[Touch-packages] [Bug 2059723] Re: Please delete libmagic1 1:5.45-2 from the archive (in favor of libmagic1t64 1:5.45-3)

2024-04-10 Thread Anders Kaseorg
Seems resolved. ** Changed in: file (Ubuntu) Status: New => Fix Released -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to file in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2059723 Title: Please delete libmagic1

[Touch-packages] [Bug 2059723] Re: Please delete libmagic1 1:5.45-2 from the archive (in favor of libmagic1t64 1:5.45-3)

2024-04-03 Thread Anders Kaseorg
Same problem is back now that 1:5.45-3build1 is uploaded and 1:5.45-2 still isn’t deleted. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to file in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2059723 Title: Please delete

[Touch-packages] [Bug 2059723] Re: Please delete libmagic1 1:5.45-2 from the archive (in favor of libmagic1t64 1:5.45-3)

2024-03-30 Thread Anders Kaseorg
It seems like 1:5.45-3 was deleted instead of 1:5.45-2? That resolves the immediate issue, I guess, but it’s probably not the intended resolution. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to file in Ubuntu.

[Touch-packages] [Bug 2059723] [NEW] Please delete libmagic1 1:5.45-2 from the archive (in favor of libmagic1t64 1:5.45-3)

2024-03-28 Thread Anders Kaseorg
Public bug reported: As part of the 64-bit time_t transition, libmagic1 was renamed to libmagic1t64 in https://bugs.debian.org/1063113. However, libmagic1 1:5.45-2 is still in the archive, despite being non-installable: # apt-get install libmagic1 Reading package lists... Done Building

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1960608] Re: python-pip >= 21.3.1+dfsg-3 fails pip3-root.sh autopkgtest with python3.10

2022-03-07 Thread Anders Kaseorg
This new sysconfig-debian-schemes.diff has broken virtual environments (venv and virtualenv). Please take a look at the fix in https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/python3.10/+bug/1962791. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1953301] Re: Segfault on AArch64 caused by OpenSSL affecting numerous packages

2022-03-05 Thread Anders Kaseorg
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 1951279 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1951279 ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 1951279 OpenSSL 1.1.1f raise a segmentation faults on Arm64 builds -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded

[Touch-packages] [Bug 47958] Re: ssh-agent clobbers LD_LIBRARY_PATH and other environment variables

2022-02-17 Thread Anders Kaseorg
** Changed in: openssh (Ubuntu) Status: Fix Released => Confirmed -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to openssh in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/47958 Title: ssh-agent clobbers LD_LIBRARY_PATH

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1782577] Re: docker: impossible to create image with python3 because tzdata

2019-05-22 Thread Anders Kaseorg
** Bug watch added: Debian Bug tracker #929417 https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=929417 ** Also affects: debconf (Debian) via https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=929417 Importance: Unknown Status: Unknown ** Also affects: debconf (Ubuntu)

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1792544] Re: demotion of pcre3 (8.x) a.k.a pcre (without the 3) in favor of pcre2 (10.x)

2019-05-01 Thread Anders Kaseorg
The situation with apache2 is what I documented in https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/pcre3/+bug/1792544/comments/9: “But since we’re apparently gathering information here: although Apache 2.4.x does not support PCRE2, Apache trunk does support PCRE2 as of r1773454. (As you can see, this

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1792745] Re: NetworkManager crashed with SIGSEGV in _int_malloc()

2018-11-04 Thread Anders Kaseorg
** Changed in: network-manager (Ubuntu) Status: Fix Committed => Fix Released -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to network-manager in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1792745 Title: NetworkManager

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1792745] Re: NetworkManager crashed with SIGSEGV in _int_malloc()

2018-10-03 Thread Anders Kaseorg
1.12.4 is in cosmic-proposed now with the upstream fix. ** Changed in: network-manager (Ubuntu) Status: In Progress => Fix Committed ** Changed in: network-manager (Ubuntu) Assignee: Anders Kaseorg (andersk) => (unassigned) -- You received this bug notification becau

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1792745] Re: NetworkManager crashed with SIGSEGV in _int_malloc()

2018-10-02 Thread Anders Kaseorg
(Still waiting on sponsorship, but apparently “In Progress” is the right status for that.) ** Changed in: network-manager (Ubuntu) Status: Confirmed => In Progress ** Changed in: network-manager (Ubuntu) Assignee: (unassigned) => Anders Kaseorg (andersk) ** Tags added: patch

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1792745] Re: NetworkManager crashed with SIGSEGV in _int_malloc()

2018-09-24 Thread Anders Kaseorg
** Patch added: "rebased on 1.12.2-0ubuntu5" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/network-manager/+bug/1792745/+attachment/5192582/+files/network-manager_1.12.2-0ubuntu5_lp1792745.debdiff -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages,

