[Touch-packages] [Bug 1989309] Re: [FFe] apparmor 3.1.1 upstream release

2022-09-21 Thread Alex Murray
** Attachment added: "apparmor-3.0.7-to-3.1.1-git-log.log" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/apparmor/+bug/1989309/+attachment/5617640/+files/apparmor-3.0.7-to-3.1.1-git-log.log ** Description changed: AppArmor 3.1.1 is the latest upstream version of the apparmor userspace

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1989309] Re: [FFe] apparmor 3.1.1 upstream release

2022-09-21 Thread Alex Murray
** Description changed: - Placeholder for preparation of AppArmor 3.1.1 for kinetic. + AppArmor 3.1.1 is the latest upstream version of the apparmor userspace + tooling. + + This includes a large number of bug fixes since the 3.0.7 release which + is currently in kinetic, as well as various

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1990064] Re: unconfined profile denies userns_create for chromium based processes

2022-09-18 Thread Alex Murray
This sounds like a kernel regression. The commit you link to is for SELinux, which is not enabled by default in Ubuntu, so I doubt it is that specifically - instead I suspect this is due to the following commit: https://git.launchpad.net/~ubuntu-

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1989309] [NEW] [FFe] apparmor 3.1.1 upstream release

2022-09-11 Thread Alex Murray
Public bug reported: Placeholder for preparation of AppArmor 3.1.1 for kinetic. ** Affects: apparmor (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Summary changed: - [FFe] apparmor 3.1.0 upstream release + [FFe] apparmor 3.1.1 upstream release -- You received this bug

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1992580] Re: i915 DG1 fails to load

2022-10-12 Thread Alex Murray
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 1991704 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1991704 ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 1991704 Kinetic kernels 5.19.0-18/19-generic won't boot on Intel 11th/12th gen -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1992430] Re: Snap based apps crash after 5.19.0-18->5.19.0-19 kernel upgrade

2022-10-11 Thread Alex Murray
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 1991691 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1991691 ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 1991691 cannot change mount namespace -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1899218] Re: Incorrect warning from apparmor_parser on force complained profiles

2023-03-28 Thread Alex Murray
This bug is fixed and the behaviour you are seeing is expected - ie. it is expected that AppArmor prints a warning about forcing complain mode for the usr.sbin.sssd profile and that it then also prints a warning about caching being disabled for that due to it being in force complain mode. This is

[Touch-packages] [Bug 2026227] [NEW] Backport 4.0 ABI for AppArmor 3 in mantic

2023-07-05 Thread Alex Murray
lt;(aa-features-abi -x) f17b0a97806d733b5b884d8a1c2fea37 /etc/apparmor.d/abi/4.0 f17b0a97806d733b5b884d8a1c2fea37 /dev/fd/63 ** Affects: apparmor (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Assignee: Alex Murray (alexmurray) Status: New ** Affects: apparmor (Ubuntu Mantic) Impo

[Touch-packages] [Bug 2024637] [NEW] apparmor.service tries to load snapd generated apparmor profiles but fails

2023-06-22 Thread Alex Murray
Public bug reported: As of snapd 2.60, when installed as a snap, snapd includes its own vendored apparmor_parser and configuration. As such, it generates profiles using newer apparmor features than the system installed apparmor may support. This is seen as a failure to load the apparmor.service

[Touch-packages] [Bug 2024637] Re: apparmor.service tries to load snapd generated apparmor profiles but fails

2023-06-22 Thread Alex Murray
** Also affects: apparmor (Ubuntu Xenial) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Also affects: apparmor (Ubuntu Bionic) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to

[Touch-packages] [Bug 2024637] Re: apparmor.service tries to load snapd generated apparmor profiles but fails

2023-06-22 Thread Alex Murray
A possible fix on the snapd side is being prepared in tandem in https://github.com/snapcore/snapd/pull/12909 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to apparmor in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2024637 Title:

[Touch-packages] [Bug 2024637] Re: apparmor.service tries to load snapd generated apparmor profiles but fails

2023-06-22 Thread Alex Murray
** Also affects: snapd (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to apparmor in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2024637 Title: apparmor.service tries to load

[Touch-packages] [Bug 2024637] Re: apparmor.service tries to load snapd generated apparmor profiles but fails

2023-06-29 Thread Alex Murray
Importance: Undecided => High ** Changed in: apparmor (Ubuntu Xenial) Assignee: (unassigned) => Alex Murray (alexmurray) ** Changed in: apparmor (Ubuntu Bionic) Assignee: (unassigned) => Alex Murray (alexmurray) ** Changed in: apparmor (Ubuntu Xenial) Status: New =>

[Touch-packages] [Bug 2024637] Re: apparmor.service tries to load snapd generated apparmor profiles but fails

2023-06-29 Thread Alex Murray
** Patch added: "debdiff for bionic" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/apparmor/+bug/2024637/+attachment/5682828/+files/apparmor_2.12-4ubuntu5.2.debdiff -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to apparmor in

