Hello.
I recently set up a new relay, jaffacakemonster2, I would be grateful if
someone could answer some questions for me.
1. The bandwidth on Atlas is listed as "0". Is this a wait a few days/new
relay issue or a configuration issue. I was surprised to find exit relays
are default now, I hope I
Hi thanks for getting back to me.
> Right now I only see 2 on jaffacakemonster2 and 1 on jaffacakemonster.
> Seeing 3 would be weird, because in order for a pair of relays to be in
> the same family, they must both list each other in their torrcs.
>
My family thing has settled now, I think this
Hello.
I have configured my relay (jaffacakemonster2) to be non exit, however arm
shows me the following (I edited out IPs' & some lines after copy/paste
from connection screen for others security / brevity)
Connections (1878 inbound, 2113 outbound, 19 exit, 1 control)
IP--> :443 (HTTPS)
Hello,
On Mon, Mar 5, 2018 at 2:49 AM, teor wrote:
> I think this is a bug in arm.
> Try nyx.
I switched to nyx and it is fine allthough on deeper inspection the IP to
is actually my IP so clearly this is a bug.
On 5 March 2018 at 18:18, Damian Johnson wrote:
> Oops! Actual
Hello,
On 6 March 2018 at 00:06, Damian Johnson wrote:
>
> > I switched to nyx and it is fine allthough on deeper inspection the IP
> to is actually my IP so clearly this is a bug.
>
> Hi Gary. Sorry, not sure I follow. Are you saying Nyx (not arm) is
> labeling these as
Hello,
On 10 March 2018 at 04:48, Arisbe wrote:
>
> Simple question: Do Tor middle relays and bridges work on cloud systems?
>
I use AWS, I and it is fine, they also have a fat internet connection :-).
Amazon have EC2 and Lightsail. EC2 is more for hosting many servers/VM's,
Lightsail is basic
Hello
On 11 March 2018 at 02:50, wrote:
> Dear All,
> On March 5 I changed to the newest version 3.2.10 on a middle relay I
> run. I went away for a few days, checked today, and found that my traffic
> is down, and my connexions, which were around 2,000 since December, are now
> about 1,000. C
Hello,
On 11 March 2018 at 22:02, wrote:
> Thanks, Gary; I was just wondering, since I think of mine as a typical
> small relay, and wondered if others had noticed the same differences.
>
>
Before December, my accountingmax was 3GB, I had to increase it to 8GB stop
it from hibern
Hello.
I made a "hello world" hidden service and I had to following message in the
logs about exceeding launch limit. I have not seen this before. I had one
onion for a while and added a second one recently - not sure if that
matters as it is only complaining about the first one.
I am not sure wh
Hello
On 20 March 2018 at 18:31, smichel0 wrote:
> Hello,
> from time to time, arm looks like below:
> https://smichel.ocloud.de/index.php/s/q2knnq3AD67rPjK
> But with a simple keystroke (arrow) it runs again. After a few days it
> seems to crash completely:
> https://smichel.ocloud.de/index.php
Hello
On 20 March 2018 at 11:01, George Kadianakis wrote:
> Gary writes:
> Hmm,
>
> this could be explained by a few different reasons and this could be a
> hint that we should make this log a bit more silent instead of having it
> bark loudly for no reason. The onion serv
un its the same as arm, for example:
sudo -u debian-tor nyx
Hope that helps.
Gary
___
tor-relays mailing list
tor-relays@lists.torproject.org
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays
Hello.
The ultra-paranoid would comment that it is better to have dedicated
machines / VM's for each instance, and that machine should do nothing more
than be a relay. However sometimes that isn't an option so instead there is
tor-instance-create.
It sounds like your problems are in a file at
/us
Hello. It is good you got it working,
On 23 March 2018 at 05:04, smichel0 wrote:
>
> Tor has now a uptime of about 22 hrs, it ran with an up-/download-average
> of about 47 KB/sec which is really low.
