[Touch-packages] [Bug 2059418] Re: Bluetooth earbuds not being 'set up' on new machine

2024-04-02 Thread Bill Gradwohl
Purchased via : https://www.amazon.com/gp/product/B0C3W4MNN1

FCC ID:2A33A-T60

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to bluez in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2059418

Title:
  Bluetooth earbuds not being 'set up' on new machine

Status in bluez package in Ubuntu:
  Incomplete

Bug description:
  The problem concerns earbuds 0B:20:24:A3:E7:56 T60 that worked
  perfectly under completely patched Ubuntu 22.04 on my old machine but
  now refuse to be setup on a new box running completely patched Ubuntu
  22.04 . Other old bluetooth gadgets attached without issue.

  The end result at the very bottom of this page indicates ‘requestor
  exited before bonding was completed’ .


  root@bill:~# bluetoothctl --version
  bluetoothctl: 5.64
  root@bill:~# hciconfig -a
  hci0: Type: Primary Bus: USB
  BD Address: BC:C7:46:9D:25:98 ACL MTU: 1021:8 SCO MTU: 255:12
  UP RUNNING PSCAN
  RX bytes:11627 acl:0 sco:0 events:466 errors:0
  TX bytes:78563 acl:0 sco:0 commands:422 errors:0
  Features: 0xff 0xff 0xff 0xfe 0xdb 0xfd 0x7b 0x87
  Packet type: DM1 DM3 DM5 DH1 DH3 DH5 HV1 HV2 HV3
  Link policy: RSWITCH HOLD SNIFF PARK
  Link mode: PERIPHERAL ACCEPT
  Name: 'bill'
  Class: 0x7c0104
  Service Classes: Rendering, Capturing, Object Transfer, Audio, Telephony
  Device Class: Computer, Desktop workstation
  HCI Version: (0xc) Revision: 0x40d
  LMP Version: (0xc) Subversion: 0x7225
  Manufacturer: Realtek Semiconductor Corporation (93)

  
  root@bill:~# bluetoothctl
  Agent registered
  [CHG] Controller BC:C7:46:9D:25:98 Pairable: yes
  [bluetooth]# show
  Controller BC:C7:46:9D:25:98 (public)
  Name: bill
  Alias: bill
  Class: 0x007c0104
  Powered: yes
  Discoverable: no
  DiscoverableTimeout: 0x00b4
  Pairable: yes
  UUID: Message Notification Se.. (1133--1000-8000-00805f9b34fb)
  UUID: A/V Remote Control (110e--1000-8000-00805f9b34fb)
  UUID: OBEX Object Push (1105--1000-8000-00805f9b34fb)
  UUID: Message Access Server (1132--1000-8000-00805f9b34fb)
  UUID: PnP Information (1200--1000-8000-00805f9b34fb)
  UUID: IrMC Sync (1104--1000-8000-00805f9b34fb)
  UUID: Vendor specific (5005--1000-8000-0002ee01)
  UUID: Headset (1108--1000-8000-00805f9b34fb)
  UUID: A/V Remote Control Target (110c--1000-8000-00805f9b34fb)
  UUID: Generic Attribute Profile (1801--1000-8000-00805f9b34fb)
  UUID: Phonebook Access Server (112f--1000-8000-00805f9b34fb)
  UUID: Audio Sink (110b--1000-8000-00805f9b34fb)
  UUID: Device Information (180a--1000-8000-00805f9b34fb)
  UUID: Generic Access Profile (1800--1000-8000-00805f9b34fb)
  UUID: Handsfree Audio Gateway (111f--1000-8000-00805f9b34fb)
  UUID: Audio Source (110a--1000-8000-00805f9b34fb)
  UUID: OBEX File Transfer (1106--1000-8000-00805f9b34fb)
  Modalias: usb:v1D6Bp0246d0540
  Discovering: no
  Roles: central
  Roles: peripheral
  Advertising Features:
  ActiveInstances: 0x00 (0)
  SupportedInstances: 0x0a (10)
  SupportedIncludes: tx-power
  SupportedIncludes: appearance
  SupportedIncludes: local-name
  SupportedSecondaryChannels: 1M
  SupportedSecondaryChannels: 2M
  SupportedSecondaryChannels: Coded
  [bluetooth]# devices
  Device 74:45:CE:BA:24:65 WH-CH710N

  
  At this point I started the earbuds (T60) having a problem getting set up.

  
  [CHG] Controller BC:C7:46:9D:25:98 Discoverable: yes
  [CHG] Controller BC:C7:46:9D:25:98 Discovering: yes
  [NEW] Device 34:95:04:4B:07:3C 34-95-04-4B-07-3C
  [CHG] Device 34:95:04:4B:07:3C RSSI: -86
  [NEW] Device 0B:20:24:A3:E7:56 T60
  [CHG] Device 0B:20:24:A3:E7:56 RSSI: -54
  [CHG] Device 0B:20:24:A3:E7:56 RSSI: -54
  [CHG] Device 0B:20:24:A3:E7:56 RSSI: -54
  [CHG] Device 0B:20:24:A3:E7:56 RSSI: -54
  [CHG] Device 0B:20:24:A3:E7:56 RSSI: -52
  [CHG] Device 0B:20:24:A3:E7:56 RSSI: -58
  [CHG] Device 0B:20:24:A3:E7:56 RSSI: -56
  [CHG] Device 0B:20:24:A3:E7:56 RSSI: -56
  [CHG] Device 0B:20:24:A3:E7:56 RSSI: -58
  [CHG] Device 0B:20:24:A3:E7:56 RSSI: -58
  [CHG] Device 0B:20:24:A3:E7:56 LegacyPairing: yes
  [CHG] Device 0B:20:24:A3:E7:56 RSSI: -60
  [CHG] Device 0B:20:24:A3:E7:56 RSSI: -60
  [CHG] Device 0B:20:24:A3:E7:56 LegacyPairing: no
  [CHG] Device 0B:20:24:A3:E7:56 RSSI: -58
  [CHG] Device 0B:20:24:A3:E7:56 RSSI: -64
  [CHG] Device 0B:20:24:A3:E7:56 RSSI: -60
  [CHG] Device 0B:20:24:A3:E7:56 RSSI: -60
  [CHG] Device 0B:20:24:A3:E7:56 RSSI: -60
  [CHG] Device 0B:20:24:A3:E7:56 RSSI: -60
  [CHG] Device 0B:20:24:A3:E7:56 RSSI: -60
  [CHG] Device 0B:20:24:A3:E7:56 RSSI: -72
  [CHG] Device 0B:20:24:A3:E7:56 RSSI: -72
  [CHG] Device 0B:20:24:A3:E7:56 RSSI: -72
  [CHG] Device 0B:20:24:A3:E7:56 RSSI: -72
  [CHG] Device 0B:20:24:A3:E7:56 RSSI: -72
  [CHG] Device 0B:20:24:A3:E7:56 RSSI: -48
  [CHG] Device 0B:20:24:A3:E7:56 RSSI: -48
  [CHG] Device 0B:20:24:A3:E7:56 LegacyPairing: yes
  [CHG] Device 0B:20:24:A3:E7

[Touch-packages] [Bug 2059418] [NEW] Bluetooth earbuds not being 'set up' on new machine

2024-03-28 Thread Bill Gradwohl
Public bug reported:

The problem concerns earbuds 0B:20:24:A3:E7:56 T60 that worked perfectly
under completely patched Ubuntu 22.04 on my old machine but now refuse
to be setup on a new box running completely patched Ubuntu 22.04 . Other
old bluetooth gadgets attached without issue.

The end result at the very bottom of this page indicates ‘requestor
exited before bonding was completed’ .


root@bill:~# bluetoothctl --version
bluetoothctl: 5.64
root@bill:~# hciconfig -a
hci0: Type: Primary Bus: USB
BD Address: BC:C7:46:9D:25:98 ACL MTU: 1021:8 SCO MTU: 255:12
UP RUNNING PSCAN
RX bytes:11627 acl:0 sco:0 events:466 errors:0
TX bytes:78563 acl:0 sco:0 commands:422 errors:0
Features: 0xff 0xff 0xff 0xfe 0xdb 0xfd 0x7b 0x87
Packet type: DM1 DM3 DM5 DH1 DH3 DH5 HV1 HV2 HV3
Link policy: RSWITCH HOLD SNIFF PARK
Link mode: PERIPHERAL ACCEPT
Name: 'bill'
Class: 0x7c0104
Service Classes: Rendering, Capturing, Object Transfer, Audio, Telephony
Device Class: Computer, Desktop workstation
HCI Version: (0xc) Revision: 0x40d
LMP Version: (0xc) Subversion: 0x7225
Manufacturer: Realtek Semiconductor Corporation (93)


root@bill:~# bluetoothctl
Agent registered
[CHG] Controller BC:C7:46:9D:25:98 Pairable: yes
[bluetooth]# show
Controller BC:C7:46:9D:25:98 (public)
Name: bill
Alias: bill
Class: 0x007c0104
Powered: yes
Discoverable: no
DiscoverableTimeout: 0x00b4
Pairable: yes
UUID: Message Notification Se.. (1133--1000-8000-00805f9b34fb)
UUID: A/V Remote Control (110e--1000-8000-00805f9b34fb)
UUID: OBEX Object Push (1105--1000-8000-00805f9b34fb)
UUID: Message Access Server (1132--1000-8000-00805f9b34fb)
UUID: PnP Information (1200--1000-8000-00805f9b34fb)
UUID: IrMC Sync (1104--1000-8000-00805f9b34fb)
UUID: Vendor specific (5005--1000-8000-0002ee01)
UUID: Headset (1108--1000-8000-00805f9b34fb)
UUID: A/V Remote Control Target (110c--1000-8000-00805f9b34fb)
UUID: Generic Attribute Profile (1801--1000-8000-00805f9b34fb)
UUID: Phonebook Access Server (112f--1000-8000-00805f9b34fb)
UUID: Audio Sink (110b--1000-8000-00805f9b34fb)
UUID: Device Information (180a--1000-8000-00805f9b34fb)
UUID: Generic Access Profile (1800--1000-8000-00805f9b34fb)
UUID: Handsfree Audio Gateway (111f--1000-8000-00805f9b34fb)
UUID: Audio Source (110a--1000-8000-00805f9b34fb)
UUID: OBEX File Transfer (1106--1000-8000-00805f9b34fb)
Modalias: usb:v1D6Bp0246d0540
Discovering: no
Roles: central
Roles: peripheral
Advertising Features:
ActiveInstances: 0x00 (0)
SupportedInstances: 0x0a (10)
SupportedIncludes: tx-power
SupportedIncludes: appearance
SupportedIncludes: local-name
SupportedSecondaryChannels: 1M
SupportedSecondaryChannels: 2M
SupportedSecondaryChannels: Coded
[bluetooth]# devices
Device 74:45:CE:BA:24:65 WH-CH710N


At this point I started the earbuds (T60) having a problem getting set up.


[CHG] Controller BC:C7:46:9D:25:98 Discoverable: yes
[CHG] Controller BC:C7:46:9D:25:98 Discovering: yes
[NEW] Device 34:95:04:4B:07:3C 34-95-04-4B-07-3C
[CHG] Device 34:95:04:4B:07:3C RSSI: -86
[NEW] Device 0B:20:24:A3:E7:56 T60
[CHG] Device 0B:20:24:A3:E7:56 RSSI: -54
[CHG] Device 0B:20:24:A3:E7:56 RSSI: -54
[CHG] Device 0B:20:24:A3:E7:56 RSSI: -54
[CHG] Device 0B:20:24:A3:E7:56 RSSI: -54
[CHG] Device 0B:20:24:A3:E7:56 RSSI: -52
[CHG] Device 0B:20:24:A3:E7:56 RSSI: -58
[CHG] Device 0B:20:24:A3:E7:56 RSSI: -56
[CHG] Device 0B:20:24:A3:E7:56 RSSI: -56
[CHG] Device 0B:20:24:A3:E7:56 RSSI: -58
[CHG] Device 0B:20:24:A3:E7:56 RSSI: -58
[CHG] Device 0B:20:24:A3:E7:56 LegacyPairing: yes
[CHG] Device 0B:20:24:A3:E7:56 RSSI: -60
[CHG] Device 0B:20:24:A3:E7:56 RSSI: -60
[CHG] Device 0B:20:24:A3:E7:56 LegacyPairing: no
[CHG] Device 0B:20:24:A3:E7:56 RSSI: -58
[CHG] Device 0B:20:24:A3:E7:56 RSSI: -64
[CHG] Device 0B:20:24:A3:E7:56 RSSI: -60
[CHG] Device 0B:20:24:A3:E7:56 RSSI: -60
[CHG] Device 0B:20:24:A3:E7:56 RSSI: -60
[CHG] Device 0B:20:24:A3:E7:56 RSSI: -60
[CHG] Device 0B:20:24:A3:E7:56 RSSI: -60
[CHG] Device 0B:20:24:A3:E7:56 RSSI: -72
[CHG] Device 0B:20:24:A3:E7:56 RSSI: -72
[CHG] Device 0B:20:24:A3:E7:56 RSSI: -72
[CHG] Device 0B:20:24:A3:E7:56 RSSI: -72
[CHG] Device 0B:20:24:A3:E7:56 RSSI: -72
[CHG] Device 0B:20:24:A3:E7:56 RSSI: -48
[CHG] Device 0B:20:24:A3:E7:56 RSSI: -48
[CHG] Device 0B:20:24:A3:E7:56 LegacyPairing: yes
[CHG] Device 0B:20:24:A3:E7:56 RSSI: -48
[CHG] Device 0B:20:24:A3:E7:56 LegacyPairing: no
[CHG] Device 0B:20:24:A3:E7:56 RSSI: -50
[CHG] Device 0B:20:24:A3:E7:56 RSSI: -50
[CHG] Device 0B:20:24:A3:E7:56 RSSI: -80
[CHG] Device 0B:20:24:A3:E7:56 RSSI: -72
[CHG] Device 0B:20:24:A3:E7:56 RSSI: -72
[CHG] Device 0B:20:24:A3:E7:56 RSSI: -72
[CHG] Device 0B:20:24:A3:E7:56 RSSI: -46
[bluetooth]# info 0B:20:24:A3:E7:56
Device 0B:20:24:A3:E7:56 (public)
Name: T60
Alias: T60
Class: 0x00240404
Icon: audio-headset
Paired: no
Trusted: no
Blocked: no
Connected: no
LegacyPairing: no
ManufacturerData Key: 0x7262

[Touch-packages] [Bug 2058249] Re: US symlinks missing in /usr/share/zoneinfo -> now in tzdata-legacy

2024-03-18 Thread Bill Evans
I see it now within `/usr/share/doc/tzdata/changelog.Debian.gz`, that's
a file I did not check. Thank you!

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to tzdata in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2058249

Title:
  US symlinks missing in /usr/share/zoneinfo -> now in tzdata-legacy

Status in tzdata package in Ubuntu:
  Invalid

Bug description:
  On 22.04 Jammy with tzdata version 2024a-0ubuntu0.22.04 installed, we
  have `/usr/share/zoneinfo/US/*` symlinks. On 23.10 Mantic with tzdata
  version 2024a-0ubuntu0.23.10, we do not. Is this an intentional
  removal? I don't follow the IANA mailing lists, but I had
  thought/assumed that "Country/Region" symlinks were being maintained
  for backward compatibility.

  Many tools I use reference multiple timezones (regardless of the
  system TZ), so it is necessary to have them available. As a temporary
  workaround, we can make the symlinks manually.

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/tzdata/+bug/2058249/+subscriptions


-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
Post to : touch-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


[Touch-packages] [Bug 2058249] Re: US symlinks missing in /usr/share/zoneinfo -> now in tzdata-legacy

2024-03-18 Thread Bill Evans
Thank you, that certainly resolves the missing files.

While I understand the reason behind the switch, I can't find where the
"intentional change" is communicated. There is no `apt changelog
tzdata`, and nothing else I see gives me a hint that the package was
split in that way. While it may not impact everybody like it did me, is
there some way to formally communicate this, perhaps within the package
description for `tzdata`?

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to tzdata in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2058249

Title:
  US symlinks missing in /usr/share/zoneinfo -> now in tzdata-legacy

Status in tzdata package in Ubuntu:
  Invalid

Bug description:
  On 22.04 Jammy with tzdata version 2024a-0ubuntu0.22.04 installed, we
  have `/usr/share/zoneinfo/US/*` symlinks. On 23.10 Mantic with tzdata
  version 2024a-0ubuntu0.23.10, we do not. Is this an intentional
  removal? I don't follow the IANA mailing lists, but I had
  thought/assumed that "Country/Region" symlinks were being maintained
  for backward compatibility.

  Many tools I use reference multiple timezones (regardless of the
  system TZ), so it is necessary to have them available. As a temporary
  workaround, we can make the symlinks manually.

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/tzdata/+bug/2058249/+subscriptions


-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
Post to : touch-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


[Touch-packages] [Bug 2058249] [NEW] US symlinks missing in /usr/share/zoneinfo

2024-03-18 Thread Bill Evans
Public bug reported:

On 22.04 Jammy with tzdata version 2024a-0ubuntu0.22.04 installed, we
have `/usr/share/zoneinfo/US/*` symlinks. On 23.10 Mantic with tzdata
version 2024a-0ubuntu0.23.10, we do not. Is this an intentional removal?
I don't follow the IANA mailing lists, but I had thought/assumed that
"Country/Region" symlinks were being maintained for backward
compatibility.

Many tools I use reference multiple timezones (regardless of the system
TZ), so it is necessary to have them available. As a temporary
workaround, we can make the symlinks manually.

** Affects: tzdata (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to tzdata in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2058249

Title:
  US symlinks missing in /usr/share/zoneinfo

Status in tzdata package in Ubuntu:
  New

Bug description:
  On 22.04 Jammy with tzdata version 2024a-0ubuntu0.22.04 installed, we
  have `/usr/share/zoneinfo/US/*` symlinks. On 23.10 Mantic with tzdata
  version 2024a-0ubuntu0.23.10, we do not. Is this an intentional
  removal? I don't follow the IANA mailing lists, but I had
  thought/assumed that "Country/Region" symlinks were being maintained
  for backward compatibility.

  Many tools I use reference multiple timezones (regardless of the
  system TZ), so it is necessary to have them available. As a temporary
  workaround, we can make the symlinks manually.

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/tzdata/+bug/2058249/+subscriptions


-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
Post to : touch-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


[Touch-packages] [Bug 2047314] Re: tzdata 2023d release (leap-second.list expiring this week)

2024-01-06 Thread Bill Thorsteinson
I have installed the proposed release and the file
/usr/share/zoneinfo/leap-seconds.list expiry date is '28 June 2024'.  A
future update should be schedule for May.   Thanks for the update.

Test regressions may be related to this change in 2023a data set. If so
test should be updated accordingly.

Changes to past timestamps

 America/Yellowknife has changed from a Zone to a backward
 compatibility Link, as it no longer differs from America/Edmonton
 since 1970.  (Thanks to Almaz Mingaleev.)  This affects some
 pre-1948 timestamps.  The old data are now in 'backzone'.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to tzdata in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2047314

Title:
  tzdata 2023d release (leap-second.list expiring this week)

Status in tzdata package in Ubuntu:
  Fix Released
Status in tzdata source package in Focal:
  Fix Committed
Status in tzdata source package in Jammy:
  Fix Committed
Status in tzdata source package in Lunar:
  Fix Committed
Status in tzdata source package in Mantic:
  Fix Committed

Bug description:
  [ Impact ]

  leap-seconds.list shipped by tzdata 2023c expired on Dec 28th 2023.

  The 2023d release contains the following changes:

     Briefly:
   Ittoqqortoormiit, Greenland changes time zones on 2024-03-31.
   Vostok, Antarctica changed time zones on 2023-12-18.
   Casey, Antarctica changed time zones five times since 2020.
   Code and data fixes for Palestine timestamps starting in 2072.
   A new data file zonenow.tab for timestamps starting now.

     Changes to future timestamps

   Ittoqqortoormiit, Greenland (America/Scoresbysund) joins most of
   the rest of Greenland's timekeeping practice on 2024-03-31, by
   changing its time zone from -01/+00 to -02/-01 at the same moment
   as the spring-forward transition.  Its clocks will therefore not
   spring forward as previously scheduled.  The time zone change
   reverts to its common practice before 1981.

   Fix predictions for DST transitions in Palestine in 2072-2075,
   correcting a typo introduced in 2023a.

     Changes to past and future timestamps

   Vostok, Antarctica changed to +05 on 2023-12-18.  It had been at
   +07 (not +06) for years.  (Thanks to Zakhary V. Akulov.)

   Change data for Casey, Antarctica to agree with timeanddate.com,
   by adding five time zone changes since 2020.  Casey is now at +08
   instead of +11.

     Changes to past tm_isdst flags

   Much of Greenland, represented by America/Nuuk, changed its
   standard time from -03 to -02 on 2023-03-25, not on 2023-10-28.
   This does not affect UTC offsets, only the tm_isdst flag.
   (Thanks to Thomas M. Steenholdt.)

     New data file

   A new data file zonenow.tab helps configure applications that use
   timestamps dated from now on.  This simplifies configuration,
   since users choose from a smaller Zone set.  The file's format is
   experimental and subject to change.

  [ Test Plan ]

  Test cases were added to autopkgtest to cover the testing:

  * python: test_2023d

  So the test plan is to check that all autopkgtest succeeds.

  [ Other Info ]

  The autopkgtest for chrony is flaky on jammy and newer (see bug
  #2002910).

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/tzdata/+bug/2047314/+subscriptions


-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
Post to : touch-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


[Touch-packages] [Bug 2047314] [NEW] leap-second.list expiring this week

2023-12-24 Thread Bill Thorsteinson
Public bug reported:

It appears the tzdata package has not been updated with the 2023d
timezone data.  Current distribution is 2023c.

leap-seconds.list is expiring Dec 28th 2023,

My fix was to download and extract https://data.iana.org/time-
zones/releases/tzdata2023d.tar.gz.  Then copy the included leap-
seconds.list and leapseconds files to /usr/share/zoneinfo.

** Affects: tzdata (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to tzdata in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2047314

Title:
  leap-second.list expiring this week

Status in tzdata package in Ubuntu:
  New

Bug description:
  It appears the tzdata package has not been updated with the 2023d
  timezone data.  Current distribution is 2023c.

  leap-seconds.list is expiring Dec 28th 2023,

  My fix was to download and extract https://data.iana.org/time-
  zones/releases/tzdata2023d.tar.gz.  Then copy the included leap-
  seconds.list and leapseconds files to /usr/share/zoneinfo.

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/tzdata/+bug/2047314/+subscriptions


-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
Post to : touch-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


[Touch-packages] [Bug 2039357] [NEW] Bluetooth headphones not detected properly

2023-10-14 Thread Bill Gradwohl
Public bug reported:

On a fresh system boot, stereo Bluetooth headphones with a microphone
that identify as WH-CH710N connect but provide no sound until Settings
is used to pick the only microphone option, the headphones, whereupon
sound immediately works.

Thereafter, doing a sound Test reveals the headphones are considered
mono, not stereo.

Sound works, but periodically the Bluetooth connection halts the browser
that's playing the sound and in about 10 seconds, Bluetooth disconnects
then reconnects a short time later but with the original sound problem.

The issue is with the Bluetooth detection. The symptom is no sound.

ProblemType: Bug
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 22.04
Package: alsa-base 1.0.25+dfsg-0ubuntu7
ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 5.15.0-86.96-generic 5.15.122
Uname: Linux 5.15.0-86-generic x86_64
ApportVersion: 2.20.11-0ubuntu82.5
Architecture: amd64
AudioDevicesInUse:
 USERPID ACCESS COMMAND
 /dev/snd/controlC0:  bill   1876 F pulseaudio
CasperMD5CheckResult: unknown
CurrentDesktop: GNOME
Date: Sat Oct 14 08:38:00 2023
InstallationDate: Installed on 2019-11-18 (1425 days ago)
InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 18.04.3 LTS "Bionic Beaver" - Release amd64 (20190805)
PackageArchitecture: all
SourcePackage: alsa-driver
Symptom: audio
Title: Bluetooth sound card not detected
UpgradeStatus: Upgraded to jammy on 2022-11-01 (346 days ago)
dmi.bios.date: 09/21/2018
dmi.bios.release: 5.13
dmi.bios.vendor: American Megatrends Inc.
dmi.bios.version: 0805
dmi.board.asset.tag: Default string
dmi.board.name: ROG STRIX Z390-I GAMING
dmi.board.vendor: ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC.
dmi.board.version: Rev X.0x
dmi.chassis.asset.tag: Default string
dmi.chassis.type: 3
dmi.chassis.vendor: Default string
dmi.chassis.version: Default string
dmi.modalias: 
dmi:bvnAmericanMegatrendsInc.:bvr0805:bd09/21/2018:br5.13:svnSystemmanufacturer:pnSystemProductName:pvrSystemVersion:rvnASUSTeKCOMPUTERINC.:rnROGSTRIXZ390-IGAMING:rvrRevX.0x:cvnDefaultstring:ct3:cvrDefaultstring:skuASUS_MB_CNL:
dmi.product.family: To be filled by O.E.M.
dmi.product.name: System Product Name
dmi.product.sku: ASUS_MB_CNL
dmi.product.version: System Version
dmi.sys.vendor: System manufacturer

** Affects: alsa-driver (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New


** Tags: amd64 apport-bug jammy

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to alsa-driver in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2039357

Title:
  Bluetooth headphones not detected properly

Status in alsa-driver package in Ubuntu:
  New

Bug description:
  On a fresh system boot, stereo Bluetooth headphones with a microphone
  that identify as WH-CH710N connect but provide no sound until Settings
  is used to pick the only microphone option, the headphones, whereupon
  sound immediately works.

  Thereafter, doing a sound Test reveals the headphones are considered
  mono, not stereo.

  Sound works, but periodically the Bluetooth connection halts the
  browser that's playing the sound and in about 10 seconds, Bluetooth
  disconnects then reconnects a short time later but with the original
  sound problem.

  The issue is with the Bluetooth detection. The symptom is no sound.

  ProblemType: Bug
  DistroRelease: Ubuntu 22.04
  Package: alsa-base 1.0.25+dfsg-0ubuntu7
  ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 5.15.0-86.96-generic 5.15.122
  Uname: Linux 5.15.0-86-generic x86_64
  ApportVersion: 2.20.11-0ubuntu82.5
  Architecture: amd64
  AudioDevicesInUse:
   USERPID ACCESS COMMAND
   /dev/snd/controlC0:  bill   1876 F pulseaudio
  CasperMD5CheckResult: unknown
  CurrentDesktop: GNOME
  Date: Sat Oct 14 08:38:00 2023
  InstallationDate: Installed on 2019-11-18 (1425 days ago)
  InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 18.04.3 LTS "Bionic Beaver" - Release amd64 
(20190805)
  PackageArchitecture: all
  SourcePackage: alsa-driver
  Symptom: audio
  Title: Bluetooth sound card not detected
  UpgradeStatus: Upgraded to jammy on 2022-11-01 (346 days ago)
  dmi.bios.date: 09/21/2018
  dmi.bios.release: 5.13
  dmi.bios.vendor: American Megatrends Inc.
  dmi.bios.version: 0805
  dmi.board.asset.tag: Default string
  dmi.board.name: ROG STRIX Z390-I GAMING
  dmi.board.vendor: ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC.
  dmi.board.version: Rev X.0x
  dmi.chassis.asset.tag: Default string
  dmi.chassis.type: 3
  dmi.chassis.vendor: Default string
  dmi.chassis.version: Default string
  dmi.modalias: 
dmi:bvnAmericanMegatrendsInc.:bvr0805:bd09/21/2018:br5.13:svnSystemmanufacturer:pnSystemProductName:pvrSystemVersion:rvnASUSTeKCOMPUTERINC.:rnROGSTRIXZ390-IGAMING:rvrRevX.0x:cvnDefaultstring:ct3:cvrDefaultstring:skuASUS_MB_CNL:
  dmi.product.family: To be filled by O.E.M.
  dmi.product.name: System Product Name
  dmi.product.sku: ASUS_MB_CNL
  dmi.product.version: System Version
  dmi.sys.vendor: System manufacturer

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/alsa-driver/+bug/20

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1916931] Re: omshell returns inconsistent results or segfaults

2023-01-18 Thread Bill MacAllister
Apologies for the poorly wrapped response.

I pulled down the isc-dhcp source package from Kinetic and built it for
Jammy.  In my initial test showed that this does indeed seem to fix the
problem.

There was an issue with 'gbp buildpackage' deleting some files in the
source repository that caused the initial build to fail:

deleted:config.guess
deleted:config.sub
deleted:keama/tests/samples/example.conf.orig
deleted:keama/tests/samples/test-a6.conf.orig
deleted:keama/tests/samples/vmnet8.conf.orig

I just 'git commit'ed the deletions and the package built successfully.

Bill

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to isc-dhcp in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1916931

Title:
  omshell returns inconsistent results or segfaults

Status in isc-dhcp package in Ubuntu:
  Expired

Bug description:
  I have just built a Ubuntu 20.04 server and installed isc-dhcp-server
  4.4.1 on it and I am seeing inconsistent returns from omshell. 
  Initially omshell returns data as expected, but when I exit and re-enter 
  omshell connections fail.

  Here is the initial, working, session:

  # omshell
  > server localhost
  > port 7911
  > key omapi_key 
  > connect
  obj: 
  > new failover-state
  obj: failover-state
  > set name = "dhcp-failover"
  obj: failover-state
  name = "dhcp-failover"
  > open
  obj: failover-state
  name = "dhcp-failover"
  partner-address = c0:9d:e9:76:e9:55:00:00
  partner-port = 00:00:02:07
  local-address = 10:9d:e9:76:e9:55:00:00
  local-port = 00:00:02:07
  max-outstanding-updates = 00:00:00:0a
  mclt = 00:00:01:2c
  load-balance-max-secs = 00:00:00:03
  load-balance-hba =
  
ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:00:00:00:00:00:00:00:00:00:00:00:00:00:00:00:00
  partner-state = 00:00:00:02
  local-state = 00:00:00:02
  partner-stos = 60:36:d0:68
  local-stos = 60:36:8b:3b
  hierarchy = 00:00:00:01
  last-packet-sent = 00:00:00:00
  last-timestamp-received = 00:00:00:00
  skew = 00:00:00:00
  max-response-delay = 00:00:00:3c
  cur-unacked-updates = 00:00:00:00

  Here is what I see when the connect fails.  Well, just hangs really.

  # omshell
  > server localhost
  > port 7911
  > key omapi_key 
  > connect

  And then I hit ctrl-c to break out and tried again:

  # omshell
  > server localhost
  > port 7911
  > key omapi_key 
  > connect
  Segmentation fault (core dumped)

  Note, the peer to this server is still running Ubuntu 18.04 with
  isc-dhcp-server 4.3.5.  Running the exact same commands on the peer
  works reliably.  (They are using the same python script to drive
  omshell.)  The DHCP server on the new system appears to be working 
  just fine as reported by omshell on the peer and systemctl.

  I was curious if the problem could be with the mis-matched versions
  of isc-dhcp-server so I shutdown isc-dhcp-server on the 18.04 system
  and get the same results.

  I also tried using a python script with the pypureomapi module to
  try and determine if the problem was in omshell or the server.  I 
  got very similar results when I attempted to get information about
  the failover state of the server.  Interestingly interrogating
  the server about host information seems to work just fine.

  This is a critical bug since I don't see how to fail over a DHCP
  that is running the isc-dhcp-server on 20.04 without being able
  to issue omapi commands.

  I am attaching apport output to this bug report.

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/isc-dhcp/+bug/1916931/+subscriptions


-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
Post to : touch-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


[Touch-packages] [Bug 1916931] Re: omshell returns inconsistent results or segfaults

2023-01-17 Thread Bill MacAllister
> Bill, Lukas asked a question in comment #10 and set the bug to 'incomplete', 
> hoping 
> to get feedback from someone who could reproduce the problem. If you can 
> provide an 
> answer, please do set the bug back to 'confirmed' when answering.

I don't agree with Lukas' action.  The bug is still valid for Jammy, the LTS 
version.
If Lukas wants to provide a package to test on Jammy I can do that, but setting 
up 
a DHCP peer environment in a version of Ubuntu that I don't have a build 
environment 
for will take quite a bit of effort.  It is particularly onerous because I only 
use 
LTS versions of Ubuntu, so even if the Kinetic works it doesn't solve my problem
for another 2 years.

> Could somebody confirm if this issue is still happening with omshell v4.4.3 
> from 
> the Ubuntu Kinetic package?

I suppose there is an alternative.  I'll see if I can backport the 4.4.3 
version from
Kinetic to Jammy.

I can confirm that the bug exists in 4.4.1 on Debian 11, Bullseye.

Bill

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to isc-dhcp in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1916931

Title:
  omshell returns inconsistent results or segfaults

Status in isc-dhcp package in Ubuntu:
  Expired

Bug description:
  I have just built a Ubuntu 20.04 server and installed isc-dhcp-server
  4.4.1 on it and I am seeing inconsistent returns from omshell. 
  Initially omshell returns data as expected, but when I exit and re-enter 
  omshell connections fail.

  Here is the initial, working, session:

  # omshell
  > server localhost
  > port 7911
  > key omapi_key 
  > connect
  obj: 
  > new failover-state
  obj: failover-state
  > set name = "dhcp-failover"
  obj: failover-state
  name = "dhcp-failover"
  > open
  obj: failover-state
  name = "dhcp-failover"
  partner-address = c0:9d:e9:76:e9:55:00:00
  partner-port = 00:00:02:07
  local-address = 10:9d:e9:76:e9:55:00:00
  local-port = 00:00:02:07
  max-outstanding-updates = 00:00:00:0a
  mclt = 00:00:01:2c
  load-balance-max-secs = 00:00:00:03
  load-balance-hba =
  
ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:00:00:00:00:00:00:00:00:00:00:00:00:00:00:00:00
  partner-state = 00:00:00:02
  local-state = 00:00:00:02
  partner-stos = 60:36:d0:68
  local-stos = 60:36:8b:3b
  hierarchy = 00:00:00:01
  last-packet-sent = 00:00:00:00
  last-timestamp-received = 00:00:00:00
  skew = 00:00:00:00
  max-response-delay = 00:00:00:3c
  cur-unacked-updates = 00:00:00:00

  Here is what I see when the connect fails.  Well, just hangs really.

  # omshell
  > server localhost
  > port 7911
  > key omapi_key 
  > connect

  And then I hit ctrl-c to break out and tried again:

  # omshell
  > server localhost
  > port 7911
  > key omapi_key 
  > connect
  Segmentation fault (core dumped)

  Note, the peer to this server is still running Ubuntu 18.04 with
  isc-dhcp-server 4.3.5.  Running the exact same commands on the peer
  works reliably.  (They are using the same python script to drive
  omshell.)  The DHCP server on the new system appears to be working 
  just fine as reported by omshell on the peer and systemctl.

  I was curious if the problem could be with the mis-matched versions
  of isc-dhcp-server so I shutdown isc-dhcp-server on the 18.04 system
  and get the same results.

  I also tried using a python script with the pypureomapi module to
  try and determine if the problem was in omshell or the server.  I 
  got very similar results when I attempted to get information about
  the failover state of the server.  Interestingly interrogating
  the server about host information seems to work just fine.

  This is a critical bug since I don't see how to fail over a DHCP
  that is running the isc-dhcp-server on 20.04 without being able
  to issue omapi commands.

  I am attaching apport output to this bug report.

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/isc-dhcp/+bug/1916931/+subscriptions


-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
Post to : touch-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


[Touch-packages] [Bug 1916931] Re: omshell returns inconsistent results or segfaults

2023-01-02 Thread Bill MacAllister
Hmm, why would an unresolved bug be expired?  The problem has been
confirmed by more than one of us.  I just finished tested with 22.04 and
can report that the problem persists.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to isc-dhcp in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1916931

Title:
  omshell returns inconsistent results or segfaults

Status in isc-dhcp package in Ubuntu:
  Expired

Bug description:
  I have just built a Ubuntu 20.04 server and installed isc-dhcp-server
  4.4.1 on it and I am seeing inconsistent returns from omshell. 
  Initially omshell returns data as expected, but when I exit and re-enter 
  omshell connections fail.

  Here is the initial, working, session:

  # omshell
  > server localhost
  > port 7911
  > key omapi_key 
  > connect
  obj: 
  > new failover-state
  obj: failover-state
  > set name = "dhcp-failover"
  obj: failover-state
  name = "dhcp-failover"
  > open
  obj: failover-state
  name = "dhcp-failover"
  partner-address = c0:9d:e9:76:e9:55:00:00
  partner-port = 00:00:02:07
  local-address = 10:9d:e9:76:e9:55:00:00
  local-port = 00:00:02:07
  max-outstanding-updates = 00:00:00:0a
  mclt = 00:00:01:2c
  load-balance-max-secs = 00:00:00:03
  load-balance-hba =
  
ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:00:00:00:00:00:00:00:00:00:00:00:00:00:00:00:00
  partner-state = 00:00:00:02
  local-state = 00:00:00:02
  partner-stos = 60:36:d0:68
  local-stos = 60:36:8b:3b
  hierarchy = 00:00:00:01
  last-packet-sent = 00:00:00:00
  last-timestamp-received = 00:00:00:00
  skew = 00:00:00:00
  max-response-delay = 00:00:00:3c
  cur-unacked-updates = 00:00:00:00

  Here is what I see when the connect fails.  Well, just hangs really.

  # omshell
  > server localhost
  > port 7911
  > key omapi_key 
  > connect

  And then I hit ctrl-c to break out and tried again:

  # omshell
  > server localhost
  > port 7911
  > key omapi_key 
  > connect
  Segmentation fault (core dumped)

  Note, the peer to this server is still running Ubuntu 18.04 with
  isc-dhcp-server 4.3.5.  Running the exact same commands on the peer
  works reliably.  (They are using the same python script to drive
  omshell.)  The DHCP server on the new system appears to be working 
  just fine as reported by omshell on the peer and systemctl.

  I was curious if the problem could be with the mis-matched versions
  of isc-dhcp-server so I shutdown isc-dhcp-server on the 18.04 system
  and get the same results.

  I also tried using a python script with the pypureomapi module to
  try and determine if the problem was in omshell or the server.  I 
  got very similar results when I attempted to get information about
  the failover state of the server.  Interestingly interrogating
  the server about host information seems to work just fine.

  This is a critical bug since I don't see how to fail over a DHCP
  that is running the isc-dhcp-server on 20.04 without being able
  to issue omapi commands.

  I am attaching apport output to this bug report.

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/isc-dhcp/+bug/1916931/+subscriptions


-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
Post to : touch-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


[Touch-packages] [Bug 2000024] [NEW] Font alignment/search bar size issue when using scaling factor > 1

2022-12-18 Thread Bill Gan
Public bug reported:

When using 'gsettings set org.gnome.desktop.interface text-scaling-
factor' command to set the scaling factor to something greater than 1,
the text gets misaligned in the search bar, which seems to be too small
(shown in an attachment here).