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1792745] Re: NetworkManager crashed with SIGSEGV in _int_malloc()

2018-09-22 Thread Anders Kaseorg
-- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to network-manager in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1792745 Title: NetworkManager crashed with SIGSEGV in _int_malloc() Status in NetworkManager: Unknown Status in

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1792745] Re: NetworkManager crashed with SIGSEGV in _int_malloc()

2018-09-22 Thread Anders Kaseorg
** Patch added: "debdiff adding upstream patch" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/network-manager/+bug/1792745/+attachment/5191867/+files/network-manager_1.12.2-0ubuntu4_lp1792745.debdiff -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages,

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1792745] Re: NetworkManager crashed with SIGSEGV in _int_malloc()

2018-09-21 Thread Anders Kaseorg
** Bug watch added: GNOME Bug Tracker #797136 https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=797136 ** Also affects: network-manager via https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=797136 Importance: Unknown Status: Unknown -- You received this bug notification because you are a

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1792544] Re: demotion of pcre3 in favor of pcre2

2018-09-18 Thread Anders Kaseorg
Likewise, nginx does not support PCRE2: https://trac.nginx.org/nginx/ticket/720 ** Bug watch added: trac.nginx.org/nginx/ #720 http://trac.nginx.org/nginx/ticket/720 ** Changed in: nginx (Ubuntu) Status: Triaged => Incomplete -- You received this bug notification because you are a

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1792544] Re: demotion of pcre3 in favor of pcre2

2018-09-18 Thread Anders Kaseorg
Note to those filing upstream bugs: probably don’t call the old library “pcre3” since that’s not a thing outside Debian/Ubuntu. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to grep in Ubuntu.

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1792544] Re: demotion of pcre3 in favor of pcre2

2018-09-18 Thread Anders Kaseorg
I think that completes the analysis of the current state of things. Although it seems infeasible to demote PCRE at this time, there’s no reason that should block the promotion of PCRE2, especially seeing as a bundled copy of PCRE2 is already in main (18.04 and 18.10) via libqt5core5a. ** Changed

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1792544] Re: demotion of pcre3 in favor of pcre2

2018-09-18 Thread Anders Kaseorg
• Quagga: no PCRE2 support • Rasqal: no PCRE2 support • S-Lang: no PCRE2 support ** Changed in: quagga (Ubuntu) Status: New => Incomplete ** Changed in: rasqal (Ubuntu) Status: New => Incomplete ** Changed in: slang2 (Ubuntu) Status: New => Incomplete -- You received this

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1792544] Re: demotion of pcre3 in favor of pcre2

2018-09-18 Thread Anders Kaseorg
• pam_mount: no PCRE2 support • nmap: no PCRE2 support • postfix: no PCRE2 support, http://postfix.1071664.n5.nabble.com/Plans-for-using-PCRE-v2-in-Postfix-td83200.html • pyScss: no PCRE2 support ** Changed in: libpam-mount (Ubuntu) Status: New => Incomplete ** Changed in: nmap (Ubuntu)

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1792544] Re: demotion of pcre3 in favor of pcre2

2018-09-18 Thread Anders Kaseorg
• Aide: no PCRE2 support • Exim: no PCRE2 support, upstream bug: https://bugs.exim.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1878 • FreeRADIUS: no PCRE2 support, mentioned in passing: https://github.com/FreeRADIUS/freeradius-server/issues/1865 • GLib: no PCRE2 support • grep: no PCRE2 support ** Bug watch added:

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1792544] Re: demotion of pcre3 in favor of pcre2

2018-09-18 Thread Anders Kaseorg
Copying from https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/pcre2/+bug/163/comments/20, HAProxy and SELinux upstream support PCRE2. https://git.haproxy.org/?p=haproxy.git;a=commitdiff;h=f2592b29f13907ddf2bba42d00bc41cb8ee5b69b

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1792544] Re: demotion of pcre3 in favor of pcre2

2018-09-18 Thread Anders Kaseorg
Andreas: No, it’s not a bug. PCRE2 is a new project that’s not intended to be compatible with the older PCRE (i.e. what Debian misnamed “pcre3”). The API is completely different and this is expected. See bug 163 for context, and specifically the PCRE2 release announcement linked in the bug

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1792544] Re: demotion of pcre3 in favor of pcre2

2018-09-18 Thread Anders Kaseorg
apr-util has a false Build-Depends on libpcre3-dev; it should simply be dropped. A corresponding Depends was already dropped in https://bugs.debian.org/757140. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to grep in Ubuntu.

