How can I simply disable phased packages? (I was hit numerous times by
outdated packages, never had problem with update causing problems so for
me this just makes things worse anyway)
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is
Awesome, thank you! Looking forward to it being released
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to dnsmasq in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1981794
Title:
Duplicate/retried DNS queries fail with REFUSED
** Changed in: dnsmasq (Ubuntu Kinetic)
Assignee: (unassigned) => Lena Voytek (lvoytek)
** Changed in: dnsmasq (Ubuntu Jammy)
Assignee: (unassigned) => Lena Voytek (lvoytek)
** Tags added: server-todo
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch
my wpa_supplicant version is 2.9
but, it is not working for me.
iphone se3, ios 15.7
it is not connected. infinite loading.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to wpa in Ubuntu.
I have had the same problem since 20.04. Now on 22.04. for me it is
solved by using deny-interfaces in the avahi-daemon.conf file. I just
eliminate the interfaces that are adding the printers I don't need.
Here I have denied my wifi usb dongle and my ZeroTier network
connection.
** Attachment
The attachment "fix-dns-retry-confusion-jammy.patch" seems to be a
patch. If it isn't, please remove the "patch" flag from the attachment,
remove the "patch" tag, and if you are a member of the ~ubuntu-
reviewers, unsubscribe the team.
[This is an automated message performed by a Launchpad user
Proposed fix: https://github.com/canonical/apport/pull/10
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to apport in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1991200
Title:
apport-cli apport-collect crash AttributeError:
The update that I just made does seem to have fixed the problem that I was
having with GDB when used under VS Code.
Thanks very much for the help!
--
Lowell Boggs
Senior Software Engineer
Amida Technology Solutions, Inc.
m: 214-789-8560
On Thu, Sep 29, 2022 at 5:37 PM Lowell Boggs wrote:
>
I just retested after updating using the pre-release sw setting.
the problem has been fixed.
thank you for your assistance. Please close the ticket as "fixed".
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to gdb in Ubuntu.
I've been asked to prepare a summary of the current status of this bug:
- there's a grub2 security update that's been published and then pulled:
https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/grub2-unsigned/2.06-2ubuntu10/+publishinghistory
thanks, I set the pre-release items on the software updater, and triggered
an update. But I saw nothing about gdb in the things it was going to
update.
Without me telling it to update all packages in the "Updates" menu of
software and updates, how do I make it update the gdb?
Thanks
--
Lowell
Thanks!
--
Lowell Boggs
Senior Software Engineer
Amida Technology Solutions, Inc.
m: 214-789-8560
On Thu, Sep 29, 2022 at 3:55 PM Dave Jones <1990...@bugs.launchpad.net>
wrote:
> It would probably be best to report the crash in the "Software and
> Updates" tool separately against the
** Attachment removed: "Lsusb-t.txt"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/openssh/+bug/1991199/+attachment/5619910/+files/Lsusb-t.txt
** Attachment removed: "Lsusb-v.txt"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/openssh/+bug/1991199/+attachment/5619911/+files/Lsusb-v.txt
**
Sure my concern was the SRUs coming while apt is still phasing and
creating another issue.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to apt in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1990586
Title:
22.04: python3*
@Brian Phasing apt is not an issue, it's only when multiple SRUs depend
on each other that the issues being fixed here actually happen.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to apt in Ubuntu.
When releasing this to -updates it seems to me like we should fully
phase the update rather than having it phase and risking more issues.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to apt in Ubuntu.
It would probably be best to report the crash in the "Software and
Updates" tool separately against the software-properties package
(https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/software-properties).
In the meantime you'll want to select "Pre-released Updates" on the
"Developer Options" tab at the end of
Hello,
Sorry we missed this bug for so long. I can confirm the issue is present
in 22.04 and 22.10 and can be fixed with the commit you provided. I
created a patch file that can be added to 22.04, attached here. I will
mark this bug as confirmed too.
Thanks!