ProblemType: Bug
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 22.04
Package: xorg 1:7.7+23ubuntu2
ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 5.15.0-56.62-generic 5.15.64
Uname: Linux 5.15.0-56-generic x86_64
NonfreeKernelModules: nvidia_modeset nvidia
.proc.driver.nvidia.capabilities.gpu0: Error: path was not a regular file.
.proc.driver.nvidia.capabilities.mig: Error: path was not a regular file.
.proc.driver.nvidia.gpus..01.00.0: Error: path was not a regular file.
.proc.driver.nvidia.registry: Binary: ""
.proc.driver.nvidia.suspend: suspend hibernate resume
.proc.driver.nvidia.suspend_depth: default modeset uvm
.proc.driver.nvidia.version:
 NVRM version: NVIDIA UNIX x86_64 Kernel Module  525.60.11  Wed Nov 23 23:04:03 
UTC 2022
 GCC version:
ApportVersion: 2.20.11-0ubuntu82.3
Architecture: amd64
BootLog: Error: [Errno 13] Permission denied: '/var/log/boot.log'
CasperMD5CheckResult: pass
CompositorRunning: None
CurrentDesktop: ubuntu:GNOME
Date: Sun Dec 18 18:07:13 2022
DistUpgraded: Fresh install
DistroCodename: jammy
DistroVariant: ubuntu
ExtraDebuggingInterest: Yes, if not too technical
GraphicsCard:
 NVIDIA Corporation GA102 [GeForce RTX 3090] [10de:2204] (rev a1) (prog-if 00 
[VGA controller])
   Subsystem: ASUSTeK Computer Inc. GA102 [GeForce RTX 3090] [1043:87b3]
InstallationDate: Installed on 2022-12-18 (0 days ago)
InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 22.04.1 LTS "Jammy Jellyfish" - Release amd64 
(20220809.1)
MachineType: ASUS System Product Name
ProcKernelCmdLine: BOOT_IMAGE=/boot/vmlinuz-5.15.0-56-generic 
root=UUID=fc0c0197-bcc1-4eb2-abf4-af87b54ca0e2 ro quiet splash vt.handoff=7
SourcePackage: xorg
UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install)
dmi.bios.date: 11/30/2022
dmi.bios.release: 22.4
dmi.bios.vendor: American Megatrends Inc.
dmi.bios.version: 2204
dmi.board.asset.tag: Default string
dmi.board.name: ROG STRIX Z690-E GAMING WIFI
dmi.board.vendor: ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC.
dmi.board.version: Rev 1.xx
dmi.chassis.asset.tag: Default string
dmi.chassis.type: 3
dmi.chassis.vendor: Default string
dmi.chassis.version: Default string
dmi.modalias: 
dmi:bvnAmericanMegatrendsInc.:bvr2204:bd11/30/2022:br22.4:svnASUS:pnSystemProductName:pvrSystemVersion:rvnASUSTeKCOMPUTERINC.:rnROGSTRIXZ690-EGAMINGWIFI:rvrRev1.xx:cvnDefaultstring:ct3:cvrDefaultstring:skuSKU:
dmi.product.family: To be filled by O.E.M.
dmi.product.name: System Product Name
dmi.product.sku: SKU
dmi.product.version: System Version
dmi.sys.vendor: ASUS
version.compiz: compiz N/A
version.libdrm2: libdrm2 2.4.110-1ubuntu1
version.libgl1-mesa-dri: libgl1-mesa-dri 22.0.5-0ubuntu0.1
version.libgl1-mesa-glx: libgl1-mesa-glx N/A
version.nvidia-graphics-drivers: nvidia-graphics-drivers-* N/A
version.xserver-xorg-core: xserver-xorg-core 2:21.1.3-2ubuntu2.5
version.xserver-xorg-input-evdev: xserver-xorg-input-evdev N/A
version.xserver-xorg-video-ati: xserver-xorg-video-ati 1:19.1.0-2ubuntu1
version.xserver-xorg-video-intel: xserver-xorg-video-intel 
2:2.99.917+git20210115-1
version.xserver-xorg-video-nouveau: xserver-xorg-video-nouveau 1:1.0.17-2build1

** Affects: xorg (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New


** Tags: amd64 apport-bug jammy ubuntu

** Attachment added: "font alignment issue"
   
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/224/+attachment/5636288/+files/Screenshot%20from%202022-12-18%2018-10-45.png

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to xorg in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/224

Title:
  Font alignment/search bar size issue when using scaling factor > 1

Status in xorg package in Ubuntu:
  New

Bug description:
  When using 'gsettings set org.gnome.desktop.interface text-scaling-
  factor' command to set the scaling factor to something greater than 1,
  the text gets misaligned in the search bar, which seems to be too
  small (shown in an attachment here).

  ProblemType: Bug
  DistroRelease: Ubuntu 22.04
  Package: xorg 1:7.7+23ubuntu2
  ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 5.15.0-56.62-generic 5.15.64
  Uname: Linux 5.15.0-56-generic x86_64
  NonfreeKernelModules: nvidia_modeset nvidia
  .proc.driver.nvidia.capabilities.gpu0: Error: path was not a regular file.
  .proc.driver.nvidia.capabilities.mig: Error: path was not a regular file.
  .proc.driver.nvidia.gpus..01.00.0: Error: path was not a regular file.
  .proc.driver.nvidia.registry: Binary: ""
  .proc.driver.nvidia.suspend: suspend hibernate resume
  .proc.driver.nvidia.suspend_depth: default modeset uvm
  .proc.driver.nvidia.version:
   NVRM version: NVIDIA UNIX x86_64 Kernel Module  525.60.11  Wed Nov 23 
23:04:03 UTC 2022
   GCC version:
  ApportVersion: 2.20.11-0ubuntu82.3
  Architecture: amd64
  BootLog: Error: [Errno 13] Permission 

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1999320] [NEW] Font alignment issue when using scaling factor > 1

2022-12-10 Thread Bill Gan
Public bug reported:

When I use a desktop interface text scaling factor of 1.5, the alignment
text in the applications menu search bar is not set properly

I have attached a screenshot showing the issue.

1)
Description:Ubuntu 22.04.1 LTS
Release:22.04
2) xorg:
  Installed: 1:7.7+23ubuntu2
  Candidate: 1:7.7+23ubuntu2
  Version table:
 *** 1:7.7+23ubuntu2 500
500 http://ca.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu jammy/main amd64 Packages
100 /var/lib/dpkg/status
3) text was centered
4) it is not centered

** Affects: xorg (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New

** Attachment added: "Screenshot from 2022-12-11 01-10-12.png"
   
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1999320/+attachment/5635299/+files/Screenshot%20from%202022-12-11%2001-10-12.png

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to xorg in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1999320

Title:
  Font alignment issue when using scaling factor > 1

Status in xorg package in Ubuntu:
  New

Bug description:
  When I use a desktop interface text scaling factor of 1.5, the
  alignment text in the applications menu search bar is not set properly

  I have attached a screenshot showing the issue.

  1)
  Description:  Ubuntu 22.04.1 LTS
  Release:  22.04
  2) xorg:
Installed: 1:7.7+23ubuntu2
Candidate: 1:7.7+23ubuntu2
Version table:
   *** 1:7.7+23ubuntu2 500
  500 http://ca.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu jammy/main amd64 Packages
  100 /var/lib/dpkg/status
  3) text was centered
  4) it is not centered

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/xorg/+bug/1999320/+subscriptions


-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
Post to : touch-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


[Touch-packages] [Bug 1987573] Re: /home on btrfs subvolume shared with / stops boot; adding nofail to fstab fixes it

2022-08-29 Thread Bill
The `journalctl -xb` output is attached.  The error is noted at time
"Aug 29 11:12:19".  I had to press Ctrl-D at the right moment during
boot so that I could get this output.  For clarity, I removed the
"nofail" to get this error again, and it is reproducible by
adding/removing "nofail".

** Attachment added: "journalctl.txt"
   
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/systemd/+bug/1987573/+attachment/5612388/+files/journalctl.txt

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to systemd in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1987573

Title:
  /home on btrfs subvolume shared with / stops boot; adding nofail to
  fstab fixes it

Status in systemd package in Ubuntu:
  Incomplete

Bug description:
  After performing `do-release-upgrade` from 20.04 to 22.04.01, the
  system failed to boot with a message of:

  Failed to mount /home
  Dependency failed for Local File Systems.

  It took some work to figure out, but adding "nofail" to the fstab line
  allowed boot to proceed, and with that, the system appears to be
  working without issue.

  Both /boot and /home are mounted from subvolumes on the same btrfs
  filesystem.  The working fstab is below:

  # /etc/fstab: static file system information.
  #
  # Use 'blkid' to print the universally unique identifier for a
  # device; this may be used with UUID= as a more robust way to name devices
  # that works even if disks are added and removed. See fstab(5).
  #
  #
  LABEL=Root  /   btrfs   defaults,subvol=@ 0   
1
  LABEL=Root  /home   btrfs   
defaults,subvol=@home,nofail 0   2
  LABEL=EscherBackup  /mnt/EscherBackup   btrfs   defaults0 
  2
  LABEL=PicassoBackup /mnt/PicassoBackup  btrfs   defaults0 
  2
  LABEL=scratch   /mnt/scratchbtrfs   defaults0 
  2
  /dev/mapper/cryptswap1 none swap sw 0 0
  /dev/mapper/cryptswap2 none swap sw 0 0

  ProblemType: Bug
  DistroRelease: Ubuntu 22.04
  Package: ubuntu-release-upgrader-core 1:22.04.13
  ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 5.15.0-46.49-generic 5.15.39
  Uname: Linux 5.15.0-46-generic x86_64
  ApportVersion: 2.20.11-0ubuntu82.1
  Architecture: amd64
  CasperMD5CheckResult: unknown
  CrashDB: ubuntu
  Date: Wed Aug 24 20:16:42 2022
  EcryptfsInUse: Yes
  PackageArchitecture: all
  ProcEnviron:
   TERM=xterm
   PATH=(custom, no user)
   XDG_RUNTIME_DIR=
   LANG=en_US.UTF-8
   SHELL=/bin/bash
  SourcePackage: ubuntu-release-upgrader
  Symptom: release-upgrade
  UpgradeStatus: Upgraded to jammy on 2022-08-24 (0 days ago)
  VarLogDistupgradeXorgFixuplog:
   INFO:root:/usr/bin/do-release-upgrade running
   INFO:root:No xorg.conf, exiting

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/systemd/+bug/1987573/+subscriptions


-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
Post to : touch-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


[Touch-packages] [Bug 1987665] Re: The "Settings" app is missing the 'Appearance' option

2022-08-25 Thread Bill Gradwohl
I tried to use ubuntu-bug to report the lock up of chrome during the
ubuntu-bug reporting process but ubuntu-bug won't allow a report on
ubuntu-bug itself.

bill@bill ~$ ubuntu-bug ubuntu-bug
dpkg-query: no packages found matching ubuntu-bug


FYI - When I attempted to report the bug this page is about the first time, the 
ubuntu-bug output on the terminal showed the following if that's any help:
bill@bill ~$ ubuntu-bug ubuntu-settings
bill@bill ~$ 
[75943:75943:0825/071203.322589:ERROR:gpu_memory_buffer_support_x11.cc(44)] 
dri3 extension not supported.
Opening in existing browser session.

You guys should use ubuntu-bug to report something and attempt to add an
attachment as I did and you might see the chrome lock up yourselves.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to ubuntu-settings in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1987665

Title:
  The "Settings" app is missing the 'Appearance' option

Status in ubuntu-settings package in Ubuntu:
  New

Bug description:
  In-situ upgraded V20.04LTS to V22.04.1LTS. Everything went fine.

  Ubuntu Forum users report they have an Appearance option in their
  Settings app; I don't.

  bill@bill ~$ apt show ubuntu-settings
  Package: ubuntu-settings
  Version: 22.04.6
  Priority: optional
  Section: x11
  Origin: Ubuntu
  Maintainer: Ubuntu Desktop Team 
  Bugs: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+filebug
  Installed-Size: 41.0 kB
  Depends: dconf-gsettings-backend | gsettings-backend, 
gnome-control-center-data, gsettings-desktop-schemas (>= 40), libglib2.0-bin 
(>= 2.53.4-3ubuntu1~)
  Task: ubuntu-desktop-minimal, ubuntu-desktop, ubuntukylin-desktop
  Download-Size: 6,508 B
  APT-Manual-Installed: no
  APT-Sources: http://hn.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu jammy/main amd64 Packages
  Description: default settings for the Ubuntu desktop
  This package contains the default settings used by Ubuntu.

  I wanted to move the DOCK from BOTTOM to LEFT and found no way to do
  that through Settings.

  I found what looks like the proper key/value pair in dconf Editor and
  changed 'BOTTOM' to 'LEFT', rebooted and it didn't change anything. I
  double checked in dconf Editor after the reboot and it says 'LEFT' but
  the dock is still at the bottom.

  BTW - this is my second attempt at trying to report this bug but
  chrome locked up the first time after I picked a .png as an
  attachment, so I'm not going to attach an image of my Settings app
  showing The 'About' along side the list of available options with
  Appearance missing from the list.

  ProblemType: Bug
  DistroRelease: Ubuntu 22.04
  Package: ubuntu-settings 22.04.6
  ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 5.15.0-46.49-generic 5.15.39
  Uname: Linux 5.15.0-46-generic x86_64
  NonfreeKernelModules: nvidia_modeset nvidia
  ApportVersion: 2.20.11-0ubuntu82.1
  Architecture: amd64
  CasperMD5CheckResult: unknown
  CurrentDesktop: GNOME
  Date: Thu Aug 25 07:33:19 2022
  InstallationDate: Installed on 2021-07-21 (399 days ago)
  InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 20.04.1 LTS "Focal Fossa" - Release amd64 (20200731)
  PackageArchitecture: all
  SourcePackage: ubuntu-settings
  UpgradeStatus: Upgraded to jammy on 2022-08-21 (3 days ago)

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-settings/+bug/1987665/+subscriptions


-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
Post to : touch-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


[Touch-packages] [Bug 1987665] Re: The "Settings" app is missing the 'Appearance' option

2022-08-25 Thread Bill Gradwohl
I tried to attach an image to this report AFTER the report was already
accepted and chrome locked up immediately after I selected a file.
That's the second lock up when selecting a file.

** Attachment added: "Settings.png"
   
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-settings/+bug/1987665/+attachment/5611652/+files/Settings.png

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to ubuntu-settings in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1987665

Title:
  The "Settings" app is missing the 'Appearance' option

Status in ubuntu-settings package in Ubuntu:
  New

Bug description:
  In-situ upgraded V20.04LTS to V22.04.1LTS. Everything went fine.

  Ubuntu Forum users report they have an Appearance option in their
  Settings app; I don't.

  bill@bill ~$ apt show ubuntu-settings
  Package: ubuntu-settings
  Version: 22.04.6
  Priority: optional
  Section: x11
  Origin: Ubuntu
  Maintainer: Ubuntu Desktop Team 
  Bugs: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+filebug
  Installed-Size: 41.0 kB
  Depends: dconf-gsettings-backend | gsettings-backend, 
gnome-control-center-data, gsettings-desktop-schemas (>= 40), libglib2.0-bin 
(>= 2.53.4-3ubuntu1~)
  Task: ubuntu-desktop-minimal, ubuntu-desktop, ubuntukylin-desktop
  Download-Size: 6,508 B
  APT-Manual-Installed: no
  APT-Sources: http://hn.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu jammy/main amd64 Packages
  Description: default settings for the Ubuntu desktop
  This package contains the default settings used by Ubuntu.

  I wanted to move the DOCK from BOTTOM to LEFT and found no way to do
  that through Settings.

  I found what looks like the proper key/value pair in dconf Editor and
  changed 'BOTTOM' to 'LEFT', rebooted and it didn't change anything. I
  double checked in dconf Editor after the reboot and it says 'LEFT' but
  the dock is still at the bottom.

  BTW - this is my second attempt at trying to report this bug but
  chrome locked up the first time after I picked a .png as an
  attachment, so I'm not going to attach an image of my Settings app
  showing The 'About' along side the list of available options with
  Appearance missing from the list.

  ProblemType: Bug
  DistroRelease: Ubuntu 22.04
  Package: ubuntu-settings 22.04.6
  ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 5.15.0-46.49-generic 5.15.39
  Uname: Linux 5.15.0-46-generic x86_64
  NonfreeKernelModules: nvidia_modeset nvidia
  ApportVersion: 2.20.11-0ubuntu82.1
  Architecture: amd64
  CasperMD5CheckResult: unknown
  CurrentDesktop: GNOME
  Date: Thu Aug 25 07:33:19 2022
  InstallationDate: Installed on 2021-07-21 (399 days ago)
  InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 20.04.1 LTS "Focal Fossa" - Release amd64 (20200731)
  PackageArchitecture: all
  SourcePackage: ubuntu-settings
  UpgradeStatus: Upgraded to jammy on 2022-08-21 (3 days ago)

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-settings/+bug/1987665/+subscriptions


-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
Post to : touch-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


[Touch-packages] [Bug 1987665] [NEW] The "Settings" app is missing the 'Appearance' option

2022-08-25 Thread Bill Gradwohl
Public bug reported:

In-situ upgraded V20.04LTS to V22.04.1LTS. Everything went fine.

Ubuntu Forum users report they have an Appearance option in their
Settings app; I don't.

bill@bill ~$ apt show ubuntu-settings
Package: ubuntu-settings
Version: 22.04.6
Priority: optional
Section: x11
Origin: Ubuntu
Maintainer: Ubuntu Desktop Team 
Bugs: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+filebug
Installed-Size: 41.0 kB
Depends: dconf-gsettings-backend | gsettings-backend, 
gnome-control-center-data, gsettings-desktop-schemas (>= 40), libglib2.0-bin 
(>= 2.53.4-3ubuntu1~)
Task: ubuntu-desktop-minimal, ubuntu-desktop, ubuntukylin-desktop
Download-Size: 6,508 B
APT-Manual-Installed: no
APT-Sources: http://hn.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu jammy/main amd64 Packages
Description: default settings for the Ubuntu desktop
This package contains the default settings used by Ubuntu.

I wanted to move the DOCK from BOTTOM to LEFT and found no way to do
that through Settings.

I found what looks like the proper key/value pair in dconf Editor and
changed 'BOTTOM' to 'LEFT', rebooted and it didn't change anything. I
double checked in dconf Editor after the reboot and it says 'LEFT' but
the dock is still at the bottom.

BTW - this is my second attempt at trying to report this bug but chrome
locked up the first time after I picked a .png as an attachment, so I'm
not going to attach an image of my Settings app showing The 'About'
along side the list of available options with Appearance missing from
the list.

ProblemType: Bug
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 22.04
Package: ubuntu-settings 22.04.6
ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 5.15.0-46.49-generic 5.15.39
Uname: Linux 5.15.0-46-generic x86_64
NonfreeKernelModules: nvidia_modeset nvidia
ApportVersion: 2.20.11-0ubuntu82.1
Architecture: amd64
CasperMD5CheckResult: unknown
CurrentDesktop: GNOME
Date: Thu Aug 25 07:33:19 2022
InstallationDate: Installed on 2021-07-21 (399 days ago)
InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 20.04.1 LTS "Focal Fossa" - Release amd64 (20200731)
PackageArchitecture: all
SourcePackage: ubuntu-settings
UpgradeStatus: Upgraded to jammy on 2022-08-21 (3 days ago)

** Affects: ubuntu-settings (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New


** Tags: amd64 apport-bug jammy

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to ubuntu-settings in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1987665

Title:
  The "Settings" app is missing the 'Appearance' option

Status in ubuntu-settings package in Ubuntu:
  New

Bug description:
  In-situ upgraded V20.04LTS to V22.04.1LTS. Everything went fine.

  Ubuntu Forum users report they have an Appearance option in their
  Settings app; I don't.

  bill@bill ~$ apt show ubuntu-settings
  Package: ubuntu-settings
  Version: 22.04.6
  Priority: optional
  Section: x11
  Origin: Ubuntu
  Maintainer: Ubuntu Desktop Team 
  Bugs: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+filebug
  Installed-Size: 41.0 kB
  Depends: dconf-gsettings-backend | gsettings-backend, 
gnome-control-center-data, gsettings-desktop-schemas (>= 40), libglib2.0-bin 
(>= 2.53.4-3ubuntu1~)
  Task: ubuntu-desktop-minimal, ubuntu-desktop, ubuntukylin-desktop
  Download-Size: 6,508 B
  APT-Manual-Installed: no
  APT-Sources: http://hn.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu jammy/main amd64 Packages
  Description: default settings for the Ubuntu desktop
  This package contains the default settings used by Ubuntu.

  I wanted to move the DOCK from BOTTOM to LEFT and found no way to do
  that through Settings.

  I found what looks like the proper key/value pair in dconf Editor and
  changed 'BOTTOM' to 'LEFT', rebooted and it didn't change anything. I
  double checked in dconf Editor after the reboot and it says 'LEFT' but
  the dock is still at the bottom.

  BTW - this is my second attempt at trying to report this bug but
  chrome locked up the first time after I picked a .png as an
  attachment, so I'm not going to attach an image of my Settings app
  showing The 'About' along side the list of available options with
  Appearance missing from the list.

  ProblemType: Bug
  DistroRelease: Ubuntu 22.04
  Package: ubuntu-settings 22.04.6
  ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 5.15.0-46.49-generic 5.15.39
  Uname: Linux 5.15.0-46-generic x86_64
  NonfreeKernelModules: nvidia_modeset nvidia
  ApportVersion: 2.20.11-0ubuntu82.1
  Architecture: amd64
  CasperMD5CheckResult: unknown
  CurrentDesktop: GNOME
  Date: Thu Aug 25 07:33:19 2022
  InstallationDate: Installed on 2021-07-21 (399 days ago)
  InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 20.04.1 LTS "Focal Fossa" - Release amd64 (20200731)
  PackageArchitecture: all
  SourcePackage: ubuntu-settings
  UpgradeStatus: Upgraded to jammy on 2022-08-21 (3 days ago)

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-settings/+bug/1987665/+subscriptions


-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
Post to : touch-packag

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1981849] Re: Xorg freeze

2022-07-15 Thread Bill Mills-Curran
One more note: While booting, my external (USB) monitor was
disconnected.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to xorg in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1981849

Title:
  Xorg freeze

Status in xorg package in Ubuntu:
  New

Bug description:
  Although I filed this against X11, this might be a kernel issue.

  I upgraded packages on 7/13/22 & rebooted today (7/15/22 -- I hadn't
  noted the "reboot required pop-up).

  After reboot, the screen was blank/black and unresponsive.  Looking at
  indicator lights, I believe that the system had booted OK.  The syslog
  supports this.

  Included in the update: 
  xserver-xorg-core:amd64 2:1.20.13-1ubuntu1~20.04.3
  linux-libc-dev:amd64 5.4.0-122.138
  linux-image-5.15.0-41-generic:amd64  5.15.0-41.44~20.04.1

  Repeated attempts to boot all ended the same -- blank unresponsive
  screen.

  I could boot in recovery mode and with the 5.13 kernel (which I'm
  running now and was used for the bug report).

  > lsb_release -a
  LSB Version:  core-11.1.0ubuntu2-noarch:security-11.1.0ubuntu2-noarch
  Distributor ID:   Ubuntu
  Description:  Ubuntu 20.04.4 LTS
  Release:  20.04
  Code> uname -a
  Linux turk 5.13.0-52-generic #59~20.04.1-Ubuntu SMP Thu Jun 16 21:21:28 UTC 
2022 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux
  name: focal

  Again, note that the problem occurred when booting to the 5.15 kernel.

  ProblemType: Bug
  DistroRelease: Ubuntu 20.04
  Package: xorg 1:7.7+19ubuntu14
  ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 5.13.0-52.59~20.04.1-generic 5.13.19
  Uname: Linux 5.13.0-52-generic x86_64
  NonfreeKernelModules: wl
  .tmp.unity_support_test.0:
   
  ApportVersion: 2.20.11-0ubuntu27.24
  Architecture: amd64
  BootLog: Error: [Errno 13] Permission denied: '/var/log/boot.log'
  CasperMD5CheckResult: skip
  CompizPlugins: No value set for 
`/apps/compiz-1/general/screen0/options/active_plugins'
  CompositorRunning: None
  CurrentDesktop: ubuntu:GNOME
  Date: Fri Jul 15 13:51:44 2022
  DistUpgraded: Fresh install
  DistroCodename: focal
  DistroVariant: ubuntu
  ExtraDebuggingInterest: Yes
  GpuHangFrequency: Continuously
  GpuHangReproducibility: Yes, I can easily reproduce it
  GpuHangStarted: Today
  GraphicsCard:
   NVIDIA Corporation GM107GLM [Quadro M2000M] [10de:13b0] (rev a2) (prog-if 00 
[VGA controller])
 Subsystem: Dell GM107GLM [Quadro M2000M] [1028:16d9]
  InstallationDate: Installed on 2021-10-28 (260 days ago)
  InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 20.04.2.0 LTS "Focal Fossa" - Release amd64 
(20210209.1)
  MachineType: Dell Inc. Precision 7510
  ProcEnviron:
   TERM=xterm-256color
   PATH=(custom, no user)
   XDG_RUNTIME_DIR=
   LANG=en_US.UTF-8
   SHELL=/bin/tcsh
  ProcKernelCmdLine: BOOT_IMAGE=/boot/vmlinuz-5.13.0-52-generic 
root=UUID=b611bb21-5970-4191-bf68-230392700099 ro quiet splash vt.handoff=7
  SourcePackage: xorg
  Symptom: display
  Title: Xorg freeze
  UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install)
  dmi.bios.date: 12/18/2021
  dmi.bios.release: 1.25
  dmi.bios.vendor: Dell Inc.
  dmi.bios.version: 1.25.3
  dmi.board.name: 0M91XC
  dmi.board.vendor: Dell Inc.
  dmi.board.version: A00
  dmi.chassis.asset.tag: 0010333
  dmi.chassis.type: 9
  dmi.chassis.vendor: Dell Inc.
  dmi.modalias: 
dmi:bvnDellInc.:bvr1.25.3:bd12/18/2021:br1.25:svnDellInc.:pnPrecision7510:pvr:rvnDellInc.:rn0M91XC:rvrA00:cvnDellInc.:ct9:cvr:sku06D9:
  dmi.product.family: Precision
  dmi.product.name: Precision 7510
  dmi.product.sku: 06D9
  dmi.sys.vendor: Dell Inc.
  version.compiz: compiz 1:0.9.14.1+20.04.20200211-0ubuntu1
  version.libdrm2: libdrm2 2.4.107-8ubuntu1~20.04.2
  version.libgl1-mesa-dri: libgl1-mesa-dri 21.2.6-0ubuntu0.1~20.04.2
  version.libgl1-mesa-glx: libgl1-mesa-glx 21.2.6-0ubuntu0.1~20.04.2
  version.xserver-xorg-core: xserver-xorg-core 2:1.20.13-1ubuntu1~20.04.3
  version.xserver-xorg-input-evdev: xserver-xorg-input-evdev 1:2.10.6-1
  version.xserver-xorg-video-ati: xserver-xorg-video-ati 1:19.1.0-1
  version.xserver-xorg-video-intel: xserver-xorg-video-intel 
2:2.99.917+git20200226-1
  version.xserver-xorg-video-nouveau: xserver-xorg-video-nouveau 1:1.0.16-1
  xserver.bootTime: Fri Jul 15 10:40:20 2022
  xserver.configfile: default
  xserver.errors:
   [drm] Failed to open DRM device for pci::01:00.0: -19
   open /dev/dri/card0: No such file or directory
   open /dev/dri/card0: No such file or directory
   Screen 0 deleted because of no matching config section.
  xserver.logfile: /var/log/Xorg.0.log
  xserver.outputs:
   
  xserver.version: 2:1.20.13-1ubuntu1~20.04.3

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/xorg/+bug/1981849/+subscriptions


-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
Post to : touch-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


[Touch-packages] [Bug 1981849] [NEW] Xorg freeze

2022-07-15 Thread Bill Mills-Curran
Public bug reported:

Although I filed this against X11, this might be a kernel issue.

I upgraded packages on 7/13/22 & rebooted today (7/15/22 -- I hadn't
noted the "reboot required pop-up).

After reboot, the screen was blank/black and unresponsive.  Looking at
indicator lights, I believe that the system had booted OK.  The syslog
supports this.

Included in the update: 
xserver-xorg-core:amd64 2:1.20.13-1ubuntu1~20.04.3
linux-libc-dev:amd64 5.4.0-122.138
linux-image-5.15.0-41-generic:amd64  5.15.0-41.44~20.04.1

Repeated attempts to boot all ended the same -- blank unresponsive
screen.

I could boot in recovery mode and with the 5.13 kernel (which I'm
running now and was used for the bug report).

> lsb_release -a
LSB Version:core-11.1.0ubuntu2-noarch:security-11.1.0ubuntu2-noarch
Distributor ID: Ubuntu
Description:Ubuntu 20.04.4 LTS
Release:20.04
Code> uname -a
Linux turk 5.13.0-52-generic #59~20.04.1-Ubuntu SMP Thu Jun 16 21:21:28 UTC 
2022 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux
name:   focal

Again, note that the problem occurred when booting to the 5.15 kernel.

ProblemType: Bug
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 20.04
Package: xorg 1:7.7+19ubuntu14
ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 5.13.0-52.59~20.04.1-generic 5.13.19
Uname: Linux 5.13.0-52-generic x86_64
NonfreeKernelModules: wl
.tmp.unity_support_test.0:
 
ApportVersion: 2.20.11-0ubuntu27.24
Architecture: amd64
BootLog: Error: [Errno 13] Permission denied: '/var/log/boot.log'
CasperMD5CheckResult: skip
CompizPlugins: No value set for 
`/apps/compiz-1/general/screen0/options/active_plugins'
CompositorRunning: None
CurrentDesktop: ubuntu:GNOME
Date: Fri Jul 15 13:51:44 2022
DistUpgraded: Fresh install
DistroCodename: focal
DistroVariant: ubuntu
ExtraDebuggingInterest: Yes
GpuHangFrequency: Continuously
GpuHangReproducibility: Yes, I can easily reproduce it
GpuHangStarted: Today
GraphicsCard:
 NVIDIA Corporation GM107GLM [Quadro M2000M] [10de:13b0] (rev a2) (prog-if 00 
[VGA controller])
   Subsystem: Dell GM107GLM [Quadro M2000M] [1028:16d9]
InstallationDate: Installed on 2021-10-28 (260 days ago)
InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 20.04.2.0 LTS "Focal Fossa" - Release amd64 
(20210209.1)
MachineType: Dell Inc. Precision 7510
ProcEnviron:
 TERM=xterm-256color
 PATH=(custom, no user)
 XDG_RUNTIME_DIR=
 LANG=en_US.UTF-8
 SHELL=/bin/tcsh
ProcKernelCmdLine: BOOT_IMAGE=/boot/vmlinuz-5.13.0-52-generic 
root=UUID=b611bb21-5970-4191-bf68-230392700099 ro quiet splash vt.handoff=7
SourcePackage: xorg
Symptom: display
Title: Xorg freeze
UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install)
dmi.bios.date: 12/18/2021
dmi.bios.release: 1.25
dmi.bios.vendor: Dell Inc.
dmi.bios.version: 1.25.3
dmi.board.name: 0M91XC
dmi.board.vendor: Dell Inc.
dmi.board.version: A00
dmi.chassis.asset.tag: 0010333
dmi.chassis.type: 9
dmi.chassis.vendor: Dell Inc.
dmi.modalias: 
dmi:bvnDellInc.:bvr1.25.3:bd12/18/2021:br1.25:svnDellInc.:pnPrecision7510:pvr:rvnDellInc.:rn0M91XC:rvrA00:cvnDellInc.:ct9:cvr:sku06D9:
dmi.product.family: Precision
dmi.product.name: Precision 7510
dmi.product.sku: 06D9
dmi.sys.vendor: Dell Inc.
version.compiz: compiz 1:0.9.14.1+20.04.20200211-0ubuntu1
version.libdrm2: libdrm2 2.4.107-8ubuntu1~20.04.2
version.libgl1-mesa-dri: libgl1-mesa-dri 21.2.6-0ubuntu0.1~20.04.2
version.libgl1-mesa-glx: libgl1-mesa-glx 21.2.6-0ubuntu0.1~20.04.2
version.xserver-xorg-core: xserver-xorg-core 2:1.20.13-1ubuntu1~20.04.3
version.xserver-xorg-input-evdev: xserver-xorg-input-evdev 1:2.10.6-1
version.xserver-xorg-video-ati: xserver-xorg-video-ati 1:19.1.0-1
version.xserver-xorg-video-intel: xserver-xorg-video-intel 
2:2.99.917+git20200226-1
version.xserver-xorg-video-nouveau: xserver-xorg-video-nouveau 1:1.0.16-1
xserver.bootTime: Fri Jul 15 10:40:20 2022
xserver.configfile: default
xserver.errors:
 [drm] Failed to open DRM device for pci::01:00.0: -19
 open /dev/dri/card0: No such file or directory
 open /dev/dri/card0: No such file or directory
 Screen 0 deleted because of no matching config section.
xserver.logfile: /var/log/Xorg.0.log
xserver.outputs:
 
xserver.version: 2:1.20.13-1ubuntu1~20.04.3

** Affects: xorg (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New


** Tags: amd64 apport-bug focal freeze ubuntu

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to xorg in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1981849

Title:
  Xorg freeze

Status in xorg package in Ubuntu:
  New

Bug description:
  Although I filed this against X11, this might be a kernel issue.

  I upgraded packages on 7/13/22 & rebooted today (7/15/22 -- I hadn't
  noted the "reboot required pop-up).

  After reboot, the screen was blank/black and unresponsive.  Looking at
  indicator lights, I believe that the system had booted OK.  The syslog
  supports this.

  Included in the update: 
  xserver-xorg-core:amd64 2:1.20.13-1ubuntu1~20.04.3
  linux-libc-dev:amd64 5.4.0-122.138
  linux-image-5.15.0-41-generic:amd64  5.15.0-41.44~20.04.1

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1955997] Re: The airplane hotkey has no function on a HP platform

2022-03-22 Thread Bill Yu
@Robie and @Lukas

Sorry for pushing. May I have your comments on this. Thank you.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to systemd in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1955997

Title:
  The airplane hotkey has no function on a HP platform

Status in OEM Priority Project:
  Triaged
Status in systemd package in Ubuntu:
  Fix Released
Status in systemd source package in Focal:
  In Progress
Status in systemd source package in Impish:
  In Progress
Status in systemd source package in Jammy:
  Fix Released

Bug description:
  [Impact]
  The airplane hokey doesn't work on HP new generation machines.

  [Test Plan]
  Press airplane hokey.

  Before the patch, nothing happens.
  After the patch, the rfkill works as expected.

  In some old HP platforms (contains Intel-HID and HPQ6001 in same
  machine), the user will aware the airplane mode toggled very quickly
  e.g. turn-on and turn-off immediately (or works good without problem,
  depends on how DM handles multiple rfkill events).

  In this case, you could check:
  1. sudo evtest
  # You probably could see 
  # ...
  # /dev/input/event8:  Intel HID events
  # ...
  # /dev/input/event11: Wireless hotkeys
  # or "HP Wireless hotkeys" depends on your kernel version

  2. try to listen these events when pressing airplane key, you will
  probably see these two events will send the keycode out.

  3. check the components own this event
  $ sudo udevadm info -a /dev/input/event11
  # ...
  # ATTRS{phys}=="hpq6001/input0"

  $ sudo udevadm info -a /dev/input/event8
  # ...
  #DRIVERS=="intel-hid"

  4. check your hwdb is affect.
  $ grep -rn "Intel HID" /lib/udev/hwdb.d/60-keyboard.hwdb
  # If you didn't see anything then it means your intel-hid is unmask.

  5. You could report a bug to your DM for dealing with two rfkill events (same 
as g-s-d[3]). Before your DM solves this issue, you could mask intel-hid as 
workaround (but it will be overwritten in next upgrade) by adding:
  ```
  evdev:name:Intel HID events:dmi:bvn*:bvr*:bd*:svnHP*:pn*:pvr*
  ```
  to /lib/udev/hwdb.d/60-keyboard.hwdb

  then
  $ systemd-hwdb update
  $ udevadm trigger

  [Where problems could occur]
  In non-gnome ubuntu, if the specific dmi contains HPQ6001, then airplane will 
not work but HP confirmed the new HP generation won't contain the HPQ6001 and 
also each DM still need to deal with multi-rfkill events because upstream 
changes[2].

  ---

  In the last year, HP mentions HP machines need to use hp-wireless
  (HPQ6001) as the rfkill source[1].

  However, HP confirms the HPQ6001 has been retired in the platforms
  since 2022.

  In the platforms after 2022, there are two sources of rkfill events 
(intel-hid, atkbd) and HP only guarantee the intel-hid works.
  Therefore, the upstream already accept the patch[2] to unmask intel-hid and 
mention this big change in the NEWS.

  This change makes the pre-2022 HP platforms meet the regression since they 
have two rfkill events (HPQ6001 and intel-hid) be triggered if pressing 
function key.
  Thus, there is a patch[3] to make sure the GNOME could deal with this case 
smoothly.
  However, the systemd change will still cause other DEs meet the regression 
(xfce, KDE, lxde, etc..).
  Backport systemd change to make HP 2022 platforms work is not the best choice 
on stable version (focal in this case).

  We still need a solution to make airplane key works on 2022 HP platforms 
(intel-hid and atkbd only).
  The potential solution from my mind that is to maintain a whitelist to unmask 
intel-hid in ubuntu-patch in focal, something like:
  ```
  evdev:name:Intel HID events:dmi:bvn*:bvr*:bd*:svnHP*:pnHPZBookFury16inchG9*:*
   KEYBOARD_KEY_8=wlan # Use hp-wireless instead
  ```
  after "KEYBOARD_KEY_8=unkown".

  [1] https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1883846
  [2] https://github.com/systemd/systemd/pull/20219
  [3] 
https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-settings-daemon/-/commit/f4dbcf3d7b0f951fe44b29229206c97b625dbfda

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/oem-priority/+bug/1955997/+subscriptions


-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
Post to : touch-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


[Touch-packages] [Bug 1955997] Re: The airplane hotkey has no function on a HP platform

2022-03-17 Thread Bill Yu
Hi Robie and Lukas,

From our understanding, the concern is only related to Jammy, not focal.
Is that OK to change to fix released on focal.
This is one of the blocking issue for Stella Magneta platform. 
We need your help to comment on this. Thank you.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to systemd in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1955997

Title:
  The airplane hotkey has no function on a HP platform

Status in OEM Priority Project:
  Triaged
Status in systemd package in Ubuntu:
  Fix Released
Status in systemd source package in Focal:
  In Progress
Status in systemd source package in Impish:
  In Progress
Status in systemd source package in Jammy:
  Fix Released

Bug description:
  [Impact]
  The airplane hokey doesn't work on HP new generation machines.

  [Test Plan]
  Press airplane hokey.

  Before the patch, nothing happens.
  After the patch, the rfkill works as expected.

  In some old HP platforms (contains Intel-HID and HPQ6001 in same
  machine), the user will aware the airplane mode toggled very quickly
  e.g. turn-on and turn-off immediately (or works good without problem,
  depends on how DM handles multiple rfkill events).