[Touch-packages] [Bug 2024637] Re: apparmor.service tries to load snapd generated apparmor profiles but fails

2023-06-29 Thread Alex Murray
** Patch added: "bionic debdiff with corrected version number" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/apparmor/+bug/2024637/+attachment/5682930/+files/apparmor_2.12-4ubuntu5.3.debdiff ** Patch removed: "debdiff for bionic"

[Touch-packages] [Bug 2024637] Re: apparmor.service tries to load snapd generated apparmor profiles but fails

2023-06-29 Thread Alex Murray
It turns out there was already an upload of apparmor 2.12-4ubuntu5.2 to bionic-proposed that got rejected (https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/apparmor/+bug/1703821/comments/15), so this update will instead need to skip this version number and use 2.12-4ubuntu5.3 instead. -- You received

[Touch-packages] [Bug 2051540] Re: ufw ftbfs with Python 3.12 as default

2024-02-07 Thread Alex Murray
Both deb8 tests already declares a Depends on python3-distutils - and we can see that the current test runs all used the 3.11 based python3-distutils - do we need a no-change-rebuild of python3-stdlib- extensions so that it builds against python 3.12? -- You received this bug notification

[Touch-packages] [Bug 2029464] Re: A stack overflow in GNU Tar

2023-12-05 Thread Alex Murray
So I managed to create a tar file with an extended attribute name of length of ~ 36 bytes long (the largest I can do without exceeding the existing check on maximum extended header lengths it seems) but this is not able to trigger the vuln - so if you are able to share your PoC that would be

[Touch-packages] [Bug 2029464] Re: A stack overflow in GNU Tar

2023-12-05 Thread Alex Murray
Actually I just got it working - no need to send PoC @kerneldude - I made my own. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to tar in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2029464 Title: A stack overflow in GNU Tar

[Touch-packages] [Bug 2044625] Re: package libgdk-pixbuf-2.0-0:amd64 2.42.10+dfsg-1build1 failed to install/upgrade: зацикливание триггеров, отмена работы

2023-11-29 Thread Alex Murray
Thanks for taking the time to report this bug and helping to make Ubuntu better. We appreciate the difficulties you are facing, but this appears to be a "regular" (non-security) bug. I have unmarked it as a security issue since this bug does not show evidence of allowing attackers to cross

[Touch-packages] [Bug 2029464] Re: A stack overflow in GNU Tar

2023-11-29 Thread Alex Murray
@kerneldude - do you know if MITRE ever assigned a CVE for this? ** Information type changed from Private Security to Public Security -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to tar in Ubuntu.

[Touch-packages] [Bug 2029464] Re: A stack overflow in GNU Tar

2023-12-04 Thread Alex Murray
@kerneldude - any chance you could share your poc (perhaps email it to secur...@ubuntu.com rather than post it publicly here)? I have tried creating one via the following but I hit the CLI args limit before I can get an xattr key long enough: touch bar tar --pax-option SCHILY.xattr.user.$(python3

[Touch-packages] [Bug 2029464] Re: A stack overflow in GNU Tar

2023-11-30 Thread Alex Murray
Excellent - thanks for letting us know. So since a CVE has already been assigned then we won't assign an additional one. I'll add the details to our CVE tracker. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to tar in Ubuntu.

[Touch-packages] [Bug 2051540] Re: ufw ftbfs with Python 3.12 as default

2024-01-30 Thread Alex Murray
** Also affects: ufw Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to ufw in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2051540 Title: ufw ftbfs with Python 3.12 as default Status

[Touch-packages] [Bug 2043711] Re: Open3.pm tries to run code in /tmp when updating ubuntu-drivers-common

2023-11-19 Thread Alex Murray
I am struggling to see the vulnerability here still - the path used in this case is /tmp/ubuntu-drivers-common.config.55GJ8b appears to have a randomly generated suffix and so couldn't have been guessed beforehand nor preseeded with other contents by a local attacker - so the only way then that I

[Touch-packages] [Bug 2062440] Re: A few days ago I realized that the time was four hours behind despite it being automatic with the correct time zone.

2024-04-19 Thread Alex Murray
Thanks for taking the time to report this bug and helping to make Ubuntu better. We appreciate the difficulties you are facing, but this appears to be a "regular" (non-security) bug. I have unmarked it as a security issue since this bug does not show evidence of allowing attackers to cross

[Touch-packages] [Bug 2061856] Re: gnome terminal

2024-04-19 Thread Alex Murray
Thanks for taking the time to report this bug and helping to make Ubuntu better. We appreciate the difficulties you are facing, but this appears to be a "regular" (non-security) bug. I have unmarked it as a security issue since this bug does not show evidence of allowing attackers to cross

[Touch-packages] [Bug 2061856]

