[Touch-packages] [Bug 1981672] Re: phased updates API and client for aptitude
so if anyone else wants to opt out from it, you're welcome: https://github.com/alexmyczko/autoexec.bat/blob/master/config.sys/ubuntu- remove-phased-updates -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to apt in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1981672 Title: phased updates API and client for aptitude Status in apt package in Ubuntu: Triaged Status in aptitude package in Ubuntu: Triaged Bug description: Having the configuration at https://discourse.ubuntu.com/t/phased-updates-in-apt-in-21-04/20345/24 it fails to work. The phased updates get distributed on some hosts anyways for 22.04. Please properly document and test this, and provide a working configuration to opt out from phased updates. To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/apt/+bug/1981672/+subscriptions -- Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages Post to : touch-packages@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
[Touch-packages] [Bug 1981672] Re: phased updates API and client for aptitude
hobbit-plugins
client/apt check reports:
Fri Sep 23 08:59:06 2022 - apt NOT ok
Ubuntu 22.04.1 LTS
yellow Packages not installed from apt repositories (4):
libnss-systemd:amd64 (249.11-0ubuntu3.4)
libudev1:amd64 (249.11-0ubuntu3.4)
systemd-sysv (249.11-0ubuntu3.4)
systemd-timesyncd (249.11-0ubuntu3.4)
green Last apt update: 0.1 day(s) ago
without checking if packages were installed while a phased update is going on:
https://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-archive/phased-updates.html
one workaround would be to patch the check with:
pkgreport('Packages not installed from apt repositories (maybe phased?)',
'green', @no_repo);
but that would blind us on seeing packages really not installed from
packages (and not phased updates)
** Also affects: hobbit-plugins (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to apt in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1981672
Title:
phased updates API and client for aptitude
Status in apt package in Ubuntu:
Invalid
Status in aptitude package in Ubuntu:
Invalid
Status in hobbit-plugins package in Ubuntu:
New
Bug description:
Having the configuration at
https://discourse.ubuntu.com/t/phased-updates-in-apt-in-21-04/20345/24
it fails to work.
The phased updates get distributed on some hosts anyways for 22.04.
Please properly document and test this, and provide a working
configuration to opt out from phased updates.
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/apt/+bug/1981672/+subscriptions
--
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
Post to : touch-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
[Touch-packages] [Bug 1981672] Re: phased updates API and client for aptitude
Hi Julian, Looks like APT::Get::Phase-Policy true; did what I wanted. Thank you. ** Changed in: apt (Ubuntu) Status: Triaged => Invalid ** Changed in: aptitude (Ubuntu) Status: Triaged => Invalid -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to apt in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1981672 Title: phased updates API and client for aptitude Status in apt package in Ubuntu: Invalid Status in aptitude package in Ubuntu: Invalid Bug description: Having the configuration at https://discourse.ubuntu.com/t/phased-updates-in-apt-in-21-04/20345/24 it fails to work. The phased updates get distributed on some hosts anyways for 22.04. Please properly document and test this, and provide a working configuration to opt out from phased updates. To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/apt/+bug/1981672/+subscriptions -- Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages Post to : touch-packages@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
[Touch-packages] [Bug 1981672] Re: apt phased out broken code, missing documentation to opt out
it appears phased upates are everywhere and not just with proposed repos... so although the bug might be against the wrong package filed (feel free to reassign to somewhere else). there's a bug lacking information how to properly opt out of phased updates. which is pointless to take part of if the automatic bug reporting is disabled/removed. ** Changed in: apt (Ubuntu) Status: Invalid => In Progress -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to apt in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1981672 Title: apt phased out broken code, missing documentation to opt out Status in apt package in Ubuntu: In Progress Bug description: Having the configuration at https://discourse.ubuntu.com/t/phased-updates-in-apt-in-21-04/20345/24 it fails to work. The phased updates get distributed on some hosts anyways for 22.04. Please properly document and test this, and provide a working configuration to opt out from phased updates. To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/apt/+bug/1981672/+subscriptions -- Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages Post to : touch-packages@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