  In this case, you could check:
  1. sudo evtest
  # You probably could see 
  # ...
  # /dev/input/event8:  Intel HID events
  # ...
  # /dev/input/event11: Wireless hotkeys
  # or "HP Wireless hotkeys" depends on your kernel version

  2. try to listen these events when pressing airplane key, you will
  probably see these two events will send the keycode out.

  3. check the components own this event
  $ sudo udevadm info -a /dev/input/event11
  # ...
  # ATTRS{phys}=="hpq6001/input0"

  $ sudo udevadm info -a /dev/input/event8
  # ...
  #DRIVERS=="intel-hid"

  4. check your hwdb is affect.
  $ grep -rn "Intel HID" /lib/udev/hwdb.d/60-keyboard.hwdb
  # If you didn't see anything then it means your intel-hid is unmask.

  5. You could report a bug to your DM for dealing with two rfkill events (same 
as g-s-d[3]). Before your DM solves this issue, you could mask intel-hid as 
workaround (but it will be overwritten in next upgrade) by adding:
  ```
  evdev:name:Intel HID events:dmi:bvn*:bvr*:bd*:svnHP*:pn*:pvr*
  ```
  to /lib/udev/hwdb.d/60-keyboard.hwdb

  then
  $ systemd-hwdb update
  $ udevadm trigger

  [Where problems could occur]
  In non-gnome ubuntu, if the specific dmi contains HPQ6001, then airplane will 
not work but HP confirmed the new HP generation won't contain the HPQ6001 and 
also each DM still need to deal with multi-rfkill events because upstream 
changes[2].

  ---

  In the last year, HP mentions HP machines need to use hp-wireless
  (HPQ6001) as the rfkill source[1].

  However, HP confirms the HPQ6001 has been retired in the platforms
  since 2022.

  In the platforms after 2022, there are two sources of rkfill events 
(intel-hid, atkbd) and HP only guarantee the intel-hid works.
  Therefore, the upstream already accept the patch[2] to unmask intel-hid and 
mention this big change in the NEWS.

  This change makes the pre-2022 HP platforms meet the regression since they 
have two rfkill events (HPQ6001 and intel-hid) be triggered if pressing 
function key.
  Thus, there is a patch[3] to make sure the GNOME could deal with this case 
smoothly.
  However, the systemd change will still cause other DEs meet the regression 
(xfce, KDE, lxde, etc..).
  Backport systemd change to make HP 2022 platforms work is not the best choice 
on stable version (focal in this case).

  We still need a solution to make airplane key works on 2022 HP platforms 
(intel-hid and atkbd only).
  The potential solution from my mind that is to maintain a whitelist to unmask 
intel-hid in ubuntu-patch in focal, something like:
  ```
  evdev:name:Intel HID events:dmi:bvn*:bvr*:bd*:svnHP*:pnHPZBookFury16inchG9*:*
   KEYBOARD_KEY_8=wlan # Use hp-wireless instead
  ```
  after "KEYBOARD_KEY_8=unkown".

  [1] https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1883846
  [2] https://github.com/systemd/systemd/pull/20219
  [3] 
https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-settings-daemon/-/commit/f4dbcf3d7b0f951fe44b29229206c97b625dbfda

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/oem-priority/+bug/1955997/+subscriptions


-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
Post to : touch-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


[Touch-packages] [Bug 1955997] Re: The airplane hotkey has no function on a HP platform

2022-03-10 Thread Bill Yu
Hi Robie,

May we have your comment on this. Since we would like to have this
solution in the latest kernel, need you help to check on this. Thank
you.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to systemd in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1955997

Title:
  The airplane hotkey has no function on a HP platform

Status in OEM Priority Project:
  Triaged
Status in systemd package in Ubuntu:
  Fix Released
Status in systemd source package in Focal:
  In Progress
Status in systemd source package in Impish:
  In Progress
Status in systemd source package in Jammy:
  Fix Released

Bug description:
  [Impact]
  The airplane hokey doesn't work on HP new generation machines.

  [Test Plan]
  Press airplane hokey.

  Before the patch, nothing happens.
  After the patch, the rfkill works as expected.

  In some old HP platforms (contains Intel-HID and HPQ6001 in same
  machine), the user will aware the airplane mode toggled very quickly
  e.g. turn-on and turn-off immediately (or works good without problem,
  depends on how DM handles multiple rfkill events).

  In this case, you could check:
  1. sudo evtest
  # You probably could see 
  # ...
  # /dev/input/event8:  Intel HID events
  # ...
  # /dev/input/event11: Wireless hotkeys
  # or "HP Wireless hotkeys" depends on your kernel version

  2. try to listen these events when pressing airplane key, you will
  probably see these two events will send the keycode out.

  3. check the components own this event
  $ sudo udevadm info -a /dev/input/event11
  # ...
  # ATTRS{phys}=="hpq6001/input0"

  $ sudo udevadm info -a /dev/input/event8
  # ...
  #DRIVERS=="intel-hid"

  4. check your hwdb is affect.
  $ grep -rn "Intel HID" /lib/udev/hwdb.d/60-keyboard.hwdb
  # If you didn't see anything then it means your intel-hid is unmask.

  5. You could report a bug to your DM for dealing with two rfkill events (same 
as g-s-d[3]). Before your DM solves this issue, you could mask intel-hid as 
workaround (but it will be overwritten in next upgrade) by adding:
  ```
  evdev:name:Intel HID events:dmi:bvn*:bvr*:bd*:svnHP*:pn*:pvr*
  ```
  to /lib/udev/hwdb.d/60-keyboard.hwdb

  then
  $ systemd-hwdb update
  $ udevadm trigger

  [Where problems could occur]
  In non-gnome ubuntu, if the specific dmi contains HPQ6001, then airplane will 
not work but HP confirmed the new HP generation won't contain the HPQ6001 and 
also each DM still need to deal with multi-rfkill events because upstream 
changes[2].

  ---

  In the last year, HP mentions HP machines need to use hp-wireless
  (HPQ6001) as the rfkill source[1].

  However, HP confirms the HPQ6001 has been retired in the platforms
  since 2022.

  In the platforms after 2022, there are two sources of rkfill events 
(intel-hid, atkbd) and HP only guarantee the intel-hid works.
  Therefore, the upstream already accept the patch[2] to unmask intel-hid and 
mention this big change in the NEWS.

  This change makes the pre-2022 HP platforms meet the regression since they 
have two rfkill events (HPQ6001 and intel-hid) be triggered if pressing 
function key.
  Thus, there is a patch[3] to make sure the GNOME could deal with this case 
smoothly.
  However, the systemd change will still cause other DEs meet the regression 
(xfce, KDE, lxde, etc..).
  Backport systemd change to make HP 2022 platforms work is not the best choice 
on stable version (focal in this case).

  We still need a solution to make airplane key works on 2022 HP platforms 
(intel-hid and atkbd only).
  The potential solution from my mind that is to maintain a whitelist to unmask 
intel-hid in ubuntu-patch in focal, something like:
  ```
  evdev:name:Intel HID events:dmi:bvn*:bvr*:bd*:svnHP*:pnHPZBookFury16inchG9*:*
   KEYBOARD_KEY_8=wlan # Use hp-wireless instead
  ```
  after "KEYBOARD_KEY_8=unkown".

  [1] https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1883846
  [2] https://github.com/systemd/systemd/pull/20219
  [3] 
https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-settings-daemon/-/commit/f4dbcf3d7b0f951fe44b29229206c97b625dbfda

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/oem-priority/+bug/1955997/+subscriptions


-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
Post to : touch-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


[Touch-packages] [Bug 1946595] Re: indicator-applet-complete clock occasionally shows UTC

2021-10-10 Thread Bill Miller
Ok, but the standalone clock indicator works. The clock in "indicator
applet complete" doesn't. See https://i.stack.imgur.com/x11A4.png

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to indicator-datetime in
Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1946595

Title:
  indicator-applet-complete clock occasionally shows UTC

Status in indicator-datetime package in Ubuntu:
  New

Bug description:
  Sometimes at login, but sometimes at other times, the clock in
  indicator-applet-complete starts showing UTC instead of local.

  It is not a system clock problem, in the terminal and in the
  standalone clock applet the time is correct. See
  https://i.stack.imgur.com/x11A4.png

  ProblemType: Bug
  DistroRelease: Ubuntu 20.04
  Package: indicator-applet-complete (not installed)
  ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 5.11.0-37.41~20.04.2-generic 5.11.22
  Uname: Linux 5.11.0-37-generic x86_64
  NonfreeKernelModules: nvidia_modeset nvidia
  ApportVersion: 2.20.11-0ubuntu27.20
  Architecture: amd64
  CasperMD5CheckResult: skip
  CurrentDesktop: MATE
  Date: Sun Oct 10 08:37:00 2021
  InstallationDate: Installed on 2018-04-27 (1261 days ago)
  InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 18.04 LTS "Bionic Beaver" - Release amd64 (20180426)
  SourcePackage: indicator-applet
  UpgradeStatus: Upgraded to focal on 2021-10-03 (6 days ago)

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/indicator-datetime/+bug/1946595/+subscriptions


-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
Post to : touch-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


[Touch-packages] [Bug 1369651] Re: "libmtp error: Could not send object info" when copying content to root MTP folder

2021-08-31 Thread Bill Hayden
This happens for me on 20.04 LTS when the file being copied has a colon
(:) in its name.  The error doesn't pop up until the very end of the
file copy process, and in the end, the file is not copied to the
destination.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to mtp in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1369651

Title:
  "libmtp error: Could not send object info" when copying content to
  root MTP folder

Status in mtp package in Ubuntu:
  Confirmed

Bug description:
  ENVIRONMENT:
  Ubuntu device: ubuntu-rtm/14.09-proposed build 40
  Desktop: Ubuntu 14.10

  SUMMARY:
  "libmtp error: Could not send object info" when copying content to root MTP 
folder

  STEPS:
  1) Connect Ubuntu MTP device over USB
  2) Attempt to copy some content to the root of the MTP folder

  EXPECTED RESULT:
  The copy operation should succeed. (This is the Android behaviour).

  ACTUAL RESULT:
  An error message is presented on desktop: "libmtp error: Could not send 
object info"

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/mtp/+bug/1369651/+subscriptions


-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
Post to : touch-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


[Touch-packages] [Bug 1940691] Re: sfdisk fails to overwrite disks that contain a pre-existing linux partition

2021-08-20 Thread Bill Yikes
** Description changed:

  This command should non-interactively obliterate whatever partition
  table is on /dev/sde, and create a new table with a linux partition that
  spans the whole disk:
  
-   $ sfdisk --label gpt /dev/sde <<< 'start=2048, type='"$(sfdisk --label
+   $ sfdisk --label gpt /dev/sde <<< 'start=2048, type='"$(sfdisk --label
  gpt -T | awk '{IGNORECASE = 1;} /linux filesystem/{print $1}')"
  
  Sometimes it works correctly; sometimes not.  It seems to work correctly
  as long as the pre-existing partition table does not already contain a
  linux partition.  E.g. if the existing table just contains an exFAT
  partition, there's no issue.  But if there is a linux partition, it
  gives this output:
  
  -
  Old situation:
  
  Device StartEndSectors   Size Type
  /dev/sde1   2048 1953525134 1953523087 931.5G Linux root (x86-64)
  
  >>> Created a new GPT disklabel (GUID: ).
  /dev/sde1: Sector 2048 already used.
  Failed to add #1 partition: Numerical result out of range
  Leaving.
  -
  
  sfdisk should *always* overwrite the target disk unconditionally.  This
  is what the dump of the target drive looks like in the failure case:
  
  $ sfdisk -d /dev/sdd
  label: gpt
  label-id: 
  device: /dev/sdd
  unit: sectors
  first-lba: 34
  last-lba: 1953525134
  grain: 33553920
  sector-size: 512
  
  /dev/sdd1 : start=2048, size=  1953523087,
  type=4F68BCE3-E8CD-4DB1-96E7-FBCAF984B709, uuid=, name="Linux
  x86-64 root (/)"
  
  $ sfdisk -v
  sfdisk from util-linux 2.36.1
  
  Even the workaround is broken.  That is, running the following:
  
  $ wipefs -a /dev/sde
  
  should put the disk in a state that can be overwritten.  But whatever
  residual metadata it leaves behind still triggers the sfdisk bug:
  
  $ sfdisk --label gpt /dev/sde <<< 'start=2048, type='"$(sfdisk --label gpt -T 
| awk '{IGNORECASE = 1;} /linux filesystem/{print $1}')"
  Checking that no-one is using this disk right now ... OK
  
  Disk /dev/sde: 931.51 GiB, 1000204886016 bytes, 1953525168 sectors
- Disk model: Disk
+ Disk model: Disk
  Units: sectors of 1 * 512 = 512 bytes
  Sector size (logical/physical): 512 bytes / 512 bytes
  I/O size (minimum/optimal): 4096 bytes / 33553920 bytes
  
  >>> Created a new GPT disklabel (GUID: ).
  /dev/sde1: Sector 2048 already used.
  Failed to add #1 partition: Numerical result out of range
  Leaving.
+ 
+ Workaround 2 (also fails):
+ 
+ $ dd if=/dev/zero of=/dev/sde bs=1M count=512
+ 
+ $ sfdisk -d /dev/sde
+ sfdisk: /dev/sde: does not contain a recognized partition table
+ 
+ ^ the nuclear option did the right thing, but sfdisk still fails to
+ partition the drive (same error).
+ 
+ The *only* workaround that works is an interactive partitioning with
+ gdisk.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to util-linux in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1940691

Title:
  sfdisk fails to overwrite disks that contain a pre-existing linux
  partition

Status in util-linux package in Ubuntu:
  New

Bug description:
  This command should non-interactively obliterate whatever partition
  table is on /dev/sde, and create a new table with a linux partition
  that spans the whole disk:

    $ sfdisk --label gpt /dev/sde <<< 'start=2048, type='"$(sfdisk
  --label gpt -T | awk '{IGNORECASE = 1;} /linux filesystem/{print
  $1}')"

  Sometimes it works correctly; sometimes not.  It seems to work
  correctly as long as the pre-existing partition table does not already
  contain a linux partition.  E.g. if the existing table just contains
  an exFAT partition, there's no issue.  But if there is a linux
  partition, it gives this output:

  -
  Old situation:

  Device StartEndSectors   Size Type
  /dev/sde1   2048 1953525134 1953523087 931.5G Linux root (x86-64)

  >>> Created a new GPT disklabel (GUID: ).
  /dev/sde1: Sector 2048 already used.
  Failed to add #1 partition: Numerical result out of range
  Leaving.
  -

  sfdisk should *always* overwrite the target disk unconditionally.
  This is what the dump of the target drive looks like in the failure
  case:

  $ sfdisk -d /dev/sdd
  label: gpt
  label-id: 
  device: /dev/sdd
  unit: sectors
  first-lba: 34
  last-lba: 1953525134
  grain: 33553920
  sector-size: 512

  /dev/sdd1 : start=2048, size=  1953523087,
  type=4F68BCE3-E8CD-4DB1-96E7-FBCAF984B709, uuid=,
  name="Linux x86-64 root (/)"

  $ sfdisk -v
  sfdisk from util-linux 2.36.1

  Even the workaround is broken.  That is, running the following:

  $ wipefs -a /dev/sde

  should put the disk in a state that can be overwritten.  But whatever
  residual metadata it leaves behind still triggers the sfdisk bug:

  $ sfdisk --label gpt /dev/sde <<< 'start=2048, type='"$(sfdisk --label gpt -T 
| awk '{IGNORECASE = 1;} /linux filesystem/{print $1}')"
  Checking that no-one is using this disk right now ... OK

  Disk /dev/sde: 931.51 

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1940691] [NEW] sfdisk fails to overwrite disks that contain a pre-existing linux partition

2021-08-20 Thread Bill Yikes
Public bug reported:

This command should non-interactively obliterate whatever partition
table is on /dev/sde, and create a new table with a linux partition that
spans the whole disk:

  $ sfdisk --label gpt /dev/sde <<< 'start=2048, type='"$(sfdisk --label
gpt -T | awk '{IGNORECASE = 1;} /linux filesystem/{print $1}')"

Sometimes it works correctly; sometimes not.  It seems to work correctly
as long as the pre-existing partition table does not already contain a
linux partition.  E.g. if the existing table just contains an exFAT
partition, there's no issue.  But if there is a linux partition, it
gives this output:

-
Old situation:

Device StartEndSectors   Size Type
/dev/sde1   2048 1953525134 1953523087 931.5G Linux root (x86-64)

>>> Created a new GPT disklabel (GUID: ).
/dev/sde1: Sector 2048 already used.
Failed to add #1 partition: Numerical result out of range
Leaving.
-

sfdisk should *always* overwrite the target disk unconditionally.  This
is what the dump of the target drive looks like in the failure case:

$ sfdisk -d /dev/sdd
label: gpt
label-id: 
device: /dev/sdd
unit: sectors
first-lba: 34
last-lba: 1953525134
grain: 33553920
sector-size: 512

/dev/sdd1 : start=2048, size=  1953523087,
type=4F68BCE3-E8CD-4DB1-96E7-FBCAF984B709, uuid=, name="Linux
x86-64 root (/)"

$ sfdisk -v
sfdisk from util-linux 2.36.1

Even the workaround is broken.  That is, running the following:

$ wipefs -a /dev/sde

should put the disk in a state that can be overwritten.  But whatever
residual metadata it leaves behind still triggers the sfdisk bug:

$ sfdisk --label gpt /dev/sde <<< 'start=2048, type='"$(sfdisk --label gpt -T | 
awk '{IGNORECASE = 1;} /linux filesystem/{print $1}')"
Checking that no-one is using this disk right now ... OK

Disk /dev/sde: 931.51 GiB, 1000204886016 bytes, 1953525168 sectors
Disk model: Disk
Units: sectors of 1 * 512 = 512 bytes
Sector size (logical/physical): 512 bytes / 512 bytes
I/O size (minimum/optimal): 4096 bytes / 33553920 bytes

>>> Created a new GPT disklabel (GUID: ).
/dev/sde1: Sector 2048 already used.
Failed to add #1 partition: Numerical result out of range
Leaving.

Workaround 2 (also fails):

$ dd if=/dev/zero of=/dev/sde bs=1M count=512

$ sfdisk -d /dev/sde
sfdisk: /dev/sde: does not contain a recognized partition table

^ the nuclear option did the right thing, but sfdisk still fails to
partition the drive (same error).

The *only* workaround that works is an interactive partitioning with
gdisk.

** Affects: util-linux (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to util-linux in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1940691

Title:
  sfdisk fails to overwrite disks that contain a pre-existing linux
  partition

Status in util-linux package in Ubuntu:
  New

Bug description:
  This command should non-interactively obliterate whatever partition
  table is on /dev/sde, and create a new table with a linux partition
  that spans the whole disk:

    $ sfdisk --label gpt /dev/sde <<< 'start=2048, type='"$(sfdisk
  --label gpt -T | awk '{IGNORECASE = 1;} /linux filesystem/{print
  $1}')"

  Sometimes it works correctly; sometimes not.  It seems to work
  correctly as long as the pre-existing partition table does not already
  contain a linux partition.  E.g. if the existing table just contains
  an exFAT partition, there's no issue.  But if there is a linux
  partition, it gives this output:

  -
  Old situation:

  Device StartEndSectors   Size Type
  /dev/sde1   2048 1953525134 1953523087 931.5G Linux root (x86-64)

  >>> Created a new GPT disklabel (GUID: ).
  /dev/sde1: Sector 2048 already used.
  Failed to add #1 partition: Numerical result out of range
  Leaving.
  -

  sfdisk should *always* overwrite the target disk unconditionally.
  This is what the dump of the target drive looks like in the failure
  case:

  $ sfdisk -d /dev/sdd
  label: gpt
  label-id: 
  device: /dev/sdd
  unit: sectors
  first-lba: 34
  last-lba: 1953525134
  grain: 33553920
  sector-size: 512

  /dev/sdd1 : start=2048, size=  1953523087,
  type=4F68BCE3-E8CD-4DB1-96E7-FBCAF984B709, uuid=,
  name="Linux x86-64 root (/)"

  $ sfdisk -v
  sfdisk from util-linux 2.36.1

  Even the workaround is broken.  That is, running the following:

  $ wipefs -a /dev/sde

  should put the disk in a state that can be overwritten.  But whatever
  residual metadata it leaves behind still triggers the sfdisk bug:

  $ sfdisk --label gpt /dev/sde <<< 'start=2048, type='"$(sfdisk --label gpt -T 
| awk '{IGNORECASE = 1;} /linux filesystem/{print $1}')"
  Checking that no-one is using this disk right now ... OK

  Disk /dev/sde: 931.51 GiB, 1000204886016 bytes, 1953525168 sectors
  Disk model: Disk
  Units: sectors of 1 * 512 = 512 bytes
  Sector size (logical/physical): 512 bytes / 512 bytes
  I/O size 

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1937874] [NEW] one --accept-regex expression negates another

2021-07-23 Thread Bill Yikes
Public bug reported:

This command should theoretically fetch all PDFs on a page:

$ wget -v -d -r --level 1 --adjust-extension --no-clobber --no-directories\
   --accept-regex 'administrative-orders/.*/administrative-order-matter-'\
   --accept-regex 'administrative-orders.*.pdf'\
   --accept-regex 'administrative-orders.page[^&]*$'\
   --directory-prefix=/tmp\
   
'https://www.ncua.gov/regulation-supervision/enforcement-actions/administrative-orders?page=56'

But it fails to grab any of them, giving the output:

---
Deciding whether to enqueue 
"https://www.ncua.gov/files/administrative-orders/AO14-0241-R4.pdf;.
https://www.ncua.gov/files/administrative-orders/AO14-0241-R4.pdf is 
excluded/not-included through regex.
Decided NOT to load it.
---

That's bogus.  The workaround is to remove this option:

--accept-regex 'administrative-orders.page[^&]*$'

But that should not be necessary.  Adding an --accept-* clause should
never cause another --accept-* clause to become invalidated and it
should not shrink the set of fetched files.

** Affects: wget (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to wget in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1937874

Title:
  one --accept-regex expression negates another

Status in wget package in Ubuntu:
  New

Bug description:
  This command should theoretically fetch all PDFs on a page:

  $ wget -v -d -r --level 1 --adjust-extension --no-clobber --no-directories\
 --accept-regex 'administrative-orders/.*/administrative-order-matter-'\
 --accept-regex 'administrative-orders.*.pdf'\
 --accept-regex 'administrative-orders.page[^&]*$'\
 --directory-prefix=/tmp\
 
'https://www.ncua.gov/regulation-supervision/enforcement-actions/administrative-orders?page=56'

  But it fails to grab any of them, giving the output:

  ---
  Deciding whether to enqueue 
"https://www.ncua.gov/files/administrative-orders/AO14-0241-R4.pdf;.
  https://www.ncua.gov/files/administrative-orders/AO14-0241-R4.pdf is 
excluded/not-included through regex.
  Decided NOT to load it.
  ---

  That's bogus.  The workaround is to remove this option:

  --accept-regex 'administrative-orders.page[^&]*$'

  But that should not be necessary.  Adding an --accept-* clause should
  never cause another --accept-* clause to become invalidated and it
  should not shrink the set of fetched files.

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/wget/+bug/1937874/+subscriptions


-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
Post to : touch-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


[Touch-packages] [Bug 1937850] [NEW] the -L / --relative option breaks --accept-regex

2021-07-23 Thread Bill Yikes
Public bug reported:

This code should in principle (per the docs) fetch a few *.pdf files:

$ wget -r --level 1 --adjust-extension --relative --no-clobber --no-directories\
   --domains=ncua.gov --accept-regex 'administrative-orders/.*.pdf'\
   
'https://www.ncua.gov/regulation-supervision/enforcement-actions/administrative-orders?page=22=year=desc='

But it misses all *.pdf files.  When the --relative option is removed,
the PDF files are downloaded.  However, when you examine the tree-top
HTML file, the links pointing to PDF files actually are relative.

** Affects: wget (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to wget in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1937850

Title:
  the -L / --relative option breaks --accept-regex

Status in wget package in Ubuntu:
  New

Bug description:
  This code should in principle (per the docs) fetch a few *.pdf files:

  $ wget -r --level 1 --adjust-extension --relative --no-clobber 
--no-directories\
 --domains=ncua.gov --accept-regex 'administrative-orders/.*.pdf'\
 
'https://www.ncua.gov/regulation-supervision/enforcement-actions/administrative-orders?page=22=year=desc='

  But it misses all *.pdf files.  When the --relative option is removed,
  the PDF files are downloaded.  However, when you examine the tree-top
  HTML file, the links pointing to PDF files actually are relative.

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/wget/+bug/1937850/+subscriptions


-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
Post to : touch-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


[Touch-packages] [Bug 1937082] [NEW] gunzip fails to extract data from stdin when the zip holds multiple files

2021-07-21 Thread Bill Yikes
Public bug reported:

There is no good reason for this command to fail:

$ wget --quiet -O -
https://web.archive.org/web/20210721004028/freefontsdownload.net/download/76451/lucida_fax.zip
| gunzip -

The output is:

[InternetShortcut]
URL=HOMESITEfree-lucida_fax-font-76451.htmgzip: stdin has more than one 
entry--rest ignored

What's happening is gzip logic has gotten tangled up with the gunzip
logic. If gzip receives an input stream, it's sensible that the
resulting archive contain just one file. But there's no reason gunzip
should not be able to produce multiple files from a zip stream.  Note
that -c was not given to gunzip, so it should not have the constraints
that use of stdout would impose.

The man page is also a problem. The gunzip portion of the aggregated man
page makes no statement about how stdin is expected to operate.  At a
minimum, it should say that a minus ("-") directs gunzip to read from
stdin.

** Affects: gzip (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to gzip in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1937082

Title:
  gunzip fails to extract data from stdin when the zip holds multiple
  files

Status in gzip package in Ubuntu:
  New

Bug description:
  There is no good reason for this command to fail:

  $ wget --quiet -O -
  
https://web.archive.org/web/20210721004028/freefontsdownload.net/download/76451/lucida_fax.zip
  | gunzip -

  The output is:

  [InternetShortcut]
  URL=HOMESITEfree-lucida_fax-font-76451.htmgzip: stdin has more than one 
entry--rest ignored

  What's happening is gzip logic has gotten tangled up with the gunzip
  logic. If gzip receives an input stream, it's sensible that the
  resulting archive contain just one file. But there's no reason gunzip
  should not be able to produce multiple files from a zip stream.  Note
  that -c was not given to gunzip, so it should not have the constraints
  that use of stdout would impose.

  The man page is also a problem. The gunzip portion of the aggregated
  man page makes no statement about how stdin is expected to operate.
  At a minimum, it should say that a minus ("-") directs gunzip to read
  from stdin.

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gzip/+bug/1937082/+subscriptions


-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
Post to : touch-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


[Touch-packages] [Bug 1918970] Re: Unable to netboot Ubuntu 18.04 and older on an IBM Z DPM Partition - no manual nor automatic qeth device configuration

2021-07-06 Thread Bill Wear
** Changed in: maas
   Status: New => Triaged

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to initramfs-tools in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1918970

Title:
  Unable to netboot Ubuntu 18.04 and older on an IBM Z DPM Partition -
  no manual nor automatic qeth device configuration

Status in MAAS:
  Triaged
Status in Ubuntu on IBM z Systems:
  Triaged
Status in initramfs-tools package in Ubuntu:
  New
Status in linux package in Ubuntu:
  Incomplete
Status in s390-tools package in Ubuntu:
  New

Bug description:
  I tried to deploy Ubuntu 18.04 with the GA-18.04 kernel on an IBM Z14
  DPM Partition.  The initrd fails to bring up network and thus fails to
  boot in MAAS. I haven't tried older versions of Ubuntu but suspect
  they also have the same bug.

  mount: mounting /dev on /root/dev failed: No such file or directory
  done.
  mount: mounting /run on /root/run failed: No such file or directory
  run-init: current directory on the same filesystem as the root: error 0
  Target filesystem doesn't have requested /sbin/init.
  run-init: current directory on the same filesystem as the root: error 0
  run-init: current directory on the same filesystem as the root: error 0
  run-init: current directory on the same filesystem as the root: error 0
  run-init: current directory on the same filesystem as the root: error 0
  run-init: current directory on the same filesystem as the root: error 0
  chvt: can't open console
  No init found. Try passing init= bootarg.
  Couldn't get a file descriptor referring to the console
  /scripts/panic/console_setup: line 133: can't create /dev/tty1: No such 
device o
  r address
  /scripts/panic/console_setup: line 1: can't open /dev/tty1: No such device or 
ad
  dress
  /scripts/panic/console_setup: line 1: can't create /dev/tty2: No such device 
or
  address
  /scripts/panic/console_setup: line 1: can't open /dev/tty2: No such device or 
ad
  dress
  /scripts/panic/console_setup: line 1: can't create /dev/tty3: No such device 
or
  address
  /scripts/panic/console_setup: line 1: can't open /dev/tty3: No such device or 
ad
  dress
  /scripts/panic/console_setup: line 1: can't create /dev/tty4: No such device 
or
  address
  /scripts/panic/console_setup: line 1: can't open /dev/tty4: No such device or 
ad
  dress
  /scripts/panic/console_setup: line 1: can't create /dev/tty5: No such device 
or
  address
  /scripts/panic/console_setup: line 1: can't open /dev/tty5: No such device or 
ad
  dress
  /scripts/panic/console_setup: line 1: can't create /dev/tty6: No such device 
or
  address
  /scripts/panic/console_setup: line 1: can't open /dev/tty6: No such device or 
ad
  dress
   
   
  BusyBox v1.27.2 (Ubuntu 1:1.27.2-2ubuntu3.3) built-in shell (ash)
  Enter 'help' for a list of built-in commands.
   
  (initramfs) [6n
  [   78.114530] random: crng init done
  [   78.114538] random: 7 urandom warning(s) missed due to ratelimiting

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/maas/+bug/1918970/+subscriptions

-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
Post to : touch-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


[Touch-packages] [Bug 1934040] Re: openssl s_client's '-ssl2' & '-ssl3' options gone, prematurely!

2021-06-30 Thread Bill Yikes
** Description changed:

  SSL2 and SSL3 have been hastily removed, apparently by developers who
  are unaware that these protocols serve purposes other than encryption.
  SSL2/3 is *still used* on onion sites.  Why?  For verification.  An
  onion site has inherent encryption, so it matters not how weak the SSL
  crypto is when the purpose is purely to verify that the server is owned
  by who they say it's owned by.
  
  Proof that disclosure attacks on ssl2/3 are irrelevant to onion sites:
  
  https://blog.torproject.org/tls-certificate-for-onion-site
+ https://community.torproject.org/onion-services/overview/
  
  So here is a real world impact case.  Suppose you get your email from
  one of these onion mail servers:
  
  http://onionmail.info/directory.html
  
  Some (if not all) use ssl2/3 on top of Tor's inherent onion tunnel.
  They force users to use ssl2/3, so even if a user configures the client
  not to impose TLS, the server imposes it.  And it's reasonable because
  the ssl2/3 vulns are orthoganol to the use case.
  
  Some users will get lucky and use a mail client that still supports
  ssl2/3.  But there's still a problem: users can no longer use openssl to
  obtain the fingerprint to pin.  e.g.
  
  $ openssl s_client -proxy 127.0.0.1:8118 -connect xhfheq5i37waj6qb.onion:110 
-showcerts
  CONNECTED(0003)
  140124399195456:error:1408F10B:SSL routines:ssl3_get_record:wrong version 
number:../ssl/record/ssl3_record.c:331:
  ---
  no peer certificate available
  ---
  No client certificate CA names sent
  ---
  SSL handshake has read 44 bytes and written 330 bytes
  Verification: OK
  ---
  New, (NONE), Cipher is (NONE)
  Secure Renegotiation IS NOT supported
  Compression: NONE
  Expansion: NONE
  No ALPN negotiated
  Early data was not sent
  Verify return code: 0 (ok)
  ---
  
  That's openssl version 1.1.1k
  
  Being denied the ability to pin the SSL cert is actually a *degredation*
  of security.  Cert Pinning is particularly useful with self-signed
  certs, as is often the scenario with onion sites.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to openssl in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1934040

Title:
  openssl s_client's '-ssl2' & '-ssl3' options gone, prematurely!

Status in openssl package in Ubuntu:
  New

Bug description:
  SSL2 and SSL3 have been hastily removed, apparently by developers who
  are unaware that these protocols serve purposes other than encryption.
  SSL2/3 is *still used* on onion sites.  Why?  For verification.  An
  onion site has inherent encryption, so it matters not how weak the SSL
  crypto is when the purpose is purely to verify that the server is
  owned by who they say it's owned by.

  Proof that disclosure attacks on ssl2/3 are irrelevant to onion sites:

  https://blog.torproject.org/tls-certificate-for-onion-site
  https://community.torproject.org/onion-services/overview/

  So here is a real world impact case.  Suppose you get your email from
  one of these onion mail servers:

  http://onionmail.info/directory.html

  Some (if not all) use ssl2/3 on top of Tor's inherent onion tunnel.
  They force users to use ssl2/3, so even if a user configures the
  client not to impose TLS, the server imposes it.  And it's reasonable
  because the ssl2/3 vulns are orthoganol to the use case.

  Some users will get lucky and use a mail client that still supports
  ssl2/3.  But there's still a problem: users can no longer use openssl
  to obtain the fingerprint to pin.  e.g.

  $ openssl s_client -proxy 127.0.0.1:8118 -connect xhfheq5i37waj6qb.onion:110 
-showcerts
  CONNECTED(0003)
  140124399195456:error:1408F10B:SSL routines:ssl3_get_record:wrong version 
number:../ssl/record/ssl3_record.c:331:
  ---
  no peer certificate available
  ---
  No client certificate CA names sent
  ---
  SSL handshake has read 44 bytes and written 330 bytes
  Verification: OK
  ---
  New, (NONE), Cipher is (NONE)
  Secure Renegotiation IS NOT supported
  Compression: NONE
  Expansion: NONE
  No ALPN negotiated
  Early data was not sent
  Verify return code: 0 (ok)
  ---

  That's openssl version 1.1.1k

  Being denied the ability to pin the SSL cert is actually a
  *degredation* of security.  Cert Pinning is particularly useful with
  self-signed certs, as is often the scenario with onion sites.

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/openssl/+bug/1934040/+subscriptions

-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
Post to : touch-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


[Touch-packages] [Bug 1934044] [NEW] openssl removed ssl2/3 and broke cURL because curl uses openssl instead of libssl

2021-06-29 Thread Bill Yikes
Public bug reported:

cURL supports a -ssl3 option (and rightly so), but openssl removed it
prematurely (see
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/openssl/+bug/1934040).  The
fallout:

torsocks curl --insecure --ssl-allow-beast -ssl3 -vvI 
https://xhfheq5i37waj6qb.onion:110 2>&1 
*   Trying 127.42.42.0:110...
* Connected to xhfheq5i37waj6qb.onion (127.42.42.0) port 110 (#0)
* OpenSSL was built without SSLv3 support
* Closing connection 0

Is it possible that curl's check for ssl3 is flawed?  I say that because
both curl and fetchmail are dependant on the same libssl pkg, and yet
fetchmail can still do ssl3 but curl can't.  Neither curl nor fetchmail
names "openssl" as a dependency.  So curl perhaps should not look to the
openssl package to detect ssl3 capability.

SSL3 is still useful for onion sites, so curl should do the necessary to
retain that capability.

** Affects: curl (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to curl in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1934044

Title:
  openssl removed ssl2/3 and broke cURL because curl uses openssl
  instead of libssl

Status in curl package in Ubuntu:
  New

Bug description:
  cURL supports a -ssl3 option (and rightly so), but openssl removed it
  prematurely (see
  https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/openssl/+bug/1934040).  The
  fallout:

  torsocks curl --insecure --ssl-allow-beast -ssl3 -vvI 
https://xhfheq5i37waj6qb.onion:110 2>&1 
  *   Trying 127.42.42.0:110...
  * Connected to xhfheq5i37waj6qb.onion (127.42.42.0) port 110 (#0)
  * OpenSSL was built without SSLv3 support
  * Closing connection 0

  Is it possible that curl's check for ssl3 is flawed?  I say that
  because both curl and fetchmail are dependant on the same libssl pkg,
  and yet fetchmail can still do ssl3 but curl can't.  Neither curl nor
  fetchmail names "openssl" as a dependency.  So curl perhaps should not
  look to the openssl package to detect ssl3 capability.

  SSL3 is still useful for onion sites, so curl should do the necessary
  to retain that capability.

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/curl/+bug/1934044/+subscriptions

-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
Post to : touch-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


[Touch-packages] [Bug 1934040] [NEW] openssl s_client's '-ssl2' & '-ssl3' options gone, prematurely!

2021-06-29 Thread Bill Yikes
Public bug reported:

SSL2 and SSL3 have been hastily removed, apparently by developers who
are unaware that these protocols serve purposes other than encryption.
SSL2/3 is *still used* on onion sites.  Why?  For verification.  An
onion site has inherent encryption, so it matters not how weak the SSL
crypto is when the purpose is purely to verify that the server is owned
by who they say it's owned by.

Proof that disclosure attacks on ssl2/3 are irrelevant to onion sites:

https://blog.torproject.org/tls-certificate-for-onion-site

So here is a real world impact case.  Suppose you get your email from
one of these onion mail servers:

http://onionmail.info/directory.html

Some (if not all) use ssl2/3 on top of Tor's inherent onion tunnel.
They force users to use ssl2/3, so even if a user configures the client
not to impose TLS, the server imposes it.  And it's reasonable because
the ssl2/3 vulns are orthoganol to the use case.

Some users will get lucky and use a mail client that still supports
ssl2/3.  But there's still a problem: users can no longer use openssl to
obtain the fingerprint to pin.  e.g.

$ openssl s_client -proxy 127.0.0.1:8118 -connect xhfheq5i37waj6qb.onion:110 
-showcerts
CONNECTED(0003)
140124399195456:error:1408F10B:SSL routines:ssl3_get_record:wrong version 
number:../ssl/record/ssl3_record.c:331:
---
no peer certificate available
---
No client certificate CA names sent
---
SSL handshake has read 44 bytes and written 330 bytes
Verification: OK
---
New, (NONE), Cipher is (NONE)
Secure Renegotiation IS NOT supported
Compression: NONE
Expansion: NONE
No ALPN negotiated
Early data was not sent
Verify return code: 0 (ok)
---

That's openssl version 1.1.1k

Being denied the ability to pin the SSL cert is actually a *degredation*
of security.  Cert Pinning is particularly useful with self-signed
certs, as is often the scenario with onion sites.

** Affects: openssl (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New

** Description changed:

  SSL2 and SSL3 have been hastily removed, apparently by developers who
  are unaware that these protocols serve purposes other than encryption.
  SSL2/3 is *still used* on onion sites.  Why?  For verification.  An
  onion site has inherent encryption, so it matters not how weak the SSL
  crypto is when the purpose is purely to verify that the server is owned
  by who they say it's owned by.
  
  Proof that disclosure attacks on ssl2/3 are irrelevant to onion sites:
  
  https://blog.torproject.org/tls-certificate-for-onion-site
  
  So here is a real world impact case.  Suppose you get your email from
  one of these onion mail servers:
  
  http://onionmail.info/directory.html
  
  Some (if not all) use ssl2/3 on top of Tor's inherent onion tunnel.
  They force users to use ssl2/3, so even if a user configures the client
  not to impose TLS, the server imposes it.  And it's reasonable because
  the ssl2/3 vulns are orthoganol to the use case.
  
