** Description changed:
- Test case:
- - generate a cachedb with apt-ftparchive from lucid via
-apt-ftparchive --db old-db 2vcard_0.5-3_all.deb
+ TEST CASE:
+ 1. generate a cachedb with apt-ftparchive from lucid via
+ apt-ftparchive --db old-db packages 2vcard_0.5-3_all.deb Packages.1
-
** Description changed:
TEST CASE:
1. generate a cachedb with apt-ftparchive from lucid via
apt-ftparchive --db old-db packages 2vcard_0.5-3_all.deb Packages.1
- use apt-ftparchive from precise and run
- apt-ftparchive --db old-db 2vcard_0.5-3_all.deb
- and verify that the
** Changed in: apt (Ubuntu)
Status: In Progress = Fix Released
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to apt in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1324399
Title:
apt-get failing to show progress with yes
** Attachment added: lspci
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/lightdm/+bug/1365855/+attachment/4200324/+files/lspci.out
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to lightdm in Ubuntu.
** Attachment added: xorg
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/lightdm/+bug/1365855/+attachment/4200325/+files/Xorg.0.log
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to lightdm in Ubuntu.
** Attachment added: lightdm log
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/lightdm/+bug/1365855/+attachment/4200326/+files/lightdm.log
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to lightdm in Ubuntu.
Thanks, I attached the logs you requested. With 1.11.9-0ubuntu1 the
problem presists. I don't know when exactly it started but it happend
relatively recently. It might be a issue with the setup of X done by
lightdm, because when I launch my session via gdm I don't see this
problem.
Whats
** Branch linked: lp:~mvo/phablet-tools/pkcon-allow-untrusted
** Changed in: phablet-tools (Ubuntu)
Status: Confirmed = Fix Committed
** Changed in: phablet-tools (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided = High
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch
I installed unity8-destktop-session-x11 to test click on the desktop but
I did not change any config (to my knowledge :) except for installing
this package. I actually thought I had unity8-desktop-session-mir
installed, but it seems that during testing I moved to the other one.
And indeed, when I
** Changed in: apt (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided = Critical
** Changed in: apt (Ubuntu)
Status: New = In Progress
** Changed in: apt (Ubuntu)
Assignee: (unassigned) = Michael Vogt (mvo)
** Bug watch added: Debian Bug tracker #762079
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin
** Patch added: debdiff with the fix for lucid
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/apt/+bug/1371058/+attachment/4207352/+files/apt_0.7.25.3ubuntu9.17.debdiff
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to apt in
** Patch added: debdiff with the fix for trusty
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/apt/+bug/1371058/+attachment/4207371/+files/apt_1.0.1ubuntu2.4.debdiff
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to apt in
Note that this also fixes a segfault due to a broken
FileFD::ReadOnlyGzip in this particular apt version.
** Patch added: debdiff with the fix for precise
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/apt/+bug/1371058/+attachment/4207383/+files/apt_0.8.16%7Eexp12ubuntu10.20.debdiff
--
You
Thanks a lot Stefan (comment #4) for confirming that the patch works and
I'm very sorry for this regression.
I created a PPA with the fix. It can be added via:
$ sudo apt-add-repository ppa:mvo/lp1371058
It contains packages for apt with the debdiff attached here applied. So if you
are running
** Branch linked: lp:~mvo/click/lp1245826-multiple-hookfiles
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to click in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1245826
Title:
Allow applying a hook to multiple files
Status
This feature is also useful for the click-systemd and click-bin-path
packages.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to click in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1245826
Title:
Allow applying a hook to
I just finished a full upgrade with the xorg-lts-transitional package
and can confirm that it works. Without the package bug #1347964 will be
triggered so it would be good if this could go in soon.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages,
And I just verified that the commit before the offending one (66706285)
fully works and upgrades the system correctly. The immediate-configure
property is also better honored.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to
This diff works for me:
diff --git a/apt-pkg/packagemanager.cc b/apt-pkg/packagemanager.cc
index 393f836..57d4b5a 100644
--- a/apt-pkg/packagemanager.cc
+++ b/apt-pkg/packagemanager.cc
@@ -406,6 +406,12 @@ bool pkgPackageManager::SmartConfigure(PkgIterator Pkg, int
if
** Patch added: diff with the fix
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/apt/+bug/1347721/+attachment/4164541/+files/lp1347721.diff
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to apt in Ubuntu.
