[Touch-packages] [Bug 1998267] Re: glib not aware of snap confinement

2023-04-27 Thread Robert Ancell
Correct, this fix is valuable for core22, so kinetic was skipped. There should be no issues for anyone updating from jammy to kinetic. Though this will affect core20, we expect most snaps to be using core22 so no plan to backport it to focal. -- You received this bug notification because you are

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1998267] Re: glib not aware of snap confinement

2023-04-27 Thread Robert Ancell
Yes, these specific steps performed in a core desktop VM. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to glib2.0 in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1998267 Title: glib not aware of snap confinement Status in

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1998267] Re: glib not aware of snap confinement

2023-04-19 Thread Robert Ancell
I tested a standard jammy desktop in a VM by running various apps including calculator to confirm they were still working (i.e. looking for regressions). I tested the core desktop behaviour by building the core22-desktop snap from https://github.com/canonical/core-base-desktop/ (locally modified

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1998267] Re: glib not aware of snap confinement

2023-04-17 Thread Robert Ancell
I've looked at the autopkgtests and the failures don't seem to be related to this change. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to glib2.0 in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1998267 Title: glib not aware of

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1998267] Re: glib not aware of snap confinement

2023-04-17 Thread Robert Ancell
Tested glib2.0 2.72.4-0ubuntu2 in a jammy VM and working. ** Tags removed: verification-needed verification-needed-jammy ** Tags added: verification-done-jammy -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to glib2.0 in

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1998267] Re: glib not aware of snap confinement

2023-03-22 Thread Robert Ancell
** Changed in: glib2.0 (Ubuntu Kinetic) Status: New => Won't Fix -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to glib2.0 in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1998267 Title: glib not aware of snap confinement

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1998267] Re: glib not aware of snap confinement

2023-03-22 Thread Robert Ancell
** Description changed: [ Impact] glib is not aware of snap confinement and this causes the internal logic to decide when to use portals to not work as designed. One important case is the gsettings backend, which should use a keyfile when confined rather than using dconf. When using

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1998267] [NEW] glib not aware of snap confinement

2022-11-29 Thread Robert Ancell
problems could occur ] - New bug introduced in glib causing a crash. - Security issue introduced in glib due to accessing snapctl. - Unexpected behaviour change when running snaps with updated glib. ** Affects: glib2.0 (Ubuntu) Importance: High Assignee: Robert Ancell (robert-ancell

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1998267] Re: glib not aware of snap confinement

2022-11-29 Thread Robert Ancell
rtance: Undecided => High ** Changed in: glib2.0 (Ubuntu Jammy) Assignee: (unassigned) => Robert Ancell (robert-ancell) ** Changed in: glib2.0 (Ubuntu Kinetic) Assignee: (unassigned) => Robert Ancell (robert-ancell) ** Changed in: glib2.0 (Ubuntu Lunar) Assignee: (unassi

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1842439] Re: apport-gtk crashed with SIGSEGV in _gtk_settings_get_screen(settings=0x0) from gtk_css_value_icon_theme_compute() from gtk_css_static_style_compute_value()

2022-11-04 Thread Robert Ancell
Investigated this, it is due to the theming code failing to get a settings object, probably due to the shell not running at the time. The GTK functions that return the settings object are allowed to return NULL, and this case was not being handled in GTK. The attached patch contains three fixes in

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1990448] Re: Show Ubuntu Pro settings

2022-09-26 Thread Robert Ancell
This bug is a bit of a placeholder at the moment - we'll get this landed into kinetic first and then update this to SRU the change back to the older releases. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1990448] Re: Show Ubuntu Pro settings

2022-09-21 Thread Robert Ancell
** Also affects: software-properties (Ubuntu Xenial) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to software-properties in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1990448 Title:

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1990448] [NEW] Show Ubuntu Pro settings

2022-09-21 Thread Robert Ancell
Public bug reported: Expose more of the Ubuntu Pro (aka Ubuntu Advantage) services instead of just Livepatch. ** Affects: software-properties (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Affects: software-properties (Ubuntu Bionic) Importance: Undecided Status: New

