[Touch-packages] [Bug 1595607] Re: /bin/nano:*** Error in `nano': free(): invalid next size (normal): ADDR ***

2017-01-24 Thread Launchpad Bug Tracker
This bug was fixed in the package nano - 2.5.3-2ubuntu1 --- nano (2.5.3-2ubuntu1) xenial-proposed; urgency=medium * Apply upstream patch to not call free on the result of a dirname. (LP: #1595607) -- Brian Murray Thu, 15 Dec 2016 15:30:45 -0800 ** Changed

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1595607] Re: /bin/nano:*** Error in `nano': free(): invalid next size (normal): ADDR ***

2017-01-20 Thread Brian Murray
** Tags removed: verification-needed ** Tags added: verification-done -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to nano in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1595607 Title: /bin/nano:*** Error in `nano': free():

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1595607] Re: /bin/nano:*** Error in `nano': free(): invalid next size (normal): ADDR ***

2017-01-20 Thread Brian Murray
To get an idea of the number of users of the proposed package I filtered for crashes from Ubuntu 16.04 and with the proposed version of the package: https://errors.ubuntu.com/?release=Ubuntu%2016.04=nano=month=2.5.3-2ubuntu1 Looking at some of the individual buckets we can see quite a few people

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1595607] Re: /bin/nano:*** Error in `nano': free(): invalid next size (normal): ADDR ***

2017-01-20 Thread Sebastien Bacher
there are no e.u.c reports from the new version (though the numbers were not that high with the current one so it means not many users are hitting the issue and that it could be that none of the proposed testers hit it yet) nor regressions/new bugs reported and nano seems to work fine, probably

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1595607] Re: /bin/nano:*** Error in `nano': free(): invalid next size (normal): ADDR ***

2016-12-16 Thread Brian Murray
** Description changed: + [Test Case] + Using the provided Error Tracker bucket confirm that there are no instances of the crash with the version of the package from -proposed. Given that we don't have a reproducer we should let the package age for longer than 7 days to ensure many users are

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1595607] Re: /bin/nano:*** Error in `nano': free(): invalid next size (normal): ADDR ***

2016-12-16 Thread Timo Aaltonen
Hello errors.ubuntu.com, or anyone else affected, Accepted nano into xenial-proposed. The package will build now and be available at https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/nano/2.5.3-2ubuntu1 in a few hours, and then in the -proposed repository. Please help us by testing this new package. See

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1595607] Re: /bin/nano:*** Error in `nano': free(): invalid next size (normal): ADDR ***

2016-12-16 Thread Timo Aaltonen
bug description probably could be more like the SRU guidelines ask, but looks like there is no clear test case, so I've acked the upload -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to nano in Ubuntu.

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1595607] Re: /bin/nano:*** Error in `nano': free(): invalid next size (normal): ADDR ***

2016-12-15 Thread Brian Murray
This fix made it into Yakkety and Zesty, but not Xenial. I've uploaded a fix to the Xenial SRU queue for review by the Ubuntu SRU team. ** Also affects: nano (Ubuntu Xenial) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Changed in: nano (Ubuntu Xenial) Status: New => In Progress **

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1595607] Re: /bin/nano:*** Error in `nano': free(): invalid next size (normal): ADDR ***

2016-06-25 Thread Benno Schulenberg
I am quite willing to work on this issue, but... don't make me jump through hoops just to see the crash report. (Take an example from Fedora, where such reports are freely accessible (for example, https://retrace.fedoraproject.org/faf/reports/1181921/). I don't need heaps of information -- a