Hm, now that saucy is closed, how can I upload a updated apt into saucy-
updates that contains the fix?
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to apt in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1347721
Title:
Saucy -
Some more work is needed fo the patch, its eliminating too many case.
But the direction is there, the SmartConfigure() is currently trying to
configure too much too early when its not really needed.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages,
A improved version of the patch, I tested it with:
- precise build chroot - trusty
- saucy build chroot - trusty
- trusty build chroot - utopic (2014-07-29)
and it worked for those cases correctly.
The bug was that apt tried to SmartUnPack packages that were
dependencies but did not need
** Also affects: apt (Ubuntu Trusty)
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
** Also affects: apt (Ubuntu Utopic)
Importance: Critical
Assignee: Michael Vogt (mvo)
Status: In Progress
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded
I also did a precise-trusty-utopic upgrade cycle with the patch (the
precise base that triggered #1347964 before) and again all good.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to apt in Ubuntu.
** Changed in: apt (Ubuntu Trusty)
Assignee: (unassigned) = Michael Vogt (mvo)
** Changed in: apt (Ubuntu Trusty)
Milestone: None = ubuntu-14.04.2
** Changed in: apt (Ubuntu Trusty)
Importance: Undecided = High
** Changed in: apt (Ubuntu Trusty)
Status: New = In Progress
** Patch removed: diff with the fix
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/apt/+bug/1347721/+attachment/4164541/+files/lp1347721.diff
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to apt in Ubuntu.
.
This is debian bug https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-
bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=764244
** Affects: util-linux (Ubuntu)
Importance: Critical
Assignee: Michael Vogt (mvo)
Status: In Progress
** Changed in: util-linux (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided = Critical
** Changed in: util-linux
Public bug reported:
The recent security update make it easy to trigger debian bug #710924 -
i.e. apt does not deal well with 416 requests from the remote server.
TEST CASE:
1 install latest apt from security
2 run sudo apt-get update
3 run sudo apt-get update again and ctrl somewhere in the
** Changed in: util-linux (Ubuntu)
Status: In Progress = Fix Released
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to util-linux in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1381570
Title:
libuuid1 uses chsh in
** Also affects: apt (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to apt in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1043298
Title:
more information about errors on
** Changed in: gzip (Ubuntu)
Status: New = Fix Committed
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to gzip in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1385793
Title:
Merge 1.6-4 from debian
Status in “gzip”
Public bug reported:
When no /etc/machine-id file is present the boot breaks.
Once this bug is fixed we can modify live-build so that it remove /etc
/machine-id from the generated live rootfs instead of truncating it.
** Affects: systemd (Ubuntu)
Importance: Medium
Status: Triaged
** Description changed:
When no /etc/machine-id file is present the boot breaks. For our goal of
a empty /etc this is bad.
+
+ Once this bug is fixed we can modify live-build so that it remove /etc
+ /machine-id from the generated live rootfs instead of truncating it.
--
You received this
** Description changed:
- When no /etc/machine-id file is present the boot breaks. This is
- problematic for things like live-build which should remove the installer
- image's /etc/machine-id.
+ When no /etc/machine-id file is present the boot breaks.
+
+ Once this bug is fixed we can modify
Increase importance as this breaks upgrades.
** Changed in: autopilot (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided = Critical
** Changed in: dbus-property-service (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided = Critical
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages,
Thanks for your bugreport.
What do you get if you run:
$ sudo apt-get install -f
?
Do you have a main.log file somewhere in /var/log/dist-upgrade/* (maybe in a
surdirectory)? Having that attached to this bugreport would be helperful to
find out what exactly happend.
Thanks,
Michael
--
You
Thanks Colin and sorry for the trouble.
I looked into this now and reworked the way that the stopping happens.
It seems to be reliable now and gets the correct appid that is then
passed to app-launch-stop.
However the app still does not stop because ubuntu-app-stop needs to
talk to the users
I pushed a version that correctly gets the dbus session bus and stops
the app for click unregister in lp:~mvo/click/lp1232130-kill-on-
remove-2/ - however its not yet working under PK I'm looking into this
now.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch
*** This bug is a security vulnerability ***
Public security bug reported:
Apt creates the tempfile for apt-get changelog in a insecure fashion.