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1981042] Re: /etc/localtime symlink not correctly handled when using /etc/writable

2022-09-13 Thread Robert Ancell
Installed systemd 249.11-0ubuntu3.6 on a jammy VM and confirmed everything working as expected, thanks! ** Tags removed: verification-needed-jammy ** Tags added: verification-done-jammy -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1981042] Re: /etc/localtime symlink not correctly handled when using /etc/writable

2022-08-02 Thread Robert Ancell
** Description changed: - When using /etc/writable (e.g. Ubuntu Core) /etc/localtime is a symlink - to /etc/writable/localtime (which in itself if a symlink). Systemd - doesn't handle this correctly when doing firstboot or using inotify to - watch for changed to localtime. + [Impact] + When using

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1981042] [NEW] /etc/localtime symlink not correctly handled when using /etc/writable

2022-07-07 Thread Robert Ancell
Public bug reported: When using /etc/writable (e.g. Ubuntu Core) /etc/localtime is a symlink to /etc/writable/localtime (which in itself if a symlink). Systemd doesn't handle this correctly when doing firstboot or using inotify to watch for changed to localtime. ** Affects: systemd (Ubuntu)

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1978042] Re: adduser doesn't support extrausers for group management

2022-06-09 Thread Robert Ancell
Ugh, turns out I don't need to SRU these back to focal - we will be using Ubuntu Core 22 which already includes these changes. Sorry for the noise. ** Changed in: shadow (Ubuntu Focal) Status: In Progress => Won't Fix ** Changed in: adduser (Ubuntu Focal) Status: In Progress =>

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1978042] Re: adduser doesn't support extrausers for group management

2022-06-08 Thread Robert Ancell
** Description changed: [Impact] When using adduser --extrausers on Ubuntu Core the command attempts to use the /etc/group file instead of /var/lib/extrausers/group. e.g. the following commands will fail: $ adduser --extrausers user group $ adduser --extrausers --ingroup group

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1978042] Re: adduser doesn't support extrausers for group management

2022-06-08 Thread Robert Ancell
I realized after generating the debdiffs that I didn't have the bug number in the changelog - this is fixed in the version uploaded to focal. ** Changed in: adduser (Ubuntu Focal) Status: New => In Progress ** Changed in: shadow (Ubuntu Focal) Status: New => In Progress **

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1978042] Re: adduser doesn't support extrausers for group management

2022-06-08 Thread Robert Ancell
** Patch added: "adduser.debdiff" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/focal/+source/adduser/+bug/1978042/+attachment/5595790/+files/adduser.debdiff -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to adduser in Ubuntu.

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1978042] Re: adduser doesn't support extrausers for group management

2022-06-08 Thread Robert Ancell
** Patch added: "shadow.debdiff" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/focal/+source/adduser/+bug/1978042/+attachment/5595787/+files/shadow.debdiff -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to adduser in Ubuntu.

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1978042] Re: adduser doesn't support extrausers for group management

2022-06-08 Thread Robert Ancell
LP: #195375 adds extrausers groups support to the usermod command, this SRU adds support to gpasswd (which is used by useradd). -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to adduser in Ubuntu.

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1978042] [NEW] adduser doesn't support extrausers for group management

2022-06-08 Thread Robert Ancell
Public bug reported: [Impact] When using adduser --extrausers on Ubuntu Core the command attempts to use the /etc/group file instead of /var/lib/extrausers/group. e.g. the following commands will fail: $ adduser --extrausers user group $ adduser --extrausers --ingroup group user [Test Plan]

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1965993] Re: Remove Ubuntu Pro settings

2022-03-22 Thread Robert Ancell
Note to self to update the PPA with this change re-enabled once this lands. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to software-properties in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1965993 Title: Remove Ubuntu Pro

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1965993] Re: Remove Ubuntu Pro settings

2022-03-22 Thread Robert Ancell
Change ready for release in the software-properties git: https://git.launchpad.net/software-properties/commit/?id=f2f4a566ee2cf45c35a1d1ed0849fde16553cc28 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to software-properties in

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1965993] Re: Remove Ubuntu Pro settings

