Re: [Touch-packages] [Bug 2036358] Re: systemd wait-online now times out after jammy and lunar upgrade

2023-12-09 Thread Steve Langasek
On Sun, Dec 10, 2023 at 01:45:36AM -, Roger Nelson wrote:
> I'm curious if this bug is still being investigated. RPI4 with wlan0,
> eth0 and eth1 (USB3 using r8152 driver) definitely manifests this bug. I
> need to wait ~30 minutes before either wlan0 or eth0 becomes available
> in order to restart systemd-networkd to activate eth1 and then ip link
> set up eth1.

This bug report is about a change in behavior of the systemd wait-online
target at boot.  "Need to wait 30 minutes before network device becomes
available" sounds unrelated.  You should file a separate bug report for your
issue.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to systemd in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2036358

Title:
  systemd wait-online now times out after jammy and lunar upgrade

Status in systemd package in Ubuntu:
  Invalid
Status in systemd source package in Jammy:
  Fix Released
Status in systemd source package in Lunar:
  Fix Released

Bug description:
  [NOTE]

  If you are running a desktop system and you see this issue, you should
  run:

  $ systemctl disable --now systemd-networkd.service

  This will disable systemd-networkd and associated units, including
  systemd-networkd-wait-online.service. NetworkManager and systemd-
  networkd should not be running at the same time. On desktop,
  NetworkManager is the default network stack.

  [Impact]

  When all interfaces are "not required for online", e.g. when they are
  marked "optional: true" in netplan, systemd-networkd-wait-online will
  timeout. Or, in other words, systemd-networkd-wait-online will timeout
  even though all interfaces are ignored, hence none of them will ever
  be marked as "ready." Depending on what units depend on network-
  online.target, this can delay boot by 120 seconds (the default timeout
  for systemd-networkd-wait-online).

  [Test Plan]

  1. Create a new LXD container. These instructions assume jammy is the
  release, but the same can be done for lunar.

  $ lxc launch ubuntu-daily:jammy jammy
  $ lxc exec jammy bash

  2. Once in the container, modify the default /etc/netplan/10-lxc.yaml
  so that eth0 is configured with "optional: true":

  $ vi /etc/netplan/50-cloud-init.yaml # Use whatever editor you like
  $ cat /etc/netplan/50-cloud-init.yaml
  network:
    version: 2
    ethernets:
  eth0:
    dhcp4: true
    dhcp-identifier: mac
    optional: true

  3. Re-generate and apply the netplan configuration.

  $ netplan generate
  $ netplan apply

  4. Manually run systemd-networkd-wait-online, and observe that all
  links are ignored, and the command times out:

  $ SYSTEMD_LOG_LEVEL=debug /lib/systemd/systemd-networkd-wait-online 
--timeout=10
  Found link lo(1)
  Found link eth0(19)
  lo: link is ignored
  eth0: link is ignored
  Timeout occurred while waiting for network connectivity.

  [Where problems could occur]

  This patch partially re-instates a patch remove in bug 1982218.
  However, instead of exiting if all links are unmanaged, we exit if all
  links are ignored in manager_configured(). If the patch was wrong, we
  may re-introduce bug 1982218, so as part of this SRU verification,
  that bug should be tested too. Any other regressions would also be
  related to systemd-networkd-wait-online behavior.

  [Original Description]

  On Ubuntu 22.04 desktop system using network-manager and upgrading to
  systemd 249.11-0ubuntu3.10, wait-online now times out which prevents
  logins (GDM, ssh, console) until it does time out. This seems to be
  introduced by the change for
  https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/systemd/+bug/1982218.

  https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/systemd/+bug/1982218/comments/21
  also mentioned the problem on Lunar.

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/systemd/+bug/2036358/+subscriptions


-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
Post to : touch-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


[Touch-packages] [Bug 2046055] [NEW] Sound is not coming on startup and after that

2023-12-09 Thread Srinivasan P
Public bug reported:

Sound is not coming in initial start up and after that and also pulse
audio is not opening