[Touch-packages] [Bug 1981672] Re: apt phased out broken code, missing documentation to opt out
it appears the phased updates only get installed if sources.list also has proposed repos, without them, it's all fine. sorry for the noise ** Changed in: apt (Ubuntu) Status: Incomplete => Invalid -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to apt in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1981672 Title: apt phased out broken code, missing documentation to opt out Status in apt package in Ubuntu: Invalid Bug description: Having the configuration at https://discourse.ubuntu.com/t/phased-updates-in-apt-in-21-04/20345/24 it fails to work. The phased updates get distributed on some hosts anyways for 22.04. Please properly document and test this, and provide a working configuration to opt out from phased updates. To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/apt/+bug/1981672/+subscriptions -- Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages Post to : touch-packages@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
[Touch-packages] [Bug 1981672] Re: apt phased out broken code, missing documentation to opt out
I partly agree, the problem seems it is a phased update? Can you confirm or not? Because other 22.04 machines don't get that version (90% of the other 22.04 machines). Thus I wish to have a way to not take part of phased updates, especially since we disable auto bug reporting (which seems to be crucial part of phased updates roll out increment or roll back/discard) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to apt in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1981672 Title: apt phased out broken code, missing documentation to opt out Status in apt package in Ubuntu: Incomplete Bug description: Having the configuration at https://discourse.ubuntu.com/t/phased-updates-in-apt-in-21-04/20345/24 it fails to work. The phased updates get distributed on some hosts anyways for 22.04. Please properly document and test this, and provide a working configuration to opt out from phased updates. To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/apt/+bug/1981672/+subscriptions -- Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages Post to : touch-packages@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
[Touch-packages] [Bug 1981672] Re: apt phased out broken code, missing documentation to opt out
a downgrade is possible: hostname:~# apt policy libmysqlclient21 libmysqlclient21: Installed: 8.0.29-0ubuntu0.22.04.3 Candidate: 8.0.29-0ubuntu0.22.04.3 Version table: *** 8.0.29-0ubuntu0.22.04.3 500 (phased 10%) 500 http://ubuntu.ethz.ch/ubuntu jammy-updates/main amd64 Packages 500 http://ubuntu.ethz.ch/ubuntu jammy-proposed/main amd64 Packages 100 /var/lib/dpkg/status 8.0.29-0ubuntu0.22.04.2 500 500 http://ubuntu.ethz.ch/ubuntu jammy-security/main amd64 Packages 8.0.28-0ubuntu4 500 500 http://ubuntu.ethz.ch/ubuntu jammy/main amd64 Packages hostname:~# apt install libmysqlclient21=8.0.29-0ubuntu0.22.04.2 Reading package lists... Done Building dependency tree... Done Reading state information... Done The following packages were automatically installed and are no longer required: libaom-dev libarmadillo-dev libarpack2-dev libavformat-dev libblosc-dev libcharls-dev libdav1d-dev libde265-dev libdouble-conversion-dev libfreexl-dev libfyba-dev libgeos-dev libgeotiff-dev libgl2ps-dev libglew-dev libheif-dev libjson-c-dev libjsoncpp-dev libkml-dev libkmlconvenience1 libkmlregionator1 libkmlxsd1 liblapack-dev libnetcdf-c++4 libnetcdf-cxx-legacy-dev libogdi-dev libopenjp2-7-dev libopenni2-0 libopenni2-dev libpcl-apps1.12 libpcl-common1.12 libpcl-features1.12 libpcl-filters1.12 libpcl-io1.12 libpcl-kdtree1.12 libpcl-keypoints1.12 libpcl-ml1.12 libpcl-octree1.12 libpcl-outofcore1.12 libpcl-people1.12 libpcl-recognition1.12 libpcl-registration1.12 libpcl-sample-consensus1.12 libpcl-search1.12 libpcl-segmentation1.12 libpcl-stereo1.12 libpcl-surface1.12 libpcl-tracking1.12 libpcl-visualization1.12 libpoppler-dev libpoppler-private-dev libproj-dev librttopo-dev libspatialite-dev libsuperlu-dev libswscale-dev libtheora-dev liburiparser-dev libusb-1.0-0-dev libutfcpp-dev libvtk9-java libvtk9.1-qt libx265-dev libzstd-dev python3-vtk9 qttools5-private-dev tcl-dev tcl8.6-dev tk-dev tk8.6-dev vtk9 Use 'apt autoremove' to remove them. The following packages will be REMOVED: default-libmysqlclient-dev