See https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=763780 for the
details
** Affects: apt (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
** Patch added: debdiff for trusty
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/apt/+bug/1378680/+attachment/4228234/+files/apt_1.0.1ubuntu2.5.debdiff
** Changed in: apt (Ubuntu Utopic)
Assignee: (unassigned) = Michael Vogt (mvo)
** Changed in: apt (Ubuntu Utopic)
Status: New
** Patch added: precise debdiff
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/apt/+bug/1378680/+attachment/4228233/+files/apt_0.8.16%7Eexp12ubuntu10.21.debdiff
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to apt in Ubuntu.
** Changed in: click (Ubuntu)
Status: Triaged = In Progress
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to ubuntu-touch-meta in
Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1232130
Title:
Uninstalling an app doesn't
** Changed in: click (Ubuntu)
Status: Triaged = In Progress
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to click in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1245826
Title:
Allow applying a hook to multiple files
Public bug reported:
The ubuntu-touch image uses the click-user-hoks.conf upstart session
hook to run click hook run-user so that the hooks for the user are
updated.
The core images have /usr/lib/systemd/user/click-user-hooks.service that
does the same but apparently its not always working
** Description changed:
The ubuntu-touch image uses the click-user-hoks.conf upstart session
hook to run click hook run-user so that the hooks for the user are
- updated. Something similar needs to be done on the ubuntu-core system-
- image images.
+ updated.
+
+ The core images have
** Changed in: click (Ubuntu)
Status: New = In Progress
** Changed in: click (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided = Medium
** Changed in: click (Ubuntu)
Importance: Medium = High
** Changed in: click (Ubuntu)
Assignee: (unassigned) = Michael Vogt (mvo)
--
You received this bug
Public bug reported:
I use a n4 with the vivid channel and I'm on image #20. When I go to a
app in the store and click on Install I see now change in the UI, i.e.
no download progress, no change in the button etc. But I do see activity
in the u-d-m download logs and eventually the screen will
Public bug reported:
I have a ssd/hdd system where the ssd is used for the system and most of
home is on a large hdd.
I noticed that the weekly fstrim cron job slows the system down considerable,
including e.g. firefox and
the desktop. iotop reports:
otal DISK READ : 0.00 B/s | Total
** Description changed:
I have a ssd/hdd system where the ssd is used for the system and most of
home is on a large hdd.
I noticed that the weekly fstrim cron job slows the system down considerable,
including e.g. firefox and
the desktop. iotop reports:
otal DISK READ :
** Also affects: util-linux (Ubuntu Trusty)
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
** Also affects: util-linux (Ubuntu Utopic)
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to
** Changed in: util-linux (Ubuntu Trusty)
Status: New = Invalid
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to util-linux in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1393542
Title:
SRU: exfat not detected by blkid
This is fixed with click 0.4.34.2
(https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/click/0.4.34.2):
click (0.4.34.2) vivid; urgency=medium
...
[ David Planella ]
* Adds internationalization tools and CMake macros required by the
new Qt Creator app and scope templates that provide internationalization
Thanks for your bugreport.
I'm happy to add this, but some changes are required:
Rename the package to qt5-qmake-arm-linux-gnueabihf so that it follows
the same convention as the other tools, this way click chroot.py can
install it in the same way as g++/pkg-config and does the right thing
for
?
** Changed in: click (Ubuntu)
Assignee: Michael Vogt (mvo) = Zoltan Balogh (bzoltan)
** Changed in: click (Ubuntu)
Status: Confirmed = Incomplete
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to click in Ubuntu.
https
** Branch linked: lp:~mvo/click/lp1394256-run-user-hooks
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to click in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1394256
Title:
click user hooks are not run when click install
Public bug reported:
After a click chroot is created there is currently no way to upgrade
it. This is important if e.g. libraries in the framework get added.
** Affects: click (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
--
You received this bug notification because you are a
I agree with Colin here, we need to get find all directories and
consider if removing the data is something we should do or offer a
choice to the user. If its important to remove the config, the attached
(untested) patch should work , I will try to get it into better shape
soon (proper test,
** Branch linked: lp:~mvo/click/lp1358294-config-removal
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to click in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1358294
Title:
App .config not removed when app uninstalled
Status
I attached a branch *if* we want to to this. However I share the
concerns of Jamie and Seth that this needs some more spec work.