ProblemType: Bug
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 23.10
Package: pulseaudio 1:16.1+dfsg1-2ubuntu4 [modified: 
usr/share/pulseaudio/alsa-mixer/paths/analog-output-speaker.conf]
ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 6.5.0-14.14-generic 6.5.3
Uname: Linux 6.5.0-14-generic x86_64
ApportVersion: 2.27.0-0ubuntu5
Architecture: amd64
AudioDevicesInUse:
 USERPID ACCESS COMMAND
 /dev/snd/seq:srinivasan   1157 F pipewire
CasperMD5CheckResult: unknown
CurrentDesktop: ubuntu:GNOME
Date: Sun Dec 10 09:27:33 2023
InstallationDate: Installed on 2021-01-04 (1069 days ago)
InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 20.04.1 LTS "Focal Fossa" - Release amd64 (20200731)
PulseList: Error: command ['pacmd', 'list'] failed with exit code 1: No 
PulseAudio daemon running, or not running as session daemon.
SourcePackage: pulseaudio
Symptom: audio
UpgradeStatus: Upgraded to mantic on 2023-12-04 (6 days ago)
dmi.bios.date: 07/05/2010
dmi.bios.release: 6.4
dmi.bios.vendor: American Megatrends Inc.
dmi.bios.version: 6.04
dmi.board.name: 2A8C
dmi.board.vendor: FOXCONN
dmi.board.version: 1.0
dmi.chassis.type: 3
dmi.chassis.vendor: Hewlett-Packard
dmi.modalias: 
dmi:bvnAmericanMegatrendsInc.:bvr6.04:bd07/05/2010:br6.4:svnHewlett-Packard:pn:pvr:rvnFOXCONN:rn2A8C:rvr1.0:cvnHewlett-Packard:ct3:cvr:sku:
dmi.product.family: 103C_53316J G=D
dmi.sys.vendor: Hewlett-Packard

** Affects: pulseaudio (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New


** Tags: amd64 apport-bug mantic third-party-packages wayland-session

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to pulseaudio in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2046055

Title:
  Sound is not coming on startup and after that

Status in pulseaudio package in Ubuntu:
  New

Bug description:
  Sound is not coming in initial start up and after that and also pulse
  audio is not opening

  ProblemType: Bug
  DistroRelease: Ubuntu 23.10
  Package: pulseaudio 1:16.1+dfsg1-2ubuntu4 [modified: 
usr/share/pulseaudio/alsa-mixer/paths/analog-output-speaker.conf]
  ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 6.5.0-14.14-generic 6.5.3
  Uname: Linux 6.5.0-14-generic x86_64
  ApportVersion: 2.27.0-0ubuntu5
  Architecture: amd64
  AudioDevicesInUse:
   USERPID ACCESS COMMAND
   /dev/snd/seq:srinivasan   1157 F pipewire
  CasperMD5CheckResult: unknown
  CurrentDesktop: ubuntu:GNOME
  Date: Sun Dec 10 09:27:33 2023
  InstallationDate: Installed on 2021-01-04 (1069 days ago)
  InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 20.04.1 LTS "Focal Fossa" - Release amd64 (20200731)
  PulseList: Error: command ['pacmd', 'list'] failed with exit code 1: No 
PulseAudio daemon running, or not running as session daemon.
  SourcePackage: pulseaudio
  Symptom: audio
  UpgradeStatus: Upgraded to mantic on 2023-12-04 (6 days ago)
  dmi.bios.date: 07/05/2010
  dmi.bios.release: 6.4
  dmi.bios.vendor: American Megatrends Inc.
  dmi.bios.version: 6.04
  dmi.board.name: 2A8C
  dmi.board.vendor: FOXCONN
  dmi.board.version: 1.0
  dmi.chassis.type: 3
  dmi.chassis.vendor: Hewlett-Packard
  dmi.modalias: 
dmi:bvnAmericanMegatrendsInc.:bvr6.04:bd07/05/2010:br6.4:svnHewlett-Packard:pn:pvr:rvnFOXCONN:rn2A8C:rvr1.0:cvnHewlett-Packard:ct3:cvr:sku:
  dmi.product.family: 103C_53316J G=D
  dmi.sys.vendor: Hewlett-Packard

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/pulseaudio/+bug/2046055/+subscriptions


-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
Post to : touch-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


[Touch-packages] [Bug 2036358] Abwesenheitsnachricht

2023-12-09 Thread Hans-Peter Schmidt
Guten Tag!

Ich bin am 12.12.2023 wieder im Büro.
Ihre Nachricht wird NICHT automatisch weitergeleitet.

In dringenden Fällen wenden Sie sich bitte an Markus Delorenzo:
+43-5232-2208-39
md(@)ruetz.at

Mit freundlichen Grüßen
Hans-Peter Schmidt

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to systemd in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2036358

Title:
  systemd wait-online now times out after jammy and lunar upgrade

Status in systemd package in Ubuntu:
  Invalid
Status in systemd source package in Jammy:
  Fix Released
Status in systemd source package in Lunar:
  Fix Released

Bug description:
  [NOTE]

  If you are running a desktop system and you see this issue, you should
  run:

  $ systemctl disable --now systemd-networkd.service

  This will disable systemd-networkd and associated units, including
  systemd-networkd-wait-online.service. NetworkManager and systemd-
  networkd should not be running at the same time. On desktop,
  NetworkManager is the default network stack.

  [Impact]

  When all interfaces are "not required for online", e.g. when they are
  marked "optional: true" in netplan, systemd-networkd-wait-online will
  timeout. Or, in other words, systemd-networkd-wait-online will timeout
  even though all interfaces are ignored, hence none of them will ever
  be marked as "ready." Depending on what units depend on network-
  online.target, this can delay boot by 120 seconds (the default timeout
  for systemd-networkd-wait-online).