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1792745] Re: NetworkManager crashed with SIGSEGV in _int_malloc()

2018-09-15 Thread Anders Kaseorg
It seems suspicious that cb_data->concheck.curl_ehandle is cleaned up here despite the comment a few lines above warning that it’s unsafe to do so. https://github.com/NetworkManager/NetworkManager/blob/1.12.2/src/nm- connectivity.c#L190-L213 /* Contrary to what cURL manual claim

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1792745] Re: NetworkManager crashed with SIGSEGV in _int_malloc()

2018-09-15 Thread Anders Kaseorg
Here’s a valgrlind log showing many invalid writes to freed addresses in cb_data_free → curl_multi_remove_handle and nm_connectivity_check_start → curl_multi_add_handle, which could explain the heap corruption. ** Attachment added: "nm.19802.log"

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1792745] Re: NetworkManager crashed with SIGSEGV in _int_malloc()

2018-09-15 Thread Anders Kaseorg
** Information type changed from Private to Public -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to network-manager in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1792745 Title: NetworkManager crashed with SIGSEGV in

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1780680] Re: Older version in bionic than in xenial

2018-08-22 Thread Anders Kaseorg
Older versions in bionic than in xenial, as of now: fuse-umfuse-ext2 0.4-1.1ubuntu0.1 < 0.4-1.1ubuntu0.16.04.1 linux-meta-azure 4.15.0.1021.21 < 4.15.0.1021.27 linux-meta-gcp 4.15.0.1017.19 < 4.15.0.1017.29 ** Summary changed: - Older version in artful than in xenial + Older version in bionic

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1780680] Re: Older version in artful than in xenial

2018-07-08 Thread Anders Kaseorg
** Description changed: These packages have an older version in artful than in xenial. fuse-umfuse-ext2 0.4-1.1ubuntu0.1 < 0.4-1.1ubuntu0.16.04.1 libclc 0.2.0+git20170330-3 < 0.2.0+git20180312-1~16.04.1 libdrm 2.4.83-1 < 2.4.91-2~16.04.1 mesa 17.2.8-0ubuntu0~17.10.1 <

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1772607] Re: Mesa 18.0.5 stable release

2018-07-08 Thread Anders Kaseorg
Until this is uploaded to bionic, the version in bionic is older than in xenial (bug 1780680), which is going to interfere with upgrades. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to mesa in Ubuntu.

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1780680] [NEW] Older version in artful than in xenial

2018-07-08 Thread Anders Kaseorg
Public bug reported: These packages have an older version in artful than in xenial. fuse-umfuse-ext2 0.4-1.1ubuntu0.1 < 0.4-1.1ubuntu0.16.04.1 libclc 0.2.0+git20170330-3 < 0.2.0+git20180312-1~16.04.1 libdrm 2.4.83-1 < 2.4.91-2~16.04.1 mesa 17.2.8-0ubuntu0~17.10.1 < 18.0.5-0ubuntu0~16.04.1 patch

[Touch-packages] [Bug 520546] Re: Alt-f2 switches to virtual terminal 2

2018-04-05 Thread Anders Kaseorg
** Changed in: console-setup (Ubuntu) Status: Invalid => Confirmed -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to console-setup in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/520546 Title: Alt-f2 switches to virtual

[Touch-packages] [Bug 520546] Re: Alt-f2 switches to virtual terminal 2

2018-04-04 Thread Anders Kaseorg
Just because DISPLAY isn’t set for the current process doesn’t mean X or Wayland aren’t running. For example: pkexec env DEBIAN_FRONTEND=noninteractive dpkg-reconfigure keyboard- configuration still triggers this bug (because pkexec does not propagate environment variables), and you can imagine

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1624320] Re: systemd-resolved appends 127.0.0.53 to resolv.conf alongside existing entries

2018-01-26 Thread Anders Kaseorg
On my bionic system, I had to manually remove resolvconf on account of bug 1713457. I think it was not being autoremoved because other packages like isc-dhcp-client, pppconfig, vpnc-scripts have Suggests: resolvconf. So I don’t think I’m seeing this particular issue. However, the lack of

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1449001] Re: systemd-resolved: please do not use Google public DNS by default

2017-10-09 Thread Anders Kaseorg
Verified using ubuntu-17.04-desktop-amd64.iso. ** Tags removed: verification-needed verification-needed-zesty ** Tags added: verification-done verification-done-zesty -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to systemd

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1713457] [NEW] DNS search domain not removed from resolv.conf on disconnect

2017-08-28 Thread Anders Kaseorg
Public bug reported: When I connect to a wireless network that sets a DNS search domain name via DHCP, the line 'search ' is added to /etc/resolv.conf as expected. But if I then disconnect and connect to a different network, it is not removed from resolv.conf. If the second network also sets a