  Some users will get lucky and use a mail client that still supports
  ssl2/3.  But there's still a problem: users can no longer use openssl to
  obtain the fingerprint to pin.  e.g.
  
  $ openssl s_client -proxy 127.0.0.1:8118 -connect xhfheq5i37waj6qb.onion:110 
-showcerts
  CONNECTED(0003)
  140124399195456:error:1408F10B:SSL routines:ssl3_get_record:wrong version 
number:../ssl/record/ssl3_record.c:331:
  ---
  no peer certificate available
  ---
  No client certificate CA names sent
  ---
  SSL handshake has read 44 bytes and written 330 bytes
  Verification: OK
  ---
  New, (NONE), Cipher is (NONE)
  Secure Renegotiation IS NOT supported
  Compression: NONE
  Expansion: NONE
  No ALPN negotiated
  Early data was not sent
  Verify return code: 0 (ok)
  ---
  
+ That's openssl version 1.1.1k
  
- That's openssl version 1.1.1k
+ Being denied the ability to pin the SSL cert is actually a *degredation*
+ of security.  Cert Pinning is particularly useful with self-signed
+ certs, as is often the scenario with onion sites.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to openssl in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1934040

Title:
  openssl s_client's '-ssl2' & '-ssl3' options gone, prematurely!

Status in openssl package in Ubuntu:
  New

Bug description:
  SSL2 and SSL3 have been hastily removed, apparently by developers who
  are unaware that these protocols serve purposes other than encryption.
  SSL2/3 is *still used* on onion sites.  Why?  For verification.  An
  onion site has inherent encryption, so it matters not how weak the SSL
  crypto is when the purpose is purely to verify that the server is
  owned by who they say it's owned by.

  Proof that disclosure attacks on ssl2/3 are irrelevant to onion sites:

  https://blog.torproject.org/tls-certificate-for-onion-site

  So here is a real world impact case.  Suppose you get your email from
  one of these onion mail servers:

  http://onionmail.info/directory.html

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1933913] [NEW] "Xorg -configure" results in "modprobe: FATAL: Module fbcon not found in directory /lib/modules/5.10.0-7-amd64"

2021-06-28 Thread Bill Yikes
Public bug reported:

With x11 not running, this was executed: "Xorg -configure".  It should
simply build a configuration file.  The output below appears in the
terminal with an error.  It manages to create a config file anyway, but
what it creates causes "startx" to fall over.  So I am forced to run x11
without a config file (which is a problem for me because I have two
displays and need to change the RightOf/LeftOf setting).

OUTPUT:

X.Org X Server 1.20.11
X Protocol Version 11, Revision 0
Build Operating System: linux Debian
Current Operating System: Linux billyikes 5.10.0-7-amd64 #1 SMP Debian 
5.10.40-1 (2021-05-28) x86_64
Kernel command line: BOOT_IMAGE=/boot/vmlinuz-5.10.0-7-amd64 
root=/dev/mapper/grp-root ro 
rd.luks.name=UUID=279a24dc-1014-6495-38cc-75ce88144f44=cryptdisk quiet
Build Date: 13 April 2021  04:07:31PM
xorg-server 2:1.20.11-1 (https://www.debian.org/support)
Current version of pixman: 0.40.0
Before reporting problems, check http://wiki.x.org
to make sure that you have the latest version.
Markers: (--) probed, (**) from config file, (==) default setting,
(++) from command line, (!!) notice, (II) informational,
(WW) warning, (EE) error, (NI) not implemented, (??) unknown.
(==) Log file: "/var/log/Xorg.0.log", Time: Tue Jun 29 02:19:12 2021
List of video drivers:
amdgpu
ati
intel
nouveau
qxl
radeon
vmware
modesetting
fbdev
vesa
(++) Using config file: "/root/xorg.conf.new"
(==) Using config directory: "/etc/X11/xorg.conf.d"
(==) Using system config directory "/usr/share/X11/xorg.conf.d"
modprobe: FATAL: Module fbcon not found in directory /lib/modules/5.10.0-7-amd64
intel: waited 2020 ms for i915.ko driver to load
Number of created screens does not match number of detected devices.
  Configuration failed.
(EE) Server terminated with error (2). Closing log file.

** Affects: xorg (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to xorg in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1933913

Title:
  "Xorg -configure" results in "modprobe: FATAL: Module fbcon not found
  in directory /lib/modules/5.10.0-7-amd64"

Status in xorg package in Ubuntu:
  New

Bug description:
  With x11 not running, this was executed: "Xorg -configure".  It should
  simply build a configuration file.  The output below appears in the
  terminal with an error.  It manages to create a config file anyway,
  but what it creates causes "startx" to fall over.  So I am forced to
  run x11 without a config file (which is a problem for me because I
  have two displays and need to change the RightOf/LeftOf setting).

  OUTPUT:

  X.Org X Server 1.20.11
  X Protocol Version 11, Revision 0
  Build Operating System: linux Debian
  Current Operating System: Linux billyikes 5.10.0-7-amd64 #1 SMP Debian 
5.10.40-1 (2021-05-28) x86_64
  Kernel command line: BOOT_IMAGE=/boot/vmlinuz-5.10.0-7-amd64 
root=/dev/mapper/grp-root ro 
rd.luks.name=UUID=279a24dc-1014-6495-38cc-75ce88144f44=cryptdisk quiet
  Build Date: 13 April 2021  04:07:31PM
  xorg-server 2:1.20.11-1 (https://www.debian.org/support)
  Current version of pixman: 0.40.0
  Before reporting problems, check http://wiki.x.org
  to make sure that you have the latest version.
  Markers: (--) probed, (**) from config file, (==) default setting,
  (++) from command line, (!!) notice, (II) informational,
  (WW) warning, (EE) error, (NI) not implemented, (??) unknown.
  (==) Log file: "/var/log/Xorg.0.log", Time: Tue Jun 29 02:19:12 2021
  List of video drivers:
  amdgpu
  ati
  intel
  nouveau
  qxl
  radeon
  vmware
  modesetting
  fbdev
  vesa
  (++) Using config file: "/root/xorg.conf.new"
  (==) Using config directory: "/etc/X11/xorg.conf.d"
  (==) Using system config directory "/usr/share/X11/xorg.conf.d"
  modprobe: FATAL: Module fbcon not found in directory 
/lib/modules/5.10.0-7-amd64
  intel: waited 2020 ms for i915.ko driver to load
  Number of created screens does not match number of detected devices.
Configuration failed.
  (EE) Server terminated with error (2). Closing log file.

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/xorg/+bug/1933913/+subscriptions

-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
Post to : touch-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


[Touch-packages] [Bug 1931815] Re: the %{remote_ip} output format is broken on proxied connections

2021-06-17 Thread Bill Yikes
The socks.c code shows that cURL does not even attempt DNS resolution on
SOCKS4a.  Strictly speaking, the SOCKS4a spec expects apps to /attempt/
DNS resolution before contacting the socks server.  I won't complain on
this point though because the status quo is favorable to Tor users (as
it protects them from DNS leaks).

The fallout is that the SOCKS server does not give feedback to the app
on the IP it settles on in the socks4a scenario.  This means cURL has no
possible way of knowing which IP to express in the %{remote_ip} output.

After seeing the code I'm calling out these bugs:

bug 1) SOCKS4a: Considering that Curl_resolve() is unconditionally
bypassed, when a user supplies both --resolve and also demands socks4a
cURL will neglect to honor the --resolve option even though the two
options are theoretically compatible.  This is a minor bug because
socks4 can be used instead as a workaround.  But certainly the man page
should at a minimum disclose the artificial incompatibility between
socks4a and --resolve.

bug 2) SOCKS4a docs: cURL has some discretion whether to attempt DNS
resolution or not.  Yet the docs do not clarify.  Users should get
reassurance in the man page that using socks4a unconditionally refrains
from internal DNS resolution.

bug 3) SOCKS4: Since cURL *must* do DNS resolution, cURL must also know
what the target IP is.  Thus cURL should properly return the
%{remote_ip} value.

bug 4) The docs for %{remote_ip} should tell users what to expect for
that value.  The man page is vague enough to be useless.

Workaround: if proxy users need to know which IP cURL connected to, they
must do their own DNS resolution manually outside of cURL (e.g. using
dig), supply the IP & hostname via --resolve, and use SOCKS4 or SOCKS5
(not SOCKS4a).

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to curl in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1931815

Title:
  the %{remote_ip} output format is broken on proxied connections

Status in curl package in Ubuntu:
  New

Bug description:
  This is how a Tor user would use cURL to grab a header, and also
  expect to be told which IP address was contacted:

  curl --ssl --socks4a 127.0.0.1:9050 -L --head -w '(effective URL =>
  "%{url_effective} @ %{remote_ip}")' "$target_url"

  It's broken because the "remote_ip" is actually just printed as the
  127.0.0.1 (likely that of the proxy server not the remote target
  host).

  tested on curl ver 7.52.1

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/curl/+bug/1931815/+subscriptions

-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
Post to : touch-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


[Touch-packages] [Bug 1931815] Re: the %{remote_ip} output format is broken on proxied connections

2021-06-17 Thread Bill Yikes
According to the SOCKS4a spec:

  https://www.openssh.com/txt/socks4.protocol
  https://www.openssh.com/txt/socks4a.protocol

With SOCKS4 cURL *must* do DNS resolution and pass the selected IP to
the SOCKS server.  OTOH, SOCKS4a gives cURL the option to resolve.  If
cURL fails at DNS resolution, it's expected to send the hostname and
0.0.0.x.  So generally cURL should succeed at DNS resolution and thus
have the IP of the target server.  Yet it's not sharing that info with
the user.

SOCKS4a was a bad test case because we can't know whether or not cURL
did the DNS resolution.  A better test case is with SOCKS4 as follows:

curl --ssl --socks4 127.0.0.1:9050 -L --head -w '(effective URL =>
"%{url_effective} @ %{remote_ip}")' "$target_url"

We are assured per the SOCKS4 protocol that cURL *must* do DNS
resolution, so cURL must know the remote IP address.  Yet it still
neglects to correctly set the %{remote_ip} value.  This is certainly a
bug.

Secondary bug--

the manpage states: "remote_ip The remote IP address of the most
recently done connection - can be either IPv4 or IPv6 (Added in 7.29.0)"

The man page is ambiguous. The /rule of least astonishment/ would have
the user naturally expecting "remote IP" to be the target IP whenever
cURL knows it.  Since the behavior is non-intuitive, the man page should
state in detail what the user should expect to receive for the
%{remote_ip} value.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to curl in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1931815

Title:
  the %{remote_ip} output format is broken on proxied connections

Status in curl package in Ubuntu:
  New

Bug description:
  This is how a Tor user would use cURL to grab a header, and also
  expect to be told which IP address was contacted:

  curl --ssl --socks4a 127.0.0.1:9050 -L --head -w '(effective URL =>
  "%{url_effective} @ %{remote_ip}")' "$target_url"

  It's broken because the "remote_ip" is actually just printed as the
  127.0.0.1 (likely that of the proxy server not the remote target
  host).

  tested on curl ver 7.52.1

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/curl/+bug/1931815/+subscriptions

-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
Post to : touch-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


[Touch-packages] [Bug 1931815] [NEW] the %{remote_ip} output format is broken on proxied connections

2021-06-13 Thread Bill Yikes
Public bug reported:

This is how a Tor user would use cURL to grab a header, and also expect
to be told which IP address was contacted:

curl --ssl --socks4a 127.0.0.1:9050 -L --head -w '(effective URL =>
"%{url_effective} @ %{remote_ip}")' "$target_url"

It's broken because the "remote_ip" is actually just printed as the
127.0.0.1 (likely that of the proxy server not the remote target host).

tested on curl ver 7.52.1

** Affects: curl (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to curl in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1931815

Title:
  the %{remote_ip} output format is broken on proxied connections

Status in curl package in Ubuntu:
  New

Bug description:
  This is how a Tor user would use cURL to grab a header, and also
  expect to be told which IP address was contacted:

  curl --ssl --socks4a 127.0.0.1:9050 -L --head -w '(effective URL =>
  "%{url_effective} @ %{remote_ip}")' "$target_url"

  It's broken because the "remote_ip" is actually just printed as the
  127.0.0.1 (likely that of the proxy server not the remote target
  host).

  tested on curl ver 7.52.1

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/curl/+bug/1931815/+subscriptions

-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
Post to : touch-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


[Touch-packages] [Bug 978587] Re: apt should ensure .deb are not corrupted before handing them to dpkg

2021-05-29 Thread Bill Yikes
This is actually a security issue and it's surprising it's gone unfixed
for 9 years.  It's inconsistent for apt to check the hash on deb files
that it downloads, but then neglect to do so on user-supplied deb files.
The status quo is a recipe for disaster.  To exacerbate the problem, the
man page does not document the inconsistency or the fact that .  There
are a variety of ways to fix this:

1) apt could refuse to accept local .deb files
2) apt could require local .deb files to be supplied with a hash string (which 
would need a new CLI arg)
3) apt could print the hash to the string and instruct the user to confirm 
whether the hash matches
4) apt could check the repos it's aware of to see if the hash matches anything 
served by a trusted repo.  If not, follow option 1 or 3 above.

It's also important to note that users don't generally know how deb
files are structured or how deb files are structured.  Should they be
responsible for knowing whether a hash is embedded within the deb file
or not?  Particularly when the man page makes no mention of it?
Generally, the user might know that hashes are checked by the apt-*
tools one way or another.  The apt suite of tools (and docs for it) keep
the user in the dark, and yet the user is responsible knowing how it
works.  The user is not served well in this case.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to apt in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/978587

Title:
  apt should ensure .deb are not corrupted before handing them to dpkg

Status in apt package in Ubuntu:
  Confirmed

Bug description:
  Upon upgrading to libreoffice-core 3.5.2 version, I stumbled upon what
  seems to be a bad download issue:

  Preparing to replace libreoffice-core 1:3.5.1-1ubuntu5 (using 
.../libreoffice-core_1%3a3.5.2-2ubuntu1_amd64.deb) ...
  rmdir: failed to remove `/var/lib/libreoffice/basis3.4/program/': No such 
file or directory
  rmdir: failed to remove `/var/lib/libreoffice/basis3.4': No such file or 
directory
  Unpacking replacement libreoffice-core ...
  dpkg-deb (subprocess): data: internal bzip2 read error: 'DATA_ERROR'
  dpkg-deb: error: subprocess  returned error exit status 2
  dpkg: error processing 
/var/cache/apt/archives/libreoffice-core_1%3a3.5.2-2ubuntu1_amd64.deb 
(--unpack):
   subprocess dpkg-deb --fsys-tarfile returned error exit status 2

  I was asked to file a bug about it, as it might be possible for dpkg
  to recover from that more gracefully.

  Further information upon requests.

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/apt/+bug/978587/+subscriptions

-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
Post to : touch-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


[Touch-packages] [Bug 1930139] [NEW] the --no-directories option incorrectly documented in the man page

2021-05-29 Thread Bill Yikes
Public bug reported:

man page shows:

   -nd
   --no-directories
   Do not create a hierarchy of directories when retrieving 
recursively.  With this option turned on, all files will get saved
   to the current directory, without clobbering (if a name shows up 
more than once, the filenames will get extensions .n).


The way that's written implies that the -nd option would conflict with the -P 
option.  But when -nd is combined with --directory-prefix (-P), wget honors the 
prefix and also downloads to a flat non-hierarchical "structure".  The behavior 
is sensible but the docs are wrong (-nd does not necessarily download to the 
current dir).

** Affects: wget (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to wget in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1930139

Title:
  the --no-directories option incorrectly documented in the man page

Status in wget package in Ubuntu:
  New

Bug description:
  man page shows:

 -nd
 --no-directories
 Do not create a hierarchy of directories when retrieving 
recursively.  With this option turned on, all files will get saved
 to the current directory, without clobbering (if a name shows up 
more than once, the filenames will get extensions .n).

  
  The way that's written implies that the -nd option would conflict with the -P 
option.  But when -nd is combined with --directory-prefix (-P), wget honors the 
prefix and also downloads to a flat non-hierarchical "structure".  The behavior 
is sensible but the docs are wrong (-nd does not necessarily download to the 
current dir).

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/wget/+bug/1930139/+subscriptions

-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
Post to : touch-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


[Touch-packages] [Bug 1929087] Re: sfdisk refuses to write GPT table between sector 34 and 2047

2021-05-20 Thread Bill Yikes
A secondary bug manifests from this, whereby sfdisk chokes on its own
output and therefore cannot restore its own backup.  E.g. suppose
another tool is used to put a BIOS boot partition from sector 34 to
2047, as follows:

$ sgdisk --clear -a 1 --new=1:34:2047 -c 1:"BIOS boot"
--typecode=1:$(sgdisk --list-types | sed -ne
's/.*\(\).bios.*/\1/gip') /dev/sdb

That works fine, and from that we can run "sfdisk -d /dev/sdb >
dump.txt".  But when dump.txt is fed back into sfdisk, it pukes.  Yet
the docs claim "It is recommended to save the layout of your devices.
sfdisk supports two ways." .. "Use  the  --dump  option to save a
description of the device layout to a text file." .. "This can later be
restored by: sfdisk /dev/sda < sda.dump"

It's actually a security issue, because someone can make an non-
restorable backup and have the false sense of security that it is
restorable.  They wouldn't necessary test restoration either because
that's a destructive process.

** Description changed:

  According to https://wiki.archlinux.org/title/GRUB#BIOS_systems, it's
  both legal and interesting to place the BIOS BOOT partition from sector
  34 to sector 2047, as follows:
  
  $ sudo sfdisk --no-act -f --label gpt /dev/sdb << EOF
  start=   34, size=2013, name=bios,   type=$(sfdisk 
--label gpt -T | awk '{IGNORECASE = 1;} /bios boot/{print $1}')
  start= 2048, size=12582912, name=swap,   type=$(sfdisk 
--label gpt -T | awk '{IGNORECASE = 1;} /linux swap/{print $1}')
  EOF
  
  The output is:
  
  /dev/sdb1: Sector 34 already used.
  Failed to add #1 partition: Numerical result out of range
  Leaving.
  
- It's a false error.  As a workaround, users must omit the BIOS BOOT
- partition then use gdisk to insert it manually.  This was uncovered in
- 2015 and perhaps never reported to a bug tracker because it's still
- broken.  See https://www.spinics.net/lists/util-linux-ng/msg11253.html
+ It's a false error.  As a workaround, users must use parted or sgdisk
+ instead.  (note fdisk & gdisk are also broken in the same way)
+ 
+ This bug was uncovered in 2015 and perhaps never reported to a bug
+ tracker because it's still broken.  See https://www.spinics.net/lists
+ /util-linux-ng/msg11253.html

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to util-linux in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1929087

Title:
  sfdisk refuses to write GPT table between sector 34 and 2047

Status in util-linux package in Ubuntu:
  New

Bug description:
  According to https://wiki.archlinux.org/title/GRUB#BIOS_systems, it's
  both legal and interesting to place the BIOS BOOT partition from
  sector 34 to sector 2047, as follows:

  $ sudo sfdisk --no-act -f --label gpt /dev/sdb << EOF
  start=   34, size=2013, name=bios,   type=$(sfdisk 
--label gpt -T | awk '{IGNORECASE = 1;} /bios boot/{print $1}')
  start= 2048, size=12582912, name=swap,   type=$(sfdisk 
--label gpt -T | awk '{IGNORECASE = 1;} /linux swap/{print $1}')
  EOF

  The output is:

  /dev/sdb1: Sector 34 already used.
  Failed to add #1 partition: Numerical result out of range
  Leaving.

  It's a false error.  As a workaround, users must use parted or sgdisk
  instead.  (note fdisk & gdisk are also broken in the same way)

  This bug was uncovered in 2015 and perhaps never reported to a bug
  tracker because it's still broken.  See https://www.spinics.net/lists
  /util-linux-ng/msg11253.html

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/util-linux/+bug/1929087/+subscriptions

-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
Post to : touch-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


[Touch-packages] [Bug 1929087] [NEW] sfdisk refuses to write GPT table between sector 34 and 2047

2021-05-20 Thread Bill Yikes
Public bug reported:

According to https://wiki.archlinux.org/title/GRUB#BIOS_systems, it's
both legal and interesting to place the BIOS BOOT partition from sector
34 to sector 2047, as follows:

$ sudo sfdisk --no-act -f --label gpt /dev/sdb << EOF
start=   34, size=2013, name=bios,   type=$(sfdisk --label 
gpt -T | awk '{IGNORECASE = 1;} /bios boot/{print $1}')
start= 2048, size=12582912, name=swap,   type=$(sfdisk --label 
gpt -T | awk '{IGNORECASE = 1;} /linux swap/{print $1}')
EOF

The output is:

/dev/sdb1: Sector 34 already used.
Failed to add #1 partition: Numerical result out of range
Leaving.

It's a false error.  As a workaround, users must omit the BIOS BOOT
partition then use gdisk to insert it manually.  This was uncovered in
2015 and perhaps never reported to a bug tracker because it's still
broken.  See https://www.spinics.net/lists/util-linux-ng/msg11253.html

** Affects: util-linux (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to util-linux in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1929087

Title:
  sfdisk refuses to write GPT table between sector 34 and 2047

Status in util-linux package in Ubuntu:
  New

Bug description:
  According to https://wiki.archlinux.org/title/GRUB#BIOS_systems, it's
  both legal and interesting to place the BIOS BOOT partition from
  sector 34 to sector 2047, as follows:

  $ sudo sfdisk --no-act -f --label gpt /dev/sdb << EOF
  start=   34, size=2013, name=bios,   type=$(sfdisk 
--label gpt -T | awk '{IGNORECASE = 1;} /bios boot/{print $1}')
  start= 2048, size=12582912, name=swap,   type=$(sfdisk 
--label gpt -T | awk '{IGNORECASE = 1;} /linux swap/{print $1}')
  EOF

  The output is:

  /dev/sdb1: Sector 34 already used.
  Failed to add #1 partition: Numerical result out of range
  Leaving.

  It's a false error.  As a workaround, users must omit the BIOS BOOT
  partition then use gdisk to insert it manually.  This was uncovered in
  2015 and perhaps never reported to a bug tracker because it's still
  broken.  See https://www.spinics.net/lists/util-linux-ng/msg11253.html

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/util-linux/+bug/1929087/+subscriptions

-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
Post to : touch-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


[Touch-packages] [Bug 1925973] Re: Nvidia driver 450.119 crashes lxpanel on Ubuntu 18.04

2021-04-23 Thread Bill Miller
** Changed in: xorg (Ubuntu)
   Status: New => Invalid

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to xorg in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1925973

Title:
  Nvidia driver 450.119 crashes lxpanel on Ubuntu 18.04

Status in xorg package in Ubuntu:
  Invalid

Bug description:
  Running Ubuntu 18.04 with the LXDE desktop.

  After installing the Nvidia driver version 450.119 and rebooting, the
  LXDE desktop crashes, specifically lxpanel.

  Reloaded clonezilla clone of / with Nvidia driver 450.102, all is well
  again.

  ProblemType: Bug
  DistroRelease: Ubuntu 18.04
  Package: xorg 1:7.7+19ubuntu7.1
  ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 5.4.0-72.80~18.04.1-generic 5.4.101
  Uname: Linux 5.4.0-72-generic x86_64
  NonfreeKernelModules: nvidia_modeset nvidia
  .proc.driver.nvidia.capabilities.gpu0: Error: [Errno 21] Is a directory: 
'/proc/driver/nvidia/capabilities/gpu0'
  .proc.driver.nvidia.capabilities.mig: Error: [Errno 21] Is a directory: 
'/proc/driver/nvidia/capabilities/mig'
  .proc.driver.nvidia.gpus..01.00.0: Error: [Errno 21] Is a directory: 
'/proc/driver/nvidia/gpus/:01:00.0'
  .proc.driver.nvidia.registry: Binary: ""
  .proc.driver.nvidia.suspend: suspend hibernate resume
  .proc.driver.nvidia.suspend_depth: default modeset uvm
  .proc.driver.nvidia.version:
   NVRM version: NVIDIA UNIX x86_64 Kernel Module  450.102.04  Tue Dec 29 
06:51:23 UTC 2020
   GCC version:  gcc version 7.5.0 (Ubuntu 7.5.0-3ubuntu1~18.04)
  ApportVersion: 2.20.9-0ubuntu7.23
  Architecture: amd64
  BootLog: Error: [Errno 13] Permission denied: '/var/log/boot.log'
  CompizPlugins: No value set for 
`/apps/compiz-1/general/screen0/options/active_plugins'
  CompositorRunning: None
  CurrentDesktop: LXDE
  Date: Fri Apr 23 15:46:27 2021
  DistUpgraded: Fresh install
  DistroCodename: bionic
  DistroVariant: ubuntu
  DkmsStatus:
   nvidia, 450.102.04, 5.4.0-67-generic, x86_64: installed
   nvidia, 450.102.04, 5.4.0-70-generic, x86_64: installed
   nvidia, 450.102.04, 5.4.0-72-generic, x86_64: installed
  ExtraDebuggingInterest: Yes
  GraphicsCard:
   NVIDIA Corporation GP107 [GeForce GTX 1050 Ti] [10de:1c82] (rev a1) (prog-if 
00 [VGA controller])
     Subsystem: eVga.com. Corp. GP107 [GeForce GTX 1050 Ti] [3842:6253]
  InstallationDate: Installed on 2018-04-27 (1092 days ago)
  InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 18.04 LTS "Bionic Beaver" - Release amd64 (20180426)
  MachineType: ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC. M11AD
  ProcKernelCmdLine: BOOT_IMAGE=/boot/vmlinuz-5.4.0-72-generic 
root=UUID=0ca22edb-e6b0-412b-ad6e-00b2126b37c7 ro quiet splash vt.handoff=1
  SourcePackage: xorg
  Symptom: display
  UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install)
  dmi.bios.date: 08/15/2013
  dmi.bios.vendor: American Megatrends Inc.
  dmi.bios.version: 0302
  dmi.board.asset.tag: To be filled by O.E.M.
  dmi.board.name: M11AD
  dmi.board.vendor: ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC.
  dmi.board.version: Rev X.0x
  dmi.chassis.asset.tag: Asset-1234567890
  dmi.chassis.type: 3
  dmi.chassis.vendor: Chassis Manufacture
  dmi.chassis.version: Chassis Version
  dmi.modalias: 
dmi:bvnAmericanMegatrendsInc.:bvr0302:bd08/15/2013:svnASUSTeKCOMPUTERINC.:pnM11AD:pvrSystemVersion:rvnASUSTeKCOMPUTERINC.:rnM11AD:rvrRevX.0x:cvnChassisManufacture:ct3:cvrChassisVersion:
  dmi.product.family: Desktop
  dmi.product.name: M11AD
  dmi.product.sku: All
  dmi.product.version: System Version
  dmi.sys.vendor: ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC.
  version.compiz: compiz N/A
  version.libdrm2: libdrm2 2.4.101-2~18.04.1
  version.libgl1-mesa-dri: libgl1-mesa-dri 20.0.8-0ubuntu1~18.04.1
  version.libgl1-mesa-glx: libgl1-mesa-glx 20.0.8-0ubuntu1~18.04.1
  version.nvidia-graphics-drivers: nvidia-graphics-drivers-* N/A
  version.xserver-xorg-core: xserver-xorg-core N/A
  version.xserver-xorg-input-evdev: xserver-xorg-input-evdev N/A
  version.xserver-xorg-video-ati: xserver-xorg-video-ati N/A
  version.xserver-xorg-video-intel: xserver-xorg-video-intel N/A
  version.xserver-xorg-video-nouveau: xserver-xorg-video-nouveau N/A

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/xorg/+bug/1925973/+subscriptions

-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
Post to : touch-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


[Touch-packages] [Bug 1925973] [NEW] Nvidia driver 450.119 crashes lxpanel on Ubuntu 18.04

2021-04-23 Thread Bill Miller
Public bug reported:

Running Ubuntu 18.04 with the LXDE desktop.

After installing the Nvidia driver version 450.119 and rebooting, the
LXDE desktop crashes, specifically lxpanel.

Reloaded clonezilla clone of / with Nvidia driver 450.102, all is well
again.

ProblemType: Bug
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 18.04
Package: xorg 1:7.7+19ubuntu7.1
ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 5.4.0-72.80~18.04.1-generic 5.4.101
Uname: Linux 5.4.0-72-generic x86_64
NonfreeKernelModules: nvidia_modeset nvidia
.proc.driver.nvidia.capabilities.gpu0: Error: [Errno 21] Is a directory: 
'/proc/driver/nvidia/capabilities/gpu0'
.proc.driver.nvidia.capabilities.mig: Error: [Errno 21] Is a directory: 
'/proc/driver/nvidia/capabilities/mig'
.proc.driver.nvidia.gpus..01.00.0: Error: [Errno 21] Is a directory: 
'/proc/driver/nvidia/gpus/:01:00.0'
.proc.driver.nvidia.registry: Binary: ""
.proc.driver.nvidia.suspend: suspend hibernate resume
.proc.driver.nvidia.suspend_depth: default modeset uvm
.proc.driver.nvidia.version:
 NVRM version: NVIDIA UNIX x86_64 Kernel Module  450.102.04  Tue Dec 29 
06:51:23 UTC 2020
 GCC version:  gcc version 7.5.0 (Ubuntu 7.5.0-3ubuntu1~18.04)
ApportVersion: 2.20.9-0ubuntu7.23
Architecture: amd64
BootLog: Error: [Errno 13] Permission denied: '/var/log/boot.log'
CompizPlugins: No value set for 
`/apps/compiz-1/general/screen0/options/active_plugins'
CompositorRunning: None
CurrentDesktop: LXDE
Date: Fri Apr 23 15:46:27 2021
DistUpgraded: Fresh install
DistroCodename: bionic
DistroVariant: ubuntu
DkmsStatus:
 nvidia, 450.102.04, 5.4.0-67-generic, x86_64: installed
 nvidia, 450.102.04, 5.4.0-70-generic, x86_64: installed
 nvidia, 450.102.04, 5.4.0-72-generic, x86_64: installed
ExtraDebuggingInterest: Yes
GraphicsCard:
 NVIDIA Corporation GP107 [GeForce GTX 1050 Ti] [10de:1c82] (rev a1) (prog-if 
00 [VGA controller])
   Subsystem: eVga.com. Corp. GP107 [GeForce GTX 1050 Ti] [3842:6253]
InstallationDate: Installed on 2018-04-27 (1092 days ago)
InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 18.04 LTS "Bionic Beaver" - Release amd64 (20180426)
MachineType: ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC. M11AD
ProcKernelCmdLine: BOOT_IMAGE=/boot/vmlinuz-5.4.0-72-generic 
root=UUID=0ca22edb-e6b0-412b-ad6e-00b2126b37c7 ro quiet splash vt.handoff=1
SourcePackage: xorg
Symptom: display
UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install)
dmi.bios.date: 08/15/2013
dmi.bios.vendor: American Megatrends Inc.
dmi.bios.version: 0302
dmi.board.asset.tag: To be filled by O.E.M.
dmi.board.name: M11AD
dmi.board.vendor: ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC.
dmi.board.version: Rev X.0x
dmi.chassis.asset.tag: Asset-1234567890
dmi.chassis.type: 3
dmi.chassis.vendor: Chassis Manufacture
dmi.chassis.version: Chassis Version
dmi.modalias: 
dmi:bvnAmericanMegatrendsInc.:bvr0302:bd08/15/2013:svnASUSTeKCOMPUTERINC.:pnM11AD:pvrSystemVersion:rvnASUSTeKCOMPUTERINC.:rnM11AD:rvrRevX.0x:cvnChassisManufacture:ct3:cvrChassisVersion:
dmi.product.family: Desktop
dmi.product.name: M11AD
dmi.product.sku: All
dmi.product.version: System Version
dmi.sys.vendor: ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC.
version.compiz: compiz N/A
version.libdrm2: libdrm2 2.4.101-2~18.04.1
version.libgl1-mesa-dri: libgl1-mesa-dri 20.0.8-0ubuntu1~18.04.1
version.libgl1-mesa-glx: libgl1-mesa-glx 20.0.8-0ubuntu1~18.04.1
version.nvidia-graphics-drivers: nvidia-graphics-drivers-* N/A
version.xserver-xorg-core: xserver-xorg-core N/A
version.xserver-xorg-input-evdev: xserver-xorg-input-evdev N/A
version.xserver-xorg-video-ati: xserver-xorg-video-ati N/A
version.xserver-xorg-video-intel: xserver-xorg-video-intel N/A
version.xserver-xorg-video-nouveau: xserver-xorg-video-nouveau N/A

** Affects: xorg (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New


** Tags: amd64 apport-bug bionic third-party-packages ubuntu

** Description changed:

  Running Ubuntu 18.04 with the LXDE desktop.
  
- After installing the Nvidia driver version 150.119 and rebooting, the
+ After installing the Nvidia driver version 450.119 and rebooting, the
  LXDE desktop crashes, specifically lxpanel.
  
  Reloaded clonezilla clone of / with Nvidia driver 150.102, all is well
  again.
  
  ProblemType: Bug
  DistroRelease: Ubuntu 18.04
  Package: xorg 1:7.7+19ubuntu7.1
  ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 5.4.0-72.80~18.04.1-generic 5.4.101
  Uname: Linux 5.4.0-72-generic x86_64
  NonfreeKernelModules: nvidia_modeset nvidia
  .proc.driver.nvidia.capabilities.gpu0: Error: [Errno 21] Is a directory: 
'/proc/driver/nvidia/capabilities/gpu0'
  .proc.driver.nvidia.capabilities.mig: Error: [Errno 21] Is a directory: 
'/proc/driver/nvidia/capabilities/mig'
  .proc.driver.nvidia.gpus..01.00.0: Error: [Errno 21] Is a directory: 
'/proc/driver/nvidia/gpus/:01:00.0'
  .proc.driver.nvidia.registry: Binary: ""
  .proc.driver.nvidia.suspend: suspend hibernate resume
  .proc.driver.nvidia.suspend_depth: default modeset uvm
  .proc.driver.nvidia.version:
-  NVRM version: NVIDIA UNIX x86_64 Kernel Module  450.102.04  Tue Dec 29 
06:51:23 UTC 2020
-  GCC version:  gcc version 7.5.0 (Ubuntu 

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1925381] Re: rsync conceals file deletions from reporting when --dry-run --remove-source-files are used together

2021-04-22 Thread Bill Yikes
For me the fact that the upstream repo moved from bugzilla.samba.org to
github.com is sufficient to diverge from upstream. But to each his own.

My contempt for github is in fact why I reported the bug downstream. I
will not use github but I still intended to make a public record of the
bug, hence why it's here.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to rsync in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1925381

Title:
  rsync conceals file deletions from reporting when --dry-run --remove-
  source-files are used together

Status in rsync package in Ubuntu:
  Triaged

Bug description:
  Rsync has an astonishing and dangerous bug:

  The dry run feature (-n / --dry-run) inhibits reporting of file
  deletions when --remove-source-files is used. This is quite serious.
  People use --dry-run to see if an outcome will work as expected before
  a live run. When the simulated run shows *less* destruction than the
  live run, the consequences can be serious because rsync may
  unexpectedly destroy the only copy(*) of a file.

  Users rely on --dry-run. Although users probably expect --dry-run to
  have limitations, we don't expect destructive operations to be under
  reported. If it were reversed, such that the live run were less
  destructive than the dry run, this wouldn't be as serious.

  Reproducer:

  $ mkdir -p /tmp/src /tmp/dest
  $ printf '%s\n' 'yada yada' > /tmp/src/foo.txt
  $ printf '%s\n' 'yada yada' > /tmp/src/bar.txt
  $ cp /tmp/src/foo.txt /tmp/dest
  $ ls /tmp/src/ /tmp/dest/
  /tmp/dest/:
  foo.txt

  /tmp/src/:
  bar.txt  foo.txt

  $ rsync -na --info=remove1 --remove-source-files --existing src/* dest/
  (no output)

  $ rsync -a --info=remove1 --remove-source-files --existing src/* dest/
  sender removed foo.txt

  $ ls /tmp/src/ /tmp/dest/
  /tmp/dest/:
  foo.txt

  /tmp/src/:
  bar.txt

  (*) note when I say it can destroy the only copy of a file, another
  circumstance is needed: that is, rsync does not do a checksum by
  default.  It checks for identical files based on superficial
  parameters like name and date.  So it's possible that two files match
  in the default superficial comparison but differ in the actual
  content.  Losing a unique file in this scenario is perhaps a rare
  corner case, but this bug should be fixed nonetheless.  In the typical
  case of losing files at the source, there is still a significant
  inconvenience of trying to identify what files to copy back.

  Note this bug is similar but differs in a few ways:
  https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3844

  I've marked this as a security vulnerability because it causes
  unexpected data loss due to --dry-run creating a false expectation.

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/rsync/+bug/1925381/+subscriptions

-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
Post to : touch-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


[Touch-packages] [Bug 1925381] Re: rsync conceals file deletions from reporting when --dry-run --remove-source-files are used together

2021-04-21 Thread Bill Yikes
** Description changed:

  Rsync has an astonishing and dangerous bug:
  
  The dry run feature (-n / --dry-run) fails to report file deletions when
  --remove-source-files is used. This is quite serious. People use --dry-
  run to see if an outcome will work as expected before a live run. When
  the simulated run shows *less* destruction than the live run, the
  consequences can be serious because rsync may unexpectedly destroy the
- only copy of a file.
+ only copy(*) of a file.
  
  Users rely on --dry-run. Although users probably expect --dry-run to
  have limitations, we don't expect destructive operations to be under
  reported. If it were reversed, such that the live run were less
  destructive than the dry run, this wouldn't be as serious.
  
  Reproducer:
  
  $ mkdir -p /tmp/src /tmp/dest
  $ printf '%s\n' 'yada yada' > /tmp/src/foo.txt
  $ printf '%s\n' 'yada yada' > /tmp/src/bar.txt
  $ cp /tmp/src/foo.txt /tmp/dest
  $ ls /tmp/src/ /tmp/dest/
  /tmp/dest/:
  foo.txt
  
  /tmp/src/:
  bar.txt  foo.txt
  
  $ rsync -na --info=remove1 --remove-source-files --existing src/* dest/
  (no output)
  
  $ rsync -a --info=remove1 --remove-source-files --existing src/* dest/
  sender removed foo.txt
  
  $ ls /tmp/src/ /tmp/dest/
  /tmp/dest/:
  foo.txt
  
  /tmp/src/:
  bar.txt
  
+ (*) note when I say it can destroy the only copy of a file, another
+ circumstance is needed: that is, rsync does not do a checksum by
+ default.  It checks for identical files based on parameters like name
+ and date.  So it's possible that two files match in the default
+ comparison but differ in the actual content.  Losing a unique file in
+ this scenario is perhaps a rare corner case, but this bug should be
+ fixed nonetheless.
+ 
  Note this bug is similar but differs in a few ways:
  https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3844
  
  I've marked this as a security vulnerability because it causes
  unexpected data loss due to --dry-run creating a false expectation.