Especially from the design team if its desirable to remove the data on
uninstall. I like the idea of having a UI for this. But we could remove
the cache data.
** Patch
The attached branch is now in line with Michał's comment #9 - it will
delete the $XDG_{CONFIG,CACHE}_DIR but leave the data dir.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to click in Ubuntu.
** Changed in: click
Status: New = Invalid
** Changed in: click (Ubuntu)
Status: New = In Progress
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to click in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1346723
We can do multiple things here, we can test before install via statvfs()
if there is enough free space, but that won't help if the spacing is
filling up while installing. So we need to ensure dpkg reports a out-of-
diskspace error via e.g. the status-fd (which we are currently not using
AFAIK.
**
Hi,
this is doing it in a different way than my previous patch that does not
require a interactive answer during install. It does require however
that the patch goes to the packagekit upstream people.
This needs the lp:~mvo/click/lp1360582-honor-enum-only-trusted/ branch
too.
** Patch added:
** Bug watch added: freedesktop.org Bugzilla #83075
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=83075
** Also affects: click via
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=83075
Importance: Unknown
Status: Unknown
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member
@alexander: we definitely need to coordinate the landing. For a hotfix I
created lp:~mvo/click/lp1360582-hotfix that implements Colins
suggestion in #5.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to click in Ubuntu.
** Project changed: click = packagekit
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to click in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1360582
Title:
Can't manually install clicks Signature verification error since
#205
The packagekit patch has landed upstream and I pushed it into utopic
now. Next step is that the SDK need to run pkcon --allow-untrusted
when it installs the locally build click. Plus it needs to add a
versionized dependency to packagekit-tools (= 0.8.17-4ubuntu2) to
ensure the commandline option
** Branch linked: lp:~mvo/qtcreator-plugin-ubuntu/lp1360582
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to click in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1360582
Title:
Can't manually install clicks Signature
** Branch linked: lp:~mvo/click/lp1360582-honor-enum-only-trusted
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to click in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1360582
Title:
Can't manually install clicks Signature
The version of system-config-printer in utopic does no longer depend on
python-gobject.
** Changed in: system-config-printer (Ubuntu)
Status: Confirmed = Fix Released
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to
Public bug reported:
The gir1.2-* libraries are currently using /usr/lib/girepository-1.0 -
this makes installing them as Multi-Arch: same impossible. We should
instead follow what debian is doing in experimental and install into
/usr/lib/$triplet/girepository-1.0.
** Affects:
** Summary changed:
- support multi-arch
+ [FFe] support multi-arch
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to gobject-introspection in
Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1365010
Title:
[FFe] support multi-arch
** Branch linked: lp:~mvo/click/debsigs-verify
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to click in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1330770
Title:
click packages rely upon tls for integrity and authenticity
** Changed in: click (Ubuntu)
Status: New = In Progress
** Changed in: click (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided = High
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to click in Ubuntu.
I followed your steps and ran the last one (./click.sh) in a loop for
~1.5h without hitting the error. The image I used is r131. Is there
anything else I can do to try to reproduce.
** Changed in: click (Ubuntu)
Status: New = Incomplete
--
You received this bug notification because you
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 1319153 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1319153
Thanks for your bugreport. This is fixed in utopic. If its important to
you we can consider a backport of the fix, please followup on #1319153.
** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 1319153
I think that is a good idea to provide information about this, I have a
branch at lp:~mvo/click/frameworks.json that adds the information about
deprecated/current/devel to the frameworks. Extending the branch to list
that is simple enough. One open question for me is where the information
about
I don't quite see the same here on my n4, I only have:
$ ls -l /var/lib/apparmor/clicks/*json |wc -l
33
$ click list|wc -l
30
$ sudo click list|wc -l
22
And when further investigating I see that filemanager is in two versions
installed (one for phablet, one for root):
$ ls -l
Thanks for your bugreport.
This sounds like there is some sort of network problem. Could you please let
use now if:
$ sudo apt-get update
works corrently for you? And what the output of the command:
$ w3m -dump http://archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/dists/utopic/Release.gpg
in a terminal is?
**
** Also affects: qtcreator-plugin-ubuntu (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to click in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1346723
Title:
Cannot delete my
Thanks for your bugreport.