2022-03-22 Thread Robert Ancell
ntu) Assignee: (unassigned) => Robert Ancell (robert-ancell) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to software-properties in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1965993 Title: Remove Ubuntu Pro settings

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1965993] Re: Remove Ubuntu Pro settings

2022-03-22 Thread Robert Ancell
** Attachment added: "Current Ubuntu Pro page in jammy" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/software-properties/+bug/1965993/+attachment/5572008/+files/Screenshot%20from%202022-03-23%2012-04-48.png -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1965993] Re: Remove Ubuntu Pro settings

2022-03-22 Thread Robert Ancell
** Attachment added: "Page with Ubuntu Pro settings removed." https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/software-properties/+bug/1965993/+attachment/5572009/+files/Screenshot%20from%202022-03-23%2012-05-11.png ** Description changed: Due to backend delay, we want to remove the Ubuntu Pro

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1965993] [NEW] Remove Ubuntu Pro settings

2022-03-22 Thread Robert Ancell
ranslated when this change is reverted. See below for screenshots of the change. ** Affects: software-properties (Ubuntu) Importance: High Assignee: Robert Ancell (robert-ancell) Status: New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded pa

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1965138] Re: Desktop application should check for service available information before listing it

2022-03-16 Thread Robert Ancell
The following PR should hopefully fix this: https://github.com/canonical/ubuntu-advantage-desktop-daemon/pull/14 ** Changed in: software-properties (Ubuntu) Assignee: (unassigned) => Robert Ancell (robert-ancell) ** Changed in: software-properties (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided =>

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1959667] Re: non informative error message when enabling a non available UA service

2022-02-01 Thread Robert Ancell
(Ubuntu) Status: New => Triaged ** Changed in: software-properties (Ubuntu) Assignee: (unassigned) => Robert Ancell (robert-ancell) ** Changed in: software-properties (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided => Medium -- You received this bug notification because you are a member

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1958311] Re: Show all Ubuntu Advantage services

2022-01-18 Thread Robert Ancell
Currently available for testing in https://launchpad.net/~robert- ancell/+archive/ubuntu/ubuntu-pro -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to software-properties in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1958311 Title

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1958311] Re: Show all Ubuntu Advantage services

2022-01-18 Thread Robert Ancell
Blocked on ubuntu-advantage-desktop-daemon MIR (LP: #1954909) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to software-properties in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1958311 Title: Show all Ubuntu Advantage services

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1958311] Re: Show all Ubuntu Advantage services

2022-01-18 Thread Robert Ancell
** Changed in: software-properties (Ubuntu Bionic) Assignee: (unassigned) => Robert Ancell (robert-ancell) ** Changed in: software-properties (Ubuntu Focal) Assignee: (unassigned) => Robert Ancell (robert-ancell) ** Changed in: software-properties (Ubuntu Jammy) As

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1958311] [NEW] Show all Ubuntu Advantage services

2022-01-18 Thread Robert Ancell
Public bug reported: Replace the Livepatch page with an "Ubuntu Pro" page that shows full status and control of Ubuntu Advantage services. This gives graphical control of features that the 'ua' command line tool provides. [Test Plan] 1. Open software-properties 2. Go to Ubuntu Pro page. 3. Check

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1931582] Re: Add LOGO to /etc/os-release

2021-11-30 Thread Robert Ancell
The format seems clear, from the os-release spec: "...the name of an icon as defined by freedesktop.org Icon Theme Specification" -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to base-files in Ubuntu.

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1934439] Re: Add Ubuntu Pro banner to Livepatch page

2021-11-14 Thread Robert Ancell
Tested software-properties-gtk 0.96.24.32.18 on bionic. Confirmed banner shows with correct link and can be dismissed. ** Tags removed: verification-needed verification-needed-bionic ** Tags added: verification-done-bionic -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1920836] Re: Show Extended Security Maintenence status

2021-11-04 Thread Robert Ancell
This has been uploaded as 0.96.24.32.18. SRU team please reject 0.96.24.32.17 in proposed as no need for that SRU to delay this one. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to software-properties in Ubuntu.