** Patch added:
** Tags added: foundations-todo
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to binutils in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1971901
Title:
dlltool uses non-unique temp filenames
Status in binutils:
Fix Released
Switching the dependency over to PyQt (or PySide?) sounds like something
for the desktop team to look at?
** Tags added: rls-kk-incoming
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to software-properties in
Ubuntu.
Thanks for the strace output. Can you please also attach journal and
dmesg output for a time range that captures this issue?
** Changed in: systemd (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Incomplete
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is
Upon further investigation, the apport exception is caused by ubuntu-
release-upgrader not passing open files to apport correctly.
** Package changed: apport (Ubuntu) => ubuntu-release-upgrader (Ubuntu)
** Changed in: ubuntu-release-upgrader (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided => Medium
**
** Bug watch added: Linux Kernel Bug Tracker #205755
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=205755
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to alsa-driver in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1958019
Title:
(In reply to Marko from comment #694)
> Thanks for the tip Gergo!
> I disable the sound power management with the tlp.service and set the
> i2c-register with a own customboot.service after the tlp.service is started.
> It works for now :o)
>
> /root/bass-speaker-on.sh
> #!/usr/bin/env bash
>
(In reply to Marko from comment #691)
> (In reply to Gergo K from comment #689)
> > The TAS2563 works without the firmware (tuning file).
> > Documentation:
> > https://www.ti.com/product/TAS2553
> >
> > However there is an android driver with firmware loading support.
> >
Thanks for the tip Gergo!
I disable the sound power management with the tlp.service and set the
i2c-register with a own customboot.service after the tlp.service is started.
It works for now :o)
/root/bass-speaker-on.sh
#!/usr/bin/env bash
/usr/sbin/i2cset -y 3 0x48 0x2 0
** Merge proposal linked:
https://code.launchpad.net/~enr0n/ubuntu-release-upgrader/+git/ubuntu-release-upgrader/+merge/430690
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to apport in Ubuntu.
Public bug reported:
My RPi4's are having their rootvg on iSCSI and boot from them. The
kernel modules etc are in the initramfs. However since 22.04 the
initramfs is not generated corrected and while booting from it it
results in error messages stating various binaries/scripts are not
locatable.
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 1842320 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1842320
Same issue occurs when using Ubuntu live boot 22.04 on a HP Elitebook
850 G8.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to
Ah, you might want to do systemd first, if a reboot isn't desirable.
If a reboot is fine, then maybe also just check again after reboot,
in case it's a transient system condition unrelated to the upgrades.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded
> ... from systemd 237-3ubuntu10.53 to 237-3ubuntu10.56
> and are experiencing some performance issues.
> A kernel upgrade also happened (4.15.0.192.177 -> 4.15.0.193.178)
> but I thought I'd check here first.
> Sorry if I'm raising this in the wrong place!
Thanks for the bug report!
No
** Tags removed: foundations-todo
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to systemd in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1959475
Title:
"machinectl shell" connections immediately terminated
Status in systemd
** Tags removed: foundations-todo
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to systemd in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1975667
Title:
systemd-resolved does not reset DNS server and search domain list
** Tags removed: foundations-todo
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to systemd in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1979951
Title:
127.0.0.1/::1 removed from loopback interface if you configure extra
IPs
** Tags removed: verification-needed
** Tags removed: verification-needed-jammy
** Tags added: verification-done-jammy
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to binutils in Ubuntu.
Fix in bug 1990705?
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to network-manager in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1990891
Title:
after today's Kinetic updates, WiFi no longer working, so laptop
basically
You can't uninstall wpasupplicant because that removes ubuntu-desktop.
Removing /etc/NetworkManager/conf.d/iwd.conf works though.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to network-manager in Ubuntu.
This discussion needs to be taken upstream, it's not our place to decide
what is right.
