Thanks Moritz. Most of that sounds good, but seems to leave the quality
tech support issue in limbo (not your personal responsibility).
I'm not being rude & hope I'm not beating a dead horse - just asking,
what's the hold up on such an obvious need, that (apparently) requires
relatively
Hi Joe,
I agree with what you wrote. The topic comes up at every dev meeting,
but we have not found a way to address that problem, or, phrased
differently, it is unclear what path to take.
On 09/28/2016 08:28 PM, Joe Btfsplk wrote:
> For a *technical support list,* why not moderate tor-talk? To
Thanks Moritz. Yes, the reply was helpful. Comments / follow-up
inserted below.
On 9/28/2016 3:01 AM, Moritz Bartl wrote:
Is tor-project list not for fairly advanced users, or bug filers, or
those giving more to the community than just asking questions (but never
contribute useful input)?
> Is tor-project list not for fairly advanced users, or bug filers, or
> those giving more to the community than just asking questions (but never
> contribute useful input)? Or is it only for devs or people providing
> highly technical input (e.g., providing code suggestions or highly
> technical
On 9/26/2016 7:07 PM, Moritz Bartl wrote:
On 09/26/2016 09:02 PM, Joe Btfsplk wrote:
Some may say they still get several tor-talk emails / day and I do, too.
But several current, relevant technical questions I've asked about Tor
issues get no comments.
Questions I'm pretty sure a lot of
On 09/26/2016 09:02 PM, Joe Btfsplk wrote:
> Some may say they still get several tor-talk emails / day and I do, too.
>
> But several current, relevant technical questions I've asked about Tor
> issues get no comments.
> Questions I'm pretty sure a lot of people would be interested in. And
>
On 26/09/16 03:02 PM, Joe Btfsplk wrote:
> But several current, relevant technical questions I've asked about Tor
> issues get no comments.
> Questions I'm pretty sure a lot of people would be interested in. And
> that at least some advanced users would have partial answers or
> suggestions for,
Some may say they still get several tor-talk emails / day and I do, too.
But several current, relevant technical questions I've asked about Tor
issues get no comments.
Questions I'm pretty sure a lot of people would be interested in. And
that at least some advanced users would have partial
> tort...@arcor.de wrote:
>> It depends on what you want to read. If you want some scary rants
>> about Tor and 0 days you might want to read:
>>
>> http://arstechnica.com/security/2016/09/bug-that-hit-firefox-and-tor-browsers-was-hard-to-spot-now-we-know-why/
>> "Bug that hit Firefox and Tor
tort...@arcor.de wrote:
It depends on what you want to read. If you want some scary rants
about Tor and 0 days you might want to read:
http://arstechnica.com/security/2016/09/bug-that-hit-firefox-and-tor-browsers-was-hard-to-spot-now-we-know-why/
"Bug that hit Firefox and Tor browsers was hard
Hello!
Andrew F wrote:
> I ued to get several post a day. Now I get less then a couple a week?
> What is the most active Tor mailing list?
It depends on what you want to read. If you want some scary rants about Tor and
0 days you might want to read:
https://twitter.com/movrcx
e. g.
Conspiracy analysts [un]cover areas coders, users, officials, and
media don't or won't... which can be a useful part of any ecosystem.
They could be considered leakers, but instead of leaking facts,
they present hard questions to be [dis]proved... the limbo area of
untested hypothesis before a
Transparency is key at all levels and on all topics.
Without transparency, Tor will end. It will be a slow degradation.
Tor will loose participants and funding slowly at all level and in all
capacities.
Development will slow and eventually, it will fade.
And who benefits? Not Tor users.
If
On 18 September 2016 at 04:30, grarpamp wrote:
> No it's not just you. Ever since Jakegate / Torgate Tor Project
> Incorporated has seemingly enforced lockdown, censorship, and
> comms hardening, beginning with their own silence and that of those
> they control. A chilling
grarpamp wrote:
On Sat, Sep 17, 2016 at 10:47 PM, Andrew F wrote:
I ued to get several post a day. Now I get less then a couple a week?
No it's not just you. Ever since Jakegate / Torgate Tor Project
Incorporated has seemingly enforced lockdown, censorship, and
We gotta kick it online/make it More active then, we fight fire with fire , if
someone wants censorship we defeat them with crypto, code and other Nice stuff
grarpamp skrev: (18 september 2016 05:30:07 CEST)
>On Sat, Sep 17, 2016 at 10:47 PM, Andrew F
On Sat, Sep 17, 2016 at 10:47 PM, Andrew F wrote:
> I ued to get several post a day. Now I get less then a couple a week?
No it's not just you. Ever since Jakegate / Torgate Tor Project
Incorporated has seemingly enforced lockdown, censorship, and
comms hardening,
I ued to get several post a day. Now I get less then a couple a week?
What is the most active Tor mailing list?
--
--
tor-talk mailing list - tor-talk@lists.torproject.org
To unsubscribe or change other settings go to
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-talk
18 matches
Mail list logo