** Description changed:

  Rsync has an astonishing and dangerous bug:
  
  The dry run feature (-n / --dry-run) fails to report file deletions when
  --remove-source-files is used. This is quite serious. People use --dry-
  run to see if an outcome will work as expected before a live run. When
  the simulated run shows *less* destruction than the live run, the
  consequences can be serious because rsync may unexpectedly destroy the
  only copy(*) of a file.
  
  Users rely on --dry-run. Although users probably expect --dry-run to
  have limitations, we don't expect destructive operations to be under
  reported. If it were reversed, such that the live run were less
  destructive than the dry run, this wouldn't be as serious.
  
  Reproducer:
  
  $ mkdir -p /tmp/src /tmp/dest
  $ printf '%s\n' 'yada yada' > /tmp/src/foo.txt
  $ printf '%s\n' 'yada yada' > /tmp/src/bar.txt
  $ cp /tmp/src/foo.txt /tmp/dest
  $ ls /tmp/src/ /tmp/dest/
  /tmp/dest/:
  foo.txt
  
  /tmp/src/:
  bar.txt  foo.txt
  
  $ rsync -na --info=remove1 --remove-source-files --existing src/* dest/
  (no output)
  
  $ rsync -a --info=remove1 --remove-source-files --existing src/* dest/
  sender removed foo.txt
  
  $ ls /tmp/src/ /tmp/dest/
  /tmp/dest/:
  foo.txt
  
  /tmp/src/:
  bar.txt
  
  (*) note when I say it can destroy the only copy of a file, another
  circumstance is needed: that is, rsync does not do a checksum by
- default.  It checks for identical files based on parameters like name
- and date.  So it's possible that two files match in the default
- comparison but differ in the actual content.  Losing a unique file in
- this scenario is perhaps a rare corner case, but this bug should be
- fixed nonetheless.
+ default.  It checks for identical files based on superficial parameters
+ like name and date.  So it's possible that two files match in the
+ default superficial comparison but differ in the actual content.  Losing
+ a unique file in this scenario is perhaps a rare corner case, but this
+ bug should be fixed nonetheless.
  
  Note this bug is similar but differs in a few ways:
  https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3844
  
  I've marked this as a security vulnerability because it causes
  unexpected data loss due to --dry-run creating a false expectation.

** Description changed:

  Rsync has an astonishing and dangerous bug:
  
- The dry run feature (-n / --dry-run) fails to report file deletions when
- --remove-source-files is used. This is quite serious. People use --dry-
- run to see if an outcome will work as expected before a live run. When
- the simulated run shows *less* destruction than the live run, the
- consequences can be serious because rsync may unexpectedly destroy the
- only copy(*) of a file.
+ The dry run feature (-n / --dry-run) inhibits reporting of file
+ deletions when --remove-source-files is used. This is quite serious.
+ People use --dry-run to see if an outcome will work as expected before a
+ live run. When the simulated run shows 

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1925381] [NEW] rsync conceals file deletions from reporting when --dry-run --remove-source-files are used together

2021-04-21 Thread Bill Yikes
Public bug reported:

Rsync has an astonishing and dangerous bug:

The dry run feature (-n / --dry-run) fails to report file deletions when
--remove-source-files is used. This is quite serious. People use --dry-
run to see if an outcome will work as expected before a live run. When
the simulated run shows *less* destruction than the live run, the
consequences can be serious because rsync may unexpectedly destroy the
only copy of a file.

Users rely on --dry-run. Although users probably expect --dry-run to
have limitations, we don't expect destructive operations to be under
reported. If it were reversed, such that the live run were less
destructive than the dry run, this wouldn't be as serious.

Reproducer:

$ mkdir -p /tmp/src /tmp/dest
$ printf '%s\n' 'yada yada' > /tmp/src/foo.txt
$ printf '%s\n' 'yada yada' > /tmp/src/bar.txt
$ cp /tmp/src/foo.txt /tmp/dest
$ ls /tmp/src/ /tmp/dest/
/tmp/dest/:
foo.txt

/tmp/src/:
bar.txt  foo.txt

$ rsync -na --info=remove1 --remove-source-files --existing src/* dest/
(no output)

$ rsync -a --info=remove1 --remove-source-files --existing src/* dest/
sender removed foo.txt

$ ls /tmp/src/ /tmp/dest/
/tmp/dest/:
foo.txt

/tmp/src/:
bar.txt

Note this bug is similar but differs in a few ways:
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3844

I've marked this as a security vulnerability because it causes
unexpected data loss due to --dry-run creating a false expectation.

** Affects: rsync (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New

** Information type changed from Private Security to Public

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to rsync in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1925381

Title:
  rsync conceals file deletions from reporting when --dry-run --remove-
  source-files are used together

Status in rsync package in Ubuntu:
  New

Bug description:
  Rsync has an astonishing and dangerous bug:

  The dry run feature (-n / --dry-run) fails to report file deletions
  when --remove-source-files is used. This is quite serious. People use
  --dry-run to see if an outcome will work as expected before a live
  run. When the simulated run shows *less* destruction than the live
  run, the consequences can be serious because rsync may unexpectedly
  destroy the only copy of a file.

  Users rely on --dry-run. Although users probably expect --dry-run to
  have limitations, we don't expect destructive operations to be under
  reported. If it were reversed, such that the live run were less
  destructive than the dry run, this wouldn't be as serious.

  Reproducer:

  $ mkdir -p /tmp/src /tmp/dest
  $ printf '%s\n' 'yada yada' > /tmp/src/foo.txt
  $ printf '%s\n' 'yada yada' > /tmp/src/bar.txt
  $ cp /tmp/src/foo.txt /tmp/dest
  $ ls /tmp/src/ /tmp/dest/
  /tmp/dest/:
  foo.txt

  /tmp/src/:
  bar.txt  foo.txt

  $ rsync -na --info=remove1 --remove-source-files --existing src/* dest/
  (no output)

  $ rsync -a --info=remove1 --remove-source-files --existing src/* dest/
  sender removed foo.txt

  $ ls /tmp/src/ /tmp/dest/
  /tmp/dest/:
  foo.txt

  /tmp/src/:
  bar.txt

  Note this bug is similar but differs in a few ways:
  https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3844

  I've marked this as a security vulnerability because it causes
  unexpected data loss due to --dry-run creating a false expectation.

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/rsync/+bug/1925381/+subscriptions

-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
Post to : touch-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


[Touch-packages] [Bug 1916931] Re: omshell returns inconsistent results or segfaults

2021-03-01 Thread Bill MacAllister
I imported version 4.4.2 from upstream and built for focal.  The problem
persists.  OMAPI failover queries work sometimes and fail most of the
time.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to isc-dhcp in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1916931

Title:
  omshell returns inconsistent results or segfaults

Status in isc-dhcp package in Ubuntu:
  New

Bug description:
  I have just built a Ubuntu 20.04 server and installed isc-dhcp-server
  4.4.1 on it and I am seeing inconsistent returns from omshell. 
  Initially omshell returns data as expected, but when I exit and re-enter 
  omshell connections fail.

  Here is the initial, working, session:

  # omshell
  > server localhost
  > port 7911
  > key omapi_key 
  > connect
  obj: 
  > new failover-state
  obj: failover-state
  > set name = "dhcp-failover"
  obj: failover-state
  name = "dhcp-failover"
  > open
  obj: failover-state
  name = "dhcp-failover"
  partner-address = c0:9d:e9:76:e9:55:00:00
  partner-port = 00:00:02:07
  local-address = 10:9d:e9:76:e9:55:00:00
  local-port = 00:00:02:07
  max-outstanding-updates = 00:00:00:0a
  mclt = 00:00:01:2c
  load-balance-max-secs = 00:00:00:03
  load-balance-hba =
  
ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:00:00:00:00:00:00:00:00:00:00:00:00:00:00:00:00
  partner-state = 00:00:00:02
  local-state = 00:00:00:02
  partner-stos = 60:36:d0:68
  local-stos = 60:36:8b:3b
  hierarchy = 00:00:00:01
  last-packet-sent = 00:00:00:00
  last-timestamp-received = 00:00:00:00
  skew = 00:00:00:00
  max-response-delay = 00:00:00:3c
  cur-unacked-updates = 00:00:00:00

  Here is what I see when the connect fails.  Well, just hangs really.

  # omshell
  > server localhost
  > port 7911
  > key omapi_key 
  > connect

  And then I hit ctrl-c to break out and tried again:

  # omshell
  > server localhost
  > port 7911
  > key omapi_key 
  > connect
  Segmentation fault (core dumped)

  Note, the peer to this server is still running Ubuntu 18.04 with
  isc-dhcp-server 4.3.5.  Running the exact same commands on the peer
  works reliably.  (They are using the same python script to drive
  omshell.)  The DHCP server on the new system appears to be working 
  just fine as reported by omshell on the peer and systemctl.

  I was curious if the problem could be with the mis-matched versions
  of isc-dhcp-server so I shutdown isc-dhcp-server on the 18.04 system
  and get the same results.

  I also tried using a python script with the pypureomapi module to
  try and determine if the problem was in omshell or the server.  I 
  got very similar results when I attempted to get information about
  the failover state of the server.  Interestingly interrogating
  the server about host information seems to work just fine.

  This is a critical bug since I don't see how to fail over a DHCP
  that is running the isc-dhcp-server on 20.04 without being able
  to issue omapi commands.

  I am attaching apport output to this bug report.

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/isc-dhcp/+bug/1916931/+subscriptions

-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
Post to : touch-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


[Touch-packages] [Bug 1917183] Re: Font spacing and rendering is wrong in latest 21.04

2021-02-28 Thread Bill (franksmcb)
** Changed in: fonts-noto-color-emoji (Ubuntu)
   Status: New => Confirmed

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to fontconfig in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1917183

Title:
  Font spacing and rendering is wrong in latest 21.04

Status in Ubuntu MATE:
  Confirmed
Status in firefox package in Ubuntu:
  Confirmed
Status in fontconfig package in Ubuntu:
  Confirmed
Status in fonts-noto-color-emoji package in Ubuntu:
  Confirmed
Status in yelp package in Ubuntu:
  Confirmed

Bug description:
  Ubuntu MATE 21.04 Font spacing is incorrect.

  Including screen shots of pages.

  This front spacing issue is occurring whilst filing this bug report on
  Launchpad.

  Expected outcome:
  Font's space and render properly in Firefox

  Actual outcome:
  Font space and render is incorrect.

  ProblemType: Bug
  DistroRelease: Ubuntu 21.04
  Package: firefox 86.0+build3-0ubuntu1
  ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 5.10.0-14.15-generic 5.10.11
  Uname: Linux 5.10.0-14-generic x86_64
  AddonCompatCheckDisabled: False
  ApportVersion: 2.20.11-0ubuntu59
  Architecture: amd64
  AudioDevicesInUse:
   USERPID ACCESS COMMAND
   /dev/snd/controlC0:  franksmcb   2695 F pulseaudio
  BuildID: 20210222142601
  CasperMD5CheckResult: unknown
  Channel: Unavailable
  CurrentDesktop: MATE
  Date: Sat Feb 27 16:50:33 2021
  DefaultProfileExtensions: extensions.sqlite corrupt or missing
  DefaultProfileIncompatibleExtensions: Unavailable (corrupt or non-existant 
compatibility.ini or extensions.sqlite)
  DefaultProfileLocales: extensions.sqlite corrupt or missing
  DefaultProfilePrefErrors: Unexpected character ',' before close parenthesis @ 
/usr/lib/firefox/omni.ja:greprefs.js:348
  DefaultProfilePrefSources:
   /usr/lib/firefox/defaults/pref/all-ubuntumate.js
   prefs.js
  DefaultProfileThemes: extensions.sqlite corrupt or missing
  ForcedLayersAccel: False
  IfupdownConfig:
   # interfaces(5) file used by ifup(8) and ifdown(8)
   # Include files from /etc/network/interfaces.d:
   source-directory /etc/network/interfaces.d
  InstallationDate: Installed on 2019-12-13 (442 days ago)
  InstallationMedia: Ubuntu-MATE 20.04 LTS "Focal Fossa" - Alpha amd64 
(20191213)
  IpRoute:
   default via 192.168.1.1 dev wlp3s0 proto dhcp metric 600 
   169.254.0.0/16 dev virbr0 scope link metric 1000 linkdown 
   192.168.1.0/24 dev wlp3s0 proto kernel scope link src 192.168.1.154 metric 
600 
   192.168.122.0/24 dev virbr0 proto kernel scope link src 192.168.122.1 
linkdown
  ProcEnviron:
   LANGUAGE=en_US
   PATH=(custom, no user)
   XDG_RUNTIME_DIR=
   LANG=en_US.UTF-8
   SHELL=/bin/bash
  Profile0Extensions: extensions.sqlite corrupt or missing
  Profile0IncompatibleExtensions: Unavailable (corrupt or non-existant 
compatibility.ini or extensions.sqlite)
  Profile0Locales: extensions.sqlite corrupt or missing
  Profile0PrefErrors: Unexpected character ',' before close parenthesis @ 
/usr/lib/firefox/omni.ja:greprefs.js:348
  Profile0PrefSources:
   /usr/lib/firefox/defaults/pref/all-ubuntumate.js
   prefs.js
  Profile0Themes: extensions.sqlite corrupt or missing
  Profiles:
   Profile1 (Default) - LastVersion=77.0/20200528194502 (Out of date)
   Profile0 - LastVersion=86.0/20210222142601 (In use)
  RunningIncompatibleAddons: False
  SourcePackage: firefox
  UpgradeStatus: Upgraded to hirsute on 2020-06-02 (270 days ago)
  dmi.bios.date: 08/07/2019
  dmi.bios.release: 2.82
  dmi.bios.vendor: LENOVO
  dmi.bios.version: G1ETC2WW (2.82 )
  dmi.board.asset.tag: Not Available
  dmi.board.name: 2347GBU
  dmi.board.vendor: LENOVO
  dmi.board.version: Not Defined
  dmi.chassis.asset.tag: No Asset Information
  dmi.chassis.type: 10
  dmi.chassis.vendor: LENOVO
  dmi.chassis.version: Not Available
  dmi.ec.firmware.release: 1.14
  dmi.modalias: 
dmi:bvnLENOVO:bvrG1ETC2WW(2.82):bd08/07/2019:br2.82:efr1.14:svnLENOVO:pn2347GBU:pvrThinkPadT430:rvnLENOVO:rn2347GBU:rvrNotDefined:cvnLENOVO:ct10:cvrNotAvailable:
  dmi.product.family: ThinkPad T430
  dmi.product.name: 2347GBU
  dmi.product.sku: LENOVO_MT_2347
  dmi.product.version: ThinkPad T430
  dmi.sys.vendor: LENOVO

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu-mate/+bug/1917183/+subscriptions

-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
Post to : touch-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


[Touch-packages] [Bug 1916931] [NEW] omshell returns inconsistent results or segfaults

2021-02-25 Thread Bill MacAllister
Public bug reported:

I have just built a Ubuntu 20.04 server and installed isc-dhcp-server
4.4.1 on it and I am seeing inconsistent returns from omshell. 
Initially omshell returns data as expected, but when I exit and re-enter 
omshell connections fail.

Here is the initial, working, session:

# omshell
> server localhost
> port 7911
> key omapi_key 
> connect
obj: 
> new failover-state
obj: failover-state
> set name = "dhcp-failover"
obj: failover-state
name = "dhcp-failover"
> open
obj: failover-state
name = "dhcp-failover"
partner-address = c0:9d:e9:76:e9:55:00:00
partner-port = 00:00:02:07
local-address = 10:9d:e9:76:e9:55:00:00
local-port = 00:00:02:07
max-outstanding-updates = 00:00:00:0a
mclt = 00:00:01:2c
load-balance-max-secs = 00:00:00:03
load-balance-hba =
ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:00:00:00:00:00:00:00:00:00:00:00:00:00:00:00:00
partner-state = 00:00:00:02
local-state = 00:00:00:02
partner-stos = 60:36:d0:68
local-stos = 60:36:8b:3b
hierarchy = 00:00:00:01
last-packet-sent = 00:00:00:00
last-timestamp-received = 00:00:00:00
skew = 00:00:00:00
max-response-delay = 00:00:00:3c
cur-unacked-updates = 00:00:00:00

Here is what I see when the connect fails.  Well, just hangs really.

# omshell
> server localhost
> port 7911
> key omapi_key 
> connect

And then I hit ctrl-c to break out and tried again:

# omshell
> server localhost
> port 7911
> key omapi_key 
> connect
Segmentation fault (core dumped)

Note, the peer to this server is still running Ubuntu 18.04 with
isc-dhcp-server 4.3.5.  Running the exact same commands on the peer
works reliably.  (They are using the same python script to drive
omshell.)  The DHCP server on the new system appears to be working 
just fine as reported by omshell on the peer and systemctl.

I was curious if the problem could be with the mis-matched versions
of isc-dhcp-server so I shutdown isc-dhcp-server on the 18.04 system
and get the same results.

I also tried using a python script with the pypureomapi module to
try and determine if the problem was in omshell or the server.  I 
got very similar results when I attempted to get information about
the failover state of the server.  Interestingly interrogating
the server about host information seems to work just fine.

This is a critical bug since I don't see how to fail over a DHCP
that is running the isc-dhcp-server on 20.04 without being able
to issue omapi commands.

I am attaching apport output to this bug report.

** Affects: isc-dhcp (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New

** Attachment added: "omapi-failures.apport"
   
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1916931/+attachment/5467107/+files/omapi-failures.apport

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to isc-dhcp in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1916931

Title:
  omshell returns inconsistent results or segfaults

Status in isc-dhcp package in Ubuntu:
  New

Bug description:
  I have just built a Ubuntu 20.04 server and installed isc-dhcp-server
  4.4.1 on it and I am seeing inconsistent returns from omshell. 
  Initially omshell returns data as expected, but when I exit and re-enter 
  omshell connections fail.

  Here is the initial, working, session:

  # omshell
  > server localhost
  > port 7911
  > key omapi_key 
  > connect
  obj: 
  > new failover-state
  obj: failover-state
  > set name = "dhcp-failover"
  obj: failover-state
  name = "dhcp-failover"
  > open
  obj: failover-state
  name = "dhcp-failover"
  partner-address = c0:9d:e9:76:e9:55:00:00
  partner-port = 00:00:02:07
  local-address = 10:9d:e9:76:e9:55:00:00
  local-port = 00:00:02:07
  max-outstanding-updates = 00:00:00:0a
  mclt = 00:00:01:2c
  load-balance-max-secs = 00:00:00:03
  load-balance-hba =
  
ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:00:00:00:00:00:00:00:00:00:00:00:00:00:00:00:00
  partner-state = 00:00:00:02
  local-state = 00:00:00:02
  partner-stos = 60:36:d0:68
  local-stos = 60:36:8b:3b
  hierarchy = 00:00:00:01
  last-packet-sent = 00:00:00:00
  last-timestamp-received = 00:00:00:00
  skew = 00:00:00:00
  max-response-delay = 00:00:00:3c
  cur-unacked-updates = 00:00:00:00

  Here is what I see when the connect fails.  Well, just hangs really.

  # omshell
  > server localhost
  > port 7911
  > key omapi_key 
  > connect

  And then I hit ctrl-c to break out and tried again:

  # omshell
  > server localhost
  > port 7911
  > key omapi_key 
  > connect
  Segmentation fault (core dumped)

  Note, the peer to this server is still running Ubuntu 18.04 with
  isc-dhcp-server 4.3.5.  Running the exact same commands on the peer
  works reliably.  (They are using the same python script to drive
  omshell.)  The DHCP server on the new system appears to be working 
  just fine as reported by omshell on the peer and systemctl.

  I was curious if the problem could be with the mis-matched versions
  of isc-dhcp-server so I shutdown isc-dhcp-server on the 

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1916341] [NEW] poppler-utils/pdfimages list function names the wrong color in output table

2021-02-20 Thread Bill Yikes
Public bug reported:

When running:

$ pdfimages -list grayscale-document.pdf

the output is:

```
   page   num  type   width height color comp bpc  enc interp  object ID x-ppi 
y-ppi size ratio
   

  1 0 image2556  3288  rgb 3   8  jpeg   no 7  0   301  
 300  200K 0.8%
  2 1 image2556  3288  rgb 3   8  jpeg   no12  0   301  
 300  275K 1.5%
  3 2 image2556  3288  rgb 3   8  jpeg   no17  0   301  
 300  395K 0.8%
  4 3 image2556  3288  rgb 3   8  jpeg   no22  0   301  
 300  583K 2.8%
  5 4 image2556  3288  rgb 3   8  jpeg   no27  0   301  
 300  317K 1.3%
...
```

"rgb" is incorrect, which is evident after running: 'pdfimages -all -f 1
-l 1 grayscale-document.pdf foo && identify -format "%[type]"
foo-000.jpg', which correctly outputs "Grayscale".

Strangely, when "pdfimages -list" is fed a bilevel document, it states
that every page has color "gray".

** Affects: poppler (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to poppler in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1916341

Title:
  poppler-utils/pdfimages list function names the wrong color in output
  table

Status in poppler package in Ubuntu:
  New

Bug description:
  When running:

  $ pdfimages -list grayscale-document.pdf

  the output is:

  ```
 page   num  type   width height color comp bpc  enc interp  object ID 
x-ppi y-ppi size ratio
 

1 0 image2556  3288  rgb 3   8  jpeg   no 7  0   
301   300  200K 0.8%
2 1 image2556  3288  rgb 3   8  jpeg   no12  0   
301   300  275K 1.5%
3 2 image2556  3288  rgb 3   8  jpeg   no17  0   
301   300  395K 0.8%
4 3 image2556  3288  rgb 3   8  jpeg   no22  0   
301   300  583K 2.8%
5 4 image2556  3288  rgb 3   8  jpeg   no27  0   
301   300  317K 1.3%
  ...
  ```

  "rgb" is incorrect, which is evident after running: 'pdfimages -all -f
  1 -l 1 grayscale-document.pdf foo && identify -format "%[type]"
  foo-000.jpg', which correctly outputs "Grayscale".

  Strangely, when "pdfimages -list" is fed a bilevel document, it states
  that every page has color "gray".

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/poppler/+bug/1916341/+subscriptions

-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
Post to : touch-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


[Touch-packages] [Bug 1873895] Re: Regression: block staircase display with side-by-side monitors of different pixel widths

2021-02-07 Thread Bill (franksmcb)
Some follow-up with users from the Ubuntu MATE Community forums show
that this is occurring on Focal and Groovy; with 5.4, 5.8, and 5.10
kernels.


Following is a list of hardware and graphics information from affected users:

System:
  Host: huppyryzen Kernel: 5.4.0-54-generic x86_64 bits: 64 
  Desktop: MATE 1.24.0 Distro: Ubuntu 20.04.1 LTS (Focal Fossa) 
Machine:
  Type: Desktop Mobo: ASUSTeK model: PRIME B350-PLUS v: Rev X.0x 
  serial:  UEFI: American Megatrends v: 5602 
  date: 07/14/2020 
Graphics:
  Device-1: AMD Vega 10 XL/XT [Radeon RX Vega 56/64] driver: amdgpu 
  v: kernel 
  Display: x11 server: X.Org 1.20.8 driver: amdgpu,ati 
  unloaded: fbdev,modesetting,vesa resolution: 3440x1440~60Hz 
  OpenGL: 
  renderer: Radeon RX Vega (VEGA10 DRM 3.35.0 5.4.0-54-generic LLVM 11.0.0) 
  v: 4.6 Mesa 20.3.0-rc2

System:
  Host: marptop Kernel: 5.4.0-54-generic x86_64 bits: 64 
  Desktop: MATE 1.24.0 Distro: Ubuntu 20.04.1 LTS (Focal Fossa) 
Machine:
  Type: Laptop System: HP product: HP Laptop 17-ca0xxx v: N/A 
  serial:  
  Mobo: HP model: 84D2 v: 91.17 serial:  UEFI: AMI 
  v: F.21 date: 11/15/2018 
Graphics:
  Device-1: AMD Raven Ridge [Radeon Vega Series / Radeon Vega Mobile Series] 
  driver: amdgpu v: kernel 
  Display: x11 server: X.Org 1.20.8 driver: amdgpu,ati 
  unloaded: fbdev,modesetting,vesa resolution: 1600x900~60Hz 
  OpenGL: renderer: AMD RAVEN (DRM 3.35.0 5.4.0-54-generic LLVM 10.0.0) 
  v: 4.6 Mesa 20.0.8

System:
Host: duck-laptop2 Kernel: 5.8.0-29-generic x86_64 bits: 64 Desktop: MATE 
1.24.1 
Distro: Ubuntu 20.10 (Groovy Gorilla) 
Machine:   
Type: Laptop System: HP product: HP Laptop 15-db0xxx v: 
Type1ProductConfigId serial:  
Mobo: HP model: 84AE v: 86.20 serial:  UEFI: 
Insyde v: F.10 date: 05/31/2018 
Graphics: 
Device-1: AMD Raven Ridge [Radeon Vega Series / Radeon Vega Mobile Series] 
driver: amdgpu v: kernel 
Device-2: Lite-On 1351 type: USB driver: uvcvideo 
Display: x11 server: X.Org 1.20.9 driver: amdgpu,ati unloaded: 
fbdev,modesetting,vesa resolution: 1920x1080~60Hz 
OpenGL: renderer: AMD RAVEN (DRM 3.38.0 5.8.0-29-generic LLVM 11.0.0) v: 
4.6 Mesa 20.2.1

System:
Host: jgjmate-ThinkPad-E595 Kernel: 5.8.0-32-generic x86_64 bits: 64
Desktop: MATE 1.24.1 Distro: Ubuntu 20.10 (Groovy Gorilla)
Machine:
Type: Laptop System: LENOVO product: 20NF0012US v: ThinkPad E595
serial: 
Mobo: LENOVO model: 20NF0012US serial: 
UEFI: LENOVO v: R11ET39W (1.19 ) date: 09/11/2020
Graphics:
Device-1: AMD Picasso driver: amdgpu v: kernel
Device-2: Acer SunplusIT Integrated Camera type: USB driver: uvcvideo
Display: x11 server: X.Org 1.20.9 driver: amdgpu,ati
unloaded: fbdev,modesetting,vesa resolution: 1920x1080~60Hz
OpenGL: renderer: AMD RAVEN (DRM 3.38.0 5.8.0-32-generic LLVM 11.0.0)
v: 4.6 Mesa 20.2.1

System:
Host:  Kernel: 5.4.0-58-generic x86_64 bits: 64
Desktop: MATE 1.24.0 Distro: Ubuntu 20.04.1 LTS (Focal Fossa)
Machine:
Type: Laptop System: HP product: HP Laptop 15-db0xxx
v: Type1ProductConfigId serial: 
Mobo: HP model: 84AC v: 85.26 serial: 
UEFI: Insyde v: F.22 date: 11/06/2019
Graphics:
Device-1: AMD Stoney [Radeon R2/R3/R4/R5 Graphics] driver: amdgpu
v: kernel
Display: x11 server: X.Org 1.20.8 driver: amdgpu,ati
unloaded: fbdev,modesetting,vesa resolution: 1366x768~60Hz
OpenGL: renderer: AMD STONEY (DRM 3.35.0 5.4.0-58-generic LLVM 10.0.0)
v: 4.5 Mesa 20.0.8

System:
Host: pc Kernel: 5.4.0-58-generic x86_64 bits: 64 Desktop: MATE 1.24.0 
Distro: Ubuntu 20.04.1 LTS (Focal Fossa) 
Machine:   
Type: Desktop Mobo: MSI model: B75MA-P45 (MS-7798) v: 1.0 serial: 
 
BIOS: American Megatrends v: 1.9 date: 09/30/2013 
Graphics:  
Device-1: Advanced Micro Devices [AMD/ATI] Navi 10 [Radeon RX 5600 OEM/5600 
XT / 5700/5700 XT] driver: amdgpu 
v: kernel 
Display: x11 server: X.Org 1.20.8 driver: amdgpu,ati unloaded: 
fbdev,modesetting,radeon,vesa 
resolution: 1366x768~60Hz 
OpenGL: renderer: AMD Radeon RX 5600 XT (NAVI10 DRM 3.38.0 5.4.0-58-generic 
LLVM 11.0.0) 
v: 4.6 Mesa 21.0.0-devel (git-6a34a68 2020-12-13 focal-oibaf-ppa)

System:
Host: ACER-xk2308 Kernel: 5.10.4-051004-generic x86_64 bits: 64 Desktop: 
MATE 1.24.0 
Distro: Ubuntu 20.04.1 LTS (Focal Fossa) 
Machine:   
Type: Desktop Mobo: MSI model: B75MA-P45 (MS-7798) v: 1.0 serial: 
 
BIOS: American Megatrends v: 1.9 date: 09/30/2013 
Graphics:  
Device-1: Advanced Micro Devices [AMD/ATI] Navi 10 [Radeon RX 5600 OEM/5600 
XT / 5700/5700 XT] driver: amdgpu 
v: kernel 
Display: x11 server: X.Org 1.20.8 driver: amdgpu,ati unloaded: 
fbdev,modesetting,radeon,vesa 
resolution: 1366x768~60Hz 
OpenGL: renderer: AMD Radeon RX 5600 XT (NAVI10 DRM 3.40.0 
5.10.4-051004-generic LLVM 11.0.0) 
v: 4.6 Mesa 21.0.0-devel (git-24dcdc3 2021-01-04 focal-oibaf-ppa)

System:
Host: ACER-xk2308 Kernel: 5.8.0-38-generic 

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1903199] Re: systemd version 237-3ubuntu10.43 causes 32 bit Lubuntu 18.04 login to fail

2020-11-06 Thread Bill Miller
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 1890394 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1890394

Sounds right, thanks! I was morally certain it would have been reported
previously, but I couldn't find it.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to systemd in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1903199

Title:
  systemd version 237-3ubuntu10.43 causes 32 bit Lubuntu 18.04 login to
  fail

Status in systemd package in Ubuntu:
  New

Bug description:
  After installing routine updates including systemd version
  237-3ubuntu10.43 this 32 bit Lubuntu 18.04 booted to a black screen
  with a blinking cursor.

  I booted to recovery mode and removed the systemd update. This gave me
  a normal boot.

  ProblemType: Bug
  DistroRelease: Ubuntu 18.04
  Package: systemd 237-3ubuntu10.38
  ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 5.4.0-52.57~18.04.1-generic 5.4.65
  Uname: Linux 5.4.0-52-generic i686
  NonfreeKernelModules: wl
  ApportVersion: 2.20.9-0ubuntu7.19
  Architecture: i386
  CurrentDesktop: LXDE
  Date: Thu Nov  5 13:20:12 2020
  InstallationDate: Installed on 2020-11-05 (0 days ago)
  InstallationMedia: Lubuntu 18.04.5 LTS "Bionic Beaver" - Release i386 
(20200806.1)
  MachineType: Hewlett-Packard Compaq Mini 110c-1100
  ProcKernelCmdLine: BOOT_IMAGE=/boot/vmlinuz-5.4.0-52-generic 
root=UUID=fe274718-dc90-49c2-90f4-fb2d29b46d89 ro recovery nomodeset 
dis_ucode_ldr
  SourcePackage: systemd
  UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install)
  dmi.bios.date: 01/12/2010
  dmi.bios.vendor: Hewlett-Packard
  dmi.bios.version: 308F0 Ver. F.19
  dmi.board.name: 308F
  dmi.board.vendor: Hewlett-Packard
  dmi.board.version: KBC Version 02.10
  dmi.chassis.asset.tag: CNU9424KL9
  dmi.chassis.type: 10
  dmi.chassis.vendor: Inventec
  dmi.modalias: 
dmi:bvnHewlett-Packard:bvr308F0Ver.F.19:bd01/12/2010:svnHewlett-Packard:pnCompaqMini110c-1100:pvr039411001C030:rvnHewlett-Packard:rn308F:rvrKBCVersion02.10:cvnInventec:ct10:cvr:
  dmi.product.family: 103C_5335KV
  dmi.product.name: Compaq Mini 110c-1100
  dmi.product.sku: VM146UA#ABA
  dmi.product.version: 039411001C030
  dmi.sys.vendor: Hewlett-Packard

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/systemd/+bug/1903199/+subscriptions

-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
Post to : touch-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


[Touch-packages] [Bug 1903199] [NEW] systemd version 237-3ubuntu10.43 causes 32 bit Lubuntu 18.04 login to fail

2020-11-05 Thread Bill Miller
Public bug reported:

After installing routine updates including systemd version
237-3ubuntu10.43 this 32 bit Lubuntu 18.04 booted to a black screen with
a blinking cursor.

I booted to recovery mode and removed the systemd update. This gave me a
normal boot.

ProblemType: Bug
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 18.04
Package: systemd 237-3ubuntu10.38
ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 5.4.0-52.57~18.04.1-generic 5.4.65
Uname: Linux 5.4.0-52-generic i686
NonfreeKernelModules: wl
ApportVersion: 2.20.9-0ubuntu7.19
Architecture: i386
CurrentDesktop: LXDE
Date: Thu Nov  5 13:20:12 2020
InstallationDate: Installed on 2020-11-05 (0 days ago)
InstallationMedia: Lubuntu 18.04.5 LTS "Bionic Beaver" - Release i386 
(20200806.1)
MachineType: Hewlett-Packard Compaq Mini 110c-1100
ProcKernelCmdLine: BOOT_IMAGE=/boot/vmlinuz-5.4.0-52-generic 
root=UUID=fe274718-dc90-49c2-90f4-fb2d29b46d89 ro recovery nomodeset 
dis_ucode_ldr
SourcePackage: systemd
UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install)
dmi.bios.date: 01/12/2010
dmi.bios.vendor: Hewlett-Packard
dmi.bios.version: 308F0 Ver. F.19
dmi.board.name: 308F
dmi.board.vendor: Hewlett-Packard
dmi.board.version: KBC Version 02.10
dmi.chassis.asset.tag: CNU9424KL9
dmi.chassis.type: 10
dmi.chassis.vendor: Inventec
dmi.modalias: 
dmi:bvnHewlett-Packard:bvr308F0Ver.F.19:bd01/12/2010:svnHewlett-Packard:pnCompaqMini110c-1100:pvr039411001C030:rvnHewlett-Packard:rn308F:rvrKBCVersion02.10:cvnInventec:ct10:cvr:
dmi.product.family: 103C_5335KV
dmi.product.name: Compaq Mini 110c-1100
dmi.product.sku: VM146UA#ABA
dmi.product.version: 039411001C030
dmi.sys.vendor: Hewlett-Packard

** Affects: systemd (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New


** Tags: apport-bug bionic i386

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to systemd in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1903199

Title:
  systemd version 237-3ubuntu10.43 causes 32 bit Lubuntu 18.04 login to
  fail

Status in systemd package in Ubuntu:
  New

Bug description:
  After installing routine updates including systemd version
  237-3ubuntu10.43 this 32 bit Lubuntu 18.04 booted to a black screen
  with a blinking cursor.

  I booted to recovery mode and removed the systemd update. This gave me
  a normal boot.

  ProblemType: Bug
  DistroRelease: Ubuntu 18.04
  Package: systemd 237-3ubuntu10.38
  ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 5.4.0-52.57~18.04.1-generic 5.4.65
  Uname: Linux 5.4.0-52-generic i686
  NonfreeKernelModules: wl
  ApportVersion: 2.20.9-0ubuntu7.19
  Architecture: i386
  CurrentDesktop: LXDE
  Date: Thu Nov  5 13:20:12 2020
  InstallationDate: Installed on 2020-11-05 (0 days ago)
  InstallationMedia: Lubuntu 18.04.5 LTS "Bionic Beaver" - Release i386 
(20200806.1)
  MachineType: Hewlett-Packard Compaq Mini 110c-1100
  ProcKernelCmdLine: BOOT_IMAGE=/boot/vmlinuz-5.4.0-52-generic 
root=UUID=fe274718-dc90-49c2-90f4-fb2d29b46d89 ro recovery nomodeset 
dis_ucode_ldr
  SourcePackage: systemd
  UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install)
  dmi.bios.date: 01/12/2010
  dmi.bios.vendor: Hewlett-Packard
  dmi.bios.version: 308F0 Ver. F.19
  dmi.board.name: 308F
  dmi.board.vendor: Hewlett-Packard
  dmi.board.version: KBC Version 02.10
  dmi.chassis.asset.tag: CNU9424KL9
  dmi.chassis.type: 10
  dmi.chassis.vendor: Inventec
  dmi.modalias: 
dmi:bvnHewlett-Packard:bvr308F0Ver.F.19:bd01/12/2010:svnHewlett-Packard:pnCompaqMini110c-1100:pvr039411001C030:rvnHewlett-Packard:rn308F:rvrKBCVersion02.10:cvnInventec:ct10:cvr:
  dmi.product.family: 103C_5335KV
  dmi.product.name: Compaq Mini 110c-1100
  dmi.product.sku: VM146UA#ABA
  dmi.product.version: 039411001C030
  dmi.sys.vendor: Hewlett-Packard

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/systemd/+bug/1903199/+subscriptions

-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
Post to : touch-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


[Touch-packages] [Bug 1897934] Re: [SRU][Intel HDA] The initial sound level is set to zero (muted)

2020-10-22 Thread Bill (franksmcb)
This is confirmed working correctly on Ubuntu MATE with 20201022 re-
spin.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to alsa-lib in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1897934

Title:
  [SRU][Intel HDA] The initial sound level is set to zero (muted)

Status in Release Notes for Ubuntu:
  New
Status in alsa-lib package in Ubuntu:
  Fix Released
Status in alsa-lib source package in Focal:
  Fix Committed
Status in alsa-lib source package in Groovy:
  Fix Released

Bug description:
  [Impact]
  Fail to run '/usr/sbin/alsactl restore' on the HDA-Intel machines, this
  results in the failure on setting the init mixer values for HDA sound
  card, and users experience the mute of audio after installing the 20.10.  

  [Fix]
  Backport a patch from the latest alsa-lib (v1.2.3+)

  [Test]
  Without the patched alsa-lib, rm ~/.config/pulse/*;sudo rm /var/lib/alsa/*;
  sudo sh -c "echo b > /proc/sysrq-trigger", after booting up, the audio is
  muted.

  Install the patched alsa-lib, rm ~/.config/pulse/*;sudo rm /var/lib/alsa/*;
  sudo sh -c "echo b > /proc/sysrq-trigger", after booting up, the audio is
  not muted.

  [Regression Potential]
  This could make the ucm audio fail to initialize, but this possibility is
  very low, since this patch is from upstream, and I tested on a ucm based
  machine, the audio is good.

  
  On boot into the live session - or on first install the sound level is muted.

  I have to use GNOME Control Center - Sounds to change to an
  appropriate level.  Once changed the level chosen is correctly
  retained between reboots.