> Now there is no up- or download at all.
If it is a new relay it takes at least a week for fo
Hello.
On 23 March 2018 at 21:13, Roger Dingledine wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 23, 2018 at 11:53:08AM -0400, smichel0 wrote:
> > Yes, thank you. Nyx is running, but the relay is down again. It was down
> in the morning. I restartet it and now it's obvisely down again since noon.
> But nyx is still OK.
Hello.
On 25 March 2018 at 07:46, smichel0 wrote:
> Things getting slower and slower. "Fast"-, "V2Dir"- and "stable"-flags are
> gone.
> Speedtest (netztest.at): 24 Mbit/s down and 6,2 Mbit/s up, ping: 43 ms.
>
I'm sorry I should of said speedtest-cli / speedtest.net is not the most
scientific
Hello.
I too have noticed this, and have been keeping track. The number of users
has gone up slightly yet number of relays has said roughly the same, I
don't think this is enough to explain what is going on though.
On Fri, 30 Mar 2018, 18:09 , wrote:
> I'm asking because before the update to th
Hello.
Go to https://check.torproject.org > "...for more info about this
relay...relay search" link
If I receive a message saying this relay uses an outdated version does that
mean that my traffic is any less secure?
Does Tor take potentially insecure relay versions in to account when
creating c
Hello.
I wish to know if it is possible to have Tor Browser use my relay for
traffic instead of its own client on start up.
At the moment if you change the proxy settings to your relay after startup
1) an observer would of noticed the specific Tor Browser traffic AND the
relay 2) Tor Browser chec
for tor myself, there is no need to Torify Netflix
lol.
Thinking about what someone would see if they could monitor my internet
connection, it would be harder to correlate relays than see extra bytes on
relay search so I think I will leave Tor Browsers settings alone.
Gary
__
about 4 days but I am sure someone more knowledgeable can
provide a more specific number.
Gary.
___
tor-relays mailing list
tor-relays@lists.torproject.org
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays
Hello
On 27 April 2018 at 06:36, smichel0 wrote:
> Thanks for reply!
> Cookieauthentication is set on 1.
> I did "sudo adduser $USER debian-tor". (https://trac.torproject.org/
> projects/tor/ticket/25890#comment:1)
> On Raspbian Pi the default user is pi, so I added it as user, but it
> didn't h
Hello.
On Sun, 20 May 2018, 21:33 , wrote:
> Arm says I have 3506 outbound
> 354 exit
>
> Nyx has long blue list but states 50 outbound. No mention of exits.
>
> What am I doing wrong with Nyx?
>
> Gerry
>
As people on this list of said / helped me, Arm is old and
Hi,
I keep having issues with my home router - it keeps failing due to the
number of connections and I would be grateful for some advice.
I have been running a (non-exit) middle relay for some time and up until
now my router has mostly coped. It is what is what I got from my ISP, I
can't afford t
Hello
On Thu, Aug 30, 2018 at 3:25 PM grarpamp wrote:
> This particular case receiving mentions for at least a few months...
> D1E99DE1E29E05D79F0EF9E083D18229867EA93C kommissarov 185.125.33.114
On Thu, 30 Aug 2018 at 22:11, Nathaniel Suchy wrote:
> So this exit node is censored by Turkey. T
Hi,
Yes I too got messages from Cynthia every few hours (wanting to meet) until
I blocked the email address.
Thanks
On Fri, 31 Aug 2018, 22:52 Matthew Glennon, wrote:
> Anyone else getting nude photos and random links from Cynthia Coleman <
> cynthiacoleman843...@ru.irzum.com> attached to this
f the topic.
Thanks,
Gary
On Sat, 1 Sep 2018 at 00:12, Conrad Rockenhaus
wrote:
> Hi teor,
>
> It seems the criticism originated from one guy (Ralph) and one troll who
> bravely refuses to identify himself.
