On Fri, Oct 25, 2013 at 06:01:51PM +1030, DeveloperChris wrote:
An acquittance of mine created a tor exit node, I know little detail
more than that other than he was banned by services such as skype
and ebay. and apparently the machine he used was hacked. Now I know
he is very security
On Fri, Oct 25, 2013 at 12:17:57PM +, Mads Tinggaard Pedersen wrote:
I am a student writing my master's thesis. I am, among other things,
analyzing the degree of anonymity in a network and would like to investigate
real life examples of TOR networks.
However, all I could find is
On Fri, Oct 25, 2013 at 08:54:15PM +0100, e-letter wrote:
Readers,
For some unknown reason, after installing an extension, the firefox
browser failed to start with the tor network activated. The error log
stated something about a port process being open.
Totally depends what extension you
On Fri, Oct 25, 2013 at 05:24:27PM -0400, Nathan Freitas wrote:
On Fri, Oct 25, 2013 at 8:40 PM, Tim Wilson twilson4...@yahoo.com
wrote:
Is there a tor version available for the iphone 5?
Thank you
See the Onion Browser open-source project and iOS app in iTunes. The
best option at the
On Sat, Oct 26, 2013 at 10:25:45AM +1030, DeveloperChris wrote:
I appreciate the links. I am trying to come up to speed in double
quick time. I have some pretty big plans where I hope to convince
lots of people too join Tor. but I cannot in all good conscience, if
it opens them up to any form
Six things I did in September/October 2013:
1) Released Tor 0.2.4.17-rc:
https://lists.torproject.org/pipermail/tor-talk/2013-September/029857.html
including writing the fix to prioritize NTor handshakes so Tor 0.2.4.x
remains usable despite the five million new bot users:
On Sun, Sep 01, 2013 at 10:10:56PM -0400, Roger Dingledine wrote:
On Mon, Sep 02, 2013 at 11:35:22AM +1000, Erik de Castro Lopo wrote:
Hi all,
Heads up on a new paper suggesting that its possible to unmask
Tor users using traffic correlation:
http://www.ohmygodel.com
On Fri, Oct 11, 2013 at 09:45:16PM +0200, Moritz Bartl wrote:
On 10/11/2013 08:32 PM, Rhona Mahony wrote:
Friend J doesn't want to install a Tor Browser Bundle on each of the 50
computers in his company. Can he install one TBB on his router and
configure it so that it sends his employees'
On Mon, Oct 07, 2013 at 06:17:32PM -0400, grarpamp wrote:
But I don't see that initial bump reflected in the below cutoff
field. Though I do think I see fewer entries now than in an earlier
run.
Is CircuitBuildTimeout the right knob?
Should I bump NumEntryGuards and auto-distribute load
Just to start off the new media frenzy thread.
http://www.theguardian.com/world/2013/oct/04/tor-attacks-nsa-users-online-anonymity
http://www.theguardian.com/world/interactive/2013/oct/04/tor-high-secure-internet-anonymity
On Fri, Oct 04, 2013 at 11:38:10AM -0400, Roger Dingledine wrote:
(Did I miss any good links?)
Ah, yes I did:
http://www.theguardian.com/world/2013/oct/04/nsa-gchq-attack-tor-network-encryption
--Roger
--
tor-talk mailing list - tor-talk@lists.torproject.org
To unsusbscribe or change other
On Thu, Oct 03, 2013 at 03:25:23PM -0400, The Doctor wrote:
On 10/03/2013 01:49 PM, Ahmed Hassan wrote:
One question is still remain unanswered. How did they locate
Silkroad server before locating him? They had full image of the
server before his arrest.
Not sure. One hypothesis (and
On Thu, Oct 03, 2013 at 08:12:25AM -0700, Gordon Morehouse wrote:
Here's my one teensy thing that bothers me, this bit of speculation
from Ars Technica:
The Tor Project, whose software enabled the Silk Road, noticed a
significant spike in usage in late August and was unable to explain
it.
On Thu, Oct 03, 2013 at 08:58:57PM +, mirimir wrote:
So they did have the server before they knew who he was.