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1449001] Re: systemd-resolved: please do not use Google public DNS by default

2017-06-21 Thread Anders Kaseorg
** Also affects: systemd (Debian) via http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=761658 Importance: Unknown Status: Unknown ** Changed in: systemd Importance: Unknown => Undecided ** Changed in: systemd Status: Fix Released => New ** Changed in: systemd Remote

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1537635] Re: Reduce zlib compression level for massive performance increase

2017-05-21 Thread Anders Kaseorg
Ping? It’s still really frustrating to have the entire system go unresponsive for a minute just because gnome-shell crashed and apport won’t let it restart until it’s finished compressing the core dump. If you’re not willing to go all the way to zlib level 1, can we at least proceed with going

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1449001] Re: systemd-resolved: please do not use Google public DNS by default

2017-05-17 Thread Anders Kaseorg
In fact, having recently disabled FallbackDNS for myself, I find that I get no DNS at all maybe a quarter of the time I reboot my system. This suggests that systemd-resolved might be silently relying on the 8.8.8.8 fallback much more often than even I suggested above. Can we try disabling

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1685045] Re: stop using libnss_resolve.so for name resolution

2017-05-12 Thread Anders Kaseorg
Dimitri: It is not merely difficult, but in fact fundamentally impossible, to make everyone use nss_resolve for DNS resolution. Many programs cannot use nsswitch for DNS at all. This includes anything that needs to lookup record types other than A and (e.g. SRV, TXT, MX, SSHFP, AFSDB),

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1647031] Re: systemd-resolved’s 127.0.0.53 server does not follow CNAME records

2017-04-14 Thread Anders Kaseorg
Martin, was the DNSSEC=allow-downgrade default not switched off for the 17.04 stable release like you said it would? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to network-manager in Ubuntu.

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1676115] Re: systemd-resolved spams the system log with useless “Processing query...” messages

2017-03-26 Thread Anders Kaseorg
Ah, zesty still has 232-19 but this is presumably fixed in zesty- proposed’s 232-21ubuntu1. ** Changed in: systemd (Ubuntu) Status: Incomplete => Fix Committed -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to systemd

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1676115] [NEW] systemd-resolved spams the system log with useless “Processing query...” messages

2017-03-25 Thread Anders Kaseorg
Public bug reported: If you are running ‘journalctl -f’ to try to debug some other problem, you are constantly interrupted by zillions of these messages from systemd-resolved: Mar 26 00:53:27 change-mode systemd-resolved[1391]: Processing query... Mar 26 00:53:27 change-mode

[Touch-packages] [Bug 520546] Re: Alt-f2 switches to virtual terminal 2

2017-03-14 Thread Anders Kaseorg
Carl: I’m not sure whether that “@Andres” was directed at Andreas or me (I’m Anders), but I still believe the situation is explained by my comments #31 and #33; it is not a mystery why this is seen only occasionally. The bug is triggered every time the console-setup package is installed or

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1647031] Re: systemd-resolved’s 127.0.0.53 server does not follow CNAME records

2017-01-03 Thread Anders Kaseorg
Steve: I didn’t test yakkety since I thought it had gone back to the configuration with dnsmasq on 127.0.0.1 rather than systemd-resolved on 127.0.0.53. If that’s not the case, then yeah, it would be affected too. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1624317] Re: systemd-resolved breaks VPN with split-horizon DNS

2016-12-18 Thread Anders Kaseorg
Ognjen, Vincent: This bug is marked with the “resolved” _tag_, as in “systemd-resolved”, not as in “fixed”. The bug _status_ is still open (Confirmed). -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to systemd in Ubuntu.

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1647031] Re: systemd-resolved’s 127.0.0.53 server does not follow CNAME records

2016-12-14 Thread Anders Kaseorg
Or virtual machines: a VM running in virt-manager on a zesty host can’t resolve CNAMEs (not even a zesty VM with libnss-resolve inside!). -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to systemd in Ubuntu.

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1647031] Re: systemd-resolved’s 127.0.0.53 server does not follow CNAME records

2016-12-14 Thread Anders Kaseorg
Another case that now necessarily relies on 127.0.0.53 is anything inside a chroot (e.g. sbuild). libnss-resolve can’t help there: you can’t talk to the host D-Bus from inside, and also you might want to chroot a distro that’s too old for libnss-resolve anyway. -- You received this bug

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1649370] [NEW] libnss-{resolve,myhostname} don’t install correctly if previously removed without being purged

2016-12-12 Thread Anders Kaseorg
Public bug reported: # grep hosts /etc/nsswitch.conf hosts: files myhostname dns # apt install libnss-resolve # grep hosts /etc/nsswitch.conf hosts: files myhostname resolve [!UNAVAIL=return] dns # apt remove libnss-resolve # grep hosts /etc/nsswitch.conf hosts: files