  [Test Plan]

  1. Create a new LXD container. These instructions assume jammy is the
  release, but the same can be done for lunar.

  $ lxc launch ubuntu-daily:jammy jammy
  $ lxc exec jammy bash

  2. Once in the container, modify the default /etc/netplan/10-lxc.yaml
  so that eth0 is configured with "optional: true":

  $ vi /etc/netplan/50-cloud-init.yaml # Use whatever editor you like
  $ cat /etc/netplan/50-cloud-init.yaml
  network:
    version: 2
    ethernets:
  eth0:
    dhcp4: true
    dhcp-identifier: mac
    optional: true

  3. Re-generate and apply the netplan configuration.

  $ netplan generate
  $ netplan apply

  4. Manually run systemd-networkd-wait-online, and observe that all
  links are ignored, and the command times out:

  $ SYSTEMD_LOG_LEVEL=debug /lib/systemd/systemd-networkd-wait-online 
--timeout=10
  Found link lo(1)
  Found link eth0(19)
  lo: link is ignored
  eth0: link is ignored
  Timeout occurred while waiting for network connectivity.

  [Where problems could occur]

  This patch partially re-instates a patch remove in bug 1982218.
  However, instead of exiting if all links are unmanaged, we exit if all
  links are ignored in manager_configured(). If the patch was wrong, we
  may re-introduce bug 1982218, so as part of this SRU verification,
  that bug should be tested too. Any other regressions would also be
  related to systemd-networkd-wait-online behavior.

  [Original Description]

  On Ubuntu 22.04 desktop system using network-manager and upgrading to
  systemd 249.11-0ubuntu3.10, wait-online now times out which prevents
  logins (GDM, ssh, console) until it does time out. This seems to be
  introduced by the change for
  https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/systemd/+bug/1982218.

  https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/systemd/+bug/1982218/comments/21
  also mentioned the problem on Lunar.

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/systemd/+bug/2036358/+subscriptions


-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
Post to : touch-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


[Touch-packages] [Bug 2036358] Re: systemd wait-online now times out after jammy and lunar upgrade

2023-12-09 Thread Roger Nelson
I'm curious if this bug is still being investigated. RPI4 with wlan0,
eth0 and eth1 (USB3 using r8152 driver) definitely manifests this bug. I
need to wait ~30 minutes before either wlan0 or eth0 becomes available
in order to restart systemd-networkd to activate eth1 and then ip link
set up eth1. At that point the network appears stable until next reboot.

IDX LINK TYPE OPERATIONAL SETUP
  1 lo   loopback carrier unmanaged
  2 eth0 etherroutableconfigured
  4 wlan0wlan routableunmanaged
  5 tun0 none routableunmanaged
  6 docker0  bridge   routableunmanaged
  8 vethd334874  etherdegradedunmanaged
  9 eth1 etherroutableconfigured
 14 veth1a9ad92  etherdegradedunmanaged
 16 vethe09f689  etherdegradedunmanaged
 18 veth592971d  etherdegradedunmanaged
 19 macvlan-shim etherroutableunmanaged
 21 vethafb615d  etherdegradedunmanaged

I hesitate using the word arbitrary but given how RPI4 utilizes both
networkmanager and networkd it appears arbitrary to state that only
networkmanager should be used in a desktop installation - at least I
cannot find any documentation that supports not using both
simultaneously. That said, I have been running this configuration for at
least 2 years without issue *until* systemd was updated.

I'm a new Ubuntu-One user and this is my first post after waiting
patiently for post #52 & #58 to get responses from anyone - so please
forgive (and forget :). Constructive criticism humbly accepted.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to systemd in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2036358

Title:
  systemd wait-online now times out after jammy and lunar upgrade

Status in systemd package in Ubuntu:
  Invalid
Status in systemd source package in Jammy:
  Fix Released
Status in systemd source package in Lunar:
  Fix Released

Bug description:
  [NOTE]

  If you are running a desktop system and you see this issue, you should
  run:

  $ systemctl disable --now systemd-networkd.service

  This will disable systemd-networkd and associated units, including
  systemd-networkd-wait-online.service. NetworkManager and systemd-
  networkd should not be running at the same time. On desktop,
  NetworkManager is the default network stack.

  [Impact]

  When all interfaces are "not required for online", e.g. when they are
  marked "optional: true" in netplan, systemd-networkd-wait-online will
  timeout. Or, in other words, systemd-networkd-wait-online will timeout
  even though all interfaces are ignored, hence none of them will ever
  be marked as "ready." Depending on what units depend on network-
  online.target, this can delay boot by 120 seconds (the default timeout
  for systemd-networkd-wait-online).