libgdal-dev libmysqlclient-dev libpcl-dev libvtk9-dev libvtk9-qt-dev The following packages will be DOWNGRADED: libmysqlclient21 0 upgraded, 0 newly installed, 1 downgraded, 6 to remove and 0 not upgraded. Need to get 1,273 kB of archives. After this operation, 102 MB disk space will be freed. Do you want to continue? [Y/n] hostname:~# apt install libmysqlclient21 Reading package lists... Done Building dependency tree... Done Reading state information... Done The following packages were automatically installed and are no longer required: libaom-dev libarmadillo-dev libarpack2-dev libavformat-dev libblosc-dev libcharls-dev libdav1d-dev libde265-dev libdouble-conversion-dev libfreexl-dev libfyba-dev libgeos-dev libgeotiff-dev libgl2ps-dev libglew-dev libheif-dev libjson-c-dev libjsoncpp-dev libkml-dev libkmlconvenience1 libkmlregionator1 libkmlxsd1 liblapack-dev libnetcdf-c++4 libnetcdf-cxx-legacy-dev libogdi-dev libopenjp2-7-dev libopenni2-0 libopenni2-dev libpcl-apps1.12 libpcl-common1.12 libpcl-features1.12 libpcl-filters1.12 libpcl-io1.12 libpcl-kdtree1.12 libpcl-keypoints1.12 libpcl-ml1.12 libpcl-octree1.12 libpcl-outofcore1.12 libpcl-people1.12 libpcl-recognition1.12 libpcl-registration1.12 libpcl-sample-consensus1.12 libpcl-search1.12 libpcl-segmentation1.12 libpcl-stereo1.12 libpcl-surface1.12 libpcl-tracking1.12 libpcl-visualization1.12 libpoppler-dev libpoppler-private-dev libproj-dev librttopo-dev libspatialite-dev libsuperlu-dev libswscale-dev libtheora-dev liburiparser-dev libusb-1.0-0-dev libutfcpp-dev libvtk9-java libvtk9.1-qt libx265-dev libzstd-dev python3-vtk9 qttools5-private-dev tcl-dev tcl8.6-dev tk-dev tk8.6-dev vtk9 Use 'apt autoremove' to remove them. The following packages will be upgraded: libmysqlclient21 1 upgraded, 0 newly installed, 0 to remove and 0 not upgraded. Need to get 1,273 kB of archives. After this operation, 0 B of additional disk space will be used. Get:1 http://ubuntu.ethz.ch/ubuntu jammy-updates/main amd64 libmysqlclient21 amd64 8.0.29-0ubuntu0.22.04.3 [1,273 kB] Fetched 1,273 kB in 0s (16.9 MB/s) (Reading database ... 750292 files and directories currently installed.) Preparing to unpack .../libmysqlclient21_8.0.29-0ubuntu0.22.04.3_amd64.deb ... Unpacking libmysqlclient21:amd64 (8.0.29-0ubuntu0.22.04.3) over (8.0.29-0ubuntu0.22.04.2) ... Setting up libmysqlclient21:amd64 (8.0.29-0ubuntu0.22.04.3) ... Processing triggers for libc-bin (2.35-0ubuntu3.1) ... /sbin/ldconfig.real: /lib/libXp.so.6 is not a symbolic link /sbin/ldconfig.real: /lib/libgfortran.so.3 is not a symbolic link Scanning processes... Scanning candidates... Scanning processor microcode...
[Touch-packages] [Bug 1981672] Re: apt phased out broken code, missing documentation to opt out
I wasn't expecting different behaviour of apt, apt-get, aptitude, and here's proof they're all linked against same libapt, same version: hostname:~# ldd $(which apt-get) |grep apt libapt-private.so.0.0 => /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libapt-private.so.0.0 (0x7fe7c1c68000) libapt-pkg.so.6.0 => /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libapt-pkg.so.6.0 (0x7fe7c1aa6000) hostname:~# ldd $(which apt) |grep apt libapt-private.so.0.0 => /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libapt-private.so.0.0 (0x7fd3023a5000) libapt-pkg.so.6.0 => /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libapt-pkg.so.6.0 (0x7fd3021e3000) hostname:~# ldd $(which aptitude) |grep apt libapt-pkg.so.6.0 => /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libapt-pkg.so.6.0 (0x7fa63a117000) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to apt in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1981672 Title: apt phased out broken code, missing documentation to opt out Status in apt package in Ubuntu: Incomplete Bug description: Having the configuration at https://discourse.ubuntu.com/t/phased-updates-in-apt-in-21-04/20345/24 it fails to work. The phased updates get distributed on some hosts anyways for 22.04. Please properly document and test this, and provide a working configuration to opt out from phased updates. To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/apt/+bug/1981672/+subscriptions -- Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages Post to : touch-packages@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
[Touch-packages] [Bug 1981672] Re: apt phased out broken code, missing documentation to opt out
