pgrade, nor why you
get a configuration error on upgrade in the absence of this file.
> I'll try to do a 22.04 -> 22.10 upgrade on my local machine later
today.
Thanks. At the moment this is unreproducible and there is no further action
for us to take.
--
Steve Langasek Gi
On Tue, Oct 25, 2022 at 01:55:53AM -, Chris M. wrote:
> [Unit]
> After=ssh.socket
> Requires=ssh.socket
>
> ** Attachment added: "00-socket.conf"
This appears to be the contents of
/etc/systemd/system/ssh.service.d/00-socket.conf. I am looking for the
contents of the /etc/systemd/system/ssh.
The error in your (Machine-1) log is:
> Setting up openssh-server (1:9.0p1-1ubuntu7) ...
> Replacing config file /etc/ssh/sshd_config with new version
> Synchronizing state of ssh.service with SysV service script with
> /lib/systemd/systemd-sysv-install.
> Executing: /lib/systemd/systemd-sysv-ins
On Fri, Oct 21, 2022 at 02:06:33PM -, Christophe M. wrote:
> Hellow, same issue here. SSHD failed during the do-release-upgrade
> process on one of my machines, and now it refuses to change the port to
> anything else than 22 on both of my machines. If I start the sshd daemon
> using systemd se
** Changed in: libreoffice (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided => Medium
** Changed in: fontconfig (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided => Medium
** Changed in: fontconfig (Ubuntu)
Status: Confirmed => Incomplete
** Changed in: libreoffice (Ubuntu)
Status: Confirmed => Incomplete
--
Y
** Changed in: openssh (Ubuntu)
Status: Incomplete => Triaged
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to openssh in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1993478
Title:
package openssh-server 1:9.0p1-1ubuntu7
Based on what you quote of the contents of your sshd_config, my
expectation would be that we NOT migrate to socket activation on
upgrade.
** Changed in: openssh (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided => Critical
** Tags added: foundations-todo
--
You received this bug notification because you are a
> sshdconfig.txt actually does NOT contain a line with Port 22 (it is
commented out)
Why do you mention this? I don't see anything in the log file that
mentions Port settings.
Your dpkg log shows:
> Failed to restart ssh.socket: Unit ssh.socket has a bad unit file setting.
> See system logs and
** Summary changed:
- ZFS + Encryption installations of Ubuntu Desktop suffer various severe
problems related to the package manager
+ ZFS + Encryption installations of Ubuntu Desktop do not come up correctly on
first boot, systemd unmounts many of the zfs volumes
--
You received this bug noti
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 1980494 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1980494
thanks for the update. That makes this a duplicate of bug #1980494.
** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 1980494
krb5-multidev is not multi-arch installable due to differences in
/usr/bin/krb
Also this appears to be hand-transcribed from the actual error message
(there is no such thing as a "paste subprocess"). Please copy and paste
error messages to avoid introducing such mistakes.
What is normally useful here is to attach /var/log/apt/term.log from the
affected system.
--
You rece
** Changed in: fetchmail (Ubuntu)
Status: Confirmed => Invalid
** Changed in: freedombox-setup (Ubuntu)
Status: Confirmed => Invalid
** Changed in: open-iscsi (Ubuntu)
Status: Triaged => Invalid
** Changed in: openvpn (Ubuntu)
Status: Confirmed => Invalid
** Changed
** Changed in: dnscrypt-proxy (Ubuntu)
Status: Confirmed => Invalid
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to initramfs-tools in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1713803
Title:
replacement of resolvconf
The resolvconf interface is now implemented in the systemd-resolved
package and integrates correctly with systemd. There is no longer a
need for packages to port away from this interface.
** Changed in: android-androresolvd (Ubuntu)
Status: Triaged => Invalid
** Changed in: avahi (Ubuntu)
Upon further inspection, it turns out that systemd-resolved now
implements the resolvconf interface. We should drop resolvconf and
openresolv now from the archive, and users requesting resolvconf will be
directed to systemd-resolved. Packages which depend/recommend systemd-
resolved will also get
Removing packages from kinetic:
openresolv 3.12.0-2 in kinetic
openresolv 3.12.0-2 in kinetic amd64
openresolv 3.12.0-2 in kinetic arm64
openresolv 3.12.0-2 in kinetic armhf
openresolv 3.12.0-2 in kinetic i386
o
> It's no skin off my nose—if it's deprecated I'll
> find something else to use—but it seems to me that
> if you're going to keep the package in the repository
> you should fix bugs in it.
Can you provide a full upgrade log for the affected system? systemd in
kinetic Recommends: systemd-resolved,
** Tags added: foundations-triage-discuss
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to resolvconf in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1990743
Title:
resolvconf install fails upgrading from Jammy to Kinetic
Status
Given the late glibc change now in flight, I do not think we have the
capacity to take an openssl change this late in the release cycle
without significantly taxing the team to make the release happen.
Especially since the security fixes are low impact and the upstream
release is not security-fix-o
On Thu, Oct 06, 2022 at 07:32:54AM -, msaxl wrote:
> I think the biggest issue is the automatic upgrade from "classic" to
> systemd.socket
> It is very hard to consistently migrate every configuration.
> I was hit by this issue because I had set
> /proc/sys/net/ipv6/bindv6only=1, so ipv4 was
On Thu, Oct 06, 2022 at 02:34:40PM -, Corey Reichle wrote:
> Nowhere was it documented that sshd now needs two configuration files,
> just to tell it to listen on a port, and address it was already told to
> do.
False. It is documented in the manpage, in the default sshd_config file
shipped i
** Tags removed: rls-kk-incoming
** Tags added: rls-kk-notfix
** Tags removed: rls-kk-notfix
** Tags added: rls-kk-notfixing
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to software-properties in
Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpa
** Changed in: binutils-mingw-w64 (Ubuntu)
Status: Fix Released => Triaged
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to binutils in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1971901
Title:
dlltool uses non-unique te
The initramfs-tools behavior is longstanding and deliberate; the systemd
behavior is the buggy deviation.
** Changed in: initramfs-tools (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Invalid
** Changed in: systemd (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Triaged
** Changed in: systemd (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided =
This bug report shows that you were doing a release upgrade from 20.04
to 22.04 on a system which has a separate /boot partition, 461MiB in
size with 81MiB free space; and the system ran out of room while trying
to write out the initramfs for the new kernel.
461MiB is unfortunately on the small si
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 1991592 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1991592
** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 1991592
openssh-server should ship a systemd generator to generate ssh socket port
configuration from sshd_config
--
You received this bug notification be
The error in your log is:
Processing triggers for linux-image-5.15.0-48-generic (5.15.0-48.54) ...
/etc/kernel/postinst.d/initramfs-tools:
update-initramfs: Generating /boot/initrd.img-5.15.0-48-generic
cpio: write error: No space left on device
E: mkinitramfs failure cpio 2
update-initramfs: fail
I cannot reproduce this on jammy.
$ echo "some message" | logger -p auth.info --id="$$"
$ echo $?
0
$
(using auth.info instead of local0.info because I have the former logged
to a log file and the latter not).
** Changed in: util-linux (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Incomplete
--
You received
Also, as this is an rpi4, is this running the armhf port or the arm64
port? (32 or 64 bit)
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to initramfs-tools in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1991324
Title:
Initramfs-
> Loading, please wait...
> /scripts/init-top/udev: line 24: /lib/systemd/systemd-udevd: not found
> Begin: Loading essential drivers ... /init: line 150: modprobe: not found
> /init: line 150: modprobe: not found
So basically, none of the binaries are in the initramfs, or else they're
in the init
** Changed in: openssh (Ubuntu)
Status: In Progress => Fix Committed
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to openssh in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1991283
Title:
"sshd -i" breaks due to socket ac
** Changed in: binutils-mingw-w64 (Ubuntu)
Status: Confirmed => Triaged
** Changed in: binutils-mingw-w64 (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided => Low
** Changed in: binutils (Ubuntu)
Status: Confirmed => Fix Released
** Changed in: binutils-mingw-w64 (Ubuntu)
Status: Triaged =>
** Tags added: foundations-todo
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to apport in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1973470
Title:
Ubuntu-bug command can't find Firefox on Lubuntu Kinetic
Status in Apport:
And the bug report shows this crash happened with python3-apt 1.9.10,
which was a prerelease version of python3-apt before Ubuntu 20.04 LTS
came out. So I'm surprised another user has just marked this bug as
affecting them, causing the report to bubble up to the top. We would
need some concrete e
The stacktrace points to:
File "/usr/lib/python3/dist-packages/apt/package.py", line 541, in _records
if not self.package._pcache._records.lookup(self._cand.file_list[0]):
AttributeError: 'NoneType' object has no attribute 'lookup'
So, reassigning.
** Package changed: update-manager (Ubunt
** Changed in: grub2-signed (Ubuntu)
Status: Confirmed => Triaged
** Changed in: initramfs-tools (Ubuntu)
Status: Confirmed => Won't Fix
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to initramfs-tools in Ubuntu.
** Changed in: openssh (Ubuntu)
Status: In Progress => Fix Committed
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to systemd in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1991199
Title:
sshd port migration is missing tw
** Changed in: openssh (Ubuntu)
Status: Confirmed => Triaged
** Changed in: openssh (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided => High
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to openssh in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.ne
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 1991592 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1991592
** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 1991592
openssh-server should ship a systemd generator to generate ssh socket port
configuration from sshd_config
--
You received this bug notification be
Public bug reported:
A criticism of the existing sshd socket activation implementation is
that Port/ListenAddress options are migrated on a one-time basis at
package upgrade time, and afterwards users get the surprising behavior
that Port/ListenAddress settings added to sshd_config are ignored.
A
Your bug report is against jammy, but socket activation is a default for
ssh only in kinetic. Were you using ubuntu-bug from a different machine
than the one affected?
> In order to make this happen, I had to "break" the socket file
installed by the package at:
> /etc/systemd/system/sockets.targ
I don't have a complete solution to this, but I do have several points.
- debconf prompts on upgrade are not, in general, good UX. It disrupts
the flow of the upgrade. Sometimes it's necessary, but if all it's
doing is telling the user they *may* have a broken config after
upgrading, well, if ev
** Changed in: openssh (Ubuntu)
Importance: Medium => High
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to systemd in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1991199
Title:
sshd port migration is missing two config lines
** Changed in: openssh (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided => Low
** Changed in: openssh (Ubuntu)
Status: New => In Progress
** Changed in: openssh (Ubuntu)
Assignee: (unassigned) => Steve Langasek (vorlon)
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member
I see on review that your patch does fix any broken override files, by
virtue of replaying the same upgrade code if upgrading from 1ubuntu6.
There are some corner cases where that might not be desirable, but as
these are all pre-release versions I think it's ok to ignore these in
favor of landing t
)
Assignee: (unassigned) => Steve Langasek (vorlon)
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to systemd in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1991199
Title:
sshd port migration is missing two config lines from jammy
** Tags removed: foundations-todo
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to binutils in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1971901
Title:
dlltool uses non-unique temp filenames
Status in binutils:
Fix Released
resolvconf has not been installed by default in Ubuntu since before
18.04 LTS and is considered deprecated and should not be used. Is there
a reason that you have the package installed?
** Changed in: resolvconf (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Incomplete
--
You received this bug notification bec
This is a bug in how apt handles phased updates across multiple source
packages currently. The grub SRU has been rolled back to jammy-proposed
now, and an apt fix is in progress, expected to be uploaded early next
week.