  [Test Plan]

  1. Create a new LXD container. These instructions assume jammy is the
  release, but the same can be done for lunar.

  $ lxc launch ubuntu-daily:jammy jammy
  $ lxc exec jammy bash

  2. Once in the container, modify the default /etc/netplan/10-lxc.yaml
  so that eth0 is configured with "optional: true":

  $ vi /etc/netplan/50-cloud-init.yaml # Use whatever editor you like
  $ cat /etc/netplan/50-cloud-init.yaml
  network:
    version: 2
    ethernets:
  eth0:
    dhcp4: true
    dhcp-identifier: mac
    optional: true

  3. Re-generate and apply the netplan configuration.

  $ netplan generate
  $ netplan apply

  4. Manually run systemd-networkd-wait-online, and observe that all
  links are ignored, and the command times out:

  $ SYSTEMD_LOG_LEVEL=debug /lib/systemd/systemd-networkd-wait-online 
--timeout=10
  Found link lo(1)
  Found link eth0(19)
  lo: link is ignored
  eth0: link is ignored
  Timeout occurred while waiting for network connectivity.

  [Where problems could occur]

  This patch partially re-instates a patch remove in bug 1982218.
  However, instead of exiting if all links are unmanaged, we exit if all
  links are ignored in manager_configured(). If the patch was wrong, we
  may re-introduce bug 1982218, so as part of this SRU verification,
  that bug should be tested too. Any other regressions would also be
  related to systemd-networkd-wait-online behavior.

  [Original Description]

  On Ubuntu 22.04 desktop system using network-manager and upgrading to
  systemd 249.11-0ubuntu3.10, wait-online now times out which prevents
  logins (GDM, ssh, console) until it does time out. This seems to be
  introduced by the change for
  https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/systemd/+bug/1982218.

  https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/systemd/+bug/1982218/comments/21
  also mentioned the problem on Lunar.

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/systemd/+bug/2036358/+subscriptions


-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
Post to : 

[Touch-packages] [Bug 2045931] Re: ps3 sixasis controller request pin to connect to bt

2023-12-09 Thread emptythevoid
Exact same behavior, and exact same fix.  On 5.64-0ubuntu1.1, the
connection attempt results in a PIN prompt ( doesn't work).  It
*does* still work over USB.

Per OP, I tried downgrading to 5.64-0ubuntu1 *immediately* corrected the
problem.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to bluez in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2045931

Title:
  ps3 sixasis controller request pin to connect to bt

Status in bluez package in Ubuntu:
  Incomplete

Bug description:
  Once my Ubuntu updated bluez package to 5.64-0ubuntu1.1 I was not able
  to connect my PS3 Sixasis controller via bluetooth. It is aking to
  enter a PIN in the device (not possible to enter a pin in the
  gamepad).

  Source pacakge (from "apt list -a bluez"):

  bluez/jammy-updates,jammy-security 5.64-0ubuntu1.1 amd64

  Once downgraded to 5.64-0ubuntu1 version, gamepad connects OK again
  without asking for a connection PIN.

  Ubuntu release:
  Description:  Ubuntu 22.04.3 LTS
  Release:  22.04

  Package version:
  bluez:
Installed: 5.64-0ubuntu1.1

  Expected to happen:
  Connect PS3 Controller by Bluetooth without asking for a PIN code

  Happened instead:
  PS3 Controller cannot connect because PIN code is requested

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/bluez/+bug/2045931/+subscriptions


-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
Post to : touch-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


[Touch-packages] [Bug 2031252] Re: Playing video with audio freezes

2023-12-09 Thread Gary Godfrey
I've been having this issue since updating to mantic - the sound to HDMI
just freezes and any application that is writing to it also freezes.  If
I do (from a terminal):

systemctl restart --user wireplumber.service

It comes back for a while.

I'm also running on a Lenovo X1 Carbon 7th generation.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to alsa-driver in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2031252

Title:
  Playing video with audio freezes

Status in alsa-driver package in Ubuntu:
  New

Bug description:
  I'm not sure when this started, but any video I play with audio is not
  working properly - it severely lags and/or freezes. This happens in
  Youtube on both Chrome and Firefox, and in the regular GNOME media
  player. Audio by itself works fine, and video with audio muted works
  fine. I tried restarting and downgrading the kernel, to no avail.