also we noticed that while the status page lags: https://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-archive/phased-updates.html we already get phased updates that are not listed: Packages not installed from apt repositories (1): libmysqlclient21:amd64 (8.0.29-0ubuntu0.22.04.3) reported by xymon monitoring system, hobbit plugins, apt plugin specifically. apt policy confirms it is part of phased updates. this problem exists with apt 2.4.6 as well as 2.5.1 on Ubuntu 22.04 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to apt in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1981672 Title: apt phased out broken code, missing documentation to opt out Status in apt package in Ubuntu: Incomplete Bug description: Having the configuration at https://discourse.ubuntu.com/t/phased-updates-in-apt-in-21-04/20345/24 it fails to work. The phased updates get distributed on some hosts anyways for 22.04. Please properly document and test this, and provide a working configuration to opt out from phased updates. To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/apt/+bug/1981672/+subscriptions -- Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages Post to : touch-packages@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
[Touch-packages] [Bug 1981672] Re: apt phased out broken code, missing documentation to opt out
1) We have like 100+ Ubuntu 22.04 machines, the updates get installed with aptitude (via aptitude-robot). No pinning, but one held package (nvtop) (on 66% of machines). 2) Here's just one package example: $ apt policy samba-libs samba-libs: Installed: 2:4.15.5~dfsg-0ubuntu5.1 Candidate: 2:4.15.5~dfsg-0ubuntu5.1 Version table: *** 2:4.15.5~dfsg-0ubuntu5.1 500 (phased 40%) 500 http://ubuntu.ethz.ch/ubuntu jammy-updates/main amd64 Packages 500 http://ubuntu.ethz.ch/ubuntu jammy-proposed/main amd64 Packages 100 /var/lib/dpkg/status 2:4.15.5~dfsg-0ubuntu5 500 500 http://ubuntu.ethz.ch/ubuntu jammy/main amd64 Packages 3) $ cat sources.list deb http://ubuntu.ethz.ch/ubuntu jammy main restricted universe multiverse deb-src http://ubuntu.ethz.ch/ubuntu jammy main restricted universe multiverse deb http://ubuntu.ethz.ch/ubuntu jammy-security main restricted universe multiverse deb-src http://ubuntu.ethz.ch/ubuntu jammy-security main restricted universe multiverse deb http://ubuntu.ethz.ch/ubuntu jammy-updates main restricted universe multiverse deb-src http://ubuntu.ethz.ch/ubuntu jammy-updates main restricted universe multiverse deb http://ubuntu.ethz.ch/ubuntu jammy-proposed main restricted universe multiverse deb-src http://ubuntu.ethz.ch/ubuntu jammy-proposed main restricted universe multiverse sources.list.d 404 (all empty) 4) nothing there... It's so little, I just copy pasted it here. Hope that's fine. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to apt in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1981672 Title: apt phased out broken code, missing documentation to opt out Status in apt package in Ubuntu: Incomplete Bug description: Having the configuration at https://discourse.ubuntu.com/t/phased-updates-in-apt-in-21-04/20345/24 it fails to work. The phased updates get distributed on some hosts anyways for 22.04. Please properly document and test this, and provide a working configuration to opt out from phased updates. To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/apt/+bug/1981672/+subscriptions -- Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages Post to : touch-packages@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
[Touch-packages] [Bug 1981672] Re: apt phased out broken code, missing documentation to opt out
I get these updates, which I'd prefer not to be part of phased updates: libapt-pkg6.0:amd64 (2.5.1) libqt5core5a:amd64 (5.15.3+dfsg-2ubuntu0.1) libqt5dbus5:amd64 (5.15.3+dfsg-2ubuntu0.1) libqt5opengl5-dev:amd64 (5.15.3+dfsg-2ubuntu0.1) libqt5opengl5:amd64 (5.15.3+dfsg-2ubuntu0.1) libqt5sql5:amd64 (5.15.3+dfsg-2ubuntu0.1) libsmbclient:amd64 (2:4.15.5~dfsg-0ubuntu5.1) libsss-certmap0 (2.6.3-1ubuntu3.1) libsss-idmap0 (2.6.3-1ubuntu3.1) libsss-nss-idmap0 (2.6.3-1ubuntu3.1) qemu-user-static (1:6.2+dfsg-2ubuntu6.3) qemu-utils (1:6.2+dfsg-2ubuntu6.3) qt5-qmake:amd64 (5.15.3+dfsg-2ubuntu0.1) qtbase5-dev:amd64 (5.15.3+dfsg-2ubuntu0.1) samba-common-bin (2:4.15.5~dfsg-0ubuntu5.1) samba-libs:amd64 (2:4.15.5~dfsg-0ubuntu5.1) sssd-ad (2.6.3-1ubuntu3.1) sssd-ad-common (2.6.3-1ubuntu3.1) sssd-common (2.6.3-1ubuntu3.1) sssd-dbus (2.6.3-1ubuntu3.1) sssd-ipa (2.6.3-1ubuntu3.1) sssd-krb5 (2.6.3-1ubuntu3.1) sssd-krb5-common (2.6.3-1ubuntu3.1) sssd-ldap (2.6.3-1ubuntu3.1) sssd-proxy (2.6.3-1ubuntu3.1) sssd-tools (2.6.3-1ubuntu3.1) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to apt in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1981672 Title: apt phased out broken code, missing documentation to opt out Status in apt package in Ubuntu: Incomplete Bug description: Having the configuration at https://discourse.ubuntu.com/t/phased-updates-in-apt-in-21-04/20345/24 it fails to work. The phased updates get distributed on some hosts anyways for 22.04. Please properly document and test this, and provide a working configuration to opt out from phased updates. To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/apt/+bug/1981672/+subscriptions -- Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages Post to : touch-packages@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
