Re: [tor-relays] #torstrike

Good job, thank you! > Am 02.09.2016 um 17:26 schrieb D.S. Ljungmark : > > I just multiplied my BandwidthRate with a bit for my exit. > > //Spid > > >> On 02/09/16 02:28, Tristan wrote: >> Is the Tor strike today? Because I just set up a second instance on my >> relay to get

Re: [tor-relays] #torstrike

I just multiplied my BandwidthRate with a bit for my exit. //Spid On 02/09/16 02:28, Tristan wrote: > Is the Tor strike today? Because I just set up a second instance on my > relay to get the most out of its bandwidth. > > Oops  > > > > ___ >

Re: [tor-relays] #torstrike

> I was riffing a bit on Mao's infamous Hundred Flowers Campaign. "The policy > of letting a hundred flowers bloom and a hundred schools of thought contend > is designed to promote the flourishing of the arts and the progress of science." Depends on your threat model, I suppose. The full

Re: [tor-relays] #torstrike

Is the Tor strike today? Because I just set up a second instance on my relay to get the most out of its bandwidth. Oops  ___ tor-relays mailing list tor-relays@lists.torproject.org https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays

Re: [tor-relays] #torstrike

On 09/01/2016 01:47 AM, grarpamp wrote: > On 8/31/16, Kenneth Freeman wrote: >> To me it seems to be a bit late in the day for a Cambrian >> Explosion -let a thousand anonymity networks bloom and see where it gets >> you. > > I wouldn't say that. So long as any

Re: [tor-relays] #torstrike

On 8/31/16, Kenneth Freeman wrote: > As for the burgeoning of anonymity networks other than Tor, it'll be > interesting to see what level of interest law enforcement organs take in > them, if any. We know certain elements and entities are not at all fond of encryped

Re: [tor-relays] #torstrike

On 08/31/2016 04:39 PM, grarpamp wrote: > On 8/31/16, Green Dream wrote: >> Well said grarpamp. >> >>> there are plenty of other already existing, interesting, and >>> upcoming anonymous overlay networks for transporting IP, messaging, >>> storage and so on. >> >> Mind

Re: [tor-relays] #torstrike

On 8/31/16, Green Dream wrote: > Well said grarpamp. > >> there are plenty of other already existing, interesting, and >> upcoming anonymous overlay networks for transporting IP, messaging, >> storage and so on. > > Mind sharing some names here so I can research further?

Re: [tor-relays] #torstrike

Well said grarpamp. > there are plenty of other already existing, interesting, and > upcoming anonymous overlay networks for transporting IP, messaging, > storage and so on. Mind sharing some names here so I can research further? ___ tor-relays mailing

Re: [tor-relays] #torstrike

We have 2016 not 1950. Update your ntp server. > assault/abuse/exploitation. The western culture we have collectively > created, where women are the lesser equals, and this underlining tone of > male arrogance that if a women was sexually abused/exploited that she > wanted it, was looking for

Re: [tor-relays] #torstrike

Hi, I'm a white-boy from a silly-old-town. I would like to express my perspective on the sexual assault/abuse/exploitation. The western culture we have collectively created, where women are the lesser equals, and this underlining tone of male arrogance that if a women was sexually

Re: [tor-relays] #torstrike

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Dear team, Speaking as a former Tor board member and as a relay and bridge node operator, I'm more confident in Tor than ever before. I'm pleased with the new leadership team as well as the direction of the Tor Project. I'm pleased with the careful

Re: [tor-relays] #torstrike

Personally, the expulsion of Appelbaum and the replacement of the board make me *more* confident in the Tor organization. The relays I run, B6C7FAFFFCEFC30541D38F33E25B1E0DB135C5D8 (non-exit) and 78C7C299DB4C4BD119A22B87B57D5AF5F3741A79 (exit), will NOT be participating in this "strike". I am

Re: [tor-relays] #torstrike

Arisbe writes: > > I agree in general with a lot of what is said here, but I have to take issue with one point: > > > > Okay, so I've been concerned about the safety of at-risk Tor users > since all this shit broke. New employees at the organizational >

Re: [tor-relays] #torstrike

Or six-years-old-sand...@lists.torproject.org This whole manifesto sounds like it was written by spoiled teenager or counter intelligence agent who is trying to incite unrest. Its designed to provoke emotions and doesn't deal with anything real. And I think its really awesome. This means that

Re: [tor-relays] #torstrike

I concur with all you say below. Exceptionally well spoken. Evidently you have some solid experience in your corporate managerial role. Thanks for speaking up. On Sun, Aug 21, 2016 at 11:50:37PM -0700, Arisbe wrote: >Okay, so I've been concerned about the safety of at-risk Tor users since

Re: [tor-relays] #torstrike

This thread should be moved to [ tor-knitting-cir...@lists.torproject.org ] or write to The Tor Corporation you think exists. Robert > -Original Message- > From: tor-am...@foofus.com > Sent: Sun, 21 Aug 2016 20:35:50 -0700 > To: tor-relays@lists.torproject.org > Subject:

[tor-relays] #torstrike

Okay, so I've been concerned about the safety of at-risk Tor users since all this shit broke.  New employees at the organizational structure serving as the main accuser, an all new board with interrelationships and motivation unknown, grenades rolled under office doors

Re: [tor-relays] #torstrike

I'm not switching off my relays. I'd prefer to leave the politics to other people. > Fact: The investigation done by Tor Inc, was run by the primary accusers > of Jacob Applebaum. Citation needed. ___ tor-relays mailing list

Re: [tor-relays] #torstrike

I'm not switching off my relay, primarily because I'm lazy and can't be arsed to figure out what all the politics bullshit is about. Some project member did some shit and other project members are mad at them. Other people may or may not be righteously mad at the first people for reasons I

Re: [tor-relays] #torstrike

On 21/08/16 10:02 PM, Zenaan Harkness wrote: > Fact: Jacob Applebaum's directory authority was a target of NSA's > XKEYSCORE: > https://contraspin.co.nz/the-weaponising-of-social-part-3-the-resurrection-of-ioerror/ Of course, perhaps they all are. > Fact: Jacob Applebaum got kicked from Tor Inc,

Re: [tor-relays] #torstrike

On Sun, 21 Aug 2016 19:53:26 -0600 Marcel Krzystek wrote: > ​What are the thoughts of relay operators on this? > https://ghostbin.com/paste/kmnzz > > I can be persuaded otherwise, and perhaps i'm being naive, but i > believe that operation of the network should remain

Re: [tor-relays] #torstrike

If Tor software is open source and therefore free to be examined for tricks what does any person matter to we who contribute hardware resources to the Tor network which in turn is used by unknown people who need privacy sometimes for very serious reasons?Robert  supersluet...@gmail.com wroteI

Re: [tor-relays] #torstrike

I read some tweets and found some articles. Jake Applegate stepped down from the project, and Sheri replaced the board of directors. But this strike wants to replace all Tor project members because of Applegate. I'm not connecting the dots, and the response on Twitter seems to be mostly against

Re: [tor-relays] #torstrike

On Sun, Aug 21, 2016 at 07:53:26PM -0600, Marcel Krzystek wrote: > ​What are the thoughts of relay operators on this? > https://ghostbin.com/paste/kmnzz > > I can be persuaded otherwise, and perhaps i'm being naive, but i believe > that operation of the network should remain independent from the

Re: [tor-relays] #torstrike

I've never believed in strikes. They never seem to really do anything, other than make something unaccessible for a day or 2 (just like the Wikipedia blackout a few years ago). I don't understand any of the demands on the page, or why they matter. Tor does its job, whether an ex-CIA agent helps