Careful there -- while I assume they didn't lie in their affidavit, it's
quite reasonable to assume that they investigated all sorts of things,
all sorts of ways, and then afterwards
On Fri, Oct 04, 2013 at 02:11:26AM +, mirimir wrote:
On 10/04/2013 01:54 AM, Juan Garofalo wrote:
I'm wondering if I got this right:
The NSA is supposed to be concerned only with 'national security'
issues and can't spy on 'ordinary Americans'. In practice the NSA spies
on
Tor 0.2.5.1-alpha introduces experimental support for syscall sandboxing
on Linux, allows bridges that offer pluggable transports to report usage
statistics, fixes many issues to make testing easier, and provides
a pile of minor features and bugfixes that have been waiting for a
release of the new
On Thu, Oct 03, 2013 at 01:34:37AM +, mirimir wrote:
Wow. I just read the complaint :8
He was unfathomably stupid. Words cannot express how stupid he was.
This has absolutely no relevance to the Tor network.
We just put up a statement on the blog which basically says that:
On Wed, Oct 02, 2013 at 11:17:08PM -0400, Jonathan D. Proulx wrote:
:https://blog.torproject.org/blog/tor-and-silk-road-takedown
In many ways this is (or should be) a PR win for Tor.
1) No technical vulnerabilities were used (AFAWK) - this should be welcome
news to Tor users
2)
On Wed, Sep 25, 2013 at 05:32:32PM -0400, Nathan Suchy wrote:
Yes. You can download the Tor browser bundle which works fine on all major
linux distributions...
Right.
https://www.torproject.org/projects/torbrowser.html.en#downloads
On Sep 25, 2013 4:31 PM, Robert K kjtre...@rocketmail.com
On Wed, Sep 25, 2013 at 11:17:20PM +0100, Bernard Tyers - ei8fdb wrote:
This is true, but people will use what they can if they have
difficulties. Anything that helps people installed TBB must be useful,
right?
No? As one example, if you're an activist in country X you maybe
shouldn't get TBB
On Mon, Sep 23, 2013 at 01:14:17PM -0700, coderman wrote:
in addition The Tor Project, Inc. there appears to be related:
Tor Solutions Corporation - Tor Solutions Corporation in Walpole, MA
is a private company categorized under Website Design Services. Our
records show it was established in
On Mon, Sep 23, 2013 at 08:24:40PM -0400, David Green wrote:
I have -- for my own reasons -- stopped advancing my OS X machine's OS at
Tiger. I enjoy working with it and doing my small-time programming. I
have been exposed to 'tor' in the recent past and would really like to use
it on my
On Sat, Sep 14, 2013 at 07:36:34PM +0200, Sebastian Pfeifer wrote:
I now upgraded to Version 0.2.4.17-rc but it still crashes somehow, but
without writing anything related to the logfiles.
Sep 14 10:26:05.000 [notice] Performing bandwidth self-test...done.
Sep 14 11:19:58.000 [notice] Circuit
On Wed, Sep 11, 2013 at 10:58:53AM +0100, Graham Todd wrote:
But does it use vanilla Firefox, or one of the variants such as
Iceweasel or IceCat?
Vanilla.
I'm attempting to keep my distro totally free
Vanilla Firefox is free. Unless you count people with trademarks as
non-free, in which case
On Wed, Sep 11, 2013 at 12:50:41PM -0400, Marthin Miller wrote:
1024bit RSA keys which can be cracked in a few hours
I believe this to be false currently.
(But that doesn't mean we shouldn't fix it, because it will become true
some time in the next few decades, and we don't know when that will
On Tue, Sep 10, 2013 at 06:12:40PM -0400, Nathan Suchy wrote:
Because chrome does not use Tor for DNS and that's an issue.
Is there a functional reason Tor uses Firefox for the TBB? I personally
like Chromium, so I have the Tor packages installed in Ubuntu and use that
system wide
On Mon, Sep 09, 2013 at 07:25:06PM +, tagnaq wrote:
I'd like to understand why the exit flag is defined as it is.
The current definition can be found in the directory spec [1]:
Exit -- A router is called an 'Exit' iff it allows exits to at
least two of the ports 80, 443, and 6667
Tor 0.2.4.17-rc is the third release candidate for the Tor 0.2.4.x
series. It adds an emergency step to help us tolerate the massive
influx of users: 0.2.4 clients using the new (faster and safer) NTor
circuit-level handshakes now effectively jump the queue compared to
the 0.2.3 clients using TAP
On Tue, Sep 03, 2013 at 11:06:54PM -0700, Asa Rossoff wrote:
Timeline through August 31
Hi Asa,
Thanks for the timeline! Here are a few notes.