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1934439] Re: Add Ubuntu Pro banner to Livepatch page

2021-11-04 Thread Robert Ancell
Tested software-properties-gtk 0.99.9.8 on focal. Confirmed banner shows with correct link and can be dismissed. ** Tags removed: verification-needed verification-needed-focal ** Tags added: verification-done-focal -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1934439] Re: Add Ubuntu Pro banner to Livepatch page

2021-11-04 Thread Robert Ancell
Tested software-properties-gtk 0.96.24.32.17 on bionic. Confirmed banner shows with correct link and can be dismissed. ** Tags removed: verification-needed-bionic ** Tags added: verification-done-bionic -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1920836] Re: Show Extended Security Maintenence status

2021-10-27 Thread Robert Ancell
@chad.smith - agreed, these changes as currently proposed will need to be updated. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to software-properties in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1920836 Title: Show Extended

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1934199] Re: Switch from Livepatch service to UA client

2021-09-28 Thread Robert Ancell
I had a WIP branch done as part of the ESM work. That's now been rescheduled to April 2022, and the Livepatch migration will be done as part of that. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to software-properties in

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1920836] Re: Show Extended Security Maintenence status

2021-08-25 Thread Robert Ancell
@chad.smith - can you make merge requests for the required changes to the ubuntu/hirsute, ubuntu/focal etc branches (https://git.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/software-properties)? I can then review those and do the uploads as required. If you need any UI changes I can make those, but I think at

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1920836] Re: Show Extended Security Maintenence status

2021-07-14 Thread Robert Ancell
-properties is going to not offer ESM as it's not going to think it's available. In https://code.launchpad.net/~robert-ancell/software- properties/+git/software-properties/+merge/400153 that 'ua status' can timeout and return empty values, which is why we are accessing /var/lib/ubuntu-advantage/status.json

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1934439] Re: Add Ubuntu Pro banner to Livepatch page

2021-07-14 Thread Robert Ancell
A couple of points about putting it into Impish: - What mechanism can we use to determine if it should show? - Since the banner refers to a beta feature, it will be replaced at some point with a new banner, is it worth bringing that into Impish or waiting for the more complete feature. -- You

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1934439] Re: Add Ubuntu Pro banner to Livepatch page

2021-07-07 Thread Robert Ancell
** Description changed: - Add a banner to the Livepatch page to invite users to join the Ubuntu - Pro for Desktop. + [Impact] + Add a banner to the Livepatch page to invite users to join the Ubuntu Pro for Desktop. Note that this is not shown in current releases, as this feature only applies to

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1934439] Re: Add Ubuntu Pro banner to Livepatch page

2021-07-07 Thread Robert Ancell
Lech - the Xenial version doesn't have a Livepatch page, should it be placed somewhere else? ** Changed in: software-properties (Ubuntu Bionic) Assignee: (unassigned) => Robert Ancell (robert-ancell) ** Changed in: software-properties (Ubuntu Focal) Assignee: (unassigned) =>

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1934439] Re: Add Ubuntu Pro banner to Livepatch page

2021-07-07 Thread Robert Ancell
** No longer affects: software-properties (Ubuntu Hirsute) ** No longer affects: software-properties (Ubuntu Impish) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to software-properties in Ubuntu.

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1934439] Re: Add Ubuntu Pro banner to Livepatch page

2021-07-04 Thread Robert Ancell
Thanks for the feedback. Which distribution(s) should this be targetting? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to software-properties in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1934439 Title: Add Ubuntu Pro banner

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1934439] Re: Add Ubuntu Pro banner to Livepatch page

2021-07-01 Thread Robert Ancell
Information required for implementation: - Where does the link go to, http://ubuntu.com/desktop/pro? - Does the banner only show if you haven't already attached this machine to Ubuntu Advantage? - When closing the banner, does it return next time? - Does it make sense for this to be in the

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1934439] Re: Add Ubuntu Pro banner to Livepatch page

2021-07-01 Thread Robert Ancell
Implementation at https://code.launchpad.net/~robert-ancell/software- properties/+git/software-properties/+ref/ubuntu-pro-beta -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to software-properties in Ubuntu. https

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1934439] Re: Add Ubuntu Pro banner to Livepatch page

