Re: [tor-relays] VPNGate Project Exit Node Volunteers / I2P

On Sun, Apr 1, 2018 at 6:38 AM grarpamp wrote: > > VPN Gate and I2P interweaved in the same message. How are they related? > > Similar to tor, these networks both offer 'exit' functionality > to their users that you can help support by running such > nodes on them. Their

Re: [tor-relays] VPNGate Project Exit Node Volunteers / I2P

On Wed, Mar 28, 2018 at 11:53 PM grarpamp wrote: > http://www.vpngate.net/ > > For those relay operators who may have extra > non tor listed IP addresses and want to help > a related projects / userbase. > > https://geti2p.net/ > > I2P also has an exit proxy function. > > > "

Re: [tor-relays] Firewalls

On Fri, Mar 2, 2018 at 10:04 AM TorGate wrote: > Hi to all, > I have a simple question, what is the best firewall solution ? > With sourcecode and must be opensource. > What are you trying to protect? An entire network or a single host? Q --

Re: [tor-relays] FreeBSD 11.1 ZFS Tor Image

On Wed, Feb 28, 2018 at 6:38 PM mick wrote: > But in the real world we /have/ to trust someone, somewhere, somehow, > sometime. What everyone has to decide for themselves is /how much/ trust > to give, to whom, when, where and why. And that depends entirely on your > threat

Re: [tor-relays] Api for atlas.torproject.org

On Fri, Feb 16, 2018 at 3:27 AM flipchan wrote: > Im trying to write an ip checker script for a mail server/firewall and i > want to be able check if the ip is a tor relay, is their a api for looking > up ips on atlas.torproject.org ? > Do you want to check if it's any

Re: [tor-relays] switching from root to unprivileged user

On Wed, Feb 14, 2018 at 9:48 PM Zack Weinberg wrote: > No, 'ps' should show the unprivileged user. Check whether you have a > "User" setting in your torrc. (I think George was referring > specifically to the way FreeBSD pkgsrc configures tor.) Adding a User setting and updating

Re: [tor-relays] torservers internet connection

On Wed, Feb 14, 2018 at 10:41 PM TorGate wrote: > Is this a god ide to setup more servers on this 60MB connection ? > Does the connection have multiple IP addresses? -- 0101100101010100110101010101010010100110

[tor-relays] switching from root to unprivileged user

On Wed, Feb 14, 2018 at 7:34 PM George wrote: > TorGate: > > is this a god ide tor running as root ? > > It doesn't run as root. root starts the daemon, then switches over to > unprivileged/nologin _tor user. > Is this the case even if "ps -C tor u" shows it runs as root? Q

Re: [tor-relays] unreplied conntrack sessions

> > Yep, changing provider is 98% complete. I have a new instance running at > online.net since last night: > > The new instances is running well: https://atlas.torproject.org/#details/45A9735BE83ECE864B23621B8D266E6A1AEA96F6 I like being able to enable IPv6 as well. Q --

Re: [tor-relays] unreplied conntrack sessions

> > It is probably still the best solution to change provider - if you are > still considering it. > Yep, changing provider is 98% complete. I have a new instance running at online.net since last night: https://atlas.torproject.org/#details/45A9735BE83ECE864B23621B8D266E6A1AEA96F6 Q --

Re: [tor-relays] unreplied conntrack sessions

Does the exits/relays keep the circuit connections open? On Tue, Jan 30, 2018 at 11:45 PM teor <teor2...@gmail.com> wrote: > > On 31 Jan 2018, at 05:54, Quintin <tor-admin@portaltodark.world> wrote: > > nusenu wrote: > > If your hoster suspends your serve

[tor-relays] unreplied conntrack sessions

nusenu wrote: > If your hoster suspends your server if you exceed 10k concurrent connections > I'm afraid it is probably not suitable for an exit relay The response from the hoster was: > Your server should not have over 20,000 unreplied connections. This is a sign of abuse. What about the exit

Re: [tor-relays] tor on arm vps

.net/> / Scaleway.com <http://scaleway.com/> > > There is not much Choice. > > On 28. Jan 2018, at 19:17, Quintin <tor-admin@portaltodark.world> wrote: > > > Exit > > On Sun, Jan 28, 2018 at 8:16 PM niftybunny <ab...@to-surf-and-protect.net> > wrote:

Re: [tor-relays] tor on arm vps

Exit On Sun, Jan 28, 2018 at 8:16 PM niftybunny <ab...@to-surf-and-protect.net> wrote: > Exit or Guard? > > > On 28. Jan 2018, at 19:11, Quintin <tor-admin@portaltodark.world> wrote: > > any other providers you can recommend? > > On Sun, Jan 28, 2018

Re: [tor-relays] tor on arm vps

et/scaleway.com is that everyone is there. A > very good target for a black box sucking of Tor traffic. > > > On 28. Jan 2018, at 18:56, Quintin <tor-admin@portaltodark.world> wrote: > > these scaleway.com hosts are quite neat. do I need to notify them I > intend to use it as

Re: [tor-relays] debugging unbound on 'torexit' failing DNS queries (solved)

Hmmm. I think it's time to change to another provider. Quintin On Fri, Jan 26, 2018 at 12:43 PM nusenu <nusenu-li...@riseup.net> wrote: > If your hoster suspends your server if you exceed 10k concurrent > connections > I'm afraid it is probably not suitable for an exit re

Re: [tor-relays] debugging unbound on 'torexit' failing DNS queries (solved)

-p tcp -m comment --comment Tor -m tcp --dport 443 -j ACCEPT* *-A INPUT -j DROP* *-A FORWARD -j DROP* *COMMIT* Quintin On Wed, Jan 24, 2018 at 9:15 PM nusenu <nusenu-li...@riseup.net> wrote: > > > Quintin: > > Seems my VPS got suspended when I increased the connlimit above 1

Re: [tor-relays] debugging unbound on 'torexit' failing DNS queries (solved)

appily does 200-250mbit/s according to > netdata accounting and my monitoring regularly pegs it at nearly 200k > connections. Usually 100-150k. > > On Sun, Jan 21, 2018 at 4:06 PM, nusenu <nusenu-li...@riseup.net> wrote: > > > > > > Quintin: > >> Ah, thats

[tor-relays] tor on arm vps

I see online.net has a lot of ARM VPSes. Does tor run fine on these? Q -- 01011001010101001101011101000101010010100110 01001100010001010101001101010011001001011001010001010101 ___ tor-relays mailing list

Re: [tor-relays] debugging unbound on 'torexit' failing DNS queries

Ah, thats it. My conntrack entries are full and temporarily increasing it resolves the problem. What would be a reasonable conntrack limit for a tor exit? On Thu, Jan 18, 2018 at 10:45 PM nusenu <nusenu-li...@riseup.net> wrote: > > > Quintin: > >> Do you reach your

Re: [tor-relays] debugging unbound on 'torexit' failing DNS queries

; control-key-file: "/etc/unbound/unbound_control.key" control-cert-file: "/etc/unbound/unbound_control.pem" include: /etc/unbound/conf.d/*.conf Quintin -- 01011001010101001101011101000101010010100110 01001100010001010101001101010011

Re: [tor-relays] debugging unbound on 'torexit' failing DNS queries

of the time. At this stage large amounts these errors start appearing: *> Jan 17 19:27:33 torexit unbound: [559:0] notice: remote address is 192.42.93.30 port 53> Jan 17 19:27:33 torexit unbound: [559:0] notice: sendto failed: Operation not permitted* Quintin On Thu, Jan 18, 2018 at 12:42 PM nusenu