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1647031] Re: systemd-resolved’s 127.0.0.53 server does not follow CNAME records

2016-12-12 Thread Anders Kaseorg
Whether or not it’s enabled, it is started automatically via D-BUS activation (/lib/systemd/system/dbus-org.freedesktop.resolve1.service -> systemd-resolved.service). -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to systemd in

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1647031] Re: systemd-resolved’s 127.0.0.53 server does not follow CNAME records

2016-12-12 Thread Anders Kaseorg
Firefox, wget, ping, and Chrome do not work unless libnss-resolve is installed. (Perhaps Chrome recently started using NSS in some cases?) Maybe this isn’t quite as critical as I thought given that ubuntu- standard Recommends libnss-resolve. Still, it’s not just an “implementation detail”. DNS

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1624320] Re: systemd-resolved appends 127.0.0.53 to resolv.conf alongside existing entries

2016-12-10 Thread Anders Kaseorg
Martin: I still wonder what the point of having resolvconf is, if it’s only ever supposed to be used to manage 127.0.0.53, and every other use of resolvconf will lead to this bug resurfacing. I still propose that systemd-resolved should read from /run/resolvconf/resolv.conf without adding

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1647178] Re: systemd-resolved unable to resolve certain subdomains

2016-12-10 Thread Anders Kaseorg
Possible duplicate of bug 1647031. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to systemd in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1647178 Title: systemd-resolved unable to resolve certain subdomains Status in systemd

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1647178] Re: systemd-resolved unable to resolve certain subdomains

2016-12-10 Thread Anders Kaseorg
For example, I see $ dig +no{cmd,comments,stats} mail.google.com @8.8.8.8 ;mail.google.com. IN A mail.google.com.86312 IN CNAME googlemail.l.google.com. googlemail.l.google.com. 212IN A 216.58.219.229 $ dig +no{cmd,comments,stats} mail.google.com

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1648037] Re: Ubuntu 16.10: systemd-resolved does not resolve some domains

2016-12-10 Thread Anders Kaseorg
Possible duplicate of bug 1647031. For example, I see $ dig +no{cmd,comments,stats} buy.ubuntu.com @8.8.8.8 ;buy.ubuntu.com.IN A buy.ubuntu.com. 599 IN CNAME ubuntu-advantage-cloud-guest.myshopify.com. ubuntu-advantage-cloud-guest.myshopify.com.

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1647105] Re: Merge vim 2:8.0.0095-1 from Debian testing/unstable

2016-12-04 Thread Anders Kaseorg
** Patch added: "Debdiff from vim 2:8.0.0095-1 in Debian testing/unstable" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/vim/+bug/1647105/+attachment/4787466/+files/vim_8.0.0095-1_1ubuntu1.debdiff ** Patch removed: "Debdiff from vim 2:8.0.0095-1 in Debian testing/unstable"

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1624039] Re: Vim 8.0 should be backported in

2016-12-04 Thread Anders Kaseorg
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 1647105 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1647105 ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 1647105 Merge vim 2:8.0.0095-1 from Debian testing/unstable -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1647105] [NEW] Merge vim 2:8.0.0095-1 from Debian testing/unstable

2016-12-03 Thread Anders Kaseorg
Public bug reported: Since Debian has now migrated vim from Python 2 to Python 3, this drops the Python 2 variants. Test build: https://launchpad.net/~andersk/+archive/ubuntu/ppa ** Affects: vim (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Tags: patch ** Patch added: "Debdiff

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1647031] [NEW] systemd-resolved’s 127.0.0.53 server does not follow CNAME records

2016-12-03 Thread Anders Kaseorg
Public bug reported: $ systemd-resolve www.freedesktop.org www.freedesktop.org: 131.252.210.176 2610:10:20:722:a800:ff:feda:470f (annarchy.freedesktop.org) -- Information acquired via protocol DNS in 673.6ms. -- Data is authenticated: no $ ping

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1577460] Re: mkinitramfs --help > Core dumped

2016-10-21 Thread Anders Kaseorg
Upstream applied an equivalent patch: http://git.kernel.org/cgit/utils/util-linux/util-linux.git/commit/?id=e1164591f7927402af8d73d340e75dbfeb06a288 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to util-linux in Ubuntu.