  ProblemType: Bug
  DistroRelease: Ubuntu 23.04
  Package: alsa-base 1.0.25+dfsg-0ubuntu7
  ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 6.2.0-26.26-generic 6.2.13
  Uname: Linux 6.2.0-26-generic x86_64
  ApportVersion: 2.26.1-0ubuntu2
  Architecture: amd64
  AudioDevicesInUse:
   USERPID ACCESS COMMAND
   /dev/snd/controlC0:  ari2679 F pipewire
ari2700 F wireplumber
   /dev/snd/seq:ari2679 F pipewire
  CasperMD5CheckResult: pass
  CurrentDesktop: ubuntu:GNOME
  Date: Sun Aug 13 17:22:56 2023
  InstallationDate: Installed on 2022-06-07 (432 days ago)
  InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 22.04 LTS "Jammy Jellyfish" - Release amd64 
(20220419)
  PackageArchitecture: all
  ProcEnviron:
   LANG=en_US.UTF-8
   PATH=(custom, no user)
   SHELL=/bin/zsh
   TERM=xterm-256color
   XDG_RUNTIME_DIR=
  SourcePackage: alsa-driver
  Symptom: audio
  UpgradeStatus: Upgraded to lunar on 2023-07-20 (23 days ago)
  dmi.bios.date: 06/12/2023
  dmi.bios.release: 1.61
  dmi.bios.vendor: LENOVO
  dmi.bios.version: N32ET85W (1.61 )
  dmi.board.asset.tag: Not Available
  dmi.board.name: 20XWCTO1WW
  dmi.board.vendor: LENOVO
  dmi.board.version: Not Defined
  dmi.chassis.asset.tag: No Asset Information
  dmi.chassis.type: 10
  dmi.chassis.vendor: LENOVO
  dmi.chassis.version: None
  dmi.ec.firmware.release: 1.34
  dmi.modalias: 
dmi:bvnLENOVO:bvrN32ET85W(1.61):bd06/12/2023:br1.61:efr1.34:svnLENOVO:pn20XWCTO1WW:pvrThinkPadX1CarbonGen9:rvnLENOVO:rn20XWCTO1WW:rvrNotDefined:cvnLENOVO:ct10:cvrNone:skuLENOVO_MT_20XW_BU_Think_FM_ThinkPadX1CarbonGen9:
  dmi.product.family: ThinkPad X1 Carbon Gen 9
  dmi.product.name: 20XWCTO1WW
  dmi.product.sku: LENOVO_MT_20XW_BU_Think_FM_ThinkPad X1 Carbon Gen 9
  dmi.product.version: ThinkPad X1 Carbon Gen 9
  dmi.sys.vendor: LENOVO

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/alsa-driver/+bug/2031252/+subscriptions


-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
Post to : touch-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


[Touch-packages] [Bug 2045931] Re: ps3 sixasis controller request pin to connect to bt

2023-12-09 Thread Daltro Augusto
I'm having this bug as well. It is a bug cause with current version
Dualshock 3 just doesn't connect, even if you do enter the  PIN
code.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to bluez in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2045931

Title:
  ps3 sixasis controller request pin to connect to bt

Status in bluez package in Ubuntu:
  Incomplete

Bug description:
  Once my Ubuntu updated bluez package to 5.64-0ubuntu1.1 I was not able
  to connect my PS3 Sixasis controller via bluetooth. It is aking to
  enter a PIN in the device (not possible to enter a pin in the
  gamepad).

  Source pacakge (from "apt list -a bluez"):

  bluez/jammy-updates,jammy-security 5.64-0ubuntu1.1 amd64

  Once downgraded to 5.64-0ubuntu1 version, gamepad connects OK again
  without asking for a connection PIN.

  Ubuntu release:
  Description:  Ubuntu 22.04.3 LTS
  Release:  22.04

  Package version:
  bluez:
Installed: 5.64-0ubuntu1.1

  Expected to happen:
  Connect PS3 Controller by Bluetooth without asking for a PIN code

  Happened instead:
  PS3 Controller cannot connect because PIN code is requested

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/bluez/+bug/2045931/+subscriptions


-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
Post to : touch-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


[Touch-packages] [Bug 2045586] Re: livecd-rootfs uses losetup -P for theoretically reliable/synchronous partition setup but it's not reliable in noble

2023-12-09 Thread Steve Langasek
Oh.  To the question of whether there was a systemd change in this
window: yes absolutely, because this is the point at which the riscv64
builders moved from lgw manually-operated qemu with a 20.04 guest image,
to bos03 openstack-operated qemu with a 22.04 guest image.

Which is also why we've moved from 5.13.0-1019-generic to
5.19.0-1021-generic.

But again, it was my understanding that these devices are supposed to be
created synchronously WITHOUT the involvement of udev.  In fact, we had
to make launchpad-buildd changes to make use of these devices at all
because udev would NOT set them up for us.

So if these are now being set up via udev, that's a significant
departure from expectations and it's not clear we even CAN have
synchronous behavior given that they would be set up by the host udev
and not the udev in the lxd container!

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to util-linux in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2045586

Title:
  livecd-rootfs uses losetup -P for theoretically reliable/synchronous
  partition setup but it's not reliable in noble

Status in linux package in Ubuntu:
  New
Status in livecd-rootfs package in Ubuntu:
  New
Status in util-linux package in Ubuntu:
  New

Bug description:
  In mantic, we migrated livecd-rootfs to use losetup -P instead of
  kpartx, with the expectation that this would give us a reliable, race-
  free way of loop-mounting partitions from a disk image during image
  build.

  In noble, we are finding that it is no longer reliable, and in fact
  fails rather often.