* February, a dramatic, roughly ten-fold decrease in Syrian directly
connnecting Tor users.
This was a censoring event I believe. The vanilla Tor
Six things I did in August 2013:
1) Wrote a security advisory for the Old Tor Browser Bundles
vulnerable issue:
https://lists.torproject.org/pipermail/tor-announce/2013-August/89.html
and then posted it to the blog and helped to manage the confusion there
(700+ comments!)
On Mon, Sep 02, 2013 at 03:22:33PM +, adrelanos wrote:
Roger Dingledine:
And we really should raise the guard rotation period. If you
do their compromise graphs again with guards rotated every nine months,
they look way different.
TBB releases are more frequent than every nine months
On Tue, Sep 03, 2013 at 05:17:49PM +0100, Graham Todd wrote:
Until this year, I was a student at the University of Kent, and you can
find the at:
http://www.kent.ac.uk
where I know some members of the Computer Science Laboratory were very
interested in Tor, which was the reason I got
On Mon, Sep 02, 2013 at 11:35:22AM +1000, Erik de Castro Lopo wrote:
Hi all,
Heads up on a new paper suggesting that its possible to unmask
Tor users using traffic correlation:
http://www.ohmygodel.com/publications/usersrouted-ccs13.pdf
Code here:
http://torps.github.io/
On Sat, Aug 31, 2013 at 12:35:19AM -0400, krishna e bera wrote:
On 13-08-31 12:25 AM, Roger Dingledine wrote:
On Fri, Aug 30, 2013 at 04:29:18PM +, Matt Pagan wrote:
# Configured for speed
Just for the record, the three lines here don't help speed much (or
maybe at all
On Fri, Aug 30, 2013 at 08:41:13AM -0400, Ted Smith wrote:
Until you can find a better funding source in the US than the DoD,
that's a reality we'll all have to live with.
You should try calling your congressperson and asking them to support
legislation to defund the military-industrial
On Sun, Sep 01, 2013 at 03:40:02AM +, mirimir wrote:
On 08/31/2013 08:22 AM, grarpamp wrote:
Are these requests keyed to and counted towards unique clients
whether by ip
Which is another thought, graphs are made from logs. If they're
based on ip, and new ip's are showing up, just
On Fri, Aug 30, 2013 at 04:29:18PM +, Matt Pagan wrote:
# Configured for speed
Just for the record, the three lines here don't help speed much (or
maybe at all).
ExcludeSingleHopRelays 0
This first line says it's ok to use relays that allow you to make one-hop
circuits. Roughly speaking,
On Thu, Aug 29, 2013 at 11:59:55PM -0400, Collin Anderson wrote:
Firstly congratulations Tor; secondly this seems pretty solvable with math
and what not. I downloaded the direct connecting users csv and created a
spreadsheet between the start of the month and the end. It seems that it
was the
On Wed, Aug 28, 2013 at 12:41:58PM -0700, Percy Alpha wrote:
Every client has to download the full list of relays (consensus)
periodically. In areas with little connectivity, this already puts a
high burden on clients.
Griffin pointed out Tor could download only a portion of relays.
Done
Hi folks,
Check out
https://metrics.torproject.org/users.html
(for posterity, the longer-term link will be
https://metrics.torproject.org/users.html?graph=direct-usersstart=2013-05-29end=2013-08-27country=allevents=off#direct-users
)
The number of Tor clients running appears to have doubled
On Mon, Aug 26, 2013 at 05:58:22PM -0500, Missouri Anglers wrote:
I downloaded and installed PirateBrowser which is a Firefox browser
configured to use vidalia/tor.
Not quite -- it is a bundle that includes a variety of software
including Firefox, Vidalia, and Tor, configured in the way they
On Sun, Aug 25, 2013 at 05:05:26PM -0400, hi...@safe-mail.net wrote:
The US feds did actually take down FH, which was a HIDDEN SERVICE! They
found it and arrested the admin! Period!