2021-07-01 Thread Robert Ancell
** Attachment added: "Screenshot of implementation" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/software-properties/+bug/1934439/+attachment/5508533/+files/Screenshot%20from%202021-07-02%2016-58-30.png ** Also affects: software-properties (Ubuntu Bionic) Importance: Undecided Status:

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1934439] [NEW] Add Ubuntu Pro banner to Livepatch page

2021-07-01 Thread Robert Ancell
Public bug reported: Add a banner to the Livepatch page to invite users to join the Ubuntu Pro for Desktop. ** Affects: software-properties (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Affects: software-properties (Ubuntu Xenial) Importance: Undecided Status: New

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1934439] Re: Add Ubuntu Pro banner to Livepatch page

2021-07-01 Thread Robert Ancell
** Attachment added: "Mockup of banner" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/software-properties/+bug/1934439/+attachment/5508532/+files/ubuntu-pro-mockup.png -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1934199] Re: Switch from Livepatch service to UA client

2021-06-30 Thread Robert Ancell
The current implementation shows "Last check for updates". As far as I can tell this information is not available via the UA client. It also shows a list of applied CVE fixes, which again I don't think is available from the UA client. See attached screenshot of current implementation in 18.04

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1934199] [NEW] Switch from Livepatch service to UA client

2021-06-30 Thread Robert Ancell
Public bug reported: software-properties currently uses a HTTP over Unix domain socket service from the livepatch snap to get the status and enable/disable it. This service is being deprecated with the 'ua' command line tool now providing this functionality. software-properties also installed the

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1920836] Re: Show Extended Security Maintenence status

2021-06-20 Thread Robert Ancell
The warnings about the status.json file are due to the ubuntu-advantage client on these older systems not yet having the feature to write this file. When updated, this should work - that's correct, right @chad.smith? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1920836] Re: Show Extended Security Maintenence status

2021-03-28 Thread Robert Ancell
Bionic and focal branches/PPA also updated. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to software-properties in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1920836 Title: Show Extended Security Maintenence status Status in

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1920836] Re: Show Extended Security Maintenence status

2021-03-28 Thread Robert Ancell
I've updated the xenial branch and version in the PPA with the fixes requested, thanks! -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to software-properties in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1920836 Title: Show

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1920836] Re: Show Extended Security Maintenence status

2021-03-28 Thread Robert Ancell
This change is based on the expectation that UA tools will be the version that is about to be SRUd. The old version gracefully fails with `ua status --format=json`, so should already effectively return (False, False). I didn't do an explicit check on the version as it's non-trivial to do and I'd

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1920836] Re: Show Extended Security Maintenence status

2021-03-24 Thread Robert Ancell
Merge request for master: https://code.launchpad.net/~robert-ancell/software-properties/+git/software-properties/+merge/400153 Other branches for SRUing: https://code.launchpad.net/~robert-ancell/software-properties/+git/software-properties/+ref/esm-focal https://code.launchpad.net/~robert-ancell

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1920836] Re: Show Extended Security Maintenence status

2021-03-22 Thread Robert Ancell
Code is in: https://code.launchpad.net/~robert-ancell/software-properties/+git/software-properties/+ref/esm https://code.launchpad.net/~robert-ancell/software-properties/+git/software-properties/+ref/esm-xenial -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1920836] Re: Show Extended Security Maintenence status

2021-03-22 Thread Robert Ancell
I've made a PPA to test this: https://launchpad.net/~robert- ancell/+archive/ubuntu/software-properties -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to software-properties in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1920836

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1920836] Re: Show Extended Security Maintenence status

2021-03-22 Thread Robert Ancell
** Also affects: software-properties (Ubuntu Hirsute) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Also affects: software-properties (Ubuntu Focal) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Also affects: software-properties (Ubuntu Bionic) Importance: Undecided Status: New **

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1920836] Re: Show Extended Security Maintenence status

2021-03-22 Thread Robert Ancell
** Description changed: [Impact] There is not currently a graphical method of determining if a system is subscribed to [Extended Security Maintenance](https://ubuntu.com/security/esm) updates. This is resolved by adding some [new