[Touch-packages] [Bug 1981672] Re: apt phased out broken code, missing documentation to opt out
Do you have a suggestion where to assign the bug if not to src:apt bin:apt-doc if not these? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to apt in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1981672 Title: apt phased out broken code, missing documentation to opt out Status in apt package in Ubuntu: Incomplete Bug description: Having the configuration at https://discourse.ubuntu.com/t/phased-updates-in-apt-in-21-04/20345/24 it fails to work. The phased updates get distributed on some hosts anyways for 22.04. Please properly document and test this, and provide a working configuration to opt out from phased updates. To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/apt/+bug/1981672/+subscriptions -- Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages Post to : touch-packages@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
[Touch-packages] [Bug 1981672] [NEW] apt phased out broken code, missing documentation to opt out
Public bug reported: Having the configuration at https://discourse.ubuntu.com/t/phased-updates-in-apt-in-21-04/20345/24 it fails to work. The phased updates get distributed on some hosts anyways for 22.04. Please properly document and test this, and provide a working configuration to opt out from phased updates. ** Affects: apt (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to apt in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1981672 Title: apt phased out broken code, missing documentation to opt out Status in apt package in Ubuntu: New Bug description: Having the configuration at https://discourse.ubuntu.com/t/phased-updates-in-apt-in-21-04/20345/24 it fails to work. The phased updates get distributed on some hosts anyways for 22.04. Please properly document and test this, and provide a working configuration to opt out from phased updates. To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/apt/+bug/1981672/+subscriptions -- Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages Post to : touch-packages@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
[Touch-packages] [Bug 1186376] Re: should support setting of whether or not to include phased updates
blog post linked from https://wiki.ubuntu.com/PhasedUpdates is not there anymore http://www.murraytwins.com/blog/?p=127 maybe not provide links that are not working? checking web.archive... http://web.archive.org/web/20160822051755/http://www.murraytwins.com/blog/?p=127 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to software-properties in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1186376 Title: should support setting of whether or not to include phased updates Status in software-properties package in Ubuntu: Triaged Bug description: update-manager is aware of an apt configuration option to either "Always-Include-Phased-Updates" or "Never-Include-Phased-Updates", however there no user interface for creating or changing this setting. I think it makes sense for software-properties (probably in the "Updates" tab) to have the ability to set the option as to whether or not phased updates are always or never included. To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/software-properties/+bug/1186376/+subscriptions -- Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages Post to : touch-packages@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
[Touch-packages] [Bug 298617] Re: Popularity Contest should be uninstallable
** Changed in: popularity-contest (Ubuntu) Status: Triaged => Fix Released -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to ubuntu-meta in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/298617 Title: Popularity Contest should be uninstallable Status in popularity-contest package in Ubuntu: Fix Released Status in ubuntu-meta package in Ubuntu: Triaged Bug description: Binary package hint: popularity-contest Popularity Contest is (at least in hardy) enabled by default. It now has a dependency with ubuntu-standard, and no menu item in "services". This means that switching it off cannot be done via the GNOME UI. There are several reasons why a user or administrator would like to switch it off. I see no reason for the dependency with ubuntu-standard, except in order to FORCE users to enable it when using Ubuntu. Making it recommended for ubuntu-standard, instead of a hard dependency would enable me to uninstall it using synaptic package manager. To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/popularity-contest/+bug/298617/+subscriptions -- Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages Post to : touch-packages@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
[Touch-packages] [Bug 1596198] Re: unable to decode qr code from image file