Reminds me of my response when in 2011 some Dutch police broke into
a hidden service:
On Fri, Aug 23, 2013 at 08:31:26AM -0400, krishna e bera wrote:
On 13-08-23 06:46 AM, ? wrote:
Thanks much Seth for your effort and help but sadly I got the error
Permission denied. I've googled and found
chmod +x start-tor-browser but didn't worked, I think I've to
chmod
On Thu, Aug 22, 2013 at 03:56:27PM -0600, Jim wrote:
ziggy wrote:
I use a service that doesn't allow Tor. But I'd like to use Tor anyway,
except at the end of the path where, hopefully, there is a way to use an
exit that won't be detected as Tor. Is something like that possible?
I'm
On Wed, Aug 14, 2013 at 08:46:32AM -0700, lee colleton wrote:
The packaged version of tor complains about support for faster OpenSSL:
Aug 14 15:26:52.000 [notice] Tor 0.2.4.16-rc (git-dcf6b6d7dda9ffbd)
opening log file.
Aug 14 15:26:52.000 [notice] We were built to run on a 64-bit CPU,
with
On Wed, Aug 14, 2013 at 09:08:03AM -0700, lee colleton wrote:
There's a more serious issue in that my server doesn't appear to be
reachable. I've opened tcp:443,9001 along with the two specifiedobfsproxy
ports
Aug 14 15:26:58.000 [notice] Bootstrapped 100%: Done.
Aug 14 15:26:58.000
Hi folks,
I rewrote our two FAQ entries on JavaScript-in-TBB, and merged them
into one:
https://www.torproject.org/docs/faq#TBBJavaScriptEnabled
Did I leave out any important points, or are there ways to make the
issues clearer?
(Please don't turn this into a you should change the default you
On Sat, Aug 10, 2013 at 07:29:39PM +, Matthew Finkel wrote:
The one thing I always think about when I hear about the comparison of
censorship circumvention vs. anonymity[0] is something I once heard (maybe
from Jake or Roger, I apologies for not having a citation),
Jake and I tried to
On Sat, Aug 10, 2013 at 08:03:38PM +0200, Randolph D. wrote:
urgh, another Firefox mashup?
Well, at least they didn't try to shmush the word Tor into the name.
More power to them, I say.
Though I would also recommend that they get in touch with Mike, Erinn,
and others about the Tor Browser
Tor 0.2.4.16-rc is the second release candidate for the Tor 0.2.4.x
series. It fixes several crash bugs in the 0.2.4 branch.
https://www.torproject.org/dist/
Changes in version 0.2.4.16-rc - 2013-08-10
o Major bugfixes:
- Fix a bug in the voting algorithm that could yield incorrect results
On Fri, Aug 09, 2013 at 06:50:08AM -0400, grarpamp wrote:
here's to hoping TorMail stays dormant...
..I don't agree. It will be a long time before anything
replaces traditional email worldwide.
While I don't really have an opinion on whether this service should stay
dormant, I do hope they
On Thu, Aug 08, 2013 at 08:10:31PM -0400, Webmaster wrote:
anyone know whats going on with tor check?
Sorry, your query failed or an unexpected response was received.
A temporary service outage prevents us from determining if your
source IP address is a Tor https://www.torproject.org/
On Wed, Aug 07, 2013 at 09:28:17AM +0200, Jon Tullett wrote:
is there scope for better communicating to a user
(such as in the Tor browser homepage) that JS is enabled to improve
their browsing experience and enhance privacy, but it may open them to
(another) attack and here's how it can be
On Wed, Aug 07, 2013 at 02:32:47PM +0200, Frithjof wrote:
Neither sha1 sums, nor PGP signatures depend on the file
name of the file to be verified. This allows some kind of replay
attack: If I can get a user to download from my side, I could choose
an old version of the TBB with some known
On Mon, Aug 05, 2013 at 01:27:25AM -0400, grarpamp wrote:
On Sun, Aug 4, 2013 at 12:42 AM, grarpamp grarp...@gmail.com wrote:
Noting what is apparently a very large drop in the number of onions
online. Still checking...
Estimating dropout at about 400 onions or 1/3 of total.
How are you
SUMMARY:
This is a critical security announcement.
An attack that exploits a Firefox vulnerability in JavaScript [1]
has been observed in the wild. Specifically, Windows users using the
Tor Browser Bundle (which includes Firefox plus privacy patches [2])
appear to have been targeted.
Long ago we had a bug where your Tor client would crash or assert
if you configure a public relay to be your bridge:
https://trac.torproject.org/projects/tor/ticket/1776
We think we accidentally got rid of the problem when we switched to the
microdescriptor design in Tor 0.2.3.x.
