> Apologies, I saw the same issue locally fixed it but must have
forgotten to build a new .dsc:/
No worries; thanks for mentioning!
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to base-files in Ubuntu.
Apologies, I saw the same issue locally fixed it but must have forgotten
to build a new .dsc:/
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to base-files in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2054925
Title:
The changes for Focal had a syntax error (double ';;' lines, not present
in Jammy) which causes debootstrap to fail early and silently, even for
a previously working series.
Original:
$ sudo debootstrap --variant=minbase focal /tmp/debootstrap.focal
http://br.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu
Testing with the change applied:
$ sudo debootstrap --variant=minbase noble /tmp/debootstrap.noble
http://br.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu
...
I: Base system installed successfully.
$ echo $?
0
$ ls -l /tmp/debootstrap.noble/ | grep usr/
This bug was fixed in the package debootstrap - 1.0.126+nmu1ubuntu0.7
---
debootstrap (1.0.126+nmu1ubuntu0.7) jammy; urgency=medium
* Disable usrmerge code on noble+ as they ship symlinks in base-files,
and the code is incompatible (and no longer needed) (LP: #2054925)
On
root@known-seal:~# apt policy debootstrap
debootstrap:
Installed: 1.0.126+nmu1ubuntu0.7
Candidate: 1.0.126+nmu1ubuntu0.7
Version table:
*** 1.0.126+nmu1ubuntu0.7 500
500 http://archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu jammy-proposed/main amd64 Packages
500
The regression in debuerreotype is expected due to the included change
from the previous SRU (LP: #1990856), packages are now extracted in a
different order for the test case, hence some time stamps shifted.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded
Building an noble image with ubuntu-image, using debootstrap
1.0.126+nmu1ubuntu0.7, worked (on a amd64 Jammy).
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to base-files in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2054925
debootstrap 1.0.126+nmu1ubuntu0.7 tested and verified successfully on my
amd64 Jammy install. Thanks!
Now, with the above ppc64el regression warning from ubuntu-sru-bot in
mind, I will refrain from changing the tag to verification-done until
devs address it and/or advise.
--
You received this
** Description changed:
[Impact]
The last couple of days, I have been unable to run a successful debootstrap
for Noble Numbat.
Apparently this is caused by the addition of symlinks (/bin, /lib,
/lib64 and /sbin) in base-files 13ubuntu7. According to debootstrap.log,
it fails to
Hello Åka, or anyone else affected,
Accepted debootstrap into jammy-proposed. The package will build now and
be available at
https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/debootstrap/1.0.126+nmu1ubuntu0.7
in a few hours, and then in the -proposed repository.
Please help us by testing this new package.
I confirmed that the resulting target dir of debootstrap in Jammy (with
patch/MERGED_USR=no) and Mantic is the same, with a comparison of `ls
-lR` (normalized for Month/Day/Time fields).
...
Test command for Jammy (patched) and Mantic:
# debootstrap --arch=amd64 --variant=minbase --keyring
Slrry I can make this clearer too by adding a mantic task and marking it
as fix released.
** Also affects: base-files (Ubuntu Mantic)
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
** Also affects: debootstrap (Ubuntu Mantic)
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
** Changed in: debootstrap
TL;DR: The fix is not needed on Mantic.
This is just to expand a bit on the brief note in '[Where problems could
occur]' ("moved to merging post-extraction"), for clarity.
The code in `scripts/gutsy` (used for noble) is different between Mantic
and Jammy with regards to the order of package
** Description changed:
[Impact]
The last couple of days, I have been unable to run a successful debootstrap
for Noble Numbat.
Apparently this is caused by the addition of symlinks (/bin, /lib,
/lib64 and /sbin) in base-files 13ubuntu7. According to debootstrap.log,
it fails to
** Changed in: debootstrap (Ubuntu Focal)
Status: Triaged => In Progress
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to base-files in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2054925
Title:
Debootstrap fails for
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to base-files in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2054925
Title:
Debootstrap fails for Noble with base-files 13ubuntu7
Status in base-files package in Ubuntu:
Won't Fix
** Description changed:
[Impact]
The last couple of days, I have been unable to run a successful debootstrap
for Noble Numbat.
Apparently this is caused by the addition of symlinks (/bin, /lib,
/lib64 and /sbin) in base-files 13ubuntu7. According to debootstrap.log,
it fails to
** Changed in: debootstrap (Ubuntu Jammy)
Status: Triaged => In Progress
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to base-files in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2054925
Title:
Debootstrap fails for
** Description changed:
- The last couple of days, I have been unable to run a successful
- debootstrap for Noble Numbat.
+ [Impact]
+ The last couple of days, I have been unable to run a successful debootstrap
for Noble Numbat.
Apparently this is caused by the addition of symlinks (/bin,
Also, many thanks for the workaround. I can confirm it works in my case.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to base-files in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2054925
Title:
Debootstrap fails for Noble with
Apologies Julian, I completely forgot to include details of my (Jammy /
22.04) build host which would have avoided the confusion. Adding it to
the report now (although I know it is sort of too late at this point).
** Description changed:
The last couple of days, I have been unable to run a
As a workaround, --no-merged-usr probably should work fine in old
releases. It might be easier to add this to the script as a special case
for > noble than backporting new logic we don't need anymore.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages,
I forgot we can't rely on preinst in bootstrap so backporting the
debootstrap change it will have to be.
** Changed in: base-files (Ubuntu)
Status: Incomplete => Won't Fix
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed
I wrote instead but of course it's in addition, I think that's probably
the easier outcome than trying to workaround it in the base-files
preinst. Consulting with helmut
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to
Let me move this to debootstrap tasks instead, I guess we should fix the
LTS debootstraps.
** Changed in: debootstrap (Ubuntu Focal)
Status: New => Triaged
** Changed in: debootstrap (Ubuntu Jammy)
Status: New => Triaged
--
You received this bug notification because you are a
Steve I'm sorry but I cannot reproduce this. I have verified this
countless of times during working on this and I am also unable to verify
this here:
# apt policy debootstrap
debootstrap:
Installed: 1.0.134ubuntu1
Candidate: 1.0.134ubuntu1
Version table:
*** 1.0.134ubuntu1 500
500
** Tags added: rls-nn-incoming
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to base-files in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2054925
Title:
Debootstrap fails for Noble with base-files 13ubuntu7
Status in
** Changed in: base-files (Ubuntu)
Assignee: (unassigned) => Julian Andres Klode (juliank)
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to base-files in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2054925
Title:
** Attachment added: "Output of debootstrap and debootstrap.log"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/base-files/+bug/2054925/+attachment/5749151/+files/2024.02.25_debootstrap_base-files.13ubuntu7.vs.13ubuntu6.log
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
30 matches
Mail list logo