>
> You want me to stop talking about even the cool things we’re acco
oint out what you are doing is good - I apologise if I
appear to be "trolling" you, I am genuinely interested in learning the
technical pro's and con's relating to this topic.
Thanks again,
Gary.
On Sun, 2 Sep 2018 at 02:26, Conrad Rockenhaus
wrote:
> Gary,
>
> It’s b
On Sun, 2 Sep 2018 at 01:05, Mirimir wrote:
> Maybe also an indicator in
> Tor browser, showing the censorship level of the exit that they're using.
>
Good idea, as previously said, different counties block/censor different
things, so simply changing a circuit will get around this (for now).
W
Hello,
On Tue, 4 Sep 2018, 11:20 Paul Templeton, wrote:
> But seriously -
>
> https://www.homeaffairs.gov.au/about/consultations/assistance-and-access-bill-2018
> And -
>
> https://www.homeaffairs.gov.au/about/national-security/five-country-ministerial-2018
>
> The thing that worries me is that
"the laws of
mathematics are great - Australian laws are better" (referring to back
doors in encryption), perhaps under these new laws they can force a person
to work more than 24 hours a day lol.
Thanks.
On Tue, 4 Sep 2018 at 14:01, teor wrote:
>
> On 4 Sep 2018, at 21:57, Gary
Hello.
I am getting this too, I saw this the logs a few months ago and didn't
think anything of it, this time though I ran Wireshark while started tor,
and it appears tor is transmitting encrypted info over port 80. I have the
.pcap file to prove it.
I started / stopped the relay a few times so I
Hello.
If it is not set in your torrc, try looking in the torrc-default file
/usr/share/tor/tor-service-defaults-torrc
If you forget where this file is, look in the log where for two lines near
the top for "loading torrc" or something
If nothing is there, write EXITRELAY 0 yourself, right at
Hello.
I use AWS to test the alpha release, on the free tier. If you dont mind me
asking, I am interested to know what you are doing to avoid a bill Amazon
bill at the end of the month.
I think I had about 30GB data transfer or so & a few other things and they
sent me a bill for USD 0.70 ish (not
I can only spare a few GB or so day from my home internet, so I set the
ACCOUNTING MAX daily limit to 3GB (in + out = 6GB) and RELAYBANDWIDTHRATE
to 200KB (BURST 400KB), after much experimenting this was the balance
between not hibernating before the 24hr are over and leaving enough bytes
left over
Hi,
Firstly, on 9th of this month, tor 0.3.2.9 was released, I was wondering
when it is available the official repos via apt-get? I'd rather not compile
from source because its on a its on a pi and will takes ages and I will be
effectively loosing auto-updates for tor.
I have been testing the 0.3
, Jan 15, 2018 at 10:42 AM, teor wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On 15 Jan 2018, at 21:18, Gary Smith wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> Firstly, on 9th of this month, tor 0.3.2.9 was released, I was wondering
> when it is available the official repos via apt-get? I'd rather not compile
> from sou
Hi,
I have noticed that after a few minutes of becoming online, and randomly
perhaps a couple of times every hour (??) tor uses 100 % processor on all
cores for about 40/50 seconds.
I am curious what is tor doing internally to need so much power? There is
normally isn't more than 4 mbits going th
>
> Every hour, Tor downloads directory documents, creates diffs to recent
> consensuses,
> and compresses the documents (and diffs) using gzip, zstd, and lzma.
>
>
Thanks for getting back to me.
Except during the mentioned peaks, the relay only uses 5 - 6 % of available
CPU power on a machine tha
I have the same worry as Martin. I set up a bridge on AWS 2 weeks ago by
following the instructions here https://cloud.torproject.org/ and choosing a
bridge image for Ireland.