** Tags removed: rls-kk-incoming
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to bash in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1097467
** Tags removed: rls-jj-incoming
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to apt in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1990586
Title:
22.04: python3* mismatched phasing breaks dist-upgrades
Status in apt package
** Tags removed: foundations-triage-discuss
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to apt in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1991139
Title:
prompted to remove systemd-hwe-hwdb but re-installed via updates
** Tags removed: rls-kk-incoming
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to software-properties in
Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1990429
Title:
software-properties uses deprecated apt-key
Status in
** Changed in: network-manager (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided => Critical
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to network-manager in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1990891
Title:
after today's Kinetic
This bug is missing log files that will aid in diagnosing the problem.
While running an Ubuntu kernel (not a mainline or third-party kernel)
please enter the following command in a terminal window:
apport-collect 1991285
and then change the status of the bug to 'Confirmed'.
If, due to the
--- Comment From manjunath.ma...@ibm.com 2022-09-29 10:33 EDT---
The issue was reproduced on Ubuntu 22.04
---uname output---
Linux 5.15.0-48-generic #54-Ubuntu SMP Fri Aug 26 13:27:34 UTC 2022 ppc64le
ppc64le ppc64le GNU/Linux
?Steps to recreate ---
install the following packages
dpkg
Thanks, uploaded :)
** Changed in: p11-kit (Ubuntu)
Status: In Progress => Fix Committed
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to p11-kit in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1991067
Title:
p11-kit
To me it looks like the boot-and-services sub-tests got a lot less
reliable on armhf in Focal. The previous systemd version had a higher
chance of passing those. There always was root-unittests which required
multiple attempts. But now from about 10 attempts there was one which
had root-unittests
Public bug reported:
This is a scripted bug report about ADT failures while running systemd
tests for linux/5.4.0-128.144 on focal. Whether this is caused by the
dep8 tests of the tested source or the kernel has yet to be determined.
Testing failed on:
armhf:
** Patch added: "openssh_9.0p1-1ubuntu7.debdiff"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/openssh/+bug/1991199/+attachment/5620047/+files/openssh_9.0p1-1ubuntu7.debdiff
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to
** Changed in: zlib (Ubuntu Kinetic)
Importance: Medium => High
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to zlib in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1990379
Title:
[UBUNTU 20.04] zlib: inflate() does not
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 1966418 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1966418
Status changed to 'Confirmed' because the bug affects multiple users.
** Changed in: gnome-online-accounts (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Confirmed
--
You received this bug notification because you are a
** Tags added: ssh-socket-activation
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to openssh in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1990863
Title:
conversion from sshd service to socket is too bumpy
Status in openssh
** Tags added: socket-activation ssh
** Tags removed: socket-activation ssh
** Tags added: ssh-socket-activation
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to systemd in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1991199
Public bug reported:
On Jammy and earlier, simply running "sshd -i" worked.
Now, it fails silently, and running it with "-d" gives me:
Missing privilege separation directory: /run/sshd
This directory is normally created with "RuntimeDirectory=sshd" as
defined in
I see the problem in openssh-server.postinst. When only a non-default
Port is used (and ListenAddress is left alone), the temporary
addresses.conf.new file is never moved to it's final location. So, when
the ListenStream= line is appended to the final file, the
'[Socket] ...' portion is not there.
This drop-in is generated by openssh-server.postinst, and systemd is
correctly rejecting the drop-in without a [Socket] section.
** Changed in: systemd (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Invalid
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is
Updated debdiff that improves patch series order, changes the version
number to *ubuntu2 and adds DEP3 headers to the patch.
** Patch added: "lp-1991067.diff"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/p11-kit/+bug/1991067/+attachment/5620011/+files/lp-1991067.diff
--
You received this bug
as the deb is removed from jammy proposed, change back to confimed
** Changed in: fwupd (Ubuntu Jammy)
Status: Fix Committed => Confirmed
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to systemd in Ubuntu.