I've asked Nick
On Mon, Jul 29, 2013 at 10:11:42PM -0400, krishna e bera wrote:
In the last few weeks, i have encountered captchas almost every session
i go onto Youtube. Is this a consequence of the decision to raise the
required bandwidth bar for fast relays, so that more connections come
from fewer exits?
On Fri, Jul 19, 2013 at 01:54:24AM +0200, F Fake wrote:
NSA, Tempora, PRISM And Company can always look who is behind Tor?
No.
They know the real IP of every Tor user every time they use Tor?
Probably not.
Your first question was Can Tor defeat NSA, Tempora, PRISM? and the
answer to that is
On Thu, Jul 18, 2013 at 09:31:21PM -0300, Juan Garofalo wrote:
They know the real IP of every Tor user every time they use Tor?
Probably not.
Why not? Don't they monitor enough internet traffic to know what the
users are doing? Don't all ISPs either work for the NSA, or let the
On Fri, Jul 19, 2013 at 01:09:23AM +, Andrew F wrote:
I read on the tor blog that Hidden services do not scale well and there are
several potential attack vectors on hidden services. Also, they are very
slow.How slow are we talking?
https://trac.torproject.org/projects/tor/ticket/2554
On Sun, Jul 14, 2013 at 11:28:25AM -0700, Mike Perry wrote:
Supposing it is applied does it help to prevent website fingerprinting
to a high extend? (high extend = being costly to circumvent by adversaries)
This was my estimation, too. Against passive adversaries, it should do
quite well,
On Wed, Jul 03, 2013 at 02:05:14PM -0400, Roger Dingledine wrote:
Tor 0.2.4.15-rc is the first release candidate for the Tor 0.2.4.x
series. It fixes a few smaller bugs, but generally appears stable.
Please test it and let us know whether it is!
https://www.torproject.org/dist/
(Next step
On Sat, Jul 13, 2013 at 02:48:40PM -0700, Scott MacLeod wrote:
How does Tor/Vidalia handle the issue of one's computer recording one's own
key strokes unbeknownst to the end user
Not at all. Tor is a socks proxy, and Tor Browser Bundle is that plus
a Firefox fork which, if you use it correctly,
On Sat, Jul 13, 2013 at 08:09:04PM -0400, Gabrielle DiFonzo wrote:
Socks proxy? Firefox fork? Can somebody give me a glossary?
It's great that there are so many new people learning about Tor these
days. But on the other hand, Tor (like security in general) is still
one of those things that takes
On Sat, Jul 06, 2013 at 12:46:17PM +0200, Jens Lechtenboerger wrote:
1. If you are using Tor, you should assume that all your network
traffic gets stored, analyzed, and de-anonymized by intelligence
agencies.
I don't want to tell you to stop worrying, but depending on how much
you think these
On Thu, Jul 04, 2013 at 08:34:35PM -0700, reqrypt wrote:
In a nutshell, TorWall does two things:
1) It (transparently) reroutes all HTTP traffic through the Tor anonymity
network; and
2) It blocks all non-Tor traffic (including DNS) to and from your computer.
Neat!
Bastik pointed out the
On Thu, Jul 04, 2013 at 09:59:11PM +0900, ÀÌÈ¿¼® wrote:
I am making private Tor network which consist of 5 nodes.
So I installed Tor browser to onion proxy and onion routers
I thought that Tor network would be generated, because private network that
I made has three onion routers and a
Tor 0.2.4.15-rc is the first release candidate for the Tor 0.2.4.x
series. It fixes a few smaller bugs, but generally appears stable.
Please test it and let us know whether it is!
https://www.torproject.org/dist/
(Next step is clearly to get more user-usable bundles available with
this version,
On Wed, Jul 03, 2013 at 07:43:47PM +, anonymous coward wrote:
I think for certain things it does not make much sense to use Tor, for
example for online banking. When I connect to my bank I am not anonymous
anway. When I use ebay, I am not anonymous either, they have my adress,
Paypal knows
On Tue, Jul 02, 2013 at 09:27:23PM +, anonymous coward wrote:
Hello,
I start Tor with Vidalia. And I use TorBirdy with Thunderbird.