  This appears to be a regression from 20.04 where the sound level was
  set to - I guess - 80% on the live-session/first install

  ProblemType: BugDistroRelease: Ubuntu 20.10
  Package: pulseaudio 1:13.99.1-1ubuntu11
  ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 5.8.0-20.21-generic 5.8.10
  Uname: Linux 5.8.0-20-generic x86_64
  NonfreeKernelModules: zfs zunicode zavl icp zcommon znvpair
  ApportVersion: 2.20.11-0ubuntu48
  Architecture: amd64
  AudioDevicesInUse:
   USERPID ACCESS COMMAND
   /dev/snd/controlC0:  ubuntu-budgie   5041 F pulseaudio
  CasperMD5CheckResult: pass
  CasperVersion: 1.452
  CurrentDesktop: Budgie:GNOME
  Date: Wed Sep 30 16:03:08 2020
  LiveMediaBuild: Ubuntu-Budgie 20.10 "Groovy Gorilla" - Beta amd64 (20200930)
  ProcEnviron:
   TERM=xterm-256color
   PATH=(custom, no user)
   XDG_RUNTIME_DIR=
   LANG=en_US.UTF-8
   SHELL=/bin/bashSourcePackage: pulseaudio
  UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install)
  dmi.bios.date: 02/15/2016
  dmi.bios.release: 15.31
  dmi.bios.vendor: Insyde
  dmi.bios.version: F.1F
  dmi.board.asset.tag: Type2 - Board Asset Tag
  dmi.board.name: 80BF
  dmi.board.vendor: HP
  dmi.board.version: 95.16
  dmi.chassis.asset.tag: Chassis Asset Tag
  dmi.chassis.type: 10
  dmi.chassis.vendor: HP
  dmi.chassis.version: Chassis Version
  dmi.ec.firmware.release: 95.22
  dmi.modalias: 
dmi:bvnInsyde:bvrF.1F:bd02/15/2016:br15.31:efr95.22:svnHP:pnHPNotebook:pvr:rvnHP:rn80BF:rvr95.16:cvnHP:ct10:cvrChassisVersion:
  dmi.product.family: 103C_5335KV G=N L=CON B=HP
  dmi.product.name: HP Notebook
  dmi.product.sku: N9S73EA#ABU
  dmi.sys.vendor: HP

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu-release-notes/+bug/1897934/+subscriptions

-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
Post to : touch-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


[Touch-packages] [Bug 1897934] Re: [HP 14-ac100na N9S73EA#ABU] The initial sound level is set to zero (mute)

2020-10-21 Thread Bill (franksmcb)
This breaks Screen Reader installs for Visually impaired users and
breaks testcase #1305

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to pulseaudio in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1897934

Title:
  [HP 14-ac100na N9S73EA#ABU] The initial sound level is set to zero
  (mute)

Status in alsa-driver package in Ubuntu:
  Confirmed
Status in pulseaudio package in Ubuntu:
  Confirmed

Bug description:
  On boot into the live session - or on first install the sound level is
  muted.

  I have to use GNOME Control Center - Sounds to change to an
  appropriate level.  Once changed the level chosen is correctly
  retained between reboots.

  This appears to be a regression from 18.04 where the sound level was
  set to - I guess - 80% on the live-session/first install

  ProblemType: Bug
  DistroRelease: Ubuntu 20.10
  Package: pulseaudio 1:13.99.1-1ubuntu11
  ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 5.8.0-20.21-generic 5.8.10
  Uname: Linux 5.8.0-20-generic x86_64
  NonfreeKernelModules: zfs zunicode zavl icp zcommon znvpair
  ApportVersion: 2.20.11-0ubuntu48
  Architecture: amd64
  AudioDevicesInUse:
   USERPID ACCESS COMMAND
   /dev/snd/controlC0:  ubuntu-budgie   5041 F pulseaudio
  CasperMD5CheckResult: pass
  CasperVersion: 1.452
  CurrentDesktop: Budgie:GNOME
  Date: Wed Sep 30 16:03:08 2020
  LiveMediaBuild: Ubuntu-Budgie 20.10 "Groovy Gorilla" - Beta amd64 (20200930)
  ProcEnviron:
   TERM=xterm-256color
   PATH=(custom, no user)
   XDG_RUNTIME_DIR=
   LANG=en_US.UTF-8
   SHELL=/bin/bash
  SourcePackage: pulseaudio
  UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install)
  dmi.bios.date: 02/15/2016
  dmi.bios.release: 15.31
  dmi.bios.vendor: Insyde
  dmi.bios.version: F.1F
  dmi.board.asset.tag: Type2 - Board Asset Tag
  dmi.board.name: 80BF
  dmi.board.vendor: HP
  dmi.board.version: 95.16
  dmi.chassis.asset.tag: Chassis Asset Tag
  dmi.chassis.type: 10
  dmi.chassis.vendor: HP
  dmi.chassis.version: Chassis Version
  dmi.ec.firmware.release: 95.22
  dmi.modalias: 
dmi:bvnInsyde:bvrF.1F:bd02/15/2016:br15.31:efr95.22:svnHP:pnHPNotebook:pvr:rvnHP:rn80BF:rvr95.16:cvnHP:ct10:cvrChassisVersion:
  dmi.product.family: 103C_5335KV G=N L=CON B=HP
  dmi.product.name: HP Notebook
  dmi.product.sku: N9S73EA#ABU
  dmi.sys.vendor: HP

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/alsa-driver/+bug/1897934/+subscriptions

-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
Post to : touch-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


[Touch-packages] [Bug 1897934] Re: [HP 14-ac100na N9S73EA#ABU] The initial sound level is set to zero (mute)

2020-10-21 Thread Bill (franksmcb)
This is occurring on 20.10 Ubuntu MATE 20201021.2

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to pulseaudio in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1897934

Title:
  [HP 14-ac100na N9S73EA#ABU] The initial sound level is set to zero
  (mute)

Status in alsa-driver package in Ubuntu:
  Confirmed
Status in pulseaudio package in Ubuntu:
  Confirmed

Bug description:
  On boot into the live session - or on first install the sound level is
  muted.

  I have to use GNOME Control Center - Sounds to change to an
  appropriate level.  Once changed the level chosen is correctly
  retained between reboots.

  This appears to be a regression from 18.04 where the sound level was
  set to - I guess - 80% on the live-session/first install

  ProblemType: Bug
  DistroRelease: Ubuntu 20.10
  Package: pulseaudio 1:13.99.1-1ubuntu11
  ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 5.8.0-20.21-generic 5.8.10
  Uname: Linux 5.8.0-20-generic x86_64
  NonfreeKernelModules: zfs zunicode zavl icp zcommon znvpair
  ApportVersion: 2.20.11-0ubuntu48
  Architecture: amd64
  AudioDevicesInUse:
   USERPID ACCESS COMMAND
   /dev/snd/controlC0:  ubuntu-budgie   5041 F pulseaudio
  CasperMD5CheckResult: pass
  CasperVersion: 1.452
  CurrentDesktop: Budgie:GNOME
  Date: Wed Sep 30 16:03:08 2020
  LiveMediaBuild: Ubuntu-Budgie 20.10 "Groovy Gorilla" - Beta amd64 (20200930)
  ProcEnviron:
   TERM=xterm-256color
   PATH=(custom, no user)
   XDG_RUNTIME_DIR=
   LANG=en_US.UTF-8
   SHELL=/bin/bash
  SourcePackage: pulseaudio
  UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install)
  dmi.bios.date: 02/15/2016
  dmi.bios.release: 15.31
  dmi.bios.vendor: Insyde
  dmi.bios.version: F.1F
  dmi.board.asset.tag: Type2 - Board Asset Tag
  dmi.board.name: 80BF
  dmi.board.vendor: HP
  dmi.board.version: 95.16
  dmi.chassis.asset.tag: Chassis Asset Tag
  dmi.chassis.type: 10
  dmi.chassis.vendor: HP
  dmi.chassis.version: Chassis Version
  dmi.ec.firmware.release: 95.22
  dmi.modalias: 
dmi:bvnInsyde:bvrF.1F:bd02/15/2016:br15.31:efr95.22:svnHP:pnHPNotebook:pvr:rvnHP:rn80BF:rvr95.16:cvnHP:ct10:cvrChassisVersion:
  dmi.product.family: 103C_5335KV G=N L=CON B=HP
  dmi.product.name: HP Notebook
  dmi.product.sku: N9S73EA#ABU
  dmi.sys.vendor: HP

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/alsa-driver/+bug/1897934/+subscriptions

-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
Post to : touch-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


[Touch-packages] [Bug 910272] Re: USB->Parallel adapter produces crappy device URI and CUPS "usb" backend cannot cope with it

2020-08-19 Thread Bill Yikes
Same problem for me.  I have an old parallel-only printer.  It has been
working with a dedicated printer server, but the printer server died and
the PC has no parallel port.  So I connected a USB-to-LPT cable.  As I
attach the cable /var/log/syslog shows:

parport0: fix this legacy no-device port driver!
lp0: using parport0 (polling)

There does not exist a /dev/usb/lp0.  I still set "DeviceURI
parallel:/dev/usb/lp0" since that is what the instructions still say
(https://wiki.ubuntu.com/DebuggingPrintingProblems#USB_-.3E_Parallel_adapter),
and indeed that fails.  I also tried "DeviceURI parallel:/dev/parport0"
and CUPS rejected it.  Then I tried "DeviceURI parallel:/dev/lp0".  CUPS
accepted it, I sent a test print, and it just sits on the job queue with
the msg "Printer not connected; will retry in 30 seconds".

# usb_printerid /dev/lp0
Error: Invalid argument: GET_DEVICE_ID on '/dev/lp0'
# usb_printerid /dev/parport0
Error: Invalid argument: GET_DEVICE_ID on '/dev/parport0'

At another moment, I got a different error:

# usb_printerid /dev/lp0
Error: Device or resource busy: can't open '/dev/lp0'

This is on Bionic.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to cups in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/910272

Title:
  USB->Parallel adapter produces crappy device URI and CUPS "usb"
  backend cannot cope with it

Status in cups package in Ubuntu:
  Fix Released
Status in cups source package in Oneiric:
  Won't Fix

Bug description:
  Parallel port dot matrix printer Panasonic KX-P2124 connected via usb-
  parallel cable to HP6600 PC; running Ubuntu 11.10 system located on
  external hard drive attached by usb.  Worked on Ubuntu version 8 using
  URI "parallel:/dev/usb/lp0".  Understand that usblp has been
  deprecated; replace with ???  Cups reports printer not connected.
  CUPS version is (from UbuntuSoftwareCenter) - "cups 1.5.0-8ubuntu6".

  #Researched existing bugs - lots of info - no results.  No "Help" menu
  found by selecting upper right located "Gear"/"Printers; could not
  find any "Wizard."

  Thank you for your assistance,
  nvsoar
  
  w8@w8-FJ463AAR-ABA-a6528p:~$ uname -a
  Linux w8-FJ463AAR-ABA-a6528p 3.0.0-15-generic #24-Ubuntu SMP Mon Dec 12 
15:25:25 UTC 2011 i686 i686 i386 GNU/Linux

  w8@w8-FJ463AAR-ABA-a6528p:~$ lsusb
  Bus 001 Device 001: ID 1d6b:0002 Linux Foundation 2.0 root hub
  Bus 002 Device 001: ID 1d6b:0001 Linux Foundation 1.1 root hub
  Bus 001 Device 002: ID 067b:3507 Prolific Technology, Inc. PL3507 ATAPI6 
Bridge
  Bus 001 Device 004: ID 058f:6377 Alcor Micro Corp. Multimedia Card Reader
  Bus 002 Device 002: ID 050d:0002 Belkin Components
  #Device immediately above is usb to parallel cable
   
  w8@w8-FJ463AAR-ABA-a6528p:~$ lsmod | grep lp
  lp 17455  0 
  parport40930  4 parport_pc,ppdev,uss720,lp

  w8@w8-FJ463AAR-ABA-a6528p:~$ lsmod | grep ppdev
  ppdev  12849  0 
  parport40930  4 parport_pc,ppdev,uss720,lp

  w8@w8-FJ463AAR-ABA-a6528p:~$ lsmod | grep parport_pc
  parport_pc 32114  0 
  parport40930  4 parport_pc,ppdev,uss720,lp

  w8@w8-FJ463AAR-ABA-a6528p:~$ ls -l /dev/usb/lp* /dev/bus/usb/*/*
  ls: cannot access /dev/usb/lp*: No such file or directory
  crw-rw-r-- 1 root root 189,   0 2011-12-30 15:04 /dev/bus/usb/001/001
  crw-rw-r-- 1 root root 189,   1 2011-12-30 15:04 /dev/bus/usb/001/002
  crw-rw-r-- 1 root root 189,   3 2011-12-30 15:04 /dev/bus/usb/001/004
  crw-rw-r-- 1 root root 189, 128 2011-12-30 15:04 /dev/bus/usb/002/001
  crw-rw-r-- 1 root lp   189, 129 2011-12-30 15:25 /dev/bus/usb/002/002

  w8@w8-FJ463AAR-ABA-a6528p:~$ dmesg | grep par
  [0.00] Booting paravirtualized kernel on bare hardware
  [0.00] vt handoff: transparent VT on vt#7
  [0.210399] hpet0: 3 comparators, 32-bit 25.00 MHz counter
  [   28.754567] uss720: protocols (eg. bitbang) over USS720 usb to parallel 
cables
  [   28.893725] type=1400 audit(1325286282.534:2): apparmor="STATUS" 
operation="profile_load" name="/sbin/dhclient" pid=705 comm="apparmor_parser"
  [   28.893736] type=1400 audit(1325286282.534:3): apparmor="STATUS" 
operation="profile_replace" name="/sbin/dhclient" pid=755 comm="apparmor_parser"
  [   28.894175] type=1400 audit(1325286282.534:4): apparmor="STATUS" 
operation="profile_load" name="/usr/lib/NetworkManager/nm-dhcp-client.action" 
pid=755 comm="apparmor_parser"
  [   28.894324] type=1400 audit(1325286282.534:5): apparmor="STATUS" 
operation="profile_replace" 
name="/usr/lib/NetworkManager/nm-dhcp-client.action" pid=705 
comm="apparmor_parser"
  [   28.894438] type=1400 audit(1325286282.534:6): apparmor="STATUS" 
operation="profile_load" name="/usr/lib/connman/scripts/dhclient-script" 
pid=755 comm="apparmor_parser"
  [   28.894592] type=1400 audit(1325286282.534:7): apparmor="STATUS" 
operation="profile_replace" 

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1890836] Re: udev rule read but "RUN" command is not executed

2020-08-08 Thread Bill Yikes
Bug report to improve debugging output:

https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/systemd/+bug/1890890

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to systemd in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1890836

Title:
  udev rule read but "RUN" command is not executed

Status in systemd package in Ubuntu:
  Invalid

Bug description:
  The following was introduced as
  "/etc/udev/rules.d/99-harvest_camera.rules":

  ACTION=="add", KERNEL=="sd*[!0-9]", ENV{ID_FS_UUID_ENC}=="C355-A42D",
  RUN+="/usr/bin/sudo -u bill /home/bill/scripts/harvest_camera.sh"

  When the device is attached, it gets mounted but the harvest_camera.sh
  script does not execute.  The udev_log=debug parameter is set in
  /etc/udev/udev.conf.  Verbosity was also maximized by running "udevadm
  control --log-priority=debug".  After running "udevadm monitor
  --environment --udev", the drive was attached.  The output shows a
  device being created (/dev/sda1) and the UUID in the rule matches.
  But the script simply never executes.  The /var/log/syslog file shows:

  "
  Reading rules file: /etc/udev/rules.d/99-harvest_camera.rules
  Successfully forked off 'n/a' as PID 2201.
  1-2.3: Worker [2201] is forced for rocessing SEQNUM=7973.
  "

  So the logs make it look as though the script was executed.  The
  script is simply a stub that does a "touch /tmp/IhaveExecuted" and a
  call to zenity to give a popup announcement.  But none of that happens
  (no popup and no new file in /tmp/).  With maximum verbosity, there is
  no way to further diagnose this.  Deeper detail is needed that shows
  which matching criteria in the rules is being tried and what the
  result is.

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/systemd/+bug/1890836/+subscriptions

-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
Post to : touch-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


[Touch-packages] [Bug 1890890] [NEW] more debugging verbosity for udev rules needed

2020-08-08 Thread Bill Yikes
Public bug reported:

I wrote a udev rule that would not trigger when expected.  I spent 2
days working on it, trying to understand what the problem was.  I
finally figured it out -- it was a matching problem:

https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/systemd/+bug/1890836

The most verbose output possible is with the log level set to "debug".
This level of logging does not show users what criteria is being checked
and what the result is.  So users are working in the dark.  We have to
guess what udev is doing.  And we're bad at it, because if we could
guess correctly we probably would have written the rule correctly in the
first place.

Consider procmail.  This is an application where users write rules that
contain matching criteria.  When Procmail doesn't work as expected, the
logs show in detail what criteria matches and what does not.  This is
what udev needs.

** Affects: systemd (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to systemd in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1890890

Title:
  more debugging verbosity for udev rules needed

Status in systemd package in Ubuntu:
  New

Bug description:
  I wrote a udev rule that would not trigger when expected.  I spent 2
  days working on it, trying to understand what the problem was.  I
  finally figured it out -- it was a matching problem:

  https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/systemd/+bug/1890836

  The most verbose output possible is with the log level set to "debug".
  This level of logging does not show users what criteria is being
  checked and what the result is.  So users are working in the dark.  We
  have to guess what udev is doing.  And we're bad at it, because if we
  could guess correctly we probably would have written the rule
  correctly in the first place.

  Consider procmail.  This is an application where users write rules
  that contain matching criteria.  When Procmail doesn't work as
  expected, the logs show in detail what criteria matches and what does
  not.  This is what udev needs.

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/systemd/+bug/1890890/+subscriptions

-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
Post to : touch-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


[Touch-packages] [Bug 1890836] Re: udev rule read but "RUN" command is not executed

2020-08-08 Thread Bill Yikes
PEBKAC

** Changed in: systemd (Ubuntu)
   Status: Incomplete => Invalid

** Changed in: systemd (Ubuntu)
 Assignee: (unassigned) => Bill Yikes (yik3s)

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to systemd in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1890836

Title:
  udev rule read but "RUN" command is not executed

Status in systemd package in Ubuntu:
  Invalid

Bug description:
  The following was introduced as
  "/etc/udev/rules.d/99-harvest_camera.rules":

  ACTION=="add", KERNEL=="sd*[!0-9]", ENV{ID_FS_UUID_ENC}=="C355-A42D",
  RUN+="/usr/bin/sudo -u bill /home/bill/scripts/harvest_camera.sh"

  When the device is attached, it gets mounted but the harvest_camera.sh
  script does not execute.  The udev_log=debug parameter is set in
  /etc/udev/udev.conf.  Verbosity was also maximized by running "udevadm
  control --log-priority=debug".  After running "udevadm monitor
  --environment --udev", the drive was attached.  The output shows a
  device being created (/dev/sda1) and the UUID in the rule matches.
  But the script simply never executes.  The /var/log/syslog file shows:

  "
  Reading rules file: /etc/udev/rules.d/99-harvest_camera.rules
  Successfully forked off 'n/a' as PID 2201.
  1-2.3: Worker [2201] is forced for rocessing SEQNUM=7973.
  "

  So the logs make it look as though the script was executed.  The
  script is simply a stub that does a "touch /tmp/IhaveExecuted" and a
  call to zenity to give a popup announcement.  But none of that happens
  (no popup and no new file in /tmp/).  With maximum verbosity, there is
  no way to further diagnose this.  Deeper detail is needed that shows
  which matching criteria in the rules is being tried and what the
  result is.

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/systemd/+bug/1890836/+subscriptions

-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
Post to : touch-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


[Touch-packages] [Bug 1890836] Re: udev rule read but "RUN" command is not executed

2020-08-08 Thread Bill Yikes
It turns out the problem arises out of cargo cult programming on my
part.  The bang in KERNEL=="sd*[!0-9]" is what I copied out of
stackexchange, and it's exactly what prevents the mount from matching.
I suspected that early on, but ruled it out because when the device
first connects it must connect as /dev/sda (as the partition table must
be read before there can be an sda1).  Now I'm figuring the sda gets
replaced with sda1 before it reaches my custom rule.

In any case, the bug is not as I reported.  I'm sorry this turned out to
be a non-bug and I'm sorry I wasted your time Mr. Streetman.  This can
be closed.

I may open a new bug report to improve the debug output, because we
shouldn't have to work in the dark and guess about what the matching
criteria is doing.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to systemd in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1890836

Title:
  udev rule read but "RUN" command is not executed

Status in systemd package in Ubuntu:
  Invalid

Bug description:
  The following was introduced as
  "/etc/udev/rules.d/99-harvest_camera.rules":

  ACTION=="add", KERNEL=="sd*[!0-9]", ENV{ID_FS_UUID_ENC}=="C355-A42D",
  RUN+="/usr/bin/sudo -u bill /home/bill/scripts/harvest_camera.sh"

  When the device is attached, it gets mounted but the harvest_camera.sh
  script does not execute.  The udev_log=debug parameter is set in
  /etc/udev/udev.conf.  Verbosity was also maximized by running "udevadm
  control --log-priority=debug".  After running "udevadm monitor
  --environment --udev", the drive was attached.  The output shows a
  device being created (/dev/sda1) and the UUID in the rule matches.
  But the script simply never executes.  The /var/log/syslog file shows:

  "
  Reading rules file: /etc/udev/rules.d/99-harvest_camera.rules
  Successfully forked off 'n/a' as PID 2201.
  1-2.3: Worker [2201] is forced for rocessing SEQNUM=7973.
  "

  So the logs make it look as though the script was executed.  The
  script is simply a stub that does a "touch /tmp/IhaveExecuted" and a
  call to zenity to give a popup announcement.  But none of that happens
  (no popup and no new file in /tmp/).  With maximum verbosity, there is
  no way to further diagnose this.  Deeper detail is needed that shows
  which matching criteria in the rules is being tried and what the
  result is.

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/systemd/+bug/1890836/+subscriptions

-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
Post to : touch-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


[Touch-packages] [Bug 1890836] Re: udev rule read but "RUN" command is not executed

2020-08-07 Thread Bill Yikes
It fails for me on two different systems:

* Ubuntu 20.04 (Focal)
* Linux Mint 19.2 (Tina, which is based on Bionic)

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to systemd in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1890836

Title:
  udev rule read but "RUN" command is not executed

Status in systemd package in Ubuntu:
  Incomplete

Bug description:
  The following was introduced as
  "/etc/udev/rules.d/99-harvest_camera.rules":

  ACTION=="add", KERNEL=="sd*[!0-9]", ENV{ID_FS_UUID_ENC}=="C355-A42D",
  RUN+="/usr/bin/sudo -u bill /home/bill/scripts/harvest_camera.sh"

  When the device is attached, it gets mounted but the harvest_camera.sh
  script does not execute.  The udev_log=debug parameter is set in
  /etc/udev/udev.conf.  Verbosity was also maximized by running "udevadm
  control --log-priority=debug".  After running "udevadm monitor
  --environment --udev", the drive was attached.  The output shows a
  device being created (/dev/sda1) and the UUID in the rule matches.
  But the script simply never executes.  The /var/log/syslog file shows:

  "
  Reading rules file: /etc/udev/rules.d/99-harvest_camera.rules
  Successfully forked off 'n/a' as PID 2201.
  1-2.3: Worker [2201] is forced for rocessing SEQNUM=7973.
  "

  So the logs make it look as though the script was executed.  The
  script is simply a stub that does a "touch /tmp/IhaveExecuted" and a
  call to zenity to give a popup announcement.  But none of that happens
  (no popup and no new file in /tmp/).  With maximum verbosity, there is
  no way to further diagnose this.  Deeper detail is needed that shows
  which matching criteria in the rules is being tried and what the
  result is.

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/systemd/+bug/1890836/+subscriptions

-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
Post to : touch-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


[Touch-packages] [Bug 1890836] [NEW] udev rule read but "RUN" command is not executed

2020-08-07 Thread Bill Yikes
Public bug reported:

The following was introduced as
"/etc/udev/rules.d/99-harvest_camera.rules":

ACTION=="add", KERNEL=="sd*[!0-9]", ENV{ID_FS_UUID_ENC}=="C355-A42D",
RUN+="/usr/bin/sudo -u bill /home/bill/scripts/harvest_camera.sh"

When the device is attached, it gets mounted but the harvest_camera.sh
script does not execute.  The udev_log=debug parameter is set in
/etc/udev/udev.conf.  Verbosity was also maximized by running "udevadm
control --log-priority=debug".  After running "udevadm monitor
--environment --udev", the drive was attached.  The output shows a
device being created (/dev/sda1) and the UUID in the rule matches.  But
the script simply never executes.  The /var/log/syslog file shows:

"
Reading rules file: /etc/udev/rules.d/99-harvest_camera.rules
Successfully forked off 'n/a' as PID 2201.
1-2.3: Worker [2201] is forced for rocessing SEQNUM=7973.
"

So the logs make it look as though the script was executed.  The script
is simply a stub that does a "touch /tmp/IhaveExecuted" and a call to
zenity to give a popup announcement.  But none of that happens (no popup
and no new file in /tmp/).  With maximum verbosity, there is no way to
further diagnose this.  Deeper detail is needed that shows which
matching criteria in the rules is being tried and what the result is.

** Affects: systemd (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to systemd in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1890836

Title:
  udev rule read but "RUN" command is not executed

Status in systemd package in Ubuntu:
  New

Bug description:
  The following was introduced as
  "/etc/udev/rules.d/99-harvest_camera.rules":

  ACTION=="add", KERNEL=="sd*[!0-9]", ENV{ID_FS_UUID_ENC}=="C355-A42D",
  RUN+="/usr/bin/sudo -u bill /home/bill/scripts/harvest_camera.sh"

  When the device is attached, it gets mounted but the harvest_camera.sh
  script does not execute.  The udev_log=debug parameter is set in
  /etc/udev/udev.conf.  Verbosity was also maximized by running "udevadm
  control --log-priority=debug".  After running "udevadm monitor
  --environment --udev", the drive was attached.  The output shows a
  device being created (/dev/sda1) and the UUID in the rule matches.
  But the script simply never executes.  The /var/log/syslog file shows:

  "
  Reading rules file: /etc/udev/rules.d/99-harvest_camera.rules
  Successfully forked off 'n/a' as PID 2201.
  1-2.3: Worker [2201] is forced for rocessing SEQNUM=7973.
  "

  So the logs make it look as though the script was executed.  The
  script is simply a stub that does a "touch /tmp/IhaveExecuted" and a
  call to zenity to give a popup announcement.  But none of that happens
  (no popup and no new file in /tmp/).  With maximum verbosity, there is
  no way to further diagnose this.  Deeper detail is needed that shows
  which matching criteria in the rules is being tried and what the
  result is.

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/systemd/+bug/1890836/+subscriptions

-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
Post to : touch-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


[Touch-packages] [Bug 1890520] Re: catastrophic bug with deluser command -- destroys large number of system files

2020-08-07 Thread Bill Yikes
Notice also there is a serious transparency problem.  The output only
shows files for which removal failed.  This acutely heightens the
destruction because it potentially destroyed *thousands* of files as I
sat there and let it run.  The tool gives no idea how what's being
destroyed.  The admin has to trust that their understanding of the scope
of removal is accurate.  In the absence of errors, an admin would let it
run through to the end, resulting in maximum damage.

This tool badly needs a --simulate option.  And regardless of
simulation, it should show what files are affected.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to adduser in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1890520

Title:
  catastrophic bug with deluser command -- destroys large number of
  system files

Status in adduser package in Ubuntu:
  New

Bug description:
  I installed rygel and created a specific rygel user to run it with (as
  directed by the docs). I then realized a specific user was not needed.
  To reverse my steps, I ran deluser which proceeded to delete lots of
  files that have nothing to do with the rygel user:

  root@host:~# adduser --home /home/rygel --disabled-password --disabled-login 
--gecos 'Rygel media server' rygel
  root@host:~# sudo su - rygel
  rygel@host:$ systemctl start rygel
  rygel@host:$ exit
  root@host:~# deluser --remove-home --remove-all-files rygel
  Looking for files to backup/remove ...
  /usr/sbin/deluser: Cannot handle special file /etc/systemd/system/mdm.service
  /usr/sbin/deluser: Cannot handle special file 
/etc/systemd/system/samba-ad-dc.service
  /usr/sbin/deluser: Cannot handle special file 
/etc/systemd/system/cgmanager.service
  /usr/sbin/deluser: Cannot handle special file 
/etc/systemd/system/cgproxy.service
  /usr/sbin/deluser: Cannot handle special file /dev/vcsa7
  /usr/sbin/deluser: Cannot handle special file /dev/vcsu7
  /usr/sbin/deluser: Cannot handle special file /dev/vcs7
  /usr/sbin/deluser: Cannot handle special file /dev/gpiochip0
  /usr/sbin/deluser: Cannot handle special file /dev/dvdrw
  /usr/sbin/deluser: Cannot handle special file /dev/dvd
  /usr/sbin/deluser: Cannot handle special file /dev/cdrw
  /usr/sbin/deluser: Cannot handle special file /dev/zfs
  /usr/sbin/deluser: Cannot handle special file /dev/vhost-vsock
  /usr/sbin/deluser: Cannot handle special file /dev/vhost-net
  /usr/sbin/deluser: Cannot handle special file /dev/uhid
  /usr/sbin/deluser: Cannot handle special file /dev/vhci
  /usr/sbin/deluser: Cannot handle special file /dev/userio
  /usr/sbin/deluser: Cannot handle special file /dev/nvram
  /usr/sbin/deluser: Cannot handle special file /dev/btrfs-control
  /usr/sbin/deluser: Cannot handle special file /dev/cuse
  /usr/sbin/deluser: Cannot handle special file /dev/autofs
  /usr/sbin/deluser: Cannot handle special file /dev/sde
  /usr/sbin/deluser: Cannot handle special file /dev/sdd
  /usr/sbin/deluser: Cannot handle special file /dev/sdc
  /usr/sbin/deluser: Cannot handle special file /dev/sdb
  /usr/sbin/deluser: Cannot handle special file /dev/sg5
  /usr/sbin/deluser: Cannot handle special file /dev/sg4
  /usr/sbin/deluser: Cannot handle special file /dev/sg3
  /usr/sbin/deluser: Cannot handle special file /dev/sg2
  /usr/sbin/deluser: Cannot handle special file /dev/vcsa6
  /usr/sbin/deluser: Cannot handle special file /dev/vcsu6
  /usr/sbin/deluser: Cannot handle special file /dev/vcs6
  /usr/sbin/deluser: Cannot handle special file /dev/vcsa5
  /usr/sbin/deluser: Cannot handle special file /dev/vcsu5
  /usr/sbin/deluser: Cannot handle special file /dev/vcs5
  /usr/sbin/deluser: Cannot handle special file /dev/vcsa4
  /usr/sbin/deluser: Cannot handle special file /dev/vcsu4
  /usr/sbin/deluser: Cannot handle special file /dev/vcs4
  /usr/sbin/deluser: Cannot handle special file /dev/vcsa3
  /usr/sbin/deluser: Cannot handle special file /dev/vcsu3
  /usr/sbin/deluser: Cannot handle special file /dev/vcs3
  /usr/sbin/deluser: Cannot handle special file /dev/vcsa2
  /usr/sbin/deluser: Cannot handle special file /dev/vcsu2
  /usr/sbin/deluser: Cannot handle special file /dev/vcs2
  /usr/sbin/deluser: Cannot handle special file /dev/hidraw2
  /usr/sbin/deluser: Cannot handle special file /dev/hidraw1
  /usr/sbin/deluser: Cannot handle special file /dev/cdrom
  /usr/sbin/deluser: Cannot handle special file /dev/hidraw0
  /usr/sbin/deluser: Cannot handle special file /dev/fb0
  /usr/sbin/deluser: Cannot handle special file /dev/i2c-5
  /usr/sbin/deluser: Cannot handle special file /dev/i2c-4
  /usr/sbin/deluser: Cannot handle special file /dev/i2c-3
  /usr/sbin/deluser: Cannot handle special file /dev/i2c-2
  /usr/sbin/deluser: Cannot handle special file /dev/i2c-1
  /usr/sbin/deluser: Cannot handle special file /dev/i2c-0
  /usr/sbin/deluser: Cannot handle special file /dev/rtc
  /usr/sbin/deluser: Cannot handle special file /dev/stderr
  /usr/sbin/deluser: Cannot handle 

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1890827] [NEW] udev and udevadm documentation missing

2020-08-07 Thread Bill Yikes
Public bug reported:

The man page for udevadm neglects to mention options which seem to only
be documented in stackexchange.  E.g.

udevadm monitor --environment

udevadm control --reload-rules

>From the man page, it's unclear what the difference is between /udevadm
trigger/ and /udevadm test/.  The description should tell the user
enough to work out which one they need to use for a certain situation.
E.g. I wrote a new rule and it's not triggering.  Is the trigger command
or the test command suitable for diagnosing the problem?

The documentation in /usr/share/doc/udev/ is strangely specific to some
esoteric network interface naming.  There is no basic description of
what udev's purpose is or what its capabilities are.  One of the most
notable tasks is to react to the insertion of USB drives, and there is
no mention of this.  The /etc/fstab table also has a role in mounting
USB drives, but there is no mention as to how udev works with
/etc/fstab.  I've found that if I remove a line in /etc/fstab and attach
the drive pertaining to that line, it gets mounted anyway.  If the fstab
file supercedes udev, then this should be mentioned in the
documentation.

** Affects: systemd (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to systemd in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1890827

Title:
  udev and udevadm documentation missing

Status in systemd package in Ubuntu:
  New

Bug description:
  The man page for udevadm neglects to mention options which seem to
  only be documented in stackexchange.  E.g.

  udevadm monitor --environment

  udevadm control --reload-rules

  From the man page, it's unclear what the difference is between
  /udevadm trigger/ and /udevadm test/.  The description should tell the
  user enough to work out which one they need to use for a certain
  situation.  E.g. I wrote a new rule and it's not triggering.  Is the
  trigger command or the test command suitable for diagnosing the
  problem?

  The documentation in /usr/share/doc/udev/ is strangely specific to
  some esoteric network interface naming.  There is no basic description
  of what udev's purpose is or what its capabilities are.  One of the
  most notable tasks is to react to the insertion of USB drives, and
  there is no mention of this.  The /etc/fstab table also has a role in
  mounting USB drives, but there is no mention as to how udev works with
  /etc/fstab.  I've found that if I remove a line in /etc/fstab and
  attach the drive pertaining to that line, it gets mounted anyway.  If
  the fstab file supercedes udev, then this should be mentioned in the
  documentation.

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/systemd/+bug/1890827/+subscriptions

-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
Post to : touch-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


[Touch-packages] [Bug 1890654] Re: udev service does not log

2020-08-07 Thread Bill Yikes
Sorry, i mean to say /var/log/syslog (not /var/log/system) shows the
device was attached.

The verbosity in /var/log/syslog increases when udev_log=debug, but
still no /var/log/udev.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to systemd in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1890654

Title:
  udev service does not log

Status in systemd package in Ubuntu:
  New

Bug description:
  By default udev is supposed to log to /var/log.  In Ubuntu 20 it is
  not logging.  Logging was then explicitly enabled by uncommenting this
  line in /etc/udev/udev.conf:

  "udev_log=info"

  After running "systemctl restart udev" and plugging in a USB drive,
  there is still no udev log in /var/log.  Yet /var/log/system shows
  that a device was in fact attached.

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/systemd/+bug/1890654/+subscriptions

-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
Post to : touch-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


[Touch-packages] [Bug 1844426] Re: Impossible to set up Livepatch on Ubuntu MATE

2020-05-31 Thread Bill (franksmcb)
** Also affects: software-properties (Ubuntu)
   Importance: Undecided
   Status: New

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to software-properties in
Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1844426

Title:
  Impossible to set up Livepatch on Ubuntu MATE

Status in Ubuntu MATE:
  Confirmed
Status in software-properties package in Ubuntu:
  New

Bug description:
  In Ubuntu MATEE 18.04, in the Software Properties window (available
  from Software Boutique > Preferences > Show Software Sources > Manage
  Repositories, among other places), there is a Livepatch tab. This tab
  says "To use Livepatch, you need to sign in" and provides a "Sign
  In..." button.

  This button launches an empty version of gnome-control-center with no
  icons in it.

  If one is technically adept, it is possible to do what (I think) that
  button is trying to do by launching g-c-c directly in a terminal and
  overriding the desktop, thus:

  env XDG_CURRENT_DESKTOP=GNOME gnome-control-center online-accounts

  This online accounts window permits attempting to add an Ubuntu One
  account. However, when one tries, a window pops up with a place to add
  one's Ubuntu One username and password, but the window has no Submit
  button; there is no way to actually initiate sign in.

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu-mate/+bug/1844426/+subscriptions

-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
Post to : touch-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


[Touch-packages] [Bug 1875944] Re: Lenovo Ideapad 130-15AST 20.04 distorted and unusable

2020-05-08 Thread Bill (franksmcb)
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 1873895 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1873895

** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 1873895
   Regression: block staircase display with side-by-side monitors of different 
pixel widths

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to libdrm in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1875944

Title:
  Lenovo Ideapad 130-15AST 20.04 distorted and unusable

Status in Ubuntu MATE:
  Confirmed
Status in libdrm package in Ubuntu:
  Confirmed
Status in linux package in Ubuntu:
  Confirmed

Bug description:
  Output of lshw here: https://pastebin.com/NMBigV4G

  Screenshot of the desktop here in the community forum: 
  
https://ubuntu-mate.community/t/lenovo-ideapad-20-04-upgrade-distorted-and-unusable/21617

  I'm not all that experienced at filing bug reports here so I have
  included the attachment of the photo found at the forum link.

  The picture in the community forum link is what the MATE 20.04 live USB boots 
to.
  I first upgraded from 18.04 using do-release-upgrade. The result looked like 
the photo as well.
  Then I reinstalled 18.04, upgraded to 19.10, which looked and performed 
normally. I then upgraded the 19.10 install to 20.04 with the same result as 
the photo.
  I also tried with a different flash drive just to rule that out.

  Then I made the live USB of the 20.04 image and booted it to what you see in 
the forum post.
  I made a live USB of both Stock Ubuntu and Kubuntu 20.04 and both worked just 
fine.

  Until I tried the other two flavors I was thinking it was system
  specific, but after they worked normally it seems to be a MATE
  specific issue with this system.

