at 6:14 AM John Csuti via tor-relays <
tor-relays@lists.torproject.org> wrote:
> Update your version of tor this is an old issue that has been fixed in the
> latest version.
>
> Thanks,
> John C.
>
> > On Jan 16, 2022, at 4:17 AM, AMuse wrote:
> >
> >
&g
Hi all!
I'm operating a TOR Exit on dedicated hardware. The load average is low
(0.07) and the network load is fine (120Mb/sec out of a 1Gb/sec link).
Connections aren't being dropped, and for all I can see things are fine.
However, on the TOR Metrics relay search, my exit consistently shows as
Hey all, I wanted to chime in on this thread because I'm suddenly seeing
DNS "Overload" errors (and corresponding notices that my system is
overloaded on prometheus) lately as well.
The hardware and OS and configs for my public exit haven't changed - what
has changed is that I upgraded tor
My ISP (Hurricane Electric) forwards me support tickets with abuse emails
they receive, and asks that I respond to their ticket with information so
they can show that they did their duty as an ISP in informing me.
Because I typically get floods of this abuse-SPAM from only a few dedicated
Hi all! I'm curious what y'all think of this situation.
I have SSH open as an exit port on a TOR exit that my friends and I are
maintaining - and of course it's the #1 offender by far in automated abuse
notifications we get from our ISP, from peoples' fail2ban servers sending
abuse emails. This
Hi all! I'm getting a number of ISP Abuse complaints around outbound ssh
brute-forcing from our exit relay.
I'm personally of the opinion that people should run fail2ban (or equiv)
and get on with life and I generally ignore the complaints - but wondered,
what are other operators doing?
Is
I'm not switching off my relay, primarily because I'm lazy and can't be
arsed to figure out what all the politics bullshit is about.
Some project member did some shit and other project members are mad at
them. Other people may or may not be righteously mad at the first people
for reasons I
Looks like you got more than you paid for.
On 2015-12-03 18:46, Kurt Besig wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> That I got two responses after posting to tor-relays regarding a
> fairly simple, I thought, CntrolPort question on a new VPS relay..
> That's pathetic.
Are you aware that you just wrote "write that sort of retort privately"
by not, yourself, writing your retort privately?
As to why I published my original reply to the list, it's because I felt
that other lurkers who are perhaps newbies to how open source support
listservs work might also
peoples' time and expertise for free.
On 2015-12-04 10:21, Kurt Besig wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> On 12/4/2015 9:29 AM, AMuse wrote:
>
>> Looks like you got more than you paid for. On 2015-12-03 18:46, Kurt Besig
>> wrote: That I got
I also went through the "Ask us for a shirt" instructions and never
heard back. :(
On 2015-11-20 11:29, Jannis Wiese wrote:
> This is what https://www.torproject.org/getinvolved/tshirt.html [1]says:
>
>> The nice people at torservers.net are handling the tshirt requests.
>
> I got a note
did you send them something? As they're doing it voluntarily, just give
> them some time. :) Also, as the guys at torservers.net <http://torservers.net
> [1]> are operating some nice exit nodes, they're most probably reading this.
> On 20.11.2015, at 20:39, AMuse <tor-
Given the current state of the internet (ie, massive warrantless spying
by LEO's and packet inspection by ISP's) I cannot imagine how any TOR
operator would block encrypted services and not be what most reasonable
people consider a "Bad exit".
On 2015-10-29 14:05, Mike Perry wrote:
> Green
>Some people out there apparently are of the opinion that it is a
>reasonable choice to use the ugly crutch that is "fail2ban" instead of
>deprecating password based authentication for ssh.
You're technically correct (the best kind) but I wanted to point out
that Fail2Ban is a really useful
The TOR directory of exit nodes is readily available for ISP's and
website operators to apply in their filters. I don't see why them
putting the onus on tens of thousands of exit operators to exit-block
THEIR addresses is in any way reasonable.
On 2015-10-20 12:51, yl wrote:
> Hello,
> I
15 matches
Mail list logo