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1920836] Re: Show Extended Security Maintenence status

2021-03-22 Thread Robert Ancell
** Attachment added: "New UI in xenial with ESM applied." https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/software-properties/+bug/1920836/+attachment/5479359/+files/Screenshot%20from%202021-03-23%2012-31-56.png ** Description changed: [Impact] - There is not currently a graphical method of

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1920836] Re: Show Extended Security Maintenence status

2021-03-22 Thread Robert Ancell
** Attachment added: "New UI in xenial with ESM available" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/software-properties/+bug/1920836/+attachment/5479358/+files/Screenshot%20from%202021-03-23%2012-32-22.png -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1920836] [NEW] Show Extended Security Maintenence status

2021-03-22 Thread Robert Ancell
Public bug reported: [Impact] There is not currently a graphical method of determining if a system is subscribed to [Extended Security Maintenance](https://ubuntu.com/security/esm) updates. This is resolved by adding some [new

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1920836] Re: Show Extended Security Maintenence status

2021-03-22 Thread Robert Ancell
** Attachment added: "Current UI in xenial" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/software-properties/+bug/1920836/+attachment/5479357/+files/Screenshot%20from%202021-03-23%2012-32-37.png -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages,

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1892455] Re: [MIR] libselinux1

2020-09-24 Thread Robert Ancell
Oops, I thought it was in universe. This is not required then. ** Changed in: libselinux (Ubuntu) Status: Incomplete => Invalid -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to libselinux in Ubuntu.

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1892455] Re: [MIR] libselinux1

2020-08-20 Thread Robert Ancell
** Description changed: Many applications have Flatpak integration using libflatpak. The Ubuntu desktop team would like libflatpak in main so we can easily build such applications (LP: #1812456). libselinux is a dependency of this, so it would also need to be in main. We don't need

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1892455] [NEW] [MIR] libselinux1

2020-08-20 Thread Robert Ancell
Public bug reported: Many applications have Flatpak integration using libflatpak. The Ubuntu desktop team would like libflatpak in main so we can easily build such applications (LP: #1812456). libselinux is a dependency of this, so it would also need to be in main. We don't need SELinux

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1871023] Re: json_gvariant_deserialize can fail due to unrelated code setting errno

2020-04-07 Thread Robert Ancell
Confirmed fixed in Bionic with json-glib 1.4.2-3ubuntu0.18.04.1 ** Tags removed: verification-needed verification-needed-bionic ** Tags added: verification-done-bionic -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1871023] Re: json_gvariant_deserialize can fail due to unrelated code setting errno

2020-04-07 Thread Robert Ancell
Confirmed fixed in Eoan with json-glib 1.4.4-2ubuntu0.19.10.1 ** Tags removed: verification-needed-eoan ** Tags added: verification-done-eoan -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to json-glib in Ubuntu.

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1871023] Re: json_gvariant_deserialize can fail due to unrelated code setting errno

2020-04-06 Thread Robert Ancell
** Changed in: json-glib (Ubuntu Bionic) Status: Fix Committed => In Progress ** Changed in: json-glib (Ubuntu Eoan) Status: Fix Committed => In Progress -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1871023] Re: json_gvariant_deserialize can fail due to unrelated code setting errno

2020-04-06 Thread Robert Ancell
** Changed in: json-glib (Ubuntu Eoan) Status: New => Fix Committed ** Changed in: json-glib (Ubuntu Bionic) Status: New => Fix Committed -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to json-glib in Ubuntu.

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1871023] Re: json_gvariant_deserialize can fail due to unrelated code setting errno

2020-04-06 Thread Robert Ancell
** Description changed: [Impact] json_gvariant_deserialize can fail due to unrelated code setting errno, this is causing snapd-glib to not be able to decode responses from snapd. Fixed in https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/json-glib/-/merge_requests/22 [Test Case] 1. Run GNOME Software

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1871023] Re: json_gvariant_deserialize can fail due to unrelated code setting errno