  It appears to be only a display problem. The DE is completely unusable with 
the mouse, but I can launch a terminal and run commands, although the terminal 
is just as distorted as the photo above, so you can't see what you are typing 
or the resulting output.
  --- 
  ProblemType: Bug
  ApportVersion: 2.20.9-0ubuntu7.14
  Architecture: amd64
  AudioDevicesInUse:
   USERPID ACCESS COMMAND
   /dev/snd/controlC1:  clay   1524 F pulseaudio
   /dev/snd/controlC0:  clay   1524 F pulseaudio
  BootLog: Error: [Errno 13] Permission denied: '/var/log/boot.log'
  CompositorRunning: None
  CurrentDesktop: MATE
  DistUpgraded: Fresh install
  DistroCodename: bionic
  DistroRelease: Ubuntu 18.04
  DistroVariant: ubuntu
  DkmsStatus: rtl8821ce, v5.5.2_34066.20200325, 5.3.0-46-generic, x86_64: 
installed
  GraphicsCard:
   Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. [AMD/ATI] Stoney [Radeon R2/R3/R4/R5 Graphics] 
[1002:98e4] (rev ea) (prog-if 00 [VGA controller])
 Subsystem: Lenovo Device [17aa:39f5]
  InstallationDate: Installed on 2020-04-27 (11 days ago)
  InstallationMedia: Ubuntu-MATE 18.04.4 LTS "Bionic Beaver" - Release amd64 
(20200203.1)
  MachineType: LENOVO 81H5
  Package: linux (not installed)
  ProcFB: 0 amdgpudrmfb
  ProcKernelCmdLine: BOOT_IMAGE=/boot/vmlinuz-5.3.0-46-generic 
root=UUID=bec09cbc-83af-49f6-8aeb-f02059977f4a ro quiet splash vt.handoff=1
  ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 5.3.0-46.38~18.04.1-generic 5.3.18
  RelatedPackageVersions:
   linux-restricted-modules-5.3.0-46-generic N/A
   linux-backports-modules-5.3.0-46-generic  N/A
   linux-firmware1.173.17
  Tags:  bionic ubuntu
  Uname: Linux 5.3.0-46-generic x86_64
  UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install)
  UserGroups: adm cdrom dip lpadmin plugdev sambashare sudo
  _MarkForUpload: True
  dmi.bios.date: 06/27/2018
  dmi.bios.vendor: LENOVO
  dmi.bios.version: 8ZCN15WW(V1.04)
  dmi.board.asset.tag: NO Asset Tag
  dmi.board.name: LNVNB161216
  dmi.board.vendor: LENOVO
  dmi.board.version: SDK0J40700 WIN
  dmi.chassis.asset.tag: NO Asset Tag
  dmi.chassis.type: 10
  dmi.chassis.vendor: LENOVO
  dmi.chassis.version: Lenovo ideapad 130-15AST
  dmi.modalias: 
dmi:bvnLENOVO:bvr8ZCN15WW(V1.04):bd06/27/2018:svnLENOVO:pn81H5:pvrLenovoideapad130-15AST:rvnLENOVO:rnLNVNB161216:rvrSDK0J40700WIN:cvnLENOVO:ct10:cvrLenovoideapad130-15AST:
  dmi.product.family: ideapad 130-15AST
  dmi.product.name: 81H5
  dmi.product.sku: LENOVO_MT_81H5_BU_idea_FM_ideapad 130-15AST
  dmi.product.version: Lenovo ideapad 130-15AST
  dmi.sys.vendor: LENOVO
  version.compiz: compiz 1:0.9.13.1+18.04.20180302-0ubuntu1
  version.libdrm2: libdrm2 2.4.99-1ubuntu1~18.04.2
  version.libgl1-mesa-dri: libgl1-mesa-dri 19.2.8-0ubuntu0~18.04.3
  version.libgl1-mesa-glx: libgl1-mesa-glx 19.2.8-0ubuntu0~18.04.3
  version.xserver-xorg-core: xserver-xorg-core N/A
  version.xserver-xorg-input-evdev: xserver-xorg-input-evdev N/A
  version.xserver-xorg-video-ati: xserver-xorg-video-ati N/A
  version.xserver-xorg-video-intel: xserver-xorg-video-intel N/A
  version.xserver-xorg-video-nouveau: xserver-xorg-video-nouveau N/A

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu-mate/+bug/1875944/+subscriptions

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1875892] [NEW] Display Interfaces Not Detected

2020-04-29 Thread Bill Zhong
Public bug reported:

My laptop (Lenovo ThinkPad P51) has 2 display interfaces. One mini-dp
and one HDMI. But none of them is shown in xrandr, and my external
display connected through mini-dp is not detected also.

When I used LiveCD, the external monitor works normally. The above
situation happens when my boot from SSD with the fully-installed system.

ProblemType: Bug
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 20.04
Package: xorg 1:7.7+19ubuntu14
ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 5.4.0-28.32-generic 5.4.30
Uname: Linux 5.4.0-28-generic x86_64
NonfreeKernelModules: nvidia_modeset nvidia
.proc.driver.nvidia.gpus..01.00.0: Error: [Errno 21] Is a directory: 
'/proc/driver/nvidia/gpus/:01:00.0'
.proc.driver.nvidia.registry: Binary: ""
.proc.driver.nvidia.suspend: suspend hibernate resume
.proc.driver.nvidia.suspend_depth: default modeset uvm
.proc.driver.nvidia.version:
 NVRM version: NVIDIA UNIX x86_64 Kernel Module  440.64  Fri Feb 21 01:17:26 
UTC 2020
 GCC version:
ApportVersion: 2.20.11-0ubuntu27
Architecture: amd64
BootLog: Error: [Errno 13] Permission denied: '/var/log/boot.log'
CasperMD5CheckResult: skip
CompositorRunning: None
CurrentDesktop: ubuntu:GNOME
Date: Wed Apr 29 21:37:28 2020
DistUpgraded: Fresh install
DistroCodename: focal
DistroVariant: ubuntu
ExtraDebuggingInterest: Yes
GraphicsCard:
 Intel Corporation HD Graphics P630 [8086:591d] (rev 04) (prog-if 00 [VGA 
controller])
   Subsystem: Lenovo HD Graphics P630 [17aa:224d]
   Subsystem: Lenovo GM206GLM [Quadro M2200 Mobile] [17aa:224d]
InstallationDate: Installed on 2020-04-29 (0 days ago)
InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 20.04 LTS "Focal Fossa" - Release amd64 (20200423)
MachineType: LENOVO 20HHCTO1WW
ProcKernelCmdLine: BOOT_IMAGE=/boot/vmlinuz-5.4.0-28-generic 
root=UUID=05a90498-4cfc-4877-8f08-b096eb36e91b ro quiet splash vt.handoff=7
SourcePackage: xorg
Symptom: display
UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install)
dmi.bios.date: 02/10/2020
dmi.bios.vendor: LENOVO
dmi.bios.version: N1UET77W (1.51 )
dmi.board.asset.tag: Not Available
dmi.board.name: 20HHCTO1WW
dmi.board.vendor: LENOVO
dmi.board.version: SDK0J40709 WIN
dmi.chassis.asset.tag: No Asset Information
dmi.chassis.type: 10
dmi.chassis.vendor: LENOVO
dmi.chassis.version: None
dmi.modalias: 
dmi:bvnLENOVO:bvrN1UET77W(1.51):bd02/10/2020:svnLENOVO:pn20HHCTO1WW:pvrThinkPadP51:rvnLENOVO:rn20HHCTO1WW:rvrSDK0J40709WIN:cvnLENOVO:ct10:cvrNone:
dmi.product.family: ThinkPad P51
dmi.product.name: 20HHCTO1WW
dmi.product.sku: LENOVO_MT_20HH_BU_Think_FM_ThinkPad P51
dmi.product.version: ThinkPad P51
dmi.sys.vendor: LENOVO
nvidia-settings:
 ERROR: Unable to load info from any available system
 
 
 ERROR: Unable to load info from any available system
version.compiz: compiz N/A
version.libdrm2: libdrm2 2.4.101-2
version.libgl1-mesa-dri: libgl1-mesa-dri 20.0.4-2ubuntu1
version.libgl1-mesa-glx: libgl1-mesa-glx N/A
version.nvidia-graphics-drivers: nvidia-graphics-drivers-* N/A
version.xserver-xorg-core: xserver-xorg-core 2:1.20.8-2ubuntu2
version.xserver-xorg-input-evdev: xserver-xorg-input-evdev N/A
version.xserver-xorg-video-ati: xserver-xorg-video-ati 1:19.1.0-1
version.xserver-xorg-video-intel: xserver-xorg-video-intel 
2:2.99.917+git20200226-1
version.xserver-xorg-video-nouveau: xserver-xorg-video-nouveau 1:1.0.16-1

** Affects: xorg (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New


** Tags: amd64 apport-bug focal ubuntu

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to xorg in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1875892

Title:
  Display Interfaces Not Detected

Status in xorg package in Ubuntu:
  New

Bug description:
  My laptop (Lenovo ThinkPad P51) has 2 display interfaces. One mini-dp
  and one HDMI. But none of them is shown in xrandr, and my external
  display connected through mini-dp is not detected also.

  When I used LiveCD, the external monitor works normally. The above
  situation happens when my boot from SSD with the fully-installed
  system.

  ProblemType: Bug
  DistroRelease: Ubuntu 20.04
  Package: xorg 1:7.7+19ubuntu14
  ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 5.4.0-28.32-generic 5.4.30
  Uname: Linux 5.4.0-28-generic x86_64
  NonfreeKernelModules: nvidia_modeset nvidia
  .proc.driver.nvidia.gpus..01.00.0: Error: [Errno 21] Is a directory: 
'/proc/driver/nvidia/gpus/:01:00.0'
  .proc.driver.nvidia.registry: Binary: ""
  .proc.driver.nvidia.suspend: suspend hibernate resume
  .proc.driver.nvidia.suspend_depth: default modeset uvm
  .proc.driver.nvidia.version:
   NVRM version: NVIDIA UNIX x86_64 Kernel Module  440.64  Fri Feb 21 01:17:26 
UTC 2020
   GCC version:
  ApportVersion: 2.20.11-0ubuntu27
  Architecture: amd64
  BootLog: Error: [Errno 13] Permission denied: '/var/log/boot.log'
  CasperMD5CheckResult: skip
  CompositorRunning: None
  CurrentDesktop: ubuntu:GNOME
  Date: Wed Apr 29 21:37:28 2020
  DistUpgraded: Fresh install
  DistroCodename: focal
  DistroVariant: ubuntu
  

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1873386] Re: nmcli error report on reboot after latest 20.04 updates

2020-04-17 Thread Bill (franksmcb)
Link to crash report from step #2:

https://errors.ubuntu.com/oops/88d785d4-80ba-11ea-a860-fa163ee63de6

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to network-manager in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1873386

Title:
  nmcli error report on reboot after latest 20.04 updates

Status in network-manager package in Ubuntu:
  Invalid

Bug description:
  Ubuntu MATE 20.04. Updated to latest updates and newest kernel, on
  20200416.

  Upon reboot system should error and error for nmcli.

  Crash file located in /var/crash

  ProblemType: Bug
  DistroRelease: Ubuntu 20.04
  Package: network-manager 1.22.10-1ubuntu1
  ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 5.4.0-24.28-generic 5.4.30
  Uname: Linux 5.4.0-24-generic x86_64
  ApportVersion: 2.20.11-0ubuntu27
  Architecture: amd64
  CasperMD5CheckResult: skip
  CurrentDesktop: MATE
  Date: Thu Apr 16 21:58:56 2020
  IfupdownConfig:
   # interfaces(5) file used by ifup(8) and ifdown(8)
   auto lo
   iface lo inet loopback
  InstallationDate: Installed on 2019-04-25 (357 days ago)
  InstallationMedia: Ubuntu-MATE 19.04 "Disco Dingo" - Release amd64 (20190416)
  IpRoute:
   default via 192.168.1.1 dev wlp2s0 proto dhcp metric 600 
   169.254.0.0/16 dev wlp2s0 scope link metric 1000 
   192.168.1.0/24 dev wlp2s0 proto kernel scope link src 192.168.1.159 metric 
600
  ProcEnviron:
   LANGUAGE=en_US
   PATH=(custom, no user)
   XDG_RUNTIME_DIR=
   LANG=en_US.UTF-8
   SHELL=/bin/bash
  SourcePackage: network-manager
  UpgradeStatus: Upgraded to focal on 2020-04-04 (12 days ago)
  nmcli-dev:
   DEVICE  TYPE  STATEIP4-CONNECTIVITY  IP6-CONNECTIVITY  DBUS-PATH 
 CONNECTION  CON-UUID   
   CON-PATH   
   wlp2s0  wifi  connectedfull  full  
/org/freedesktop/NetworkManager/Devices/3  Lothlorien  
41892137-acd0-46f2-8959-5f1e126489b0  
/org/freedesktop/NetworkManager/ActiveConnection/1 
   enp1s0  ethernet  unavailable  none  none  
/org/freedesktop/NetworkManager/Devices/2  --  --   
 -- 
   lo  loopback  unmanagedunknown   unknown   
/org/freedesktop/NetworkManager/Devices/1  --  --   
 --
  nmcli-nm:
   RUNNING  VERSION  STATE  STARTUP  CONNECTIVITY  NETWORKING  WIFI-HW  
WIFI WWAN-HW  WWAN
   running  1.22.10  connected  started  full  enabled enabled  
enabled  enabled  enabled

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/network-manager/+bug/1873386/+subscriptions

-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
Post to : touch-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


[Touch-packages] [Bug 1873386] [NEW] nmcli error report on reboot after latest 20.04 updates

2020-04-16 Thread Bill (franksmcb)
Public bug reported:

Ubuntu MATE 20.04. Updated to latest updates and newest kernel, on
20200416.

Upon reboot system should error and error for nmcli.

Crash file located in /var/crash

ProblemType: Bug
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 20.04
Package: network-manager 1.22.10-1ubuntu1
ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 5.4.0-24.28-generic 5.4.30
Uname: Linux 5.4.0-24-generic x86_64
ApportVersion: 2.20.11-0ubuntu27
Architecture: amd64
CasperMD5CheckResult: skip
CurrentDesktop: MATE
Date: Thu Apr 16 21:58:56 2020
IfupdownConfig:
 # interfaces(5) file used by ifup(8) and ifdown(8)
 auto lo
 iface lo inet loopback
InstallationDate: Installed on 2019-04-25 (357 days ago)
InstallationMedia: Ubuntu-MATE 19.04 "Disco Dingo" - Release amd64 (20190416)
IpRoute:
 default via 192.168.1.1 dev wlp2s0 proto dhcp metric 600 
 169.254.0.0/16 dev wlp2s0 scope link metric 1000 
 192.168.1.0/24 dev wlp2s0 proto kernel scope link src 192.168.1.159 metric 600
ProcEnviron:
 LANGUAGE=en_US
 PATH=(custom, no user)
 XDG_RUNTIME_DIR=
 LANG=en_US.UTF-8
 SHELL=/bin/bash
SourcePackage: network-manager
UpgradeStatus: Upgraded to focal on 2020-04-04 (12 days ago)
nmcli-dev:
 DEVICE  TYPE  STATEIP4-CONNECTIVITY  IP6-CONNECTIVITY  DBUS-PATH   
   CONNECTION  CON-UUID 
 CON-PATH   
 wlp2s0  wifi  connectedfull  full  
/org/freedesktop/NetworkManager/Devices/3  Lothlorien  
41892137-acd0-46f2-8959-5f1e126489b0  
/org/freedesktop/NetworkManager/ActiveConnection/1 
 enp1s0  ethernet  unavailable  none  none  
/org/freedesktop/NetworkManager/Devices/2  --  --   
 -- 
 lo  loopback  unmanagedunknown   unknown   
/org/freedesktop/NetworkManager/Devices/1  --  --   
 --
nmcli-nm:
 RUNNING  VERSION  STATE  STARTUP  CONNECTIVITY  NETWORKING  WIFI-HW  WIFI  
   WWAN-HW  WWAN
 running  1.22.10  connected  started  full  enabled enabled  
enabled  enabled  enabled

** Affects: network-manager (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New


** Tags: amd64 apport-bug focal

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to network-manager in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1873386

Title:
  nmcli error report on reboot after latest 20.04 updates

Status in network-manager package in Ubuntu:
  New

Bug description:
  Ubuntu MATE 20.04. Updated to latest updates and newest kernel, on
  20200416.

  Upon reboot system should error and error for nmcli.

  Crash file located in /var/crash

  ProblemType: Bug
  DistroRelease: Ubuntu 20.04
  Package: network-manager 1.22.10-1ubuntu1
  ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 5.4.0-24.28-generic 5.4.30
  Uname: Linux 5.4.0-24-generic x86_64
  ApportVersion: 2.20.11-0ubuntu27
  Architecture: amd64
  CasperMD5CheckResult: skip
  CurrentDesktop: MATE
  Date: Thu Apr 16 21:58:56 2020
  IfupdownConfig:
   # interfaces(5) file used by ifup(8) and ifdown(8)
   auto lo
   iface lo inet loopback
  InstallationDate: Installed on 2019-04-25 (357 days ago)
  InstallationMedia: Ubuntu-MATE 19.04 "Disco Dingo" - Release amd64 (20190416)
  IpRoute:
   default via 192.168.1.1 dev wlp2s0 proto dhcp metric 600 
   169.254.0.0/16 dev wlp2s0 scope link metric 1000 
   192.168.1.0/24 dev wlp2s0 proto kernel scope link src 192.168.1.159 metric 
600
  ProcEnviron:
   LANGUAGE=en_US
   PATH=(custom, no user)
   XDG_RUNTIME_DIR=
   LANG=en_US.UTF-8
   SHELL=/bin/bash
  SourcePackage: network-manager
  UpgradeStatus: Upgraded to focal on 2020-04-04 (12 days ago)
  nmcli-dev:
   DEVICE  TYPE  STATEIP4-CONNECTIVITY  IP6-CONNECTIVITY  DBUS-PATH 
 CONNECTION  CON-UUID   
   CON-PATH   
   wlp2s0  wifi  connectedfull  full  
/org/freedesktop/NetworkManager/Devices/3  Lothlorien  
41892137-acd0-46f2-8959-5f1e126489b0  
/org/freedesktop/NetworkManager/ActiveConnection/1 
   enp1s0  ethernet  unavailable  none  none  
/org/freedesktop/NetworkManager/Devices/2  --  --   
 -- 
   lo  loopback  unmanagedunknown   unknown   
/org/freedesktop/NetworkManager/Devices/1  --  --   
 --
  nmcli-nm:
   RUNNING  VERSION  STATE  STARTUP  CONNECTIVITY  NETWORKING  WIFI-HW  
WIFI WWAN-HW  WWAN
   running  1.22.10  connected  started  full  enabled enabled  
enabled  enabled  enabled

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/network-manager/+bug/1873386/+subscriptions

-- 
Mailing list: 

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1869923] [NEW] lightdm crashes on login to system 20.04

2020-03-31 Thread Bill (franksmcb)
Public bug reported:

Ubuntu MATE 20.04 updated 03312020

Hesitation on login to system
Login successful
System reports error and crash file located in /var/crash

ProblemType: Bug
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 20.04
Package: lightdm 1.30.0-0ubuntu3.1
ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 5.4.0-21.25-generic 5.4.27
Uname: Linux 5.4.0-21-generic x86_64
ApportVersion: 2.20.11-0ubuntu21
Architecture: amd64
CurrentDesktop: MATE
Date: Tue Mar 31 11:13:52 2020
InstallationDate: Installed on 2019-12-13 (109 days ago)
InstallationMedia: Ubuntu-MATE 20.04 LTS "Focal Fossa" - Alpha amd64 (20191213)
ProcEnviron:
 LANGUAGE=en_US
 PATH=(custom, no user)
 XDG_RUNTIME_DIR=
 LANG=en_US.UTF-8
 SHELL=/bin/bash
SourcePackage: lightdm
UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install)

** Affects: lightdm (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New


** Tags: amd64 apport-bug focal third-party-packages

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to lightdm in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1869923

Title:
  lightdm crashes on login to system 20.04

Status in lightdm package in Ubuntu:
  New

Bug description:
  Ubuntu MATE 20.04 updated 03312020

  Hesitation on login to system
  Login successful
  System reports error and crash file located in /var/crash

  ProblemType: Bug
  DistroRelease: Ubuntu 20.04
  Package: lightdm 1.30.0-0ubuntu3.1
  ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 5.4.0-21.25-generic 5.4.27
  Uname: Linux 5.4.0-21-generic x86_64
  ApportVersion: 2.20.11-0ubuntu21
  Architecture: amd64
  CurrentDesktop: MATE
  Date: Tue Mar 31 11:13:52 2020
  InstallationDate: Installed on 2019-12-13 (109 days ago)
  InstallationMedia: Ubuntu-MATE 20.04 LTS "Focal Fossa" - Alpha amd64 
(20191213)
  ProcEnviron:
   LANGUAGE=en_US
   PATH=(custom, no user)
   XDG_RUNTIME_DIR=
   LANG=en_US.UTF-8
   SHELL=/bin/bash
  SourcePackage: lightdm
  UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install)

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/lightdm/+bug/1869923/+subscriptions

-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
Post to : touch-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


[Touch-packages] [Bug 1869716] Re: Removing libpango1.0-0 broke Minecraft Launcher

2020-03-30 Thread Bill (franksmcb)
Tested with latest packages in proposed Ubuntu MATE and able to install
and use balena-etcher-electron.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to pango1.0 in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1869716

Title:
  Removing  libpango1.0-0  broke Minecraft Launcher

Status in pango1.0 package in Ubuntu:
  Fix Committed

Bug description:
  I just updated my machine, and when I did libpango1.0-0 was removed.
  This removed minecraft-launcher - the (very) popular launcher for
  Minecraft Java edition.

  I have reported this upstream, in case they can update their package
  https://bugs.mojang.com/browse/MCL-13512

  I am filing this bug so we can track it internally. I personally think
  this shouldn't have been done this late in the cycle, but there may
  well have been good reasons for it.

  As a result of the change though, it's now not possible to install
  Minecraft on Ubuntu 20.04.

  $ sudo apt install ./Minecraft\(1\).deb 
  Reading package lists... Done
  Building dependency tree   
  Reading state information... Done
  Note, selecting 'minecraft-launcher' instead of './Minecraft(1).deb'
  Some packages could not be installed. This may mean that you have
  requested an impossible situation or if you are using the unstable
  distribution that some required packages have not yet been created
  or been moved out of Incoming.
  The following information may help to resolve the situation:

  The following packages have unmet dependencies.
   minecraft-launcher : Depends: libpango1.0-0 (>= 1.14.0) but it is not 
installable
  E: Unable to correct problems, you have held broken packages.

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/pango1.0/+bug/1869716/+subscriptions

-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
Post to : touch-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


[Touch-packages] [Bug 1869787] Re: libpango1.0-0 has been removed from 20.04 and is not installable

2020-03-30 Thread Bill (franksmcb)
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 1869716 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1869716

https://packages.ubuntu.com/bionic/libpango1.0-0

** Package changed: ubuntu => pango1.0 (Ubuntu)

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to pango1.0 in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1869787

Title:
  libpango1.0-0 has been removed from 20.04 and is not installable

Status in pango1.0 package in Ubuntu:
  New

Bug description:
  Upon update on 30 March 2020 libpango1.0-0 was removed from the
  system.

  Package libpango1.0-0 is not available, but is referred to by another package.
  This may mean that the package is missing, has been obsoleted, or
  is only available from another source
  However the following packages replace it:
libpangox-1.0-0

  However applications such as balena-etcher require libpango1.0-0

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/pango1.0/+bug/1869787/+subscriptions

-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
Post to : touch-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


[Touch-packages] [Bug 1856054] Re: pulseaudio now depends on libsnapd-glib1 which recommends snapd

2020-03-11 Thread Bill Miller
Still stuck on version 7.5 3 months later.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to pulseaudio in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1856054

Title:
  pulseaudio now depends on libsnapd-glib1 which recommends snapd

Status in pulseaudio package in Ubuntu:
  Won't Fix

Bug description:
  The latest update for pulseaudio (1:11.1-1ubuntu7.5) in bionic now has
  libsnapd-glib1 as a dependency.

  This is complete and utter nonsense. I do not want cascading
  dependencies that have no business being installed on the systems I
  manage.

  Please rectify this at once.

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/pulseaudio/+bug/1856054/+subscriptions

-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
Post to : touch-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


[Touch-packages] [Bug 1863532] Re: Invoking "python" brings inappropriate response from command-not-found when python3 installed

2020-03-02 Thread Bill (franksmcb)
Using 20.04 current build still see:

$ python

Command 'python' not found, but can be installed with:

If I run sudo apt install python

Package python is not available, but is referred to by another package.
This may mean that the package is missing, has been obsoleted, or
is only available from another source
However the following packages replace it:
  python2-minimal:i386 python2:i386 python2-minimal python2 2to3

E: Package 'python' has no installation candidate

This has an effect on an upgrade to 20.04 of uninstalling any package
that depends on "python" for example slack-desktop.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to python3-defaults in
Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1863532

Title:
  Invoking "python" brings inappropriate response from command-not-found
  when python3 installed

Status in command-not-found package in Ubuntu:
  Triaged
Status in python3-defaults package in Ubuntu:
  Triaged
Status in command-not-found source package in Focal:
  Triaged
Status in python3-defaults source package in Focal:
  Triaged

Bug description:
  Ubuntu Mate 20.04 development release, upgraded from 19.10. I don't
  have python 2.7 installed, but have python 3 installed as per default.

  Please see ascii-cast at
  https://asciinema.org/a/SZR20NHz2FN6N6O1hj2Mqmnv8 .

  Running `python` brings up text from command-not-found which suggests
  installing `python3` as a solution to the missing command. `python3`
  is already installed, is a later version than the one indicated by
  command-not-found and does not supply a binary or symlink named
  `python`.

  $ apt policy python
  python:
Installed: (none)
Candidate: (none)
Version table:
   2.7.17-1 -1
  100 /var/lib/dpkg/status
  $ apt policy python3
  python3:
Installed: 3.8.0-3
Candidate: 3.8.0-3
Version table:
   *** 3.8.0-3 500
  500 http://gb.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu focal/main amd64 Packages
  100 /var/lib/dpkg/status
  $ apt policy command-not-found
  command-not-found:
Installed: 19.10.0
Candidate: 19.10.0
Version table:
   *** 19.10.0 500
  500 http://gb.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu focal/main amd64 Packages
  500 http://gb.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu focal/main i386 Packages
  100 /var/lib/dpkg/status

  I don't know whether this is a bug in python3 or command-not-found
  (the latter of which doesn't seem to have been updated for 20.04 yet).
  i don't know if it is intentional that `python3` will not provide a
  binary or symlink named `python`. if that is the case, the output of
  `command-not-found` should be updated to reflect that.

  ProblemType: Bug
  DistroRelease: Ubuntu 20.04
  Package: python3 3.8.0-3
  ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 5.4.0-14.17-generic 5.4.18
  Uname: Linux 5.4.0-14-generic x86_64
  NonfreeKernelModules: zfs zunicode zavl icp zcommon znvpair
  ApportVersion: 2.20.11-0ubuntu16
  Architecture: amd64
  CurrentDesktop: MATE
  Date: Mon Feb 17 01:35:16 2020
  InstallationDate: Installed on 2019-10-11 (128 days ago)
  InstallationMedia: Ubuntu-MATE 19.10 "Eoan Ermine" - Beta amd64 (20190926.2)
  SourcePackage: python3-defaults
  UpgradeStatus: Upgraded to focal on 2020-02-07 (10 days ago)

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/command-not-found/+bug/1863532/+subscriptions

-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
Post to : touch-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


[Touch-packages] [Bug 1863825] [NEW] 20.04 apt update of python 3.8 gives errors

2020-02-18 Thread Bill (franksmcb)
Public bug reported:

Run sudo apt dist-upgrade on 20.04 install.

Expected result:

python3 is updated without issue

Actual result:


After this operation, 1,114 kB disk space will be freed.
Do you want to continue? [Y/n] y
Get:1 http://us.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu focal/main amd64 python3-minimal 
amd64 3.8.0-3ubuntu1 [23.3 kB]
Get:2 http://us.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu focal/main amd64 python3 amd64 
3.8.0-3ubuntu1 [47.6 kB]
Get:3 http://us.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu focal/main amd64 libpython3-stdlib 
amd64 3.8.0-3ubuntu1 [6,872 B]
Get:4 http://us.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu focal/main amd64 libnewt0.52 amd64 
0.52.21-4ubuntu2 [41.1 kB]
Get:5 http://us.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu focal/main amd64 whiptail amd64 
0.52.21-4ubuntu2 [17.0 kB]
Get:6 http://us.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu focal/main amd64 gnome-disk-utility 
amd64 3.35.91-1ubuntu1 [186 kB]
Get:7 http://us.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu focal/universe amd64 onboard-data all 
1.4.1-2ubuntu7 [3,803 kB]
Get:8 http://us.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu focal/universe amd64 onboard amd64 
1.4.1-2ubuntu7 [351 kB] 
Get:9 http://us.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu focal/universe amd64 onboard-common 
all 1.4.1-2ubuntu7 [530 kB]
Get:10 http://us.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu focal/universe amd64 
python3-html5-parser amd64 0.4.9-3build1 [125 kB]   
 
Get:11 http://us.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu focal/main amd64 python3-renderpm 
amd64 3.5.34-1build1 [60.4 kB]  
Get:12 http://us.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu focal/main amd64 
python3-reportlab-accel amd64 3.5.34-1build1 [19.4 kB]  
 
Get:13 http://us.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu focal/main amd64 python3-reportlab 
all 3.5.34-1build1 [546 kB]
Get:14 http://us.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu focal/main amd64 python3-systemd 
amd64 234-3build2 [36.5 kB]  
Fetched 5,793 kB in 8s (694 kB/s)   
 
(Reading database ... 529746 files and directories currently installed.)
Preparing to unpack .../python3-minimal_3.8.0-3ubuntu1_amd64.deb ...
Unpacking python3-minimal (3.8.0-3ubuntu1) over (3.8.0-3) ...
Setting up python3-minimal (3.8.0-3ubuntu1) ...
/usr/lib/python3.8/subprocess.py:838: RuntimeWarning: line buffering 
(buffering=1) isn't supported in binary mode, the default buffer size will be 
use
d
  self.stdin = io.open(p2cwrite, 'wb', bufsize)
(Reading database ... 529746 files and directories currently installed.)
Preparing to unpack .../00-python3_3.8.0-3ubuntu1_amd64.deb ...
running python pre-rtupdate hooks for python3.8...
Unpacking python3 (3.8.0-3ubuntu1) over (3.8.0-3) ...
Preparing to unpack .../01-libpython3-stdlib_3.8.0-3ubuntu1_amd64.deb ...
Unpacking libpython3-stdlib:amd64 (3.8.0-3ubuntu1) over (3.8.0-3) ...
Preparing to unpack .../02-libnewt0.52_0.52.21-4ubuntu2_amd64.deb ...
Unpacking libnewt0.52:amd64 (0.52.21-4ubuntu2) over (0.52.21-4ubuntu1) ...
Preparing to unpack .../03-whiptail_0.52.21-4ubuntu2_amd64.deb ...
Unpacking whiptail (0.52.21-4ubuntu2) over (0.52.21-4ubuntu1) ...
Preparing to unpack .../04-gnome-disk-utility_3.35.91-1ubuntu1_amd64.deb ...
Unpacking gnome-disk-utility (3.35.91-1ubuntu1) over (3.35.2-1ubuntu1) ...
Preparing to unpack .../05-onboard-data_1.4.1-2ubuntu7_all.deb ...
Unpacking onboard-data (1.4.1-2ubuntu7) over (1.4.1-2ubuntu6) ...
Preparing to unpack .../06-onboard_1.4.1-2ubuntu7_amd64.deb ...
Unpacking onboard (1.4.1-2ubuntu7) over (1.4.1-2ubuntu6) ...
Preparing to unpack .../07-onboard-common_1.4.1-2ubuntu7_all.deb ...
Unpacking onboard-common (1.4.1-2ubuntu7) over (1.4.1-2ubuntu6) ...
Preparing to unpack .../08-python3-html5-parser_0.4.9-3build1_amd64.deb ...
Unpacking python3-html5-parser (0.4.9-3build1) over (0.4.9-3) ...
Preparing to unpack .../09-python3-renderpm_3.5.34-1build1_amd64.deb ...
Unpacking python3-renderpm:amd64 (3.5.34-1build1) over (3.5.34-1) ...
Preparing to unpack .../10-python3-reportlab-accel_3.5.34-1build1_amd64.deb ...
Unpacking python3-reportlab-accel:amd64 (3.5.34-1build1) over (3.5.34-1) ...
Preparing to unpack .../11-python3-reportlab_3.5.34-1build1_all.deb ...
Unpacking python3-reportlab (3.5.34-1build1) over (3.5.34-1) ...
Preparing to unpack .../12-python3-systemd_234-3build2_amd64.deb ...
Unpacking python3-systemd (234-3build2) over (234-3build1) ...
Setting up libnewt0.52:amd64 (0.52.21-4ubuntu2) ...
Setting up whiptail (0.52.21-4ubuntu2) ...
Setting up gnome-disk-utility (3.35.91-1ubuntu1) ...
Setting up libpython3-stdlib:amd64 (3.8.0-3ubuntu1) ...
Setting up python3 (3.8.0-3ubuntu1) ...
running python rtupdate hooks for python3.8...
/usr/lib/python3.8/subprocess.py:838: RuntimeWarning: line buffering 
(buffering=1) isn't supported in binary mode, the default buffer size will be 
use
d

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1856927] Re: totem crashed with SIGSEGV in build_flavored_key() from insert_key_mapping()

2020-02-18 Thread Bill (franksmcb)
@seb128 this is working correctly now after the grilo update.
Thanks

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to grilo-plugins in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1856927

Title:
  totem crashed with SIGSEGV in build_flavored_key() from
  insert_key_mapping()

Status in Grilo Plugins:
  Fix Released
Status in grilo-plugins package in Ubuntu:
  Fix Released
Status in totem package in Ubuntu:
  Invalid

Bug description:
  https://errors.ubuntu.com/problem/55095074fb3c3335c19f63f3c91d3a8231be2034

  ---

  Test case:
  Fresh 20.04 install, updated
  Open totem
  What happens: segfault

  Installing grilo-plugins-0.3-extra allows totem to open fine.

  ProblemType: Crash
  DistroRelease: Ubuntu 20.04
  Package: totem 3.34.1-2ubuntu1
  ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 5.3.0-24.26-generic 5.3.10
  Uname: Linux 5.3.0-24-generic x86_64
  ApportVersion: 2.20.11-0ubuntu14
  Architecture: amd64
  CrashCounter: 1
  CurrentDesktop: ubuntu:GNOME
  Date: Wed Dec 18 19:51:40 2019
  ExecutablePath: /usr/bin/totem
  ExecutableTimestamp: 1570435741
  InstallationDate: Installed on 2019-12-19 (0 days ago)
  InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 20.04 LTS "Focal Fossa" - Alpha amd64 (20191217)
  ProcCmdline: /usr/bin/totem --gapplication-service
  ProcCwd: /home/doug
  ProcEnviron:
   SHELL=/bin/bash
   XDG_RUNTIME_DIR=
   PATH=(custom, no user)
   LANG=en_US.UTF-8
  SegvAnalysis:
   Segfault happened at: 0x7f76b92f6dd6:movzbl (%rax),%eax
   PC (0x7f76b92f6dd6) ok
   source "(%rax)" (0x) not located in a known VMA region (needed 
readable region)!
   destination "%eax" ok
  SegvReason: reading NULL VMA
  Signal: 11
  SourcePackage: totem
  StacktraceTop:
   ?? () from /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/grilo-0.3/libgrltracker.so
   grl_tracker_setup_key_mappings () from 
/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/grilo-0.3/libgrltracker.so
   ?? () from /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/grilo-0.3/libgrltracker.so
   ?? () from /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/grilo-0.3/libgrltracker.so
   ?? () from /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libtracker-sparql-2.0.so.0
  Title: totem crashed with SIGSEGV in grl_tracker_setup_key_mappings()
  UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install)
  UserGroups: adm cdrom dip lpadmin lxd plugdev sambashare sudo
  XorgLog: Error: [Errno 2] No such file or directory: '/var/log/Xorg.0.log'
  separator:

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/grilo-plugins/+bug/1856927/+subscriptions

-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
Post to : touch-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


[Touch-packages] [Bug 1861191] Re: System hangs on graphical boot after kernel and nVidia upgrade

2020-01-28 Thread Bill (franksmcb)
nVidia driver 340.107 is available, however switching to that in
Software & Updates has resulted in some issues.

After Apply Changes, I am kicked to the Nouveau driver.

And I get an ErrorBrokenCount > 0

Trying to resolve with sudo apt --fix-broken install as recommended by
apt gives me:

The following additional packages will be installed:
  libnvidia-gl-390 libnvidia-gl-390:i386
The following NEW packages will be installed:
  libnvidia-gl-390 libnvidia-gl-390:i386
0 upgraded, 2 newly installed, 0 to remove and 0 not upgraded.
3 not fully installed or removed.
Need to get 0 B/29.1 MB of archives.
After this operation, 147 MB of additional disk space will be used.
Do you want to continue? [Y/n] y
(Reading database ... 482145 files and directories currently installed.)
Preparing to unpack .../libnvidia-gl-390_390.116-0ubuntu0.18.04.3_i386.deb ...
diversion of /usr/lib/i386-linux-gnu/libGL.so.1 to 
/usr/lib/i386-linux-gnu/libGL.so.1.distrib by nvidia-340
dpkg-divert: error: mismatch on package
  when removing 'diversion of /usr/lib/i386-linux-gnu/libGL.so.1 by 
libnvidia-gl-390'
  found 'diversion of /usr/lib/i386-linux-gnu/libGL.so.1 to 
/usr/lib/i386-linux-gnu/libGL.so.1.distrib by nvidia-340'
dpkg: error processing archive 
/var/cache/apt/archives/libnvidia-gl-390_390.116-0ubuntu0.18.04.3_i386.deb 
(--unpack):
 new libnvidia-gl-390:i386 package pre-installation script subprocess returned 
error exit status 2
Preparing to unpack .../libnvidia-gl-390_390.116-0ubuntu0.18.04.3_amd64.deb ...
diversion of /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libGL.so.1 to 
/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libGL.so.1.distrib by nvidia-340
dpkg-divert: error: mismatch on package
  when removing 'diversion of /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libGL.so.1 by 
libnvidia-gl-390'
  found 'diversion of /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libGL.so.1 to 
/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libGL.so.1.distrib by nvidia-340'
dpkg: error processing archive 
/var/cache/apt/archives/libnvidia-gl-390_390.116-0ubuntu0.18.04.3_amd64.deb 
(--unpack):
 new libnvidia-gl-390:amd64 package pre-installation script subprocess returned 
error exit status 2
Errors were encountered while processing:
 /var/cache/apt/archives/libnvidia-gl-390_390.116-0ubuntu0.18.04.3_i386.deb
 /var/cache/apt/archives/libnvidia-gl-390_390.116-0ubuntu0.18.04.3_amd64.deb
E: Sub-process /usr/bin/dpkg returned an error code (1)

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to xorg in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1861191

Title:
  System hangs on graphical boot after kernel and nVidia upgrade

Status in xorg package in Ubuntu:
  New

Bug description:
  System is Ubuntu MATE 18.04.3 T430 with nVidia

  On 27 Jan 2019 nvidia drivers were updated to 390.116 via apt upgrades with 
no issues.
  On 28 Jan 2919 kernel was updated to 5.3.0-28.30-18 via apt upgrades with no 
issues.
  System was rebooted today.

  Expected outcome:
  System reboots into desktop login

  Actual outcome:
  System gets to grub menu then hangs on black screen. TTYs are not responsive.

  This is reproducible and consistent. System will return to black
  screen and hung state.

  Workaround:
  Editing Grub and adding nouveau.modset=0 allows system to boot to GUI login.

