Re: [tor-relays] Unwarranted discrimination of relays with dynamic IP

> I would like to hear about ONE Raspi Tor operator who was allowed by DirAuths > (or bwauths or whatever) to come even near 1 mbit/s bandwidth utilization > let me tell: https://atlas.torproject.org/#details/AA44C4BE3C90DCAAC09E5CD26150710AAA80D58B

Re: [tor-relays] network diversity with freeBSD - solved

> On 6 Dec. 2016, at 08:32, diffusae wrote: > > Hi! > > On 05.12.2016 21:32, pa011 wrote: >> its working currently on Tor 0.2.8.9 (recommended) >> otherwise it might conflict with arm? > > Yes I know this, you could solve this with a jail. So if you run > tor-devel

Re: [tor-relays] network diversity with freeBSD - solved

Hi! On 05.12.2016 21:32, pa011 wrote: > its working currently on Tor 0.2.8.9 (recommended) > otherwise it might conflict with arm? Yes I know this, you could solve this with a jail. So if you run tor-devel inside a jail and use a cloned loopback interface for the control port. > Any quick idea

Re: [tor-relays] Unwarranted discrimination of relays with dynamic IP

Hi all Just to add some perspective... I'm running a relay on dynamic ip. My ISP will usually not change my IP assignment as long as it's in use. The platform in use is not Rasberry Pi, but Odroid C2. Also an ARM, but a bit more powerful one. Kind regards On Mon, 5 Dec 2016 at 16:36 Rana

Re: [tor-relays] network diversity with freeBSD - solved

its working currently on Tor 0.2.8.9 (recommended) otherwise it might conflict with arm? $ sudo pkg update && sudo pkg upgrade -y Updating FreeBSD repository catalogue... FreeBSD repository is up-to-date. All repositories are up-to-date. Updating FreeBSD

Re: [tor-relays] network diversity with freeBSD - solved

Hi! That's nice to hear. RAM is also very good for tor relays. :-) Maybe you want to change your version to tor-devel-0.2.9.5.a, if you don't done this already (e. g. portsnap fetch update && portmaster security/tor-devel). Regards, On 05.12.2016 18:32, pa011 wrote: > Working :-) > > It

Re: [tor-relays] network diversity with freeBSD - solved

Working :-) It looks like it was missing the Address in torrc. I added up some RAM before- that didn’t help. Ok, now I have time to follow up all your other recommendations in the coming days. Thank you all very much for your help! Best Regards Paul p.s. as it is finally that easy to get

Re: [tor-relays] Unwarranted discrimination of relays with dynamic IP

-Original Message- >From: tor-relays [mailto:tor-relays-boun...@lists.torproject.org] On Behalf Of >Duncan Guthrie > >Keep in mind also that the Raspberry Pi (at least the first one anyway) can >only push around 1MB/s tops. The ethernet port is basically held on by the >equivalent of a

Re: [tor-relays] Unwarranted discrimination of relays with dynamic IP

> >I think it would be interesting see as to whether allowing bridges to have >dynamic IPs (or even encouraging it) would make them harder to block, and >would make it really easy for people >to contribute to the network in this >small way? Or at least, having a mostly dynamic IP - some devices

Re: [tor-relays] Unwarranted discrimination of relays with dynamic IP

Again, bits or bytes? If the original Raspberry Pi can push 1MByte, that's 8Mbits, so you could get 4Mbits both ways. On Dec 5, 2016 9:08 AM, "Duncan Guthrie" wrote: > On 04.12.2016 22:35, Tristan wrote: > >> Perhaps this IS in fact normal. I ran a Tor relay on a Raspberry

Re: [tor-relays] Unwarranted discrimination of relays with dynamic IP

On 04.12.2016 22:35, Tristan wrote: Perhaps this IS in fact normal. I ran a Tor relay on a Raspberry Pi for a while. My speed was about 1Mbps max, similar to your 1.5Mbps. I saw minimal traffic, and the consensus weight never went above 20. I'm not running a relay at home anymore because of the

Re: [tor-relays] Unwarranted discrimination of relays with dynamic IP

On 12/4/2016 7:39 AM, Rana wrote: >> For as little as $10.00 US there are VPS' with static ip's.. > > Attn: Kurt Besig > > Well I kind o' like my Raspberry Pi that cost me $40 including box and power > supply and SD card and door to door delivery, with far more horsepower and > memory than

Re: [tor-relays] network diversity with freeBSD

On 12/05/16 02:40, grarpamp wrote: > On Sat, Dec 3, 2016 at 10:14 AM, pa011 wrote: >> [WARN] Your server (x.x.x.x.:4443) has not managed to confirm that its >> ORPort is reachable. Relays do not publish descriptors until their ORPort >> and DirPort are reachable. > >

Re: [tor-relays] Unwarranted discrimination of relays with dynamic IP

On 4 Dec 2016 9:58 pm, "Rana" wrote: That was exactly my point, thank you Anemoi. This is the case all over the world, not just in Germany. Unfortunately there seems to be a culture of shooting the messenger here, or accusing him of being “aggressive”, “accusatory”,

Re: [tor-relays] Unwarranted discrimination of relays with dynamic IP

For efficiency upon yourself and others... Don't add the '$'. Use lower case for fingerprints with no spaces (ticketed). Use the same myfamily line including all your relays for all your relays, no point in trying to leave announcing relay out of list.