Setup went well, log files on startup tell me my bridge contacts the tor
network, and I checked I could use my bridge b
hint: None
SRP username: None
Start Time: 1628842910
Timeout : 300 (sec)
Verify return code: 21 (unable to verify the first certificate)
---
What am I missing? Am I implementing the NoAdvertise & NoListen options of the
ORPort directive incorrectly?
David,
The ISP has port 9001 blocked to the Public Address.
Do the ports have to be the same, when using NoAdvertise & NoListen with the
ORPort directive?
Thanks!
Gary
On Saturday, August 14, 2021, 12:20:36 AM MDT, David Figuera
wrote:
> ORPort 198.91.60.78:443 NoListen
&
configuration?
Is there a way to force the External Tor Nodes that initiate the measurement
connections to use TLSv1.2 or TLSv1.3 with the Private Address:Port binding and
Public Advertised Address:Port combination?
Thanks, again, for your assistance.
Respectfully,
Gary
On Saturday, August 14
, dropping to zero.
Any idea why PortForwarding would cause the written/read bytes per second graph
to drop to zero?
Respectfully,
Gary
On Tuesday, August 17, 2021, 7:43:22 AM MDT, Gary C. New
wrote:
All:
After reviewing several packet-traces of Tor bound directly to the
All:
Nevermind... After roughly 48 hours, the written/read bytes per second graph,
on the metrics.torproject.org site, began showing normal activity, again.
Please consider this thread resolved.
Respectfully,
Gary
On Monday, August 23, 2021, 2:15:07 AM MDT, Gary C. New
wrote:
All
to the World.
Is it truly necessary to expose the ORPort to the World in a pluggable
transport configuration?
Thank you for your assistance.
Respectfully,
Gary
—
This Message Originated by the Sun.
iBigBlue 63W Solar Array (~12 Hour Charge)
+ 2 x Charmast 26800mAh Power Banks
= iPhone XS Max 512
flake configuration is set to "none?"
BTW... I have the loadbalanced OBFS4 configuration up and running, and am able
to manually confirm loadbalanced OBFS4 connections are successfull.
nginx => obfs4proxy => tor
I believe it's time to enable a DistributionMethod.
Thank you for the clarifica
ks to make this possible have been
implemented, but it isn't clear whether everything needed is in place as I
receive a bridge/relay down status on metrics.torproject.org when the ORPort
isn't exposed to the World.
Thank you for your assistance.
Respectfully,
Gary—
This Message Originated
nks, again.
Gary—
This Message Originated by the Sun.
iBigBlue 63W Solar Array (~12 Hour Charge)
+ 2 x Charmast 26800mAh Power Banks
= iPhone XS Max 512GB (~2 Weeks Charged)
On Friday, December 9, 2022, 8:43:03 PM PST, David Fifield
wrote:
On Fri, Dec 09, 2022 at 08:43:26AM +, Gary C.
On Saturday, December 10, 2022, 8:01:15 AM MST, David Fifield
wrote:
On Sat, Dec 10, 2022 at 05:19:43AM +, Gary C. New via tor-relays wrote:
>> I'm in the process of trying to cross-compile snowflake for OpenWRT and
>> Entware. Are there any other dependencies to compil
ave exhausted
> the 5-tuple space. Please check the discussion at #40201 again, because
> I documented this detail there.
> I urge you to run an experient yourself, if these observations are not
> what you expect. I was surprised, as well.
I wonder if IP_BIND_ADDRESS_NO_PORT is better
configuration.
Thanks, again, for your guidance.
Respectfully,
Gary
P.S. I posted the Snowflake Package Makefile on the OpenWRT forum for reference:
https://forum.openwrt.org/t/snowflake-makefile/145259
On Saturday, December 10, 2022, 12:05:51 PM MST, Gary C. New
wrote:
On Saturday, December
On Monday, December 12, 2022, 08:31:43 AM MST, David Fifield
wrote:
On Sun, Dec 11, 2022 at 04:25:06AM +, Gary C. New via tor-relays wrote:
>> I was successfully able to get Snowflake cross-compiled and installed for
>> OpenWRT and Entware as a package.