The part that is failing is the umount after the chroot got cleaned.
This part is done by the
share/qtcreator/ubuntu/scripts/click_destroy_target in the qtcreator-
plugin-ubuntu tree (see lines 33pp of the script). So I simply
reassigning to click without any further
** Branch linked: lp:~mvo/click/lp1346723-chroot
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to click in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1346723
Title:
Cannot delete my chroot.
Status in Click packages:
New
** Attachment added: Chroot that triggers the bug with a small set of
dependencies
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/apt/+bug/1347721/+attachment/4162808/+files/upgrade-bug-smaller4.tar.gz
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded
It seems like the issue is the following:
There is a dependency loop
mountall-udev-procps-initscripts-mountall. When apt tries to deal
with it, it configures them all initially together, then it finds the
libplymouth4 dependency of mountall that is not unpacked yet and
inserts the unpack at this
I bisected this now (as the precise apt did not trigger the bug in the
chroot) and it it appears to be caused by:
42d51f333e8ef522fed02cdfc48663488d56c3a3
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to apt in Ubuntu.
** Also affects: software-properties (Ubuntu Trusty)
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to software-properties in
Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1383289
Title:
Is there consensus on this now? I'm happy to land the branch, is Jamies
comment in #15 addressed?
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to click in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1358294
Title:
App .config
** Changed in: click (Ubuntu)
Status: Triaged = In Progress
** Changed in: click (Ubuntu)
Assignee: (unassigned) = Michael Vogt (mvo)
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to click in Ubuntu.
https
** Branch linked: lp:~mvo/click/lp1232130-kill-on-remove-2
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to ubuntu-touch-meta in
Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1232130
Title:
Uninstalling an app doesn't stop it
I just noticed the open task for ubuntu-system-settings about doing a
addtional hashsum check for the download. Fwiw, click is already doing a
gpg verification before the install so corrupted/MITMed clicks will not
get installed there. Having the hash check may still be a good idea for
e.g. better
Fwiw, we have support for the by-hash scheme in apt in experimetnal:
https://github.com/Debian/apt/blob/debian/experimental/apt-pkg/acquire-item.cc#L1222
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to apt in Ubuntu.
** Changed in: apt (Ubuntu Precise)
Status: New = In Progress
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to apt in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1429041
Title:
Autoremoval not working reliable on precise
** Patch added: possible fix for this
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/apt/+bug/1429041/+attachment/4335982/+files/apt_0.8.16%7Eexp12ubuntu10.23.debdiff
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to apt in
Public bug reported:
The APT::Never-MarkAuto-Sections in precise is not working reliable. Apt
is not always looking at the section of the version to be installed but
instead may look at a random versions section.
This breaks apt-get autoremove for no-longer-required kernels.
** Affects: apt
** Description changed:
The APT::Never-MarkAuto-Sections in precise is not working reliable. Apt
is not always looking at the section of the version to be installed but
- instead may look at the install version section.
+ instead may look at a random versions section.
This breaks apt-get
Public bug reported:
The current system-image-common package in the
https://launchpad.net/~barry/+archive/ubuntu/systemimage/+build/7052762
PPA contains: Depends: ..., ubuntu-download-manager, For snappy
we would like to have ubuntu-download-manager | python3-pycurl to
avoid pulling in this
Public bug reported:
A minor thing. system-image-cli --help shows that the -C option takes
a file. My understanding is that in 3.0 it takes a directory (as well?).
Would be nice if the --help output could be updated.
** Affects: system-image (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided
Status:
)
-- Michael Vogt m...@debian.org Mon, 23 Feb 2015 12:54:03 +0100
apt (1.0.9.6) unstable; urgency=medium
[ Michael Vogt ]
* Fix missing URIStart() for https downloads
* Add regression test for the previous commit
[ David Kalnischkies ]
* 128 KiB DSC files ought
Public bug reported:
I would like to merge the latest fixes from the debian/sid apt branch.
Those are. It also includes a fix for #1429041.
apt (1.0.9.7) unstable; urgency=medium
[ Tomasz Buchert ]
* Fix crash in the apt-transport-https when Owner is NULL (Closes: #778375)
-- Michael Vogt
1 - 100 of 349 matches
Mail list logo