Sometimes I see a message from Vidalia:
This is from the Vidalia log:
Jul 02 22:34:44.907 Application request to port 143: this port is
commonly used
On Tue, Jul 02, 2013 at 06:45:24PM -0700, Mark Yaler wrote:
Let's say you open webpage X, which automatically refreshes every
minute. But the user doesn't immediately realize this problem.
Variations of this attack are in various research papers, e.g.
Tor 0.2.4.13-alpha fixes a variety of potential remote crash
vulnerabilities, makes socks5 username/password circuit isolation
actually actually work (this time for sure!), and cleans up a bunch
of other issues in preparation for a release candidate.
https://www.torproject.org/dist/
Changes in
On Mon, May 27, 2013 at 06:19:06PM -0700, Micah Lee wrote:
I agree, most of the time leak sites don't need as much anonymity from
hidden services.
See also
https://gitweb.torproject.org/torspec.git/blob/HEAD:/proposals/ideas/xxx-encrypted-services.txt
(especially motivation 2)
--Roger
PETools: Workshop on Privacy Enhancing Tools
July 9, 2013, Bloomington, Indiana, USA
Held in conjunction with PETS 2013
http://petools.soic.indiana.edu/
The goal of this workshop is to discuss the design of privacy tools
aimed at real-world deployments. This workshop will bring together
privacy
On Wed, May 01, 2013 at 06:16:49PM +, Andrew F wrote:
Thanks noel,
Is there a way to sandbox flash and make it safe?
Keep an eye on (and please contribute to!)
https://trac.torproject.org/projects/tor/ticket/7680
and its subtickets.
--Roger
___
On Mon, Apr 29, 2013 at 08:51:32PM +0200, Guido Witmond wrote:
However, given the nature of onion sites, I don't know how the police
investigators could track and take down the source without defeating the
anonymity of Tor.
On Mon, Apr 29, 2013 at 03:30:37PM -0400, Chris Patti wrote:
What about simply scouring all the directories, removing links to the pedo
sites?
Please do!
That said, you're already falling into a trap when you say all the
directories. I know the person who ran the hidden wiki -- he shut
it down
On Sun, Apr 21, 2013 at 05:33:00PM -0500, bgw wrote:
via:
http://mainichi.jp/english/english/newsselect/news/20130418p2a00m0na013000c.html
The National Police Agency (NPA) is poised to urge Internet service
providers to voluntarily block communications if an anonymous software
system
On Mon, Apr 15, 2013 at 04:40:42AM -0400, eli wrote:
Something's been bothering me since I began contributing bandwidth to
the Tor network. Now that I've been running a bridge for awhile and feel
more or less confident of what I'm doing, I guess I can ask what may be
a dumb question.
The
Five things I did in March 2013:
1) Released Tor 0.2.4.11-alpha:
https://lists.torproject.org/pipermail/tor-talk/2013-March/027563.html
2) Attended the tech@state conference in DC, where various groups
that the US State Dept is funding got together to talk. I was on a panel
about circumvention
Tor 0.2.4.11-alpha makes relay measurement by directory authorities
more robust, makes hidden service authentication work again, and
resolves a DPI fingerprint for Tor's SSL transport.
https://www.torproject.org/dist/
Changes in version 0.2.4.11-alpha - 2013-03-11
o Major features (directory
On Wed, Mar 06, 2013 at 01:12:47AM -0600, Anthony Papillion wrote:
I'm involved in a project that will ultimately run a website as a
hidden service. Because of the content if the site (not child porn
or gambling) we're concerned about how easy a Tor connected server
is to find.
Hidden
On Wed, Mar 06, 2013 at 03:46:51PM -0300, Juan Garofalo wrote:
Hidden services are definitely weaker than regular Tor circuits, a)
because the adversary can induce them to speak,
Care to elaborate on that? You mean timing attacks (based on the fact
that hidden servers 'speak' to clients?) ?
On Tue, Mar 05, 2013 at 02:46:28AM +, adrelanos wrote:
So if somehow the time between posting a patch, reviewing a patch and
merging a patch could be reduced, that would be awesome.
That is certainly one of the challenging points. Once upon a time when
there was roughly 1 Tor developer, we
Five things I did in February 2013:
1) Released Tor 0.2.4.10-alpha:
https://lists.torproject.org/pipermail/tor-talk/2013-February/027233.html
2) Explained the remaining items from SponsorF Year3 to Karsten:
https://trac.torproject.org/projects/tor/wiki/org/sponsors/SponsorF/Year3
3) Helped Nick
On Fri, Feb 22, 2013 at 01:08:37AM +0100, Robin Kipp wrote:
Am I just missing something here, or is there really no other wway of
obtaining a 'plain' binary of Tor for Mac OS?
Download the Tor Browser Bundle for OS X, unpack it, and use the Tor
binary that you find inside. (In Linux, it's in the
On Tue, Feb 12, 2013 at 09:11:33AM +, Nathan Freitas wrote:
Does the fact that my actual IP address has changed (say my Tor client
moves from a 3G to a wifi connection), or by extension, by Tor client
has stopped and started, have any impact on the availability of a Hidden
Service I am
Five things I did in January 2013:
1) Continued my rampage to teach law enforcement groups about Tor,
including a US DEA talk, a Dutch regional police talk, a Belgian FCCU
talk, and a Dutch KPN talk; and my parallel rampage to document and
publish the results:
On Mon, Feb 04, 2013 at 07:49:15AM -, ratl...@tormail.org wrote:
Tails 0.16 - Vidalia relays list is blank at start and with continued use
without a refresh.
Bug is identical in previous versions.
https://trac.torproject.org/projects/tor/ticket/6483
It's fixed in Vidalia 0.2.21, but
Tor 0.2.4.10-alpha adds defenses at the directory authority level from
certain attacks that flood the network with relays; changes the queue
for circuit create requests from a sized-based limit to a time-based
limit; resumes building with MSVC on Windows; and fixes a wide variety
of other issues.
On Sun, Feb 03, 2013 at 01:49:50PM +, adrelanos wrote:
I haven't seen TOR Fone discussions on this list. Description (selection
by adrelanos, see TOR Fone homepage [1] for original text).
Ugh! Another project using the Tor name in a confusing way (which
will make people think it is
On Sun, Jan 20, 2013 at 04:28:13PM -0800, Mike Perry wrote:
it's unlikely that the
network could support enough of these tiny relays to actually make any
substantial capacity difference, and they may actually harm overall
performance rather than help it.
See also
Tor 0.2.4.9-alpha provides a quick fix to make the new ntor handshake
work more robustly.
https://www.torproject.org/download
Changes in version 0.2.4.9-alpha - 2013-01-15
o Major bugfixes:
- Fix backward compatibility logic when receiving an embedded ntor
handshake tunneled in a
On Tue, Jan 15, 2013 at 07:28:34PM -0500, Micah Lee wrote:
Are there plans to release the Tor Browser Bundle as a package in Tor's
official repos, e.g. http://deb.torproject.org/torproject.org/?
This would make keeping an up-to-date TBB much more convenient.
It sure would make things more
On Mon, Jan 14, 2013 at 11:23:17PM +0100, Morgan Andreasson wrote:
*The TorBox*
First thought: we try not to mash the word 'Tor' together with generic
other words:
https://www.torproject.org/docs/trademark-faq#combining
See e.g. a previous TorBOX:
http://sourceforge.net/projects/torbox/
*What
Tor 0.2.4.8-alpha introduces directory guards to reduce user enumeration
risks, adds a new stronger and faster circuit handshake, and offers
stronger and faster link encryption when both sides support it.
https://www.torproject.org/download
Changes in version 0.2.4.8-alpha - 2013-01-14
o Major
On Sun, Dec 30, 2012 at 02:55:02AM +, adrelanos wrote:
Telex https://telex.cc/
Circumvention tool. Concept looks promising.
Has never been discussed here. Why not? Does anyone know more?
I am interested what the status and progress is. Unfortunately, my
mailing list subscription
On Wed, Dec 19, 2012 at 02:49:12AM -0800, Mike Perry wrote:
Thus spake Roger Dingledine (a...@mit.edu):
Six big things I did in November:
1) Attended the NSF PI meeting for our new grant (joint with Georgia
Tech and Princeton). Met dozens of professors and renewed connections
Tor 0.2.4.7-alpha introduces a new approach to providing fallback
directory mirrors for more robust bootstrapping; fixes more issues where
clients with changing network conditions refuse to make any circuits;
adds initial support for exiting to IPv6 addresses; resumes being able
to update our
301 - 400 of 542 matches
Mail list logo