Works with 0.22! ** Changed in: zbar (Ubuntu) Status: Confirmed => Fix Released -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to zbar in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1596198 Title: unable to decode qr code from image file Status in zbar package in Ubuntu: Fix Released Bug description: zbarimg --verbose=7 /tmp/qr.png scanned 0 barcode symbols from 1 images in 0.1 seconds WARNING: barcode data was not detected in some image(s) things to check: - is the barcode type supported? currently supported symbologies are: EAN/UPC (EAN-13, EAN-8, UPC-A, UPC-E, ISBN-10, ISBN-13), Code 128, Code 39 and Interleaved 2 of 5 - is the barcode large enough in the image? - is the barcode mostly in focus? - is there sufficient contrast/illumination? dump_stats: symbol sets allocated = 1 dump_stats: scanner syms in use = 0 recycled = 0 dump_stats: image syms in use = 0 recycled = 0 dump_stats: symbols allocated = 0 dump_stats: recycled[0]= 0 dump_stats: recycled[1]= 0 dump_stats: recycled[2]= 0 dump_stats: recycled[3]= 0 dump_stats: recycled[4]= 0 _zbar_qr_destroy: max finder lines = 511x511 I expected zbarimg to decode the image, because when using zbarimg on OpenSuSE it correctly decodes. ProblemType: Bug DistroRelease: Ubuntu 16.04 Package: zbar-tools 0.10+doc-10ubuntu1 Uname: Linux 4.7.0-999-generic x86_64 ApportVersion: 2.20.1-0ubuntu2.1 Architecture: amd64 CurrentDesktop: GNOME Date: Sat Jun 25 17:39:10 2016 InstallationDate: Installed on 2015-12-02 (206 days ago) InstallationMedia: Ubuntu-GNOME 16.04 LTS "Xenial Xerus" - Alpha amd64 (20151027) SourcePackage: zbar UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install) To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/zbar/+bug/1596198/+subscriptions -- Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages Post to : touch-packages@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
[Touch-packages] [Bug 1185157] Re: zbar: JPEG datastream contains no image
** Changed in: zbar (Ubuntu) Status: In Progress => Fix Released -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to zbar in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1185157 Title: zbar: JPEG datastream contains no image Status in zbar package in Ubuntu: Fix Released Bug description: zbar-0.10 has a problem with its JPEG handling. Specifically, libjpeg can request that zbar skip forward in its input, but zbar-0.10 does not implement this callback, instead it returns EOF. This manifests as certain JPEGs causing the error "JPEG datastream contains no image", when in fact the JPEG does contain an image. This was reported upstream [1] and fixed in trunk two years ago [2], but an updated version of zbar still has not been released. I contacted the zbar maintainer but got no response. This patch currently ships with the Homebrew formula on OSX [3], but Ubuntu users are still encountering this issue [4]. [1] http://sourceforge.net/p/zbar/discussion/664596/thread/58b8d79b [2] http://sourceforge.net/p/zbar/code/ci/825b6ec9244619cc616d592e657fc64b5d7b2c25/tree/zbar/jpeg.c?diff=0e183788061038ad5a32543e594ebe48bde89971 [3] https://github.com/mxcl/homebrew/pull/19291 [4] https://github.com/willglynn/ruby-zbar/issues/2#issuecomment-18515415 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/zbar/+bug/1185157/+subscriptions -- Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages Post to : touch-packages@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
[Touch-packages] [Bug 40189] Re: [SRU] [xenial] autofs needs to be restarted to pick up some shares