2024-04-19 Thread Alex Murray
Thanks for taking the time to report this bug and helping to make Ubuntu better. Your bug report is more likely to get attention if it is made in English, since this is the language understood by the majority of Ubuntu developers. Additionally, please only mark a bug as "security" if it shows

[Touch-packages] [Bug 2061191]

2024-04-19 Thread Alex Murray
Thanks for taking the time to report this bug and helping to make Ubuntu better. Since the package referred to in this bug is in universe or multiverse, it is community maintained. If you are able, I suggest coordinating with upstream and posting a debdiff for this issue. When a debdiff is

[Touch-packages] [Bug 2063271] Re: Illegal opcode in libssl

2024-04-23 Thread Alex Murray
Thanks for reporting this issue - but it is strange since this update has been published since 2024-02-27 and this is the first such report of any issues. Also given this update has been available for nearly 2 months it is surprising you are seeing errors from it so much later - I wonder if

[Touch-packages] [Bug 2054924] Re: color emoji are broken with fontconfig 2.15

2024-03-06 Thread Alex Murray
As per https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/fontconfig/fontconfig/-/issues/409#note_2298588 this can also be fixed by adding an additional rule to /etc/fonts/conf.d/70-no-bitmaps.conf of the form: false ** Bug watch added: gitlab.freedesktop.org/fontconfig/fontconfig/-/issues #409

[Touch-packages] [Bug 2058329] [NEW] Update apparmor to 4.0.0-beta3 in noble

2024-03-19 Thread Alex Murray
Public bug reported: Latest upstream release https://gitlab.com/apparmor/apparmor/-/releases/v4.0.0-beta3 Contains only bug fixes since 4.0.0-beta2 which is currently in noble- proposed thus does not require a FFe. ** Affects: apparmor (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New

[Touch-packages] [Bug 2056496] Re: [FFe] AppArmor 4.0-beta2 + prompting support for noble

2024-03-12 Thread Alex Murray
Uploaded to noble-proposed yesterday https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/apparmor/4.0.0~beta2-0ubuntu3 ** Changed in: apparmor (Ubuntu) Status: Triaged => Fix Committed -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to

[Touch-packages] [Bug 2056696] Re: All Snaps are denied the ability to use DBus for notifications and apptray indicators in KDE-based flavors

2024-03-14 Thread Alex Murray
> Log: apparmor="DENIED" operation="dbus_method_call" bus="session" path="/org/freedesktop/DBus" interface="org.freedesktop.DBus" member="ListActivatableNames" mask="send" name="org.freedesktop.DBus" pid=2950 label="snap.element-desktop.element-desktop" peer_label="unconfined" This is provided by

[Touch-packages] [Bug 2056696] Re: All Snaps are denied the ability to use DBus for notifications and apptray indicators in KDE-based flavors

2024-03-20 Thread Alex Murray
The subsequent error is: Main script file /usr/lib/x86_64-linux- gnu/calamares/modules/automirror/main.py for python job automirror raised an exception. Is there any way I can debug this further? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages,

[Touch-packages] [Bug 2056696] Re: All Snaps are denied the ability to use DBus for notifications and apptray indicators in KDE-based flavors

2024-03-20 Thread Alex Murray
Ah although it seems I can reboot the VM at this point and whilst Calamares appeared to run again again in the rebooted vm if I choose Install Calamares closes and I see the installed kubuntu environment - weird Anyway I think I will be able to use this to debug the original issue further -

[Touch-packages] [Bug 2056696] Re: All Snaps are denied the ability to use DBus for notifications and apptray indicators in KDE-based flavors

2024-03-20 Thread Alex Murray
Yes I hit that exact issue in Calamares but after fixing it I then hit another similar crash in a different script in calamares - will see if I can reproduce and provide you with details. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is

[Touch-packages] [Bug 2056696] Re: All Snaps are denied the ability to use DBus for notifications and apptray indicators in KDE-based flavors

2024-03-20 Thread Alex Murray
Ok whilst I still can't see the /StatusNotifierItem object listed via d-feet I can reproduce the denials when launching element-desktop so I have added some additional changes to the aforementioned PR which resolve these as well. With all the changes from that PR in place all of these mentioned

[Touch-packages] [Bug 2056696] Re: All Snaps are denied the ability to use DBus for notifications and apptray indicators in KDE-based flavors

2024-03-19 Thread Alex Murray
So I installed kubuntu-desktop on an up-to-date noble VM and then after logging into the kubuntu session I was able to reproduce the issue for Notifications but I couldn't see anything owning the /StatusNotifierItem dbus path. For notifications I submitted

[Touch-packages] [Bug 2059417] Re: Sync xz-utils 5.6.1-1 (main) from Debian unstable (main)

2024-03-29 Thread Alex Murray
Given this has been reverted in Debian, it should not be synced into Ubuntu. ** Changed in: xz-utils (Ubuntu) Status: New => Won't Fix -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to xz-utils in Ubuntu.

<    1   2   3   4