2020-04-06 Thread Robert Ancell
** Changed in: json-glib (Ubuntu Focal) Status: New => Fix Committed ** Changed in: json-glib (Ubuntu Focal) Importance: Undecided => High ** Changed in: json-glib (Ubuntu Eoan) Importance: Undecided => High ** Changed in: json-glib (Ubuntu Bionic) Importance: Undecided => High

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1871023] Re: json_gvariant_deserialize can fail due to unrelated code setting errno

2020-04-06 Thread Robert Ancell
** Changed in: json-glib (Ubuntu Bionic) Assignee: (unassigned) => Robert Ancell (robert-ancell) ** Changed in: json-glib (Ubuntu Eoan) Assignee: (unassigned) => Robert Ancell (robert-ancell) ** Changed in: json-glib (Ubuntu Focal) Assignee: (unassigned) => Robert Ancel

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1871023] [NEW] json_gvariant_deserialize can fail due to unrelated code setting errno

2020-04-05 Thread Robert Ancell
Public bug reported: [Impact] json_gvariant_deserialize can fail due to unrelated code setting errno, this is causing snapd-glib to not be able to decode responses from snapd. Fixed in https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/json-glib/-/merge_requests/22 [Test Case] 1. Run GNOME Software from the

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1086783] Re: New PolicyKit 0.106 changes configuration file format

2020-01-07 Thread Robert Ancell
I've made a forum post asking for feedback from users of polkit in Ubuntu (https://discourse.ubuntu.com/t/use-of-javascript-rules-in- polkit/13892). If you have comments please add them there instead of this bug. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1086783] Re: New PolicyKit 0.106 changes configuration file format

2020-01-07 Thread Robert Ancell
An update on the current state of this: - polkit upstream currently depends on mozjs60 - mozjs60 is in main, but only for the use of GNOME Shell. - The current polkit Debian/Ubuntu package has 61 patches in it, backporting lots of changes from version 106 to 116. - There are upstream requests for

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1742997] Re: Newly installed applications are not showing in "Installed"

2019-09-18 Thread Robert Ancell
Confirmed in bionic that gnome-software 3.28.1-0ubuntu4.18.04.12 after removing and re-installing moon-buggy it shows in the installed page. ** Tags removed: verification-needed verification-needed-bionic ** Tags added: verification-done-bionic -- You received this bug notification because you

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1843730] Re: dee ftbfs in eoan (all architectures)

2019-09-17 Thread Robert Ancell
The patch from ricotz makes sense to me. The particular properties are construct only and unlikely to be used by a Vala app. So disabling them works fine. ** Changed in: dee (Ubuntu Eoan) Status: Confirmed => Fix Committed -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1742997] Re: Newly installed applications are not showing in "Installed"

2019-09-17 Thread Robert Ancell
** Changed in: gnome-software (Ubuntu Bionic) Status: Triaged => Fix Committed -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to packagekit in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1742997 Title: Newly installed

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1742997] Re: Newly installed applications are not showing in "Installed"

2019-09-17 Thread Robert Ancell
** Changed in: gnome-software (Ubuntu Bionic) Status: Confirmed => Triaged ** Description changed: - If you install any application using GNOME Software (Ubuntu Software), - the newly installed application is not displayed on the "Installed" tab. - It starts showing after the next system

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1842651] Re: Regression: after Uprade from udev_237-3ubuntu10.25 to udev_237-3ubuntu10.26 network interfaces don't get renamed by 70-persistent-network.rules

2019-09-05 Thread Robert Ancell
@chrisccoulson - I sponsored the changes as per normal, so they're in the queue for -proposed in bionic and disco. Can I upload to the security pocket? Does that just require debian/changelog to be changed? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1841382] Re: Various programs crashed with SIGSEGV in g_str_hash() from g_hash_table_lookup_node() / g_hash_table_lookup() from accountsservice 0.6.55-0ubuntu5/6

2019-09-05 Thread Robert Ancell
The main issue is when I updated to 0.6.55 the new Meson based build systemd didn't build with systemd support by default. So I've uploaded a build with this enabled. There may still be an underlying issue, but this should fix the eoan issues. ** Changed in: accountsservice (Ubuntu)

