On 10/19/2016 05:06 AM, Jon Tullett wrote:
> On 18 October 2016 at 03:18, Mirimir wrote:
>> On 10/17/2016 06:50 PM, I wrote:
>>>
Running Tor on Windows makes little sense,
>>>
>>> Didn't Roger ask for more operating system diversity and mention Windows?
>>
>> Maybe
On 18 October 2016 at 03:18, Mirimir wrote:
> On 10/17/2016 06:50 PM, I wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> Running Tor on Windows makes little sense,
>>
>> Didn't Roger ask for more operating system diversity and mention Windows?
>
> Maybe he did. Cite?
>
> But nevertheless, in my opinion,
Tamara West:
> Excuse my ignorance but what exactly must happen for us to get a 64-bit
> hardened Tor Browser for Windows? Not everyone in the world is running
> Linux and not everyone can run Linux at work. I've been wondering about
> this for awhile. Any info would be appreciated. TIA.
>
First
Exact, usually in companies people can not set up softwares, so
Virtualbox is a dream...
And sometimes people can not use USB-Key !
Proxies and others networking security by admins (we can understand
that!) are blocking/logging/filtering web surf. Because for example in
my country, the big boss
Why does everyone keep doing this? Stop thinking about computing only from
your perspective. It doesn't matter the reason why. People will want, will
need a Windows version of Tor. That's why the client already exists. I am
simply asking about getting the best version available to the public. Have
On 10/17/2016 08:19 PM, I wrote:
>> From: miri...@riseup.net
>
>> Maybe he did. Cite?
>
> Did you just invent webcitation?
No, just curious.
--
tor-talk mailing list - tor-talk@lists.torproject.org
To unsubscribe or change other settings go to
> From: miri...@riseup.net
> Maybe he did. Cite?
Did you just invent webcitation?
--
tor-talk mailing list - tor-talk@lists.torproject.org
To unsubscribe or change other settings go to
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-talk
On 10/17/16 21:18, Mirimir wrote:
> On 10/17/2016 06:50 PM, I wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> Running Tor on Windows makes little sense,
>>
>> Didn't Roger ask for more operating system diversity and mention Windows?
>
> Maybe he did. Cite?
>
> But nevertheless, in my opinion, Windows is too snoopy.
>
The
On 10/17/2016 06:50 PM, I wrote:
>
>>
>> Running Tor on Windows makes little sense,
>
> Didn't Roger ask for more operating system diversity and mention Windows?
Maybe he did. Cite?
But nevertheless, in my opinion, Windows is too snoopy.
--
tor-talk mailing list -
>
> Running Tor on Windows makes little sense,
Didn't Roger ask for more operating system diversity and mention Windows?
--
tor-talk mailing list - tor-talk@lists.torproject.org
To unsubscribe or change other settings go to
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-talk
On 10/17/2016 06:08 PM, Tamara West wrote:
> Excuse my ignorance but what exactly must happen for us to get a 64-bit
> hardened Tor Browser for Windows? Not everyone in the world is running
> Linux and not everyone can run Linux at work. I've been wondering about
> this for awhile. Any info would
Excuse my ignorance but what exactly must happen for us to get a 64-bit
hardened Tor Browser for Windows? Not everyone in the world is running
Linux and not everyone can run Linux at work. I've been wondering about
this for awhile. Any info would be appreciated. TIA.
--
tor-talk mailing list -
12 matches
Mail list logo