.2.9 alpha on relays or will it be better to test the > IPv6 client support by running Tor alpha client in a desktop environment? In general, more testing of 0.2.9 would be great. Just make sure you stay up to date as

Re: [tor-relays] is it possible to relay using ipv6?

> On 22 Nov. 2016, at 14:07, diffusae wrote: > > Hi! > > On 22.11.2016 03:33, teor wrote: >> 0.2.9 alpha > > Is it safe to use 0.2.9 alpha on relays We think it is safe to use 0.2.9.5-alpha on relays. But we could do with more help testing it. 0.2.9.4-alpha and

Re: [tor-relays] is it possible to relay using ipv6?

Hi! On 22.11.2016 03:33, teor wrote: > 0.2.9 alpha Is it safe to use 0.2.9 alpha on relays or will it be better to test the IPv6 client support by running Tor alpha client in a desktop environment? Regards, ___ tor-relays mailing list

Re: [tor-relays] is it possible to relay using ipv6?

> On 22 Nov. 2016, at 03:18, Ralph Seichter wrote: > > On 21.11.2016 16:39, teor wrote: > >> Relays require an IPv4 address, because every relay in the Tor network >> needs to be able to connect to every other relay. If some relays can't >> reach other relays, then

Re: [tor-relays] Fwd: Spam mailout

On 11/21/2016 08:33 AM, Alison wrote: > Hi Petrusko, > > I got the same to this riseup account, which is not connected to a > relay. So it may be targeting riseup users. This riseup account is connected to my relays, and I haven't received this "Spam mailout" message. 0xDD79757F.asc

Re: [tor-relays] 33C3 Ticket

I apologize for hijacking the thread. I just need to know how to contact the support team. On Tue, Nov 22, 2016 at 2:04 AM, D wrote: > Hi Kevin, > > Please don't hijack the thread. > > I'd like to direct you to other lines of help, especially the IRC channel > - #tor on

Re: [tor-relays] 33C3 Ticket

Hi Kevin, Please don't hijack the thread. I'd like to direct you to other lines of help, especially the IRC channel - #tor on OFTC. See also https://www.torproject.org/about/contact.html.en#support With proxies, perhaps you need to set up a bridge. When you start TBB, select "my ISP is

Re: [tor-relays] 33C3 Ticket

On 11/21/2016 04:21 PM, Kevin Zvilt wrote: > Kevin from Cairo, still trying to set up Tor as a functioning browser. Oops. I lost track of what list this is :( Better to use tor-talk for such questions. But I think that I know the answer. The DisableNetwork option in Tor can get wedged on (value

Re: [tor-relays] 33C3 Ticket

Seems my proxy is refusing all connections. On Tue, Nov 22, 2016 at 1:35 AM, Mirimir wrote: > On 11/21/2016 04:21 PM, Kevin Zvilt wrote: > > Kevin from Cairo, still trying to set up Tor as a functioning browser. > > What's the problem? > > > On Tue, Nov 22, 2016 at 1:19 AM,

Re: [tor-relays] 33C3 Ticket

On 11/21/2016 04:21 PM, Kevin Zvilt wrote: > Kevin from Cairo, still trying to set up Tor as a functioning browser. What's the problem? > On Tue, Nov 22, 2016 at 1:19 AM, wrote: > >> I am in the same position. >> >> >> 2016-11-21 23:17 GMT+01:00 pa011 : >>

Re: [tor-relays] 33C3 Ticket

Kevin from Cairo, still trying to set up Tor as a functioning browser. On Tue, Nov 22, 2016 at 1:19 AM, wrote: > I am in the same position. > > > 2016-11-21 23:17 GMT+01:00 pa011 : > >> Looking to meet other Exits in Hamburg - just need a ticket :-) >> >>

Re: [tor-relays] 33C3 Ticket

I am in the same position. 2016-11-21 23:17 GMT+01:00 pa011 : Looking to meet other Exits in Hamburg - just need a ticket :-) Paul ___ tor-relays mailing list tor-relays@lists.torproject.org

[tor-relays] 33C3 Ticket

Looking to meet other Exits in Hamburg - just need a ticket :-) Paul ___ tor-relays mailing list tor-relays@lists.torproject.org https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays

Re: [tor-relays] network scan results for CVE-2016-5696 / rfc 5961

On 21/11/16 14:43, Olaf Selke wrote: > Am 19.11.2016 um 16:49 schrieb Alex Haydock: >> >> There are some graphs showing (the lack of) network diversity here, >> which are interesting to look at: >> >> http://torstatus.blutmagie.de/network_detail.php > > yes, this chart displays routers' domain

Re: [tor-relays] Fwd: Spam mailout

Le 21/11/2016 à 16:33, Alison a écrit : > Hi Petrusko, > > I got the same to this riseup account, which is not connected to a > relay. So it may be targeting riseup users. Ok, thx for reporting this too. signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Re: [tor-relays] is it possible to relay using ipv6?

On 21.11.2016 16:39, teor wrote: > Relays require an IPv4 address, because every relay in the Tor network > needs to be able to connect to every other relay. If some relays can't > reach other relays, then clients won't be able to select paths at > random. When I wrote that "using IPv6 is not

Re: [tor-relays] is it possible to relay using ipv6?

> On 22 Nov. 2016, at 02:26, Ralph Seichter wrote: > > On 21.11.2016 14:39, Tristan wrote: > >> IPV6 isn't backwards compatible, so literally every hop, skip, and >> jump on the Internet would need to be upgraded to support it. Many ISPs >> find it much easier and

Re: [tor-relays] network scan results for CVE-2016-5696 / rfc 5961

Am 19.11.2016 um 16:49 schrieb Alex Haydock: There are some graphs showing (the lack of) network diversity here, which are interesting to look at: http://torstatus.blutmagie.de/network_detail.php yes, this chart displays routers' domain country codes Another view on the blutmagie live

Re: [tor-relays] is it possible to relay using ipv6?

On 21.11.2016 14:39, Tristan wrote: > IPV6 isn't backwards compatible, so literally every hop, skip, and > jump on the Internet would need to be upgraded to support it. Many ISPs > find it much easier and cheaper to just re-use the older IPV4 addresses. IPv4 addresses are running out, and using

Re: [tor-relays] is it possible to relay using ipv6?

Unfortunately, only a small portion of the world is IPV6 capable: https://www.google.com/intl/en/ipv6/statistics.html IPV6 isn't backwards compatible, so literally every hop, skip, and jump on the Internet would need to be upgraded to support it. Many ISPs find it much easier and cheaper to just

Re: [tor-relays] is it possible to relay using ipv6?

> On 21 Nov. 2016, at 23:09, Flavio Leitner wrote: > > Hi, > > I am trying to configure a relay for the first time but I am > behind a cgnat for IPv4. Sorry, Tor relays need an IPv4 address to join the network.

[tor-relays] is it possible to relay using ipv6?

Hi, I am trying to configure a relay for the first time but I am behind a cgnat for IPv4. I have a public and open IPv6 though. However, ORPort doesn't accept [ipv6]:443 and it doesn't automatically bind to :::443 either. This is running LEDE tor 0.2.8.9-1. I couldn't find if worth to run over

[tor-relays] Fwd: Spam mailout

Hey, Here a copy of a mail containing an attached file logs_petrusko.zip containing .js sent to my mail address used for relays... This file edit here : https://framabin.org/?0b8d246a55e76e07#deg6j9x5HjLbtOhY9rA6FIiINzthE0t+qfYUJc+Bp3s= It smells like shit... I'm not 100% sure, but first time