  It is most noticeable with riscv64 builds, which is the architecture
  where we most frequently ran into problems before with kpartx.  The
  first riscv64+generic build in noble where the expected loop partition
  device is not available is

https://launchpad.net/~ubuntu-
  cdimage/+livefs/ubuntu/noble/cpc/+build/531790

  The failure is however not unique to riscv64, and the autopkgtest for
  the latest version of livecd-rootfs (24.04.7) - an update that
  specifically tries to add more debugging code for this scenario - has
  also failed on ppc64el.

https://autopkgtest.ubuntu.com/packages/l/livecd-
  rootfs/noble/ppc64el

  The first failure happened on November 16.  While there has been an
  update to the util-linux package in noble, this did not land until
  November 23.

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/2045586/+subscriptions


-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
Post to : touch-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


Re: [Touch-packages] [Bug 2045586] Re: livecd-rootfs uses losetup -P for theoretically reliable/synchronous partition setup but it's not reliable in noble

2023-12-09 Thread Steve Langasek
On Sat, Dec 09, 2023 at 05:13:28PM -, Andy Whitcroft wrote:
> Was there any systemd/udev change in this timeframe?  As the device
> files are very much connected to those.

My understanding is that these devices are supposed to be created directly
by the kernel on devtmpfs and NOT via udev, which is part of how we expected
to fix the earlier races.

And systemd did not change in this time frame in any release.  If there was
a change to the HOST udev in this timeframe causing a regression because a
new base image was published that includes a newer udev, we don't have
visibility on it.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to util-linux in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2045586

Title:
  livecd-rootfs uses losetup -P for theoretically reliable/synchronous
  partition setup but it's not reliable in noble

Status in linux package in Ubuntu:
  New
Status in livecd-rootfs package in Ubuntu:
  New
Status in util-linux package in Ubuntu:
  New

Bug description:
  In mantic, we migrated livecd-rootfs to use losetup -P instead of
  kpartx, with the expectation that this would give us a reliable, race-
  free way of loop-mounting partitions from a disk image during image
  build.

  In noble, we are finding that it is no longer reliable, and in fact
  fails rather often.

  It is most noticeable with riscv64 builds, which is the architecture
  where we most frequently ran into problems before with kpartx.  The
  first riscv64+generic build in noble where the expected loop partition
  device is not available is

https://launchpad.net/~ubuntu-
  cdimage/+livefs/ubuntu/noble/cpc/+build/531790

  The failure is however not unique to riscv64, and the autopkgtest for
  the latest version of livecd-rootfs (24.04.7) - an update that
  specifically tries to add more debugging code for this scenario - has
  also failed on ppc64el.

https://autopkgtest.ubuntu.com/packages/l/livecd-
  rootfs/noble/ppc64el

  The first failure happened on November 16.  While there has been an
  update to the util-linux package in noble, this did not land until
  November 23.

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/2045586/+subscriptions


-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
Post to : touch-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


[Touch-packages] [Bug 2045586] Re: livecd-rootfs uses losetup -P for theoretically reliable/synchronous partition setup but it's not reliable in noble

2023-12-09 Thread Andy Whitcroft
Was there any systemd/udev change in this timeframe?  As the device
files are very much connected to those.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to util-linux in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2045586

Title:
  livecd-rootfs uses losetup -P for theoretically reliable/synchronous
  partition setup but it's not reliable in noble

Status in linux package in Ubuntu:
  New
Status in livecd-rootfs package in Ubuntu:
  New
Status in util-linux package in Ubuntu:
  New

Bug description:
  In mantic, we migrated livecd-rootfs to use losetup -P instead of
  kpartx, with the expectation that this would give us a reliable, race-
  free way of loop-mounting partitions from a disk image during image
  build.

  In noble, we are finding that it is no longer reliable, and in fact
  fails rather often.

  It is most noticeable with riscv64 builds, which is the architecture
  where we most frequently ran into problems before with kpartx.  The
  first riscv64+generic build in noble where the expected loop partition
  device is not available is

https://launchpad.net/~ubuntu-
  cdimage/+livefs/ubuntu/noble/cpc/+build/531790

  The failure is however not unique to riscv64, and the autopkgtest for
  the latest version of livecd-rootfs (24.04.7) - an update that
  specifically tries to add more debugging code for this scenario - has
  also failed on ppc64el.

https://autopkgtest.ubuntu.com/packages/l/livecd-
  rootfs/noble/ppc64el

  The first failure happened on November 16.  While there has been an
  update to the util-linux package in noble, this did not land until
  November 23.