> Thanks, nice w
an no
longer client connect over them. However, I am able to successfully client
connect over the new ServerTransportListenAddr and Port.
Is it possible to use HTTPTunnelPort and SocksPort in Bridge Mode (BridgeRelay
1)?
Respectfully,
Gary—
This Message Originated by the Sun.
iBigBlue 63W Solar
eful within the context
of bridging connections between snowflake-server and tor (not as a pluggable
transport similar to obfs4proxy)?
What about a connection flow of haproxy/nginx => (snowflake-server =>
extor-static-cookie => tor) on separate servers?
Thanks, again.
Gary ___
HTTPTunnelPort and SocksPort successfully work along side
BridgeRelay 1 Mode.
Respectfully,
Gary—
This Message Originated by the Sun.
iBigBlue 63W Solar Array (~12 Hour Charge)
+ 2 x Charmast 26800mAh Power Banks
= iPhone XS Max 512GB (~2 Weeks Charged)
On Tuesday, December 13, 2022, 3:56:26 AM PST
s force the
corresponding protocol?
If so... Are there any ServerTransportOptions that can force the obfs4 protocol
on the legacy obfs2|3 transports?
Also... It wasn't clear in the manual whether obfs4proxy -enableLogging takes
an optional path/file?
I appreciate any knowledge on the subjects.
Respect
lib/tor/pt_state/obfs4proxy.log)
I appreciate you confirming the obfs4proxy -enableLogging question as well. It
seems like a symlink will have to do.
Thank you for your time and assistance.
Respectfully,
Gary
On Wed, 14 Dec 2022 at 10:02, Gary C. New via tor-relays
wrote:
>
> All:
>
On Tuesday, December 13, 2022, 07:35:23 PM MST, David Fifield
wrote:
On Tue, Dec 13, 2022 at 07:29:45PM +, Gary C. New via tor-relays wrote:
>> On Tuesday, December 13, 2022, 10:11:41 AM PST, David Fifield
>> wrote:
>>
>> Am I correct in assuming extor-static-cook
On Friday, December 16, 2022, 8:07:46 AM PST, meskio
wrote:
Quoting Gary C. New via tor-relays (2022-12-10 04:20:48)
>> What is the status of Bug #7349 - Obfsbridges should be able to "disable"
>> their ORPort?
>> https://bugs.torproject.org/tpo/core/to
)?
Example:
/opt/sbin/tor -f /tmp/torrc
Starting Tor manually is a great way of diagnosing torrc startup issues.
Keep at it. You're almost there.
Kind Regards,
Gary—
This Message Originated by the Sun.
iBigBlue 63W Solar Array (~12 Hour Charge)
+ 2 x Charmast 26800mAh Power Ba
- obfs4
- Bridge distribution mechanism
- None
I have confirmed that I am able to manually connect and successfully browse
using the obfs4 bridges in question.
Suggestions?
Respectfully,
Gary—
This Message Originated by the Sun.
iBigBlue 63W Solar Array (~12 Hour Charge)
+ 2 x Charmast 26800mA
skio.net/crypto.txt
> -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
> Nos vamos a Croatan.
meskio,
I’m facing a similar issue with rdsys reporting "no resources for the given id"
for my relay.
Are there any common causes for the "no resources for the given id" message?
Respectfully,
Gary ___
tor-relays mailing list
tor-relays@lists.torproject.org
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays
f the issue is confirmed, you can configure the machine layer firewall to
block all outbound tcp/22 traffic initiated from the server in question with
iptables, etc.
I doubt it is Tor related.
Best Wishes!
