[Touch-packages] [Bug 1921452] Re: [SRU] alsa-lib: conf: USB - add "Cmedia Audio" to USB-Audio.pcm.iec958_device

2021-03-25 Thread Hui Wang
** Description changed:

  [SRU] alsa-lib: conf: USB - add "Cmedia Audio" to USB-
  Audio.pcm.iec958_device
  
  Just for tracking now.
  
  [Impact]
  
  [Fix]
  
  [Test Case]
  
- [Regression Risk]
+ [Where problems could occur]

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to alsa-lib in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1921452

Title:
  [SRU] alsa-lib: conf: USB - add "Cmedia Audio" to USB-
  Audio.pcm.iec958_device

Status in ALSA Libraries:
  New
Status in alsa-lib package in Ubuntu:
  New
Status in alsa-lib source package in Focal:
  New
Status in alsa-lib source package in Groovy:
  New
Status in alsa-lib source package in Hirsute:
  New

Bug description:
  [SRU] alsa-lib: conf: USB - add "Cmedia Audio" to USB-
  Audio.pcm.iec958_device

  Just for tracking now.

  [Impact]

  [Fix]

  [Test Case]

  [Where problems could occur]

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/alsa-lib/+bug/1921452/+subscriptions

-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
Post to : touch-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


[Touch-packages] [Bug 1920987] Re: IANA tzdata file format cannot represent different country code for a given timezone in different time periods [ i.e. Europe/Simferopol country code changes ]; iso 3

2021-03-25 Thread Alexander
Oh, that's so sweet... when I read this endless memoir about codes of
conduct and the importance of democratic institutions, written in
English. I think only of the Overton window system, and I only remember
that after a very hard war, seeing that the British Empire would fall,
Truman introduced the Soviet deterrent system, which is projected to
this day, and I see it not as a deterrent system, but as a knife in the
back... this is the whole importance of passing through a thousand words
and gigabytes of code to justify simple things. While they will fool you
with their rules, at the same time they will create lawlessness
themselves, for this they write their rules. I remember how the USSR was
destroyed, how the Crimea was removed from the USSR, I remember these
hordes of Uzbeks with signs on their necks "our Crimea". I see what is
happening now around the Crimean peninsula, these claims, attacks and
sanctions... in order to change the opinion of the Crimeans. And believe
me, I still behave more than correctly when I write all this. After all,
if you were left in your infancy just in the woods, you would be the
default animal. You wouldn't be able to read or write until you were
taught to do so. In another case, if you are placed in an information
vacuum and raised in total Russophobia (which includes racism, fascism
and nazism), you will already turn into a completely different animal.
But the point will be the same.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to iso-codes in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1920987

Title:
  IANA tzdata file format cannot represent different country code for a
  given timezone in different time periods [ i.e. Europe/Simferopol
  country code changes ]; iso 3166-2 has no RU subdivisions for Crimea

Status in iso-codes package in Ubuntu:
  New
Status in tzdata package in Ubuntu:
  Opinion

Bug description:
  Europe/Simferopol,  Crimea is RUSSIA

  ProblemType: Bug
  DistroRelease: Ubuntu 21.04
  Package: tzdata 2021a-1ubuntu1
  ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 5.11.0-11.12-generic 5.11.0
  Uname: Linux 5.11.0-11-generic x86_64
  ApportVersion: 2.20.11-0ubuntu60
  Architecture: amd64
  CurrentDesktop: MATE
  Date: Tue Mar 23 21:44:56 2021
  InstallationDate: Installed on 2021-03-21 (1 days ago)
  InstallationMedia: Ubuntu-MATE 21.04 "Hirsute Hippo" - Alpha amd64 (20210321)
  PackageArchitecture: all
  SourcePackage: tzdata
  UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install)

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/iso-codes/+bug/1920987/+subscriptions

-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
Post to : touch-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


[Touch-packages] [Bug 1921452] Re: [SRU] alsa-lib: conf: USB - add "Cmedia Audio" to USB-Audio.pcm.iec958_device

2021-03-25 Thread Shengyao Xue
This is the debdiff for hirsute, thanks.

** Patch added: "alsa-lib_1.2.4-1.1build1ubuntu1.debdiff"
   
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/alsa-lib/+bug/1921452/+attachment/5481031/+files/alsa-lib_1.2.4-1.1build1ubuntu1.debdiff

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to alsa-lib in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1921452

Title:
  [SRU] alsa-lib: conf: USB - add "Cmedia Audio" to USB-
  Audio.pcm.iec958_device

Status in ALSA Libraries:
  New
Status in alsa-lib package in Ubuntu:
  New
Status in alsa-lib source package in Focal:
  New
Status in alsa-lib source package in Groovy:
  New
Status in alsa-lib source package in Hirsute:
  New

Bug description:
  [SRU] alsa-lib: conf: USB - add "Cmedia Audio" to USB-
  Audio.pcm.iec958_device

  Just for tracking now.

  [Impact]

  [Fix]

  [Test Case]

  [Regression Risk]

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/alsa-lib/+bug/1921452/+subscriptions

-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
Post to : touch-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


[Touch-packages] [Bug 1921452] Re: [SRU] alsa-lib: conf: USB - add "Cmedia Audio" to USB-Audio.pcm.iec958_device

2021-03-25 Thread Shengyao Xue
** Changed in: alsa-lib (Ubuntu Hirsute)
 Assignee: (unassigned) => Shengyao Xue (xueshengyao)

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to alsa-lib in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1921452

Title:
  [SRU] alsa-lib: conf: USB - add "Cmedia Audio" to USB-
  Audio.pcm.iec958_device

Status in ALSA Libraries:
  New
Status in alsa-lib package in Ubuntu:
  New
Status in alsa-lib source package in Focal:
  New
Status in alsa-lib source package in Groovy:
  New
Status in alsa-lib source package in Hirsute:
  New

Bug description:
  [SRU] alsa-lib: conf: USB - add "Cmedia Audio" to USB-
  Audio.pcm.iec958_device

  Just for tracking now.

  [Impact]

  [Fix]

  [Test Case]

  [Regression Risk]

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/alsa-lib/+bug/1921452/+subscriptions

-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
Post to : touch-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


[Touch-packages] [Bug 1921452] Re: [SRU] alsa-lib: conf: USB - add "Cmedia Audio" to USB-Audio.pcm.iec958_device

2021-03-25 Thread Hui Wang
** Also affects: alsa-lib (Ubuntu Groovy)
   Importance: Undecided
   Status: New

** Also affects: alsa-lib (Ubuntu Hirsute)
   Importance: Undecided
   Status: New

** Also affects: alsa-lib (Ubuntu Focal)
   Importance: Undecided
   Status: New

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to alsa-lib in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1921452

Title:
  [SRU] alsa-lib: conf: USB - add "Cmedia Audio" to USB-
  Audio.pcm.iec958_device

Status in ALSA Libraries:
  New
Status in alsa-lib package in Ubuntu:
  New
Status in alsa-lib source package in Focal:
  New
Status in alsa-lib source package in Groovy:
  New
Status in alsa-lib source package in Hirsute:
  New

Bug description:
  [SRU] alsa-lib: conf: USB - add "Cmedia Audio" to USB-
  Audio.pcm.iec958_device

  Just for tracking now.

  [Impact]

  [Fix]

  [Test Case]

  [Regression Risk]

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/alsa-lib/+bug/1921452/+subscriptions

-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
Post to : touch-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


[Touch-packages] [Bug 1921452] [NEW] [SRU] alsa-lib: conf: USB - add "Cmedia Audio" to USB-Audio.pcm.iec958_device

2021-03-25 Thread Shengyao Xue
Public bug reported:

[SRU] alsa-lib: conf: USB - add "Cmedia Audio" to USB-
Audio.pcm.iec958_device

Just for tracking now.

[Impact]

[Fix]

[Test Case]

[Regression Risk]

** Affects: alsa-lib
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New

** Affects: alsa-lib (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Assignee: Shengyao Xue (xueshengyao)
 Status: New

** Affects: alsa-lib (Ubuntu Focal)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New

** Affects: alsa-lib (Ubuntu Groovy)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New

** Affects: alsa-lib (Ubuntu Hirsute)
 Importance: Undecided
 Assignee: Shengyao Xue (xueshengyao)
 Status: New

** Also affects: alsa-lib
   Importance: Undecided
   Status: New

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to alsa-lib in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1921452

Title:
  [SRU] alsa-lib: conf: USB - add "Cmedia Audio" to USB-
  Audio.pcm.iec958_device

Status in ALSA Libraries:
  New
Status in alsa-lib package in Ubuntu:
  New
Status in alsa-lib source package in Focal:
  New
Status in alsa-lib source package in Groovy:
  New
Status in alsa-lib source package in Hirsute:
  New

Bug description:
  [SRU] alsa-lib: conf: USB - add "Cmedia Audio" to USB-
  Audio.pcm.iec958_device

  Just for tracking now.

  [Impact]

  [Fix]

  [Test Case]

  [Regression Risk]

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/alsa-lib/+bug/1921452/+subscriptions

-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
Post to : touch-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


[Touch-packages] [Bug 1896171] Re: Wayland GL apps appear corrupt on Raspberry Pi 4B (v3d driver)

2021-03-25 Thread Treviño
** Changed in: mutter (Ubuntu)
   Status: Fix Committed => In Progress

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to mesa in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1896171

Title:
  Wayland GL apps appear corrupt on Raspberry Pi 4B (v3d driver)

Status in Mutter:
  Unknown
Status in mesa package in Ubuntu:
  Won't Fix
Status in mutter package in Ubuntu:
  In Progress

Bug description:
  Wayland GL apps appear corrupt on Raspberry Pi 4B (v3d driver).

  Seen in glmark2-wayland, glmark2-es2-wayland, weston-simple-egl.

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/mutter/+bug/1896171/+subscriptions

-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
Post to : touch-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


[Touch-packages] [Bug 1693900] Re: apt-get update should return exit code != 0 on error

2021-03-25 Thread Bug Watch Updater
** Changed in: apt (Debian)
   Status: Unknown => Fix Released

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to apt in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1693900

Title:
  apt-get update should return exit code != 0 on error

Status in apt package in Ubuntu:
  Fix Released
Status in apt source package in Xenial:
  Confirmed
Status in apt source package in Bionic:
  Fix Committed
Status in apt source package in Focal:
  Fix Committed
Status in apt source package in Groovy:
  Fix Committed
Status in apt package in Debian:
  Fix Released

Bug description:
  [Impact]
  There is no way for scripts to run apt update and be sure that it was 
entirely successful.

  We introduce a new flag, --error-on=any that makes apt update also
  error out on transient errors.

  [Test plan]
  We have included a test in the test-suite in 
test-apt-update-failure-propagation that ensures that warnings become errors.

  [Where problems could occur]
  If there's an issue some warnings for transient errors could become errors, 
or worse I suppose it's possible but unlikely for errors to be reported as 
warnings...

  Since the new behavior is behind a flag, regression potential for
  existing scripts is low if there is no bug.

  [Original bug report]

  When running 'apt-get update' (e.g. on a container install post-
  install script), apt-get return with exit code 0, even so it wasn't
  able to "update" properly. E.g.:

  + apt-get update
  Err:1 http://de.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu xenial InRelease
    Temporary failure resolving 'de.archive.ubuntu.com'
  Err:2 http://security.ubuntu.com/ubuntu xenial-security InRelease
    Temporary failure resolving 'security.ubuntu.com'
  Err:3 http://de.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu xenial-updates InRelease
    Temporary failure resolving 'de.archive.ubuntu.com'
  Reading package lists... Done
  W: Failed to fetch http://de.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/dists/xenial/InRelease 
 Temporary failure resolving 'de.archive.ubuntu.com'
  W: Failed to fetch 
http://de.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/dists/xenial-updates/InRelease  Temporary 
failure resolving 'de.archive.ubuntu.com'
  W: Failed to fetch 
http://security.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/dists/xenial-security/InRelease  Temporary 
failure resolving 'security.ubuntu.com'
  W: Some index files failed to download. They have been ignored, or old ones 
used instead.

  It should be corrected to return useful exit code, so that scripts can
  take the appropriate actions ...

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/apt/+bug/1693900/+subscriptions

-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
Post to : touch-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


[Touch-packages] [Bug 1723585] Re: need help

2021-03-25 Thread Daniel van Vugt
What is the problem you were reporting? Is it still happening?

** Package changed: xorg (Ubuntu) => ubuntu

** Changed in: ubuntu
   Status: New => Incomplete

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to xorg in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1723585

Title:
  need help

Status in Ubuntu:
  Incomplete

Bug description:
  Thank you

  ProblemType: Bug
  DistroRelease: Ubuntu 16.04
  Package: xorg 1:7.7+13ubuntu3
  ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 4.10.0-37.41~16.04.1-generic 4.10.17
  Uname: Linux 4.10.0-37-generic x86_64
  .tmp.unity_support_test.0:
   
  ApportVersion: 2.20.1-0ubuntu2.10
  Architecture: amd64
  CompizPlugins: No value set for 
`/apps/compiz-1/general/screen0/options/active_plugins'
  CompositorRunning: compiz
  CompositorUnredirectDriverBlacklist: '(nouveau|Intel).*Mesa 8.0'
  CompositorUnredirectFSW: true
  Date: Sat Oct 14 16:28:41 2017
  DistUpgraded: Fresh install
  DistroCodename: xenial
  DistroVariant: ubuntu
  DkmsStatus:
   bbswitch, 0.8, 4.10.0-37-generic, x86_64: installed
   nvidia-375, 375.66, 4.10.0-37-generic, x86_64: installed
   nvidia-375, 375.66, 4.4.0-97-generic, x86_64: installed
  ExtraDebuggingInterest: Yes, if not too technical
  GraphicsCard:
   Intel Corporation Device [8086:5912] (rev 04) (prog-if 00 [VGA controller])
 Subsystem: ASUSTeK Computer Inc. Device [1043:1720]
 Subsystem: ASUSTeK Computer Inc. GM108M [GeForce 940MX] [1043:1720]
  InstallationDate: Installed on 2017-10-11 (2 days ago)
  InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 16.04.3 LTS "Xenial Xerus" - Release amd64 
(20170801)
  MachineType: ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC. ZN270IE
  ProcEnviron:
   LANGUAGE=en_SG:en
   PATH=(custom, no user)
   LANG=en_SG.UTF-8
   SHELL=/bin/bash
  ProcKernelCmdLine: BOOT_IMAGE=/boot/vmlinuz-4.10.0-37-generic.efi.signed 
root=UUID=1649139e-3af4-4708-9088-0a8173c9727b ro quiet splash vt.handoff=7
  SourcePackage: xorg
  UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install)
  dmi.bios.date: 02/24/2017
  dmi.bios.vendor: American Megatrends Inc.
  dmi.bios.version: 0401
  dmi.board.asset.tag: Default string
  dmi.board.name: ZN270IE
  dmi.board.vendor: ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC.
  dmi.board.version: Rev 1.xx
  dmi.chassis.asset.tag: No Asset Tag
  dmi.chassis.type: 13
  dmi.chassis.vendor: ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC.
  dmi.chassis.version: 1.0
  dmi.modalias: 
dmi:bvnAmericanMegatrendsInc.:bvr0401:bd02/24/2017:svnASUSTeKCOMPUTERINC.:pnZN270IE:pvr0401:rvnASUSTeKCOMPUTERINC.:rnZN270IE:rvrRev1.xx:cvnASUSTeKCOMPUTERINC.:ct13:cvr1.0:
  dmi.product.name: ZN270IE
  dmi.product.version: 0401
  dmi.sys.vendor: ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC.
  version.compiz: compiz 1:0.9.12.2+16.04.20160823-0ubuntu1
  version.ia32-libs: ia32-libs N/A
  version.libdrm2: libdrm2 2.4.76-1~ubuntu16.04.1
  version.libgl1-mesa-dri: libgl1-mesa-dri 17.0.7-0ubuntu0.16.04.2
  version.libgl1-mesa-dri-experimental: libgl1-mesa-dri-experimental N/A
  version.libgl1-mesa-glx: libgl1-mesa-glx 17.0.7-0ubuntu0.16.04.2
  version.xserver-xorg-core: xserver-xorg-core N/A
  version.xserver-xorg-input-evdev: xserver-xorg-input-evdev N/A
  version.xserver-xorg-video-ati: xserver-xorg-video-ati N/A
  version.xserver-xorg-video-intel: xserver-xorg-video-intel N/A
  version.xserver-xorg-video-nouveau: xserver-xorg-video-nouveau N/A
  xserver.bootTime: Sat Oct 14 15:54:30 2017
  xserver.configfile: default
  xserver.errors:
   
  xserver.logfile: /var/log/Xorg.0.log
  xserver.version: 2:1.19.3-1ubuntu1~16.04.3
  xserver.video_driver: modeset

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+bug/1723585/+subscriptions

-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
Post to : touch-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


[Touch-packages] [Bug 1724505] Re: a

2021-03-25 Thread Daniel van Vugt
Please explain what the problem is or was.

** Package changed: xorg (Ubuntu) => ubuntu

** Changed in: ubuntu
   Status: New => Incomplete

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to xorg in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1724505

Title:
  a

Status in Ubuntu:
  Incomplete

Bug description:
  a

  ProblemType: Bug
  DistroRelease: Ubuntu 16.04
  Package: xorg 1:7.7+13ubuntu3
  ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 4.10.0-37.41~16.04.1-generic 4.10.17
  Uname: Linux 4.10.0-37-generic x86_64
  .tmp.unity_support_test.0:
   
  ApportVersion: 2.20.1-0ubuntu2.10
  Architecture: amd64
  CompizPlugins: No value set for 
`/apps/compiz-1/general/screen0/options/active_plugins'
  CompositorRunning: compiz
  CompositorUnredirectDriverBlacklist: '(nouveau|Intel).*Mesa 8.0'
  CompositorUnredirectFSW: true
  Date: Wed Oct 18 11:21:30 2017
  DistUpgraded: Fresh install
  DistroCodename: xenial
  DistroVariant: ubuntu
  DkmsStatus:
   bbswitch, 0.8, 4.10.0-35-generic, x86_64: installed
   bbswitch, 0.8, 4.10.0-37-generic, x86_64: installed
   nvidia-375, 375.66, 4.10.0-35-generic, x86_64: installed
   nvidia-375, 375.66, 4.10.0-37-generic, x86_64: installed
  ExtraDebuggingInterest: No
  GraphicsCard:
   Intel Corporation Skylake Integrated Graphics [8086:191b] (rev 06) (prog-if 
00 [VGA controller])
 Subsystem: Hewlett-Packard Company Skylake Integrated Graphics [103c:820d]
 Subsystem: Hewlett-Packard Company GM107M [GeForce GTX 950M] [103c:820d]
  InstallationDate: Installed on 2017-09-28 (19 days ago)
  InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 16.04.3 LTS "Xenial Xerus" - Release amd64 
(20170801)
  Lsusb:
   Bus 002 Device 001: ID 1d6b:0003 Linux Foundation 3.0 root hub
   Bus 001 Device 003: ID 8087:0a2a Intel Corp. 
   Bus 001 Device 002: ID 1bcf:2c87 Sunplus Innovation Technology Inc. 
   Bus 001 Device 001: ID 1d6b:0002 Linux Foundation 2.0 root hub
  MachineType: HP HP Pavilion Notebook
  ProcEnviron:
   LANGUAGE=it_IT
   TERM=xterm-256color
   PATH=(custom, no user)
   LANG=it_IT.UTF-8
   SHELL=/bin/bash
  ProcKernelCmdLine: BOOT_IMAGE=/boot/vmlinuz-4.10.0-37-generic.efi.signed 
root=UUID=704cd37e-ef78-4fb2-9d03-602b1fe1e1e4 ro quiet splash vt.handoff=7
  SourcePackage: xorg
  UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install)
  dmi.bios.date: 05/24/2017
  dmi.bios.vendor: Insyde
  dmi.bios.version: F.38
  dmi.board.asset.tag: Type2 - Board Asset Tag
  dmi.board.name: 820D
  dmi.board.vendor: HP
  dmi.board.version: 82.34
  dmi.chassis.type: 10
  dmi.chassis.vendor: HP
  dmi.chassis.version: Chassis Version
  dmi.modalias: 
dmi:bvnInsyde:bvrF.38:bd05/24/2017:svnHP:pnHPPavilionNotebook:pvrType1ProductConfigId:rvnHP:rn820D:rvr82.34:cvnHP:ct10:cvrChassisVersion:
  dmi.product.name: HP Pavilion Notebook
  dmi.product.version: Type1ProductConfigId
  dmi.sys.vendor: HP
  version.compiz: compiz 1:0.9.12.2+16.04.20160823-0ubuntu1
  version.ia32-libs: ia32-libs N/A
  version.libdrm2: libdrm2 2.4.76-1~ubuntu16.04.1
  version.libgl1-mesa-dri: libgl1-mesa-dri 17.0.7-0ubuntu0.16.04.2
  version.libgl1-mesa-dri-experimental: libgl1-mesa-dri-experimental N/A
  version.libgl1-mesa-glx: libgl1-mesa-glx 17.0.7-0ubuntu0.16.04.2
  version.xserver-xorg-core: xserver-xorg-core N/A
  version.xserver-xorg-input-evdev: xserver-xorg-input-evdev N/A
  version.xserver-xorg-video-ati: xserver-xorg-video-ati N/A
  version.xserver-xorg-video-intel: xserver-xorg-video-intel N/A
  version.xserver-xorg-video-nouveau: xserver-xorg-video-nouveau N/A
  xserver.bootTime: Wed Oct 18 11:17:13 2017
  xserver.configfile: default
  xserver.errors:
   
  xserver.logfile: /var/log/Xorg.0.log
  xserver.version: 2:1.19.3-1ubuntu1~16.04.3
  xserver.video_driver: modeset

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+bug/1724505/+subscriptions

-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
Post to : touch-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


[Touch-packages] [Bug 1725385] Re: one

2021-03-25 Thread Daniel van Vugt
What is the problem you are reporting? Does it still happen?

** Package changed: xorg (Ubuntu) => ubuntu

** Changed in: ubuntu
   Status: New => Incomplete

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to xorg in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1725385

Title:
  one

Status in Ubuntu:
  Incomplete

Bug description:
  no further information

  ProblemType: Bug
  DistroRelease: Ubuntu 16.04
  Package: xorg 1:7.7+13ubuntu3
  ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 4.4.0-98.121-generic 4.4.90
  Uname: Linux 4.4.0-98-generic i686
  NonfreeKernelModules: wl
  .tmp.unity_support_test.0:
   
  ApportVersion: 2.20.1-0ubuntu2.10
  Architecture: i386
  CompizPlugins: No value set for 
`/apps/compiz-1/general/screen0/options/active_plugins'
  CompositorRunning: compiz
  CompositorUnredirectDriverBlacklist: '(nouveau|Intel).*Mesa 8.0'
  CompositorUnredirectFSW: true
  Date: Fri Oct 20 18:21:34 2017
  DistUpgraded: 2017-10-13 20:50:46,659 DEBUG icon theme changed, re-reading
  DistroCodename: xenial
  DistroVariant: ubuntu
  DkmsStatus:
   bcmwl, 6.30.223.271+bdcom, 4.4.0-31-generic, i686: installed
   bcmwl, 6.30.223.271+bdcom, 4.4.0-97-generic, i686: installed
   bcmwl, 6.30.223.271+bdcom, 4.4.0-98-generic, i686: installed
   ndiswrapper, 1.60, 4.4.0-97-generic, i686: installed
   ndiswrapper, 1.60, 4.4.0-98-generic, i686: installed
  ExtraDebuggingInterest: Yes, if not too technical
  GraphicsCard:
   Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. [AMD/ATI] RV620/M82 [Mobility Radeon HD 
3450/3470] [1002:95c4] (prog-if 00 [VGA controller])
 Subsystem: Dell RV620/M82 [Mobility Radeon HD 3450/3470] [1028:0254]
  InstallationDate: Installed on 2017-10-13 (7 days ago)
  InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 14.04.5 LTS "Trusty Tahr" - Release i386 (20160803)
  MachineType: Dell Inc. Studio 1535
  ProcEnviron:
   LANGUAGE=en_GB:en
   PATH=(custom, no user)
   LANG=en_GB.UTF-8
   SHELL=/bin/bash
  ProcKernelCmdLine: BOOT_IMAGE=/boot/vmlinuz-4.4.0-98-generic 
root=UUID=18271d74-75ec-4847-a14e-5541b0a44390 ro quiet splash vt.handoff=7
  SourcePackage: xorg
  UpgradeStatus: Upgraded to xenial on 2017-10-13 (6 days ago)
  XorgLogOld:
   
  dmi.bios.date: 07/02/2008
  dmi.bios.vendor: Dell Inc.
  dmi.bios.version: A03
  dmi.board.name: 0F700C
  dmi.board.vendor: Dell Inc.
  dmi.chassis.type: 8
  dmi.chassis.vendor: Dell Inc.
  dmi.modalias: 
dmi:bvnDellInc.:bvrA03:bd07/02/2008:svnDellInc.:pnStudio1535:pvr:rvnDellInc.:rn0F700C:rvr:cvnDellInc.:ct8:cvr:
  dmi.product.name: Studio 1535
  dmi.sys.vendor: Dell Inc.
  version.compiz: compiz 1:0.9.12.2+16.04.20160823-0ubuntu1
  version.libdrm2: libdrm2 2.4.76-1~ubuntu16.04.1
  version.libgl1-mesa-dri: libgl1-mesa-dri 17.0.7-0ubuntu0.16.04.2
  version.libgl1-mesa-dri-experimental: libgl1-mesa-dri-experimental N/A
  version.libgl1-mesa-glx: libgl1-mesa-glx 17.0.7-0ubuntu0.16.04.2
  version.xserver-xorg-core: xserver-xorg-core 2:1.18.4-0ubuntu0.7
  version.xserver-xorg-input-evdev: xserver-xorg-input-evdev 1:2.10.1-1ubuntu2
  version.xserver-xorg-video-ati: xserver-xorg-video-ati 1:7.7.0-1
  version.xserver-xorg-video-intel: xserver-xorg-video-intel 
2:2.99.917+git20160325-1ubuntu1.2
  version.xserver-xorg-video-nouveau: xserver-xorg-video-nouveau 
1:1.0.12-1build2

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+bug/1725385/+subscriptions

-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
Post to : touch-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


[Touch-packages] [Bug 1735945] Re: Brightness control not working

2021-03-25 Thread Daniel van Vugt
Are you still experiencing this bug in newer Ubuntu releases?

** Package changed: xorg (Ubuntu) => linux (Ubuntu)

** Changed in: linux (Ubuntu)
   Status: New => Incomplete

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to xorg in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1735945

Title:
  Brightness control not working

Status in linux package in Ubuntu:
  Incomplete

Bug description:
  Brightness control not working

  ProblemType: Bug
  DistroRelease: Ubuntu 16.04
  Package: xorg 1:7.7+13ubuntu3
  ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 4.10.0-40.44~16.04.1-generic 4.10.17
  Uname: Linux 4.10.0-40-generic x86_64
  .tmp.unity_support_test.0:
   
  ApportVersion: 2.20.1-0ubuntu2.13
  Architecture: amd64
  CompizPlugins: No value set for 
`/apps/compiz-1/general/screen0/options/active_plugins'
  CompositorRunning: compiz
  CompositorUnredirectDriverBlacklist: '(nouveau|Intel).*Mesa 8.0'
  CompositorUnredirectFSW: true
  CurrentDesktop: Unity
  Date: Sat Dec  2 17:53:21 2017
  DistUpgraded: Fresh install
  DistroCodename: xenial
  DistroVariant: ubuntu
  ExtraDebuggingInterest: Yes, if not too technical
  GraphicsCard:
   Intel Corporation 3rd Gen Core processor Graphics Controller [8086:0166] 
(rev 09) (prog-if 00 [VGA controller])
 Subsystem: Lenovo 3rd Gen Core processor Graphics Controller [17aa:3904]
  InstallationDate: Installed on 2017-11-30 (1 days ago)
  InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 16.04.3 LTS "Xenial Xerus" - Release amd64 
(20170801)
  MachineType: LENOVO 20211
  ProcKernelCmdLine: BOOT_IMAGE=/boot/vmlinuz-4.10.0-40-generic.efi.signed 
root=UUID=101a39ce-07bc-4b02-87e9-77428c23bae1 ro quiet splash 
acpi_backlight=vendor vt.handoff=7
  SourcePackage: xorg
  UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install)
  dmi.bios.date: 05/10/2013
  dmi.bios.vendor: LENOVO
  dmi.bios.version: 71CN45WW(V1.18)
  dmi.board.asset.tag: No Asset Tag
  dmi.board.name: INVALID
  dmi.board.vendor: LENOVO
  dmi.board.version: 3193WIN8 STD MLT
  dmi.chassis.asset.tag: No Asset Tag
  dmi.chassis.type: 10
  dmi.chassis.vendor: LENOVO
  dmi.chassis.version: Lenovo IdeaPad P400 Touch
  dmi.modalias: 
dmi:bvnLENOVO:bvr71CN45WW(V1.18):bd05/10/2013:svnLENOVO:pn20211:pvrLenovoIdeaPadP400Touch:rvnLENOVO:rnINVALID:rvr3193WIN8STDMLT:cvnLENOVO:ct10:cvrLenovoIdeaPadP400Touch:
  dmi.product.name: 20211
  dmi.product.version: Lenovo IdeaPad P400 Touch
  dmi.sys.vendor: LENOVO
  version.compiz: compiz 1:0.9.12.2+16.04.20160823-0ubuntu1
  version.ia32-libs: ia32-libs N/A
  version.libdrm2: libdrm2 2.4.76-1~ubuntu16.04.1
  version.libgl1-mesa-dri: libgl1-mesa-dri 17.0.7-0ubuntu0.16.04.2
  version.libgl1-mesa-dri-experimental: libgl1-mesa-dri-experimental N/A
  version.libgl1-mesa-glx: libgl1-mesa-glx 17.0.7-0ubuntu0.16.04.2
  version.xserver-xorg-core: xserver-xorg-core N/A
  version.xserver-xorg-input-evdev: xserver-xorg-input-evdev N/A
  version.xserver-xorg-video-ati: xserver-xorg-video-ati N/A
  version.xserver-xorg-video-intel: xserver-xorg-video-intel N/A
  version.xserver-xorg-video-nouveau: xserver-xorg-video-nouveau N/A
  xserver.bootTime: Sat Dec  2 16:42:49 2017
  xserver.configfile: default
  xserver.errors: intel(0): Unrecognised backlight control interface 'ideapad'
  xserver.logfile: /var/log/Xorg.0.log
  xserver.outputs:
   product id8254 
   vendor AUO
  xserver.version: 2:1.19.3-1ubuntu1~16.04.4

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1735945/+subscriptions

-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
Post to : touch-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


[Touch-packages] [Bug 1739510] Re: ill install you signature

2021-03-25 Thread Daniel van Vugt
Please explain in more detail what kind of problem you are experiencing,
and if it is still happening.

** Changed in: xorg (Ubuntu)
   Status: New => Incomplete

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to xorg in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1739510

Title:
  ill install you signature

Status in xorg package in Ubuntu:
  Incomplete

Bug description:
  hope you can help me. i cant affort another computer
  and spain is acting violence

  ProblemType: Bug
  DistroRelease: Ubuntu 16.04
  Package: xorg 1:7.7+13ubuntu3
  ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 4.10.0-42.46~16.04.1-generic 4.10.17
  Uname: Linux 4.10.0-42-generic x86_64
  .tmp.unity_support_test.0:
   
  ApportVersion: 2.20.1-0ubuntu2.14
  Architecture: amd64
  CompizPlugins: No value set for 
`/apps/compiz-1/general/screen0/options/active_plugins'
  CompositorRunning: compiz
  CompositorUnredirectDriverBlacklist: '(nouveau|Intel).*Mesa 8.0'
  CompositorUnredirectFSW: true
  Date: Thu Dec 21 01:27:15 2017
  DistUpgraded: Fresh install
  DistroCodename: xenial
  DistroVariant: ubuntu
  ExtraDebuggingInterest: Yes
  GraphicsCard:
   Intel Corporation Device [8086:5916] (rev 02) (prog-if 00 [VGA controller])
 Subsystem: Hewlett-Packard Company Device [103c:81ed]
  InstallationDate: Installed on 2017-12-19 (1 days ago)
  InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 16.04.3 LTS "Xenial Xerus" - Release amd64 
(20170801)
  Lsusb:
   Bus 002 Device 001: ID 1d6b:0003 Linux Foundation 3.0 root hub
   Bus 001 Device 004: ID 0c45:651b Microdia 
   Bus 001 Device 003: ID 8087:0aa7 Intel Corp. 
   Bus 001 Device 002: ID 276d:1160  
   Bus 001 Device 001: ID 1d6b:0002 Linux Foundation 2.0 root hub
  MachineType: HP HP 250 G5 Notebook PC
  ProcKernelCmdLine: BOOT_IMAGE=/boot/vmlinuz-4.10.0-42-generic.efi.signed 
root=UUID=d6ad60b5-3719-45b3-8b42-1bb91b324af7 ro nopat vesafb.invalid=1 
plymouth:debug drm.debug=0xe
  SourcePackage: xorg
  UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install)
  dmi.bios.date: 01/20/2017
  dmi.bios.vendor: Insyde
  dmi.bios.version: F.24
  dmi.board.asset.tag: Type2 - Board Asset Tag
  dmi.board.name: 81ED
  dmi.board.vendor: HP
  dmi.board.version: 62.39
  dmi.chassis.type: 10
  dmi.chassis.vendor: HP
  dmi.chassis.version: Chassis Version
  dmi.modalias: 
dmi:bvnInsyde:bvrF.24:bd01/20/2017:svnHP:pnHP250G5NotebookPC:pvrType1ProductConfigId:rvnHP:rn81ED:rvr62.39:cvnHP:ct10:cvrChassisVersion:
  dmi.product.name: HP 250 G5 Notebook PC
  dmi.product.version: Type1ProductConfigId
  dmi.sys.vendor: HP
  version.compiz: compiz 1:0.9.12.2+16.04.20160823-0ubuntu1
  version.ia32-libs: ia32-libs N/A
  version.libdrm2: libdrm2 2.4.76-1~ubuntu16.04.1
  version.libgl1-mesa-dri: libgl1-mesa-dri 17.0.7-0ubuntu0.16.04.2
  version.libgl1-mesa-dri-experimental: libgl1-mesa-dri-experimental N/A
  version.libgl1-mesa-glx: libgl1-mesa-glx 17.0.7-0ubuntu0.16.04.2
  version.xserver-xorg-core: xserver-xorg-core N/A
  version.xserver-xorg-input-evdev: xserver-xorg-input-evdev N/A
  version.xserver-xorg-video-ati: xserver-xorg-video-ati N/A
  version.xserver-xorg-video-intel: xserver-xorg-video-intel N/A
  version.xserver-xorg-video-nouveau: xserver-xorg-video-nouveau N/A
  xserver.bootTime: Thu Dec 21 00:06:27 2017
  xserver.configfile: default
  xserver.errors:
   
  xserver.logfile: /var/log/Xorg.0.log
  xserver.version: 2:1.19.3-1ubuntu1~16.04.4
  xserver.video_driver: modeset

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/xorg/+bug/1739510/+subscriptions

-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
Post to : touch-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


[Touch-packages] [Bug 1740379] Re: vlc et rhymtbox

2021-03-25 Thread Daniel van Vugt
Sorry for the lateness, but is this bug still occurring?

** Package changed: xorg (Ubuntu) => vlc (Ubuntu)

** Changed in: vlc (Ubuntu)
   Status: New => Incomplete

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to xorg in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1740379

Title:
  vlc et rhymtbox

Status in vlc package in Ubuntu:
  Incomplete

Bug description:
  ces programme  refuse de s'ouvrir

  ProblemType: Bug
  DistroRelease: Ubuntu 16.04
  Package: xorg 1:7.7+13ubuntu3
  ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 4.4.0-104.127-generic 4.4.98
  Uname: Linux 4.4.0-104-generic x86_64
  .tmp.unity_support_test.0:
   
  ApportVersion: 2.20.1-0ubuntu2.14
  Architecture: amd64
  BootLog:
   
  CompizPlugins: No value set for 
`/apps/compiz-1/general/screen0/options/active_plugins'
  CompositorRunning: None
  Date: Thu Dec 28 10:30:20 2017
  DistUpgraded: Fresh install
  DistroCodename: xenial
  DistroVariant: ubuntu
  DkmsStatus:
   bbswitch, 0.8, 4.4.0-103-generic, x86_64: installed
   bbswitch, 0.8, 4.4.0-104-generic, x86_64: installed
  GraphicsCard:
   NVIDIA Corporation GF116 [GeForce GTS 450 Rev. 2] [10de:1245] (rev a1) 
(prog-if 00 [VGA controller])
 Subsystem: NVIDIA Corporation GF116 [GeForce GTS 450 Rev. 2] [10de:0939]
  InstallationDate: Installed on 2017-10-06 (82 days ago)
  InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 16.04 LTS "Xenial Xerus" - Release amd64 
(20160420.1)
  MachineType: ECS A880GM-AD3
  ProcKernelCmdLine: BOOT_IMAGE=/boot/vmlinuz-4.4.0-104-generic 
root=UUID=b7fa625d-3fd0-4d1d-99d6-d3637b092b50 ro drm.debug=0xe plymouth:debug
  SourcePackage: xorg
  UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install)
  dmi.bios.date: 06/11/2010
  dmi.bios.vendor: American Megatrends Inc.
  dmi.bios.version: 080015
  dmi.board.name: A880GM-AD3
  dmi.board.vendor: ECS
  dmi.board.version: 1.0
  dmi.chassis.type: 3
  dmi.chassis.vendor: ECS
  dmi.modalias: 
dmi:bvnAmericanMegatrendsInc.:bvr080015:bd06/11/2010:svnECS:pnA880GM-AD3:pvr1.0:rvnECS:rnA880GM-AD3:rvr1.0:cvnECS:ct3:cvr:
  dmi.product.name: A880GM-AD3
  dmi.product.version: 1.0
  dmi.sys.vendor: ECS
  version.compiz: compiz 1:0.9.12.2+16.04.20160823-0ubuntu1
  version.ia32-libs: ia32-libs N/A
  version.libdrm2: libdrm2 2.4.83-1~16.04.1
  version.libgl1-mesa-dri: libgl1-mesa-dri 17.0.7-0ubuntu0.16.04.2
  version.libgl1-mesa-dri-experimental: libgl1-mesa-dri-experimental N/A
  version.libgl1-mesa-glx: libgl1-mesa-glx 17.0.7-0ubuntu0.16.04.2
  version.xserver-xorg-core: xserver-xorg-core 2:1.18.4-0ubuntu0.7
  version.xserver-xorg-input-evdev: xserver-xorg-input-evdev 1:2.10.1-1ubuntu2
  version.xserver-xorg-video-ati: xserver-xorg-video-ati 1:7.7.0-1
  version.xserver-xorg-video-intel: xserver-xorg-video-intel 
2:2.99.917+git20160325-1ubuntu1.2
  version.xserver-xorg-video-nouveau: xserver-xorg-video-nouveau 
1:1.0.12-1build2
  xserver.bootTime: Thu Dec 28 10:25:38 2017
  xserver.configfile: default
  xserver.devices:
   inputPower Button KEYBOARD, id 6
   inputPower Button KEYBOARD, id 7
   inputMicrosoft Wired Keyboard 400 KEYBOARD, id 8
   inputLogitech USB Receiver MOUSE, id 9
   inputLogitech USB Receiver KEYBOARD, id 10
  xserver.errors:
   Failed to load module "nvidia" (module does not exist, 0)
   Failed to load module "nvidia" (module does not exist, 0)
  xserver.logfile: /var/log/Xorg.0.log
  xserver.version: 2:1.18.4-0ubuntu0.7
  xserver.video_driver: nouveau

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/vlc/+bug/1740379/+subscriptions

-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
Post to : touch-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


[Touch-packages] [Bug 1871268] Re: Installation fails due to useless immediate configuration error when "Install Third-Party Drivers" is selected

2021-03-25 Thread Mathew Hodson
** Tags removed: verification-needed

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to apt in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1871268

Title:
  Installation fails due to useless immediate configuration error when
  "Install Third-Party Drivers" is selected

Status in Ubuntu CD Images:
  Fix Released
Status in apt package in Ubuntu:
  Fix Released
Status in apt source package in Bionic:
  Fix Committed
Status in apt source package in Focal:
  Fix Released
Status in apt source package in Groovy:
  Fix Released
Status in apt package in Debian:
  Fix Released

Bug description:
  [Impact]
  Installations that really succeeded would then fail because APT could not 
immediately configure a package. Which is a pointless way to fail at that 
point, because everything did work out anyway.

  We have two changes that help address this:

  * The first one stops immediately configuring multi-arch siblings
  (e.g. libc6:i386 when it's configuring libc6:amd64). This was not
  necessary, and caused all the libc6:i386 failures here.

  * The second change sort of also supersedes the first one: It just
  ignores any errors from immediate configuration, relying on the fact
  that it's checked and rectified at a later point if there are
  unconfigured packages (which is what made all those failures happen
  spuriously after having successfully installed everything).

  [Test case]
  We have one test case in EIPP format in the Debian bug 973305 which was only 
helped by the second change, not the first one. Run /usr/lib/apt/planners < 
eipp.log and check there are no errors.

  TODO: It's unclear if the APT from proposed installed in the live
  session will fix the installer, needs investigation, but would make a
  useful test case.

  [Regression potential]
  It's imaginable that we missed something somewhere and some path that checked 
for a set error doesn't check it anymore, and we report success when we hit an 
error, but it seems unlikely.

  Behavior of --simulate changes. This used to fail before as well, and
  will now only produce a warning. We don't believe that is a reason of
  concern.

  [Groovy SRU]
  The groovy SRU is a sync of the 2.1.11 micro release from Debian unstable 
which also incorporates changes to the documentation: A typo fix, replacing 
focal with groovy in examples, and minor Dutch manual pages translation updates.

  We do not have test cases for the documentation changes, and we do not
  consider there to be a huge regression potential. As long as they
  build, they should be readable - maybe some words are wrong in the
  translation, who knows.

  [Original bug report]
  Test Case
  1. Install Ubuntu Desktop on hardware with an nVidia card and select to 
install 3rd party drivers
  2. Proceed with installation

  The following error message is displayed in /var/log/syslog
  /plugininstall.py: Verifying downloads ...
  /plugininstall.py: Failed to find package object for 
/cdrom//pool/main/g/gcc-defaults/gcc_9.3.0-1ubuntu2_amd64.deb: "Version: 
'9.3.0-1ubuntu2' not found."
  /plugininstall.py: Failed to find package object for 
/cdrom//pool/main/libx/libxcrypt/libcrypt-dev_4.4.10-10ubuntu4_amd64.deb: 
"Version: '4.4.10-10ubuntu4' not found."
  /plugininstall.py: Failed to find package object for 
/cdrom//pool/main/g/gcc-defaults/g++_9.3.0-1ubuntu2_amd64.deb: "Version: 
'9.3.0-1ubuntu2' not found."
  /plugininstall.py: Failed to find package object for 
/cdrom//pool/main/z/zlib/zlib1g_1.2.11.dfsg-2ubuntu1_i386.deb: "Version: 
'1.2.11.dfsg-2ubuntu1' not found."
  /plugininstall.py: Failed to find package object for 
/cdrom//pool/main/libx/libxau/libxau6_1.0.9-0ubuntu1_i386.deb: "Version: 
'1.0.9-0ubuntu1' not found."
  /plugininstall.py: Failed to find package object for 
/cdrom//pool/main/libx/libxdmcp/libxdmcp6_1.1.3-0ubuntu1_i386.deb: "Version: 
'1.1.3-0ubuntu1' not found."
  /plugininstall.py: Failed to find package object for 
/cdrom//pool/main/libx/libx11/libx11-6_1.6.9-2ubuntu1_i386.deb: "Version: 
'1.6.9-2ubuntu1' not found."
  /plugininstall.py: Failed to find package object for 
/cdrom//pool/main/libx/libxext/libxext6_1.3.4-0ubuntu1_i386.deb: "Version: 
'1.3.4-0ubuntu1' not found."
  /plugininstall.py: Failed to find package object for 
/cdrom//pool/main/l/lm-sensors/libsensors5_3.6.0-2ubuntu1_i386.deb: "Version: 
'3.6.0-2ubuntu1' not found."
  /plugininstall.py: Failed to find package object for 
/cdrom//pool/main/libx/libx11/libx11-xcb1_1.6.9-2ubuntu1_i386.deb: "Version: 
'1.6.9-2ubuntu1' not found."
  /plugininstall.py: Failed to find package object for 
/cdrom//pool/main/libx/libxdamage/libxdamage1_1.1.5-1_i386.deb: "Version: 
'1.1.5-1' not found."
  /plugininstall.py: Failed to find package object for 
/cdrom//pool/main/libx/libxfixes/libxfixes3_5.0.3-1_i386.deb: "Version: 
'5.0.3-1' not found."
  /plugininstall.py: Failed to find package object for 

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1693900] Re: apt-get update should return exit code != 0 on error

2021-03-25 Thread Mathew Hodson
Fixed in Ubuntu Hirsute.

---
apt (2.1.16) unstable; urgency=medium

  [ Faidon Liambotis ]
  * Various fixes to http and connect method
- basehttp: also consider Access when a Server's URI
- connect: convert a C-style string to std::string
- connect: use ServiceNameOrPort, not Port, as the cache key

  [ Julian Andres Klode ]
  * patterns: Add dependency patterns ?depends, ?conflicts, etc.
Note that the -broken- variants are not implemented yet.
  * Rewrite of the kernel autoremoval code:
- Determine autoremovable kernels at run-time (LP: #1615381), this fixes the
  issue where apt could consider a running kernel autoremovable
- Automatically remove unused kernels on apt {full,dist}-upgrade.
  This helps ensuring that we don't run out of /boot space.
- Only keep up to 3 (not 4) kernels.
  Ubuntu boot partitions were sized for 3 kernels, not 4.
  * Bump codenames to bullseye/hirsute and adjust -security codename for
bullseye (Closes: #969932)
  * Ignore failures from immediate configuration. This does not change the
actual installation ordering - we never passed the return code to the
caller and installation went underway anyway if it could be ordered at a
later stage, this just removes spurious after-the-fact errors.
(Closes: #973305, #188161, #211075, #649588) (LP: #1871268)
  * Add support for Phased-Update-Percentage, previously used only by
update-manager.
  * Implement update --error-on=any so that scripts can reliably check for
transient failures as well. (Closes: #594813)

  [ Demi M. Obenour ]
  * test/integration/framework: Be compatible with Bash

  [ Vangelis Skarmoutsos ]
  * Greek program translation update

 -- Julian Andres Klode   Fri, 08 Jan 2021 21:49:15
+0100

** Bug watch removed: Debian Bug tracker #776152
   https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=776152

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to apt in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1693900

Title:
  apt-get update should return exit code != 0 on error

Status in apt package in Ubuntu:
  Fix Released
Status in apt source package in Xenial:
  Confirmed
Status in apt source package in Bionic:
  Fix Committed
Status in apt source package in Focal:
  Fix Committed
Status in apt source package in Groovy:
  Fix Committed
Status in apt package in Debian:
  Unknown

Bug description:
  [Impact]
  There is no way for scripts to run apt update and be sure that it was 
entirely successful.

  We introduce a new flag, --error-on=any that makes apt update also
  error out on transient errors.

  [Test plan]
  We have included a test in the test-suite in 
test-apt-update-failure-propagation that ensures that warnings become errors.

  [Where problems could occur]
  If there's an issue some warnings for transient errors could become errors, 
or worse I suppose it's possible but unlikely for errors to be reported as 
warnings...

  Since the new behavior is behind a flag, regression potential for
  existing scripts is low if there is no bug.

  [Original bug report]

  When running 'apt-get update' (e.g. on a container install post-
  install script), apt-get return with exit code 0, even so it wasn't
  able to "update" properly. E.g.:

  + apt-get update
  Err:1 http://de.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu xenial InRelease
    Temporary failure resolving 'de.archive.ubuntu.com'
  Err:2 http://security.ubuntu.com/ubuntu xenial-security InRelease
    Temporary failure resolving 'security.ubuntu.com'
  Err:3 http://de.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu xenial-updates InRelease
    Temporary failure resolving 'de.archive.ubuntu.com'
  Reading package lists... Done
  W: Failed to fetch http://de.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/dists/xenial/InRelease 
 Temporary failure resolving 'de.archive.ubuntu.com'
  W: Failed to fetch 
http://de.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/dists/xenial-updates/InRelease  Temporary 
failure resolving 'de.archive.ubuntu.com'
  W: Failed to fetch 
http://security.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/dists/xenial-security/InRelease  Temporary 
failure resolving 'security.ubuntu.com'
  W: Some index files failed to download. They have been ignored, or old ones 
used instead.

  It should be corrected to return useful exit code, so that scripts can
  take the appropriate actions ...

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/apt/+bug/1693900/+subscriptions

-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
Post to : touch-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


[Touch-packages] [Bug 1742695] Re: apt-get update silently fails fetching security updates

2021-03-25 Thread Mathew Hodson
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 1693900 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1693900

** Also affects: apt (Debian) via
   https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=776152
   Importance: Unknown
   Status: Unknown

** No longer affects: apt (Debian)

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to apt in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1742695

Title:
  apt-get update silently fails fetching security updates

Status in apt package in Ubuntu:
  Triaged

Bug description:
  On Ubuntu Xenial, apt-get fails silently when security update server
  cannot be reached. This state could be detected by scanning the apt-
  get output afterwards. But manually adding workarounds to each apt-get
  invocation in production automation is prone to error, thus leaving
  machines without security updates.

  Expected behaviour (e.g.):
  * 0 - all OK
  * 1 - temporary failure (e.g. network)
  * 2 - permanent failure

  
  Test:
  * Change your update server IP in /etc/hosts to something unreachable
  * Run apt-get update (might take a while)
  * Check exit status

  
  $ lsb_release -r -d
  Description:Ubuntu 16.04.3 LTS
  Release:16.04
  rfiedler@n3ahit1403:~$ 

  ii  apt 1.2.24
  amd64commandline package manager

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/apt/+bug/1742695/+subscriptions

-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
Post to : touch-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


[Touch-packages] [Bug 626144] Re: aptdaemon doesn't respond to network errors correctly

2021-03-25 Thread Mathew Hodson
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 1693900 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1693900

** This bug is no longer a duplicate of bug 451366
   404 from the archive is not handled well
** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 1693900
   apt-get update should return exit code != 0 on error

** Package changed: debian => apt (Ubuntu)

** Changed in: apt (Ubuntu)
   Importance: Unknown => Undecided

** Changed in: apt (Ubuntu)
 Remote watch: Debian Bug tracker #594813 => None

** Bug watch removed: Debian Bug tracker #594813
   https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=594813

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to apt in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/626144

Title:
  aptdaemon doesn't respond to network errors correctly

Status in Aptdaemon:
  New
Status in apt package in Ubuntu:
  New

Bug description:
  (A script is attached to demonstrate the behavior)

  1) Go to NetworkManager and disconnect from your network
  2) Run the script attached

  What happens - The update starts, continues for a few seconds and then 
finishes with the state "exit-sucess"
  What should happen - The update starts, fails and raises an error because it 
can't connect to the internet.

  1) Make sure you are connected to the Internet
  2) Run the script attached
  3) After a few seconds, go to NetworkManager and disconnect yourself from the 
internet

  What happens - The update starts and just hangs
  What should happen - The update starts and then fails (raising an error) 
because it can no longer connect to the internet.


  Such behavior is essential for applications like software-updater and
  the way it works at the moment seems counter-intuitive.

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/aptdaemon/+bug/626144/+subscriptions

-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
Post to : touch-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


[Touch-packages] [Bug 1693900] Re: apt-get update should return exit code != 0 on error

2021-03-25 Thread Mathew Hodson
** Bug watch removed: github.com/moby/moby/issues #23910
   https://github.com/moby/moby/issues/23910

** Bug watch removed: github.com/moby/libnetwork/issues #1654
   https://github.com/moby/libnetwork/issues/1654

** Changed in: apt (Ubuntu Xenial)
   Importance: Undecided => Wishlist

** Changed in: apt (Ubuntu Bionic)
   Importance: Undecided => Wishlist

** Changed in: apt (Ubuntu Focal)
   Importance: Undecided => Wishlist

** Changed in: apt (Ubuntu Groovy)
   Importance: Undecided => Wishlist

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to apt in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1693900

Title:
  apt-get update should return exit code != 0 on error

Status in apt package in Ubuntu:
  Fix Released
Status in apt source package in Xenial:
  Confirmed
Status in apt source package in Bionic:
  Fix Committed
Status in apt source package in Focal:
  Fix Committed
Status in apt source package in Groovy:
  Fix Committed
Status in apt package in Debian:
  Unknown

Bug description:
  [Impact]
  There is no way for scripts to run apt update and be sure that it was 
entirely successful.

  We introduce a new flag, --error-on=any that makes apt update also
  error out on transient errors.

  [Test plan]
  We have included a test in the test-suite in 
test-apt-update-failure-propagation that ensures that warnings become errors.

  [Where problems could occur]
  If there's an issue some warnings for transient errors could become errors, 
or worse I suppose it's possible but unlikely for errors to be reported as 
warnings...

  Since the new behavior is behind a flag, regression potential for
  existing scripts is low if there is no bug.

  [Original bug report]

  When running 'apt-get update' (e.g. on a container install post-
  install script), apt-get return with exit code 0, even so it wasn't
  able to "update" properly. E.g.:

  + apt-get update
  Err:1 http://de.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu xenial InRelease
    Temporary failure resolving 'de.archive.ubuntu.com'
  Err:2 http://security.ubuntu.com/ubuntu xenial-security InRelease
    Temporary failure resolving 'security.ubuntu.com'
  Err:3 http://de.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu xenial-updates InRelease
    Temporary failure resolving 'de.archive.ubuntu.com'
  Reading package lists... Done
  W: Failed to fetch http://de.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/dists/xenial/InRelease 
 Temporary failure resolving 'de.archive.ubuntu.com'
  W: Failed to fetch 
http://de.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/dists/xenial-updates/InRelease  Temporary 
failure resolving 'de.archive.ubuntu.com'
  W: Failed to fetch 
http://security.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/dists/xenial-security/InRelease  Temporary 
failure resolving 'security.ubuntu.com'
  W: Some index files failed to download. They have been ignored, or old ones 
used instead.

  It should be corrected to return useful exit code, so that scripts can
  take the appropriate actions ...

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/apt/+bug/1693900/+subscriptions

-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
Post to : touch-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


[Touch-packages] [Bug 451366] Re: 404 from the archive is not handled well

2021-03-25 Thread Mathew Hodson
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 1693900 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1693900

** Package changed: aptdaemon (Debian) => apt (Ubuntu)

** Changed in: apt (Ubuntu)
   Importance: Unknown => Undecided

** Changed in: apt (Ubuntu)
   Status: Fix Released => New

** Changed in: apt (Ubuntu)
 Remote watch: Debian Bug tracker #594813 => None

** Bug watch removed: Debian Bug tracker #594813
   https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=594813

** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 1693900
   apt-get update should return exit code != 0 on error

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to apt in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/451366

Title:
  404 from the archive is not handled well

Status in Aptdaemon:
  In Progress
Status in apt package in Ubuntu:
  New
Status in aptdaemon package in Ubuntu:
  Triaged
Status in software-center package in Ubuntu:
  Triaged

Bug description:
  Binary package hint: software-center

  When trying to install Pingus from the Ubuntu Software Center It
  downloads to 50% and then gives the following error message:

  Failed to download package files
  Check your internet connection.
  Details
  Failed to fetch 
http://us.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/pool/main/b/boost1.38/libboost-signals1.38.0_1.38.0-6ubuntu5_i386.deb
 404  Not Found [IP: 91.189.88.31 80]


  My internet is working and I have downloaded and installed other
  software succesfully from the software center.

  ProblemType: Bug
  Architecture: i386
  Date: Wed Oct 14 08:20:35 2009
  DistroRelease: Ubuntu 9.10
  Package: software-center 0.4.6
  PackageArchitecture: all
  ProcEnviron:
   LANG=en_US.UTF-8
   SHELL=/bin/bash
  ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 2.6.31-12.39-generic
  SourcePackage: software-center
  Tags:  ubuntu-unr
  Uname: Linux 2.6.31-12-generic i686

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/aptdaemon/+bug/451366/+subscriptions

-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
Post to : touch-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


[Touch-packages] [Bug 1693900] Re: apt-get update should return exit code != 0 on error

2021-03-25 Thread Launchpad Bug Tracker
Status changed to 'Confirmed' because the bug affects multiple users.

** Changed in: apt (Ubuntu Xenial)
   Status: New => Confirmed

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to apt in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1693900

Title:
  apt-get update should return exit code != 0 on error

Status in apt package in Ubuntu:
  Fix Released
Status in apt source package in Xenial:
  Confirmed
Status in apt source package in Bionic:
  Fix Committed
Status in apt source package in Focal:
  Fix Committed
Status in apt source package in Groovy:
  Fix Committed
Status in apt package in Debian:
  Unknown

Bug description:
  [Impact]
  There is no way for scripts to run apt update and be sure that it was 
entirely successful.

  We introduce a new flag, --error-on=any that makes apt update also
  error out on transient errors.

  [Test plan]
  We have included a test in the test-suite in 
test-apt-update-failure-propagation that ensures that warnings become errors.

  [Where problems could occur]
  If there's an issue some warnings for transient errors could become errors, 
or worse I suppose it's possible but unlikely for errors to be reported as 
warnings...

  Since the new behavior is behind a flag, regression potential for
  existing scripts is low if there is no bug.

  [Original bug report]

  When running 'apt-get update' (e.g. on a container install post-
  install script), apt-get return with exit code 0, even so it wasn't
  able to "update" properly. E.g.:

  + apt-get update
  Err:1 http://de.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu xenial InRelease
    Temporary failure resolving 'de.archive.ubuntu.com'
  Err:2 http://security.ubuntu.com/ubuntu xenial-security InRelease
    Temporary failure resolving 'security.ubuntu.com'
  Err:3 http://de.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu xenial-updates InRelease
    Temporary failure resolving 'de.archive.ubuntu.com'
  Reading package lists... Done
  W: Failed to fetch http://de.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/dists/xenial/InRelease 
 Temporary failure resolving 'de.archive.ubuntu.com'
  W: Failed to fetch 
http://de.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/dists/xenial-updates/InRelease  Temporary 
failure resolving 'de.archive.ubuntu.com'
  W: Failed to fetch 
http://security.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/dists/xenial-security/InRelease  Temporary 
failure resolving 'security.ubuntu.com'
  W: Some index files failed to download. They have been ignored, or old ones 
used instead.

  It should be corrected to return useful exit code, so that scripts can
  take the appropriate actions ...

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/apt/+bug/1693900/+subscriptions

-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
Post to : touch-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


[Touch-packages] [Bug 1693900] Re: apt-get update should return exit code != 0 on error

2021-03-25 Thread Mathew Hodson
** Bug watch added: Debian Bug tracker #594813
   https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=594813

** Also affects: apt (Debian) via
   https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=594813
   Importance: Unknown
   Status: Unknown

** Description changed:

  [Impact]
  There is no way for scripts to run apt update and be sure that it was 
entirely successful.
  
- We introduce a new flag, --error-mode=any that makes apt update also
- error out on transient errors.
+ We introduce a new flag, --error-on=any that makes apt update also error
+ out on transient errors.
  
  [Test plan]
  We have included a test in the test-suite in 
test-apt-update-failure-propagation that ensures that warnings become errors.
  
  [Where problems could occur]
  If there's an issue some warnings for transient errors could become errors, 
or worse I suppose it's possible but unlikely for errors to be reported as 
warnings...
  
  Since the new behavior is behind a flag, regression potential for
  existing scripts is low if there is no bug.
  
  [Original bug report]
  
  When running 'apt-get update' (e.g. on a container install post-install
  script), apt-get return with exit code 0, even so it wasn't able to
  "update" properly. E.g.:
  
  + apt-get update
  Err:1 http://de.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu xenial InRelease
    Temporary failure resolving 'de.archive.ubuntu.com'
  Err:2 http://security.ubuntu.com/ubuntu xenial-security InRelease
    Temporary failure resolving 'security.ubuntu.com'
  Err:3 http://de.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu xenial-updates InRelease
    Temporary failure resolving 'de.archive.ubuntu.com'
  Reading package lists... Done
  W: Failed to fetch http://de.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/dists/xenial/InRelease 
 Temporary failure resolving 'de.archive.ubuntu.com'
  W: Failed to fetch 
http://de.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/dists/xenial-updates/InRelease  Temporary 
failure resolving 'de.archive.ubuntu.com'
  W: Failed to fetch 
http://security.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/dists/xenial-security/InRelease  Temporary 
failure resolving 'security.ubuntu.com'
  W: Some index files failed to download. They have been ignored, or old ones 
used instead.
  
  It should be corrected to return useful exit code, so that scripts can
  take the appropriate actions ...

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to apt in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1693900

Title:
  apt-get update should return exit code != 0 on error

Status in apt package in Ubuntu:
  Fix Released
Status in apt source package in Xenial:
  Confirmed
Status in apt source package in Bionic:
  Fix Committed
Status in apt source package in Focal:
  Fix Committed
Status in apt source package in Groovy:
  Fix Committed
Status in apt package in Debian:
  Unknown

Bug description:
  [Impact]
  There is no way for scripts to run apt update and be sure that it was 
entirely successful.

  We introduce a new flag, --error-on=any that makes apt update also
  error out on transient errors.

  [Test plan]
  We have included a test in the test-suite in 
test-apt-update-failure-propagation that ensures that warnings become errors.

  [Where problems could occur]
  If there's an issue some warnings for transient errors could become errors, 
or worse I suppose it's possible but unlikely for errors to be reported as 
warnings...

  Since the new behavior is behind a flag, regression potential for
  existing scripts is low if there is no bug.

  [Original bug report]

  When running 'apt-get update' (e.g. on a container install post-
  install script), apt-get return with exit code 0, even so it wasn't
  able to "update" properly. E.g.:

  + apt-get update
  Err:1 http://de.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu xenial InRelease
    Temporary failure resolving 'de.archive.ubuntu.com'
  Err:2 http://security.ubuntu.com/ubuntu xenial-security InRelease
    Temporary failure resolving 'security.ubuntu.com'
  Err:3 http://de.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu xenial-updates InRelease
    Temporary failure resolving 'de.archive.ubuntu.com'
  Reading package lists... Done
  W: Failed to fetch http://de.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/dists/xenial/InRelease 
 Temporary failure resolving 'de.archive.ubuntu.com'
  W: Failed to fetch 
http://de.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/dists/xenial-updates/InRelease  Temporary 
failure resolving 'de.archive.ubuntu.com'
  W: Failed to fetch 
http://security.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/dists/xenial-security/InRelease  Temporary 
failure resolving 'security.ubuntu.com'
  W: Some index files failed to download. They have been ignored, or old ones 
used instead.

  It should be corrected to return useful exit code, so that scripts can
  take the appropriate actions ...

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/apt/+bug/1693900/+subscriptions

-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
Post to : touch-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : 

[Touch-packages] [Bug 626144] [NEW] aptdaemon doesn't respond to network errors correctly

2021-03-25 Thread Launchpad Bug Tracker
You have been subscribed to a public bug:

(A script is attached to demonstrate the behavior)

1) Go to NetworkManager and disconnect from your network
2) Run the script attached

What happens - The update starts, continues for a few seconds and then finishes 
with the state "exit-sucess"
What should happen - The update starts, fails and raises an error because it 
can't connect to the internet.

1) Make sure you are connected to the Internet
2) Run the script attached
3) After a few seconds, go to NetworkManager and disconnect yourself from the 
internet

What happens - The update starts and just hangs
What should happen - The update starts and then fails (raising an error) 
because it can no longer connect to the internet.


Such behavior is essential for applications like software-updater and
the way it works at the moment seems counter-intuitive.

** Affects: aptdaemon
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New

** Affects: apt (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New

-- 
aptdaemon doesn't respond to network errors correctly
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/626144
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch 
seeded packages, which is subscribed to apt in Ubuntu.

-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
Post to : touch-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


[Touch-packages] [Bug 451366] [NEW] 404 from the archive is not handled well

2021-03-25 Thread Launchpad Bug Tracker
You have been subscribed to a public bug:

Binary package hint: software-center

When trying to install Pingus from the Ubuntu Software Center It
downloads to 50% and then gives the following error message:

Failed to download package files
Check your internet connection.
Details
Failed to fetch 
http://us.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/pool/main/b/boost1.38/libboost-signals1.38.0_1.38.0-6ubuntu5_i386.deb
 404  Not Found [IP: 91.189.88.31 80]


My internet is working and I have downloaded and installed other
software succesfully from the software center.

ProblemType: Bug
Architecture: i386
Date: Wed Oct 14 08:20:35 2009
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 9.10
Package: software-center 0.4.6
PackageArchitecture: all
ProcEnviron:
 LANG=en_US.UTF-8
 SHELL=/bin/bash
ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 2.6.31-12.39-generic
SourcePackage: software-center
Tags:  ubuntu-unr
Uname: Linux 2.6.31-12-generic i686

** Affects: aptdaemon
 Importance: Medium
 Status: In Progress

** Affects: aptdaemon (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Medium
 Status: Triaged

** Affects: software-center (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Medium
 Status: Triaged

** Affects: apt (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New


** Tags: apport-bug client-server i386 ubuntu-unr
-- 
404 from the archive is not handled well
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/451366
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch 
seeded packages, which is subscribed to apt in Ubuntu.

-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
Post to : touch-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


[Touch-packages] [Bug 1921385] Re: Xorg freeze

2021-03-25 Thread Daniel van Vugt
Thanks for the bug report.

I can see some recurring crashes in your 'i915' kernel graphics driver
so will move this bug to the kernel.

Also, Ubuntu 16.04 is 5 years old and not supported as well as newer
releases. We encourage you to install Ubuntu 20.04.2.0 instead:
https://ubuntu.com/download/desktop

** Summary changed:

- Xorg freeze
+ Crashes in i915 on Intel GM965

** Package changed: xorg (Ubuntu) => linux (Ubuntu)

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to xorg in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1921385

Title:
  Crashes in i915 on Intel GM965

Status in linux package in Ubuntu:
  New

Bug description:
  The boot program is very slow.
  An error dialog pops up simply stating there is a problem with the system.
  If I open the details a long long list of data is shown, way above my 
technical knowledge.

  ProblemType: Bug
  DistroRelease: Ubuntu 16.04
  Package: xorg 1:7.7+13ubuntu3.1
  ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 4.15.0-140.144~16.04.1-generic 4.15.18
  Uname: Linux 4.15.0-140-generic i686
  NonfreeKernelModules: wl
  .tmp.unity_support_test.0:
   
  ApportVersion: 2.20.1-0ubuntu2.30
  Architecture: i386
  CompizPlugins: No value set for 
`/apps/compiz-1/general/screen0/options/active_plugins'
  CompositorRunning: compiz
  CompositorUnredirectDriverBlacklist: '(nouveau|Intel).*Mesa 8.0'
  CompositorUnredirectFSW: true
  CurrentDesktop: Unity
  Date: Thu Mar 25 08:22:18 2021
  DistUpgraded: Fresh install
  DistroCodename: xenial
  DistroVariant: ubuntu
  DkmsStatus:
   bcmwl, 6.30.223.271+bdcom, 4.15.0-139-generic, i686: installed
   bcmwl, 6.30.223.271+bdcom, 4.15.0-140-generic, i686: installed
  ExtraDebuggingInterest: Yes, if not too technical
  GraphicsCard:
   Intel Corporation Mobile GM965/GL960 Integrated Graphics Controller 
(primary) [8086:2a02] (rev 0c) (prog-if 00 [VGA controller])
 Subsystem: Dell Inspiron 1525 [1028:022f]
 Subsystem: Dell Inspiron 1525 [1028:022f]
  InstallationDate: Installed on 2021-03-17 (7 days ago)
  InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 16.04.6 LTS "Xenial Xerus" - Release i386 
(20190227.1)
  MachineType: Dell Inc. Inspiron 1525
  ProcEnviron:
   LANGUAGE=en_US
   PATH=(custom, no user)
   XDG_RUNTIME_DIR=
   LANG=en_US.UTF-8
   SHELL=/bin/bash
  ProcKernelCmdLine: BOOT_IMAGE=/boot/vmlinuz-4.15.0-140-generic 
root=UUID=b85df775-5de2-47b0-843b-d2f8b1f71d5e ro quiet splash vt.handoff=7
  SourcePackage: xorg
  Symptom: display
  Title: Xorg freeze
  UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install)
  dmi.bios.date: 10/27/2009
  dmi.bios.vendor: Dell Inc.
  dmi.bios.version: A17
  dmi.board.vendor: Dell Inc.
  dmi.chassis.type: 8
  dmi.chassis.vendor: Dell Inc.
  dmi.modalias: 
dmi:bvnDellInc.:bvrA17:bd10/27/2009:svnDellInc.:pnInspiron1525:pvr:rvnDellInc.:rn:rvr:cvnDellInc.:ct8:cvr:
  dmi.product.name: Inspiron 1525
  dmi.sys.vendor: Dell Inc.
  version.compiz: compiz 1:0.9.12.3+16.04.20180221-0ubuntu1
  version.libdrm2: libdrm2 2.4.91-2~16.04.1
  version.libgl1-mesa-dri: libgl1-mesa-dri 18.0.5-0ubuntu0~16.04.1
  version.libgl1-mesa-dri-experimental: libgl1-mesa-dri-experimental N/A
  version.libgl1-mesa-glx: libgl1-mesa-glx 18.0.5-0ubuntu0~16.04.1
  version.xserver-xorg-core: xserver-xorg-core N/A
  version.xserver-xorg-input-evdev: xserver-xorg-input-evdev N/A
  version.xserver-xorg-video-ati: xserver-xorg-video-ati N/A
  version.xserver-xorg-video-intel: xserver-xorg-video-intel N/A
  version.xserver-xorg-video-nouveau: xserver-xorg-video-nouveau N/A

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1921385/+subscriptions

-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
Post to : touch-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


[Touch-packages] [Bug 1911036] Re: GDK/GTK app crash in XFCE when performing drag operation (in gdk_window_cache_new <- gdk_window_cache_get <- drag_context_find_window_cache <- gdk_x11_drag_context_f

2021-03-25 Thread Daniel van Vugt
Now in hirsute-proposed:

gtk+3.0 (3.24.25-1ubuntu3) hirsute; urgency=medium

  * d/p/x11-dnd-Ignore-XErrors-from-the-COW.patch:
- Ignore XErrors from the COW (LP: #1911036)
  * d/p/cssshadowvalue-Apply-device-scale-to-the-offset-when.patch:
- Apply device scale to the offset when blurring text
  (LP: #1919404)

 -- Daniel van Vugt   Thu, 25 Mar 2021
16:17:15 +0100

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to gtk+3.0 in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1911036

Title:
  GDK/GTK app crash in XFCE when performing drag operation (in
  gdk_window_cache_new <- gdk_window_cache_get <-
  drag_context_find_window_cache <- gdk_x11_drag_context_find_window)

Status in GTK+:
  Unknown
Status in gtk+3.0 package in Ubuntu:
  Fix Committed
Status in gtk4 package in Ubuntu:
  Fix Committed

Bug description:
  For many months now, whenever any mouse drag is attempted in an
  application using the gtk tool kit, the application immediately
  crashes. I've noticed this at least in Firefox and thunar. It also
  occurs when displaying these applications from a Virtualbox machine or
  from another server running something other than Ubuntu.  The VM was
  running CentOS 8 and the remote server was running Mageia. Both
  Firefox and thunar run fine with Mageia's Xorg. It seems like the
  issue may be with the Xorg server on Ubuntu.

  I tried setting the GDK_SYNCHRONIZE variable to various settings but
  was unable to produce further debug output. The only other debug
  output I was able to gather is when running thunar with the --gtk-
  debug parameter (attached). I also tried running thunar with GDB but
  without recompiling it, it doesn't produce much information other than
  it's stopping in glib.

  Let me know what other information I can provide.

  (firefox:110380): Gdk-ERROR **: 13:47:04.663: The program 'firefox' received 
an X Window System error.
  This probably reflects a bug in the program.
  The error was 'BadWindow (invalid Window parameter)'.
(Details: serial 8405 error_code 3 request_code 141 (Composite) minor_code 
8)
(Note to programmers: normally, X errors are reported asynchronously;
 that is, you will receive the error a while after causing it.
 To debug your program, run it with the GDK_SYNCHRONIZE environment
 variable to change this behavior. You can then get a meaningful
 backtrace from your debugger if you break on the gdk_x_error() function.)
  ExceptionHandler::GenerateDump cloned child 110611
  ExceptionHandler::SendContinueSignalToChild sent continue signal to child
  ExceptionHandler::WaitForContinueSignal waiting for continue signal...
  Exiting due to channel error.
  Exiting due to channel error.
  Exiting due to channel error.
  Exiting due to channel error.
  [1]+  Trace/breakpoint trap   (core dumped) firefox

  (Thunar:2961220): Gdk-ERROR **: 13:55:39.621: The program 'Thunar' received 
an X Window System error.
  This probably reflects a bug in the program.
  The error was 'BadWindow (invalid Window parameter)'.
(Details: serial 64804 error_code 3 request_code 141 (Composite) minor_code 
8)
(Note to programmers: normally, X errors are reported asynchronously;
 that is, you will receive the error a while after causing it.
 To debug your program, run it with the GDK_SYNCHRONIZE environment
 variable to change this behavior. You can then get a meaningful
 backtrace from your debugger if you break on the gdk_x_error() function.)
  Trace/breakpoint trap (core dumped)

  $ ldd /bin/thunar
  linux-vdso.so.1 (0x7ffc0c8cc000)
  libthunarx-3.so.0 => /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libthunarx-3.so.0 
(0x7fdbb548c000)
  libexo-2.so.0 => /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libexo-2.so.0 
(0x7fdbb544f000)
  libgudev-1.0.so.0 => /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libgudev-1.0.so.0 
(0x7fdbb5442000)
  libnotify.so.4 => /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libnotify.so.4 
(0x7fdbb5437000)
  libSM.so.6 => /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libSM.so.6 (0x7fdbb542c000)
  libICE.so.6 => /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libICE.so.6 (0x7fdbb540e000)
  libxfce4ui-2.so.0 => /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libxfce4ui-2.so.0 
(0x7fdbb53f3000)
  libgtk-3.so.0 => /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libgtk-3.so.0 
(0x7fdbb4c42000)
  libgdk-3.so.0 => /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libgdk-3.so.0 
(0x7fdbb4b3d000)
  libatk-1.0.so.0 => /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libatk-1.0.so.0 
(0x7fdbb4b13000)
  libcairo.so.2 => /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libcairo.so.2 
(0x7fdbb49f)
  libgdk_pixbuf-2.0.so.0 => 
/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libgdk_pixbuf-2.0.so.0 (0x7fdbb49c8000)
  libxfce4util.so.7 => /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libxfce4util.so.7 
(0x7fdbb49b4000)
  libxfconf-0.so.3 => /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libxfconf-0.so.3 
(0x7fdbb4996000)
  libpango-1.0.so.0 => /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libpango-1.0.so.0 
(0x7fdbb4947000)
  

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1919404] Re: Desktop icon shadows are broken at scale 200%

2021-03-25 Thread Daniel van Vugt
Now in hirsute-proposed:

gtk+3.0 (3.24.25-1ubuntu3) hirsute; urgency=medium

  * d/p/x11-dnd-Ignore-XErrors-from-the-COW.patch:
- Ignore XErrors from the COW (LP: #1911036)
  * d/p/cssshadowvalue-Apply-device-scale-to-the-offset-when.patch:
- Apply device scale to the offset when blurring text
  (LP: #1919404)

 -- Daniel van Vugt   Thu, 25 Mar 2021
16:17:15 +0100

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to gtk+3.0 in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1919404

Title:
  Desktop icon shadows are broken at scale 200%

Status in Gnome Shell Extension Desktop Icons Ng:
  Unknown
Status in gnome-shell-extension-desktop-icons-ng package in Ubuntu:
  Invalid
Status in gtk+3.0 package in Ubuntu:
  Fix Committed

Bug description:
  Desktop icon shadows are broken at scale 200%.

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/gnome-shell-extension-desktop-icons-ng/+bug/1919404/+subscriptions

-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
Post to : touch-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


[Touch-packages] [Bug 1874824] Re: pgrep reports error "cannot allocate" when run without stack limit

2021-03-25 Thread Mathew Hodson
** Changed in: procps (Ubuntu Focal)
   Importance: Undecided => Medium

** Changed in: procps (Ubuntu Groovy)
   Importance: Undecided => Medium

** Changed in: procps (Ubuntu Hirsute)
   Importance: Undecided => Medium

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to procps in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1874824

Title:
  pgrep reports error "cannot allocate" when run without stack limit

Status in procps package in Ubuntu:
  Fix Committed
Status in procps source package in Focal:
  In Progress
Status in procps source package in Groovy:
  In Progress
Status in procps source package in Hirsute:
  Fix Committed
Status in procps package in Debian:
  New

Bug description:
  [Impact]

- Users who have ulimit set high would see either slow
  or failed pgrep and pkill commands
- Users who have ulimit set to unlimited would see
  failed pgrep and pkill commands
- This bug occurs because the behavior of sysconf(_SC_ARG_MAX)
  changed with a newer version of the kernel.

  [Test Case]

- set the ulimit to unlimited by running `ulimit -S -s unlimited`
- run `pgrep bash` to see that the "cannot allocate" error is
   printed and the command has failed.

  [Where Problems Could Occur]

- We have set upper and lower limits on the size of the malloc, but
  if further kernel versions break the call to sysconf in
  unexpected ways we could still see problems.

  [Original Description]

  If you have no stack limit (ulimit -S -s unlimited), any pgrep call
  will fail with an error:

  > pgrep vim
  pgrep: cannot allocate 4611686018427387903 bytes

  If you have a high stack limit (e.g. ulimit -S -s 50), pgrep is
  very slow:

  > time pgrep vim
  2196
  real 8.48s user 8.40s syst 0.07s busy 99% rmem 253444

  The relevant upstream bug report could be: 
https://gitlab.com/procps-ng/procps/-/issues/152
  Archlinux bug report: https://bugs.archlinux.org/task/66093

  procps:
    Installed: 2:3.3.16-1ubuntu2
    500 http://archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu focal/main amd64 Packages

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/procps/+bug/1874824/+subscriptions

-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
Post to : touch-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


[Touch-packages] [Bug 1615381] Autopkgtest regression report (apt/2.0.5)

2021-03-25 Thread Ubuntu SRU Bot
All autopkgtests for the newly accepted apt (2.0.5) for focal have finished 
running.
The following regressions have been reported in tests triggered by the package:

reprotest/0.7.14 (s390x, ppc64el)


Please visit the excuses page listed below and investigate the failures, 
proceeding afterwards as per the StableReleaseUpdates policy regarding 
autopkgtest regressions [1].

https://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-archive/proposed-
migration/focal/update_excuses.html#apt

[1] https://wiki.ubuntu.com/StableReleaseUpdates#Autopkgtest_Regressions

Thank you!

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to unattended-upgrades in
Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1615381

Title:
  apt-get autoremove may remove current kernel

Status in apt package in Ubuntu:
  Fix Released
Status in unattended-upgrades package in Ubuntu:
  Fix Released
Status in unattended-upgrades source package in Trusty:
  Won't Fix
Status in unattended-upgrades source package in Xenial:
  Fix Released
Status in unattended-upgrades source package in Artful:
  Won't Fix
Status in apt source package in Bionic:
  Fix Committed
Status in apt source package in Focal:
  Fix Committed
Status in apt source package in Groovy:
  Fix Committed
Status in apt source package in Hirsute:
  Fix Released

Bug description:
  [Impact]
  APT will try and fail to remove the currently running kernel, when booted 
into an older kernel that is not protected. May wreak some havoc if mixed with 
other operations to the point that apt goes weird and needs manual fixing up.

  [Test case]
  For the SRUs we have included an automated test case that starts with an 
empty autoremove config file, and then checks that the running kernel is 
protected at runtime.

  You can also test manually, but it's not necessary:

  - Install new kernel
  - Reboot into kernel not listed as protected in 01autoremove-kernels
  - Run autoremove

  [Where problems could occur]
  We may more easily run out of space in /boot. hirsute has new autoremoval 
code that runs completely at runtime; but that seems a bit large to SRU after 
only a few weeks in hirsute. Hence, we should protect the current kernel _in 
addition_ to the other kernels, just like unattended-upgrades and 
update-manager do. This increases the risk of filling up /boot compared to 
older apt versions, but is at the same level as unattended-upgrades and 
update-manager.

  [Original bug report]

  This may happen, if you boot one of the older kernels, that is not
  protected by /etc/apt/apt.conf.d/01autoremove-kernels

  Workaround: run
  /etc/kernel/postinst.d/apt-auto-removal
  during each boot (e.g. by using cron).
  Note: The workaround breaks autoremoving feature of new unneeded kernels in  
unattended-upgrades i.e. the setting 
'Unattended-Upgrade::Remove-New-Unused-Dependencies "true"' (which is default 
in 16.04 unless 'Unattended-Upgrade::Remove-Unused-Dependencies "true"' is set 
in '/etc/apt/apt.conf.d/50unattended-upgrades'.

  In shell:

  $ uname -r
  4.4.0-22-generic
  $ apt-get -s autoremove
  NOTE: This is only a simulation!
    apt-get needs root privileges for real execution.
    Keep also in mind that locking is deactivated,
    so don't depend on the relevance to the real current situation!
  Reading package lists... Done
  Building dependency tree
  Reading state information... Done
  The following packages will be REMOVED:
    linux-headers-4.4.0-21 linux-headers-4.4.0-21-generic linux-headers-4.4.0-22
    linux-headers-4.4.0-22-generic linux-headers-4.4.0-31-generic
    linux-image-4.4.0-21-generic linux-image-4.4.0-22-generic
    linux-image-4.4.0-31-generic linux-image-extra-4.4.0-21-generic
    linux-image-extra-4.4.0-22-generic linux-image-extra-4.4.0-31-generic
  0 upgraded, 0 newly installed, 11 to remove and 13 not upgraded.

  ProblemType: Bug
  DistroRelease: Ubuntu 16.04
  Package: apt 1.2.12~ubuntu16.04.1
  ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 4.4.0-22.40-generic 4.4.8
  Uname: Linux 4.4.0-22-generic x86_64
  ApportVersion: 2.20.1-0ubuntu2.1
  Architecture: amd64
  CurrentDesktop: XFCE
  Date: Sun Aug 21 16:11:27 2016
  EcryptfsInUse: Yes
  InstallationDate: Installed on 2016-04-28 (114 days ago)
  InstallationMedia: Xubuntu 16.04 LTS "Xenial Xerus" - Release amd64 
(20160420.1)
  SourcePackage: apt
  UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install)
  modified.conffile..etc.kernel.postinst.d.apt-auto-removal: [modified]
  mtime.conffile..etc.kernel.postinst.d.apt-auto-removal: 
2016-07-30T12:15:32.706300

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/apt/+bug/1615381/+subscriptions

-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
Post to : touch-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


[Touch-packages] [Bug 1693900] Autopkgtest regression report (apt/2.0.5)

2021-03-25 Thread Ubuntu SRU Bot
All autopkgtests for the newly accepted apt (2.0.5) for focal have finished 
running.
The following regressions have been reported in tests triggered by the package:

reprotest/0.7.14 (s390x, ppc64el)


Please visit the excuses page listed below and investigate the failures, 
proceeding afterwards as per the StableReleaseUpdates policy regarding 
autopkgtest regressions [1].

https://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-archive/proposed-
migration/focal/update_excuses.html#apt

[1] https://wiki.ubuntu.com/StableReleaseUpdates#Autopkgtest_Regressions

Thank you!

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to apt in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1693900

Title:
  apt-get update should return exit code != 0 on error

Status in apt package in Ubuntu:
  Fix Released
Status in apt source package in Xenial:
  New
Status in apt source package in Bionic:
  Fix Committed
Status in apt source package in Focal:
  Fix Committed
Status in apt source package in Groovy:
  Fix Committed

Bug description:
  [Impact]
  There is no way for scripts to run apt update and be sure that it was 
entirely successful.

  We introduce a new flag, --error-mode=any that makes apt update also
  error out on transient errors.

  [Test plan]
  We have included a test in the test-suite in 
test-apt-update-failure-propagation that ensures that warnings become errors.

  [Where problems could occur]
  If there's an issue some warnings for transient errors could become errors, 
or worse I suppose it's possible but unlikely for errors to be reported as 
warnings...

  Since the new behavior is behind a flag, regression potential for
  existing scripts is low if there is no bug.

  [Original bug report]

  When running 'apt-get update' (e.g. on a container install post-
  install script), apt-get return with exit code 0, even so it wasn't
  able to "update" properly. E.g.:

  + apt-get update
  Err:1 http://de.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu xenial InRelease
    Temporary failure resolving 'de.archive.ubuntu.com'
  Err:2 http://security.ubuntu.com/ubuntu xenial-security InRelease
    Temporary failure resolving 'security.ubuntu.com'
  Err:3 http://de.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu xenial-updates InRelease
    Temporary failure resolving 'de.archive.ubuntu.com'
  Reading package lists... Done
  W: Failed to fetch http://de.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/dists/xenial/InRelease 
 Temporary failure resolving 'de.archive.ubuntu.com'
  W: Failed to fetch 
http://de.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/dists/xenial-updates/InRelease  Temporary 
failure resolving 'de.archive.ubuntu.com'
  W: Failed to fetch 
http://security.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/dists/xenial-security/InRelease  Temporary 
failure resolving 'security.ubuntu.com'
  W: Some index files failed to download. They have been ignored, or old ones 
used instead.

  It should be corrected to return useful exit code, so that scripts can
  take the appropriate actions ...

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/apt/+bug/1693900/+subscriptions

-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
Post to : touch-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


[Touch-packages] [Bug 1877987] Autopkgtest regression report (apt/2.0.5)

2021-03-25 Thread Ubuntu SRU Bot
All autopkgtests for the newly accepted apt (2.0.5) for focal have finished 
running.
The following regressions have been reported in tests triggered by the package:

reprotest/0.7.14 (s390x, ppc64el)


Please visit the excuses page listed below and investigate the failures, 
proceeding afterwards as per the StableReleaseUpdates policy regarding 
autopkgtest regressions [1].

https://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-archive/proposed-
migration/focal/update_excuses.html#apt

[1] https://wiki.ubuntu.com/StableReleaseUpdates#Autopkgtest_Regressions

Thank you!

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to apt in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1877987

Title:
  apt search coredumping

Status in apt package in Ubuntu:
  Fix Released
Status in apt source package in Focal:
  Fix Committed

Bug description:
  [Impact]
  Search sometimes crashes if no translated description is available, as the 
translated description object was used without a check as to whether it exists.

  [Test case]
  No reproducer available at the moment.

  
  [Where problems could occur]
  In search command only, and only when looking at descriptions

  [Original bug report]
  root@citoyx:/var/crash# apt search jdk
  Sorting... Done
  Segmentation fault (core dumped)

  May 11 12:34:25 citoyx kernel: [ 1354.337907] apt[10418]: segfault at 
7f67292dcfc0 ip 7f6309ce4997 sp 7ffdab880930 error 4 in 
libapt-pkg.so.6.0.0[7f6309bb5000+147000]
  May 11 12:34:25 citoyx kernel: [ 1354.337916] Code: 48 8b 45 18 48 8b 04 d0 
48 83 c4 08 5b 5d c3 0f 1f 40 00 f3 0f 1e fa 55 48 89 fd 53 48 89 f3 48 83 ec 
08 48 8b 06 48 8b 4e 08 <8b> 10 48 8d 04 d5 00 00 00 00 48 29 d0 48 8b 51 60 48 
8d 04 c2 0f

  root@citoyx:/var/crash# cat /etc/lsb-release
  DISTRIB_ID=Ubuntu
  DISTRIB_RELEASE=20.04
  DISTRIB_CODENAME=focal
  DISTRIB_DESCRIPTION="Ubuntu 20.04 LTS"

  apt search is coredumping
  While apt install/upgrade/update is running fine

  crash file in attachment.

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/apt/+bug/1877987/+subscriptions

-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
Post to : touch-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


[Touch-packages] [Bug 1916725] Autopkgtest regression report (apt/2.0.5)

2021-03-25 Thread Ubuntu SRU Bot
All autopkgtests for the newly accepted apt (2.0.5) for focal have finished 
running.
The following regressions have been reported in tests triggered by the package:

reprotest/0.7.14 (s390x, ppc64el)


Please visit the excuses page listed below and investigate the failures, 
proceeding afterwards as per the StableReleaseUpdates policy regarding 
autopkgtest regressions [1].

https://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-archive/proposed-
migration/focal/update_excuses.html#apt

[1] https://wiki.ubuntu.com/StableReleaseUpdates#Autopkgtest_Regressions

Thank you!

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to apt in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1916725

Title:
  Protected/Important packages are not deconfigured, require Force-
  LoopBreak

Status in apt package in Ubuntu:
  Fix Released
Status in apt source package in Bionic:
  Fix Committed
Status in apt source package in Focal:
  Fix Committed
Status in apt source package in Groovy:
  Fix Committed
Status in apt source package in Hirsute:
  Fix Released

Bug description:
  [Impact]
  If a package that is Protected: yes (or Important: yes), or one of it's 
dependencies, is involved in a dependency loop with Breaks, APT requires 
APT::Force-LoopBreak instead of resolving the situation directly.

  On focal, we also introduce the actual support for protected packages
  to enable upgrading to later releases more easily (in case a protected
  package needs to be removed during the upgrade), and to make the
  backport more similar to main.

  [Test plan]
  Run the integration test suite (the autopkgtest) :)

  Our test suite covers the tests for both Breaks and Conflicts.

  Breaks:

  protected-sysvinit (= 1) without dependencies is installed
  protected-sysvinit (= 2) Pre-Depends protected-systemd-sysv
  protected-systemd-sysv (= 2) Breaks: protected-sysvinit (<< 2)

  Test: Install protected-sysvinit (= 2)
  Expected result: Unpacking protected-sysvinit (= 2) deconfigures 
protected-sysvinit (= 1), and then we unpack and configure protected-sysvinit 
(= 2) and end up with a working system.

  Conflicts: As for Breaks, but the Conflicts will remove the package
  temporarily, requiring the use of APT::Force-LoopBreak option.

  For focal, we also do have a test to check that the Protected field is
  being used.

  [Where problems could occur]
  We now allow dpkg to automatically deconfigure protected packages. This 
should just make them behave like normal packages to APT's eye, but bugs I 
guess could occur somewhere in the APT/dpkg interaction (this only applies to 
releases with Protected support in dpkg, Important is not affected, it's always 
been "normal" for dpkg).

  During development, we accidentally simplified the patch so much that
  Conflicts did not require Force-LoopBreak for temporary removal. We
  fixed that, but it points out that there is a place where the loop
  break check happens that is a potential regression place.

  On focal, we pass additional flags to dpkg that focal's dpkg does not
  understand, however, we only do that if dpkg asserts it does that, so
  in practice, this should all work fine and the code path will only be
  taken with >=groovy dpkg.

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/apt/+bug/1916725/+subscriptions

-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
Post to : touch-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


[Touch-packages] [Bug 1918907] Autopkgtest regression report (apt/2.0.5)

2021-03-25 Thread Ubuntu SRU Bot
All autopkgtests for the newly accepted apt (2.0.5) for focal have finished 
running.
The following regressions have been reported in tests triggered by the package:

reprotest/0.7.14 (s390x, ppc64el)


Please visit the excuses page listed below and investigate the failures, 
proceeding afterwards as per the StableReleaseUpdates policy regarding 
autopkgtest regressions [1].

https://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-archive/proposed-
migration/focal/update_excuses.html#apt

[1] https://wiki.ubuntu.com/StableReleaseUpdates#Autopkgtest_Regressions

Thank you!

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to apt in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1918907

Title:
  Default Acquire::AllowReleaseInfoChange::Suite to "true"

Status in apt package in Ubuntu:
  Fix Released
Status in apt source package in Bionic:
  Fix Committed
Status in apt source package in Focal:
  Fix Committed

Bug description:
  [Impact]
  APT 1.6-2.0 deny third-party repositories from changing their Suite value. 
This change was reverted in later apt releases, and will be reverted in 1.8 in 
Debian as well, so for consistency, we want to push that change to stable

  [Test plan]
  We added test cases to our extensive integration test suite run by 
autopkgtest.

  [Where problems could occur]
  It's hard to imagine anything here, we simply turn the flag for allowed from 
false to true. We even add tests for Suite changes :)

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/apt/+bug/1918907/+subscriptions

-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
Post to : touch-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


[Touch-packages] [Bug 1916050] Autopkgtest regression report (apt/2.0.5)

2021-03-25 Thread Ubuntu SRU Bot
All autopkgtests for the newly accepted apt (2.0.5) for focal have finished 
running.
The following regressions have been reported in tests triggered by the package:

reprotest/0.7.14 (s390x, ppc64el)


Please visit the excuses page listed below and investigate the failures, 
proceeding afterwards as per the StableReleaseUpdates policy regarding 
autopkgtest regressions [1].

https://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-archive/proposed-
migration/focal/update_excuses.html#apt

[1] https://wiki.ubuntu.com/StableReleaseUpdates#Autopkgtest_Regressions

Thank you!

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to apt in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1916050

Title:
  Invalid base64 for high-bit characters

Status in apt package in Ubuntu:
  Fix Released
Status in apt source package in Xenial:
  Confirmed
Status in apt source package in Bionic:
  Fix Committed
Status in apt source package in Focal:
  Fix Committed
Status in apt source package in Groovy:
  Fix Committed
Status in apt source package in Hirsute:
  Fix Released

Bug description:
  [Impact]
  The Base64Encode function incorrectly encodes using char instead of uint8_t, 
leading to characters with the high bit set to be encoded wrongly. This 
function is used for base authentication, and high bits are set for UTF-8 
character sequences, so it's likely affecting people with utf-8 user names and 
passwords and might cause them to be denied access to their https resources 
(though arguably they'd work around that).

  [Test case]
  A unit test has been added that checks that the encoding is correct.

  [Where problems could occur]
  This only affects the base64 encoding function, which is only used for 
quoting user names and passwords in basic auth in http, but it's also exposed 
to library users and like in python-apt, so problems could occur wherever they 
use that base64 encoding function as well.

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/apt/+bug/1916050/+subscriptions

-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
Post to : touch-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


[Touch-packages] [Bug 1907850] Autopkgtest regression report (apt/2.0.5)

2021-03-25 Thread Ubuntu SRU Bot
All autopkgtests for the newly accepted apt (2.0.5) for focal have finished 
running.
The following regressions have been reported in tests triggered by the package:

reprotest/0.7.14 (s390x, ppc64el)


Please visit the excuses page listed below and investigate the failures, 
proceeding afterwards as per the StableReleaseUpdates policy regarding 
autopkgtest regressions [1].

https://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-archive/proposed-
migration/focal/update_excuses.html#apt

[1] https://wiki.ubuntu.com/StableReleaseUpdates#Autopkgtest_Regressions

Thank you!

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to apt in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1907850

Title:
  Cache not generated for all translations

Status in apt package in Ubuntu:
  Fix Released
Status in apt source package in Xenial:
  Confirmed
Status in apt source package in Bionic:
  Fix Committed
Status in apt source package in Focal:
  Fix Committed
Status in apt source package in Groovy:
  Fix Committed
Status in apt source package in Hirsute:
  Fix Released

Bug description:
  [Impact]
  In bug 1161743 we discovered that if a system is configured with multiple 
locales, only the locales of the user who generated the apt-cache will be 
available for translated descriptions.

  [Test case]
  An automated test case has been included as a snippet in  
test/integration/test-bug-49-search-in-all-translations which runs during 
autopkgtest. That's sufficient for validation.

  Manual test:

  # apt install locales-all # get the locale
  # export LANG=sv_SE.UTF-8
  # locale
  LANG=sv_SE.UTF-8
  LANGUAGE=
  LC_CTYPE="sv_SE.UTF-8"
  LC_NUMERIC="sv_SE.UTF-8"
  LC_TIME="sv_SE.UTF-8"
  LC_COLLATE="sv_SE.UTF-8"
  LC_MONETARY="sv_SE.UTF-8"
  LC_MESSAGES="sv_SE.UTF-8"
  LC_PAPER="sv_SE.UTF-8"
  LC_NAME="sv_SE.UTF-8"
  LC_ADDRESS="sv_SE.UTF-8"
  LC_TELEPHONE="sv_SE.UTF-8"
  LC_MEASUREMENT="sv_SE.UTF-8"
  LC_IDENTIFICATION="sv_SE.UTF-8"
  LC_ALL=
  # apt update
  # apt-cache show tasksel | grep Desc
  Description-sv: tool for selecting tasks for installation on Debian systems
  Description-md5: cbbb747708986d11ea77c80b9b038fec
  # apt-cache showpkg tasksel
  Package: tasksel
  Versions:
  3.34ubuntu16 
(/var/lib/apt/lists/archive.ubuntu.com_ubuntu_dists_groovy_main_binary-amd64_Packages)
   Description Language:
   File: 
/var/lib/apt/lists/archive.ubuntu.com_ubuntu_dists_groovy_main_binary-amd64_Packages
    MD5: cbbb747708986d11ea77c80b9b038fec
   Description Language: sv
   File: 
/var/lib/apt/lists/archive.ubuntu.com_ubuntu_dists_groovy_main_i18n_Translation-sv
    MD5: cbbb747708986d11ea77c80b9b038fec
   Description Language: en
   File: 
/var/lib/apt/lists/archive.ubuntu.com_ubuntu_dists_groovy_main_i18n_Translation-en
    MD5: cbbb747708986d11ea77c80b9b038fec
  [...]

  So far so good, but now assume the root user actually has C configured
  as locale, and e.g. runs apt-cache show (or apt-daily.service does an
  update):

  root@g:~# rm /var/cache/apt/*.bin
  root@g:~# LANG=C apt-cache  show tasksel
  [...]
  Description-en: tool for selecting tasks for installation on Debian systems
   This package provides 'tasksel', a simple interface for users who
   want to configure their system to perform a specific task.

  root@g:~# apt-cache  showpkg tasksel
  Package: tasksel
  Versions:
  3.34ubuntu16 
(/var/lib/apt/lists/archive.ubuntu.com_ubuntu_dists_groovy_main_binary-amd64_Packages)
   Description Language:
   File: 
/var/lib/apt/lists/archive.ubuntu.com_ubuntu_dists_groovy_main_binary-amd64_Packages
    MD5: cbbb747708986d11ea77c80b9b038fec
   Description Language: en
   File: 
/var/lib/apt/lists/archive.ubuntu.com_ubuntu_dists_groovy_main_i18n_Translation-en
    MD5: cbbb747708986d11ea77c80b9b038fec

  This should show the sv locale as well given that it's still around
  (also we are still running with LANG=sv_SE.UTF-8), but it only
  generated the cache with the english language description in here.

  [Where problems could occur]
  People might end up seeing a wrong translation if other code paths are wrong, 
but then they'd already see them if they explicitly configured multiple 
languages and then switched the preferred one.

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/apt/+bug/1907850/+subscriptions

-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
Post to : touch-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


[Touch-packages] [Bug 1918920] Autopkgtest regression report (apt/2.0.5)

2021-03-25 Thread Ubuntu SRU Bot
All autopkgtests for the newly accepted apt (2.0.5) for focal have finished 
running.
The following regressions have been reported in tests triggered by the package:

reprotest/0.7.14 (s390x, ppc64el)


Please visit the excuses page listed below and investigate the failures, 
proceeding afterwards as per the StableReleaseUpdates policy regarding 
autopkgtest regressions [1].

https://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-archive/proposed-
migration/focal/update_excuses.html#apt

[1] https://wiki.ubuntu.com/StableReleaseUpdates#Autopkgtest_Regressions

Thank you!

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to apt in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1918920

Title:
  Harden test for no new acquires after transaction abort

Status in apt package in Ubuntu:
  Fix Committed
Status in apt source package in Bionic:
  Fix Committed
Status in apt source package in Focal:
  Fix Committed
Status in apt source package in Groovy:
  Fix Committed

Bug description:
  [Impact]
  test-pdiff-usage is somewhat flaky, especially on Debian, this makes it less 
flaky. No end user impact as it's a test-only change.

  [Test plan]
  Running autopkgtest, which runs our extensive integration test suite which 
includes the changed test.

  [Where problems could occur]
  No end user regression potential on its own, but might slightly change 
regression potential for future pdiff changes:

  Test approach is slightly different now. It still catches that updates
  fail correctly, but tests more concretely that a transaction was
  aborted rather than that no worker received work (which was not
  guaranteed, the work could be scheduled before it was aborted).

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/apt/+bug/1918920/+subscriptions

-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
Post to : touch-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


[Touch-packages] [Bug 1920987] Re: IANA tzdata file format cannot represent different country code for a given timezone in different time periods [ i.e. Europe/Simferopol country code changes ]; iso 3

2021-03-25 Thread Dimitri John Ledkov
"America" does not maintain neither tzdata nor ISO 3166-2 database, both
of which are delegated to international community of Internet Standards
via RFC & to a committee headquartered in Genera with delegates from all
around the world. All of which has lots of experience with classifying
and updating territorial disputes, as and when things change.

I would like to remind everyone to be respectful, and to not make any
generalizations of any individuals based on apparent or perceived
country of origin. Note that participation on the Launchpad bug tracker
for Ubuntu is subject to the Ubuntu Code of Conduct
https://ubuntu.com/community/code-of-conduct

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to iso-codes in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1920987

Title:
  IANA tzdata file format cannot represent different country code for a
  given timezone in different time periods [ i.e. Europe/Simferopol
  country code changes ]; iso 3166-2 has no RU subdivisions for Crimea

Status in iso-codes package in Ubuntu:
  New
Status in tzdata package in Ubuntu:
  Opinion

Bug description:
  Europe/Simferopol,  Crimea is RUSSIA

  ProblemType: Bug
  DistroRelease: Ubuntu 21.04
  Package: tzdata 2021a-1ubuntu1
  ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 5.11.0-11.12-generic 5.11.0
  Uname: Linux 5.11.0-11-generic x86_64
  ApportVersion: 2.20.11-0ubuntu60
  Architecture: amd64
  CurrentDesktop: MATE
  Date: Tue Mar 23 21:44:56 2021
  InstallationDate: Installed on 2021-03-21 (1 days ago)
  InstallationMedia: Ubuntu-MATE 21.04 "Hirsute Hippo" - Alpha amd64 (20210321)
  PackageArchitecture: all
  SourcePackage: tzdata
  UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install)

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/iso-codes/+bug/1920987/+subscriptions

-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
Post to : touch-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


[Touch-packages] [Bug 1920837] Re: apport bugs from official raspi or riscv images are not identified

2021-03-25 Thread Brian Murray
** Description changed:

  It would be helpful if bugs reported from images for Raspberry Pi's or
  RISCV systems were tagged so that one could search for bugs from systems
  running those images e.g. 'raspi-image'.
+ 
+ [Test Case]
+ After installing a preinstalled image of Ubuntu for Raspberry Pi do the 
following:
+ 1) run 'ubuntu-bug apport'
+ 2) view the bug report and check the Tags field
+ 
+ With the current version of apport you will not see the tag 'raspi-image'.
+ With the version of apport in -proposed you will see the tag 'raspi-image'.
+ 
+ [Where problems could occur]
+ If the code being added is syntactically incorrect then we'd see a Traceback 
which would be bad as it could affect all bug / crash reports.
+ 
+ [Other Info]
+ Since there aren't any Groovy images for RISC-V there will be nothing to test 
there.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to apport in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1920837

Title:
  apport bugs from official raspi or riscv images are not identified

Status in apport package in Ubuntu:
  Fix Released
Status in apport source package in Focal:
  In Progress
Status in apport source package in Groovy:
  In Progress

Bug description:
  It would be helpful if bugs reported from images for Raspberry Pi's or
  RISCV systems were tagged so that one could search for bugs from
  systems running those images e.g. 'raspi-image'.

  [Test Case]
  After installing a preinstalled image of Ubuntu for Raspberry Pi do the 
following:
  1) run 'ubuntu-bug apport'
  2) view the bug report and check the Tags field

  With the current version of apport you will not see the tag 'raspi-image'.
  With the version of apport in -proposed you will see the tag 'raspi-image'.

  [Where problems could occur]
  If the code being added is syntactically incorrect then we'd see a Traceback 
which would be bad as it could affect all bug / crash reports.

  [Other Info]
  Since there aren't any Groovy images for RISC-V there will be nothing to test 
there.

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/apport/+bug/1920837/+subscriptions

-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
Post to : touch-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


[Touch-packages] [Bug 1920837] Re: apport bugs from official raspi or riscv images are not identified

2021-03-25 Thread Brian Murray
** Also affects: apport (Ubuntu Groovy)
   Importance: Undecided
   Status: New

** Also affects: apport (Ubuntu Focal)
   Importance: Undecided
   Status: New

** Changed in: apport (Ubuntu Focal)
   Status: New => In Progress

** Changed in: apport (Ubuntu Focal)
 Assignee: (unassigned) => Brian Murray (brian-murray)

** Changed in: apport (Ubuntu Groovy)
   Status: New => In Progress

** Changed in: apport (Ubuntu Groovy)
 Assignee: (unassigned) => Brian Murray (brian-murray)

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to apport in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1920837

Title:
  apport bugs from official raspi or riscv images are not identified

Status in apport package in Ubuntu:
  Fix Released
Status in apport source package in Focal:
  In Progress
Status in apport source package in Groovy:
  In Progress

Bug description:
  It would be helpful if bugs reported from images for Raspberry Pi's or
  RISCV systems were tagged so that one could search for bugs from
  systems running those images e.g. 'raspi-image'.

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/apport/+bug/1920837/+subscriptions

-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
Post to : touch-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


[Touch-packages] [Bug 1921423] Re: package sudo 1.8.31-1ubuntu1.2 failed to install/upgrade: o subprocesso instalado, do pacote sudo, o script post-installation retornou erro do status de saída 1

2021-03-25 Thread Seth Arnold
Hello Alex, I would guess that the reason why the permissions are
incorrect is probably whatever tool added four copies of this to your
sudoers:

ALL ALL=(ALL) NOPASSWD:/usr/share/dtsremoter/remoterserver
ALL ALL=(ALL) NOPASSWD:/usr/share/dtsremoter/remoterdelegate

Any tool that would do that is probably pretty poorly written. That's my
guess where to lay blame.

If you don't have any open root command shells, I suggest rebooting into
a recovery mode to change the permissions on the file. If you get the
same "Operação não permitida" response, try chattr -i /etc/sudoers and
then try again.

Thanks

** Changed in: sudo (Ubuntu)
   Status: New => Incomplete

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to sudo in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1921423

Title:
  package sudo 1.8.31-1ubuntu1.2 failed to install/upgrade: o
  subprocesso instalado, do pacote sudo, o script post-installation
  retornou erro do status de saída 1

Status in sudo package in Ubuntu:
  Incomplete

Bug description:
  The privileges of my /etc/sudoers file is 220. I don't have any idea
  on how it was changed, and I tried many different ways to chmod it and
  I didn't get to do it, even booting from another media and trying to
  chmod the file didn't work.

  It's the main reason of the many errors that started happening when
  updating this machine.

  I can't stop this machine now, and I don't want to run the risk of
  trying to use the installation software to try to repair it.

  If you have any idea on how to chmod the file, I'll be grateful.

  Best regards,

  Alex Leandro Rosa

  ProblemType: Package
  DistroRelease: Ubuntu 20.04
  Package: sudo 1.8.31-1ubuntu1.2
  ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 5.4.0-70.78-generic 5.4.94
  Uname: Linux 5.4.0-70-generic x86_64
  ApportVersion: 2.20.11-0ubuntu27.16
  Architecture: amd64
  CasperMD5CheckResult: skip
  Date: Thu Mar 25 15:00:47 2021
  ErrorMessage: o subprocesso instalado, do pacote sudo, o script 
post-installation retornou erro do status de saída 1
  InstallationDate: Installed on 2018-12-12 (833 days ago)
  InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 18.04 LTS "Bionic Beaver" - Release amd64 (20180426)
  Python3Details: /usr/bin/python3.8, Python 3.8.5, python3-minimal, 
3.8.2-0ubuntu2
  PythonDetails: /usr/bin/python2.7, Python 2.7.18, python-is-python2, 2.7.17-4
  RelatedPackageVersions:
   dpkg 1.19.7ubuntu3
   apt  2.0.4
  SourcePackage: sudo
  Title: package sudo 1.8.31-1ubuntu1.2 failed to install/upgrade: o 
subprocesso instalado, do pacote sudo, o script post-installation retornou erro 
do status de saída 1
  UpgradeStatus: Upgraded to focal on 2020-09-30 (175 days ago)
  VisudoCheck:
   /etc/sudoers: análise OK
   /etc/sudoers.d/README: análise OK
  mtime.conffile..etc.sudoers: 2020-12-30T18:27:17.782421

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/sudo/+bug/1921423/+subscriptions

-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
Post to : touch-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


[Touch-packages] [Bug 1919977] Re: heap-buffer-overflow in old libwebp

2021-03-25 Thread Avital Ostromich
Thank you for reporting this issue. Have you reported this to the upstream 
libwebp developers? If not, we encourage you to report it (you can do so here: 
https://bugs.chromium.org/p/webp/issues/list) and keep us in the loop if 
possible.
Thank you

** Information type changed from Private Security to Public Security

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to libwebp in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1919977

Title:
  heap-buffer-overflow in old libwebp

Status in libwebp package in Ubuntu:
  New

Bug description:
  
  I found an overflow error when testing the security of ImageMagick on 
ubuntu20.02. The error exists in the libwebp library, and the old version is 
used in the system source. When ImageMagick calls the libwebp library to parse 
the webp file, an overflow occurs.

  system info:
  Distributor ID:   Ubuntu
  Description:  Ubuntu 20.04.2 LTS
  Release:  20.04
  Codename: focal

  Edith by issues:https://github.com/ImageMagick/ImageMagick/issues/3403

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libwebp/+bug/1919977/+subscriptions

-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
Post to : touch-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


[Touch-packages] [Bug 1615381] Autopkgtest regression report (apt/1.6.13)

2021-03-25 Thread Ubuntu SRU Bot
All autopkgtests for the newly accepted apt (1.6.13) for bionic have finished 
running.
The following regressions have been reported in tests triggered by the package:

apport/2.20.9-0ubuntu7.23 (amd64, i386)


Please visit the excuses page listed below and investigate the failures, 
proceeding afterwards as per the StableReleaseUpdates policy regarding 
autopkgtest regressions [1].

https://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-archive/proposed-
migration/bionic/update_excuses.html#apt

[1] https://wiki.ubuntu.com/StableReleaseUpdates#Autopkgtest_Regressions

Thank you!

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to unattended-upgrades in
Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1615381

Title:
  apt-get autoremove may remove current kernel

Status in apt package in Ubuntu:
  Fix Released
Status in unattended-upgrades package in Ubuntu:
  Fix Released
Status in unattended-upgrades source package in Trusty:
  Won't Fix
Status in unattended-upgrades source package in Xenial:
  Fix Released
Status in unattended-upgrades source package in Artful:
  Won't Fix
Status in apt source package in Bionic:
  Fix Committed
Status in apt source package in Focal:
  Fix Committed
Status in apt source package in Groovy:
  Fix Committed
Status in apt source package in Hirsute:
  Fix Released

Bug description:
  [Impact]
  APT will try and fail to remove the currently running kernel, when booted 
into an older kernel that is not protected. May wreak some havoc if mixed with 
other operations to the point that apt goes weird and needs manual fixing up.

  [Test case]
  For the SRUs we have included an automated test case that starts with an 
empty autoremove config file, and then checks that the running kernel is 
protected at runtime.

  You can also test manually, but it's not necessary:

  - Install new kernel
  - Reboot into kernel not listed as protected in 01autoremove-kernels
  - Run autoremove

  [Where problems could occur]
  We may more easily run out of space in /boot. hirsute has new autoremoval 
code that runs completely at runtime; but that seems a bit large to SRU after 
only a few weeks in hirsute. Hence, we should protect the current kernel _in 
addition_ to the other kernels, just like unattended-upgrades and 
update-manager do. This increases the risk of filling up /boot compared to 
older apt versions, but is at the same level as unattended-upgrades and 
update-manager.

  [Original bug report]

  This may happen, if you boot one of the older kernels, that is not
  protected by /etc/apt/apt.conf.d/01autoremove-kernels

  Workaround: run
  /etc/kernel/postinst.d/apt-auto-removal
  during each boot (e.g. by using cron).
  Note: The workaround breaks autoremoving feature of new unneeded kernels in  
unattended-upgrades i.e. the setting 
'Unattended-Upgrade::Remove-New-Unused-Dependencies "true"' (which is default 
in 16.04 unless 'Unattended-Upgrade::Remove-Unused-Dependencies "true"' is set 
in '/etc/apt/apt.conf.d/50unattended-upgrades'.

  In shell:

  $ uname -r
  4.4.0-22-generic
  $ apt-get -s autoremove
  NOTE: This is only a simulation!
    apt-get needs root privileges for real execution.
    Keep also in mind that locking is deactivated,
    so don't depend on the relevance to the real current situation!
  Reading package lists... Done
  Building dependency tree
  Reading state information... Done
  The following packages will be REMOVED:
    linux-headers-4.4.0-21 linux-headers-4.4.0-21-generic linux-headers-4.4.0-22
    linux-headers-4.4.0-22-generic linux-headers-4.4.0-31-generic
    linux-image-4.4.0-21-generic linux-image-4.4.0-22-generic
    linux-image-4.4.0-31-generic linux-image-extra-4.4.0-21-generic
    linux-image-extra-4.4.0-22-generic linux-image-extra-4.4.0-31-generic
  0 upgraded, 0 newly installed, 11 to remove and 13 not upgraded.

  ProblemType: Bug
  DistroRelease: Ubuntu 16.04
  Package: apt 1.2.12~ubuntu16.04.1
  ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 4.4.0-22.40-generic 4.4.8
  Uname: Linux 4.4.0-22-generic x86_64
  ApportVersion: 2.20.1-0ubuntu2.1
  Architecture: amd64
  CurrentDesktop: XFCE
  Date: Sun Aug 21 16:11:27 2016
  EcryptfsInUse: Yes
  InstallationDate: Installed on 2016-04-28 (114 days ago)
  InstallationMedia: Xubuntu 16.04 LTS "Xenial Xerus" - Release amd64 
(20160420.1)
  SourcePackage: apt
  UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install)
  modified.conffile..etc.kernel.postinst.d.apt-auto-removal: [modified]
  mtime.conffile..etc.kernel.postinst.d.apt-auto-removal: 
2016-07-30T12:15:32.706300

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/apt/+bug/1615381/+subscriptions

-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
Post to : touch-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


[Touch-packages] [Bug 1693900] Autopkgtest regression report (apt/1.6.13)

2021-03-25 Thread Ubuntu SRU Bot
All autopkgtests for the newly accepted apt (1.6.13) for bionic have finished 
running.
The following regressions have been reported in tests triggered by the package:

apport/2.20.9-0ubuntu7.23 (amd64, i386)


Please visit the excuses page listed below and investigate the failures, 
proceeding afterwards as per the StableReleaseUpdates policy regarding 
autopkgtest regressions [1].

https://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-archive/proposed-
migration/bionic/update_excuses.html#apt

[1] https://wiki.ubuntu.com/StableReleaseUpdates#Autopkgtest_Regressions

Thank you!

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to apt in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1693900

Title:
  apt-get update should return exit code != 0 on error

Status in apt package in Ubuntu:
  Fix Released
Status in apt source package in Xenial:
  New
Status in apt source package in Bionic:
  Fix Committed
Status in apt source package in Focal:
  Fix Committed
Status in apt source package in Groovy:
  Fix Committed

Bug description:
  [Impact]
  There is no way for scripts to run apt update and be sure that it was 
entirely successful.

  We introduce a new flag, --error-mode=any that makes apt update also
  error out on transient errors.

  [Test plan]
  We have included a test in the test-suite in 
test-apt-update-failure-propagation that ensures that warnings become errors.

  [Where problems could occur]
  If there's an issue some warnings for transient errors could become errors, 
or worse I suppose it's possible but unlikely for errors to be reported as 
warnings...

  Since the new behavior is behind a flag, regression potential for
  existing scripts is low if there is no bug.

  [Original bug report]

  When running 'apt-get update' (e.g. on a container install post-
  install script), apt-get return with exit code 0, even so it wasn't
  able to "update" properly. E.g.:

  + apt-get update
  Err:1 http://de.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu xenial InRelease
    Temporary failure resolving 'de.archive.ubuntu.com'
  Err:2 http://security.ubuntu.com/ubuntu xenial-security InRelease
    Temporary failure resolving 'security.ubuntu.com'
  Err:3 http://de.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu xenial-updates InRelease
    Temporary failure resolving 'de.archive.ubuntu.com'
  Reading package lists... Done
  W: Failed to fetch http://de.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/dists/xenial/InRelease 
 Temporary failure resolving 'de.archive.ubuntu.com'
  W: Failed to fetch 
http://de.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/dists/xenial-updates/InRelease  Temporary 
failure resolving 'de.archive.ubuntu.com'
  W: Failed to fetch 
http://security.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/dists/xenial-security/InRelease  Temporary 
failure resolving 'security.ubuntu.com'
  W: Some index files failed to download. They have been ignored, or old ones 
used instead.

  It should be corrected to return useful exit code, so that scripts can
  take the appropriate actions ...

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/apt/+bug/1693900/+subscriptions

-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
Post to : touch-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


[Touch-packages] [Bug 1806076] Autopkgtest regression report (apt/1.6.13)

2021-03-25 Thread Ubuntu SRU Bot
All autopkgtests for the newly accepted apt (1.6.13) for bionic have finished 
running.
The following regressions have been reported in tests triggered by the package:

apport/2.20.9-0ubuntu7.23 (amd64, i386)


Please visit the excuses page listed below and investigate the failures, 
proceeding afterwards as per the StableReleaseUpdates policy regarding 
autopkgtest regressions [1].

https://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-archive/proposed-
migration/bionic/update_excuses.html#apt

[1] https://wiki.ubuntu.com/StableReleaseUpdates#Autopkgtest_Regressions

Thank you!

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to apt in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1806076

Title:
  unattended-upgrade --help raises UnicodeEncodeError when stdout
  encoding is ascii

Status in apt package in Ubuntu:
  Fix Released
Status in unattended-upgrades package in Ubuntu:
  Won't Fix
Status in apt source package in Xenial:
  New
Status in unattended-upgrades source package in Xenial:
  Won't Fix
Status in apt source package in Bionic:
  Fix Committed
Status in unattended-upgrades source package in Bionic:
  Won't Fix

Bug description:
  [Impact]

   * unattended-upgrades --help crashes in apt.systemd.daily script when
  locale is not in UTF-8.

  [Test Case]

  In the fixed case no crash is observed.

  rbalint@yogi:~$ lxc launch ubuntu:18.04 bb-lp-1806076
  Creating bb-lp-1806076
  Starting bb-lp-1806076
  rbalint@yogi:~$ lxc shell bb-lp-1806076
  mesg: ttyname failed: No such device
  root@bb-lp-1806076:~# apt install -yqq language-pack-ru-base
  The following package was automatically installed and is no longer required:
    libfreetype6
  Use 'apt autoremove' to remove it.
  The following additional packages will be installed:
    language-pack-ru
  The following NEW packages will be installed:
    language-pack-ru language-pack-ru-base
  0 upgraded, 2 newly installed, 0 to remove and 7 not upgraded.
  Need to get 2310 kB of archives.
  After this operation, 11.8 MB of additional disk space will be used.
  Selecting previously unselected package language-pack-ru-base.
  (Reading database ... 28536 files and directories currently installed.)
  Preparing to unpack .../language-pack-ru-base_1%3a18.04+20180712_all.deb ...
  Unpacking language-pack-ru-base (1:18.04+20180712) ...
  Selecting previously unselected package language-pack-ru.
  Preparing to unpack .../language-pack-ru_1%3a18.04+20180712_all.deb ...
  Unpacking language-pack-ru (1:18.04+20180712) ...
  Setting up language-pack-ru (1:18.04+20180712) ...
  Setting up language-pack-ru-base (1:18.04+20180712) ...
  Generating locales (this might take a while)...
    ru_RU.UTF-8... done
    ru_UA.UTF-8... done
  Generation complete.

  root@bb-lp-1806076:~# echo LANG=ru_RU | tee /etc/default/locale 
  LANG=ru_RU
  root@bb-lp-1806076:~#
  /usr/lib/apt/apt.systemd.daily update
  Traceback (most recent call last):
File "/usr/bin/unattended-upgrade", line 2171, in 
  (options, args) = parser.parse_args()  # type: ignore
File "/usr/lib/python3.6/optparse.py", line 1387, in parse_args
  stop = self._process_args(largs, rargs, values)
File "/usr/lib/python3.6/optparse.py", line 1427, in _process_args
  self._process_long_opt(rargs, values)
File "/usr/lib/python3.6/optparse.py", line 1501, in _process_long_opt
  option.process(opt, value, values, self)
File "/usr/lib/python3.6/optparse.py", line 785, in process
  self.action, self.dest, opt, value, values, parser)
File "/usr/lib/python3.6/optparse.py", line 807, in take_action
  parser.print_help()
File "/usr/lib/python3.6/optparse.py", line 1647, in print_help
  file.write(self.format_help())
  UnicodeEncodeError: 'ascii' codec can't encode characters in position 
126-133: ordinal not in range(128)

  root@bb-lp-1806076:~# echo LANG=ru_RU.UTF-8 | tee /etc/default/locale 
  LANG=ru_RU.UTF-8
  root@bb-lp-1806076:~# /usr/lib/apt/apt.systemd.daily update
  root@bb-lp-1806076:~#

  [Where problems could occur]

  * Nowhere, really. The fix is setting LC_ALL=C.UFT-8 for u-u --help
  and it is processed by grep then.

  
  [Original Bug Text]

  The Ubuntu Error Tracker has been receiving reports about a problem regarding 
unattended-upgrades.  This problem was most recently seen with package version 
1.1ubuntu1.18.04.6, the problem page at 
https://errors.ubuntu.com/problem/b3e3265e302351558260f54ae37c7b4c193dfc95 
contains more details, including versions of packages affected, stacktrace or 
traceback, and individual crash reports.
  If you do not have access to the Ubuntu Error Tracker and are a software 
developer, you can request it at http://forms.canonical.com/reports/.

  Also seen in:
   * https://errors.ubuntu.com/problem/936bb1c75c4efe018f968a5773b820bcf52c298a

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/apt/+bug/1806076/+subscriptions

-- 
Mailing 

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1871268] Autopkgtest regression report (apt/1.6.13)

2021-03-25 Thread Ubuntu SRU Bot
All autopkgtests for the newly accepted apt (1.6.13) for bionic have finished 
running.
The following regressions have been reported in tests triggered by the package:

apport/2.20.9-0ubuntu7.23 (amd64, i386)


Please visit the excuses page listed below and investigate the failures, 
proceeding afterwards as per the StableReleaseUpdates policy regarding 
autopkgtest regressions [1].

https://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-archive/proposed-
migration/bionic/update_excuses.html#apt

[1] https://wiki.ubuntu.com/StableReleaseUpdates#Autopkgtest_Regressions

Thank you!

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to apt in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1871268

Title:
  Installation fails due to useless immediate configuration error when
  "Install Third-Party Drivers" is selected

Status in Ubuntu CD Images:
  Fix Released
Status in apt package in Ubuntu:
  Fix Released
Status in apt source package in Bionic:
  Fix Committed
Status in apt source package in Focal:
  Fix Released
Status in apt source package in Groovy:
  Fix Released
Status in apt package in Debian:
  Fix Released

Bug description:
  [Impact]
  Installations that really succeeded would then fail because APT could not 
immediately configure a package. Which is a pointless way to fail at that 
point, because everything did work out anyway.

  We have two changes that help address this:

  * The first one stops immediately configuring multi-arch siblings
  (e.g. libc6:i386 when it's configuring libc6:amd64). This was not
  necessary, and caused all the libc6:i386 failures here.

  * The second change sort of also supersedes the first one: It just
  ignores any errors from immediate configuration, relying on the fact
  that it's checked and rectified at a later point if there are
  unconfigured packages (which is what made all those failures happen
  spuriously after having successfully installed everything).

  [Test case]
  We have one test case in EIPP format in the Debian bug 973305 which was only 
helped by the second change, not the first one. Run /usr/lib/apt/planners < 
eipp.log and check there are no errors.

  TODO: It's unclear if the APT from proposed installed in the live
  session will fix the installer, needs investigation, but would make a
  useful test case.

  [Regression potential]
  It's imaginable that we missed something somewhere and some path that checked 
for a set error doesn't check it anymore, and we report success when we hit an 
error, but it seems unlikely.

  Behavior of --simulate changes. This used to fail before as well, and
  will now only produce a warning. We don't believe that is a reason of
  concern.

  [Groovy SRU]
  The groovy SRU is a sync of the 2.1.11 micro release from Debian unstable 
which also incorporates changes to the documentation: A typo fix, replacing 
focal with groovy in examples, and minor Dutch manual pages translation updates.

  We do not have test cases for the documentation changes, and we do not
  consider there to be a huge regression potential. As long as they
  build, they should be readable - maybe some words are wrong in the
  translation, who knows.

  [Original bug report]
  Test Case
  1. Install Ubuntu Desktop on hardware with an nVidia card and select to 
install 3rd party drivers
  2. Proceed with installation

  The following error message is displayed in /var/log/syslog
  /plugininstall.py: Verifying downloads ...
  /plugininstall.py: Failed to find package object for 
/cdrom//pool/main/g/gcc-defaults/gcc_9.3.0-1ubuntu2_amd64.deb: "Version: 
'9.3.0-1ubuntu2' not found."
  /plugininstall.py: Failed to find package object for 
/cdrom//pool/main/libx/libxcrypt/libcrypt-dev_4.4.10-10ubuntu4_amd64.deb: 
"Version: '4.4.10-10ubuntu4' not found."
  /plugininstall.py: Failed to find package object for 
/cdrom//pool/main/g/gcc-defaults/g++_9.3.0-1ubuntu2_amd64.deb: "Version: 
'9.3.0-1ubuntu2' not found."
  /plugininstall.py: Failed to find package object for 
/cdrom//pool/main/z/zlib/zlib1g_1.2.11.dfsg-2ubuntu1_i386.deb: "Version: 
'1.2.11.dfsg-2ubuntu1' not found."
  /plugininstall.py: Failed to find package object for 
/cdrom//pool/main/libx/libxau/libxau6_1.0.9-0ubuntu1_i386.deb: "Version: 
'1.0.9-0ubuntu1' not found."
  /plugininstall.py: Failed to find package object for 
/cdrom//pool/main/libx/libxdmcp/libxdmcp6_1.1.3-0ubuntu1_i386.deb: "Version: 
'1.1.3-0ubuntu1' not found."
  /plugininstall.py: Failed to find package object for 
/cdrom//pool/main/libx/libx11/libx11-6_1.6.9-2ubuntu1_i386.deb: "Version: 
'1.6.9-2ubuntu1' not found."
  /plugininstall.py: Failed to find package object for 
/cdrom//pool/main/libx/libxext/libxext6_1.3.4-0ubuntu1_i386.deb: "Version: 
'1.3.4-0ubuntu1' not found."
  /plugininstall.py: Failed to find package object for 
/cdrom//pool/main/l/lm-sensors/libsensors5_3.6.0-2ubuntu1_i386.deb: "Version: 
'3.6.0-2ubuntu1' not found."
  /plugininstall.py: Failed to find package 

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1907850] Autopkgtest regression report (apt/1.6.13)

2021-03-25 Thread Ubuntu SRU Bot
All autopkgtests for the newly accepted apt (1.6.13) for bionic have finished 
running.
The following regressions have been reported in tests triggered by the package:

apport/2.20.9-0ubuntu7.23 (amd64, i386)


Please visit the excuses page listed below and investigate the failures, 
proceeding afterwards as per the StableReleaseUpdates policy regarding 
autopkgtest regressions [1].

https://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-archive/proposed-
migration/bionic/update_excuses.html#apt

[1] https://wiki.ubuntu.com/StableReleaseUpdates#Autopkgtest_Regressions

Thank you!

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to apt in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1907850

Title:
  Cache not generated for all translations

Status in apt package in Ubuntu:
  Fix Released
Status in apt source package in Xenial:
  Confirmed
Status in apt source package in Bionic:
  Fix Committed
Status in apt source package in Focal:
  Fix Committed
Status in apt source package in Groovy:
  Fix Committed
Status in apt source package in Hirsute:
  Fix Released

Bug description:
  [Impact]
  In bug 1161743 we discovered that if a system is configured with multiple 
locales, only the locales of the user who generated the apt-cache will be 
available for translated descriptions.

  [Test case]
  An automated test case has been included as a snippet in  
test/integration/test-bug-49-search-in-all-translations which runs during 
autopkgtest. That's sufficient for validation.

  Manual test:

  # apt install locales-all # get the locale
  # export LANG=sv_SE.UTF-8
  # locale
  LANG=sv_SE.UTF-8
  LANGUAGE=
  LC_CTYPE="sv_SE.UTF-8"
  LC_NUMERIC="sv_SE.UTF-8"
  LC_TIME="sv_SE.UTF-8"
  LC_COLLATE="sv_SE.UTF-8"
  LC_MONETARY="sv_SE.UTF-8"
  LC_MESSAGES="sv_SE.UTF-8"
  LC_PAPER="sv_SE.UTF-8"
  LC_NAME="sv_SE.UTF-8"
  LC_ADDRESS="sv_SE.UTF-8"
  LC_TELEPHONE="sv_SE.UTF-8"
  LC_MEASUREMENT="sv_SE.UTF-8"
  LC_IDENTIFICATION="sv_SE.UTF-8"
  LC_ALL=
  # apt update
  # apt-cache show tasksel | grep Desc
  Description-sv: tool for selecting tasks for installation on Debian systems
  Description-md5: cbbb747708986d11ea77c80b9b038fec
  # apt-cache showpkg tasksel
  Package: tasksel
  Versions:
  3.34ubuntu16 
(/var/lib/apt/lists/archive.ubuntu.com_ubuntu_dists_groovy_main_binary-amd64_Packages)
   Description Language:
   File: 
/var/lib/apt/lists/archive.ubuntu.com_ubuntu_dists_groovy_main_binary-amd64_Packages
    MD5: cbbb747708986d11ea77c80b9b038fec
   Description Language: sv
   File: 
/var/lib/apt/lists/archive.ubuntu.com_ubuntu_dists_groovy_main_i18n_Translation-sv
    MD5: cbbb747708986d11ea77c80b9b038fec
   Description Language: en
   File: 
/var/lib/apt/lists/archive.ubuntu.com_ubuntu_dists_groovy_main_i18n_Translation-en
    MD5: cbbb747708986d11ea77c80b9b038fec
  [...]

  So far so good, but now assume the root user actually has C configured
  as locale, and e.g. runs apt-cache show (or apt-daily.service does an
  update):

  root@g:~# rm /var/cache/apt/*.bin
  root@g:~# LANG=C apt-cache  show tasksel
  [...]
  Description-en: tool for selecting tasks for installation on Debian systems
   This package provides 'tasksel', a simple interface for users who
   want to configure their system to perform a specific task.

  root@g:~# apt-cache  showpkg tasksel
  Package: tasksel
  Versions:
  3.34ubuntu16 
(/var/lib/apt/lists/archive.ubuntu.com_ubuntu_dists_groovy_main_binary-amd64_Packages)
   Description Language:
   File: 
/var/lib/apt/lists/archive.ubuntu.com_ubuntu_dists_groovy_main_binary-amd64_Packages
    MD5: cbbb747708986d11ea77c80b9b038fec
   Description Language: en
   File: 
/var/lib/apt/lists/archive.ubuntu.com_ubuntu_dists_groovy_main_i18n_Translation-en
    MD5: cbbb747708986d11ea77c80b9b038fec

  This should show the sv locale as well given that it's still around
  (also we are still running with LANG=sv_SE.UTF-8), but it only
  generated the cache with the english language description in here.

  [Where problems could occur]
  People might end up seeing a wrong translation if other code paths are wrong, 
but then they'd already see them if they explicitly configured multiple 
languages and then switched the preferred one.

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/apt/+bug/1907850/+subscriptions

-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
Post to : touch-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


[Touch-packages] [Bug 1916050] Autopkgtest regression report (apt/1.6.13)

2021-03-25 Thread Ubuntu SRU Bot
All autopkgtests for the newly accepted apt (1.6.13) for bionic have finished 
running.
The following regressions have been reported in tests triggered by the package:

apport/2.20.9-0ubuntu7.23 (amd64, i386)


Please visit the excuses page listed below and investigate the failures, 
proceeding afterwards as per the StableReleaseUpdates policy regarding 
autopkgtest regressions [1].

https://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-archive/proposed-
migration/bionic/update_excuses.html#apt

[1] https://wiki.ubuntu.com/StableReleaseUpdates#Autopkgtest_Regressions

Thank you!

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to apt in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1916050

Title:
  Invalid base64 for high-bit characters

Status in apt package in Ubuntu:
  Fix Released
Status in apt source package in Xenial:
  Confirmed
Status in apt source package in Bionic:
  Fix Committed
Status in apt source package in Focal:
  Fix Committed
Status in apt source package in Groovy:
  Fix Committed
Status in apt source package in Hirsute:
  Fix Released

Bug description:
  [Impact]
  The Base64Encode function incorrectly encodes using char instead of uint8_t, 
leading to characters with the high bit set to be encoded wrongly. This 
function is used for base authentication, and high bits are set for UTF-8 
character sequences, so it's likely affecting people with utf-8 user names and 
passwords and might cause them to be denied access to their https resources 
(though arguably they'd work around that).

  [Test case]
  A unit test has been added that checks that the encoding is correct.

  [Where problems could occur]
  This only affects the base64 encoding function, which is only used for 
quoting user names and passwords in basic auth in http, but it's also exposed 
to library users and like in python-apt, so problems could occur wherever they 
use that base64 encoding function as well.

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/apt/+bug/1916050/+subscriptions

-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
Post to : touch-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


[Touch-packages] [Bug 1916725] Autopkgtest regression report (apt/1.6.13)

2021-03-25 Thread Ubuntu SRU Bot
All autopkgtests for the newly accepted apt (1.6.13) for bionic have finished 
running.
The following regressions have been reported in tests triggered by the package:

apport/2.20.9-0ubuntu7.23 (amd64, i386)


Please visit the excuses page listed below and investigate the failures, 
proceeding afterwards as per the StableReleaseUpdates policy regarding 
autopkgtest regressions [1].

https://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-archive/proposed-
migration/bionic/update_excuses.html#apt

[1] https://wiki.ubuntu.com/StableReleaseUpdates#Autopkgtest_Regressions

Thank you!

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to apt in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1916725

Title:
  Protected/Important packages are not deconfigured, require Force-
  LoopBreak

Status in apt package in Ubuntu:
  Fix Released
Status in apt source package in Bionic:
  Fix Committed
Status in apt source package in Focal:
  Fix Committed
Status in apt source package in Groovy:
  Fix Committed
Status in apt source package in Hirsute:
  Fix Released

Bug description:
  [Impact]
  If a package that is Protected: yes (or Important: yes), or one of it's 
dependencies, is involved in a dependency loop with Breaks, APT requires 
APT::Force-LoopBreak instead of resolving the situation directly.

  On focal, we also introduce the actual support for protected packages
  to enable upgrading to later releases more easily (in case a protected
  package needs to be removed during the upgrade), and to make the
  backport more similar to main.

  [Test plan]
  Run the integration test suite (the autopkgtest) :)

  Our test suite covers the tests for both Breaks and Conflicts.

  Breaks:

  protected-sysvinit (= 1) without dependencies is installed
  protected-sysvinit (= 2) Pre-Depends protected-systemd-sysv
  protected-systemd-sysv (= 2) Breaks: protected-sysvinit (<< 2)

  Test: Install protected-sysvinit (= 2)
  Expected result: Unpacking protected-sysvinit (= 2) deconfigures 
protected-sysvinit (= 1), and then we unpack and configure protected-sysvinit 
(= 2) and end up with a working system.

  Conflicts: As for Breaks, but the Conflicts will remove the package
  temporarily, requiring the use of APT::Force-LoopBreak option.

  For focal, we also do have a test to check that the Protected field is
  being used.

  [Where problems could occur]
  We now allow dpkg to automatically deconfigure protected packages. This 
should just make them behave like normal packages to APT's eye, but bugs I 
guess could occur somewhere in the APT/dpkg interaction (this only applies to 
releases with Protected support in dpkg, Important is not affected, it's always 
been "normal" for dpkg).

  During development, we accidentally simplified the patch so much that
  Conflicts did not require Force-LoopBreak for temporary removal. We
  fixed that, but it points out that there is a place where the loop
  break check happens that is a potential regression place.

  On focal, we pass additional flags to dpkg that focal's dpkg does not
  understand, however, we only do that if dpkg asserts it does that, so
  in practice, this should all work fine and the code path will only be
  taken with >=groovy dpkg.

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/apt/+bug/1916725/+subscriptions

-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
Post to : touch-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


[Touch-packages] [Bug 1918907] Autopkgtest regression report (apt/1.6.13)

2021-03-25 Thread Ubuntu SRU Bot
All autopkgtests for the newly accepted apt (1.6.13) for bionic have finished 
running.
The following regressions have been reported in tests triggered by the package:

apport/2.20.9-0ubuntu7.23 (amd64, i386)


Please visit the excuses page listed below and investigate the failures, 
proceeding afterwards as per the StableReleaseUpdates policy regarding 
autopkgtest regressions [1].

https://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-archive/proposed-
migration/bionic/update_excuses.html#apt

[1] https://wiki.ubuntu.com/StableReleaseUpdates#Autopkgtest_Regressions

Thank you!

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to apt in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1918907

Title:
  Default Acquire::AllowReleaseInfoChange::Suite to "true"

Status in apt package in Ubuntu:
  Fix Released
Status in apt source package in Bionic:
  Fix Committed
Status in apt source package in Focal:
  Fix Committed

Bug description:
  [Impact]
  APT 1.6-2.0 deny third-party repositories from changing their Suite value. 
This change was reverted in later apt releases, and will be reverted in 1.8 in 
Debian as well, so for consistency, we want to push that change to stable

  [Test plan]
  We added test cases to our extensive integration test suite run by 
autopkgtest.

  [Where problems could occur]
  It's hard to imagine anything here, we simply turn the flag for allowed from 
false to true. We even add tests for Suite changes :)

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/apt/+bug/1918907/+subscriptions

-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
Post to : touch-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


[Touch-packages] [Bug 1918920] Autopkgtest regression report (apt/1.6.13)

2021-03-25 Thread Ubuntu SRU Bot
All autopkgtests for the newly accepted apt (1.6.13) for bionic have finished 
running.
The following regressions have been reported in tests triggered by the package:

apport/2.20.9-0ubuntu7.23 (amd64, i386)


Please visit the excuses page listed below and investigate the failures, 
proceeding afterwards as per the StableReleaseUpdates policy regarding 
autopkgtest regressions [1].

https://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-archive/proposed-
migration/bionic/update_excuses.html#apt

[1] https://wiki.ubuntu.com/StableReleaseUpdates#Autopkgtest_Regressions

Thank you!

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to apt in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1918920

Title:
  Harden test for no new acquires after transaction abort

Status in apt package in Ubuntu:
  Fix Committed
Status in apt source package in Bionic:
  Fix Committed
Status in apt source package in Focal:
  Fix Committed
Status in apt source package in Groovy:
  Fix Committed

Bug description:
  [Impact]
  test-pdiff-usage is somewhat flaky, especially on Debian, this makes it less 
flaky. No end user impact as it's a test-only change.

  [Test plan]
  Running autopkgtest, which runs our extensive integration test suite which 
includes the changed test.

  [Where problems could occur]
  No end user regression potential on its own, but might slightly change 
regression potential for future pdiff changes:

  Test approach is slightly different now. It still catches that updates
  fail correctly, but tests more concretely that a transaction was
  aborted rather than that no worker received work (which was not
  guaranteed, the work could be scheduled before it was aborted).

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/apt/+bug/1918920/+subscriptions

-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
Post to : touch-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


[Touch-packages] [Bug 1920640] Re: EXPKEYSIG C8CAB6595FDFF622 Ubuntu Debug Symbol Archive Automatic Signing Key (2016)

2021-03-25 Thread Brian Murray
Hello Felipe, or anyone else affected,

Accepted ubuntu-keyring into focal-proposed. The package will build now
and be available at https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-
keyring/2020.02.11.3 in a few hours, and then in the -proposed
repository.

Please help us by testing this new package.  See
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Testing/EnableProposed for documentation on how
to enable and use -proposed.  Your feedback will aid us getting this
update out to other Ubuntu users.

If this package fixes the bug for you, please add a comment to this bug,
mentioning the version of the package you tested, what testing has been
performed on the package and change the tag from verification-needed-
focal to verification-done-focal. If it does not fix the bug for you,
please add a comment stating that, and change the tag to verification-
failed-focal. In either case, without details of your testing we will
not be able to proceed.

Further information regarding the verification process can be found at
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/QATeam/PerformingSRUVerification .  Thank you in
advance for helping!

N.B. The updated package will be released to -updates after the bug(s)
fixed by this package have been verified and the package has been in
-proposed for a minimum of 7 days.

** Changed in: ubuntu-keyring (Ubuntu Focal)
   Status: In Progress => Fix Committed

** Tags added: verification-needed-focal

** Changed in: ubuntu-keyring (Ubuntu Bionic)
   Status: In Progress => Fix Committed

** Tags added: verification-needed-bionic

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to ubuntu-keyring in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1920640

Title:
  EXPKEYSIG C8CAB6595FDFF622 Ubuntu Debug Symbol Archive Automatic
  Signing Key (2016) 

Status in ubuntu-keyring package in Ubuntu:
  Fix Released
Status in ubuntu-keyring source package in Bionic:
  Fix Committed
Status in ubuntu-keyring source package in Focal:
  Fix Committed
Status in ubuntu-keyring source package in Groovy:
  Fix Committed
Status in ubuntu-keyring source package in Hirsute:
  Fix Released

Bug description:
  [Impact]

   * Cannot update apt metadata from ddebs.ubuntu.com whilst using
  ubuntu-dbgsym-keyring package

  [Test Plan]

   * Install ubuntu-dbgsym-keyring package
   * Add ddebs.ubuntu.com repository for your release
   * sudo apt update must be successful

  [Where problems could occur]

   * At the moment the signature was bumped by one year
   * Meaning this issue will occur again in 2022
   * Instead the key must be set to not expire & new round of SRUs issued

  [Other Info]
   
   * Original bug report

  The public key used by the debugging symbols repository
  /usr/share/keyrings/ubuntu-dbgsym-keyring.gpg from the package ubuntu-
  dbgsym-keyring expired.

  $ apt policy ubuntu-dbgsym-keyring
  ubuntu-dbgsym-keyring:
    Installed: 2020.02.11.2
    Candidate: 2020.02.11.2
    Version table:
   *** 2020.02.11.2 500
  500 http://archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu focal/main amd64 Packages
  500 http://archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu focal/main i386 Packages
  100 /var/lib/dpkg/status
  $ gpg --no-default-keyring --keyring 
/usr/share/keyrings/ubuntu-dbgsym-keyring.gpg --list-keys
  /usr/share/keyrings/ubuntu-dbgsym-keyring.gpg
  -
  pub   rsa4096 2016-03-21 [SC] [expired: 2021-03-20]
    F2EDC64DC5AEE1F6B9C621F0C8CAB6595FDFF622
  uid   [ expired] Ubuntu Debug Symbol Archive Automatic Signing Key 
(2016) 

  Error message on "apt update":

  E: The repository 'http://ddebs.ubuntu.com bionic-updates Release' is not 
signed.
  N: Updating from such a repository can't be done securely, and is therefore 
disabled by default.
  N: See apt-secure(8) manpage for repository creation and user configuration 
details.
  W: GPG error: http://ddebs.ubuntu.com bionic Release: The following 
signatures were invalid: EXPKEYSIG C8CAB6595FDFF622 Ubuntu Debug Symbol Archive 
Automatic Signing Key (2016) 
  E: The repository 'http://ddebs.ubuntu.com bionic Release' is not signed.
  N: Updating from such a repository can't be done securely, and is therefore 
disabled by default.
  N: See apt-secure(8) manpage for repository creation and user configuration 
details.
  W: GPG error: http://ddebs.ubuntu.com bionic-proposed Release: The following 
signatures were invalid: EXPKEYSIG C8CAB6595FDFF622 Ubuntu Debug Symbol Archive 
Automatic Signing Key (2016) 
  E: The repository 'http://ddebs.ubuntu.com bionic-proposed Release' is not 
signed.
  N: Updating from such a repository can't be done securely, and is therefore 
disabled by default.
  N: See apt-secure(8) manpage for repository creation and user configuration 
details.

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-keyring/+bug/1920640/+subscriptions

-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
Post to : 

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1920640] Please test proposed package

2021-03-25 Thread Brian Murray
Hello Felipe, or anyone else affected,

Accepted ubuntu-keyring into bionic-proposed. The package will build now
and be available at https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-
keyring/2018.09.18.1~18.04.1 in a few hours, and then in the -proposed
repository.

Please help us by testing this new package.  See
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Testing/EnableProposed for documentation on how
to enable and use -proposed.  Your feedback will aid us getting this
update out to other Ubuntu users.

If this package fixes the bug for you, please add a comment to this bug,
mentioning the version of the package you tested, what testing has been
performed on the package and change the tag from verification-needed-
bionic to verification-done-bionic. If it does not fix the bug for you,
please add a comment stating that, and change the tag to verification-
failed-bionic. In either case, without details of your testing we will
not be able to proceed.

Further information regarding the verification process can be found at
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/QATeam/PerformingSRUVerification .  Thank you in
advance for helping!

N.B. The updated package will be released to -updates after the bug(s)
fixed by this package have been verified and the package has been in
-proposed for a minimum of 7 days.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to ubuntu-keyring in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1920640

Title:
  EXPKEYSIG C8CAB6595FDFF622 Ubuntu Debug Symbol Archive Automatic
  Signing Key (2016) 

Status in ubuntu-keyring package in Ubuntu:
  Fix Released
Status in ubuntu-keyring source package in Bionic:
  Fix Committed
Status in ubuntu-keyring source package in Focal:
  Fix Committed
Status in ubuntu-keyring source package in Groovy:
  Fix Committed
Status in ubuntu-keyring source package in Hirsute:
  Fix Released

Bug description:
  [Impact]

   * Cannot update apt metadata from ddebs.ubuntu.com whilst using
  ubuntu-dbgsym-keyring package

  [Test Plan]

   * Install ubuntu-dbgsym-keyring package
   * Add ddebs.ubuntu.com repository for your release
   * sudo apt update must be successful

  [Where problems could occur]

   * At the moment the signature was bumped by one year
   * Meaning this issue will occur again in 2022
   * Instead the key must be set to not expire & new round of SRUs issued

  [Other Info]
   
   * Original bug report

  The public key used by the debugging symbols repository
  /usr/share/keyrings/ubuntu-dbgsym-keyring.gpg from the package ubuntu-
  dbgsym-keyring expired.

  $ apt policy ubuntu-dbgsym-keyring
  ubuntu-dbgsym-keyring:
    Installed: 2020.02.11.2
    Candidate: 2020.02.11.2
    Version table:
   *** 2020.02.11.2 500
  500 http://archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu focal/main amd64 Packages
  500 http://archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu focal/main i386 Packages
  100 /var/lib/dpkg/status
  $ gpg --no-default-keyring --keyring 
/usr/share/keyrings/ubuntu-dbgsym-keyring.gpg --list-keys
  /usr/share/keyrings/ubuntu-dbgsym-keyring.gpg
  -
  pub   rsa4096 2016-03-21 [SC] [expired: 2021-03-20]
    F2EDC64DC5AEE1F6B9C621F0C8CAB6595FDFF622
  uid   [ expired] Ubuntu Debug Symbol Archive Automatic Signing Key 
(2016) 

  Error message on "apt update":

  E: The repository 'http://ddebs.ubuntu.com bionic-updates Release' is not 
signed.
  N: Updating from such a repository can't be done securely, and is therefore 
disabled by default.
  N: See apt-secure(8) manpage for repository creation and user configuration 
details.
  W: GPG error: http://ddebs.ubuntu.com bionic Release: The following 
signatures were invalid: EXPKEYSIG C8CAB6595FDFF622 Ubuntu Debug Symbol Archive 
Automatic Signing Key (2016) 
  E: The repository 'http://ddebs.ubuntu.com bionic Release' is not signed.
  N: Updating from such a repository can't be done securely, and is therefore 
disabled by default.
  N: See apt-secure(8) manpage for repository creation and user configuration 
details.
  W: GPG error: http://ddebs.ubuntu.com bionic-proposed Release: The following 
signatures were invalid: EXPKEYSIG C8CAB6595FDFF622 Ubuntu Debug Symbol Archive 
Automatic Signing Key (2016) 
  E: The repository 'http://ddebs.ubuntu.com bionic-proposed Release' is not 
signed.
  N: Updating from such a repository can't be done securely, and is therefore 
disabled by default.
  N: See apt-secure(8) manpage for repository creation and user configuration 
details.

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-keyring/+bug/1920640/+subscriptions

-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
Post to : touch-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


[Touch-packages] [Bug 1921423] [NEW] package sudo 1.8.31-1ubuntu1.2 failed to install/upgrade: o subprocesso instalado, do pacote sudo, o script post-installation retornou erro do status de saída 1

2021-03-25 Thread Alex Leandro Rosa
Public bug reported:

The privileges of my /etc/sudoers file is 220. I don't have any idea on
how it was changed, and I tried many different ways to chmod it and I
didn't get to do it, even booting from another media and trying to chmod
the file didn't work.

It's the main reason of the many errors that started happening when
updating this machine.

I can't stop this machine now, and I don't want to run the risk of
trying to use the installation software to try to repair it.

If you have any idea on how to chmod the file, I'll be grateful.

Best regards,

Alex Leandro Rosa

ProblemType: Package
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 20.04
Package: sudo 1.8.31-1ubuntu1.2
ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 5.4.0-70.78-generic 5.4.94
Uname: Linux 5.4.0-70-generic x86_64
ApportVersion: 2.20.11-0ubuntu27.16
Architecture: amd64
CasperMD5CheckResult: skip
Date: Thu Mar 25 15:00:47 2021
ErrorMessage: o subprocesso instalado, do pacote sudo, o script 
post-installation retornou erro do status de saída 1
InstallationDate: Installed on 2018-12-12 (833 days ago)
InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 18.04 LTS "Bionic Beaver" - Release amd64 (20180426)
Python3Details: /usr/bin/python3.8, Python 3.8.5, python3-minimal, 
3.8.2-0ubuntu2
PythonDetails: /usr/bin/python2.7, Python 2.7.18, python-is-python2, 2.7.17-4
RelatedPackageVersions:
 dpkg 1.19.7ubuntu3
 apt  2.0.4
SourcePackage: sudo
Title: package sudo 1.8.31-1ubuntu1.2 failed to install/upgrade: o subprocesso 
instalado, do pacote sudo, o script post-installation retornou erro do status 
de saída 1
UpgradeStatus: Upgraded to focal on 2020-09-30 (175 days ago)
VisudoCheck:
 /etc/sudoers: análise OK
 /etc/sudoers.d/README: análise OK
mtime.conffile..etc.sudoers: 2020-12-30T18:27:17.782421

** Affects: sudo (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New


** Tags: amd64 apport-package focal

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to sudo in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1921423

Title:
  package sudo 1.8.31-1ubuntu1.2 failed to install/upgrade: o
  subprocesso instalado, do pacote sudo, o script post-installation
  retornou erro do status de saída 1

Status in sudo package in Ubuntu:
  New

Bug description:
  The privileges of my /etc/sudoers file is 220. I don't have any idea
  on how it was changed, and I tried many different ways to chmod it and
  I didn't get to do it, even booting from another media and trying to
  chmod the file didn't work.

  It's the main reason of the many errors that started happening when
  updating this machine.

  I can't stop this machine now, and I don't want to run the risk of
  trying to use the installation software to try to repair it.

  If you have any idea on how to chmod the file, I'll be grateful.

  Best regards,

  Alex Leandro Rosa

  ProblemType: Package
  DistroRelease: Ubuntu 20.04
  Package: sudo 1.8.31-1ubuntu1.2
  ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 5.4.0-70.78-generic 5.4.94
  Uname: Linux 5.4.0-70-generic x86_64
  ApportVersion: 2.20.11-0ubuntu27.16
  Architecture: amd64
  CasperMD5CheckResult: skip
  Date: Thu Mar 25 15:00:47 2021
  ErrorMessage: o subprocesso instalado, do pacote sudo, o script 
post-installation retornou erro do status de saída 1
  InstallationDate: Installed on 2018-12-12 (833 days ago)
  InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 18.04 LTS "Bionic Beaver" - Release amd64 (20180426)
  Python3Details: /usr/bin/python3.8, Python 3.8.5, python3-minimal, 
3.8.2-0ubuntu2
  PythonDetails: /usr/bin/python2.7, Python 2.7.18, python-is-python2, 2.7.17-4
  RelatedPackageVersions:
   dpkg 1.19.7ubuntu3
   apt  2.0.4
  SourcePackage: sudo
  Title: package sudo 1.8.31-1ubuntu1.2 failed to install/upgrade: o 
subprocesso instalado, do pacote sudo, o script post-installation retornou erro 
do status de saída 1
  UpgradeStatus: Upgraded to focal on 2020-09-30 (175 days ago)
  VisudoCheck:
   /etc/sudoers: análise OK
   /etc/sudoers.d/README: análise OK
  mtime.conffile..etc.sudoers: 2020-12-30T18:27:17.782421

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/sudo/+bug/1921423/+subscriptions

-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
Post to : touch-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


[Touch-packages] [Bug 388605] Re: [MIR] rsyslog

2021-03-25 Thread Launchpad Bug Tracker
** Merge proposal linked:
   
https://code.launchpad.net/~ahasenack/ubuntu-seeds/+git/ubuntu-seeds/+merge/400218

** Merge proposal linked:
   
https://code.launchpad.net/~ahasenack/ubuntu-seeds/+git/ubuntu-seeds/+merge/400219

** Merge proposal linked:
   
https://code.launchpad.net/~ahasenack/ubuntu-seeds/+git/ubuntu-seeds/+merge/400220

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to rsyslog in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/388605

Title:
  [MIR] rsyslog

Status in rsyslog package in Ubuntu:
  Fix Released
Status in rsyslog source package in Bionic:
  New
Status in rsyslog source package in Focal:
  New
Status in rsyslog source package in Groovy:
  New
Status in rsyslog source package in Hirsute:
  Fix Released

Bug description:
  Binary package hint: rsyslog

  We want to make rsyslog the new default syslogger.

  See https://wiki.ubuntu.com/MainInclusionReport/rsyslog

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/rsyslog/+bug/388605/+subscriptions

-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
Post to : touch-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


[Touch-packages] [Bug 1871268] Re: Installation fails due to useless immediate configuration error when "Install Third-Party Drivers" is selected

2021-03-25 Thread Pedro Principeza
Hi.  Input from a customer:

[ . . . ]
I just tested a "do-release-upgrade" from bionic to focal and did not get any 
errors.

I installed 18.04, installed the nvidia-driver-418 and enabled i386 arch.  I 
then enable the
bionic-proposed repo and did an update/dist-upgrade, rebooted, and did a 
do-release-upgrade with no errors.
[ . . . ]

Changing tags.  Thanks!

** Tags removed: verification-needed-bionic
** Tags added: verification-done-bionic

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to apt in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1871268

Title:
  Installation fails due to useless immediate configuration error when
  "Install Third-Party Drivers" is selected

Status in Ubuntu CD Images:
  Fix Released
Status in apt package in Ubuntu:
  Fix Released
Status in apt source package in Bionic:
  Fix Committed
Status in apt source package in Focal:
  Fix Released
Status in apt source package in Groovy:
  Fix Released
Status in apt package in Debian:
  Fix Released

Bug description:
  [Impact]
  Installations that really succeeded would then fail because APT could not 
immediately configure a package. Which is a pointless way to fail at that 
point, because everything did work out anyway.

  We have two changes that help address this:

  * The first one stops immediately configuring multi-arch siblings
  (e.g. libc6:i386 when it's configuring libc6:amd64). This was not
  necessary, and caused all the libc6:i386 failures here.

  * The second change sort of also supersedes the first one: It just
  ignores any errors from immediate configuration, relying on the fact
  that it's checked and rectified at a later point if there are
  unconfigured packages (which is what made all those failures happen
  spuriously after having successfully installed everything).

  [Test case]
  We have one test case in EIPP format in the Debian bug 973305 which was only 
helped by the second change, not the first one. Run /usr/lib/apt/planners < 
eipp.log and check there are no errors.

  TODO: It's unclear if the APT from proposed installed in the live
  session will fix the installer, needs investigation, but would make a
  useful test case.

  [Regression potential]
  It's imaginable that we missed something somewhere and some path that checked 
for a set error doesn't check it anymore, and we report success when we hit an 
error, but it seems unlikely.

  Behavior of --simulate changes. This used to fail before as well, and
  will now only produce a warning. We don't believe that is a reason of
  concern.

  [Groovy SRU]
  The groovy SRU is a sync of the 2.1.11 micro release from Debian unstable 
which also incorporates changes to the documentation: A typo fix, replacing 
focal with groovy in examples, and minor Dutch manual pages translation updates.

  We do not have test cases for the documentation changes, and we do not
  consider there to be a huge regression potential. As long as they
  build, they should be readable - maybe some words are wrong in the
  translation, who knows.

  [Original bug report]
  Test Case
  1. Install Ubuntu Desktop on hardware with an nVidia card and select to 
install 3rd party drivers
  2. Proceed with installation

  The following error message is displayed in /var/log/syslog
  /plugininstall.py: Verifying downloads ...
  /plugininstall.py: Failed to find package object for 
/cdrom//pool/main/g/gcc-defaults/gcc_9.3.0-1ubuntu2_amd64.deb: "Version: 
'9.3.0-1ubuntu2' not found."
  /plugininstall.py: Failed to find package object for 
/cdrom//pool/main/libx/libxcrypt/libcrypt-dev_4.4.10-10ubuntu4_amd64.deb: 
"Version: '4.4.10-10ubuntu4' not found."
  /plugininstall.py: Failed to find package object for 
/cdrom//pool/main/g/gcc-defaults/g++_9.3.0-1ubuntu2_amd64.deb: "Version: 
'9.3.0-1ubuntu2' not found."
  /plugininstall.py: Failed to find package object for 
/cdrom//pool/main/z/zlib/zlib1g_1.2.11.dfsg-2ubuntu1_i386.deb: "Version: 
'1.2.11.dfsg-2ubuntu1' not found."
  /plugininstall.py: Failed to find package object for 
/cdrom//pool/main/libx/libxau/libxau6_1.0.9-0ubuntu1_i386.deb: "Version: 
'1.0.9-0ubuntu1' not found."
  /plugininstall.py: Failed to find package object for 
/cdrom//pool/main/libx/libxdmcp/libxdmcp6_1.1.3-0ubuntu1_i386.deb: "Version: 
'1.1.3-0ubuntu1' not found."
  /plugininstall.py: Failed to find package object for 
/cdrom//pool/main/libx/libx11/libx11-6_1.6.9-2ubuntu1_i386.deb: "Version: 
'1.6.9-2ubuntu1' not found."
  /plugininstall.py: Failed to find package object for 
/cdrom//pool/main/libx/libxext/libxext6_1.3.4-0ubuntu1_i386.deb: "Version: 
'1.3.4-0ubuntu1' not found."
  /plugininstall.py: Failed to find package object for 
/cdrom//pool/main/l/lm-sensors/libsensors5_3.6.0-2ubuntu1_i386.deb: "Version: 
'3.6.0-2ubuntu1' not found."
  /plugininstall.py: Failed to find package object for 
/cdrom//pool/main/libx/libx11/libx11-xcb1_1.6.9-2ubuntu1_i386.deb: "Version: 
'1.6.9-2ubuntu1' not found."
  

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1920640] Re: EXPKEYSIG C8CAB6595FDFF622 Ubuntu Debug Symbol Archive Automatic Signing Key (2016)

2021-03-25 Thread Dimitri John Ledkov
** Changed in: ubuntu-keyring (Ubuntu Focal)
   Status: Confirmed => In Progress

** Changed in: ubuntu-keyring (Ubuntu Bionic)
   Status: Confirmed => In Progress

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to ubuntu-keyring in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1920640

Title:
  EXPKEYSIG C8CAB6595FDFF622 Ubuntu Debug Symbol Archive Automatic
  Signing Key (2016) 

Status in ubuntu-keyring package in Ubuntu:
  Fix Released
Status in ubuntu-keyring source package in Bionic:
  In Progress
Status in ubuntu-keyring source package in Focal:
  In Progress
Status in ubuntu-keyring source package in Groovy:
  Fix Committed
Status in ubuntu-keyring source package in Hirsute:
  Fix Released

Bug description:
  [Impact]

   * Cannot update apt metadata from ddebs.ubuntu.com whilst using
  ubuntu-dbgsym-keyring package

  [Test Plan]

   * Install ubuntu-dbgsym-keyring package
   * Add ddebs.ubuntu.com repository for your release
   * sudo apt update must be successful

  [Where problems could occur]

   * At the moment the signature was bumped by one year
   * Meaning this issue will occur again in 2022
   * Instead the key must be set to not expire & new round of SRUs issued

  [Other Info]
   
   * Original bug report

  The public key used by the debugging symbols repository
  /usr/share/keyrings/ubuntu-dbgsym-keyring.gpg from the package ubuntu-
  dbgsym-keyring expired.

  $ apt policy ubuntu-dbgsym-keyring
  ubuntu-dbgsym-keyring:
    Installed: 2020.02.11.2
    Candidate: 2020.02.11.2
    Version table:
   *** 2020.02.11.2 500
  500 http://archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu focal/main amd64 Packages
  500 http://archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu focal/main i386 Packages
  100 /var/lib/dpkg/status
  $ gpg --no-default-keyring --keyring 
/usr/share/keyrings/ubuntu-dbgsym-keyring.gpg --list-keys
  /usr/share/keyrings/ubuntu-dbgsym-keyring.gpg
  -
  pub   rsa4096 2016-03-21 [SC] [expired: 2021-03-20]
    F2EDC64DC5AEE1F6B9C621F0C8CAB6595FDFF622
  uid   [ expired] Ubuntu Debug Symbol Archive Automatic Signing Key 
(2016) 

  Error message on "apt update":

  E: The repository 'http://ddebs.ubuntu.com bionic-updates Release' is not 
signed.
  N: Updating from such a repository can't be done securely, and is therefore 
disabled by default.
  N: See apt-secure(8) manpage for repository creation and user configuration 
details.
  W: GPG error: http://ddebs.ubuntu.com bionic Release: The following 
signatures were invalid: EXPKEYSIG C8CAB6595FDFF622 Ubuntu Debug Symbol Archive 
Automatic Signing Key (2016) 
  E: The repository 'http://ddebs.ubuntu.com bionic Release' is not signed.
  N: Updating from such a repository can't be done securely, and is therefore 
disabled by default.
  N: See apt-secure(8) manpage for repository creation and user configuration 
details.
  W: GPG error: http://ddebs.ubuntu.com bionic-proposed Release: The following 
signatures were invalid: EXPKEYSIG C8CAB6595FDFF622 Ubuntu Debug Symbol Archive 
Automatic Signing Key (2016) 
  E: The repository 'http://ddebs.ubuntu.com bionic-proposed Release' is not 
signed.
  N: Updating from such a repository can't be done securely, and is therefore 
disabled by default.
  N: See apt-secure(8) manpage for repository creation and user configuration 
details.

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-keyring/+bug/1920640/+subscriptions

-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
Post to : touch-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


[Touch-packages] [Bug 1920640] Re: EXPKEYSIG C8CAB6595FDFF622 Ubuntu Debug Symbol Archive Automatic Signing Key (2016)

2021-03-25 Thread Brian Murray
Hello Felipe, or anyone else affected,

Accepted ubuntu-keyring into groovy-proposed. The package will build now
and be available at https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-
keyring/2020.06.17.2 in a few hours, and then in the -proposed
repository.

Please help us by testing this new package.  See
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Testing/EnableProposed for documentation on how
to enable and use -proposed.  Your feedback will aid us getting this
update out to other Ubuntu users.

If this package fixes the bug for you, please add a comment to this bug,
mentioning the version of the package you tested, what testing has been
performed on the package and change the tag from verification-needed-
groovy to verification-done-groovy. If it does not fix the bug for you,
please add a comment stating that, and change the tag to verification-
failed-groovy. In either case, without details of your testing we will
not be able to proceed.

Further information regarding the verification process can be found at
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/QATeam/PerformingSRUVerification .  Thank you in
advance for helping!

N.B. The updated package will be released to -updates after the bug(s)
fixed by this package have been verified and the package has been in
-proposed for a minimum of 7 days.

** Changed in: ubuntu-keyring (Ubuntu Groovy)
   Status: In Progress => Fix Committed

** Tags added: verification-needed verification-needed-groovy

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to ubuntu-keyring in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1920640

Title:
  EXPKEYSIG C8CAB6595FDFF622 Ubuntu Debug Symbol Archive Automatic
  Signing Key (2016) 

Status in ubuntu-keyring package in Ubuntu:
  Fix Released
Status in ubuntu-keyring source package in Bionic:
  Confirmed
Status in ubuntu-keyring source package in Focal:
  Confirmed
Status in ubuntu-keyring source package in Groovy:
  Fix Committed
Status in ubuntu-keyring source package in Hirsute:
  Fix Released

Bug description:
  [Impact]

   * Cannot update apt metadata from ddebs.ubuntu.com whilst using
  ubuntu-dbgsym-keyring package

  [Test Plan]

   * Install ubuntu-dbgsym-keyring package
   * Add ddebs.ubuntu.com repository for your release
   * sudo apt update must be successful

  [Where problems could occur]

   * At the moment the signature was bumped by one year
   * Meaning this issue will occur again in 2022
   * Instead the key must be set to not expire & new round of SRUs issued

  [Other Info]
   
   * Original bug report

  The public key used by the debugging symbols repository
  /usr/share/keyrings/ubuntu-dbgsym-keyring.gpg from the package ubuntu-
  dbgsym-keyring expired.

  $ apt policy ubuntu-dbgsym-keyring
  ubuntu-dbgsym-keyring:
    Installed: 2020.02.11.2
    Candidate: 2020.02.11.2
    Version table:
   *** 2020.02.11.2 500
  500 http://archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu focal/main amd64 Packages
  500 http://archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu focal/main i386 Packages
  100 /var/lib/dpkg/status
  $ gpg --no-default-keyring --keyring 
/usr/share/keyrings/ubuntu-dbgsym-keyring.gpg --list-keys
  /usr/share/keyrings/ubuntu-dbgsym-keyring.gpg
  -
  pub   rsa4096 2016-03-21 [SC] [expired: 2021-03-20]
    F2EDC64DC5AEE1F6B9C621F0C8CAB6595FDFF622
  uid   [ expired] Ubuntu Debug Symbol Archive Automatic Signing Key 
(2016) 

  Error message on "apt update":

  E: The repository 'http://ddebs.ubuntu.com bionic-updates Release' is not 
signed.
  N: Updating from such a repository can't be done securely, and is therefore 
disabled by default.
  N: See apt-secure(8) manpage for repository creation and user configuration 
details.
  W: GPG error: http://ddebs.ubuntu.com bionic Release: The following 
signatures were invalid: EXPKEYSIG C8CAB6595FDFF622 Ubuntu Debug Symbol Archive 
Automatic Signing Key (2016) 
  E: The repository 'http://ddebs.ubuntu.com bionic Release' is not signed.
  N: Updating from such a repository can't be done securely, and is therefore 
disabled by default.
  N: See apt-secure(8) manpage for repository creation and user configuration 
details.
  W: GPG error: http://ddebs.ubuntu.com bionic-proposed Release: The following 
signatures were invalid: EXPKEYSIG C8CAB6595FDFF622 Ubuntu Debug Symbol Archive 
Automatic Signing Key (2016) 
  E: The repository 'http://ddebs.ubuntu.com bionic-proposed Release' is not 
signed.
  N: Updating from such a repository can't be done securely, and is therefore 
disabled by default.
  N: See apt-secure(8) manpage for repository creation and user configuration 
details.

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-keyring/+bug/1920640/+subscriptions

-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
Post to : touch-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
More help   : 

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1874824] Re: pgrep reports error "cannot allocate" when run without stack limit

2021-03-25 Thread Brian Murray
I've sponsored this for hirsute but changed the package version to not
include the release number as this isn't an SRU for hirsute.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to procps in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1874824

Title:
  pgrep reports error "cannot allocate" when run without stack limit

Status in procps package in Ubuntu:
  Fix Committed
Status in procps source package in Focal:
  In Progress
Status in procps source package in Groovy:
  In Progress
Status in procps source package in Hirsute:
  Fix Committed
Status in procps package in Debian:
  New

Bug description:
  [Impact]

- Users who have ulimit set high would see either slow
  or failed pgrep and pkill commands
- Users who have ulimit set to unlimited would see
  failed pgrep and pkill commands
- This bug occurs because the behavior of sysconf(_SC_ARG_MAX)
  changed with a newer version of the kernel.

  [Test Case]

- set the ulimit to unlimited by running `ulimit -S -s unlimited`
- run `pgrep bash` to see that the "cannot allocate" error is
   printed and the command has failed.

  [Where Problems Could Occur]

- We have set upper and lower limits on the size of the malloc, but
  if further kernel versions break the call to sysconf in
  unexpected ways we could still see problems.

  [Original Description]

  If you have no stack limit (ulimit -S -s unlimited), any pgrep call
  will fail with an error:

  > pgrep vim
  pgrep: cannot allocate 4611686018427387903 bytes

  If you have a high stack limit (e.g. ulimit -S -s 50), pgrep is
  very slow:

  > time pgrep vim
  2196
  real 8.48s user 8.40s syst 0.07s busy 99% rmem 253444

  The relevant upstream bug report could be: 
https://gitlab.com/procps-ng/procps/-/issues/152
  Archlinux bug report: https://bugs.archlinux.org/task/66093

  procps:
    Installed: 2:3.3.16-1ubuntu2
    500 http://archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu focal/main amd64 Packages

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/procps/+bug/1874824/+subscriptions

-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
Post to : touch-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


[Touch-packages] [Bug 388605] Re: [MIR] rsyslog

2021-03-25 Thread Andreas Hasenack
Meeting minutes: https://new.ubottu.com/meetingology/logs/ubuntu-
meeting/2021/ubuntu-meeting.2021-03-25-15.00.moin.txt

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to rsyslog in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/388605

Title:
  [MIR] rsyslog

Status in rsyslog package in Ubuntu:
  Fix Released
Status in rsyslog source package in Bionic:
  New
Status in rsyslog source package in Focal:
  New
Status in rsyslog source package in Groovy:
  New
Status in rsyslog source package in Hirsute:
  Fix Released

Bug description:
  Binary package hint: rsyslog

  We want to make rsyslog the new default syslogger.

  See https://wiki.ubuntu.com/MainInclusionReport/rsyslog

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/rsyslog/+bug/388605/+subscriptions

-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
Post to : touch-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


[Touch-packages] [Bug 1920640] Re: EXPKEYSIG C8CAB6595FDFF622 Ubuntu Debug Symbol Archive Automatic Signing Key (2016)

2021-03-25 Thread Dimitri John Ledkov
** Changed in: ubuntu-keyring (Ubuntu Groovy)
   Status: Confirmed => In Progress

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to ubuntu-keyring in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1920640

Title:
  EXPKEYSIG C8CAB6595FDFF622 Ubuntu Debug Symbol Archive Automatic
  Signing Key (2016) 

Status in ubuntu-keyring package in Ubuntu:
  Fix Released
Status in ubuntu-keyring source package in Bionic:
  Confirmed
Status in ubuntu-keyring source package in Focal:
  Confirmed
Status in ubuntu-keyring source package in Groovy:
  In Progress
Status in ubuntu-keyring source package in Hirsute:
  Fix Released

Bug description:
  [Impact]

   * Cannot update apt metadata from ddebs.ubuntu.com whilst using
  ubuntu-dbgsym-keyring package

  [Test Plan]

   * Install ubuntu-dbgsym-keyring package
   * Add ddebs.ubuntu.com repository for your release
   * sudo apt update must be successful

  [Where problems could occur]

   * At the moment the signature was bumped by one year
   * Meaning this issue will occur again in 2022
   * Instead the key must be set to not expire & new round of SRUs issued

  [Other Info]
   
   * Original bug report

  The public key used by the debugging symbols repository
  /usr/share/keyrings/ubuntu-dbgsym-keyring.gpg from the package ubuntu-
  dbgsym-keyring expired.

  $ apt policy ubuntu-dbgsym-keyring
  ubuntu-dbgsym-keyring:
    Installed: 2020.02.11.2
    Candidate: 2020.02.11.2
    Version table:
   *** 2020.02.11.2 500
  500 http://archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu focal/main amd64 Packages
  500 http://archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu focal/main i386 Packages
  100 /var/lib/dpkg/status
  $ gpg --no-default-keyring --keyring 
/usr/share/keyrings/ubuntu-dbgsym-keyring.gpg --list-keys
  /usr/share/keyrings/ubuntu-dbgsym-keyring.gpg
  -
  pub   rsa4096 2016-03-21 [SC] [expired: 2021-03-20]
    F2EDC64DC5AEE1F6B9C621F0C8CAB6595FDFF622
  uid   [ expired] Ubuntu Debug Symbol Archive Automatic Signing Key 
(2016) 

  Error message on "apt update":

  E: The repository 'http://ddebs.ubuntu.com bionic-updates Release' is not 
signed.
  N: Updating from such a repository can't be done securely, and is therefore 
disabled by default.
  N: See apt-secure(8) manpage for repository creation and user configuration 
details.
  W: GPG error: http://ddebs.ubuntu.com bionic Release: The following 
signatures were invalid: EXPKEYSIG C8CAB6595FDFF622 Ubuntu Debug Symbol Archive 
Automatic Signing Key (2016) 
  E: The repository 'http://ddebs.ubuntu.com bionic Release' is not signed.
  N: Updating from such a repository can't be done securely, and is therefore 
disabled by default.
  N: See apt-secure(8) manpage for repository creation and user configuration 
details.
  W: GPG error: http://ddebs.ubuntu.com bionic-proposed Release: The following 
signatures were invalid: EXPKEYSIG C8CAB6595FDFF622 Ubuntu Debug Symbol Archive 
Automatic Signing Key (2016) 
  E: The repository 'http://ddebs.ubuntu.com bionic-proposed Release' is not 
signed.
  N: Updating from such a repository can't be done securely, and is therefore 
disabled by default.
  N: See apt-secure(8) manpage for repository creation and user configuration 
details.

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-keyring/+bug/1920640/+subscriptions

-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
Post to : touch-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


[Touch-packages] [Bug 1920640] Re: EXPKEYSIG C8CAB6595FDFF622 Ubuntu Debug Symbol Archive Automatic Signing Key (2016)

2021-03-25 Thread Dimitri John Ledkov
** Description changed:

+ [Impact]
+ 
+  * Cannot update apt metadata from ddebs.ubuntu.com whilst using ubuntu-
+ dbgsym-keyring package
+ 
+ [Test Plan]
+ 
+  * Install ubuntu-dbgsym-keyring package
+  * Add ddebs.ubuntu.com repository for your release
+  * sudo apt update must be successful
+ 
+ [Where problems could occur]
+ 
+  * At the moment the signature was bumped by one year
+  * Meaning this issue will occur again in 2022
+  * Instead the key must be set to not expire & new round of SRUs issued
+ 
+ [Other Info]
+  
+  * Original bug report
+ 
  The public key used by the debugging symbols repository
  /usr/share/keyrings/ubuntu-dbgsym-keyring.gpg from the package ubuntu-
  dbgsym-keyring expired.
  
  $ apt policy ubuntu-dbgsym-keyring
  ubuntu-dbgsym-keyring:
    Installed: 2020.02.11.2
    Candidate: 2020.02.11.2
    Version table:
   *** 2020.02.11.2 500
  500 http://archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu focal/main amd64 Packages
  500 http://archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu focal/main i386 Packages
  100 /var/lib/dpkg/status
  $ gpg --no-default-keyring --keyring 
/usr/share/keyrings/ubuntu-dbgsym-keyring.gpg --list-keys
  /usr/share/keyrings/ubuntu-dbgsym-keyring.gpg
  -
  pub   rsa4096 2016-03-21 [SC] [expired: 2021-03-20]
    F2EDC64DC5AEE1F6B9C621F0C8CAB6595FDFF622
  uid   [ expired] Ubuntu Debug Symbol Archive Automatic Signing Key 
(2016) 
  
- 
  Error message on "apt update":
  
  E: The repository 'http://ddebs.ubuntu.com bionic-updates Release' is not 
signed.
  N: Updating from such a repository can't be done securely, and is therefore 
disabled by default.
  N: See apt-secure(8) manpage for repository creation and user configuration 
details.
  W: GPG error: http://ddebs.ubuntu.com bionic Release: The following 
signatures were invalid: EXPKEYSIG C8CAB6595FDFF622 Ubuntu Debug Symbol Archive 
Automatic Signing Key (2016) 
  E: The repository 'http://ddebs.ubuntu.com bionic Release' is not signed.
  N: Updating from such a repository can't be done securely, and is therefore 
disabled by default.
  N: See apt-secure(8) manpage for repository creation and user configuration 
details.
  W: GPG error: http://ddebs.ubuntu.com bionic-proposed Release: The following 
signatures were invalid: EXPKEYSIG C8CAB6595FDFF622 Ubuntu Debug Symbol Archive 
Automatic Signing Key (2016) 
  E: The repository 'http://ddebs.ubuntu.com bionic-proposed Release' is not 
signed.
  N: Updating from such a repository can't be done securely, and is therefore 
disabled by default.
  N: See apt-secure(8) manpage for repository creation and user configuration 
details.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to ubuntu-keyring in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1920640

Title:
  EXPKEYSIG C8CAB6595FDFF622 Ubuntu Debug Symbol Archive Automatic
  Signing Key (2016) 

Status in ubuntu-keyring package in Ubuntu:
  Fix Released
Status in ubuntu-keyring source package in Bionic:
  Confirmed
Status in ubuntu-keyring source package in Focal:
  Confirmed
Status in ubuntu-keyring source package in Groovy:
  Confirmed
Status in ubuntu-keyring source package in Hirsute:
  Fix Released

Bug description:
  [Impact]

   * Cannot update apt metadata from ddebs.ubuntu.com whilst using
  ubuntu-dbgsym-keyring package

  [Test Plan]

   * Install ubuntu-dbgsym-keyring package
   * Add ddebs.ubuntu.com repository for your release
   * sudo apt update must be successful

  [Where problems could occur]

   * At the moment the signature was bumped by one year
   * Meaning this issue will occur again in 2022
   * Instead the key must be set to not expire & new round of SRUs issued

  [Other Info]
   
   * Original bug report

  The public key used by the debugging symbols repository
  /usr/share/keyrings/ubuntu-dbgsym-keyring.gpg from the package ubuntu-
  dbgsym-keyring expired.

  $ apt policy ubuntu-dbgsym-keyring
  ubuntu-dbgsym-keyring:
    Installed: 2020.02.11.2
    Candidate: 2020.02.11.2
    Version table:
   *** 2020.02.11.2 500
  500 http://archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu focal/main amd64 Packages
  500 http://archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu focal/main i386 Packages
  100 /var/lib/dpkg/status
  $ gpg --no-default-keyring --keyring 
/usr/share/keyrings/ubuntu-dbgsym-keyring.gpg --list-keys
  /usr/share/keyrings/ubuntu-dbgsym-keyring.gpg
  -
  pub   rsa4096 2016-03-21 [SC] [expired: 2021-03-20]
    F2EDC64DC5AEE1F6B9C621F0C8CAB6595FDFF622
  uid   [ expired] Ubuntu Debug Symbol Archive Automatic Signing Key 
(2016) 

  Error message on "apt update":

  E: The repository 'http://ddebs.ubuntu.com bionic-updates Release' is not 
signed.
  N: Updating from such a repository can't be done securely, and is therefore 
disabled by default.
  N: See apt-secure(8) manpage for repository creation and user configuration 

[Touch-packages] [Bug 388605] Re: [MIR] rsyslog

2021-03-25 Thread Andreas Hasenack
I'll provide MPs for bionic, focal and groovy to change the seeds to
pull rsyslog-gnutls into main, as discussed in #ubuntu-meeting with
Foundations today, and then ping an archive admin.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to rsyslog in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/388605

Title:
  [MIR] rsyslog

Status in rsyslog package in Ubuntu:
  Fix Released
Status in rsyslog source package in Bionic:
  New
Status in rsyslog source package in Focal:
  New
Status in rsyslog source package in Groovy:
  New
Status in rsyslog source package in Hirsute:
  Fix Released

Bug description:
  Binary package hint: rsyslog

  We want to make rsyslog the new default syslogger.

  See https://wiki.ubuntu.com/MainInclusionReport/rsyslog

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/rsyslog/+bug/388605/+subscriptions

-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
Post to : touch-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


[Touch-packages] [Bug 1887744] Re: systemd dumps core on starting service: Assertion 'u->instance' failed at src/core/load-fragment.c:4798

2021-03-25 Thread Łukasz Zemczak
Ok, so this is still not something we have in hirsute? Do we know when
248 will be pulled in? Is it still something we plan for hirsute?

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to systemd in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1887744

Title:
  systemd dumps core on starting service: Assertion 'u->instance' failed
  at src/core/load-fragment.c:4798

Status in systemd:
  Fix Released
Status in systemd package in Ubuntu:
  In Progress
Status in systemd source package in Xenial:
  Invalid
Status in systemd source package in Bionic:
  Invalid
Status in systemd source package in Focal:
  In Progress
Status in systemd source package in Groovy:
  In Progress
Status in systemd source package in Hirsute:
  In Progress

Bug description:
  [impact]

  if a non-template service file is created as a symlink to a template
  service file outside the normal unit file paths, systemd will fail
  assertion and crash

  [test case]

  su -
  cat < /crashsystemd@.service
  [Unit]
  Description=Template for instance %i

  [Service]
  ExecStart=/bin/true
  EOF

  cd /etc/systemd/system
  ln -s /crashsystemd@.service crashsystemd.service
  systemctl daemon-reload
  systemctl start crashsystemd

  [regression potential]

  any regression would likely cause a failed assertion and crash, or
  failure to properly parse and/or load a service file that is a symlink

  [scope]

  this is needed in f/g/h

  this is fixed upstream by commit
  3aa57658434e7a95c6000bebb166c31f1c6d051b which is included in
  v248-rc1, so this is not fixed in any release yet

  this was introduced by the changes in commit e8630e69523 which was
  first included in v243, so this bug doesn't exist in b or earlier

  [original description]

  On an Ubuntu 20.04 server, when I started a newly installed systemd
  service 'systemctl start testemail2jira.service', systemd trips on an
  assertion (from journalctl):

  Jul 16 13:49:12 pangolin-jiraconf systemd[1]: Assertion 'u->instance' failed 
at src/core/load-fragment.c:4798, function unit_load_fragment(). Aborting.
  Jul 16 13:49:13 pangolin-jiraconf systemd[1]: Caught , dumped core as 
pid 2906637.
  Jul 16 13:49:13 pangolin-jiraconf systemd[1]: Freezing execution.

  apport generates a core dump which I trust is attached.

  The server still works, but my terminal keeps showing:

  Failed to get properties: Failed to activate service
  'org.freedesktop.systemd1': timed out (service_start_timeout=25000ms)

  and pauses for 25s after each command.

  In case it's relevant, the  i was trying to start had just
  been symlinked into /etc/systemd/system/:

  root@pangolin-jiraconf # ls -la /etc/systemd/system/testemail2jira.service
  lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 82 Jul 16 13:48 
/etc/systemd/system/testemail2jira.service -> 
/opt/atlassian/jira/current/emailprocessing/testemail2jira/testemail2jira@.service

  File contents:

  [Unit]
  Description=Check that email to %i JIRA works

  [Service]
  #Type=oneshot
  # Note: I keep the config file, testemail2jira.json5 and rsa.* files in 
emailprocessing/, one directory below testemail2jira/, so that they can be 
version-controlled independently.
  # If you want testemail2jira.json5 and rsa.* within testemail2jira/, then add 
testemail2jira/ to WorkingDirectory and remove it from the ExecStart command
  WorkingDirectory=/opt/atlassian/%i/current/emailprocessing
  
ExecStart=/opt/atlassian/%i/current/emailprocessing/testemail2jira/venv/bin/python
 testemail2jira/testemail2jira.py
  User=root

  [Install]
  WantedBy=multi-user.target

  Perhaps the problem is that my service file is a template
  (testemail2jira@.service), but I symlinked it as a regular
  'testemail2jira.service'.

  ProblemType: Bug
  DistroRelease: Ubuntu 20.04
  Package: systemd 245.4-4ubuntu3.1
  ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 5.4.0-39.43-generic 5.4.41
  Uname: Linux 5.4.0-39-generic x86_64
  NonfreeKernelModules: zfs zunicode zavl icp zcommon znvpair
  ApportVersion: 2.20.11-0ubuntu27.3
  Architecture: amd64
  CasperMD5CheckResult: skip
  Date: Thu Jul 16 14:13:06 2020
  InstallationDate: Installed on 2020-05-27 (49 days ago)
  InstallationMedia: Ubuntu-Server 20.04 LTS "Focal Fossa" - Release amd64 
(20200423)
  Lsusb: Error: command ['lsusb'] failed with exit code 1:
  Lsusb-t:

  Lsusb-v: Error: command ['lsusb', '-v'] failed with exit code 1:
  MachineType: QEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009)
  ProcKernelCmdLine: BOOT_IMAGE=/boot/vmlinuz-5.4.0-39-generic root=/dev/sda ro 
console=ttyS0,19200n8 net.ifnames=0
  SourcePackage: systemd
  SystemdFailedUnits: Error: command ['systemctl', 'status', '--full', 
'Error:'] failed with exit code 1: Failed to get properties: Failed to activate 
service 'org.freedesktop.systemd1': timed out (service_start_timeout=25000ms)
  UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install)
  dmi.bios.date: 04/01/2014
  dmi.bios.vendor: SeaBIOS
  dmi.bios.version: 

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1921350] Re: UFW hangs indefinitely on any action

2021-03-25 Thread Daniel Sjöblom
Jamie: after installing some other things on the server, the problem no
longer exists, so I can't answer the question, unfortunately, nor can I
reproduce this issue. I would say that other ufw commands were not
running because UFW was called via Ansible, but it is not impossible.
Terminating the script did not fix the issue.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to ufw in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1921350

Title:
  UFW hangs indefinitely on any action

Status in ufw package in Ubuntu:
  Incomplete

Bug description:
  When installing a new cloudserver (on Amazon EC2, if it makes a
  difference), UFW completely hangs on any command, for example ufw
  status. Interrupting it with Ctrl+C yields this backtrace:

  Traceback (most recent call last):
File "/usr/sbin/ufw", line 130, in 
  lock = create_lock(lockfile=lockfile, dryrun=pr.dryrun)
File "/usr/lib/python3/dist-packages/ufw/util.py", line 1112, in create_lock
  fcntl.lockf(lock, fcntl.LOCK_EX)
  KeyboardInterrupt

  The line numbers are always the same.

  The platform is Ubuntu Server 20.04 (Ubuntu 20.04.2 LTS), from the
  Amazon image. I have not seen this bug on other servers. UFW is
  version 0.36.

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ufw/+bug/1921350/+subscriptions

-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
Post to : touch-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


[Touch-packages] [Bug 388605] Re: [MIR] rsyslog

2021-03-25 Thread Łukasz Zemczak
$ change-override -s hirsute -c main rsyslog-gnutls
Override component to main
rsyslog-gnutls 8.2102.0-2ubuntu1 in hirsute amd64: universe/admin/extra/100% -> 
main
rsyslog-gnutls 8.2102.0-2ubuntu1 in hirsute arm64: universe/admin/extra/100% -> 
main
rsyslog-gnutls 8.2102.0-2ubuntu1 in hirsute armhf: universe/admin/extra/100% -> 
main
rsyslog-gnutls 8.2102.0-2ubuntu1 in hirsute ppc64el: universe/admin/extra/100% 
-> main
rsyslog-gnutls 8.2102.0-2ubuntu1 in hirsute riscv64: universe/admin/extra/100% 
-> main
rsyslog-gnutls 8.2102.0-2ubuntu1 in hirsute s390x: universe/admin/extra/100% -> 
main
Override [y|N]? y
6 publications overridden.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to rsyslog in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/388605

Title:
  [MIR] rsyslog

Status in rsyslog package in Ubuntu:
  Fix Released
Status in rsyslog source package in Bionic:
  New
Status in rsyslog source package in Focal:
  New
Status in rsyslog source package in Groovy:
  New
Status in rsyslog source package in Hirsute:
  Fix Released

Bug description:
  Binary package hint: rsyslog

  We want to make rsyslog the new default syslogger.

  See https://wiki.ubuntu.com/MainInclusionReport/rsyslog

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/rsyslog/+bug/388605/+subscriptions

-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
Post to : touch-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


[Touch-packages] [Bug 1904213] Re: Built-in microphone not working with 20.04 on ThinkBook 13s IML [Realtek ALC257]

2021-03-25 Thread Bug Watch Updater
** Changed in: sound-2.6
   Status: Unknown => New

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to alsa-driver in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1904213

Title:
  Built-in microphone not working with 20.04 on ThinkBook 13s IML
  [Realtek ALC257]

Status in sound-2.6 (alsa-kernel):
  New
Status in alsa-driver package in Ubuntu:
  Confirmed

Bug description:
  After installing current 20.04 release on ThinkBook 13s IML with Intel
  audio card built-in microphone is not working - I'm unable to record
  anything.

  I could confirm that it was working in Windows 10 (previously
  installed on that laptop), and when I'm using headphones their
  microphone is working fine.

  ProblemType: Bug
  DistroRelease: Ubuntu 20.04
  Package: alsa-base 1.0.25+dfsg-0ubuntu5
  ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 5.4.0-53.59-generic 5.4.65
  Uname: Linux 5.4.0-53-generic x86_64
  ApportVersion: 2.20.11-0ubuntu27.12
  Architecture: amd64
  AudioDevicesInUse:
   USERPID ACCESS COMMAND
   /dev/snd/controlC0:  anlar  1496 F pulseaudio
  CasperMD5CheckResult: skip
  CurrentDesktop: ubuntu:GNOME
  Date: Fri Nov 13 19:07:34 2020
  InstallationDate: Installed on 2020-10-29 (14 days ago)
  InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 20.04.1 LTS "Focal Fossa" - Release amd64 (20200731)
  PackageArchitecture: all
  SourcePackage: alsa-driver
  Symptom: audio
  Symptom_AlsaRecordingTest: ALSA recording test through plughw:sofhdadsp failed
  Symptom_Card: sof-hda-dsp - sof-hda-dsp
  Symptom_Jack: Black Mic, Right
  Symptom_Type: Only some of inputs are working
  Title: [20RR, Realtek ALC257, Black Mic, Right] Recording problem
  UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install)
  dmi.bios.date: 10/29/2019
  dmi.bios.vendor: LENOVO
  dmi.bios.version: CQCN24WW
  dmi.board.asset.tag: No Asset Tag
  dmi.board.name: LNVNB161216
  dmi.board.vendor: LENOVO
  dmi.board.version: SDK0J40697WIN
  dmi.chassis.asset.tag: No Asset Tag
  dmi.chassis.type: 10
  dmi.chassis.vendor: LENOVO
  dmi.chassis.version: Lenovo ThinkBook 13s-IML
  dmi.modalias: 
dmi:bvnLENOVO:bvrCQCN24WW:bd10/29/2019:svnLENOVO:pn20RR:pvrLenovoThinkBook13s-IML:rvnLENOVO:rnLNVNB161216:rvrSDK0J40697WIN:cvnLENOVO:ct10:cvrLenovoThinkBook13s-IML:
  dmi.product.family: ThinkBook 13s-IML
  dmi.product.name: 20RR
  dmi.product.sku: LENOVO_MT_20RR_BU_idea_FM_ThinkBook 13s-IML
  dmi.product.version: Lenovo ThinkBook 13s-IML
  dmi.sys.vendor: LENOVO

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/sound-2.6/+bug/1904213/+subscriptions

-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
Post to : touch-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


[Touch-packages] [Bug 1904213] Re: Built-in microphone not working with 20.04 on ThinkBook 13s IML [Realtek ALC257]

2021-03-25 Thread Thibaut Lunet
Temporary solution fixed the issue on my laptop, thanks !

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to alsa-driver in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1904213

Title:
  Built-in microphone not working with 20.04 on ThinkBook 13s IML
  [Realtek ALC257]

Status in sound-2.6 (alsa-kernel):
  New
Status in alsa-driver package in Ubuntu:
  Confirmed

Bug description:
  After installing current 20.04 release on ThinkBook 13s IML with Intel
  audio card built-in microphone is not working - I'm unable to record
  anything.

  I could confirm that it was working in Windows 10 (previously
  installed on that laptop), and when I'm using headphones their
  microphone is working fine.

  ProblemType: Bug
  DistroRelease: Ubuntu 20.04
  Package: alsa-base 1.0.25+dfsg-0ubuntu5
  ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 5.4.0-53.59-generic 5.4.65
  Uname: Linux 5.4.0-53-generic x86_64
  ApportVersion: 2.20.11-0ubuntu27.12
  Architecture: amd64
  AudioDevicesInUse:
   USERPID ACCESS COMMAND
   /dev/snd/controlC0:  anlar  1496 F pulseaudio
  CasperMD5CheckResult: skip
  CurrentDesktop: ubuntu:GNOME
  Date: Fri Nov 13 19:07:34 2020
  InstallationDate: Installed on 2020-10-29 (14 days ago)
  InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 20.04.1 LTS "Focal Fossa" - Release amd64 (20200731)
  PackageArchitecture: all
  SourcePackage: alsa-driver
  Symptom: audio
  Symptom_AlsaRecordingTest: ALSA recording test through plughw:sofhdadsp failed
  Symptom_Card: sof-hda-dsp - sof-hda-dsp
  Symptom_Jack: Black Mic, Right
  Symptom_Type: Only some of inputs are working
  Title: [20RR, Realtek ALC257, Black Mic, Right] Recording problem
  UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install)
  dmi.bios.date: 10/29/2019
  dmi.bios.vendor: LENOVO
  dmi.bios.version: CQCN24WW
  dmi.board.asset.tag: No Asset Tag
  dmi.board.name: LNVNB161216
  dmi.board.vendor: LENOVO
  dmi.board.version: SDK0J40697WIN
  dmi.chassis.asset.tag: No Asset Tag
  dmi.chassis.type: 10
  dmi.chassis.vendor: LENOVO
  dmi.chassis.version: Lenovo ThinkBook 13s-IML
  dmi.modalias: 
dmi:bvnLENOVO:bvrCQCN24WW:bd10/29/2019:svnLENOVO:pn20RR:pvrLenovoThinkBook13s-IML:rvnLENOVO:rnLNVNB161216:rvrSDK0J40697WIN:cvnLENOVO:ct10:cvrLenovoThinkBook13s-IML:
  dmi.product.family: ThinkBook 13s-IML
  dmi.product.name: 20RR
  dmi.product.sku: LENOVO_MT_20RR_BU_idea_FM_ThinkBook 13s-IML
  dmi.product.version: Lenovo ThinkBook 13s-IML
  dmi.sys.vendor: LENOVO

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/sound-2.6/+bug/1904213/+subscriptions

-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
Post to : touch-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


[Touch-packages] [Bug 1904213] Re: Built-in microphone not working with 20.04 on ThinkBook 13s IML [Realtek ALC257]

2021-03-25 Thread Thibaut Lunet
Correction : had y headphone microphone plugged in, so temporary
solution does not work yet actually

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to alsa-driver in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1904213

Title:
  Built-in microphone not working with 20.04 on ThinkBook 13s IML
  [Realtek ALC257]

Status in sound-2.6 (alsa-kernel):
  New
Status in alsa-driver package in Ubuntu:
  Confirmed

Bug description:
  After installing current 20.04 release on ThinkBook 13s IML with Intel
  audio card built-in microphone is not working - I'm unable to record
  anything.

  I could confirm that it was working in Windows 10 (previously
  installed on that laptop), and when I'm using headphones their
  microphone is working fine.

  ProblemType: Bug
  DistroRelease: Ubuntu 20.04
  Package: alsa-base 1.0.25+dfsg-0ubuntu5
  ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 5.4.0-53.59-generic 5.4.65
  Uname: Linux 5.4.0-53-generic x86_64
  ApportVersion: 2.20.11-0ubuntu27.12
  Architecture: amd64
  AudioDevicesInUse:
   USERPID ACCESS COMMAND
   /dev/snd/controlC0:  anlar  1496 F pulseaudio
  CasperMD5CheckResult: skip
  CurrentDesktop: ubuntu:GNOME
  Date: Fri Nov 13 19:07:34 2020
  InstallationDate: Installed on 2020-10-29 (14 days ago)
  InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 20.04.1 LTS "Focal Fossa" - Release amd64 (20200731)
  PackageArchitecture: all
  SourcePackage: alsa-driver
  Symptom: audio
  Symptom_AlsaRecordingTest: ALSA recording test through plughw:sofhdadsp failed
  Symptom_Card: sof-hda-dsp - sof-hda-dsp
  Symptom_Jack: Black Mic, Right
  Symptom_Type: Only some of inputs are working
  Title: [20RR, Realtek ALC257, Black Mic, Right] Recording problem
  UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install)
  dmi.bios.date: 10/29/2019
  dmi.bios.vendor: LENOVO
  dmi.bios.version: CQCN24WW
  dmi.board.asset.tag: No Asset Tag
  dmi.board.name: LNVNB161216
  dmi.board.vendor: LENOVO
  dmi.board.version: SDK0J40697WIN
  dmi.chassis.asset.tag: No Asset Tag
  dmi.chassis.type: 10
  dmi.chassis.vendor: LENOVO
  dmi.chassis.version: Lenovo ThinkBook 13s-IML
  dmi.modalias: 
dmi:bvnLENOVO:bvrCQCN24WW:bd10/29/2019:svnLENOVO:pn20RR:pvrLenovoThinkBook13s-IML:rvnLENOVO:rnLNVNB161216:rvrSDK0J40697WIN:cvnLENOVO:ct10:cvrLenovoThinkBook13s-IML:
  dmi.product.family: ThinkBook 13s-IML
  dmi.product.name: 20RR
  dmi.product.sku: LENOVO_MT_20RR_BU_idea_FM_ThinkBook 13s-IML
  dmi.product.version: Lenovo ThinkBook 13s-IML
  dmi.sys.vendor: LENOVO

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/sound-2.6/+bug/1904213/+subscriptions

-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
Post to : touch-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


[Touch-packages] [Bug 1615381] Re: apt-get autoremove may remove current kernel

2021-03-25 Thread Łukasz Zemczak
Hello Jarno, or anyone else affected,

Accepted apt into bionic-proposed. The package will build now and be
available at https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/apt/1.6.13 in a few
hours, and then in the -proposed repository.

Please help us by testing this new package.  See
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Testing/EnableProposed for documentation on how
to enable and use -proposed.  Your feedback will aid us getting this
update out to other Ubuntu users.

If this package fixes the bug for you, please add a comment to this bug,
mentioning the version of the package you tested, what testing has been
performed on the package and change the tag from verification-needed-
bionic to verification-done-bionic. If it does not fix the bug for you,
please add a comment stating that, and change the tag to verification-
failed-bionic. In either case, without details of your testing we will
not be able to proceed.

Further information regarding the verification process can be found at
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/QATeam/PerformingSRUVerification .  Thank you in
advance for helping!

N.B. The updated package will be released to -updates after the bug(s)
fixed by this package have been verified and the package has been in
-proposed for a minimum of 7 days.

** Changed in: apt (Ubuntu Bionic)
   Status: Confirmed => Fix Committed

** Tags added: verification-needed-bionic

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to unattended-upgrades in
Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1615381

Title:
  apt-get autoremove may remove current kernel

Status in apt package in Ubuntu:
  Fix Released
Status in unattended-upgrades package in Ubuntu:
  Fix Released
Status in unattended-upgrades source package in Trusty:
  Won't Fix
Status in unattended-upgrades source package in Xenial:
  Fix Released
Status in unattended-upgrades source package in Artful:
  Won't Fix
Status in apt source package in Bionic:
  Fix Committed
Status in apt source package in Focal:
  Fix Committed
Status in apt source package in Groovy:
  Fix Committed
Status in apt source package in Hirsute:
  Fix Released

Bug description:
  [Impact]
  APT will try and fail to remove the currently running kernel, when booted 
into an older kernel that is not protected. May wreak some havoc if mixed with 
other operations to the point that apt goes weird and needs manual fixing up.

  [Test case]
  For the SRUs we have included an automated test case that starts with an 
empty autoremove config file, and then checks that the running kernel is 
protected at runtime.

  You can also test manually, but it's not necessary:

  - Install new kernel
  - Reboot into kernel not listed as protected in 01autoremove-kernels
  - Run autoremove

  [Where problems could occur]
  We may more easily run out of space in /boot. hirsute has new autoremoval 
code that runs completely at runtime; but that seems a bit large to SRU after 
only a few weeks in hirsute. Hence, we should protect the current kernel _in 
addition_ to the other kernels, just like unattended-upgrades and 
update-manager do. This increases the risk of filling up /boot compared to 
older apt versions, but is at the same level as unattended-upgrades and 
update-manager.

  [Original bug report]

  This may happen, if you boot one of the older kernels, that is not
  protected by /etc/apt/apt.conf.d/01autoremove-kernels

  Workaround: run
  /etc/kernel/postinst.d/apt-auto-removal
  during each boot (e.g. by using cron).
  Note: The workaround breaks autoremoving feature of new unneeded kernels in  
unattended-upgrades i.e. the setting 
'Unattended-Upgrade::Remove-New-Unused-Dependencies "true"' (which is default 
in 16.04 unless 'Unattended-Upgrade::Remove-Unused-Dependencies "true"' is set 
in '/etc/apt/apt.conf.d/50unattended-upgrades'.

  In shell:

  $ uname -r
  4.4.0-22-generic
  $ apt-get -s autoremove
  NOTE: This is only a simulation!
    apt-get needs root privileges for real execution.
    Keep also in mind that locking is deactivated,
    so don't depend on the relevance to the real current situation!
  Reading package lists... Done
  Building dependency tree
  Reading state information... Done
  The following packages will be REMOVED:
    linux-headers-4.4.0-21 linux-headers-4.4.0-21-generic linux-headers-4.4.0-22
    linux-headers-4.4.0-22-generic linux-headers-4.4.0-31-generic
    linux-image-4.4.0-21-generic linux-image-4.4.0-22-generic
    linux-image-4.4.0-31-generic linux-image-extra-4.4.0-21-generic
    linux-image-extra-4.4.0-22-generic linux-image-extra-4.4.0-31-generic
  0 upgraded, 0 newly installed, 11 to remove and 13 not upgraded.

  ProblemType: Bug
  DistroRelease: Ubuntu 16.04
  Package: apt 1.2.12~ubuntu16.04.1
  ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 4.4.0-22.40-generic 4.4.8
  Uname: Linux 4.4.0-22-generic x86_64
  ApportVersion: 2.20.1-0ubuntu2.1
  Architecture: amd64
  CurrentDesktop: XFCE
  Date: Sun Aug 21 16:11:27 2016
  

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1693900] Re: apt-get update should return exit code != 0 on error

2021-03-25 Thread Łukasz Zemczak
Hello Jens, or anyone else affected,

Accepted apt into bionic-proposed. The package will build now and be
available at https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/apt/1.6.13 in a few
hours, and then in the -proposed repository.

Please help us by testing this new package.  See
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Testing/EnableProposed for documentation on how
to enable and use -proposed.  Your feedback will aid us getting this
update out to other Ubuntu users.

If this package fixes the bug for you, please add a comment to this bug,
mentioning the version of the package you tested, what testing has been
performed on the package and change the tag from verification-needed-
bionic to verification-done-bionic. If it does not fix the bug for you,
please add a comment stating that, and change the tag to verification-
failed-bionic. In either case, without details of your testing we will
not be able to proceed.

Further information regarding the verification process can be found at
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/QATeam/PerformingSRUVerification .  Thank you in
advance for helping!

N.B. The updated package will be released to -updates after the bug(s)
fixed by this package have been verified and the package has been in
-proposed for a minimum of 7 days.

** Changed in: apt (Ubuntu Bionic)
   Status: Triaged => Fix Committed

** Tags added: verification-needed-bionic

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to apt in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1693900

Title:
  apt-get update should return exit code != 0 on error

Status in apt package in Ubuntu:
  Fix Released
Status in apt source package in Xenial:
  New
Status in apt source package in Bionic:
  Fix Committed
Status in apt source package in Focal:
  Fix Committed
Status in apt source package in Groovy:
  Fix Committed

Bug description:
  [Impact]
  There is no way for scripts to run apt update and be sure that it was 
entirely successful.

  We introduce a new flag, --error-mode=any that makes apt update also
  error out on transient errors.

  [Test plan]
  We have included a test in the test-suite in 
test-apt-update-failure-propagation that ensures that warnings become errors.

  [Where problems could occur]
  If there's an issue some warnings for transient errors could become errors, 
or worse I suppose it's possible but unlikely for errors to be reported as 
warnings...

  Since the new behavior is behind a flag, regression potential for
  existing scripts is low if there is no bug.

  [Original bug report]

  When running 'apt-get update' (e.g. on a container install post-
  install script), apt-get return with exit code 0, even so it wasn't
  able to "update" properly. E.g.:

  + apt-get update
  Err:1 http://de.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu xenial InRelease
    Temporary failure resolving 'de.archive.ubuntu.com'
  Err:2 http://security.ubuntu.com/ubuntu xenial-security InRelease
    Temporary failure resolving 'security.ubuntu.com'
  Err:3 http://de.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu xenial-updates InRelease
    Temporary failure resolving 'de.archive.ubuntu.com'
  Reading package lists... Done
  W: Failed to fetch http://de.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/dists/xenial/InRelease 
 Temporary failure resolving 'de.archive.ubuntu.com'
  W: Failed to fetch 
http://de.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/dists/xenial-updates/InRelease  Temporary 
failure resolving 'de.archive.ubuntu.com'
  W: Failed to fetch 
http://security.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/dists/xenial-security/InRelease  Temporary 
failure resolving 'security.ubuntu.com'
  W: Some index files failed to download. They have been ignored, or old ones 
used instead.

  It should be corrected to return useful exit code, so that scripts can
  take the appropriate actions ...

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/apt/+bug/1693900/+subscriptions

-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
Post to : touch-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


[Touch-packages] [Bug 1806076] Re: unattended-upgrade --help raises UnicodeEncodeError when stdout encoding is ascii

2021-03-25 Thread Łukasz Zemczak
Hello errors.ubuntu.com, or anyone else affected,

Accepted apt into bionic-proposed. The package will build now and be
available at https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/apt/1.6.13 in a few
hours, and then in the -proposed repository.

Please help us by testing this new package.  See
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Testing/EnableProposed for documentation on how
to enable and use -proposed.  Your feedback will aid us getting this
update out to other Ubuntu users.

If this package fixes the bug for you, please add a comment to this bug,
mentioning the version of the package you tested, what testing has been
performed on the package and change the tag from verification-needed-
bionic to verification-done-bionic. If it does not fix the bug for you,
please add a comment stating that, and change the tag to verification-
failed-bionic. In either case, without details of your testing we will
not be able to proceed.

Further information regarding the verification process can be found at
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/QATeam/PerformingSRUVerification .  Thank you in
advance for helping!

N.B. The updated package will be released to -updates after the bug(s)
fixed by this package have been verified and the package has been in
-proposed for a minimum of 7 days.

** Changed in: apt (Ubuntu Bionic)
   Status: Triaged => Fix Committed

** Tags added: verification-needed verification-needed-bionic

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to apt in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1806076

Title:
  unattended-upgrade --help raises UnicodeEncodeError when stdout
  encoding is ascii

Status in apt package in Ubuntu:
  Fix Released
Status in unattended-upgrades package in Ubuntu:
  Won't Fix
Status in apt source package in Xenial:
  New
Status in unattended-upgrades source package in Xenial:
  Won't Fix
Status in apt source package in Bionic:
  Fix Committed
Status in unattended-upgrades source package in Bionic:
  Won't Fix

Bug description:
  [Impact]

   * unattended-upgrades --help crashes in apt.systemd.daily script when
  locale is not in UTF-8.

  [Test Case]

  In the fixed case no crash is observed.

  rbalint@yogi:~$ lxc launch ubuntu:18.04 bb-lp-1806076
  Creating bb-lp-1806076
  Starting bb-lp-1806076
  rbalint@yogi:~$ lxc shell bb-lp-1806076
  mesg: ttyname failed: No such device
  root@bb-lp-1806076:~# apt install -yqq language-pack-ru-base
  The following package was automatically installed and is no longer required:
    libfreetype6
  Use 'apt autoremove' to remove it.
  The following additional packages will be installed:
    language-pack-ru
  The following NEW packages will be installed:
    language-pack-ru language-pack-ru-base
  0 upgraded, 2 newly installed, 0 to remove and 7 not upgraded.
  Need to get 2310 kB of archives.
  After this operation, 11.8 MB of additional disk space will be used.
  Selecting previously unselected package language-pack-ru-base.
  (Reading database ... 28536 files and directories currently installed.)
  Preparing to unpack .../language-pack-ru-base_1%3a18.04+20180712_all.deb ...
  Unpacking language-pack-ru-base (1:18.04+20180712) ...
  Selecting previously unselected package language-pack-ru.
  Preparing to unpack .../language-pack-ru_1%3a18.04+20180712_all.deb ...
  Unpacking language-pack-ru (1:18.04+20180712) ...
  Setting up language-pack-ru (1:18.04+20180712) ...
  Setting up language-pack-ru-base (1:18.04+20180712) ...
  Generating locales (this might take a while)...
    ru_RU.UTF-8... done
    ru_UA.UTF-8... done
  Generation complete.

  root@bb-lp-1806076:~# echo LANG=ru_RU | tee /etc/default/locale 
  LANG=ru_RU
  root@bb-lp-1806076:~#
  /usr/lib/apt/apt.systemd.daily update
  Traceback (most recent call last):
File "/usr/bin/unattended-upgrade", line 2171, in 
  (options, args) = parser.parse_args()  # type: ignore
File "/usr/lib/python3.6/optparse.py", line 1387, in parse_args
  stop = self._process_args(largs, rargs, values)
File "/usr/lib/python3.6/optparse.py", line 1427, in _process_args
  self._process_long_opt(rargs, values)
File "/usr/lib/python3.6/optparse.py", line 1501, in _process_long_opt
  option.process(opt, value, values, self)
File "/usr/lib/python3.6/optparse.py", line 785, in process
  self.action, self.dest, opt, value, values, parser)
File "/usr/lib/python3.6/optparse.py", line 807, in take_action
  parser.print_help()
File "/usr/lib/python3.6/optparse.py", line 1647, in print_help
  file.write(self.format_help())
  UnicodeEncodeError: 'ascii' codec can't encode characters in position 
126-133: ordinal not in range(128)

  root@bb-lp-1806076:~# echo LANG=ru_RU.UTF-8 | tee /etc/default/locale 
  LANG=ru_RU.UTF-8
  root@bb-lp-1806076:~# /usr/lib/apt/apt.systemd.daily update
  root@bb-lp-1806076:~#

  [Where problems could occur]

  * Nowhere, really. The fix is setting LC_ALL=C.UFT-8 for u-u --help
  and it is 

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1871268] Re: Installation fails due to useless immediate configuration error when "Install Third-Party Drivers" is selected

2021-03-25 Thread Łukasz Zemczak
Hello andresgenovez, or anyone else affected,

Accepted apt into bionic-proposed. The package will build now and be
available at https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/apt/1.6.13 in a few
hours, and then in the -proposed repository.

Please help us by testing this new package.  See
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Testing/EnableProposed for documentation on how
to enable and use -proposed.  Your feedback will aid us getting this
update out to other Ubuntu users.

If this package fixes the bug for you, please add a comment to this bug,
mentioning the version of the package you tested, what testing has been
performed on the package and change the tag from verification-needed-
bionic to verification-done-bionic. If it does not fix the bug for you,
please add a comment stating that, and change the tag to verification-
failed-bionic. In either case, without details of your testing we will
not be able to proceed.

Further information regarding the verification process can be found at
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/QATeam/PerformingSRUVerification .  Thank you in
advance for helping!

N.B. The updated package will be released to -updates after the bug(s)
fixed by this package have been verified and the package has been in
-proposed for a minimum of 7 days.

** Changed in: apt (Ubuntu Bionic)
   Status: Triaged => Fix Committed

** Tags removed: verification-done
** Tags added: verification-needed verification-needed-bionic

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to apt in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1871268

Title:
  Installation fails due to useless immediate configuration error when
  "Install Third-Party Drivers" is selected

Status in Ubuntu CD Images:
  Fix Released
Status in apt package in Ubuntu:
  Fix Released
Status in apt source package in Bionic:
  Fix Committed
Status in apt source package in Focal:
  Fix Released
Status in apt source package in Groovy:
  Fix Released
Status in apt package in Debian:
  Fix Released

Bug description:
  [Impact]
  Installations that really succeeded would then fail because APT could not 
immediately configure a package. Which is a pointless way to fail at that 
point, because everything did work out anyway.

  We have two changes that help address this:

  * The first one stops immediately configuring multi-arch siblings
  (e.g. libc6:i386 when it's configuring libc6:amd64). This was not
  necessary, and caused all the libc6:i386 failures here.

  * The second change sort of also supersedes the first one: It just
  ignores any errors from immediate configuration, relying on the fact
  that it's checked and rectified at a later point if there are
  unconfigured packages (which is what made all those failures happen
  spuriously after having successfully installed everything).

  [Test case]
  We have one test case in EIPP format in the Debian bug 973305 which was only 
helped by the second change, not the first one. Run /usr/lib/apt/planners < 
eipp.log and check there are no errors.

  TODO: It's unclear if the APT from proposed installed in the live
  session will fix the installer, needs investigation, but would make a
  useful test case.

  [Regression potential]
  It's imaginable that we missed something somewhere and some path that checked 
for a set error doesn't check it anymore, and we report success when we hit an 
error, but it seems unlikely.

  Behavior of --simulate changes. This used to fail before as well, and
  will now only produce a warning. We don't believe that is a reason of
  concern.

  [Groovy SRU]
  The groovy SRU is a sync of the 2.1.11 micro release from Debian unstable 
which also incorporates changes to the documentation: A typo fix, replacing 
focal with groovy in examples, and minor Dutch manual pages translation updates.

  We do not have test cases for the documentation changes, and we do not
  consider there to be a huge regression potential. As long as they
  build, they should be readable - maybe some words are wrong in the
  translation, who knows.

  [Original bug report]
  Test Case
  1. Install Ubuntu Desktop on hardware with an nVidia card and select to 
install 3rd party drivers
  2. Proceed with installation

  The following error message is displayed in /var/log/syslog
  /plugininstall.py: Verifying downloads ...
  /plugininstall.py: Failed to find package object for 
/cdrom//pool/main/g/gcc-defaults/gcc_9.3.0-1ubuntu2_amd64.deb: "Version: 
'9.3.0-1ubuntu2' not found."
  /plugininstall.py: Failed to find package object for 
/cdrom//pool/main/libx/libxcrypt/libcrypt-dev_4.4.10-10ubuntu4_amd64.deb: 
"Version: '4.4.10-10ubuntu4' not found."
  /plugininstall.py: Failed to find package object for 
/cdrom//pool/main/g/gcc-defaults/g++_9.3.0-1ubuntu2_amd64.deb: "Version: 
'9.3.0-1ubuntu2' not found."
  /plugininstall.py: Failed to find package object for 
/cdrom//pool/main/z/zlib/zlib1g_1.2.11.dfsg-2ubuntu1_i386.deb: "Version: 
'1.2.11.dfsg-2ubuntu1' not 

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1907850] Re: Cache not generated for all translations

2021-03-25 Thread Łukasz Zemczak
Hello Julian, or anyone else affected,

Accepted apt into bionic-proposed. The package will build now and be
available at https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/apt/1.6.13 in a few
hours, and then in the -proposed repository.

Please help us by testing this new package.  See
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Testing/EnableProposed for documentation on how
to enable and use -proposed.  Your feedback will aid us getting this
update out to other Ubuntu users.

If this package fixes the bug for you, please add a comment to this bug,
mentioning the version of the package you tested, what testing has been
performed on the package and change the tag from verification-needed-
bionic to verification-done-bionic. If it does not fix the bug for you,
please add a comment stating that, and change the tag to verification-
failed-bionic. In either case, without details of your testing we will
not be able to proceed.

Further information regarding the verification process can be found at
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/QATeam/PerformingSRUVerification .  Thank you in
advance for helping!

N.B. The updated package will be released to -updates after the bug(s)
fixed by this package have been verified and the package has been in
-proposed for a minimum of 7 days.

** Changed in: apt (Ubuntu Bionic)
   Status: Confirmed => Fix Committed

** Tags added: verification-needed-bionic

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to apt in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1907850

Title:
  Cache not generated for all translations

Status in apt package in Ubuntu:
  Fix Released
Status in apt source package in Xenial:
  Confirmed
Status in apt source package in Bionic:
  Fix Committed
Status in apt source package in Focal:
  Fix Committed
Status in apt source package in Groovy:
  Fix Committed
Status in apt source package in Hirsute:
  Fix Released

Bug description:
  [Impact]
  In bug 1161743 we discovered that if a system is configured with multiple 
locales, only the locales of the user who generated the apt-cache will be 
available for translated descriptions.

  [Test case]
  An automated test case has been included as a snippet in  
test/integration/test-bug-49-search-in-all-translations which runs during 
autopkgtest. That's sufficient for validation.

  Manual test:

  # apt install locales-all # get the locale
  # export LANG=sv_SE.UTF-8
  # locale
  LANG=sv_SE.UTF-8
  LANGUAGE=
  LC_CTYPE="sv_SE.UTF-8"
  LC_NUMERIC="sv_SE.UTF-8"
  LC_TIME="sv_SE.UTF-8"
  LC_COLLATE="sv_SE.UTF-8"
  LC_MONETARY="sv_SE.UTF-8"
  LC_MESSAGES="sv_SE.UTF-8"
  LC_PAPER="sv_SE.UTF-8"
  LC_NAME="sv_SE.UTF-8"
  LC_ADDRESS="sv_SE.UTF-8"
  LC_TELEPHONE="sv_SE.UTF-8"
  LC_MEASUREMENT="sv_SE.UTF-8"
  LC_IDENTIFICATION="sv_SE.UTF-8"
  LC_ALL=
  # apt update
  # apt-cache show tasksel | grep Desc
  Description-sv: tool for selecting tasks for installation on Debian systems
  Description-md5: cbbb747708986d11ea77c80b9b038fec
  # apt-cache showpkg tasksel
  Package: tasksel
  Versions:
  3.34ubuntu16 
(/var/lib/apt/lists/archive.ubuntu.com_ubuntu_dists_groovy_main_binary-amd64_Packages)
   Description Language:
   File: 
/var/lib/apt/lists/archive.ubuntu.com_ubuntu_dists_groovy_main_binary-amd64_Packages
    MD5: cbbb747708986d11ea77c80b9b038fec
   Description Language: sv
   File: 
/var/lib/apt/lists/archive.ubuntu.com_ubuntu_dists_groovy_main_i18n_Translation-sv
    MD5: cbbb747708986d11ea77c80b9b038fec
   Description Language: en
   File: 
/var/lib/apt/lists/archive.ubuntu.com_ubuntu_dists_groovy_main_i18n_Translation-en
    MD5: cbbb747708986d11ea77c80b9b038fec
  [...]

  So far so good, but now assume the root user actually has C configured
  as locale, and e.g. runs apt-cache show (or apt-daily.service does an
  update):

  root@g:~# rm /var/cache/apt/*.bin
  root@g:~# LANG=C apt-cache  show tasksel
  [...]
  Description-en: tool for selecting tasks for installation on Debian systems
   This package provides 'tasksel', a simple interface for users who
   want to configure their system to perform a specific task.

  root@g:~# apt-cache  showpkg tasksel
  Package: tasksel
  Versions:
  3.34ubuntu16 
(/var/lib/apt/lists/archive.ubuntu.com_ubuntu_dists_groovy_main_binary-amd64_Packages)
   Description Language:
   File: 
/var/lib/apt/lists/archive.ubuntu.com_ubuntu_dists_groovy_main_binary-amd64_Packages
    MD5: cbbb747708986d11ea77c80b9b038fec
   Description Language: en
   File: 
/var/lib/apt/lists/archive.ubuntu.com_ubuntu_dists_groovy_main_i18n_Translation-en
    MD5: cbbb747708986d11ea77c80b9b038fec

  This should show the sv locale as well given that it's still around
  (also we are still running with LANG=sv_SE.UTF-8), but it only
  generated the cache with the english language description in here.

  [Where problems could 

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1918907] Re: Default Acquire::AllowReleaseInfoChange::Suite to "true"

2021-03-25 Thread Łukasz Zemczak
Hello Julian, or anyone else affected,

Accepted apt into focal-proposed. The package will build now and be
available at https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/apt/2.0.5 in a few
hours, and then in the -proposed repository.

Please help us by testing this new package.  See
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Testing/EnableProposed for documentation on how
to enable and use -proposed.  Your feedback will aid us getting this
update out to other Ubuntu users.

If this package fixes the bug for you, please add a comment to this bug,
mentioning the version of the package you tested, what testing has been
performed on the package and change the tag from verification-needed-
focal to verification-done-focal. If it does not fix the bug for you,
please add a comment stating that, and change the tag to verification-
failed-focal. In either case, without details of your testing we will
not be able to proceed.

Further information regarding the verification process can be found at
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/QATeam/PerformingSRUVerification .  Thank you in
advance for helping!

N.B. The updated package will be released to -updates after the bug(s)
fixed by this package have been verified and the package has been in
-proposed for a minimum of 7 days.

** Changed in: apt (Ubuntu Focal)
   Status: New => Fix Committed

** Tags added: verification-needed verification-needed-focal

** Changed in: apt (Ubuntu Bionic)
   Status: New => Fix Committed

** Tags added: verification-needed-bionic

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to apt in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1918907

Title:
  Default Acquire::AllowReleaseInfoChange::Suite to "true"

Status in apt package in Ubuntu:
  Fix Released
Status in apt source package in Bionic:
  Fix Committed
Status in apt source package in Focal:
  Fix Committed

Bug description:
  [Impact]
  APT 1.6-2.0 deny third-party repositories from changing their Suite value. 
This change was reverted in later apt releases, and will be reverted in 1.8 in 
Debian as well, so for consistency, we want to push that change to stable

  [Test plan]
  We added test cases to our extensive integration test suite run by 
autopkgtest.

  [Where problems could occur]
  It's hard to imagine anything here, we simply turn the flag for allowed from 
false to true. We even add tests for Suite changes :)

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/apt/+bug/1918907/+subscriptions

-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
Post to : touch-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


[Touch-packages] [Bug 1918907] Please test proposed package

2021-03-25 Thread Łukasz Zemczak
Hello Julian, or anyone else affected,

Accepted apt into bionic-proposed. The package will build now and be
available at https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/apt/1.6.13 in a few
hours, and then in the -proposed repository.

Please help us by testing this new package.  See
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Testing/EnableProposed for documentation on how
to enable and use -proposed.  Your feedback will aid us getting this
update out to other Ubuntu users.

If this package fixes the bug for you, please add a comment to this bug,
mentioning the version of the package you tested, what testing has been
performed on the package and change the tag from verification-needed-
bionic to verification-done-bionic. If it does not fix the bug for you,
please add a comment stating that, and change the tag to verification-
failed-bionic. In either case, without details of your testing we will
not be able to proceed.

Further information regarding the verification process can be found at
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/QATeam/PerformingSRUVerification .  Thank you in
advance for helping!

N.B. The updated package will be released to -updates after the bug(s)
fixed by this package have been verified and the package has been in
-proposed for a minimum of 7 days.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to apt in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1918907

Title:
  Default Acquire::AllowReleaseInfoChange::Suite to "true"

Status in apt package in Ubuntu:
  Fix Released
Status in apt source package in Bionic:
  Fix Committed
Status in apt source package in Focal:
  Fix Committed

Bug description:
  [Impact]
  APT 1.6-2.0 deny third-party repositories from changing their Suite value. 
This change was reverted in later apt releases, and will be reverted in 1.8 in 
Debian as well, so for consistency, we want to push that change to stable

  [Test plan]
  We added test cases to our extensive integration test suite run by 
autopkgtest.

  [Where problems could occur]
  It's hard to imagine anything here, we simply turn the flag for allowed from 
false to true. We even add tests for Suite changes :)

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/apt/+bug/1918907/+subscriptions

-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
Post to : touch-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


[Touch-packages] [Bug 1916725] Re: Protected/Important packages are not deconfigured, require Force-LoopBreak

2021-03-25 Thread Łukasz Zemczak
Hello Julian, or anyone else affected,

Accepted apt into bionic-proposed. The package will build now and be
available at https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/apt/1.6.13 in a few
hours, and then in the -proposed repository.

Please help us by testing this new package.  See
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Testing/EnableProposed for documentation on how
to enable and use -proposed.  Your feedback will aid us getting this
update out to other Ubuntu users.

If this package fixes the bug for you, please add a comment to this bug,
mentioning the version of the package you tested, what testing has been
performed on the package and change the tag from verification-needed-
bionic to verification-done-bionic. If it does not fix the bug for you,
please add a comment stating that, and change the tag to verification-
failed-bionic. In either case, without details of your testing we will
not be able to proceed.

Further information regarding the verification process can be found at
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/QATeam/PerformingSRUVerification .  Thank you in
advance for helping!

N.B. The updated package will be released to -updates after the bug(s)
fixed by this package have been verified and the package has been in
-proposed for a minimum of 7 days.

** Changed in: apt (Ubuntu Bionic)
   Status: Triaged => Fix Committed

** Tags added: verification-needed-bionic

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to apt in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1916725

Title:
  Protected/Important packages are not deconfigured, require Force-
  LoopBreak

Status in apt package in Ubuntu:
  Fix Released
Status in apt source package in Bionic:
  Fix Committed
Status in apt source package in Focal:
  Fix Committed
Status in apt source package in Groovy:
  Fix Committed
Status in apt source package in Hirsute:
  Fix Released

Bug description:
  [Impact]
  If a package that is Protected: yes (or Important: yes), or one of it's 
dependencies, is involved in a dependency loop with Breaks, APT requires 
APT::Force-LoopBreak instead of resolving the situation directly.

  On focal, we also introduce the actual support for protected packages
  to enable upgrading to later releases more easily (in case a protected
  package needs to be removed during the upgrade), and to make the
  backport more similar to main.

  [Test plan]
  Run the integration test suite (the autopkgtest) :)

  Our test suite covers the tests for both Breaks and Conflicts.

  Breaks:

  protected-sysvinit (= 1) without dependencies is installed
  protected-sysvinit (= 2) Pre-Depends protected-systemd-sysv
  protected-systemd-sysv (= 2) Breaks: protected-sysvinit (<< 2)

  Test: Install protected-sysvinit (= 2)
  Expected result: Unpacking protected-sysvinit (= 2) deconfigures 
protected-sysvinit (= 1), and then we unpack and configure protected-sysvinit 
(= 2) and end up with a working system.

  Conflicts: As for Breaks, but the Conflicts will remove the package
  temporarily, requiring the use of APT::Force-LoopBreak option.

  For focal, we also do have a test to check that the Protected field is
  being used.

  [Where problems could occur]
  We now allow dpkg to automatically deconfigure protected packages. This 
should just make them behave like normal packages to APT's eye, but bugs I 
guess could occur somewhere in the APT/dpkg interaction (this only applies to 
releases with Protected support in dpkg, Important is not affected, it's always 
been "normal" for dpkg).

  During development, we accidentally simplified the patch so much that
  Conflicts did not require Force-LoopBreak for temporary removal. We
  fixed that, but it points out that there is a place where the loop
  break check happens that is a potential regression place.

  On focal, we pass additional flags to dpkg that focal's dpkg does not
  understand, however, we only do that if dpkg asserts it does that, so
  in practice, this should all work fine and the code path will only be
  taken with >=groovy dpkg.

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/apt/+bug/1916725/+subscriptions

-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
Post to : touch-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


[Touch-packages] [Bug 1916050] Re: Invalid base64 for high-bit characters

2021-03-25 Thread Łukasz Zemczak
Hello Julian, or anyone else affected,

Accepted apt into bionic-proposed. The package will build now and be
available at https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/apt/1.6.13 in a few
hours, and then in the -proposed repository.

Please help us by testing this new package.  See
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Testing/EnableProposed for documentation on how
to enable and use -proposed.  Your feedback will aid us getting this
update out to other Ubuntu users.

If this package fixes the bug for you, please add a comment to this bug,
mentioning the version of the package you tested, what testing has been
performed on the package and change the tag from verification-needed-
bionic to verification-done-bionic. If it does not fix the bug for you,
please add a comment stating that, and change the tag to verification-
failed-bionic. In either case, without details of your testing we will
not be able to proceed.

Further information regarding the verification process can be found at
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/QATeam/PerformingSRUVerification .  Thank you in
advance for helping!

N.B. The updated package will be released to -updates after the bug(s)
fixed by this package have been verified and the package has been in
-proposed for a minimum of 7 days.

** Changed in: apt (Ubuntu Bionic)
   Status: Confirmed => Fix Committed

** Tags added: verification-needed-bionic

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to apt in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1916050

Title:
  Invalid base64 for high-bit characters

Status in apt package in Ubuntu:
  Fix Released
Status in apt source package in Xenial:
  Confirmed
Status in apt source package in Bionic:
  Fix Committed
Status in apt source package in Focal:
  Fix Committed
Status in apt source package in Groovy:
  Fix Committed
Status in apt source package in Hirsute:
  Fix Released

Bug description:
  [Impact]
  The Base64Encode function incorrectly encodes using char instead of uint8_t, 
leading to characters with the high bit set to be encoded wrongly. This 
function is used for base authentication, and high bits are set for UTF-8 
character sequences, so it's likely affecting people with utf-8 user names and 
passwords and might cause them to be denied access to their https resources 
(though arguably they'd work around that).

  [Test case]
  A unit test has been added that checks that the encoding is correct.

  [Where problems could occur]
  This only affects the base64 encoding function, which is only used for 
quoting user names and passwords in basic auth in http, but it's also exposed 
to library users and like in python-apt, so problems could occur wherever they 
use that base64 encoding function as well.

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/apt/+bug/1916050/+subscriptions

-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
Post to : touch-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


[Touch-packages] [Bug 1918920] Please test proposed package

2021-03-25 Thread Łukasz Zemczak
Hello Julian, or anyone else affected,

Accepted apt into bionic-proposed. The package will build now and be
available at https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/apt/1.6.13 in a few
hours, and then in the -proposed repository.

Please help us by testing this new package.  See
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Testing/EnableProposed for documentation on how
to enable and use -proposed.  Your feedback will aid us getting this
update out to other Ubuntu users.

If this package fixes the bug for you, please add a comment to this bug,
mentioning the version of the package you tested, what testing has been
performed on the package and change the tag from verification-needed-
bionic to verification-done-bionic. If it does not fix the bug for you,
please add a comment stating that, and change the tag to verification-
failed-bionic. In either case, without details of your testing we will
not be able to proceed.

Further information regarding the verification process can be found at
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/QATeam/PerformingSRUVerification .  Thank you in
advance for helping!

N.B. The updated package will be released to -updates after the bug(s)
fixed by this package have been verified and the package has been in
-proposed for a minimum of 7 days.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to apt in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1918920

Title:
  Harden test for no new acquires after transaction abort

Status in apt package in Ubuntu:
  Fix Committed
Status in apt source package in Bionic:
  Fix Committed
Status in apt source package in Focal:
  Fix Committed
Status in apt source package in Groovy:
  Fix Committed

Bug description:
  [Impact]
  test-pdiff-usage is somewhat flaky, especially on Debian, this makes it less 
flaky. No end user impact as it's a test-only change.

  [Test plan]
  Running autopkgtest, which runs our extensive integration test suite which 
includes the changed test.

  [Where problems could occur]
  No end user regression potential on its own, but might slightly change 
regression potential for future pdiff changes:

  Test approach is slightly different now. It still catches that updates
  fail correctly, but tests more concretely that a transaction was
  aborted rather than that no worker received work (which was not
  guaranteed, the work could be scheduled before it was aborted).

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/apt/+bug/1918920/+subscriptions

-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
Post to : touch-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


[Touch-packages] [Bug 1918920] Re: Harden test for no new acquires after transaction abort

2021-03-25 Thread Łukasz Zemczak
Hello Julian, or anyone else affected,

Accepted apt into focal-proposed. The package will build now and be
available at https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/apt/2.0.5 in a few
hours, and then in the -proposed repository.

Please help us by testing this new package.  See
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Testing/EnableProposed for documentation on how
to enable and use -proposed.  Your feedback will aid us getting this
update out to other Ubuntu users.

If this package fixes the bug for you, please add a comment to this bug,
mentioning the version of the package you tested, what testing has been
performed on the package and change the tag from verification-needed-
focal to verification-done-focal. If it does not fix the bug for you,
please add a comment stating that, and change the tag to verification-
failed-focal. In either case, without details of your testing we will
not be able to proceed.

Further information regarding the verification process can be found at
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/QATeam/PerformingSRUVerification .  Thank you in
advance for helping!

N.B. The updated package will be released to -updates after the bug(s)
fixed by this package have been verified and the package has been in
-proposed for a minimum of 7 days.

** Changed in: apt (Ubuntu Focal)
   Status: New => Fix Committed

** Tags added: verification-needed-focal

** Changed in: apt (Ubuntu Bionic)
   Status: New => Fix Committed

** Tags added: verification-needed-bionic

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to apt in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1918920

Title:
  Harden test for no new acquires after transaction abort

Status in apt package in Ubuntu:
  Fix Committed
Status in apt source package in Bionic:
  Fix Committed
Status in apt source package in Focal:
  Fix Committed
Status in apt source package in Groovy:
  Fix Committed

Bug description:
  [Impact]
  test-pdiff-usage is somewhat flaky, especially on Debian, this makes it less 
flaky. No end user impact as it's a test-only change.

  [Test plan]
  Running autopkgtest, which runs our extensive integration test suite which 
includes the changed test.

  [Where problems could occur]
  No end user regression potential on its own, but might slightly change 
regression potential for future pdiff changes:

  Test approach is slightly different now. It still catches that updates
  fail correctly, but tests more concretely that a transaction was
  aborted rather than that no worker received work (which was not
  guaranteed, the work could be scheduled before it was aborted).

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/apt/+bug/1918920/+subscriptions

-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
Post to : touch-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


[Touch-packages] [Bug 1615381] Re: apt-get autoremove may remove current kernel

2021-03-25 Thread Łukasz Zemczak
Hello Jarno, or anyone else affected,

Accepted apt into focal-proposed. The package will build now and be
available at https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/apt/2.0.5 in a few
hours, and then in the -proposed repository.

Please help us by testing this new package.  See
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Testing/EnableProposed for documentation on how
to enable and use -proposed.  Your feedback will aid us getting this
update out to other Ubuntu users.

If this package fixes the bug for you, please add a comment to this bug,
mentioning the version of the package you tested, what testing has been
performed on the package and change the tag from verification-needed-
focal to verification-done-focal. If it does not fix the bug for you,
please add a comment stating that, and change the tag to verification-
failed-focal. In either case, without details of your testing we will
not be able to proceed.

Further information regarding the verification process can be found at
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/QATeam/PerformingSRUVerification .  Thank you in
advance for helping!

N.B. The updated package will be released to -updates after the bug(s)
fixed by this package have been verified and the package has been in
-proposed for a minimum of 7 days.

** Changed in: apt (Ubuntu Focal)
   Status: Confirmed => Fix Committed

** Tags added: verification-needed-focal

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to unattended-upgrades in
Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1615381

Title:
  apt-get autoremove may remove current kernel

Status in apt package in Ubuntu:
  Fix Released
Status in unattended-upgrades package in Ubuntu:
  Fix Released
Status in unattended-upgrades source package in Trusty:
  Won't Fix
Status in unattended-upgrades source package in Xenial:
  Fix Released
Status in unattended-upgrades source package in Artful:
  Won't Fix
Status in apt source package in Bionic:
  Fix Committed
Status in apt source package in Focal:
  Fix Committed
Status in apt source package in Groovy:
  Fix Committed
Status in apt source package in Hirsute:
  Fix Released

Bug description:
  [Impact]
  APT will try and fail to remove the currently running kernel, when booted 
into an older kernel that is not protected. May wreak some havoc if mixed with 
other operations to the point that apt goes weird and needs manual fixing up.

  [Test case]
  For the SRUs we have included an automated test case that starts with an 
empty autoremove config file, and then checks that the running kernel is 
protected at runtime.

  You can also test manually, but it's not necessary:

  - Install new kernel
  - Reboot into kernel not listed as protected in 01autoremove-kernels
  - Run autoremove

  [Where problems could occur]
  We may more easily run out of space in /boot. hirsute has new autoremoval 
code that runs completely at runtime; but that seems a bit large to SRU after 
only a few weeks in hirsute. Hence, we should protect the current kernel _in 
addition_ to the other kernels, just like unattended-upgrades and 
update-manager do. This increases the risk of filling up /boot compared to 
older apt versions, but is at the same level as unattended-upgrades and 
update-manager.

  [Original bug report]

  This may happen, if you boot one of the older kernels, that is not
  protected by /etc/apt/apt.conf.d/01autoremove-kernels

  Workaround: run
  /etc/kernel/postinst.d/apt-auto-removal
  during each boot (e.g. by using cron).
  Note: The workaround breaks autoremoving feature of new unneeded kernels in  
unattended-upgrades i.e. the setting 
'Unattended-Upgrade::Remove-New-Unused-Dependencies "true"' (which is default 
in 16.04 unless 'Unattended-Upgrade::Remove-Unused-Dependencies "true"' is set 
in '/etc/apt/apt.conf.d/50unattended-upgrades'.

  In shell:

  $ uname -r
  4.4.0-22-generic
  $ apt-get -s autoremove
  NOTE: This is only a simulation!
    apt-get needs root privileges for real execution.
    Keep also in mind that locking is deactivated,
    so don't depend on the relevance to the real current situation!
  Reading package lists... Done
  Building dependency tree
  Reading state information... Done
  The following packages will be REMOVED:
    linux-headers-4.4.0-21 linux-headers-4.4.0-21-generic linux-headers-4.4.0-22
    linux-headers-4.4.0-22-generic linux-headers-4.4.0-31-generic
    linux-image-4.4.0-21-generic linux-image-4.4.0-22-generic
    linux-image-4.4.0-31-generic linux-image-extra-4.4.0-21-generic
    linux-image-extra-4.4.0-22-generic linux-image-extra-4.4.0-31-generic
  0 upgraded, 0 newly installed, 11 to remove and 13 not upgraded.

  ProblemType: Bug
  DistroRelease: Ubuntu 16.04
  Package: apt 1.2.12~ubuntu16.04.1
  ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 4.4.0-22.40-generic 4.4.8
  Uname: Linux 4.4.0-22-generic x86_64
  ApportVersion: 2.20.1-0ubuntu2.1
  Architecture: amd64
  CurrentDesktop: XFCE
  Date: Sun Aug 21 16:11:27 2016
  

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1693900] Re: apt-get update should return exit code != 0 on error

2021-03-25 Thread Łukasz Zemczak
Hello Jens, or anyone else affected,

Accepted apt into focal-proposed. The package will build now and be
available at https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/apt/2.0.5 in a few
hours, and then in the -proposed repository.

Please help us by testing this new package.  See
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Testing/EnableProposed for documentation on how
to enable and use -proposed.  Your feedback will aid us getting this
update out to other Ubuntu users.

If this package fixes the bug for you, please add a comment to this bug,
mentioning the version of the package you tested, what testing has been
performed on the package and change the tag from verification-needed-
focal to verification-done-focal. If it does not fix the bug for you,
please add a comment stating that, and change the tag to verification-
failed-focal. In either case, without details of your testing we will
not be able to proceed.

Further information regarding the verification process can be found at
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/QATeam/PerformingSRUVerification .  Thank you in
advance for helping!

N.B. The updated package will be released to -updates after the bug(s)
fixed by this package have been verified and the package has been in
-proposed for a minimum of 7 days.

** Changed in: apt (Ubuntu Focal)
   Status: Triaged => Fix Committed

** Tags added: verification-needed-focal

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to apt in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1693900

Title:
  apt-get update should return exit code != 0 on error

Status in apt package in Ubuntu:
  Fix Released
Status in apt source package in Xenial:
  New
Status in apt source package in Bionic:
  Triaged
Status in apt source package in Focal:
  Fix Committed
Status in apt source package in Groovy:
  Fix Committed

Bug description:
  [Impact]
  There is no way for scripts to run apt update and be sure that it was 
entirely successful.

  We introduce a new flag, --error-mode=any that makes apt update also
  error out on transient errors.

  [Test plan]
  We have included a test in the test-suite in 
test-apt-update-failure-propagation that ensures that warnings become errors.

  [Where problems could occur]
  If there's an issue some warnings for transient errors could become errors, 
or worse I suppose it's possible but unlikely for errors to be reported as 
warnings...

  Since the new behavior is behind a flag, regression potential for
  existing scripts is low if there is no bug.

  [Original bug report]

  When running 'apt-get update' (e.g. on a container install post-
  install script), apt-get return with exit code 0, even so it wasn't
  able to "update" properly. E.g.:

  + apt-get update
  Err:1 http://de.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu xenial InRelease
    Temporary failure resolving 'de.archive.ubuntu.com'
  Err:2 http://security.ubuntu.com/ubuntu xenial-security InRelease
    Temporary failure resolving 'security.ubuntu.com'
  Err:3 http://de.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu xenial-updates InRelease
    Temporary failure resolving 'de.archive.ubuntu.com'
  Reading package lists... Done
  W: Failed to fetch http://de.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/dists/xenial/InRelease 
 Temporary failure resolving 'de.archive.ubuntu.com'
  W: Failed to fetch 
http://de.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/dists/xenial-updates/InRelease  Temporary 
failure resolving 'de.archive.ubuntu.com'
  W: Failed to fetch 
http://security.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/dists/xenial-security/InRelease  Temporary 
failure resolving 'security.ubuntu.com'
  W: Some index files failed to download. They have been ignored, or old ones 
used instead.

  It should be corrected to return useful exit code, so that scripts can
  take the appropriate actions ...

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/apt/+bug/1693900/+subscriptions

-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
Post to : touch-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


[Touch-packages] [Bug 1877987] Re: apt search coredumping

2021-03-25 Thread Łukasz Zemczak
Hello netmonk, or anyone else affected,

Accepted apt into focal-proposed. The package will build now and be
available at https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/apt/2.0.5 in a few
hours, and then in the -proposed repository.

Please help us by testing this new package.  See
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Testing/EnableProposed for documentation on how
to enable and use -proposed.  Your feedback will aid us getting this
update out to other Ubuntu users.

If this package fixes the bug for you, please add a comment to this bug,
mentioning the version of the package you tested, what testing has been
performed on the package and change the tag from verification-needed-
focal to verification-done-focal. If it does not fix the bug for you,
please add a comment stating that, and change the tag to verification-
failed-focal. In either case, without details of your testing we will
not be able to proceed.

Further information regarding the verification process can be found at
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/QATeam/PerformingSRUVerification .  Thank you in
advance for helping!

N.B. The updated package will be released to -updates after the bug(s)
fixed by this package have been verified and the package has been in
-proposed for a minimum of 7 days.

** Changed in: apt (Ubuntu Focal)
   Status: Triaged => Fix Committed

** Tags added: verification-needed verification-needed-focal

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to apt in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1877987

Title:
  apt search coredumping

Status in apt package in Ubuntu:
  Fix Released
Status in apt source package in Focal:
  Fix Committed

Bug description:
  [Impact]
  Search sometimes crashes if no translated description is available, as the 
translated description object was used without a check as to whether it exists.

  [Test case]
  No reproducer available at the moment.

  
  [Where problems could occur]
  In search command only, and only when looking at descriptions

  [Original bug report]
  root@citoyx:/var/crash# apt search jdk
  Sorting... Done
  Segmentation fault (core dumped)

  May 11 12:34:25 citoyx kernel: [ 1354.337907] apt[10418]: segfault at 
7f67292dcfc0 ip 7f6309ce4997 sp 7ffdab880930 error 4 in 
libapt-pkg.so.6.0.0[7f6309bb5000+147000]
  May 11 12:34:25 citoyx kernel: [ 1354.337916] Code: 48 8b 45 18 48 8b 04 d0 
48 83 c4 08 5b 5d c3 0f 1f 40 00 f3 0f 1e fa 55 48 89 fd 53 48 89 f3 48 83 ec 
08 48 8b 06 48 8b 4e 08 <8b> 10 48 8d 04 d5 00 00 00 00 48 29 d0 48 8b 51 60 48 
8d 04 c2 0f

  root@citoyx:/var/crash# cat /etc/lsb-release
  DISTRIB_ID=Ubuntu
  DISTRIB_RELEASE=20.04
  DISTRIB_CODENAME=focal
  DISTRIB_DESCRIPTION="Ubuntu 20.04 LTS"

  apt search is coredumping
  While apt install/upgrade/update is running fine

  crash file in attachment.

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/apt/+bug/1877987/+subscriptions

-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
Post to : touch-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


[Touch-packages] [Bug 1907850] Re: Cache not generated for all translations

2021-03-25 Thread Łukasz Zemczak
Hello Julian, or anyone else affected,

Accepted apt into focal-proposed. The package will build now and be
available at https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/apt/2.0.5 in a few
hours, and then in the -proposed repository.

Please help us by testing this new package.  See
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Testing/EnableProposed for documentation on how
to enable and use -proposed.  Your feedback will aid us getting this
update out to other Ubuntu users.

If this package fixes the bug for you, please add a comment to this bug,
mentioning the version of the package you tested, what testing has been
performed on the package and change the tag from verification-needed-
focal to verification-done-focal. If it does not fix the bug for you,
please add a comment stating that, and change the tag to verification-
failed-focal. In either case, without details of your testing we will
not be able to proceed.

Further information regarding the verification process can be found at
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/QATeam/PerformingSRUVerification .  Thank you in
advance for helping!

N.B. The updated package will be released to -updates after the bug(s)
fixed by this package have been verified and the package has been in
-proposed for a minimum of 7 days.

** Changed in: apt (Ubuntu Focal)
   Status: Confirmed => Fix Committed

** Tags added: verification-needed-focal

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to apt in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1907850

Title:
  Cache not generated for all translations

Status in apt package in Ubuntu:
  Fix Released
Status in apt source package in Xenial:
  Confirmed
Status in apt source package in Bionic:
  Confirmed
Status in apt source package in Focal:
  Fix Committed
Status in apt source package in Groovy:
  Fix Committed
Status in apt source package in Hirsute:
  Fix Released

Bug description:
  [Impact]
  In bug 1161743 we discovered that if a system is configured with multiple 
locales, only the locales of the user who generated the apt-cache will be 
available for translated descriptions.

  [Test case]
  An automated test case has been included as a snippet in  
test/integration/test-bug-49-search-in-all-translations which runs during 
autopkgtest. That's sufficient for validation.

  Manual test:

  # apt install locales-all # get the locale
  # export LANG=sv_SE.UTF-8
  # locale
  LANG=sv_SE.UTF-8
  LANGUAGE=
  LC_CTYPE="sv_SE.UTF-8"
  LC_NUMERIC="sv_SE.UTF-8"
  LC_TIME="sv_SE.UTF-8"
  LC_COLLATE="sv_SE.UTF-8"
  LC_MONETARY="sv_SE.UTF-8"
  LC_MESSAGES="sv_SE.UTF-8"
  LC_PAPER="sv_SE.UTF-8"
  LC_NAME="sv_SE.UTF-8"
  LC_ADDRESS="sv_SE.UTF-8"
  LC_TELEPHONE="sv_SE.UTF-8"
  LC_MEASUREMENT="sv_SE.UTF-8"
  LC_IDENTIFICATION="sv_SE.UTF-8"
  LC_ALL=
  # apt update
  # apt-cache show tasksel | grep Desc
  Description-sv: tool for selecting tasks for installation on Debian systems
  Description-md5: cbbb747708986d11ea77c80b9b038fec
  # apt-cache showpkg tasksel
  Package: tasksel
  Versions:
  3.34ubuntu16 
(/var/lib/apt/lists/archive.ubuntu.com_ubuntu_dists_groovy_main_binary-amd64_Packages)
   Description Language:
   File: 
/var/lib/apt/lists/archive.ubuntu.com_ubuntu_dists_groovy_main_binary-amd64_Packages
    MD5: cbbb747708986d11ea77c80b9b038fec
   Description Language: sv
   File: 
/var/lib/apt/lists/archive.ubuntu.com_ubuntu_dists_groovy_main_i18n_Translation-sv
    MD5: cbbb747708986d11ea77c80b9b038fec
   Description Language: en
   File: 
/var/lib/apt/lists/archive.ubuntu.com_ubuntu_dists_groovy_main_i18n_Translation-en
    MD5: cbbb747708986d11ea77c80b9b038fec
  [...]

  So far so good, but now assume the root user actually has C configured
  as locale, and e.g. runs apt-cache show (or apt-daily.service does an
  update):

  root@g:~# rm /var/cache/apt/*.bin
  root@g:~# LANG=C apt-cache  show tasksel
  [...]
  Description-en: tool for selecting tasks for installation on Debian systems
   This package provides 'tasksel', a simple interface for users who
   want to configure their system to perform a specific task.

  root@g:~# apt-cache  showpkg tasksel
  Package: tasksel
  Versions:
  3.34ubuntu16 
(/var/lib/apt/lists/archive.ubuntu.com_ubuntu_dists_groovy_main_binary-amd64_Packages)
   Description Language:
   File: 
/var/lib/apt/lists/archive.ubuntu.com_ubuntu_dists_groovy_main_binary-amd64_Packages
    MD5: cbbb747708986d11ea77c80b9b038fec
   Description Language: en
   File: 
/var/lib/apt/lists/archive.ubuntu.com_ubuntu_dists_groovy_main_i18n_Translation-en
    MD5: cbbb747708986d11ea77c80b9b038fec

  This should show the sv locale as well given that it's still around
  (also we are still running with LANG=sv_SE.UTF-8), but it only
  generated the cache with the english language description in here.

  [Where problems could occur]
  

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1916050] Re: Invalid base64 for high-bit characters

2021-03-25 Thread Łukasz Zemczak
Hello Julian, or anyone else affected,

Accepted apt into focal-proposed. The package will build now and be
available at https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/apt/2.0.5 in a few
hours, and then in the -proposed repository.

Please help us by testing this new package.  See
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Testing/EnableProposed for documentation on how
to enable and use -proposed.  Your feedback will aid us getting this
update out to other Ubuntu users.

If this package fixes the bug for you, please add a comment to this bug,
mentioning the version of the package you tested, what testing has been
performed on the package and change the tag from verification-needed-
focal to verification-done-focal. If it does not fix the bug for you,
please add a comment stating that, and change the tag to verification-
failed-focal. In either case, without details of your testing we will
not be able to proceed.

Further information regarding the verification process can be found at
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/QATeam/PerformingSRUVerification .  Thank you in
advance for helping!

N.B. The updated package will be released to -updates after the bug(s)
fixed by this package have been verified and the package has been in
-proposed for a minimum of 7 days.

** Changed in: apt (Ubuntu Focal)
   Status: Confirmed => Fix Committed

** Tags added: verification-needed-focal

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to apt in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1916050

Title:
  Invalid base64 for high-bit characters

Status in apt package in Ubuntu:
  Fix Released
Status in apt source package in Xenial:
  Confirmed
Status in apt source package in Bionic:
  Confirmed
Status in apt source package in Focal:
  Fix Committed
Status in apt source package in Groovy:
  Fix Committed
Status in apt source package in Hirsute:
  Fix Released

Bug description:
  [Impact]
  The Base64Encode function incorrectly encodes using char instead of uint8_t, 
leading to characters with the high bit set to be encoded wrongly. This 
function is used for base authentication, and high bits are set for UTF-8 
character sequences, so it's likely affecting people with utf-8 user names and 
passwords and might cause them to be denied access to their https resources 
(though arguably they'd work around that).

  [Test case]
  A unit test has been added that checks that the encoding is correct.

  [Where problems could occur]
  This only affects the base64 encoding function, which is only used for 
quoting user names and passwords in basic auth in http, but it's also exposed 
to library users and like in python-apt, so problems could occur wherever they 
use that base64 encoding function as well.

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/apt/+bug/1916050/+subscriptions

-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
Post to : touch-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


[Touch-packages] [Bug 1916725] Re: Protected/Important packages are not deconfigured, require Force-LoopBreak

2021-03-25 Thread Łukasz Zemczak
Hello Julian, or anyone else affected,

Accepted apt into focal-proposed. The package will build now and be
available at https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/apt/2.0.5 in a few
hours, and then in the -proposed repository.

Please help us by testing this new package.  See
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Testing/EnableProposed for documentation on how
to enable and use -proposed.  Your feedback will aid us getting this
update out to other Ubuntu users.

If this package fixes the bug for you, please add a comment to this bug,
mentioning the version of the package you tested, what testing has been
performed on the package and change the tag from verification-needed-
focal to verification-done-focal. If it does not fix the bug for you,
please add a comment stating that, and change the tag to verification-
failed-focal. In either case, without details of your testing we will
not be able to proceed.

Further information regarding the verification process can be found at
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/QATeam/PerformingSRUVerification .  Thank you in
advance for helping!

N.B. The updated package will be released to -updates after the bug(s)
fixed by this package have been verified and the package has been in
-proposed for a minimum of 7 days.

** Changed in: apt (Ubuntu Focal)
   Status: Triaged => Fix Committed

** Tags added: verification-needed-focal

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to apt in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1916725

Title:
  Protected/Important packages are not deconfigured, require Force-
  LoopBreak

Status in apt package in Ubuntu:
  Fix Released
Status in apt source package in Bionic:
  Triaged
Status in apt source package in Focal:
  Fix Committed
Status in apt source package in Groovy:
  Fix Committed
Status in apt source package in Hirsute:
  Fix Released

Bug description:
  [Impact]
  If a package that is Protected: yes (or Important: yes), or one of it's 
dependencies, is involved in a dependency loop with Breaks, APT requires 
APT::Force-LoopBreak instead of resolving the situation directly.

  On focal, we also introduce the actual support for protected packages
  to enable upgrading to later releases more easily (in case a protected
  package needs to be removed during the upgrade), and to make the
  backport more similar to main.

  [Test plan]
  Run the integration test suite (the autopkgtest) :)

  Our test suite covers the tests for both Breaks and Conflicts.

  Breaks:

  protected-sysvinit (= 1) without dependencies is installed
  protected-sysvinit (= 2) Pre-Depends protected-systemd-sysv
  protected-systemd-sysv (= 2) Breaks: protected-sysvinit (<< 2)

  Test: Install protected-sysvinit (= 2)
  Expected result: Unpacking protected-sysvinit (= 2) deconfigures 
protected-sysvinit (= 1), and then we unpack and configure protected-sysvinit 
(= 2) and end up with a working system.

  Conflicts: As for Breaks, but the Conflicts will remove the package
  temporarily, requiring the use of APT::Force-LoopBreak option.

  For focal, we also do have a test to check that the Protected field is
  being used.

  [Where problems could occur]
  We now allow dpkg to automatically deconfigure protected packages. This 
should just make them behave like normal packages to APT's eye, but bugs I 
guess could occur somewhere in the APT/dpkg interaction (this only applies to 
releases with Protected support in dpkg, Important is not affected, it's always 
been "normal" for dpkg).

  During development, we accidentally simplified the patch so much that
  Conflicts did not require Force-LoopBreak for temporary removal. We
  fixed that, but it points out that there is a place where the loop
  break check happens that is a potential regression place.

  On focal, we pass additional flags to dpkg that focal's dpkg does not
  understand, however, we only do that if dpkg asserts it does that, so
  in practice, this should all work fine and the code path will only be
  taken with >=groovy dpkg.

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/apt/+bug/1916725/+subscriptions

-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
Post to : touch-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


[Touch-packages] [Bug 1904213] Re: Built-in microphone not working with 20.04 on ThinkBook 13s IML [Realtek ALC257]

2021-03-25 Thread Anton
I have the same issue with that laptop using Fedora 33:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1934754

Found temporary solution here:
https://github.com/thesofproject/linux/issues/2795

** Bug watch added: github.com/thesofproject/linux/issues #2795
   https://github.com/thesofproject/linux/issues/2795

** Also affects: sound-2.6 via
   https://github.com/thesofproject/linux/issues/2795
   Importance: Unknown
   Status: Unknown

** Bug watch added: Red Hat Bugzilla #1934754
   https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1934754

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to alsa-driver in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1904213

Title:
  Built-in microphone not working with 20.04 on ThinkBook 13s IML
  [Realtek ALC257]

Status in sound-2.6 (alsa-kernel):
  Unknown
Status in alsa-driver package in Ubuntu:
  Confirmed

Bug description:
  After installing current 20.04 release on ThinkBook 13s IML with Intel
  audio card built-in microphone is not working - I'm unable to record
  anything.

  I could confirm that it was working in Windows 10 (previously
  installed on that laptop), and when I'm using headphones their
  microphone is working fine.

  ProblemType: Bug
  DistroRelease: Ubuntu 20.04
  Package: alsa-base 1.0.25+dfsg-0ubuntu5
  ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 5.4.0-53.59-generic 5.4.65
  Uname: Linux 5.4.0-53-generic x86_64
  ApportVersion: 2.20.11-0ubuntu27.12
  Architecture: amd64
  AudioDevicesInUse:
   USERPID ACCESS COMMAND
   /dev/snd/controlC0:  anlar  1496 F pulseaudio
  CasperMD5CheckResult: skip
  CurrentDesktop: ubuntu:GNOME
  Date: Fri Nov 13 19:07:34 2020
  InstallationDate: Installed on 2020-10-29 (14 days ago)
  InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 20.04.1 LTS "Focal Fossa" - Release amd64 (20200731)
  PackageArchitecture: all
  SourcePackage: alsa-driver
  Symptom: audio
  Symptom_AlsaRecordingTest: ALSA recording test through plughw:sofhdadsp failed
  Symptom_Card: sof-hda-dsp - sof-hda-dsp
  Symptom_Jack: Black Mic, Right
  Symptom_Type: Only some of inputs are working
  Title: [20RR, Realtek ALC257, Black Mic, Right] Recording problem
  UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install)
  dmi.bios.date: 10/29/2019
  dmi.bios.vendor: LENOVO
  dmi.bios.version: CQCN24WW
  dmi.board.asset.tag: No Asset Tag
  dmi.board.name: LNVNB161216
  dmi.board.vendor: LENOVO
  dmi.board.version: SDK0J40697WIN
  dmi.chassis.asset.tag: No Asset Tag
  dmi.chassis.type: 10
  dmi.chassis.vendor: LENOVO
  dmi.chassis.version: Lenovo ThinkBook 13s-IML
  dmi.modalias: 
dmi:bvnLENOVO:bvrCQCN24WW:bd10/29/2019:svnLENOVO:pn20RR:pvrLenovoThinkBook13s-IML:rvnLENOVO:rnLNVNB161216:rvrSDK0J40697WIN:cvnLENOVO:ct10:cvrLenovoThinkBook13s-IML:
  dmi.product.family: ThinkBook 13s-IML
  dmi.product.name: 20RR
  dmi.product.sku: LENOVO_MT_20RR_BU_idea_FM_ThinkBook 13s-IML
  dmi.product.version: Lenovo ThinkBook 13s-IML
  dmi.sys.vendor: LENOVO

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/sound-2.6/+bug/1904213/+subscriptions

-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
Post to : touch-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


[Touch-packages] [Bug 1921350] Re: UFW hangs indefinitely on any action

2021-03-25 Thread Jamie Strandboge
Thanks you for reporting a bug. Are there other ufw commands running at the 
same time? Eg, what is the output of:
$ ps auxww|grep ufw

** Changed in: ufw (Ubuntu)
   Status: New => Incomplete

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to ufw in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1921350

Title:
  UFW hangs indefinitely on any action

Status in ufw package in Ubuntu:
  Incomplete

Bug description:
  When installing a new cloudserver (on Amazon EC2, if it makes a
  difference), UFW completely hangs on any command, for example ufw
  status. Interrupting it with Ctrl+C yields this backtrace:

  Traceback (most recent call last):
File "/usr/sbin/ufw", line 130, in 
  lock = create_lock(lockfile=lockfile, dryrun=pr.dryrun)
File "/usr/lib/python3/dist-packages/ufw/util.py", line 1112, in create_lock
  fcntl.lockf(lock, fcntl.LOCK_EX)
  KeyboardInterrupt

  The line numbers are always the same.

  The platform is Ubuntu Server 20.04 (Ubuntu 20.04.2 LTS), from the
  Amazon image. I have not seen this bug on other servers. UFW is
  version 0.36.

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ufw/+bug/1921350/+subscriptions

-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
Post to : touch-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


[Touch-packages] [Bug 1921385] [NEW] Xorg freeze

2021-03-25 Thread John Cummo
Public bug reported:

The boot program is very slow.
An error dialog pops up simply stating there is a problem with the system.
If I open the details a long long list of data is shown, way above my technical 
knowledge.

ProblemType: Bug
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 16.04
Package: xorg 1:7.7+13ubuntu3.1
ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 4.15.0-140.144~16.04.1-generic 4.15.18
Uname: Linux 4.15.0-140-generic i686
NonfreeKernelModules: wl
.tmp.unity_support_test.0:
 
ApportVersion: 2.20.1-0ubuntu2.30
Architecture: i386
CompizPlugins: No value set for 
`/apps/compiz-1/general/screen0/options/active_plugins'
CompositorRunning: compiz
CompositorUnredirectDriverBlacklist: '(nouveau|Intel).*Mesa 8.0'
CompositorUnredirectFSW: true
CurrentDesktop: Unity
Date: Thu Mar 25 08:22:18 2021
DistUpgraded: Fresh install
DistroCodename: xenial
DistroVariant: ubuntu
DkmsStatus:
 bcmwl, 6.30.223.271+bdcom, 4.15.0-139-generic, i686: installed
 bcmwl, 6.30.223.271+bdcom, 4.15.0-140-generic, i686: installed
ExtraDebuggingInterest: Yes, if not too technical
GraphicsCard:
 Intel Corporation Mobile GM965/GL960 Integrated Graphics Controller (primary) 
[8086:2a02] (rev 0c) (prog-if 00 [VGA controller])
   Subsystem: Dell Inspiron 1525 [1028:022f]
   Subsystem: Dell Inspiron 1525 [1028:022f]
InstallationDate: Installed on 2021-03-17 (7 days ago)
InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 16.04.6 LTS "Xenial Xerus" - Release i386 (20190227.1)
MachineType: Dell Inc. Inspiron 1525
ProcEnviron:
 LANGUAGE=en_US
 PATH=(custom, no user)
 XDG_RUNTIME_DIR=
 LANG=en_US.UTF-8
 SHELL=/bin/bash
ProcKernelCmdLine: BOOT_IMAGE=/boot/vmlinuz-4.15.0-140-generic 
root=UUID=b85df775-5de2-47b0-843b-d2f8b1f71d5e ro quiet splash vt.handoff=7
SourcePackage: xorg
Symptom: display
Title: Xorg freeze
UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install)
dmi.bios.date: 10/27/2009
dmi.bios.vendor: Dell Inc.
dmi.bios.version: A17
dmi.board.vendor: Dell Inc.
dmi.chassis.type: 8
dmi.chassis.vendor: Dell Inc.
dmi.modalias: 
dmi:bvnDellInc.:bvrA17:bd10/27/2009:svnDellInc.:pnInspiron1525:pvr:rvnDellInc.:rn:rvr:cvnDellInc.:ct8:cvr:
dmi.product.name: Inspiron 1525
dmi.sys.vendor: Dell Inc.
version.compiz: compiz 1:0.9.12.3+16.04.20180221-0ubuntu1
version.libdrm2: libdrm2 2.4.91-2~16.04.1
version.libgl1-mesa-dri: libgl1-mesa-dri 18.0.5-0ubuntu0~16.04.1
version.libgl1-mesa-dri-experimental: libgl1-mesa-dri-experimental N/A
version.libgl1-mesa-glx: libgl1-mesa-glx 18.0.5-0ubuntu0~16.04.1
version.xserver-xorg-core: xserver-xorg-core N/A
version.xserver-xorg-input-evdev: xserver-xorg-input-evdev N/A
version.xserver-xorg-video-ati: xserver-xorg-video-ati N/A
version.xserver-xorg-video-intel: xserver-xorg-video-intel N/A
version.xserver-xorg-video-nouveau: xserver-xorg-video-nouveau N/A

** Affects: xorg (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New


** Tags: apport-bug compiz-0.9 false-gpu-hang freeze i386 ubuntu xenial

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to xorg in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1921385

Title:
  Xorg freeze

Status in xorg package in Ubuntu:
  New

Bug description:
  The boot program is very slow.
  An error dialog pops up simply stating there is a problem with the system.
  If I open the details a long long list of data is shown, way above my 
technical knowledge.

  ProblemType: Bug
  DistroRelease: Ubuntu 16.04
  Package: xorg 1:7.7+13ubuntu3.1
  ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 4.15.0-140.144~16.04.1-generic 4.15.18
  Uname: Linux 4.15.0-140-generic i686
  NonfreeKernelModules: wl
  .tmp.unity_support_test.0:
   
  ApportVersion: 2.20.1-0ubuntu2.30
  Architecture: i386
  CompizPlugins: No value set for 
`/apps/compiz-1/general/screen0/options/active_plugins'
  CompositorRunning: compiz
  CompositorUnredirectDriverBlacklist: '(nouveau|Intel).*Mesa 8.0'
  CompositorUnredirectFSW: true
  CurrentDesktop: Unity
  Date: Thu Mar 25 08:22:18 2021
  DistUpgraded: Fresh install
  DistroCodename: xenial
  DistroVariant: ubuntu
  DkmsStatus:
   bcmwl, 6.30.223.271+bdcom, 4.15.0-139-generic, i686: installed
   bcmwl, 6.30.223.271+bdcom, 4.15.0-140-generic, i686: installed
  ExtraDebuggingInterest: Yes, if not too technical
  GraphicsCard:
   Intel Corporation Mobile GM965/GL960 Integrated Graphics Controller 
(primary) [8086:2a02] (rev 0c) (prog-if 00 [VGA controller])
 Subsystem: Dell Inspiron 1525 [1028:022f]
 Subsystem: Dell Inspiron 1525 [1028:022f]
  InstallationDate: Installed on 2021-03-17 (7 days ago)
  InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 16.04.6 LTS "Xenial Xerus" - Release i386 
(20190227.1)
  MachineType: Dell Inc. Inspiron 1525
  ProcEnviron:
   LANGUAGE=en_US
   PATH=(custom, no user)
   XDG_RUNTIME_DIR=
   LANG=en_US.UTF-8
   SHELL=/bin/bash
  ProcKernelCmdLine: BOOT_IMAGE=/boot/vmlinuz-4.15.0-140-generic 
root=UUID=b85df775-5de2-47b0-843b-d2f8b1f71d5e ro quiet splash vt.handoff=7
  SourcePackage: xorg
  Symptom: display
  Title: Xorg freeze
  UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log 

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1918112] Re: Deal with rred shortcomings around empty patch files

2021-03-25 Thread Launchpad Bug Tracker
This bug was fixed in the package apt - 2.2.2

---
apt (2.2.2) unstable; urgency=medium

  [ David Kalnischkies ]
  * Deal with rred shortcomings around empty patch files (LP: #1918112)
- Allow merging with empty pdiff patches
- Rename pdiff merge patches only after they are all downloaded
- Start pdiff patching from the last possible starting point
- Ensure all index files sent custom tags to the methods
  * Harden test for no new acquires after transaction abort (Closes: #984966)

  [ Julian Andres Klode ]
  * Make ADDARG{,C}() macros expand to single statements

 -- Julian Andres Klode   Fri, 12 Mar 2021 09:15:59
+0100

** Changed in: apt (Ubuntu Hirsute)
   Status: New => Fix Released

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to apt in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1918112

Title:
  Deal with rred shortcomings around empty patch files

Status in apt package in Ubuntu:
  Fix Released
Status in apt source package in Focal:
  Won't Fix
Status in apt source package in Groovy:
  Won't Fix
Status in apt source package in Hirsute:
  Fix Released

Bug description:
  [Impact]
  Merge request https://salsa.debian.org/apt-team/apt/-/merge_requests/159 has 
a bunch of fixes for empty pdiff files, cleaning up pdiff files, as well as 
correcting some bugs with index files in the mirror method.

  While we don't use pdiffs ourselves, third party repositories might,
  and people might want to use rred on Ubuntu to create merged pdiff
  files, and hence benefit from those patches, so we want to backport it
  to 2.0, such that it is not more buggy than Debian's 1.8 and forces
  you to run Debian if you want to do those things.

  [Test plan]
  Each commit comes with a change to the test suite that tests it, and the test 
suite is fairly exhaustive too.

  [Where problems could occur]
  Changes are limited to adding headers to Index file downloads (so that mirror 
works correctly), and pdiff-specific code, so problems could occur with mirror 
method or pdiff.

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/apt/+bug/1918112/+subscriptions

-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
Post to : touch-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


[Touch-packages] [Bug 1915547] Re: Users are prompted by ucf on upgrade from Trusty to Xenial

2021-03-25 Thread Launchpad Bug Tracker
This bug was fixed in the package unattended-upgrades -
1.1ubuntu1.18.04.7~16.04.7

---
unattended-upgrades (1.1ubuntu1.18.04.7~16.04.7) xenial; urgency=medium

  * data: add md5sum history file on the data folder (LP: #1915547)
- This file contains the md5sum of the current xenial and trusty
  version of 50unattended-upgrades. This file will be used to avoid
  prompting users about unattended-upgrade changes when upgrading
  from trusty to xenial.
  * debian/postint: make ucf command reference the md5sum history file

 -- Lucas Moura   Wed, 10 Feb 2021 17:37:18
-0300

** Changed in: unattended-upgrades (Ubuntu Xenial)
   Status: Fix Committed => Fix Released

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to unattended-upgrades in
Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1915547

Title:
  Users are prompted by ucf on upgrade from Trusty to Xenial

Status in unattended-upgrades package in Ubuntu:
  Fix Released
Status in unattended-upgrades source package in Xenial:
  Fix Released

Bug description:
  [Impact]
  During an upgrade from trusty to xenial, users will be prompted to make a 
decision regarding the diff on unattended-upgrades. This is not a good user 
experience, specially because the user can make an uninformed decision of 
keeping the old config file, which will make unattended-upgrades to not work as 
we expect.

  [Test case]

  To reproduce the issue, you can:

  1. Launch a trusty vm
  2. Perform a do-release-upgrade and observe that you will be prompted with 
the 50unattended-upgrades change

  To verify that the error is fixed:

  1. Launch a trusty vm
  2. Import this ppa into the system:
 https://launchpad.net/~lamoura/+archive/ubuntu/unattended-upgrades-ppa
  3. Configure do-release-upgrade to allow using third parties during upgrade
  4. Run a do-release-upgrade
  5. Verify the prompt is no longer there and that we end up with the 
 expected 50unattended-upgrades config file

  [Where problems could occur]

  The changes in this package should only surface during an upgrade
  operation.  With this change, we are now delivering a new file to the
  system and configuring postinst to use it. Because of that, we believe
  this is the only scenario that could be affected in case of a
  regression is discovered in the package.

  
  [Discussion]
  When upgrading from trusty to xenial, we are prompted about config changes on 
50unattended-upgrades with the following diff:

  --- /etc/apt/apt.conf.d/50unattended-upgrades root.root 0644 2017-05-08 
19:21:39
  +++ /etc/apt/apt.conf.d/50unattended-upgrades.ucftmp root.root 0644 
2020-02-17 18:03:38
  @@ -1,11 +1,13 @@
   // Automatically upgrade packages from these (origin:archive) pairs
   Unattended-Upgrade::Allowed-Origins {
  + "${distro_id}:${distro_codename}";
   "${distro_id}:${distro_codename}-security";
   // Extended Security Maintenance; doesn't necessarily exist for
   // every release and this system may not have it installed, but if
   // available, the policy for updates is such that unattended-upgrades
   // should also install from here by default.
  - "${distro_id}ESM:${distro_codename}";
  + "${distro_id}ESMApps:${distro_codename}-apps-security";
  + "${distro_id}ESM:${distro_codename}-infra-security";
   // "${distro_id}:${distro_codename}-updates";
   // "${distro_id}:${distro_codename}-proposed";
   // "${distro_id}:${distro_codename}-backports";

  The reason we are presented with this diff is that the xenial package
  does not contain a md5sum history file that informs ucf about all the
  supported configs for 50unattended-upgrades. To fix that upgrade
  problem, we are prosing the following changes on the xenial package of
  unattended-upgrades:

  - Add 50unattended-upgrades.md5sum file into the xenial package
  - Add md5sum of the current xenial 50unattende-upgrades file into the 
md5sum history file
  - Modify ucf command in postinst to be aware of the md5sum history file

  See the changelog entry below for a full list of changes and bugs.

  We have performed a manual test with a modified version of the xenial package:
  https://launchpad.net/~lamoura/+archive/ubuntu/unattended-upgrades-ppa

  Using that package, we were able to verify that the config change
  prompt no longer happens from trusty to xenial.

  Since we are modifying are features on unattended-upgrades, just
  adding a new file to package, we don't believe there is any regression
  potential

  
  == Changelog ==

    * data: add md5sum history file on the data folder
  - This file contains md5sum of several supported 50unattended-upgrades
    config files
    * data: add xenial md5sum of 50unattented-upgrades into md5sum file
    * debian/postint: make ucf command reference the md5sum history file

To manage notifications about this bug go to:

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1915547] Update Released

2021-03-25 Thread Łukasz Zemczak
The verification of the Stable Release Update for unattended-upgrades
has completed successfully and the package is now being released to
-updates.  Subsequently, the Ubuntu Stable Release Updates Team is being
unsubscribed and will not receive messages about this bug report.  In
the event that you encounter a regression using the package from
-updates please report a new bug using ubuntu-bug and tag the bug report
regression-update so we can easily find any regressions.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to unattended-upgrades in
Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1915547

Title:
  Users are prompted by ucf on upgrade from Trusty to Xenial

Status in unattended-upgrades package in Ubuntu:
  Fix Released
Status in unattended-upgrades source package in Xenial:
  Fix Released

Bug description:
  [Impact]
  During an upgrade from trusty to xenial, users will be prompted to make a 
decision regarding the diff on unattended-upgrades. This is not a good user 
experience, specially because the user can make an uninformed decision of 
keeping the old config file, which will make unattended-upgrades to not work as 
we expect.

  [Test case]

  To reproduce the issue, you can:

  1. Launch a trusty vm
  2. Perform a do-release-upgrade and observe that you will be prompted with 
the 50unattended-upgrades change

  To verify that the error is fixed:

  1. Launch a trusty vm
  2. Import this ppa into the system:
 https://launchpad.net/~lamoura/+archive/ubuntu/unattended-upgrades-ppa
  3. Configure do-release-upgrade to allow using third parties during upgrade
  4. Run a do-release-upgrade
  5. Verify the prompt is no longer there and that we end up with the 
 expected 50unattended-upgrades config file

  [Where problems could occur]

  The changes in this package should only surface during an upgrade
  operation.  With this change, we are now delivering a new file to the
  system and configuring postinst to use it. Because of that, we believe
  this is the only scenario that could be affected in case of a
  regression is discovered in the package.

  
  [Discussion]
  When upgrading from trusty to xenial, we are prompted about config changes on 
50unattended-upgrades with the following diff:

  --- /etc/apt/apt.conf.d/50unattended-upgrades root.root 0644 2017-05-08 
19:21:39
  +++ /etc/apt/apt.conf.d/50unattended-upgrades.ucftmp root.root 0644 
2020-02-17 18:03:38
  @@ -1,11 +1,13 @@
   // Automatically upgrade packages from these (origin:archive) pairs
   Unattended-Upgrade::Allowed-Origins {
  + "${distro_id}:${distro_codename}";
   "${distro_id}:${distro_codename}-security";
   // Extended Security Maintenance; doesn't necessarily exist for
   // every release and this system may not have it installed, but if
   // available, the policy for updates is such that unattended-upgrades
   // should also install from here by default.
  - "${distro_id}ESM:${distro_codename}";
  + "${distro_id}ESMApps:${distro_codename}-apps-security";
  + "${distro_id}ESM:${distro_codename}-infra-security";
   // "${distro_id}:${distro_codename}-updates";
   // "${distro_id}:${distro_codename}-proposed";
   // "${distro_id}:${distro_codename}-backports";

  The reason we are presented with this diff is that the xenial package
  does not contain a md5sum history file that informs ucf about all the
  supported configs for 50unattended-upgrades. To fix that upgrade
  problem, we are prosing the following changes on the xenial package of
  unattended-upgrades:

  - Add 50unattended-upgrades.md5sum file into the xenial package
  - Add md5sum of the current xenial 50unattende-upgrades file into the 
md5sum history file
  - Modify ucf command in postinst to be aware of the md5sum history file

  See the changelog entry below for a full list of changes and bugs.

  We have performed a manual test with a modified version of the xenial package:
  https://launchpad.net/~lamoura/+archive/ubuntu/unattended-upgrades-ppa

  Using that package, we were able to verify that the config change
  prompt no longer happens from trusty to xenial.

  Since we are modifying are features on unattended-upgrades, just
  adding a new file to package, we don't believe there is any regression
  potential

  
  == Changelog ==

    * data: add md5sum history file on the data folder
  - This file contains md5sum of several supported 50unattended-upgrades
    config files
    * data: add xenial md5sum of 50unattented-upgrades into md5sum file
    * debian/postint: make ucf command reference the md5sum history file

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/unattended-upgrades/+bug/1915547/+subscriptions

-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
Post to : touch-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


[Touch-packages] [Bug 1615381] Autopkgtest regression report (apt/2.1.10ubuntu0.3)

2021-03-25 Thread Ubuntu SRU Bot
All autopkgtests for the newly accepted apt (2.1.10ubuntu0.3) for groovy have 
finished running.
The following regressions have been reported in tests triggered by the package:

reprotest/0.7.15 (arm64, s390x)
livecd-rootfs/2.694.3 (amd64, s390x)
dgit/9.11ubuntu1 (arm64)


Please visit the excuses page listed below and investigate the failures, 
proceeding afterwards as per the StableReleaseUpdates policy regarding 
autopkgtest regressions [1].

https://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-archive/proposed-
migration/groovy/update_excuses.html#apt

[1] https://wiki.ubuntu.com/StableReleaseUpdates#Autopkgtest_Regressions

Thank you!

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to unattended-upgrades in
Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1615381

Title:
  apt-get autoremove may remove current kernel

Status in apt package in Ubuntu:
  Fix Released
Status in unattended-upgrades package in Ubuntu:
  Fix Released
Status in unattended-upgrades source package in Trusty:
  Won't Fix
Status in unattended-upgrades source package in Xenial:
  Fix Released
Status in unattended-upgrades source package in Artful:
  Won't Fix
Status in apt source package in Bionic:
  Confirmed
Status in apt source package in Focal:
  Confirmed
Status in apt source package in Groovy:
  Fix Committed
Status in apt source package in Hirsute:
  Fix Released

Bug description:
  [Impact]
  APT will try and fail to remove the currently running kernel, when booted 
into an older kernel that is not protected. May wreak some havoc if mixed with 
other operations to the point that apt goes weird and needs manual fixing up.

  [Test case]
  For the SRUs we have included an automated test case that starts with an 
empty autoremove config file, and then checks that the running kernel is 
protected at runtime.

  You can also test manually, but it's not necessary:

  - Install new kernel
  - Reboot into kernel not listed as protected in 01autoremove-kernels
  - Run autoremove

  [Where problems could occur]
  We may more easily run out of space in /boot. hirsute has new autoremoval 
code that runs completely at runtime; but that seems a bit large to SRU after 
only a few weeks in hirsute. Hence, we should protect the current kernel _in 
addition_ to the other kernels, just like unattended-upgrades and 
update-manager do. This increases the risk of filling up /boot compared to 
older apt versions, but is at the same level as unattended-upgrades and 
update-manager.

  [Original bug report]

  This may happen, if you boot one of the older kernels, that is not
  protected by /etc/apt/apt.conf.d/01autoremove-kernels

  Workaround: run
  /etc/kernel/postinst.d/apt-auto-removal
  during each boot (e.g. by using cron).
  Note: The workaround breaks autoremoving feature of new unneeded kernels in  
unattended-upgrades i.e. the setting 
'Unattended-Upgrade::Remove-New-Unused-Dependencies "true"' (which is default 
in 16.04 unless 'Unattended-Upgrade::Remove-Unused-Dependencies "true"' is set 
in '/etc/apt/apt.conf.d/50unattended-upgrades'.

  In shell:

  $ uname -r
  4.4.0-22-generic
  $ apt-get -s autoremove
  NOTE: This is only a simulation!
    apt-get needs root privileges for real execution.
    Keep also in mind that locking is deactivated,
    so don't depend on the relevance to the real current situation!
  Reading package lists... Done
  Building dependency tree
  Reading state information... Done
  The following packages will be REMOVED:
    linux-headers-4.4.0-21 linux-headers-4.4.0-21-generic linux-headers-4.4.0-22
    linux-headers-4.4.0-22-generic linux-headers-4.4.0-31-generic
    linux-image-4.4.0-21-generic linux-image-4.4.0-22-generic
    linux-image-4.4.0-31-generic linux-image-extra-4.4.0-21-generic
    linux-image-extra-4.4.0-22-generic linux-image-extra-4.4.0-31-generic
  0 upgraded, 0 newly installed, 11 to remove and 13 not upgraded.

  ProblemType: Bug
  DistroRelease: Ubuntu 16.04
  Package: apt 1.2.12~ubuntu16.04.1
  ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 4.4.0-22.40-generic 4.4.8
  Uname: Linux 4.4.0-22-generic x86_64
  ApportVersion: 2.20.1-0ubuntu2.1
  Architecture: amd64
  CurrentDesktop: XFCE
  Date: Sun Aug 21 16:11:27 2016
  EcryptfsInUse: Yes
  InstallationDate: Installed on 2016-04-28 (114 days ago)
  InstallationMedia: Xubuntu 16.04 LTS "Xenial Xerus" - Release amd64 
(20160420.1)
  SourcePackage: apt
  UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install)
  modified.conffile..etc.kernel.postinst.d.apt-auto-removal: [modified]
  mtime.conffile..etc.kernel.postinst.d.apt-auto-removal: 
2016-07-30T12:15:32.706300

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/apt/+bug/1615381/+subscriptions

-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
Post to : touch-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


[Touch-packages] [Bug 1693900] Autopkgtest regression report (apt/2.1.10ubuntu0.3)

2021-03-25 Thread Ubuntu SRU Bot
All autopkgtests for the newly accepted apt (2.1.10ubuntu0.3) for groovy have 
finished running.
The following regressions have been reported in tests triggered by the package:

reprotest/0.7.15 (arm64, s390x)
livecd-rootfs/2.694.3 (amd64, s390x)
dgit/9.11ubuntu1 (arm64)


Please visit the excuses page listed below and investigate the failures, 
proceeding afterwards as per the StableReleaseUpdates policy regarding 
autopkgtest regressions [1].

https://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-archive/proposed-
migration/groovy/update_excuses.html#apt

[1] https://wiki.ubuntu.com/StableReleaseUpdates#Autopkgtest_Regressions

Thank you!

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to apt in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1693900

Title:
  apt-get update should return exit code != 0 on error

Status in apt package in Ubuntu:
  Fix Released
Status in apt source package in Xenial:
  New
Status in apt source package in Bionic:
  Triaged
Status in apt source package in Focal:
  Triaged
Status in apt source package in Groovy:
  Fix Committed

Bug description:
  [Impact]
  There is no way for scripts to run apt update and be sure that it was 
entirely successful.

  We introduce a new flag, --error-mode=any that makes apt update also
  error out on transient errors.

  [Test plan]
  We have included a test in the test-suite in 
test-apt-update-failure-propagation that ensures that warnings become errors.

  [Where problems could occur]
  If there's an issue some warnings for transient errors could become errors, 
or worse I suppose it's possible but unlikely for errors to be reported as 
warnings...

  Since the new behavior is behind a flag, regression potential for
  existing scripts is low if there is no bug.

  [Original bug report]

  When running 'apt-get update' (e.g. on a container install post-
  install script), apt-get return with exit code 0, even so it wasn't
  able to "update" properly. E.g.:

  + apt-get update
  Err:1 http://de.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu xenial InRelease
    Temporary failure resolving 'de.archive.ubuntu.com'
  Err:2 http://security.ubuntu.com/ubuntu xenial-security InRelease
    Temporary failure resolving 'security.ubuntu.com'
  Err:3 http://de.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu xenial-updates InRelease
    Temporary failure resolving 'de.archive.ubuntu.com'
  Reading package lists... Done
  W: Failed to fetch http://de.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/dists/xenial/InRelease 
 Temporary failure resolving 'de.archive.ubuntu.com'
  W: Failed to fetch 
http://de.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/dists/xenial-updates/InRelease  Temporary 
failure resolving 'de.archive.ubuntu.com'
  W: Failed to fetch 
http://security.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/dists/xenial-security/InRelease  Temporary 
failure resolving 'security.ubuntu.com'
  W: Some index files failed to download. They have been ignored, or old ones 
used instead.

  It should be corrected to return useful exit code, so that scripts can
  take the appropriate actions ...

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/apt/+bug/1693900/+subscriptions

-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
Post to : touch-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


[Touch-packages] [Bug 1907850] Autopkgtest regression report (apt/2.1.10ubuntu0.3)

2021-03-25 Thread Ubuntu SRU Bot
All autopkgtests for the newly accepted apt (2.1.10ubuntu0.3) for groovy have 
finished running.
The following regressions have been reported in tests triggered by the package:

reprotest/0.7.15 (arm64, s390x)
livecd-rootfs/2.694.3 (amd64, s390x)
dgit/9.11ubuntu1 (arm64)


Please visit the excuses page listed below and investigate the failures, 
proceeding afterwards as per the StableReleaseUpdates policy regarding 
autopkgtest regressions [1].

https://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-archive/proposed-
migration/groovy/update_excuses.html#apt

[1] https://wiki.ubuntu.com/StableReleaseUpdates#Autopkgtest_Regressions

Thank you!

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to apt in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1907850

Title:
  Cache not generated for all translations

Status in apt package in Ubuntu:
  Fix Released
Status in apt source package in Xenial:
  Confirmed
Status in apt source package in Bionic:
  Confirmed
Status in apt source package in Focal:
  Confirmed
Status in apt source package in Groovy:
  Fix Committed
Status in apt source package in Hirsute:
  Fix Released

Bug description:
  [Impact]
  In bug 1161743 we discovered that if a system is configured with multiple 
locales, only the locales of the user who generated the apt-cache will be 
available for translated descriptions.

  [Test case]
  An automated test case has been included as a snippet in  
test/integration/test-bug-49-search-in-all-translations which runs during 
autopkgtest. That's sufficient for validation.

  Manual test:

  # apt install locales-all # get the locale
  # export LANG=sv_SE.UTF-8
  # locale
  LANG=sv_SE.UTF-8
  LANGUAGE=
  LC_CTYPE="sv_SE.UTF-8"
  LC_NUMERIC="sv_SE.UTF-8"
  LC_TIME="sv_SE.UTF-8"
  LC_COLLATE="sv_SE.UTF-8"
  LC_MONETARY="sv_SE.UTF-8"
  LC_MESSAGES="sv_SE.UTF-8"
  LC_PAPER="sv_SE.UTF-8"
  LC_NAME="sv_SE.UTF-8"
  LC_ADDRESS="sv_SE.UTF-8"
  LC_TELEPHONE="sv_SE.UTF-8"
  LC_MEASUREMENT="sv_SE.UTF-8"
  LC_IDENTIFICATION="sv_SE.UTF-8"
  LC_ALL=
  # apt update
  # apt-cache show tasksel | grep Desc
  Description-sv: tool for selecting tasks for installation on Debian systems
  Description-md5: cbbb747708986d11ea77c80b9b038fec
  # apt-cache showpkg tasksel
  Package: tasksel
  Versions:
  3.34ubuntu16 
(/var/lib/apt/lists/archive.ubuntu.com_ubuntu_dists_groovy_main_binary-amd64_Packages)
   Description Language:
   File: 
/var/lib/apt/lists/archive.ubuntu.com_ubuntu_dists_groovy_main_binary-amd64_Packages
    MD5: cbbb747708986d11ea77c80b9b038fec
   Description Language: sv
   File: 
/var/lib/apt/lists/archive.ubuntu.com_ubuntu_dists_groovy_main_i18n_Translation-sv
    MD5: cbbb747708986d11ea77c80b9b038fec
   Description Language: en
   File: 
/var/lib/apt/lists/archive.ubuntu.com_ubuntu_dists_groovy_main_i18n_Translation-en
    MD5: cbbb747708986d11ea77c80b9b038fec
  [...]

  So far so good, but now assume the root user actually has C configured
  as locale, and e.g. runs apt-cache show (or apt-daily.service does an
  update):

  root@g:~# rm /var/cache/apt/*.bin
  root@g:~# LANG=C apt-cache  show tasksel
  [...]
  Description-en: tool for selecting tasks for installation on Debian systems
   This package provides 'tasksel', a simple interface for users who
   want to configure their system to perform a specific task.

  root@g:~# apt-cache  showpkg tasksel
  Package: tasksel
  Versions:
  3.34ubuntu16 
(/var/lib/apt/lists/archive.ubuntu.com_ubuntu_dists_groovy_main_binary-amd64_Packages)
   Description Language:
   File: 
/var/lib/apt/lists/archive.ubuntu.com_ubuntu_dists_groovy_main_binary-amd64_Packages
    MD5: cbbb747708986d11ea77c80b9b038fec
   Description Language: en
   File: 
/var/lib/apt/lists/archive.ubuntu.com_ubuntu_dists_groovy_main_i18n_Translation-en
    MD5: cbbb747708986d11ea77c80b9b038fec

  This should show the sv locale as well given that it's still around
  (also we are still running with LANG=sv_SE.UTF-8), but it only
  generated the cache with the english language description in here.

  [Where problems could occur]
  People might end up seeing a wrong translation if other code paths are wrong, 
but then they'd already see them if they explicitly configured multiple 
languages and then switched the preferred one.

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/apt/+bug/1907850/+subscriptions

-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
Post to : touch-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


[Touch-packages] [Bug 1898026] Autopkgtest regression report (apt/2.1.10ubuntu0.3)

2021-03-25 Thread Ubuntu SRU Bot
All autopkgtests for the newly accepted apt (2.1.10ubuntu0.3) for groovy have 
finished running.
The following regressions have been reported in tests triggered by the package:

reprotest/0.7.15 (arm64, s390x)
livecd-rootfs/2.694.3 (amd64, s390x)
dgit/9.11ubuntu1 (arm64)


Please visit the excuses page listed below and investigate the failures, 
proceeding afterwards as per the StableReleaseUpdates policy regarding 
autopkgtest regressions [1].

https://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-archive/proposed-
migration/groovy/update_excuses.html#apt

[1] https://wiki.ubuntu.com/StableReleaseUpdates#Autopkgtest_Regressions

Thank you!

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to apt in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1898026

Title:
  interruption of dist-upgrade can leave you next release in
  sources.list

Status in apt package in Ubuntu:
  Fix Released
Status in ubuntu-release-upgrader package in Ubuntu:
  Fix Released
Status in apt source package in Bionic:
  New
Status in ubuntu-release-upgrader source package in Bionic:
  New
Status in apt source package in Focal:
  New
Status in ubuntu-release-upgrader source package in Focal:
  New
Status in apt source package in Groovy:
  Fix Committed
Status in ubuntu-release-upgrader source package in Groovy:
  New
Status in apt source package in Hirsute:
  Fix Released
Status in ubuntu-release-upgrader source package in Hirsute:
  Fix Released

Bug description:
  [Impact]
  Calling update() or installing packages from apt clients resets their SIGINT 
and SIGQUIT handlers to SIG_DFL, overriding any signal handlers they might have 
set for them.

  In case of ubuntu-release-upgrader, this results in the release
  upgrader being unable to handle interrupts after it did the initial
  update - the default libc handler will run and the program exits.

  [Test plan]

  [[apt]]
  As a standalone test for apt, we can test the following script:

  import apt
  import time

  apt.Cache().update()
  print("WAITING")
  try:
  time.sleep(1)
  except BaseException as e:
  print("Seen", repr(e))
  print("END")

  Pressing Ctrl+C while WAITING is printed should print Seen
  KeyboardInterrupt, and importantly, also the END line.

  [Where problems could occur]
  apt: This specific change removes the two lines that SIG_DFL the signal 
handlers after running scripts. AFAWCT those lines are unnecessary - the code 
that calls it temporarily sets the handlers to SIG_IGN but restores previous 
handlers at the end; it was wrongly refactored decades ago. A regression could 
occur in that those signals will now continue to be ignored if we missed a spot.

  [Original bug report]
  As a long-time-user of ?ubuntu, with apt-get as tool of choice for 
updates/upgrades I wrote a daily script for updates, with 'dist-upgrade'.
  In all earlier years, it wouldn't actually do an upgrade of a ?ubuntu 
version; just all packages including new ones. Version updates had to be 
initiated manually, and I was always asked if I really wanted the new ?ubuntu 
version. Sounds appropriate.

  Last night when it (dist-upgrade), it just gave me 20.04. No questions asked. 
I for one consider this kind of intrusive, though.
  It *might* have to make with me trying 'sudo do-release-upgrade -m desktop' a 
number of times earlier; just to *check* if the upgrade was on offer; but this 
is only a guess.

  In *any* case, a pop-up asking "Are you sure? Are you connected
  through an adequate pipe? Are you sitting with full batteries; better
  a power supply?" would be convenient; since I am using my PC for
  urgent duties, and didn't want to fiddle with unexpected upgrade bugs.

  ProblemType: Bug
  DistroRelease: Ubuntu 20.04
  Package: ubuntu-release-upgrader-core 1:20.04.25
  ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 5.4.0-48.52-generic 5.4.60
  Uname: Linux 5.4.0-48-generic x86_64
  ApportVersion: 2.20.11-0ubuntu27.9
  Architecture: amd64
  CasperMD5CheckResult: skip
  CrashDB: ubuntu
  CurrentDesktop: KDE
  Date: Thu Oct  1 11:48:39 2020
  InstallationDate: Installed on 2019-03-14 (566 days ago)
  InstallationMedia: Kubuntu 18.04.1 LTS "Bionic Beaver" - Release amd64 
(20180725)
  PackageArchitecture: all
  SourcePackage: ubuntu-release-upgrader
  Symptom: ubuntu-release-upgrader
  UpgradeStatus: Upgraded to focal on 2020-09-29 (1 days ago)
  VarLogDistupgradeAptlog:
   Log time: 2020-09-29 19:44:28.696289
   Log time: 2020-09-29 19:44:33.573481

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/apt/+bug/1898026/+subscriptions

-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
Post to : touch-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


[Touch-packages] [Bug 1916050] Autopkgtest regression report (apt/2.1.10ubuntu0.3)

2021-03-25 Thread Ubuntu SRU Bot
All autopkgtests for the newly accepted apt (2.1.10ubuntu0.3) for groovy have 
finished running.
The following regressions have been reported in tests triggered by the package:

reprotest/0.7.15 (arm64, s390x)
livecd-rootfs/2.694.3 (amd64, s390x)
dgit/9.11ubuntu1 (arm64)


Please visit the excuses page listed below and investigate the failures, 
proceeding afterwards as per the StableReleaseUpdates policy regarding 
autopkgtest regressions [1].

https://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-archive/proposed-
migration/groovy/update_excuses.html#apt

[1] https://wiki.ubuntu.com/StableReleaseUpdates#Autopkgtest_Regressions

Thank you!

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to apt in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1916050

Title:
  Invalid base64 for high-bit characters

Status in apt package in Ubuntu:
  Fix Released
Status in apt source package in Xenial:
  Confirmed
Status in apt source package in Bionic:
  Confirmed
Status in apt source package in Focal:
  Confirmed
Status in apt source package in Groovy:
  Fix Committed
Status in apt source package in Hirsute:
  Fix Released

Bug description:
  [Impact]
  The Base64Encode function incorrectly encodes using char instead of uint8_t, 
leading to characters with the high bit set to be encoded wrongly. This 
function is used for base authentication, and high bits are set for UTF-8 
character sequences, so it's likely affecting people with utf-8 user names and 
passwords and might cause them to be denied access to their https resources 
(though arguably they'd work around that).

  [Test case]
  A unit test has been added that checks that the encoding is correct.

  [Where problems could occur]
  This only affects the base64 encoding function, which is only used for 
quoting user names and passwords in basic auth in http, but it's also exposed 
to library users and like in python-apt, so problems could occur wherever they 
use that base64 encoding function as well.

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/apt/+bug/1916050/+subscriptions

-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
Post to : touch-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


[Touch-packages] [Bug 1916725] Autopkgtest regression report (apt/2.1.10ubuntu0.3)

2021-03-25 Thread Ubuntu SRU Bot
All autopkgtests for the newly accepted apt (2.1.10ubuntu0.3) for groovy have 
finished running.
The following regressions have been reported in tests triggered by the package:

reprotest/0.7.15 (arm64, s390x)
livecd-rootfs/2.694.3 (amd64, s390x)
dgit/9.11ubuntu1 (arm64)


Please visit the excuses page listed below and investigate the failures, 
proceeding afterwards as per the StableReleaseUpdates policy regarding 
autopkgtest regressions [1].

https://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-archive/proposed-
migration/groovy/update_excuses.html#apt

[1] https://wiki.ubuntu.com/StableReleaseUpdates#Autopkgtest_Regressions

Thank you!

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to apt in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1916725

Title:
  Protected/Important packages are not deconfigured, require Force-
  LoopBreak

Status in apt package in Ubuntu:
  Fix Released
Status in apt source package in Bionic:
  Triaged
Status in apt source package in Focal:
  Triaged
Status in apt source package in Groovy:
  Fix Committed
Status in apt source package in Hirsute:
  Fix Released

Bug description:
  [Impact]
  If a package that is Protected: yes (or Important: yes), or one of it's 
dependencies, is involved in a dependency loop with Breaks, APT requires 
APT::Force-LoopBreak instead of resolving the situation directly.

  On focal, we also introduce the actual support for protected packages
  to enable upgrading to later releases more easily (in case a protected
  package needs to be removed during the upgrade), and to make the
  backport more similar to main.

  [Test plan]
  Run the integration test suite (the autopkgtest) :)

  Our test suite covers the tests for both Breaks and Conflicts.

  Breaks:

  protected-sysvinit (= 1) without dependencies is installed
  protected-sysvinit (= 2) Pre-Depends protected-systemd-sysv
  protected-systemd-sysv (= 2) Breaks: protected-sysvinit (<< 2)

  Test: Install protected-sysvinit (= 2)
  Expected result: Unpacking protected-sysvinit (= 2) deconfigures 
protected-sysvinit (= 1), and then we unpack and configure protected-sysvinit 
(= 2) and end up with a working system.

  Conflicts: As for Breaks, but the Conflicts will remove the package
  temporarily, requiring the use of APT::Force-LoopBreak option.

  For focal, we also do have a test to check that the Protected field is
  being used.

  [Where problems could occur]
  We now allow dpkg to automatically deconfigure protected packages. This 
should just make them behave like normal packages to APT's eye, but bugs I 
guess could occur somewhere in the APT/dpkg interaction (this only applies to 
releases with Protected support in dpkg, Important is not affected, it's always 
been "normal" for dpkg).

  During development, we accidentally simplified the patch so much that
  Conflicts did not require Force-LoopBreak for temporary removal. We
  fixed that, but it points out that there is a place where the loop
  break check happens that is a potential regression place.

  On focal, we pass additional flags to dpkg that focal's dpkg does not
  understand, however, we only do that if dpkg asserts it does that, so
  in practice, this should all work fine and the code path will only be
  taken with >=groovy dpkg.

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/apt/+bug/1916725/+subscriptions

-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
Post to : touch-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


[Touch-packages] [Bug 1918920] Autopkgtest regression report (apt/2.1.10ubuntu0.3)

2021-03-25 Thread Ubuntu SRU Bot
All autopkgtests for the newly accepted apt (2.1.10ubuntu0.3) for groovy have 
finished running.
The following regressions have been reported in tests triggered by the package:

reprotest/0.7.15 (arm64, s390x)
livecd-rootfs/2.694.3 (amd64, s390x)
dgit/9.11ubuntu1 (arm64)


Please visit the excuses page listed below and investigate the failures, 
proceeding afterwards as per the StableReleaseUpdates policy regarding 
autopkgtest regressions [1].

https://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-archive/proposed-
migration/groovy/update_excuses.html#apt

[1] https://wiki.ubuntu.com/StableReleaseUpdates#Autopkgtest_Regressions

Thank you!

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to apt in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1918920

Title:
  Harden test for no new acquires after transaction abort

Status in apt package in Ubuntu:
  Fix Committed
Status in apt source package in Bionic:
  New
Status in apt source package in Focal:
  New
Status in apt source package in Groovy:
  Fix Committed

Bug description:
  [Impact]
  test-pdiff-usage is somewhat flaky, especially on Debian, this makes it less 
flaky. No end user impact as it's a test-only change.

  [Test plan]
  Running autopkgtest, which runs our extensive integration test suite which 
includes the changed test.

  [Where problems could occur]
  No end user regression potential on its own, but might slightly change 
regression potential for future pdiff changes:

  Test approach is slightly different now. It still catches that updates
  fail correctly, but tests more concretely that a transaction was
  aborted rather than that no worker received work (which was not
  guaranteed, the work could be scheduled before it was aborted).

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/apt/+bug/1918920/+subscriptions

-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
Post to : touch-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


[Touch-packages] [Bug 1921064] Re: wget 1.19.4 corrupts large downloaded files

2021-03-25 Thread Tony Travis
Changing the URL from ftp:// to http:// allowed me to download the file 
successfully:
wget 
http://ftp.ncbi.nih.gov/snp/organisms/human_9606_b151_GRCh38p7/VCF/All_20180418.vcf.gz

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to wget in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1921064

Title:
  wget 1.19.4 corrupts large downloaded files

Status in wget package in Ubuntu:
  New

Bug description:
  In normal use, downloading small files, "wget" 1.19.4 works correctly
  under Ubuntu-MATE 18.04 LTS. The length and md5sums of downloaded
  files are correct. However, when attempting to download a larger 16GB
  .tar.gz file the length of the original file on the server is
  16336802611 bytes, but the downloaded file is 16463139667 bytes and
  the computed md5sum of the file does not match the stored md5sum of
  the file on the server:

  ionice -c idle wget --no-check-certificate 
ftp://ftp.ncbi.nih.gov/snp/organisms/human_9606_b151_GRCh38p7/VCF/All_20180418.vcf.gz
  --2021-03-23 16:22:12--  
ftp://ftp.ncbi.nih.gov/snp/organisms/human_9606_b151_GRCh38p7/VCF/All_20180418.vcf.gz
 => ‘All_20180418.vcf.gz’
  Resolving ftp.ncbi.nih.gov (ftp.ncbi.nih.gov)... 130.14.250.11, 
130.14.250.13, 2607:f220:41e:250::11, ...
  Connecting to ftp.ncbi.nih.gov (ftp.ncbi.nih.gov)|130.14.250.11|:21... 
connected.
  Logging in as anonymous ... Logged in!
  ==> SYST ... done.==> PWD ... done.
  ==> TYPE I ... done.  ==> CWD (1) /snp/organisms/human_9606_b151_GRCh38p7/VCF 
... done.
  ==> SIZE All_20180418.vcf.gz ... 16336802611
  ==> PASV ... done.==> RETR All_20180418.vcf.gz ... done.
  Length: 16336802611 (15G) (unauthoritative)

  All_20180418.vcf.gz
  
100%[>]
  15.33G   939KB/sin 2h 7m

  2021-03-23 18:29:25 (2.06 MB/s) - ‘All_20180418.vcf.gz’ saved
  [16463139667]

  Repeating the same download using "wget" 1.20.3 under Ubuntu-MATE
  20.04 LTS, the file length and md5sum are correct.

  ProblemType: Bug
  DistroRelease: Ubuntu 18.04
  Package: wget 1.19.4-1ubuntu2.2
  ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 5.4.0-66.74~18.04.2-generic 5.4.86
  Uname: Linux 5.4.0-66-generic x86_64
  NonfreeKernelModules: zfs zunicode zavl icp zcommon znvpair nvidia_modeset 
nvidia
  ApportVersion: 2.20.9-0ubuntu7.23
  Architecture: amd64
  Date: Wed Mar 24 02:32:49 2021
  InstallationDate: Installed on 2020-08-03 (232 days ago)
  InstallationMedia: Ubuntu-MATE 20.04 LTS "Focal Fossa" - Release amd64 
(20200423)
  ProcEnviron:
   LANGUAGE=en_GB:en
   TERM=xterm-256color
   PATH=(custom, no user)
   LANG=en_GB.UTF-8
   SHELL=/bin/bash
  SourcePackage: wget
  UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install)

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/wget/+bug/1921064/+subscriptions

-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
Post to : touch-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


[Touch-packages] [Bug 1921350] [NEW] UFW hangs indefinitely on any action

2021-03-25 Thread Daniel Sjöblom
Public bug reported:

When installing a new cloudserver (on Amazon EC2, if it makes a
difference), UFW completely hangs on any command, for example ufw
status. Interrupting it with Ctrl+C yields this backtrace:

Traceback (most recent call last):
  File "/usr/sbin/ufw", line 130, in 
lock = create_lock(lockfile=lockfile, dryrun=pr.dryrun)
  File "/usr/lib/python3/dist-packages/ufw/util.py", line 1112, in create_lock
fcntl.lockf(lock, fcntl.LOCK_EX)
KeyboardInterrupt

The line numbers are always the same.

The platform is Ubuntu Server 20.04 (Ubuntu 20.04.2 LTS), from the
Amazon image. I have not seen this bug on other servers. UFW is version
0.36.

** Affects: ufw (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to ufw in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1921350

Title:
  UFW hangs indefinitely on any action

Status in ufw package in Ubuntu:
  New

Bug description:
  When installing a new cloudserver (on Amazon EC2, if it makes a
  difference), UFW completely hangs on any command, for example ufw
  status. Interrupting it with Ctrl+C yields this backtrace:

  Traceback (most recent call last):
File "/usr/sbin/ufw", line 130, in 
  lock = create_lock(lockfile=lockfile, dryrun=pr.dryrun)
File "/usr/lib/python3/dist-packages/ufw/util.py", line 1112, in create_lock
  fcntl.lockf(lock, fcntl.LOCK_EX)
  KeyboardInterrupt

  The line numbers are always the same.

  The platform is Ubuntu Server 20.04 (Ubuntu 20.04.2 LTS), from the
  Amazon image. I have not seen this bug on other servers. UFW is
  version 0.36.

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ufw/+bug/1921350/+subscriptions

-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
Post to : touch-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


  1   2   >