Am Donnerstag 08 August 2013 schrieb adrelanos:
Thomas Hluechnik:
My opinion: to be honest we all assume under normal circumstances that a
piece
of software is trustworthy until it is proofed that it contains a weakness
or
backdoor.
With regard of security the opposite is true:
On Fri, Aug 9, 2013 at 12:50 PM, grarpamp grarp...@gmail.com wrote:
There were a few threads over on tor-talk in which a
gmail staff participated. Some community suggestion
was made for refundable bitcoin deposit to appease
the google claims, not sure where that went.
We're still paying
On 08/10/2013 05:34 AM, Mike Hearn wrote:
On Fri, Aug 9, 2013 at 12:50 PM, grarpamp grarp...@gmail.com
wrote:
There were a few threads over on tor-talk in which a gmail staff
participated. Some community suggestion was made for refundable
bitcoin deposit to appease the google claims, not
Hello!
It looks that The Pirate Bay will enter secure browser market,
http://torrentfreak.com/pirate-bay-releases-pirate-browser-to-thwart-censorship-130810/
http://piratebrowser.com/
I do not understand why they do the same as TBB. Anyone know?
--
Jerzy Łogiewa -- jerz...@interia.eu
--
Jerzy Łogiewa:
Hello!
It looks that The Pirate Bay will enter secure browser market,
http://torrentfreak.com/pirate-bay-releases-pirate-browser-to-thwart-censorship-130810/
http://piratebrowser.com/
I do not understand why they do the same as TBB. Anyone know?
With the limited
urgh, another Firefox mashup?
https://sourceforge.net/projects/torbrowser/
is with a secure QT Browser and they should have used this, as it has no
Firefox backdoor.
The policy must be changed to allow divers apps, so that there a several
models. Mono Culture is never good.
2013/8/10 Jerzy
On Sat, Aug 10, 2013 at 05:20:47PM +, adrelanos wrote:
Jerzy Łogiewa:
Hello!
It looks that The Pirate Bay will enter secure browser market,
http://torrentfreak.com/pirate-bay-releases-pirate-browser-to-thwart-censorship-130810/
http://piratebrowser.com/
I do not understand
thomas.hluch...@netcologne.de: Am Donnerstag 08 August 2013 schrieb
adrelanos:
Thomas Hluechnik:
My opinion: to be honest we all assume under normal
circumstances that a piece
of software is trustworthy until it is proofed that it contains
a weakness or
backdoor.
With regard of
Hi,
Am 10.08.13 20:03, schrieb Randolph D.:
https://sourceforge.net/projects/torbrowser/
How often do you want to advertise this project, which clearly violates
the Tor policy on usage of the name Tor?
https://www.torproject.org/docs/trademark-faq.html.en
Lutz
signature.asc
Description:
On Sat, Aug 10, 2013 at 07:29:39PM +, Matthew Finkel wrote:
The one thing I always think about when I hear about the comparison of
censorship circumvention vs. anonymity[0] is something I once heard (maybe
from Jake or Roger, I apologies for not having a citation),
Jake and I tried to
On Sat, Aug 10, 2013 at 08:03:38PM +0200, Randolph D. wrote:
urgh, another Firefox mashup?
Well, at least they didn't try to shmush the word Tor into the name.
More power to them, I say.
Though I would also recommend that they get in touch with Mike, Erinn,
and others about the Tor Browser
On 08/10/2013 12:49 PM, Jerzy Łogiewa wrote:
Hello!
It looks that The Pirate Bay will enter secure browser market,
http://torrentfreak.com/pirate-bay-releases-pirate-browser-to-thwart-censorship-130810/
http://piratebrowser.com/
I do not understand why they do the same as TBB. Anyone
Matthew Finkel:
However, I do think it is worth it to look at what
magic they use in Iran and North Korea. Is it more than using Tor and a
hidden service?
I would be surprised if they recommended or implemented something else
than bridges.
--
tor-talk mailing list -
Hello!
I like to start a conversation about secure email provider,
If I start new email provider now, how to guarantee security and privacy for
user? Understanding limitation of email of course! Is there some best
practice for secure email service? Lavabit method was it seems not enough. Do
On Sat, Aug 10, 2013 at 4:34 AM, Mike Hearn he...@google.com wrote:
...
You may be interested in checking out Pond...
https://pond.imperialviolet.org/
It is an email-like messaging system that runs over Tor, has forward
security, tries to beat traffic analysis, ...
this is the kind of
On 08/10/2013 11:34 AM, Mike Hearn wrote:
On Fri, Aug 9, 2013 at 12:50 PM, grarpamp grarp...@gmail.com wrote:
There were a few threads over on tor-talk in which a
gmail staff participated. Some community suggestion
was made for refundable bitcoin deposit to appease
the google claims, not
Tor 0.2.4.16-rc is the second release candidate for the Tor 0.2.4.x
series. It fixes several crash bugs in the 0.2.4 branch.
https://www.torproject.org/dist/
Changes in version 0.2.4.16-rc - 2013-08-10
o Major bugfixes:
- Fix a bug in the voting algorithm that could yield incorrect results
17 matches
Mail list logo
