guidof wrote:
> After updating to the latest firmware I got a horrible distortion in the
> upper frequencies. Reverted to an older firmware and everything was fine
> again. Anyone planning to update should perhaps wait until this problem
> is fixed.
>
> Guido F.
I think the horrible one is only
ChipMonk wrote:
> Thanks for the all your comments - I'll look into a re-scan and
> investigate the logs some time soon. I have been slowly tidying up tags
> over the last year or so, but there is probably still some messiness in
> there - my heart isn't really into spending an age on it since it
Thanks for the all your comments - I'll look into a re-scan and
investigate the logs some time soon. I have been slowly tidying up tags
over the last year or so, but there is probably still some messiness in
there - my heart isn't really into spending an age on it since it's of
very limited value
Why do you seem to like doing things the hard way?
The coax SPDIF from the Touch is more than up to the job.
Stratmangler's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=20387
View this thread: http://forums.slim
garym wrote:
> Agree. Has the OP set the scanning log to debug level and looked at the
> logs to see what may be happening.
Yes "clear and rescan everything" should take a long time "scan for new
and changed should be a short thing " .
Unless do you regularly change *all*the files with some oth
guidof wrote:
> Two hours for a scan for new and changed files? Something is quite wrong
> here. Even a slow device takes only a few seconds per album. I suspect
> that LMS is not the culprit.
>
> Guido F.
Agree. Has the OP set the scanning log to debug level and looked at the
logs to see what
Mnyb wrote:
> Weird scan for new and changed only take like 20 seconds if add for
> example 5 new albums ? I only have an 37000 files collection btw ?
Yep, new and changed for me (70k tracks) takes a few short minutes. I
wonder if your long times is because you have a lot of untagged files.
--
ChipMonk wrote:
> Don't I know it! That's exactly what I meant by a full (collection
> rather than folder) rescan. My system is a Tranquil BBS2 Intel Atom
> D510MO 4GB RAM with WHS 2011. Much better than a NAS and great as a
> media server and for home computing backups. But a 70K track collectio
ChipMonk wrote:
> Don't I know it! That's exactly what I meant by a full (collection
> rather than folder) rescan. My system is a Tranquil BBS2 Intel Atom
> D510MO 4GB RAM with WHS 2011. Much better than a NAS and great as a
> media server and for home computing backups. But a 70K track collectio
ufoerp wrote:
> with new firmware Nov 30 2012, Anti mode 2.0 supports SBT much better.
> The most important upgrade is that Asynchronous audio transmission in
> USB mode for improved audio quality!!
After updating to the latest firmware I got a horrible distortion in the
upper frequencies. Rever
ChipMonk wrote:
> Don't I know it! That's exactly what I meant by a full (collection
> rather than folder) rescan. My system is a Tranquil BBS2 Intel Atom
> D510MO 4GB RAM with WHS 2011. Much better than a NAS and great as a
> media server and for home computing backups. But a 70K track collectio
Mnyb wrote:
> Do a "scan for new and changed when adding something" much faster a then
> a complete rescan .
Don't I know it! That's exactly what I meant by a full (collection
rather than folder) rescan. My system is a Tranquil BBS2 Intel Atom
D510MO 4GB RAM with WHS 2011. Much better than a NA
..and I forgot "music folder" is much like actually browsing the folders
on your OS so you can see it that other way around ,the database access
via album and artist is much faster than browsing folders ever can be .
A pity that it is extremely limited and not possible to configure you
cant even b
ChipMonk wrote:
> I accept that the LMS system has been, sadly, designed to work primarily
> through searching Tags. However, for many of us, perhaps especially with
> significant "classical" collections, selection via music folder will
> always be the first choice for much of our listening. As m
I accept that the LMS system has been, sadly, designed to work primarily
through searching Tags. However, for many of us, perhaps especially with
significant "classical" collections, selection via music folder will
always be the first choice for much of our listening. As my collection
grows, it's
peti wrote:
> I'm not a linux freak, but you can google "touchsgotrythm". I make this
> and I got by 16 bit 44 khz a popfree sound. But the sound is very tinny.
> When you will, i can send the files. With winscp you can change the
> files in the touch.
>
> Peter
Thanks for the link, it looks li
jackocleebrown wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I have the rDac and have been using it with the EDO module but not TT3.
>
> I've just installed TT3 and I get clicks and pops too.
>
> I've had a quick play around with the buffer settings from the tt
> command over ssh and also with the buffer settings from
Hello,
I have the rDac and have been using it with the EDO module but not TT3.
I've just installed TT3 and I get clicks and pops too.
I've had a quick play around with the buffer settings from the tt
command over ssh and also with the buffer settings from the EDO "buffer
tuning (experimental)"
with new firmware Nov 30 2012, Anti mode 2.0 supports SBT much better.
The most important upgrade is that Asynchronous audio transmission in
USB mode for improved audio quality!!
ufoerp's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.
jezbo wrote:
> do I need to restore factory settings to remove the custom kernel also?
> .
You need to do a software upgrade for this.
Triode's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=17
View this thread:
Tried this plugin on the one album I have encoded in 24/192, and while
it seemed to be playing, I heard nothing. So for the time being I have
uninstalled it - do I need to restore factory settings to remove the
custom kernel also?
Might try again if anyone could suggest why I heard only silence.
Mnyb wrote:
> +1
>
> Excellent community work with the compatibility list .
>
> https://docs.google.com/spreadsheet/lv?key=0AqiK6WHnz5FHdEtlalVRb29pX3N2WXhfMlAzNmFMZnc
>
> Is there any instructions on how users can add to it ? I do think more
> DAC's than this are tested .
I'd suggest that th
22 matches
Mail list logo