** Also affects: apt (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
**
python3{.10,-defaults,-stdlib-extensions} have all had their phasing set
to 100% now to avoid this issue.
** Changed in: python3-defaults (Ubuntu)
Status: Triaged => Fix Released
** Changed in: python3-stdlib-extensions (Ubuntu)
Status: Triaged => Fix Committed
** Changed in: pytho
I think the right fix here is to strip the output of dpkg-buildflags
from the config script output. We've definitely had problems before
where leaking dpkg-buildflags into other build tools made it effectively
impossible for dependent packages to work around toolchain issues.
** Changed in: krb5
Public bug reported:
software-properties still references apt-key, which is deprecated
upstream (https://blog.jak-linux.org/2021/06/20/migrating-away-apt-
key/):
$ grep -r apt-key
tests/test_dbus.py:# test apt-key update
tests/test_aptauth.py:"/usr/bin/apt-key",
tests/test_apt
For the record, showing only the errors, without showing the linker
command that produced them, is not an actionable bug report.
These symbols are certainly present in libudev.so.1 in kinetic so this
is likely not a bug in the Ubuntu systemd package.
--
You received this bug notification because
Public bug reported:
In kinetic, systemd-resolved now Recommends: libnss-resolve, pulling it
into the ubuntu-minimal seed.
In the past we briefly had libnss-resolve seeded (between xenial and
bionic LTSes but not in any LTS) but it was removed because:
- it was redundant; /etc/resolv.conf was c
Images building successfully now.
** Changed in: live-build (Ubuntu)
Status: Confirmed => Invalid
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to systemd in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1988772
Title:
kin
If the systemd-resolved postinst doesn't work correctly in a chroot, I
think the problem needs to be fixed there, not worked around in the live
build system
** Also affects: systemd (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
--
You received this bug notification because you are a membe
Hello msaxl, or anyone else affected,
Accepted qtbase-opensource-src into jammy-proposed. The package will
build now and be available at
https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/qtbase-opensource-
src/5.15.3+dfsg-2ubuntu0.2 in a few hours, and then in the -proposed
repository.
Please help us by testi
Not sure of the utility of getting a change like this into kinetic, but
it's certainly low risk based on the description, so approved.
** Changed in: elfutils (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Fix Committed
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packag
An upload of apport to jammy-proposed has been rejected from the upload
queue for the following reason: "contains bugfixes without bug
references or test cases, does not meet SRU policy".
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subs
An upload of apport to jammy-proposed has been rejected from the upload
queue for the following reason: "contains bugfixes without bug
references or test cases, does not meet SRU policy".
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subs
An upload of apport to jammy-proposed has been rejected from the upload
queue for the following reason: "contains bugfixes without bug
references or test cases, does not meet SRU policy".
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subs
An upload of apport to jammy-proposed has been rejected from the upload
queue for the following reason: "contains bugfixes without bug
references or test cases, does not meet SRU policy".
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subs
An upload of apport to jammy-proposed has been rejected from the upload
queue for the following reason: "contains bugfixes without bug
references or test cases, does not meet SRU policy".
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subs
An upload of apport to jammy-proposed has been rejected from the upload
queue for the following reason: "contains bugfixes without bug
references or test cases, does not meet SRU policy".
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subs
An upload of apport to jammy-proposed has been rejected from the upload
queue for the following reason: "contains bugfixes without bug
references or test cases, does not meet SRU policy".
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subs
An upload of apport to jammy-proposed has been rejected from the upload
queue for the following reason: "contains bugfixes without bug
references or test cases, does not meet SRU policy".
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subs
An upload of apport to jammy-proposed has been rejected from the upload
queue for the following reason: "contains bugfixes without bug
references or test cases, does not meet SRU policy".
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subs
An upload of apport to jammy-proposed has been rejected from the upload
queue for the following reason: "contains bugfixes without bug
references or test cases, does not meet SRU policy".
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subs
Removing packages from kinetic:
wpewebkit 2.36.6-1 in kinetic
libwpewebkit-1.0-doc 2.36.6-1 in kinetic amd64
libwpewebkit-1.0-doc 2.36.6-1 in kinetic arm64
libwpewebkit-1.0-doc 2.36.6-1 in kinetic armhf
libwpewebkit-1.0-doc 2.3
(and blacklisted)
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to gst-plugins-bad1.0 in
Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1981592
Title:
Please remove wpewebkit and block syncs from Debian
Status in cog package in Ub
Removing packages from kinetic:
cog 0.14.0-1 in kinetic
cog 0.14.0-1 in kinetic amd64
cog 0.14.0-1 in kinetic arm64
cog 0.14.0-1 in kinetic armhf
cog 0.14.0-1 in kinetic ppc64el
cog 0.14.0-1 in kinetic riscv64
No, this is only about removing it from container and cloud images.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to ubuntu-meta in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1981109
Title:
server image pulls in ModemManager vi
An upload of isc-dhcp to jammy-proposed has been rejected from the
upload queue for the following reason: "reuploading with the correct fix
from kinetic".
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to isc-dhcp in Ubuntu.
htt
The version of shadow in the proposed pocket of Xenial that was
purported to fix this bug report has been removed because the bugs that
were to be fixed by the upload were not verified in a timely (105 days)
fashion.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch s
The version of shadow in the proposed pocket of Xenial that was
purported to fix this bug report has been removed because the bugs that
were to be fixed by the upload were not verified in a timely (105 days)
fashion.
** Tags removed: verification-needed-xenial
** Changed in: shadow (Ubuntu Xenial
The version of shadow in the proposed pocket of Xenial that was
purported to fix this bug report has been removed because the bugs that
were to be fixed by the upload were not verified in a timely (105 days)
fashion.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch s
The version of shadow in the proposed pocket of Xenial that was
purported to fix this bug report has been removed because the bugs that
were to be fixed by the upload were not verified in a timely (105 days)
fashion.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch s
Hello Sergio, or anyone else affected,
Accepted openldap into jammy-proposed. The package will build now and be
available at
https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/openldap/2.5.13+dfsg-0ubuntu0.22.04.1
in a few hours, and then in the -proposed repository.
Please help us by testing this new package.
Hello Jeremy, or anyone else affected,
Accepted evolution-data-server into jammy-proposed. The package will
build now and be available at
https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/evolution-data-
server/3.44.4-0ubuntu1 in a few hours, and then in the -proposed
repository.
Please help us by testing thi
This bug report lacks the 'Where problems could occur' section of the
SRU bug template.
** Changed in: sudo (Ubuntu Jammy)
Status: Fix Committed => Incomplete
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to sudo in Ubu
I don't believe MIR is required for binary packages unless they have
been excluded from main for a reason as part of a prior MIR. You should
only need to seed it.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to krb5 in Ubuntu
Someone needs to update gst-plugins-bad1.0 to not depend on this before
the removal can proceed.
** Also affects: cog (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
** Also affects: gst-plugins-bad1.0 (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
** Changed in: wpewebkit (Ubuntu)
This does not look like an Ubuntu bug. You have the most recent jammy
version of dpkg installed on your system according to your bug report,
however the upgrade failure shows an internal error when trying to
invoke 'dpkg --valiate-version' from dpkg-maintscript-helper.
What does `which dpkg` retu
Hello bugproxy, or anyone else affected,
Accepted zlib into jammy-proposed. The package will build now and be
available at
https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/zlib/1:1.2.11.dfsg-2ubuntu9.1 in a
few hours, and then in the -proposed repository.
