1) Has there been any discussions regarding the severity of the problem
Seems not much tech issue here, the tor client treats .onion as special
and funnels the whole thing to the dht. tor will get a new config bitmap
that says 'set priority to resolve .onoin in dht or external first, or remain
Some people think the only valid / conceivable form
of community / comms on the net are 'forums'.
Well, they're free to set one up. And if it takes
off, then have it integrated into tpo and use the
tor name. And if facebook/twitter is their thing
they can chime in there already today. No project
On Mon, May 19, 2014 at 01:27:27AM -0400, grarpamp wrote:
I've not read a tpo filing in years, so if not already,
a yearly 'where does the money go' bar chart would
be nice.
Maybe you read
https://blog.torproject.org/blog/transparency-openness-and-our-2012-financial-docs
only 9 months ago?
On Mon, May 19, 2014 at 7:06 AM, grarpamp grarp...@gmail.com wrote:
Users leaking dns / failing to redirect dns into tor is not a tor problem.
I think that's a rather arrogant point of view. If it was not a Tor
problem, .onion would not be needed in the first place. Tor developers do
seem to
p...@crable.us:
I just received a message from the Free Software Foundation
advising me that Mozilla has climbed in bed with Adobe
Corporation and will implement digital rights management,
DRM, in FireFox. Until now they had not supported DRM.
They claim to take this act to preserve market
On 5/19/2014 6:13 AM, Mike Perry wrote:
snip
Due to the ubiquity of deployment of this scheme, it is likely that this
identifier will soon be abused by all sorts of entities, likely starting
with banking and government sectors, and quickly moving on to the
advertising industry (why not play a
On Mon, May 19, 2014 at 11:24:06AM +0200, pipat...@gmail.com wrote 1.5K bytes
in 0 lines about:
: I think that's a rather arrogant point of view. If it was not a Tor
: problem, .onion would not be needed in the first place. Tor developers do
: seem to work hard on making it difficult for a user
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
On 05/19/2014 06:24 AM, Anders Andersson wrote:
On Mon, May 19, 2014 at 7:06 AM, grarpamp grarp...@gmail.com wrote:
Users leaking dns / failing to redirect dns into tor is not a tor problem.
*** That is a common technologist / U.S. liberal /
The discussion Tor needs a forum is old.
I see two problems on that topic.
1) Tor has no competition
(In the NSA's Tor Stinks presentation, they call Tor the king of
high-secure [sic] low-latency Internet anonymity with no contenders
for the throne in waiting [you find that quote on search
On 5/18/2014 9:54 PM, Roger Dingledine wrote:
And your intuition might be (mine was) that removing those small
relays really harms diversity (and thus anonymity), but actually,
Tor's load balancing and path selection means those relays are very
rarely chosen anyway, so they don't contribute
Greetings,
any plan to introduce support for HTTP2 in TBB given it's nice
opportunistic encryption features?
https://wiki.mozilla.org/Networking/http2
--
Fabio Pietrosanti (naif)
HERMES - Center for Transparency and Digital Human Rights
http://logioshermes.org - http://globaleaks.org -
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Thanks for yuour response, I'm very glad that the topic is not ignored.
The discussion Tor needs a forum is old.
I would never advocate for a forum! Forums are dreadful for a multitude
of objective reasons. My messages are wordy enough, so I'll
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Some people think the only valid / conceivable form
of community / comms on the net are 'forums'.
Well, they're free to set one up.
No pro-forum argument, but one can see why someone would prefer forums
to mailing lists. Some reasons can be
On 5/19/2014 1:26 PM, Akater wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Some people think the only valid / conceivable form
of community / comms on the net are 'forums'.
Well, they're free to set one up.
No pro-forum argument, but one can see why someone would prefer forums
to
14 matches
Mail list logo
