Re: [tor-talk] 2 hop mode for people that only want to use Tor for censorship circumvention to conserve bandwidth and decrease latency?

On 6/12/2016 4:32 PM, T F wrote: Create an Exit Node on your Own IP Adresse. Now any Traffic that is produced on your IP could be done from anyone else. So this could be the best case for you. You surf over the IP of an Tor Exit no latency no Traffic lost! Am 12.06.2016 9:56 nachm. schrieb "gdfg

Re: [tor-talk] Please suggest domain registrats that are Tor (and bitcoin) friendly.

> Here's the point: in a VPS situation, you are, absolutely, at the mercy of > the provider of the VPSes, and possibly to the providers of the data > center. And here's a topical article if you ain't seen it yet: https://it.slashdot.org/story/16/06/11/1247240/bitdefender-finds-hypervisor-wiretap-f

[tor-talk] Tor-Friendly Two-Factor Authentication?

Hi Tor Talkers and Mr. Nobody, you wrote: As far as I know, to implement 2 factor authentication in terms of the codes that many websites have, the only thing you need is to generate random numbers coming from seed that the webpage/bank you want to authenticate to know. This simple setup by no me

Re: [tor-talk] 2 hop mode for people that only want to use Tor for censorship circumvention to conserve bandwidth and decrease latency?

T F: > Create an Exit Node on your Own IP Adresse. Now any Traffic that is > produced on your IP could be done from anyone else. So this could be the > best case for you. You surf over the IP of an Tor Exit no latency no > Traffic lost! 1. It does nothing to circumvent censorship. 2. It's not that

Re: [tor-talk] 2 hop mode for people that only want to use Tor for censorship circumvention to conserve bandwidth and decrease latency?

Create an Exit Node on your Own IP Adresse. Now any Traffic that is produced on your IP could be done from anyone else. So this could be the best case for you. You surf over the IP of an Tor Exit no latency no Traffic lost! Am 12.06.2016 9:56 nachm. schrieb "gdfg dfgf" : > I have read the proposal

Re: [tor-talk] 2 hop mode for people that only want to use Tor for censorship circumvention to conserve bandwidth and decrease latency?

Roman Mamedov: > You don't even need 2 hops in this case. Why not propose 1-hop? I guess you do. A censor can just block all the exit nodes (the Tor network has hardly 1000 exits). It is not going to help you. It's worth to separate bridges and exits so you will be able to replace bridges (which h

Re: [tor-talk] Jake Fan-Fic

No, you are not. Scott Arciszewski Chief Development Officer Paragon Initiative Enterprises On Sat, Jun 11, 2016 at 5:22 PM, Kevin wrote: > Am I the only one who finds this completely distasteful? > > > On 6/11/2016 4:37 PM, dungeonmas...@sigaint.org wrote: > >> The fant

Re: [tor-talk] 2 hop mode for people that only want to use Tor for censorship circumvention to conserve bandwidth and decrease latency?

On Mon, 13 Jun 2016 01:17:08 +0500 Roman Mamedov wrote: > > entry node---> exit node ---> website > > You don't even need 2 hops in this case. Why not propose 1-hop? Oh actually, just remembered reading about that somewhere -- and turns out it was in Tor's own man page: AllowSingleHopCi

Re: [tor-talk] 2 hop mode for people that only want to use Tor for censorship circumvention to conserve bandwidth and decrease latency?

On Sun, 12 Jun 2016 21:56:34 +0200 gdfg dfgf wrote: > I have read the proposal for non hidden .onion services for sites that don't > need anonymity but want to use Tor's end to end encryption and > authentication, for  example Facebook. > > Could the same be done for people that are more inte

[tor-talk] 2 hop mode for people that only want to use Tor for censorship circumvention to conserve bandwidth and decrease latency?

I have read the proposal for non hidden .onion services for sites that don't need anonymity but want to use Tor's end to end encryption and authentication, for  example Facebook. Could the same be done for people that are more interested in censorship circumvention then in anonymity to decreas

[tor-talk] Looking for reputable hosting providers (Tor friendly plus bitcoin).

Hello, I am looking for professionally-managed hosting providers that are Tor-friendly and accept bitcoin. Namecheap is bitcoin friendly but anti-Tor and VPNs. I have noticed that a few hosting providers are somewhat unprofessional probably because they are one-person operations. Any sugge

Re: [tor-talk] Tor-Friendly Two-Factor Authentication?

As far as I know, to implement 2 factor authentication in terms of the codes that many websites have, the only thing you need is to generate random numbers coming from seed that the webpage/bank you want to authenticate to know. This simple setup by no means need to be privacy invading. tor_t...@a

Re: [tor-talk] Which reputable webmail providers function well with Tor?

hi there, missing from the thread, I'd rather include it as a reference http://onionmail.info mostly in Italian (idea was born at hackmeeting.org) as of today counts on 33 servers with approx 15.000 users (I'm not part of this project, just sayin') ciao -- ~.,_ Denis Roio aka Jarom

Re: [tor-talk] Our Response — In Solidarity with Jacob Appelbaum and on the Side of Justice for All

df. wrote: > Would be nice to see a gpg signed copy of this. Maybe, but: Several of the people who have signed this document (according to it) have tweeted links to it, stated that they signed it and asked others to support that document. Cheers, Andreas -- tor-talk mailing list - tor-talk@list

Re: [tor-talk] Our Response — In Solidarity with Jacob Appelbaum and on the Side of Justice for All

Octarina: > > Our Response So this is tor-talk no more, but Appelbaum-Gossip Mailing List. It's ugly when your supporters are mindless and spammers. -- tor-talk mailing list - tor-talk@lists.torproject.org To unsubscribe or change other settings go to https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mai