Of 100 machines, it works 95 times. There's cases where it'd still fail with 18.04 Bionic here. ** Summary changed: - [SRU] [xenial] autofs needs to be restarted to pick up some shares + [SRU] [xenial] [bionic] autofs needs to be restarted to pick up some shares -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to upstart in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/40189 Title: [SRU] [xenial] [bionic] autofs needs to be restarted to pick up some shares Status in autofs package in Ubuntu: Fix Released Status in autofs5 package in Ubuntu: Invalid Status in upstart package in Ubuntu: Invalid Status in autofs source package in Xenial: Incomplete Bug description: I am using autofs to access shares on a Windows XP machine from a Kubuntu AMD64 machine. The problems applies in both Breezy and Dapper. EDIT: confirmed with similar configuration on Intrepid with a NetApp filer hosting NFS. Server OS removed from summary. When I first try to access the mount point via cd or in Konqueror it does not exist. However, if I then restart autofs (/etc/init.d/autofs restart) everythin then works OK. My config files are: auto.master # # $Id: auto.master,v 1.3 2003/09/29 08:22:35 raven Exp $ # # Sample auto.master file # This is an automounter map and it has the following format # key [ -mount-options-separated-by-comma ] location # For details of the format look at autofs(5). #/misc/etc/auto.misc --timeout=60 #/misc/etc/auto.misc #/net /etc/auto.net /petunia /etc/petunia.misc --timeout=60 petunia.misc # # $Id: auto.misc,v 1.2 2003/09/29 08:22:35 raven Exp $ # # This is an automounter map and it has the following format # key [ -mount-options-separated-by-comma ] location # Details may be found in the autofs(5) manpage cd -fstype=iso9660,ro,nosuid,nodev :/dev/cdrom tony -fstype=smbfs,defaults,password=xxx,fmask=777,dmask=777 ://192.168.1.2/tony chris -fstype=smbfs,defaults,password=xxx,fmask=777,dmask=777 ://192.168.1.2/chris shared-fstype=smbfs,defaults,password=xxx,fmask=777,dmask=777 ://192.168.1.2/SharedDocs linuxbackups -fstype=smbfs,defaults,password=xxx,fmask=777,dmask=777 ://192.168.1.2/linuxbackups To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/autofs/+bug/40189/+subscriptions -- Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages Post to : touch-packages@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
[Touch-packages] [Bug 575040] Re: tftpd-hpa.postinst keeps hanging with a Password: prompt
** Changed in: shadow (Ubuntu) Status: Incomplete => Fix Released ** Changed in: tftp-hpa (Debian) Status: New => Fix Released -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to shadow in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/575040 Title: tftpd-hpa.postinst keeps hanging with a Password: prompt Status in shadow package in Ubuntu: Fix Released Status in tftp-hpa package in Debian: Fix Released Bug description: Binary package hint: tftp-hpa # aptitude install tftpd-hpa Setting up tftpd-hpa (5.0-11ubuntu2) ... Password: The problem is one that also Debian has when you get /etc/passwd and /etc/shadow via NIS, chfn from the passwd package fails. It tries this command: adduser: `/usr/bin/chfn -f tftp daemon tftp' exited from signal 2. Exiting. which just doesn't work. To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/shadow/+bug/575040/+subscriptions -- Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages Post to : touch-packages@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
[Touch-packages] [Bug 1030022] Re: Port from legacy Xlib to modern XCB
** Changed in: amiwm (Ubuntu) Status: New => Invalid -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to gtk+3.0 in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1030022 Title: Port from legacy Xlib to modern XCB Status in Compiz: Triaged Status in 9wm package in Ubuntu: New Status in aewm package in Ubuntu: New Status in aewm++ package in Ubuntu: New Status in afterstep package in Ubuntu: New Status in amiwm package in Ubuntu: Invalid Status in blackbox package in Ubuntu: New Status in cairo package in Ubuntu: New Status in compiz package in Ubuntu: Triaged Status in ctwm package in Ubuntu: New Status in dwm package in Ubuntu: Opinion Status in enlightenment package in Ubuntu: New Status in fvwm package in Ubuntu: New Status in fvwm1 package in Ubuntu: New Status in gtk+3.0 package in Ubuntu: New Status in icewm package in Ubuntu: New Status in jwm package in Ubuntu: Invalid Status in larswm package in Ubuntu: New Status in lwm package in Ubuntu: New Status in matchbox-window-manager package in Ubuntu: New Status in metacity package in Ubuntu: Invalid Status in miwm package in Ubuntu: New Status in muffin package in Ubuntu: New Status in mutter package in Ubuntu: New Status in pekwm package in Ubuntu: New Status in ratpoison package in Ubuntu: New Status in sapphire package in Ubuntu: New Status in sawfish package in Ubuntu: New Status in spectrwm package in Ubuntu: Fix Released Status in tinywm package in Ubuntu: New Status in tritium package in Ubuntu: New Status in twm package in Ubuntu: New Status in vtwm package in Ubuntu: New Status in w9wm package in Ubuntu: New Status in windowlab package in Ubuntu: New Status in wm2 package in Ubuntu: New Status in wmaker package in Ubuntu: Opinion Status in xmonad package in Ubuntu: New Bug description: Port/rewrite the window manager to use the modern XCB (X C Binding) library instead of the old legacy Xlib. To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/compiz/+bug/1030022/+subscriptions -- Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages Post to : touch-packages@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
[Touch-packages] [Bug 1030022] Re: Port from legacy Xlib to modern XCB