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1577460] Re: mkinitramfs --help > Core dumped

2016-10-19 Thread Anders Kaseorg
Upstream submission: http://marc.info/?l=util-linux- ng=147691687505965=2 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to util-linux in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1577460 Title: mkinitramfs --help > Core

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1577460] Re: mkinitramfs --help > Core dumped

2016-10-19 Thread Anders Kaseorg
This is a util-linux bug, not a glibc bug. I have sent this patch upstream. ** Also affects: util-linux (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Patch added: "0001-getopt-Terminate-long_options-even-if-add_long_optio.patch"

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1449001] Re: systemd-resolved: please do not use Google public DNS by default

2016-10-10 Thread Anders Kaseorg
The 8.8.8.8 fallback is not only used on misconfigured systems! It’s also used for a short period while initially connecting or reconnecting to totally healthy networks with DHCP. So the excuse that privacy- conscious users should just use DHCP holds no water.

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1624317] Re: systemd-resolved breaks VPN with split-horizon DNS

2016-09-29 Thread Anders Kaseorg
** Tags removed: regression-release -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to systemd in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1624317 Title: systemd-resolved breaks VPN with split-horizon DNS Status in systemd:

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1628778] Re: systemd-resolved: after network reconnection, DNSSEC unsigned zones treated as bogus, stop resolving

2016-09-29 Thread Anders Kaseorg
** Description changed: On the MIT network (which runs some ancient version of BIND 9), systemd- resolved stops resolving anything that isn’t DNSSEC-signed after I disconnect and reconnect the network. Signed zones continue to resolve. This happens with either DNSSEC=yes or the default

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1628778] [NEW] systemd-resolved: after network reconnection, DNSSEC unsigned zones treated as bogus, stop resolving

2016-09-29 Thread Anders Kaseorg
Public bug reported: On the MIT network (which runs some ancient version of BIND 9), systemd- resolved stops resolving anything that isn’t DNSSEC-signed after I disconnect and reconnect the network. Signed zones continue to resolve. This happens with either DNSSEC=yes or the default

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1624317] Re: systemd-resolved breaks VPN with split-horizon DNS

2016-09-29 Thread Anders Kaseorg
** Tags added: regression-release ** Tags added: yakkety -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to systemd in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1624317 Title: systemd-resolved breaks VPN with split-horizon DNS

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1624317] Re: systemd-resolved breaks VPN with split-horizon DNS

2016-09-29 Thread Anders Kaseorg
I want to be clear that in my situation the VPN’s DNS servers are _not_ marked as domain-restricted. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to systemd in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1624317 Title:

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1624317] Re: systemd-resolved breaks VPN with split-horizon DNS

2016-09-17 Thread Anders Kaseorg
(I believe the requested information has been provided.) ** Changed in: systemd (Ubuntu) Status: Incomplete => New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to systemd in Ubuntu.

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1624320] Re: systemd-resolved appends 127.0.0.53 to resolv.conf alongside existing entries

2016-09-16 Thread Anders Kaseorg
DNS resolution outside NSS shouldn’t be dismissed as an edge case for software that’s too conceited to use NSS. NSS only exposes A, , and PTR records. There’s plenty of software in the official archive that needs other records from DNS (off the top of my head: SRV, TXT, MX, SSHFP, AFSDB) and

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1624317] Re: systemd-resolved breaks VPN with split-horizon DNS

2016-09-16 Thread Anders Kaseorg
3421 seems like the opposite of this problem. There, queries that belong on the local network instead go to the domain-limited VPN servers. Here, queries that should go to the VPN servers (which in my case are not domain-limited) instead go to the local servers. Also, here I am using

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1624320] [NEW] systemd-resolved appends 127.0.0.53 to resolv.conf alongside existing entries

2016-09-16 Thread Anders Kaseorg
Public bug reported: systemd-resolved, or more precisely the hook script /lib/systemd/system /systemd-resolved.service.d/resolvconf.conf, causes resolvconf to add 127.0.0.53 to the set of nameservers in /etc/resolv.conf alongside the other nameservers. That makes no sense because

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1624317] [NEW] systemd-resolved breaks VPN with split-horizon DNS

2016-09-16 Thread Anders Kaseorg
Public bug reported: I use a VPN configured with network-manager-openconnect-gnome in which a split-horizon DNS setup assigns different addresses to some names inside the remote network than the addresses seen for those names from outside the remote network. However, systemd-resolved often

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1624071] Re: libnss-resolve: Fallback from resolve to dns breaks DNSSEC validation

2016-09-15 Thread Anders Kaseorg
Filed https://github.com/systemd/systemd/issues/4157 upstream for the NOTFOUND vs. UNAVAIL problem. ** Bug watch added: github.com/systemd/systemd/issues #4157 https://github.com/systemd/systemd/issues/4157 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1624071] Re: libnss-resolve: Fallback from resolve to dns breaks DNSSEC validation

2016-09-15 Thread Anders Kaseorg
** Description changed: The libnss-resolve postinst script inserts ‘resolve’ before ‘dns’ in the hosts line of /etc/nsswitch.conf. This makes DNSSEC validation impossible, even with DNSSEC=yes in /etc/systemd/resolved.conf, because if libnss_resolve returns a validation failure, glibc

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1624071] Re: libnss-resolve: Fallback from resolve to dns breaks DNSSEC validation

2016-09-15 Thread Anders Kaseorg
You’re right: glibc seems to treat the absence of libnss-resolve itself as UNAVAIL, which is the same code returned on DNSSEC validation failures when libnss-resolve is working. I don’t see a way around this other than patching libnss-resolve to return NOTFOUND (or TRYAGAIN?) on validation

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1624071] Re: libnss-resolve: Fallback from resolve to dns breaks DNSSEC validation

2016-09-15 Thread Anders Kaseorg
I also worry that, by masking systemd-resolved failures, this fallback has meant that systemd-resolved is not really getting adequate testing. If there were widespread problems causing systemd-resolved lookups to fail, would anyone have noticed? -- You received this bug notification because you

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1624071] [NEW] libnss-resolve: Fallback from resolve to dns breaks DNSSEC validation

2016-09-15 Thread Anders Kaseorg
Public bug reported: The libnss-resolve postinst script inserts ‘resolve’ before ‘dns’ in the hosts line of /etc/nsswitch.conf. This makes DNSSEC validation impossible, even with DNSSEC=yes in /etc/systemd/resolved.conf, because if libnss_resolve returns a validation failure, glibc will simply

[Touch-packages] [Bug 520546] Re: Alt-f2 switches to virtual terminal 2

2016-04-21 Thread Anders Kaseorg
I’m running Ubuntu Gnome 16.04. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to console-setup in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/520546 Title: Alt-f2 switches to virtual terminal 2 Status in console-cyrillic

[Touch-packages] [Bug 520546] Re: Alt-f2 switches to virtual terminal 2

2016-04-20 Thread Anders Kaseorg
When console-setup is configured, it runs ‘setupcon --force’, which breaks the running X server in exactly this way. ** Also affects: console-setup (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded

[Touch-packages] [Bug 520546] Re: Alt-f2 switches to virtual terminal 2

2016-04-20 Thread Anders Kaseorg
This might have something to with the default setting ACTIVE_CONSOLES="/dev/tty[1-6]" in /etc/default/console-setup conflicting with the recent move of X from console 7 to console 2. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1537635] Re: Reduce zlib compression level for massive performance increase

2016-01-25 Thread Anders Kaseorg
Level 5 isn’t crazy, though it’s still some 70% slower than level 1. zlib.compressobj(level=1) time=7.6 size=84869397 zlib.compressobj(level=2) time=7.8 size=82465461 zlib.compressobj(level=3) time=8.4 size=79576183 zlib.compressobj(level=4) time=12.2 size=74672475 zlib.compressobj(level=5)

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1537635] [NEW] Reduce zlib compression level for massive performance increase

2016-01-24 Thread Anders Kaseorg
Public bug reported: When apport takes a core dump of a large application, it uses 100% CPU for a _long_ time (often 30 seconds or more) to compress the core dump. The system is virtually unusable during this time, especially if the application was the window manager and won’t be restarted until

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1512209] Re: update-manager crashed with SyntaxError in find_cookie(): invalid or missing encoding declaration for '/usr/bin/sys'

2015-11-20 Thread Anders Kaseorg
** Bug watch added: Python Roundup #25493 http://bugs.python.org/issue25493 ** Also affects: python via http://bugs.python.org/issue25493 Importance: Unknown Status: Unknown ** Bug watch added: GNOME Bug Tracker #757184 https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=757184 **

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1512209] Re: update-manager crashed with SyntaxError in find_cookie(): invalid or missing encoding declaration for '/usr/bin/sys'

2015-11-20 Thread Anders Kaseorg
This is a combination of two problems. One is that starting update- manager results in these warnings: /usr/bin/update-manager:28: PyGIWarning: Gtk was imported without specifying a version first. Use gi.require_version('Gtk', '3.0') before import to ensure that the right version gets loaded.

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1489050] Re: Option -servername not described in manpage

2015-08-27 Thread Anders Kaseorg
I did not write the fix, but you should be checking the 1.0.2 manpages, not the 1.0.1 manpages. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to openssl in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1489050 Title: Option

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1489207] [NEW] /usr/share/doc/openssl/changelog.gz is a broken symlink

2015-08-26 Thread Anders Kaseorg
Public bug reported: $ zcat /usr/share/doc/openssl/changelog.gz gzip: /usr/share/doc/openssl/changelog.gz: No such file or directory $ ls -l /usr/share/doc/openssl/changelog.gz lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 27 Jul 9 10:06 /usr/share/doc/openssl/changelog.gz - ../libssl1.0.0/changelog.gz $ ls -l

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1489050] Re: Option -servername not described in manpage

2015-08-26 Thread Anders Kaseorg
Fixed in OpenSSL 1.0.2 in wily. ** Changed in: openssl (Ubuntu) Status: Confirmed = Fix Released -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to openssl in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1489050 Title:

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1483975] Re: update-initramfs complains about missing /sbin/fsck.btrfs

2015-08-16 Thread Anders Kaseorg
You might think that, but in fact the hook shipped with btrfs-tools only copies in /bin/fsck.btrfs if /usr/share/initramfs-tools/hooks/fsck is not executable. It is executable, so this has no effect. I have checked on current wily with / on btrfs that my initramfs really is missing fsck.btrfs (in

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1482439] Re: wpa_supplicant crashed with SIGSEGV in get_iface_by_dbus_path()

2015-08-15 Thread Anders Kaseorg
** Information type changed from Private to Public -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to wpa in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1482439 Title: wpa_supplicant crashed with SIGSEGV in

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1483975] [NEW] update-initramfs complains about missing /sbin/fsck.btrfs

2015-08-11 Thread Anders Kaseorg
Public bug reported: /sbin/fsck.btrfs moved to /bin/fsck.btrfs with btrfs-tools 4.0-2 (http://bugs.debian.org/784234), which causes $ sudo update-initramfs -u update-initramfs: Generating /boot/initrd.img-4.1.0-3-generic Warning: /sbin/fsck.btrfs doesn't exist, can't install to initramfs,

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1468832] Re: lightdm sources .profile

2015-06-25 Thread Anders Kaseorg
.xsession is sourced within /bin/sh, not /bin/bash. It wouldn’t make sense to source .bashrc from it (unless you happened to write a .bashrc that doesn’t use any bash features). Also, .bashrc is sourced by _every_ interactive shell, so if you were to add things to environment variables from

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1468832] Re: lightdm sources .profile

2015-06-25 Thread Anders Kaseorg
No, you misunderstand my comment. It doesn’t matter whether or not your shell is bash. ~/.xsession file is sourced using /bin/sh, not using your shell. You cannot expect to be able to source ~/.bashrc from ~/.xsession, no matter what your preferred shell is. -- You received this bug notification

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1468832] Re: lightdm sources .profile

2015-06-25 Thread Anders Kaseorg
Aha, I was confusing ~/.xsessionrc with ~/.xsession. ~/.xsessionrc is sourced using /bin/sh. A default Ubuntu session does not invoke ~/.xsession at all. Creating one that works correctly with Unity or GNOME or whatever, as well as configuring LightDM to invoke it it, requires a very pointy hat.

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1452099] [NEW] unshare -r is broken

2015-05-05 Thread Anders Kaseorg
Public bug reported: After CVE-2014-8989 was fixed in Linux v3.19-rc1~41, ‘unshare -r’ no longer works. $ unshare -Ur unshare: write failed /proc/self/gid_map: Operation not permitted $ sudo -i # unshare -r unshare: write failed /proc/self/gid_map: Operation not permitted This was fixed in

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1452099] Re: unshare -r is broken

2015-05-05 Thread Anders Kaseorg
** Patch added: Fix by merging util-linux 2.25.2-6 from Debian https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/util-linux/+bug/1452099/+attachment/4391896/+files/util-linux_2.25.2-4ubuntu2_lp1452099.debdiff ** Tags added: patch patch-accepted-debian -- You received this bug notification because

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1426588] Re: systemctl assert failure: *** Error in `systemctl': double free or corruption (fasttop): 0x00007fa04bf00910 ***

2015-04-23 Thread Anders Kaseorg
Sure, here it is. ** Attachment added: vmware-USBArbitrator https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/systemd/+bug/1426588/+attachment/4381963/+files/vmware-USBArbitrator -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to

[Touch-packages] [Bug 807303] Re: bizarre error - file size is not what the server reported with private ppa

2015-03-30 Thread Anders Kaseorg
I can reproduce this message by adding many https repositories to sources.list. For example, with these sources (which are public, so you can try this yourself): deb https://debathena.mit.edu/apt precise debathena deb-src https://debathena.mit.edu/apt precise debathena deb

[Touch-packages] [Bug 807303] Re: bizarre error - file size is not what the server reported with private ppa

2015-03-30 Thread Anders Kaseorg
I submitted a patch to https://bugs.debian.org/781509. ** Bug watch added: Debian Bug tracker #781509 http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=781509 ** Also affects: apt (Debian) via http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=781509 Importance: Unknown Status:

  1   2   >