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1841382] Re: Various programs crashed with SIGSEGV in g_str_hash() from g_hash_table_lookup_node() / g_hash_table_lookup() from accountsservice 0.6.55-0ubuntu5/6

2019-09-04 Thread Robert Ancell
Upstream bug report opened: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/accountsservice/accountsservice/issues/80 ** Bug watch added: gitlab.freedesktop.org/accountsservice/accountsservice/issues #80 https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/accountsservice/accountsservice/issues/80 -- You received this bug

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1841382] Re: Various programs crashed with SIGSEGV in g_str_hash() from g_hash_table_lookup_node() / g_hash_table_lookup() from accountsservice 0.6.55-0ubuntu5/6

2019-09-04 Thread Robert Ancell
If the above theory is correct then this commit caused the bug: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/accountsservice/accountsservice/commit/9b4108755a6e1f5f04d80fef92dd3f81423857ad This commit came when we migrated from 0.6.45 to 0.6.50, which explains why this is being seen in disco and eoan. -- You

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1841382] Re: Various programs crashed with SIGSEGV in g_str_hash() from g_hash_table_lookup_node() / g_hash_table_lookup() from accountsservice 0.6.55-0ubuntu5/6

2019-09-04 Thread Robert Ancell
It looks like it's crashing in this code: username = act_user_get_user_name (user); if (g_hash_table_lookup (priv->system_users_by_name, username) != NULL) { and username is probably NULL. A possible cause of this is the user object for some reason might not have a DBus proxy

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1841382] Re: Various programs crashed with SIGSEGV in g_str_hash() from g_hash_table_lookup_node() / g_hash_table_lookup() from accountsservice 0.6.55-0ubuntu5/6

2019-09-03 Thread Robert Ancell
** Changed in: accountsservice (Ubuntu) Assignee: (unassigned) => Robert Ancell (robert-ancell) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to accountsservice in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1841382 Ti

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1841079] Re: Speech Dispatcher and other non-human users should not be shown on LightdDM login screen and session menus

2019-09-03 Thread Robert Ancell
Can you please test accountsservice 0.6.55-0ubuntu7 and confirm if this fixes these users? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to accountsservice in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1841079 Title: Speech

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1837700] Re: Dell system takes a long time to connect network with external dock

2019-08-21 Thread Robert Ancell
** Changed in: systemd (Ubuntu) Assignee: (unassigned) => Shih-Yuan Lee (fourdollars) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to systemd in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1837700 Title: Dell system takes

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1742997] Re: Newly installed applications are not showing in "Installed"

2019-07-29 Thread Robert Ancell
Note that this bug occurs on all versions of GNOME Software. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to packagekit in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1742997 Title: Newly installed applications are not showing

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1742997] Re: Newly installed applications are not showing in "Installed"

2019-07-29 Thread Robert Ancell
https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-software/merge_requests/291 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to packagekit in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1742997 Title: Newly installed applications are not

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1742997] Re: Newly installed applications are not showing in "Installed"

2019-07-29 Thread Robert Ancell
I've managed to find a bug that stops apps appearing in the installed list when they are *reinstalled*. To reproduce: 1. Open GNOME Software 2. Go to installed tab 3. Click on an installed app 4. Remove this app 5. Install this app 6. Click back button to return to installation page. The app

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1742997] Re: Newly installed applications are not showing in "Installed"

2019-04-08 Thread Robert Ancell
I was reproducing this, but when I added instrumentation it started working. It does reproduce in a VM, so will keep investigating. The code that adds the installed apps to the installation page seems fairly robust, so not sure what might be breaking it. -- You received this bug notification

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1817338] Re: HDMI sound output not selectable in 19.04 (but works in 18.10)

2019-03-10 Thread Robert Ancell
** Changed in: gnome-control-center (Ubuntu) Assignee: (unassigned) => Robert Ancell (robert-ancell) ** Changed in: gnome-control-center (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided => High -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages,

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1816237] Re: There is no lightdm in ubuntu

2019-02-18 Thread Robert Ancell
I'm not sure what you mean by this - you can't install the package or the package is missing some configuration files? ** Changed in: lightdm (Ubuntu) Status: New => Incomplete -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is

  1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   >