Gary—
This Message Originated by the Sun.
iBigBlue 63W Solar Array (~12 Hour Charge)
On Sunday, July 30, 2023, 3:30:55 PM MDT, li...@for-privacy.net
wrote:
> I don't know if I should ignore that or better configure it that >way:
> ORPort 127.0.0.1:8443 NoListen
> ORPort 8443 NoAdvertise
> ORPort [::1]:8443 NoListen
> ORPort 8443 NoAdvertise
Other way around:
ORPort 8443 NoLis
On Monday, July 31, 2023, 2:11:52 PM MDT, li...@for-privacy.net
wrote:
> On Montag, 31. Juli 2023 00:55:15 CEST Gary C. New via tor-relays wrote:
> > On Sunday, July 30, 2023, 3:30:55 PM MDT, li...@for-privacy.net wrote:
> > > I don't know if I should ignore that or b
On Tuesday, August 1, 2023, 10:54:40 AM MDT, wrote:
On Montag, 31. Juli 2023 23:06:54 CEST Gary C. New via tor-relays wrote:
>> Please let me know, if you are able to get the OBFS4
>> bridge working without exposing the ORPort. Respectfully,
> Yes, that's
On Wednesday, August 2, 2023, 10:09:06 AM MDT, meskio
wrote:
> Quoting li...@for-privacy.net (2023-08-02 17:13:53)
> > On Dienstag, 1. August 2023 23:22:12 CEST Gary C. New via tor-relays wrote:
> > > On Tuesday, August 1, 2023, 10:54:40 AM MDT,
>wrote:
> > &g
As an at-Home, Middle-Relay operator, I experienced similar issues. Initially,
I attempted to solve the problem by using dnsmasq + nginx to reverse proxy the
blacklisted sites through a dedicated vpn, which worked... with some issues.
As the issues increased, I decided to secure a new IP Address
On Monday, August 7, 2023, 2:28:56 PM MDT, s7r wrote:
li...@for-privacy.net wrote:
> On Samstag, 5. August 2023 08:40:42 CEST Marco Predicatori wrote:
>> secureh...@gmail.com wrote on 8/4/23 01:46:
>>> I tried reporting a similar issue a few months ago (post wasn’t approved
>>> by
>>> moderat
On Tuesday, August 8, 2023, 10:24:44 AM MDT, wrote:
On Dienstag, 8. August 2023 00:30:38 CEST Gary C. New via tor-relays wrote:
> > In addition to network diversity, there is the fact that most individuals
> > find it necessary to run an at Home internet connection 24 x
Alessandro,
I would recommend running bridges (opposed to relays) on a home network to
avoid browing issues with your bank, news, etc as these entities often block
Tor relays and not bridges.
Respectfully,
Gary
On Saturday, July 6, 2024, 3:07:52 PM MDT, Roger Dingledine
wrote:
On
, indifferent, or malicious to the purposes of a Middle
Relay and block any known Tor relays.
There are ways around the issue using a VPN, Reverse Proxy, etc, but I found
that running bridges on a home network is more suitable.
Good luck in whichever path you decide to pursue.
Respectfully,
Gary
Il
All:
Does anyone here know the procedure of the
router_do_orport_reachability_checks() function?
I've increased logging of my Tor Relay to info and taken several
packet-captures, but can't seem to identify connections initiated by my Tor
Relay when verifying my ORPort reachability. I just see co
verified within the debug logs and viewing the connections section
of the nyx application.
Apologies, if this is common knowledge. We needed to confirm the procedure to
resolve issues related to Tor's Self-Test.
Respectfully,
Gary
On Sunday, August 29, 2021, 10:02:52 PM MDT, Gary C
Hi All!
Curious... What are the magic numbers (i.e., max timeout, reoccurrence, etc)
that earn a relay overloaded status?
I'm trying to tune my portion of the Tor network and finding that sweet spot
has proven elusive.
Thanks!
Gary
On Friday, September 24, 2021, 3:48:18 AM MDT, S
has reached an overloaded state.
Thank You.
Respectfully,
Gary
On Saturday, September 25, 2021, 7:11:31 AM PDT, Silvia/Hiro
wrote:
Hi,
I went back in history and tried to find out whenever your node
FriendlyExit1 was overloaded. I couldn't find the exact descriptor.
One thing I
) is/are a maximum timeout value
and/or reoccurrence value, etc.
By knowing what the overloaded state metric is, I can tune my Tor relay just
short of it.
Thank you for your reply.
Respectfully,
Gary
On Monday, September 27, 2021, 2:44:35 AM PDT, Georg Koppen
wrote:
Gary C. New via
ould be greatly appreciated.
Respectfully,
Gary
P.S. This is all being done on ASUSWRT-Merlin using AiMesh nodes, but isn't
limited to that architecture. I hope to publish a tutorial, after ironing out
all the kinks.
On Tuesday, September 28, 2021, 7:01:04 AM MDT, David Goulet
wrote:
ed in, but I would
expect better than 4MB/s. I believe I remember reading it was based on an
average 10 second burst rate, but in what direction is the connection initiated?
Thanks, again.
Gary
___
tor-relays mailing list
tor-r
d down.
Am I right in thinking the answer to this question is... It is what it is?
Respectfully,
Gary
On Tuesday, October 5, 2021, 12:01:13 AM PDT, Georg Koppen
wrote:
Gary C. New via tor-relays:
>
> David Goulet:
>
>
>
>
> Will you confirm whether the Adve
Hiro,
It took me a minute to find the newly added causal information inline with the
example PortMetrics output. I was expecting two distinct sections: Possible
Causes and Possible Remedies.
Either way, thank you for adding the information.
Respectfully,
Gary
On Tuesday, October 5, 2021
I have to agree with Bleedangel on both points that they make: 1. Attempting
to troubleshoot a relay every 3 days takes some serious patience and 2.
Guidance in setting up PortMetrics is as important as understanding is output.
Excellent Suggestions!
Respectfully,
Gary
On Wednesday
multiple relay
nodes within my portion of the Tor network. I would like to add redundant ISP's
and routers to my topology, as well.
Respectfully,
Gary—This Message Originated by the Sun.iBigBlue 63W Solar Array (~12 Hour
Charge)+ 2 x Charmast 26800mAh Power Banks= iPhone XS Max 512GB (~2 Week
The log you provided shows 0 circuits open. Something is not right with that
instance. I know 124 days of uptime is a great achievement, but it might be
time to restart that instance.
Did a medium-term key not update properly or the like?
Respectfully,
Gary—
This Message Originated by the Sun
ou might reconsider the way metrics are reported in the future to accurately
report loadbalanced Tor Relays.
As always, thank you for all the work you do.
Respectfully,
Gary—
This Message Originated by the Sun.
iBigBlue 63W Solar Array (~12 Hour Charge)
+ 2 x Charmast 26800mAh Power Banks
= iP
s greatly appreciated.
Respectfully,
Gary—
This Message Originated by the Sun.
iBigBlue 63W Solar Array (~12 Hour Charge)
+ 2 x Charmast 26800mAh Power Banks
= iPhone XS Max 512GB (~2 Weeks Charged)
On Monday, October 18, 2021, 2:10:12 AM MDT, Gary C. New via tor-relays
wrote:
All
It's surprising that you're running into CPU issues. It's typically RAM that is
exhausted first.
I have 5 x Dual Core 256MB Tor Relay Nodes loadbalanced as a Single Middle
Relay that never have CPU issues. It's always a matter of running out of RAM
for me. The loadbalanced Tor Relay maintai
.
iBigBlue 63W Solar Array (~12 Hour Charge)
+ 2 x Charmast 26800mAh Power Banks
= iPhone XS Max 512GB (~2 Weeks Charged)
On Wednesday, November 10, 2021, 2:36:13 AM MST, failing.flyaway443--- via
tor-relays wrote:
Hi Gary,
thank you for your response.
I think I just worry too much.
I
Bobby,
I run a Tor relay on dual core 256MB devices with a 250Gb fiber connection and
they are adequate to operate as a fast middle relay.
Monitor your relay on https://metrics.torproject.org/ to verify.
Respectfully,
Gary—
This Message Originated by the Sun.
iBigBlue 63W Solar Array (~12
sh publicly.
Respectfully,
Gary—
This Message Originated by the Sun.
iBigBlue 63W Solar Array (~12 Hour Charge)
+ 2 x Charmast 26800mAh Power Banks
= iPhone XS Max 512GB (~2 Weeks Charged)
On Thursday, November 11, 2021, 5:59:45 AM PST, gus
wrote:
Hi,
On Wed, Nov 10, 2021 at 09:14:58PM
On Sunday, December 12, 2021, 1:32:09 AM PST, Natus wrote:
>> As for finding out if anyone is using it or not, I use:
>> netstat -n |grep ESTA|wc -l
>This one does not limit to tor bridge
Pipe the bridge's destination port (i.e., ) through grep as well:
netstat -anp | grep : | grep EST |
proach?
I look forward to hear more of your Tor farming practices.
Respectfully,
Gary—
This Message Originated by the Sun.
iBigBlue 63W Solar Array (~12 Hour Charge)
+ 2 x Charmast 26800mAh Power Banks
= iPhone XS Max 512GB (~2 Weeks Charged)
On Sunday, December 12, 2021, 1:31:09 AM PST, ab
ges).
Whichever the situation, it's nice to know there are multiple solutions to Tor.
Thank you for the overview of your Tor deployments. I hope that I have answered
your question regarding my Tor implementation.
Respectfully,
Gary—
This Message Originated by the Sun.
iBigBlue 63W Solar Array (
ows a DNS
timeout error. As I do not operate an exit relay, I don't know whether the DNS
timeout error would cause Tor not to start.
Respectfully,
Gary—
This Message Originated by the Sun.
iBigBlue 63W Solar Array (~12 Hour Charge)
+ 2 x Charmast 26800mAh Power Banks
= iPhone XS Max 512GB
nd is only reported for a
single Upstream Tor Node, but that's not a big deal. It would be helpful if
metrics were pulled remotely instead pushed.
Please provide your email address and I'll be happy to message you directly
with the name of my Tor Meta Relay.
Respectfully,
Gary—
This Message O
esses, and configure Timeout to a Large Value (e.g., 5 minutes or
300 seconds) to allow the Tor instances to detect and deal with any overload
state themselves (not the Loadbalancer)
Respectfully,
Gary—
This Message Originated by the Sun.
iBigBlue 63W Solar Array (~12 Hour Charge)
+ 2 x Charmast 268
iques.
Respectfully,
Gary—
This Message Originated by the Sun.
iBigBlue 63W Solar Array (~12 Hour Charge)
+ 2 x Charmast 26800mAh Power Banks
= iPhone XS Max 512GB (~2 Weeks Charged)
On Thursday, December 16, 2021, 4:43:29 AM MST, meskio
wrote:
Quoting Space Oddity via tor-relays (2021-12-16 11:
esign attempting to anonymize a
sub-network within an established known super-network.
Thank you for your response.
Respectfully,
Gary—
This Message Originated by the Sun.
iBigBlue 63W Solar Array (~12 Hour Charge)
+ 2 x Charmast 26800mAh Power Banks
= iPhone XS Max 512GB (~2 Weeks Charged)
On Thu
this sheds some light on my previous comment.
Respectfully,
Gary
"It seems to be an inherent obstacle in design attempting to anonymize a
sub-network within an established known super-network." –Gary C. New
On Monday, December 27, 2021, 7:03:34 AM MST, Dave Warren
wrote:
On 20
1 - 100 of 129 matches
Mail list logo