** Changed in: amiwm (Ubuntu) Assignee: (unassigned) => Lenin (gagarin) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to gtk+3.0 in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1030022 Title: Port from legacy Xlib to modern XCB Status in Compiz: Triaged Status in 9wm package in Ubuntu: New Status in aewm package in Ubuntu: New Status in aewm++ package in Ubuntu: New Status in afterstep package in Ubuntu: New Status in amiwm package in Ubuntu: New Status in blackbox package in Ubuntu: New Status in cairo package in Ubuntu: New Status in compiz package in Ubuntu: Triaged Status in ctwm package in Ubuntu: New Status in dwm package in Ubuntu: Opinion Status in enlightenment package in Ubuntu: New Status in fvwm package in Ubuntu: New Status in fvwm1 package in Ubuntu: New Status in gtk+3.0 package in Ubuntu: New Status in icewm package in Ubuntu: New Status in jwm package in Ubuntu: Invalid Status in larswm package in Ubuntu: New Status in lwm package in Ubuntu: New Status in matchbox-window-manager package in Ubuntu: New Status in metacity package in Ubuntu: Invalid Status in miwm package in Ubuntu: New Status in muffin package in Ubuntu: New Status in mutter package in Ubuntu: New Status in pekwm package in Ubuntu: New Status in ratpoison package in Ubuntu: New Status in sapphire package in Ubuntu: New Status in sawfish package in Ubuntu: New Status in spectrwm package in Ubuntu: Fix Released Status in tinywm package in Ubuntu: New Status in tritium package in Ubuntu: New Status in twm package in Ubuntu: New Status in vtwm package in Ubuntu: New Status in w9wm package in Ubuntu: New Status in windowlab package in Ubuntu: New Status in wm2 package in Ubuntu: New Status in wmaker package in Ubuntu: Opinion Status in xmonad package in Ubuntu: New Bug description: Port/rewrite the window manager to use the modern XCB (X C Binding) library instead of the old legacy Xlib. To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/compiz/+bug/1030022/+subscriptions -- Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages Post to : touch-packages@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
[Touch-packages] [Bug 1500768] Re: python3.4.3 SRU break requests
+1 @#8 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to python3.4 in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1500768 Title: python3.4.3 SRU break requests Status in python3.4 package in Ubuntu: Triaged Status in python3.4 source package in Trusty: Triaged Bug description: Sicne the upgade to python 3.4.3 on trusty, I'm getting this error when using a squid proxy: https://jenkins.qa.ubuntu.com/view/All/job/udtc-trusty-tests/1946/label=ps-trusty-desktop-amd64-1,type=large/testReport/tests.large.test_android/AndroidSDKTests/test_default_android_sdk_install/ The code is using python-requests, with verify=True for ssl connection (default). Some tests are testing that invalid certificates are rejected: https://github.com/ubuntu/ubuntu- make/blob/master/umake/network/download_center.py#L129 Rerunning the same code with previous trusty package (3.4.0~trusty1) doesn't show up this issue. It seems that SNI is broken for the trusty version of python3-requests with 3.4.3. (See the FAQ http://www .python-requests.org/en/latest/community/faq/ with "What are “hostname doesn’t match” errors?" and the stackoverflow question. I did run a test, grabbing requests 2.7 and backporting it to trusty (I needed to as well to take python3-urllib3 willy version). So, 3.4.3 has an incompatible change for existing projects and people with proxys are starting to see some breakage like in https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-make/+bug/1499890. Can we get it fix somehow, reverting the incompatible change breaking SNI (I wonder if this is "Changed in version 3.4.3: This class now performs all the necessary certificate and hostname checks by default. To revert to the previous, unverified, behavior ssl._create_unverified_context() can be passed to the context parameter." in https://docs.python.org/3/library/http.client.html or something else) so that existing code can either get a new compatible python-requests or avoid incompatible changes in python 3.4.3? To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/python3.4/+bug/1500768/+subscriptions -- Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages Post to : touch-packages@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