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/2045586/+subscriptions


-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
Post to : touch-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


[Touch-packages] [Bug 2045576] Re: Please merge 0.52.24-1 into noble

2023-12-09 Thread Launchpad Bug Tracker
This bug was fixed in the package newt - 0.52.24-1ubuntu1

---
newt (0.52.24-1ubuntu1) noble; urgency=medium

  * Merge with Debian unstable (LP: #2045576). Remaining changes:
+ Remove libnewt0.52.preinst altogether, which contains destructive
  operations with none of the appropriate version guards
+ Add correct build-dependencies on python3-all-dbg and
  libpython3-all-dbg, needed due to debian/patches/snack.patch
+ Don't install python-newt example files
+ Install/remove alternatives for the ubuntu palette
+ Revert Debian's dropping of /etc/newt/palette.original, used as an
  alternative in Ubuntu
  * Removed irrelevant changelog entry discovered when merging with git-ubuntu

newt (0.52.24-1) unstable; urgency=medium

  * New upstream release
  * Standards-Version: 4.6.2

 -- Mateus Rodrigues de Morais   Tue, 05
Dec 2023 14:21:31 -0300

** Changed in: newt (Ubuntu)
   Status: Fix Committed => Fix Released

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to newt in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2045576

Title:
  Please merge 0.52.24-1 into noble

Status in newt package in Ubuntu:
  Fix Released

Bug description:
  The upstream version 0.52.24-1 should be merged into noble. The
  current version is 0.52.23-1ubuntu2.

  * PPA for review: https://launchpad.net/~mateus-
  morais/+archive/ubuntu/newt-merge

  Note: this is a tracking bug

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/newt/+bug/2045576/+subscriptions


-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
Post to : touch-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


[Touch-packages] [Bug 2043640] Re: amdgpu: GPU Recovery fails, frequent hangs

2023-12-09 Thread Mario Limonciello
This is the same issue as
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/2045573

Here is a commit that fixes the issue by changing default pre-emption
policy since the kernel can't know about your mesa version.

https://github.com/torvalds/linux/commit/d6a57588666301acd9d42d3b00d74240964f07f6


** Changed in: linux (Ubuntu)
   Status: Won't Fix => Confirmed

** Changed in: linux (Ubuntu Jammy)
   Status: Won't Fix => Confirmed

** Changed in: linux (Ubuntu Lunar)
   Status: Won't Fix => Confirmed

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to mesa in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2043640

Title:
  amdgpu: GPU Recovery fails, frequent hangs

Status in Mesa:
  Fix Released
Status in linux package in Ubuntu:
  Confirmed
Status in mesa package in Ubuntu:
  Fix Released
Status in linux source package in Jammy:
  Confirmed
Status in mesa source package in Jammy:
  New
Status in linux source package in Lunar:
  Confirmed
Status in mesa source package in Lunar:
  New

Bug description:
  I've been using 23.04 for a few months, and experienced a total system
  hang occasionally when sharing my screen over Zoom or Google Meet
  (running on Google Chrome).

  At first it hangs and then it periodically flashes like it's trying
  (unsuccessfully) to recover; I've got 3 screens (including the
  laptop's internal one) and each attempt shows something different (at
  first it tries to recover the contents of all 3 screens, then it shows
  only one of them, and then it shows the same content on all 3, but it
  never gets responsive).

  I've recently upgraded to 23.10, hoping a new kernel would help the
  situation. It's only gotten considerably worse now; it hangs sometimes
  just when opening Zoom; it's somehow easier to reproduce with Google
  Chrome. Interestingly, it fails quickly and reliably now when enabling
  my webcam (with special effects). It started hanging badly when using
  Google Maps as well.

  For all these behaviors, I suspect amdgpu is to blame (I'm running on
  Renoir, 4750U Pro); `dmesg` and `journalctl` didn't seem to show
  anything interesting.

  Any tips about debugging this further?

