(re-opening and tagging as blocked by ff for our tracking script)
** Changed in: pango1.0 (Ubuntu)
Status: Won't Fix => Triaged
** Summary changed:
- [ffe] Update to 1.44.6
+ Don't update to 1.44.6 this cycle
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
On Mon, Sep 23, 2019 at 10:12:14AM -, Sebastien Bacher wrote:
> We failed to have consensus in Paris and I feel like it's getting late
> now and we have enough other work to do to wrap the cycle so would
> prefer to delay to next cycle now. Iain, what do you think? (you opened
> the FFe but so
We failed to have consensus in Paris and I feel like it's getting late
now and we have enough other work to do to wrap the cycle so would
prefer to delay to next cycle now. Iain, what do you think? (you opened
the FFe but so you should be the one deciding if we withdraw the
request)
** Changed
Feel free then, I'm just really unsure personally about us being able to
fix regressions, but if you think that is an OK risk then fine.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to pango1.0 in Ubuntu.
I'm unsure we have someone in the team/around who knows enough about
font rendering to weigh in. I would go forward now with the update
because I feel like it's a safer road for the LTS to land changes
earlier than later, that time we get one buffer nonLTS cycle to get
feedback sort out issues
It's more like issues with differences in rendering, e.g.:
- https://github.com/harfbuzz/harfbuzz/issues/1892
- https://gitlab.com/inkscape/inkscape/issues/364
I'm a bit clueless here, would be happy for someone else to weigh in :-)
** Bug watch added: github.com/harfbuzz/harfbuzz/issues
I installed the ppa version on my eoan system, works fine, including
french accents ;-)
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to pango1.0 in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1842643
Title:
[ffe] Update to
On Fri, Sep 06, 2019 at 11:35:47AM -, Łukasz Zemczak wrote:
> This looks good in overall. I trust that you are confident that the new
> pango1.0 will migrate without any bigger issues, especially seeing how many
> reverse-dependencies it has. I also hope there is no ABI break introduced in
This looks good in overall. I trust that you are confident that the new
pango1.0 will migrate without any bigger issues, especially seeing how many
reverse-dependencies it has. I also hope there is no ABI break introduced in
the two new versions? The changelogs do not seem to mention anything
I've just built it here:
https://launchpad.net/~laney/+archive/ubuntu/ppa/+sourcepub/10458725
/+listing-archive-extra
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to pango1.0 in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1842643
10 matches
Mail list logo