Please help us by testing this new package. See
http
Hello bugproxy, or anyone else affected,
Accepted bedtools into jammy-proposed. The package will build now and be
available at
https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/bedtools/2.30.0+dfsg-2ubuntu0.1 in
a few hours, and then in the -proposed repository.
Please help us by testing this new package. Se
The question regarding partner usage of dhclient is in progress
elsewhere and does not block this SRU.
** Changed in: isc-dhcp (Ubuntu Jammy)
Status: Incomplete => Fix Committed
** Tags added: verification-needed verification-needed-jammy
--
You received this bug notification because you
Hello Pedro, or anyone else affected,
Accepted isc-dhcp into jammy-proposed. The package will build now and be
available at https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/isc-
dhcp/4.4.1-2.3ubuntu2.2 in a few hours, and then in the -proposed
repository.
Please help us by testing this new package. See
http
(Ubuntu)
Assignee: (unassigned) => Steve Langasek (vorlon)
** Changed in: isc-dhcp (Ubuntu Jammy)
Assignee: (unassigned) => Steve Langasek (vorlon)
** Changed in: isc-dhcp (Ubuntu)
Status: Confirmed => Fix Committed
--
You received this bug notification because you are
** Package changed: busybox (Ubuntu Jammy) => isc-dhcp (Ubuntu Jammy)
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to isc-dhcp in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1937110
Title:
dhcp option 121 & 249
Status in subiq
Hello bugproxy, or anyone else affected,
Accepted zlib into focal-proposed. The package will build now and be
available at
https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/zlib/1:1.2.11.dfsg-2ubuntu1.4 in a
few hours, and then in the -proposed repository.
Please help us by testing this new package. See
http
Hello bugproxy, or anyone else affected,
Accepted htslib into focal-proposed. The package will build now and be
available at
https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/htslib/1.10.2-3ubuntu0.1 in a few
hours, and then in the -proposed repository.
Please help us by testing this new package. See
https:/
** Changed in: livecd-rootfs (Ubuntu)
Status: In Progress => Fix Committed
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to ubuntu-meta in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1981109
Title:
server image pulls in M
This fix was incomplete; because all of these packages were installed as
part of a task (ubuntu-server), they are all marked as manually
installed. So additional changes are needed to remove the packages
pulled in by fwupd.
** Changed in: livecd-rootfs (Ubuntu)
Status: Fix Released => In P
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 1977493 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1977493
** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 1977493
Upgrade from Ubuntu 21.10 to 22.04 fails - unmet dependencies: libpam-modules
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubu
The message in the terminal output explains that pam_tally is obsolete,
and must be replaced in your config before you can upgrade.
Did you use do-release-upgrade for this upgrade or was it manual?
** Changed in: pam (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Incomplete
--
You received this bug notificatio
** Also affects: ubuntu-meta (Ubuntu Jammy)
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
** Also affects: livecd-rootfs (Ubuntu Jammy)
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
** Also affects: modemmanager (Ubuntu Jammy)
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
** Also affects: fwupd (Ubunt
fwupd it happens pulls in not only ModemManager but also udisks2, so
there are two daemons running in every container as a result of fwupd's
presence.
Having discussed with the CPC team, it doesn't make sense to include
fwupd in any cloud or container images, unless there's a particular
partner im
Public bug reported:
On a default idle Ubuntu kinetic container, the second largest process
by resident memory is '/usr/share/unattended-upgrades/unattended-
upgrade-shutdown --wait-for-signal'.
We want unattended-upgrades to be installed by default in all container
images, but this process is he
** Changed in: alsa-plugins (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Fix Committed
** Changed in: alsa-plugins (Ubuntu)
Assignee: (unassigned) => Steve Langasek (vorlon)
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed t
This package has now been dropped, the rationale for a separate source
package no longer applies. This will be integrated into alsa-plugins
directly.
** Changed in: alsa-plugins-extra (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Won't Fix
** Also affects: alsa-plugins (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided
401 - 500 of 1001 matches
Mail list logo