Public bug reported:
We've recently upgraded packages on one of our images from systemd
237-3ubuntu10.53 to 237-3ubuntu10.56 and are experiencing some
performance issues. A kernel upgrade also happened (4.15.0.192.177 ->
4.15.0.193.178) but I thought I'd check here first. Sorry if I'm raising
** Description changed:
- the intel sound card is not detected and only "dummy output" is
- available
+ [Solution ]
+
+ The complete recipe based on 5.19 is here
+ https://github.com/thesofproject/linux/wiki/ES8336-support
+
+ Hope that 6.0 mainline will work ...
+
+ [Original bug report ]
+
** Also affects: zlib (Ubuntu Kinetic)
Importance: Medium
Status: In Progress
** Also affects: zlib (Ubuntu Jammy)
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
** Also affects: zlib (Ubuntu Focal)
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
** Changed in: zlib (Ubuntu Focal)
Interestingly, somebody found a workaround; see
https://github.com/PJungkamp/yoga9-linux/issues/8.
** Bug watch added: github.com/PJungkamp/yoga9-linux/issues #8
https://github.com/PJungkamp/yoga9-linux/issues/8
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch
Tests have passed successfully for 2.4.8 on all architectures (except
i386, which is expected):
(276/290) Testcase test-ubuntu-bug-1990586: W: Ignoring failure of dpkg
--add-architecture as it is likely due to pkg-config-dpkghook (see #824774)
P P
** Tags removed: verification-needed
It seems the autopkgtest runs have finished for 2.4.8 as well, and all
passed, so marking as verified once again.
For those stalking the test logs,
(239/290) Testcase test-phased-updates-upgrade: W: Ignoring failure of dpkg
--add-architecture as it is likely due to pkg-config-dpkghook (see
Sadly apport-cli itself has zero test coverage.
** Also affects: apport
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
** Changed in: apport
Status: New => Triaged
** Changed in: apport
Importance: Undecided => High
** Changed in: apport
Milestone: None => 2.24.0
--
You received
** Changed in: p11-kit (Ubuntu)
Assignee: (unassigned) => Simon Chopin (schopin)
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to p11-kit in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1991067
Title:
p11-kit
Thanks for reporting this bug. The subprocess.run in ui_update_view (in
apport-cli) needs to use "input" as parameter instead of "stdin". We
need test coverage for this.
** Changed in: apport (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided => High
** Changed in: apport (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Triaged
elatllat no that's non-sense on multiple levels
a) the grub update is not phasing anymore so it's not reproducing the bug, we
bumped it back to proposed. There's no phasing there so it just works anyway
b) setting the option in the config file would work around the bug too. Of
course you added
** Attachment added: "acpidump.txt"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1991199/+attachment/5619919/+files/acpidump.txt
** Information type changed from Private to Public
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to
apport information
** Attachment added: "ProcEnviron.txt"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1991200/+attachment/5619904/+files/ProcEnviron.txt
** Information type changed from Private to Public
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages,
# apport-collect 1991200
*** Collecting problem information
The collected information can be sent to the developers to improve the
application. This might take a few minutes.
...
*** Send problem report to the developers?
After the problem report has been sent, please fill out
Public bug reported:
apport-collect crashed.
# lsb_release -rd
Description:Ubuntu Kinetic Kudu (development branch)
Release:22.10
# apt-cache policy apport
apport:
Installed: 2.23.0-0ubuntu2
Candidate: 2.23.0-0ubuntu2
Version table:
*** 2.23.0-0ubuntu2 500
500
> what happens in terms of the migration from ssh service to socket when
the user opts to install the vendor version of sshd_config as a result
of the merge conflict
I upgraded today 2022-09-29 and installing the vendor version is not
intended to break the port settings because there's a
Public bug reported:
The automatic migration script from jammy to kinetic generates a invalid
file for sshd that systemd refuses to read. Manual addition of two lines
is required for a functional sshd with a custom port.
This bug can be considered the opposite of
73 matches
Mail list logo
