[Touch-packages] [Bug 1972654] Re: [security review] Sync policykit-1 0.120-6 (main) from Debian experimental

2022-10-13 Thread Jeremy Bicha
policykit-1 121+compat0.1-5 is now in Debian Unstable. Could I get a clear answer from the Ubuntu Security Team if this is acceptable to autosync when Ubuntu 23.04 development opens? ** Tags added: block-proposed ** Summary changed: - [security review] Sync policykit-1 0.120-6 (main) from

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1972654] Re: [security review] Sync policykit-1 0.120-6 (main) from Debian experimental

2022-09-12 Thread Marc Deslauriers
I also don't think this is a blocker anymore, as long as polkitd-pkla is a strong dependency in Ubuntu, so we don't inadvertently stop shipping it. It would be nice to get a similar list of packages in Ubuntu, as I suspect we have many more than Debian. We may also need to update the

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1972654] Re: [security review] Sync policykit-1 0.120-6 (main) from Debian experimental

2022-09-02 Thread Alex Murray
> I do not intend to take further action to modify those packages. If it is a > blocker for Ubuntu > that they are fixed, then someone from Ubuntu will need to do that work. Given the relationship between the packages has now changed - ie. polkitd-pkla is not mutually exclusive from the

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1972654] Re: [security review] Sync policykit-1 0.120-6 (main) from Debian experimental

2022-09-01 Thread Simon McVittie
As of version 121+compat0.1-1, the relationship between packages has changed to this: * polkitd always requires polkitd-javascript and duktape, and always interprets JavaScript policies * polkitd-pkla is now an optional addon (the upstream polkit-pkla-compat project, as shipped in e.g. Fedora)

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1972654] Re: [security review] Sync policykit-1 0.120-6 (main) from Debian experimental

2022-06-08 Thread Simon McVittie
More discussion here: https://salsa.debian.org/utopia- team/polkit/-/merge_requests/6 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to policykit-1 in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1972654 Title: [security review]

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1972654] Re: [security review] Sync policykit-1 0.120-6 (main) from Debian experimental

2022-06-08 Thread Simon McVittie
> There was a proposal to use duktape instead of mozjs for the JavaScript > interpreter but I don't think that's been merged yet. This was merged upstream, but unfortunately there has not yet been a release that contains this change. I don't really want to use an arbitrary git snapshot for

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1972654] Re: [security review] Sync policykit-1 0.120-6 (main) from Debian experimental

2022-06-06 Thread Marc Deslauriers
My understanding is the Debian experimental version doesn't support both at the same time, it's one or the other depending on which binary package you install. We definitely don't want that. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1972654] Re: [security review] Sync policykit-1 0.120-6 (main) from Debian experimental

2022-06-06 Thread Jeremy Bicha
Marc, the current Debian experimental version supports both PKLA and JS policy files. Are you saying that you only want one style to be supported in an Ubuntu release? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1972654] Re: [security review] Sync policykit-1 0.120-6 (main) from Debian experimental

2022-05-09 Thread Marc Deslauriers
We do not want policykit to use the unmaintainable mozjs backend. That would be a hard NACK from the Security Team. The duktape backend has been merged upstream. So in order to sync this to Ubuntu, the following must be done: 1- Get Debian to switch to the duktape backend 2- Get Debian to