  ProblemType: Bug
  DistroRelease: Ubuntu 23.10
  Package: linux-generic 6.5.0.10.12
  ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 6.5.0-10.10-generic 6.5.3
  Uname: Linux 6.5.0-10-generic x86_64
  ApportVersion: 2.27.0-0ubuntu5
  Architecture: amd64
  CRDA: N/A
  CasperMD5CheckResult: pass
  CurrentDesktop: GNOME
  Date: Thu Nov 16 02:27:45 2023
  InstallationDate: Installed on 2023-07-02 (137 days ago)
  InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 23.04 "Lunar Lobster" - Release amd64 (20230418)
  MachineType: {report['dmi.sys.vendor']} {report['dmi.product.name']}
  ProcEnviron:
   LANG=en_US.UTF-8
   PATH=(custom, no user)
   SHELL=/bin/bash
   TERM=xterm-256color
   XDG_RUNTIME_DIR=
  ProcFB: 0 amdgpudrmfb
  ProcKernelCmdLine: BOOT_IMAGE=/vmlinuz-6.5.0-10-generic 
root=/dev/mapper/ubuntu--vg-ubuntu--lv ro quiet splash vt.handoff=7
  PulseList: Error: command ['pacmd', 'list'] failed with exit code 1: No 
PulseAudio daemon running, or not running as session daemon.
  RelatedPackageVersions:
   linux-restricted-modules-6.5.0-10-generic N/A
   linux-backports-modules-6.5.0-10-generic  N/A
   linux-firmware20230919.git3672ccab-0ubuntu2.1
  SourcePackage: linux
  UpgradeStatus: Upgraded to mantic on 2023-11-14 (2 days ago)
  dmi.bios.date: 06/13/2023
  dmi.bios.release: 1.44
  dmi.bios.vendor: LENOVO
  dmi.bios.version: R1BET75W(1.44 )
  dmi.board.asset.tag: Not Available
  dmi.board.name: 20UD000GUS
  dmi.board.vendor: LENOVO
  dmi.board.version: SDK0J40697 WIN
  dmi.chassis.asset.tag: No Asset Information
  dmi.chassis.type: 10
  dmi.chassis.vendor: LENOVO
  dmi.chassis.version: None
  dmi.ec.firmware.release: 1.44
  dmi.modalias: 
dmi:bvnLENOVO:bvrR1BET75W(1.44):bd06/13/2023:br1.44:efr1.44:svnLENOVO:pn20UD000GUS:pvrThinkPadT14Gen1:rvnLENOVO:rn20UD000GUS:rvrSDK0J40697WIN:cvnLENOVO:ct10:cvrNone:skuLENOVO_MT_20UD_BU_Think_FM_ThinkPadT14Gen1:
  dmi.product.family: ThinkPad T14 Gen 1
  dmi.product.name: 20UD000GUS
  dmi.product.sku: LENOVO_MT_20UD_BU_Think_FM_ThinkPad T14 Gen 1
  dmi.product.version: ThinkPad T14 Gen 1
  dmi.sys.vendor: LENOVO

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/mesa/+bug/2043640/+subscriptions


-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
Post to : touch-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


[Touch-packages] [Bug 2037604] Autopkgtest regression report (mesa/23.2.1-1ubuntu3.1~22.04.1)

2023-12-09 Thread Ubuntu SRU Bot
All autopkgtests for the newly accepted mesa (23.2.1-1ubuntu3.1~22.04.1) for 
jammy have finished running.
The following regressions have been reported in tests triggered by the package:

mutter/42.9-0ubuntu5 (arm64, ppc64el)
vtk9/9.1.0+really9.1.0+dfsg2-3build1 (armhf)


Please visit the excuses page listed below and investigate the failures, 
proceeding afterwards as per the StableReleaseUpdates policy regarding 
autopkgtest regressions [1].

https://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-archive/proposed-
migration/jammy/update_excuses.html#mesa

[1] https://wiki.ubuntu.com/StableReleaseUpdates#Autopkgtest_Regressions

Thank you!

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to mesa in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2037604

Title:
  Backport packages for 22.04.4 HWE stack

Status in directx-headers package in Ubuntu:
  Invalid
Status in mesa package in Ubuntu:
  Invalid
Status in rust-bindgen package in Ubuntu:
  Invalid
Status in rust-clang-sys package in Ubuntu:
  Invalid
Status in directx-headers source package in Jammy:
  Fix Committed
Status in mesa source package in Jammy:
  Fix Committed
Status in rust-bindgen source package in Jammy:
  Invalid
Status in rust-clang-sys source package in Jammy:
  Invalid

Bug description:
  [Impact]
  The graphics HWE stack from mantic needs to be backported for 22.04.4

  directx-headers
  - build-dep of the new Mesa

  mesa
  - new major release (23.2.x)
  - new HW support, Meteor Lake..

  [Test case]
  We want to cover at least 2-3 different, widely used and already previously 
supported GPU generations from both AMD and Intel which are supported by this 
release, as those are the ones that cover most bases; nouveau users tend to 
switch to the NVIDIA blob after installation. No need to test ancient GPU's 
supported by mesa-amber. And best to focus on the newer generations (~5y and 
newer) as the older ones are less likely to break at this point.
  - AMD: Vega, Navi1x (RX5000*), Navi2x (RX6000*), Navi3x (RX7000*)
  - Intel: gen9 (SKL/APL/KBL/CFL/WHL/CML), gen11 (ICL), gen12 (TGL/RKL/RPL/DG2)

  Install the new packages and run some tests:
  - check that the desktop is still using hw acceleration and hasn't fallen 
back to swrast/llvmpipe
  - run freely available benchmarks that torture the GPU (Unigine 
Heaven/Valley/Superposition)
  - run some games from Steam if possible

  and in each case check that there is no gfx corruption happening or
  worse.

  Note that upstream releases have already been tested for OpenGL and
  Vulkan conformance by their CI.

  [Where things could go wrong]
  This is a major update of Mesa, there could be regressions but we'll try to 
catch any with testing. And since it shares bugs with mantic, we'd already know 
if there are serious issues. We will backport the final 23.2.x at a later 
stage, the first backport is needed for enabling Intel Meteor Lake.

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/directx-headers/+bug/2037604/+subscriptions


-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
Post to : touch-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp