On Wed, Aug 08, 2012 at 10:03:59PM +, adrelanos wrote:
A new law proposing to make Tor and similar software illegal in US would
be a damn hard hit against Tor. And the other remaining free countries
can establish similar laws. No more free countries = no more Tor.
No more legal Tor, you
On Thu, Aug 9, 2012 at 3:29 AM, Ted Smith te...@riseup.net wrote:
What did that commenter do? They don't say.
Further, get an idea isn't statistics.
Where did I talk about exit node statistics? I mentioned the
possibility of gathering .onion access statistics.
No, but I'd rather say nothing
On Thu, 09 Aug 2012 00:47:26 +, Maxim Kammerer wrote:
...
are stupid? As I said, it detracts from the project's credibility.
Anyone who installs Tor (or I2P, for that matter) and explores the
hidden services,
Erm, how *do* you 'explore' hidden services? After all, they are
not indexed by
On Thu, Aug 9, 2012 at 10:39 AM, Andreas Krey a.k...@gmx.de wrote:
Erm, how *do* you 'explore' hidden services?
The Hidden Wiki [1] is (or are, there have been several alternates) a
good start. It used to be down quite often after some kids tried to
play in vigilantism on Tor network, but seems
Sorry for the rant.
On Wed, Aug 8, 2012, at 23:47, Maxim Kammerer wrote:
Anyone who installs Tor (or I2P, for that matter) and explores the
hidden services, immediately sees the overwhelmingly illegal (mostly,
since it depends on jurisdiction) content. Anyone who runs an exit
node immediately
Eugen Leitl:
On Wed, Aug 08, 2012 at 10:03:59PM +, adrelanos wrote:
A new law proposing to make Tor and similar software illegal in US would
be a damn hard hit against Tor. And the other remaining free countries
can establish similar laws. No more free countries = no more Tor.
No more
On Thu, 2012-08-09 at 09:54 +0300, Maxim Kammerer wrote:
On Thu, Aug 9, 2012 at 3:29 AM, Ted Smith te...@riseup.net wrote:
What did that commenter do? They don't say.
Further, get an idea isn't statistics.
Where did I talk about exit node statistics? I mentioned the
possibility of
Ted Smith:
So far you didn't say anything useful or non-obvious, so why did you
post? You didn't like someone's written experience, so he is
automatically a troll or a false flag — fine, bring your own
references.
I don't have to bring my own references to point out that the only
*actually
On Wed, 8 Aug 2012 07:23:46 -0400
grarpamp grarp...@gmail.com wrote:
Tor cannot accept known 'illegal' money, therefore acknowledgement
is moot. About the best Tor could do is be able to accept anonymous
donations in the first place. Then publish a bitcoin address for
donations from anyone.
On Sat, Aug 4, 2012 at 3:52 PM, m...@tormail.org wrote:
This is a followup post on this issue which persists in Linux TBB 32bit,
version 2.2.37-2.
Any idea for the cause?
What occurs when it doesn't list the library loading (is the library
loading?) and why it's listed
only on a TBB
On Thu, Aug 9, 2012 at 7:00 PM, Ted Smith te...@riseup.net wrote:
How would you do that without facing the same problem as someone
wiretapping their own exit node? Do you have a CP classifier? Are you
going to load each .onion and manually verify if it contains CP? How are
you going to
Maxim Kammerer:
On Thu, Aug 9, 2012 at 7:00 PM, Ted Smith te...@riseup.net wrote:
How would you do that without facing the same problem as someone
wiretapping their own exit node? Do you have a CP classifier? Are you
going to load each .onion and manually verify if it contains CP? How are
you
On Fri, Aug 10, 2012 at 2:23 AM, adrelanos adrela...@riseup.net wrote:
That wouldn't prove what Tor is used for most.
.onion is only a part of Tor. 1% or 99%? Who can know that?
Now *that* can actually be measured at RV points, and I think should
be a part of Tor metrics. I suspect that the
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Introduction:
There are not only technical attacks against the Tor network. Another
strong attack against Tor are legal attacks (i.e. attacking with laws,
not saying the attack is legal). The adversary tries to put Tor into
the worst light and tries
14 matches
Mail list logo