  ProblemType: Bug
  DistroRelease: Ubuntu 18.04
  Package: xorg 1:7.7+19ubuntu7.1
  ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 5.3.0-28.30~18.04.1-generic 5.3.13
  Uname: Linux 5.3.0-28-generic x86_64
  NonfreeKernelModules: nvidia_modeset nvidia
  .proc.driver.nvidia.gpus..01.00.0: Error: [Errno 21] Is a directory: 
'/proc/driver/nvidia/gpus/:01:00.0'
  .proc.driver.nvidia.registry: Binary: ""
  .proc.driver.nvidia.version:
   NVRM version: NVIDIA UNIX x86_64 Kernel Module  390.116  Sun Jan 27 07:21:36 
PST 2019
   GCC version:  gcc version 7.4.0 (Ubuntu 7.4.0-1ubuntu1~18.04.1)
  ApportVersion: 2.20.9-0ubuntu7.9
  Architecture: amd64
  BootLog: Error: [Errno 13] Permission denied: '/var/log/boot.log'
  CompizPlugins: No value set for 
`/apps/compiz-1/general/screen0/options/active_plugins'
  CompositorRunning: None
  CurrentDesktop: MATE
  Date: Tue Jan 28 09:57:02 2020
  DistUpgraded: Fresh install
  DistroCodename: bionic
  DistroVariant: ubuntu
  DkmsStatus:
   nvidia, 390.116, 5.3.0-26-generic, x86_64: installed
   nvidia, 390.116, 5.3.0-28-generic, x86_64: installed
   virtualbox, 5.2.34, 5.0.0-37-generic, x86_64: installed
   virtualbox, 5.2.34, 5.3.0-26-generic, x86_64: installed
   virtualbox, 5.2.34, 5.3.0-28-generic, x86_64: installed
  ExtraDebuggingInterest: Yes
  GpuHangFrequency: This is the first time
  GraphicsCard:
   Intel Corporation 3rd Gen Core processor Graphics Controller [8086:0166] 
(rev 09) (prog-if 00 [VGA controller])
 Subsystem: Lenovo 3rd Gen Core processor Graphics Controller [17aa:21f4]
   NVIDIA Corporation GF108M [NVS 5400M] [10de:0def] (rev a1) (prog-if 00 [VGA 
controller])
 Subsystem: Lenovo GF108M [NVS 5400M] [17aa:21f4]
  InstallationDate: Installed on 2019-12-05 

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1861191] [NEW] System hangs on graphical boot after kernel and nVidia upgrade

2020-01-28 Thread Bill (franksmcb)
Public bug reported:

System is Ubuntu MATE 18.04.3 T430 with nVidia

On 27 Jan 2019 nvidia drivers were updated to 390.116 via apt upgrades with no 
issues.
On 28 Jan 2919 kernel was updated to 5.3.0-28.30-18 via apt upgrades with no 
issues.
System was rebooted today.

Expected outcome:
System reboots into desktop login

Actual outcome:
System gets to grub menu then hangs on black screen. TTYs are not responsive.

This is reproducible and consistent. System will return to black screen
and hung state.

Workaround:
Editing Grub and adding nouveau.modset=0 allows system to boot to GUI login.

ProblemType: Bug
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 18.04
Package: xorg 1:7.7+19ubuntu7.1
ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 5.3.0-28.30~18.04.1-generic 5.3.13
Uname: Linux 5.3.0-28-generic x86_64
NonfreeKernelModules: nvidia_modeset nvidia
.proc.driver.nvidia.gpus..01.00.0: Error: [Errno 21] Is a directory: 
'/proc/driver/nvidia/gpus/:01:00.0'
.proc.driver.nvidia.registry: Binary: ""
.proc.driver.nvidia.version:
 NVRM version: NVIDIA UNIX x86_64 Kernel Module  390.116  Sun Jan 27 07:21:36 
PST 2019
 GCC version:  gcc version 7.4.0 (Ubuntu 7.4.0-1ubuntu1~18.04.1)
ApportVersion: 2.20.9-0ubuntu7.9
Architecture: amd64
BootLog: Error: [Errno 13] Permission denied: '/var/log/boot.log'
CompizPlugins: No value set for 
`/apps/compiz-1/general/screen0/options/active_plugins'
CompositorRunning: None
CurrentDesktop: MATE
Date: Tue Jan 28 09:57:02 2020
DistUpgraded: Fresh install
DistroCodename: bionic
DistroVariant: ubuntu
DkmsStatus:
 nvidia, 390.116, 5.3.0-26-generic, x86_64: installed
 nvidia, 390.116, 5.3.0-28-generic, x86_64: installed
 virtualbox, 5.2.34, 5.0.0-37-generic, x86_64: installed
 virtualbox, 5.2.34, 5.3.0-26-generic, x86_64: installed
 virtualbox, 5.2.34, 5.3.0-28-generic, x86_64: installed
ExtraDebuggingInterest: Yes
GpuHangFrequency: This is the first time
GraphicsCard:
 Intel Corporation 3rd Gen Core processor Graphics Controller [8086:0166] (rev 
09) (prog-if 00 [VGA controller])
   Subsystem: Lenovo 3rd Gen Core processor Graphics Controller [17aa:21f4]
 NVIDIA Corporation GF108M [NVS 5400M] [10de:0def] (rev a1) (prog-if 00 [VGA 
controller])
   Subsystem: Lenovo GF108M [NVS 5400M] [17aa:21f4]
InstallationDate: Installed on 2019-12-05 (53 days ago)
InstallationMedia: Ubuntu-MATE 18.04.3 LTS "Bionic Beaver" - Release amd64 
(20190805)
MachineType: LENOVO 23445PU
ProcEnviron:
 LANGUAGE=en_US
 PATH=(custom, no user)
 XDG_RUNTIME_DIR=
 LANG=en_US.UTF-8
 SHELL=/bin/bash
ProcKernelCmdLine: BOOT_IMAGE=/boot/vmlinuz-5.3.0-28-generic 
root=UUID=5977afa2-a407-43bd-a6f4-e5dfd01188c0 ro quiet splash mouveau.modset=0
SourcePackage: xorg
Symptom: display
Title: Xorg freeze
UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install)
dmi.bios.date: 08/07/2019
dmi.bios.vendor: LENOVO
dmi.bios.version: G1ETC2WW (2.82 )
dmi.board.asset.tag: Not Available
dmi.board.name: 23445PU
dmi.board.vendor: LENOVO
dmi.board.version: Not Defined
dmi.chassis.asset.tag: No Asset Information
dmi.chassis.type: 10
dmi.chassis.vendor: LENOVO
dmi.chassis.version: Not Available
dmi.modalias: 
dmi:bvnLENOVO:bvrG1ETC2WW(2.82):bd08/07/2019:svnLENOVO:pn23445PU:pvrThinkPadT430:rvnLENOVO:rn23445PU:rvrNotDefined:cvnLENOVO:ct10:cvrNotAvailable:
dmi.product.family: ThinkPad T430
dmi.product.name: 23445PU
dmi.product.sku: LENOVO_MT_2344
dmi.product.version: ThinkPad T430
dmi.sys.vendor: LENOVO
version.compiz: compiz 1:0.9.13.1+18.04.20180302-0ubuntu1
version.libdrm2: libdrm2 2.4.99-1ubuntu1~18.04.1
version.libgl1-mesa-dri: libgl1-mesa-dri 19.2.1-1ubuntu1~18.04.1
version.libgl1-mesa-glx: libgl1-mesa-glx 19.2.1-1ubuntu1~18.04.1
version.nvidia-graphics-drivers: nvidia-graphics-drivers-* N/A
version.xserver-xorg-core: xserver-xorg-core N/A
version.xserver-xorg-input-evdev: xserver-xorg-input-evdev N/A
version.xserver-xorg-video-ati: xserver-xorg-video-ati N/A
version.xserver-xorg-video-intel: xserver-xorg-video-intel N/A
version.xserver-xorg-video-nouveau: xserver-xorg-video-nouveau N/A

** Affects: xorg (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New


** Tags: amd64 apport-bug bionic freeze ubuntu

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to xorg in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1861191

Title:
  System hangs on graphical boot after kernel and nVidia upgrade

Status in xorg package in Ubuntu:
  New

Bug description:
  System is Ubuntu MATE 18.04.3 T430 with nVidia

  On 27 Jan 2019 nvidia drivers were updated to 390.116 via apt upgrades with 
no issues.
  On 28 Jan 2919 kernel was updated to 5.3.0-28.30-18 via apt upgrades with no 
issues.
  System was rebooted today.

  Expected outcome:
  System reboots into desktop login

  Actual outcome:
  System gets to grub menu then hangs on black screen. TTYs are not responsive.

  This is reproducible and consistent. System will return to black
  screen and hung state.

  Workaround:
  Editing Grub and adding nouveau.modset=0 

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1847570] Re: PulseAudio automatically switches to HDMI sound output on login

2020-01-04 Thread Bill Duetschler
I have an Nvidia based video card that has 2 DVI outputs, an HDMI
output, a DisplayPort output.  I have 2 monitors that are plugged in to
the DVI outputs, and nothing plugged in to the HDMI or DP outputs.  And
still, XUbuntu insists on switching audio to the HDMI outputs that have
nothing plugged into them.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to pulseaudio in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1847570

Title:
  PulseAudio automatically switches to HDMI sound output on login

Status in PulseAudio:
  New
Status in pulseaudio package in Ubuntu:
  Fix Released
Status in pulseaudio source package in Eoan:
  Triaged
Status in pulseaudio source package in Focal:
  Fix Released

Bug description:
  [Impact]

  On my freshly installed eoan system I have two output devices:
  - HDMI/DisplayPort 2 - GK208 ...
  - Line Out - Family 17h ...

  When I login into the system pulseaudio always select the "wrong"
  one (HDMI) and I need to go to gnome-settings/Sound/Output Device
  and switch to "line out". This applies to every login/logout not
  just reboots.

  [Test Case]

  0. Plug in a monitor that supports HDMI audio (one that appears in
  your Settings>Sound)

  1. Log out and in again.

  Verify the default audio device in Settings is still speakers or
  headphones. Not the monitor's HDMI audio device.

  [Regression Potential]

  Low. The fix proposed just reverts to the same code used in PulseAudio
  12 and earlier. It has also been released and verified on focal
  already.

  [Workaround]

  Comment out:

  load-module module-switch-on-port-available
  load-module module-switch-on-connect

  from /etc/pulse/default.pa

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/pulseaudio/+bug/1847570/+subscriptions

-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
Post to : touch-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


[Touch-packages] [Bug 1850964] Re: Always explain why packages are held back in logs even without debugging enabled

2019-12-23 Thread Bill Miller
I'd prefer that the message be suppressed when the packages in question
are pinned. In this case, not updating them is the desired action, and
errors/warnings are not appropriate.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to unattended-upgrades in
Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1850964

Title:
  Always explain why packages are held back in logs even without
  debugging enabled

Status in unattended-upgrades package in Ubuntu:
  Confirmed
Status in unattended-upgrades package in Debian:
  Unknown

Bug description:
  [Impact]

   * Unattended-upgrades' log does not contain information about why
  held packages are kept back unless debugging is enabled. Users should
  be explained why packages are kept back to let them easily resolve the
  issues keeping the packages from being upgraded.

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/unattended-upgrades/+bug/1850964/+subscriptions

-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
Post to : touch-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


[Touch-packages] [Bug 1857345] [NEW] Misleading login message from unattended-upgrades

2019-12-23 Thread Bill Miller
Public bug reported:

A recent update to unattended-upgrades causes messages to be displayed
at login similar to this: "1 updates could not be installed
automatically. For more details,see /var/log/unattended-upgrades
/unattended-upgrades.log"

However, when the user has pinned/held a package, this is expected
behavior, and should not cause a warning or error. Additionally, in this
case, the the logfile that the user is directed to reference contains no
useful information.

Either the message should not be issued for pinned packages (preferred)
or the logfile that the user is directed to reference should contain
useful information.

ProblemType: Bug
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 18.04
Package: unattended-upgrades 1.1ubuntu1.18.04.13
ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 5.0.0-37.40~18.04.1-generic 5.0.21
Uname: Linux 5.0.0-37-generic x86_64
ApportVersion: 2.20.9-0ubuntu7.9
Architecture: amd64
CurrentDesktop: LXDE
Date: Mon Dec 23 07:16:09 2019
InstallationDate: Installed on 2016-08-27 (1213 days ago)
InstallationMedia: Lubuntu 16.04.1 LTS "Xenial Xerus" - Release amd64 (20160720)
PackageArchitecture: all
SourcePackage: unattended-upgrades
UpgradeStatus: Upgraded to bionic on 2018-08-04 (505 days ago)
modified.conffile..etc.apt.apt.conf.d.10periodic:
 APT::Periodic::Update-Package-Lists "1";
 APT::Periodic::Download-Upgradeable-Packages "1";
 APT::Periodic::AutocleanInterval "0";
 APT::Periodic::Unattended-Upgrade "1";
mtime.conffile..etc.apt.apt.conf.d.10periodic: 2017-08-18T18:55:52.439072

** Affects: unattended-upgrades (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New


** Tags: amd64 apport-bug bionic third-party-packages

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to unattended-upgrades in
Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1857345

Title:
  Misleading login message from unattended-upgrades

Status in unattended-upgrades package in Ubuntu:
  New

Bug description:
  A recent update to unattended-upgrades causes messages to be displayed
  at login similar to this: "1 updates could not be installed
  automatically. For more details,see /var/log/unattended-upgrades
  /unattended-upgrades.log"

  However, when the user has pinned/held a package, this is expected
  behavior, and should not cause a warning or error. Additionally, in
  this case, the the logfile that the user is directed to reference
  contains no useful information.

  Either the message should not be issued for pinned packages
  (preferred) or the logfile that the user is directed to reference
  should contain useful information.

  ProblemType: Bug
  DistroRelease: Ubuntu 18.04
  Package: unattended-upgrades 1.1ubuntu1.18.04.13
  ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 5.0.0-37.40~18.04.1-generic 5.0.21
  Uname: Linux 5.0.0-37-generic x86_64
  ApportVersion: 2.20.9-0ubuntu7.9
  Architecture: amd64
  CurrentDesktop: LXDE
  Date: Mon Dec 23 07:16:09 2019
  InstallationDate: Installed on 2016-08-27 (1213 days ago)
  InstallationMedia: Lubuntu 16.04.1 LTS "Xenial Xerus" - Release amd64 
(20160720)
  PackageArchitecture: all
  SourcePackage: unattended-upgrades
  UpgradeStatus: Upgraded to bionic on 2018-08-04 (505 days ago)
  modified.conffile..etc.apt.apt.conf.d.10periodic:
   APT::Periodic::Update-Package-Lists "1";
   APT::Periodic::Download-Upgradeable-Packages "1";
   APT::Periodic::AutocleanInterval "0";
   APT::Periodic::Unattended-Upgrade "1";
  mtime.conffile..etc.apt.apt.conf.d.10periodic: 2017-08-18T18:55:52.439072

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/unattended-upgrades/+bug/1857345/+subscriptions

-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
Post to : touch-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


[Touch-packages] [Bug 1605189] Re: Authentication is required for suspending the system

2019-11-09 Thread bill
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 1441460 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1441460

I'm using Mint 19.2 XFCE. I went with chrisc1073 setup and things seem
to be working fine. Thanks for the help.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to systemd in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1605189

Title:
  Authentication is required for suspending the system

Status in systemd package in Ubuntu:
  Confirmed

Bug description:
  Automatic suspend from the xfce power manager does not work, as a
  window opens and asks for my password. Well, if it wants to suspend
  the system after a given timeout, I cannot enter my password as I'm
  not in front of my system then. Once I'm able to enter my password it
  is too late to run the suspend action.

  The window asking for my password prints:

  Password: 

  Details

  Action: org.freedesktop.login1.suspend
  Vendor: The systemd project

  ProblemType: Bug
  DistroRelease: Ubuntu 16.04
  Package: systemd 229-4ubuntu7
  ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 4.4.0-31.50-generic 4.4.13
  Uname: Linux 4.4.0-31-generic x86_64
  ApportVersion: 2.20.1-0ubuntu2.1
  Architecture: amd64
  CurrentDesktop: XFCE
  Date: Thu Jul 21 13:13:12 2016
  EcryptfsInUse: Yes
  InstallationDate: Installed on 2014-08-17 (703 days ago)
  InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 14.04.1 LTS "Trusty Tahr" - Release amd64 
(20140722.2)
  MachineType: LENOVO 4236ML1
  ProcKernelCmdLine: BOOT_IMAGE=/vmlinuz-4.4.0-31-generic 
root=/dev/mapper/ubuntu--vg-root ro intel_pstate=enable
  SourcePackage: systemd
  SystemdDelta:
   [EXTENDED]   /lib/systemd/system/systemd-timesyncd.service → 
/lib/systemd/system/systemd-timesyncd.service.d/disable-with-time-daemon.conf
   [EXTENDED]   /lib/systemd/system/rc-local.service → 
/lib/systemd/system/rc-local.service.d/debian.conf
   
   2 overridden configuration files found.
  UpgradeStatus: Upgraded to xenial on 2016-05-28 (53 days ago)
  dmi.bios.date: 07/05/2013
  dmi.bios.vendor: LENOVO
  dmi.bios.version: 83ET76WW (1.46 )
  dmi.board.asset.tag: Not Available
  dmi.board.name: 4236ML1
  dmi.board.vendor: LENOVO
  dmi.board.version: Not Available
  dmi.chassis.asset.tag: No Asset Information
  dmi.chassis.type: 10
  dmi.chassis.vendor: LENOVO
  dmi.chassis.version: Not Available
  dmi.modalias: 
dmi:bvnLENOVO:bvr83ET76WW(1.46):bd07/05/2013:svnLENOVO:pn4236ML1:pvrThinkPadT420:rvnLENOVO:rn4236ML1:rvrNotAvailable:cvnLENOVO:ct10:cvrNotAvailable:
  dmi.product.name: 4236ML1
  dmi.product.version: ThinkPad T420
  dmi.sys.vendor: LENOVO

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/systemd/+bug/1605189/+subscriptions

-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
Post to : touch-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


[Touch-packages] [Bug 1832967] Re: /etc/resolv.conf does not include the local domain name

2019-06-17 Thread Bill
Thanks for the quick response.

Yesterday to fix the issue, I uninstalled the resolvconf package.  I
reinstalled it today, and now it is working with the correct "search"
domain.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to resolvconf in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1832967

Title:
  /etc/resolv.conf does not include the local domain name

Status in resolvconf package in Ubuntu:
  Incomplete

Bug description:
  When I rebooted my system after an update, `/etc/resolv.conf` was
  symlinked to `/run/resolvconf/resolv.conf`.  That file did not have my
  local domain name in the search even though it is supplied by the dhcp
  server.  The systemd resolv.conf file (in
  `/run/systemd/resolve/resolv.conf`) had the correct search
  information.

  Please ensure that the search is correctly added.

  ProblemType: Bug
  DistroRelease: Ubuntu 18.04
  Package: resolvconf 1.79ubuntu10.18.04.3
  ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 4.15.0-51.55-generic 4.15.18
  Uname: Linux 4.15.0-51-generic x86_64
  ApportVersion: 2.20.9-0ubuntu7.6
  Architecture: amd64
  Date: Sat Jun 15 22:18:05 2019
  PackageArchitecture: all
  ProcEnviron:
   TERM=xterm
   PATH=(custom, no user)
   XDG_RUNTIME_DIR=
   LANG=en_US.UTF-8
   SHELL=/bin/bash
  SourcePackage: resolvconf
  UpgradeStatus: Upgraded to bionic on 2018-08-21 (299 days ago)

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/resolvconf/+bug/1832967/+subscriptions

-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
Post to : touch-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


[Touch-packages] [Bug 1832967] [NEW] /etc/resolv.conf does not include the local domain name

2019-06-15 Thread Bill
Public bug reported:

When I rebooted my system after an update, `/etc/resolv.conf` was
symlinked to `/run/resolvconf/resolv.conf`.  That file did not have my
local domain name in the search even though it is supplied by the dhcp
server.  The systemd resolv.conf file (in
`/run/systemd/resolve/resolv.conf`) had the correct search information.

Please ensure that the search is correctly added.

This is also described here: https://askubuntu.com/a/1041631/326601

ProblemType: Bug
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 18.04
Package: resolvconf 1.79ubuntu10.18.04.3
ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 4.15.0-51.55-generic 4.15.18
Uname: Linux 4.15.0-51-generic x86_64
ApportVersion: 2.20.9-0ubuntu7.6
Architecture: amd64
Date: Sat Jun 15 22:18:05 2019
PackageArchitecture: all
ProcEnviron:
 TERM=xterm
 PATH=(custom, no user)
 XDG_RUNTIME_DIR=
 LANG=en_US.UTF-8
 SHELL=/bin/bash
SourcePackage: resolvconf
UpgradeStatus: Upgraded to bionic on 2018-08-21 (299 days ago)

** Affects: resolvconf (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New


** Tags: amd64 apport-bug bionic

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to resolvconf in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1832967

Title:
  /etc/resolv.conf does not include the local domain name

Status in resolvconf package in Ubuntu:
  New

Bug description:
  When I rebooted my system after an update, `/etc/resolv.conf` was
  symlinked to `/run/resolvconf/resolv.conf`.  That file did not have my
  local domain name in the search even though it is supplied by the dhcp
  server.  The systemd resolv.conf file (in
  `/run/systemd/resolve/resolv.conf`) had the correct search
  information.

  Please ensure that the search is correctly added.

  This is also described here: https://askubuntu.com/a/1041631/326601

  ProblemType: Bug
  DistroRelease: Ubuntu 18.04
  Package: resolvconf 1.79ubuntu10.18.04.3
  ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 4.15.0-51.55-generic 4.15.18
  Uname: Linux 4.15.0-51-generic x86_64
  ApportVersion: 2.20.9-0ubuntu7.6
  Architecture: amd64
  Date: Sat Jun 15 22:18:05 2019
  PackageArchitecture: all
  ProcEnviron:
   TERM=xterm
   PATH=(custom, no user)
   XDG_RUNTIME_DIR=
   LANG=en_US.UTF-8
   SHELL=/bin/bash
  SourcePackage: resolvconf
  UpgradeStatus: Upgraded to bionic on 2018-08-21 (299 days ago)

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/resolvconf/+bug/1832967/+subscriptions

-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
Post to : touch-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


[Touch-packages] [Bug 1813234] [NEW] package initramfs-tools 0.130ubuntu3.6 failed to install/upgrade: installed initramfs-tools package post-installation script subprocess returned error exit status

2019-01-24 Thread Bill Grau
Public bug reported:

crashes on start up of gui

ProblemType: Package
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 18.04
Package: initramfs-tools 0.130ubuntu3.6
ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 4.15.0-43.46-generic 4.15.18
Uname: Linux 4.15.0-43-generic x86_64
ApportVersion: 2.20.9-0ubuntu7.5
AptOrdering:
 udev:amd64: Install
 libudev1:amd64: Install
 libudev1:amd64: Configure
 NULL: ConfigurePending
Architecture: amd64
Date: Sun Jan 20 13:32:42 2019
ErrorMessage: installed initramfs-tools package post-installation script 
subprocess returned error exit status 1
InstallationDate: Installed on 2018-08-25 (152 days ago)
InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 18.04.1 LTS "Bionic Beaver" - Release amd64 (20180725)
PackageArchitecture: all
Python3Details: /usr/bin/python3.6, Python 3.6.7, python3-minimal, 3.6.7-1~18.04
PythonDetails: /usr/bin/python2.7, Python 2.7.15rc1, python-minimal, 
2.7.15~rc1-1
RelatedPackageVersions:
 dpkg 1.19.0.5ubuntu2.1
 apt  1.6.6
SourcePackage: initramfs-tools
Title: package initramfs-tools 0.130ubuntu3.6 failed to install/upgrade: 
installed initramfs-tools package post-installation script subprocess returned 
error exit status 1
UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install)

** Affects: initramfs-tools (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New


** Tags: amd64 apport-package bionic

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to initramfs-tools in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1813234

Title:
  package initramfs-tools 0.130ubuntu3.6 failed to install/upgrade:
  installed initramfs-tools package post-installation script subprocess
  returned error exit status 1

Status in initramfs-tools package in Ubuntu:
  New

Bug description:
  crashes on start up of gui

  ProblemType: Package
  DistroRelease: Ubuntu 18.04
  Package: initramfs-tools 0.130ubuntu3.6
  ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 4.15.0-43.46-generic 4.15.18
  Uname: Linux 4.15.0-43-generic x86_64
  ApportVersion: 2.20.9-0ubuntu7.5
  AptOrdering:
   udev:amd64: Install
   libudev1:amd64: Install
   libudev1:amd64: Configure
   NULL: ConfigurePending
  Architecture: amd64
  Date: Sun Jan 20 13:32:42 2019
  ErrorMessage: installed initramfs-tools package post-installation script 
subprocess returned error exit status 1
  InstallationDate: Installed on 2018-08-25 (152 days ago)
  InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 18.04.1 LTS "Bionic Beaver" - Release amd64 
(20180725)
  PackageArchitecture: all
  Python3Details: /usr/bin/python3.6, Python 3.6.7, python3-minimal, 
3.6.7-1~18.04
  PythonDetails: /usr/bin/python2.7, Python 2.7.15rc1, python-minimal, 
2.7.15~rc1-1
  RelatedPackageVersions:
   dpkg 1.19.0.5ubuntu2.1
   apt  1.6.6
  SourcePackage: initramfs-tools
  Title: package initramfs-tools 0.130ubuntu3.6 failed to install/upgrade: 
installed initramfs-tools package post-installation script subprocess returned 
error exit status 1
  UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install)

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/initramfs-tools/+bug/1813234/+subscriptions

-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
Post to : touch-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


[Touch-packages] [Bug 1718658] Re: ecryptfs-mount-private fails to initialize ecryptfs keys

2018-10-13 Thread Bill Dietrich
I see the messages (starting with "Could not find key with description")
on a fresh install of Linux Mint 19 Cinnamon.

Second line of kern.log says: "Linux version 4.15.0-36-generic
(buildd@lgw01-amd64-031) (gcc version 7.3.0 (Ubuntu 7.3.0-16ubuntu3))
#39-Ubuntu SMP Mon Sep 24 16:19:09 UTC 2018 (Ubuntu 4.15.0-36.39-generic
4.15.18)"

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to systemd in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1718658

Title:
  ecryptfs-mount-private fails to initialize ecryptfs keys

Status in ecryptfs-utils package in Ubuntu:
  Confirmed
Status in systemd package in Ubuntu:
  Confirmed

Bug description:
  ecryptfs-mount-private fails to mount the ecryptfs after the 1st
  reboot after creating the ecryptfs by ecryptfs-setup-private.

  After the unsucessful attempt dmesg contains:

  [ 1265.695388] Could not find key with description: []
  [ 1265.695393] process_request_key_err: No key
  [ 1265.695394] Could not find valid key in user session keyring for sig 
specified in mount option: []
  [ 1265.695395] One or more global auth toks could not properly register; rc = 
[-2]
  [ 1265.695396] Error parsing options; rc = [-2]

  Note: The correct key ID has been replaced in the "".

  I also accidentally found an workaround - just running ecrytpfs-
  manager and then the ecryptfs-mount-private (it does not ask for
  password for the second time and mounts the ecryptfs correctly):

  host:~$ ecryptfs-manager

  eCryptfs key management menu
  ---
1. Add passphrase key to keyring
2. Add public key to keyring
3. Generate new public/private keypair
4. Exit

  Make selection: 4
  host:~$ ls Private/
  Access-Your-Private-Data.desktop  README.txt
  host:~$ ecryptfs-mount-private 
  host:~$ ls Private/
  

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ecryptfs-utils/+bug/1718658/+subscriptions

-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
Post to : touch-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


[Touch-packages] [Bug 1563110]

2018-09-13 Thread bill.666
Hi is not merged on 4.16 / 4.17 / 4.18 / 4.19 for what ?


https://forum.manjaro.org/t/asus-e200ha-no-sound/44205/17
marcin19883 say : Kernel 4.19 RC1 Audio not working. No codec include. :(

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to alsa-driver in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1563110

Title:
  No sound on Asus e200ha, intel sst with cx2072x codec

Status in ALSA driver:
  Confirmed
Status in alsa-driver package in Ubuntu:
  Fix Released
Status in linux package in Ubuntu:
  Fix Released

Bug description:
  I've recently bought an Asus e200ha.
  Sound in this laptop doesn't work.
  The sound card is an intel sst with codec conexant cx2072x

  aplay -l:
  aplay: device_list:268: no soundcard found...
  in the sound setting there is a "Dummy output"
  --- 
  ApportVersion: 2.14.1-0ubuntu3.19
  Architecture: amd64
  AudioDevicesInUse: Error: command ['fuser', '-v', '/dev/snd/seq', 
'/dev/snd/timer'] failed with exit code 1:
  CurrentDesktop: XFCE
  DistroRelease: Ubuntu 14.04
  HibernationDevice: RESUME=UUID=7b77dc46-7d5b-4869-83dd-739980736c3a
  InstallationDate: Installed on 2016-03-28 (0 days ago)
  InstallationMedia: Linux Mint 17.3 "Rosa" - Release amd64 20160105
  Lsusb:
   Bus 002 Device 002: ID 0781:5583 SanDisk Corp. 
   Bus 002 Device 001: ID 1d6b:0003 Linux Foundation 3.0 root hub
   Bus 001 Device 003: ID 13d3:3496 IMC Networks 
   Bus 001 Device 002: ID 04f2:b54b Chicony Electronics Co., Ltd 
   Bus 001 Device 001: ID 1d6b:0002 Linux Foundation 2.0 root hub
  MachineType: ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC. E200HA
  Package: linux (not installed)
  ProcEnviron:
   TERM=xterm
   PATH=(custom, no user)
   XDG_RUNTIME_DIR=
   LANG=it_IT.UTF-8
   SHELL=/bin/bash
  ProcFB: 0 inteldrmfb
  ProcKernelCmdLine: BOOT_IMAGE=/boot/vmlinuz-3.19.0-32-generic 
root=UUID=50fb13c0-a8cd-441d-a38b-c0295c1b9a15 ro quiet splash vt.handoff=7
  ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 3.19.0-32.37~14.04.1-generic 3.19.8-ckt7
  RelatedPackageVersions:
   linux-restricted-modules-3.19.0-32-generic N/A
   linux-backports-modules-3.19.0-32-generic  N/A
   linux-firmware 1.127.16
  Tags:  rosa
  Uname: Linux 3.19.0-32-generic x86_64
  UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install)
  UserGroups: adm cdrom dip lpadmin plugdev sambashare sudo
  _MarkForUpload: True
  dmi.bios.date: 11/26/2015
  dmi.bios.vendor: American Megatrends Inc.
  dmi.bios.version: E200HA.203
  dmi.board.asset.tag: ATN12345678901234567
  dmi.board.name: E200HA
  dmi.board.vendor: ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC.
  dmi.board.version: 1.0
  dmi.chassis.asset.tag: ATN12345678901234567
  dmi.chassis.type: 10
  dmi.chassis.vendor: ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC.
  dmi.chassis.version: 1.0
  dmi.modalias: 
dmi:bvnAmericanMegatrendsInc.:bvrE200HA.203:bd11/26/2015:svnASUSTeKCOMPUTERINC.:pnE200HA:pvr1.0:rvnASUSTeKCOMPUTERINC.:rnE200HA:rvr1.0:cvnASUSTeKCOMPUTERINC.:ct10:cvr1.0:
  dmi.product.name: E200HA
  dmi.product.version: 1.0
  dmi.sys.vendor: ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC.

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/alsa-driver/+bug/1563110/+subscriptions

-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
Post to : touch-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


[Touch-packages] [Bug 1563110]

2018-09-13 Thread bill.666
(In reply to Caitlyn Martin from comment #98)
> It is fixed in the 4.18 kernel but more than an updated kerne is
> required.  You also need an up to date version of alsa and the new
> codec to be included when the kernel is compiled.  The problem with
> Manjaro is almost certainly a Manjaro problem, not an upstream
> problem.
> 
> On Sat, Jul 14, 2018 at 4:15 AM,  
> wrote:
> > https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=115531
> >
> > liberodark (bill@live.fr) changed:
> >
> >What|Removed |Added
> >
> ----
> >  CC|    |bill@live.fr
> >
> > --- Comment #97 from liberodark (bill@live.fr) ---
> > Hi,
> >
> > But not work on manjaro 17.1.11 !
> > The bug is not fixed is not integrated to kernel no ?
> > Have possibility to merge driver on kernel 4.18 ?
> >
> > https://www.manjaro.fr/forum/viewtopic.php?f=19=8812=asus
> > https://forum.manjaro.org/t/asus-e200ha-no-sound/44205/7
> > https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=200491
> >
> > Cordialy
> >
> > --
> > You are receiving this mail because:
> > You are on the CC list for the bug.

And have view is not officialy merged arch and majanro is not implicated
for this problem.

Please make a official merge to add audio codec.

Cordialy

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to alsa-driver in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1563110

Title:
  No sound on Asus e200ha, intel sst with cx2072x codec

Status in ALSA driver:
  Confirmed
Status in alsa-driver package in Ubuntu:
  Fix Released
Status in linux package in Ubuntu:
  Fix Released

Bug description:
  I've recently bought an Asus e200ha.
  Sound in this laptop doesn't work.
  The sound card is an intel sst with codec conexant cx2072x

  aplay -l:
  aplay: device_list:268: no soundcard found...
  in the sound setting there is a "Dummy output"
  --- 
  ApportVersion: 2.14.1-0ubuntu3.19
  Architecture: amd64
  AudioDevicesInUse: Error: command ['fuser', '-v', '/dev/snd/seq', 
'/dev/snd/timer'] failed with exit code 1:
  CurrentDesktop: XFCE
  DistroRelease: Ubuntu 14.04
  HibernationDevice: RESUME=UUID=7b77dc46-7d5b-4869-83dd-739980736c3a
  InstallationDate: Installed on 2016-03-28 (0 days ago)
  InstallationMedia: Linux Mint 17.3 "Rosa" - Release amd64 20160105
  Lsusb:
   Bus 002 Device 002: ID 0781:5583 SanDisk Corp. 
   Bus 002 Device 001: ID 1d6b:0003 Linux Foundation 3.0 root hub
   Bus 001 Device 003: ID 13d3:3496 IMC Networks 
   Bus 001 Device 002: ID 04f2:b54b Chicony Electronics Co., Ltd 
   Bus 001 Device 001: ID 1d6b:0002 Linux Foundation 2.0 root hub
  MachineType: ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC. E200HA
  Package: linux (not installed)
  ProcEnviron:
   TERM=xterm
   PATH=(custom, no user)
   XDG_RUNTIME_DIR=
   LANG=it_IT.UTF-8
   SHELL=/bin/bash
  ProcFB: 0 inteldrmfb
  ProcKernelCmdLine: BOOT_IMAGE=/boot/vmlinuz-3.19.0-32-generic 
root=UUID=50fb13c0-a8cd-441d-a38b-c0295c1b9a15 ro quiet splash vt.handoff=7
  ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 3.19.0-32.37~14.04.1-generic 3.19.8-ckt7
  RelatedPackageVersions:
   linux-restricted-modules-3.19.0-32-generic N/A
   linux-backports-modules-3.19.0-32-generic  N/A
   linux-firmware 1.127.16
  Tags:  rosa
  Uname: Linux 3.19.0-32-generic x86_64
  UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install)
  UserGroups: adm cdrom dip lpadmin plugdev sambashare sudo
  _MarkForUpload: True
  dmi.bios.date: 11/26/2015
  dmi.bios.vendor: American Megatrends Inc.
  dmi.bios.version: E200HA.203
  dmi.board.asset.tag: ATN12345678901234567
  dmi.board.name: E200HA
  dmi.board.vendor: ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC.
  dmi.board.version: 1.0
  dmi.chassis.asset.tag: ATN12345678901234567
  dmi.chassis.type: 10
  dmi.chassis.vendor: ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC.
  dmi.chassis.version: 1.0
  dmi.modalias: 
dmi:bvnAmericanMegatrendsInc.:bvrE200HA.203:bd11/26/2015:svnASUSTeKCOMPUTERINC.:pnE200HA:pvr1.0:rvnASUSTeKCOMPUTERINC.:rnE200HA:rvr1.0:cvnASUSTeKCOMPUTERINC.:ct10:cvr1.0:
  dmi.product.name: E200HA
  dmi.product.version: 1.0
  dmi.sys.vendor: ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC.

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/alsa-driver/+bug/1563110/+subscriptions

-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
Post to : touch-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


Re: [Touch-packages] [Bug 533974] Re: HP Officejet will not print in Bk only after udate

2018-08-05 Thread Bill
No problem. I really forgot about it.

Bill

On Sun, Aug 5, 2018 at 2:32 PM, gf <533...@bugs.launchpad.net> wrote:

> Thanks for the update, Bill. I am just trying to clear up these old
> tickets. I will close the report now.
> Have a great day!
> :)
> G
>
> Closed per reporter’s feedback.
>
> ** Changed in: cups (Ubuntu)
>Status: Incomplete => Invalid
>
> --
> You received this bug notification because you are subscribed to the bug
> report.
> https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/533974
>
> Title:
>   HP Officejet will not print in Bk only after udate
>
> To manage notifications about this bug go to:
> https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/cups/+bug/533974/+subscriptions
>

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to cups in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/533974

Title:
  HP Officejet will not print in Bk only after udate

Status in cups package in Ubuntu:
  Invalid

Bug description:
  I set my printer to black ink only at 300 DPI and have never had a
  problem until the last update.  Every time the printer will print in
  color draft mode only no matter what print settings are chosen.  600
  dpi black ink only, grey scale or what ever.  I deleted and
  reinstalled the printer and it still will only print color.  I am
  tired of wasting ink.

  I use 9.04 and would load 4.10 if the video drivers were stable.

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/cups/+bug/533974/+subscriptions

-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
Post to : touch-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


Re: [Touch-packages] [Bug 533974] Re: HP Officejet will not print in Bk only after udate

2018-08-05 Thread Bill
I have no idea if this was resolved. It's at least 10 years since I had an
HP-5400 I quit using Ubuntu when it became too much like Windoze. Other
distros work fine.

On Sun, Aug 5, 2018 at 10:19 AM, gf <533...@bugs.launchpad.net> wrote:

> Hello Bill,
> Thank you for submitting this bug and reporting a problem with cups and
> printing.  You made this bug report some time ago and Ubuntu has been
> updated since then.
>
> Could you confirm that this is no longer a problem and that we can close
> the ticket?
> If it is still a problem, are you still interested in finding a solution
> to this bug?
> If you are, could you let us know, and in the current version, run the
> following (only once):
> apport-collect BUGNUMBER
> and upload the updated logs and and any other logs that are relevant for
> this particular issue.
>
> Thank you again for helping make Ubuntu better.
> G
>
> ** Changed in: cups (Ubuntu)
>Status: New => Incomplete
>
> --
> You received this bug notification because you are subscribed to the bug
> report.
> https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/533974
>
> Title:
>   HP Officejet will not print in Bk only after udate
>
> To manage notifications about this bug go to:
> https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/cups/+bug/533974/+subscriptions
>

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to cups in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/533974

Title:
  HP Officejet will not print in Bk only after udate

Status in cups package in Ubuntu:
  Incomplete

Bug description:
  I set my printer to black ink only at 300 DPI and have never had a
  problem until the last update.  Every time the printer will print in
  color draft mode only no matter what print settings are chosen.  600
  dpi black ink only, grey scale or what ever.  I deleted and
  reinstalled the printer and it still will only print color.  I am
  tired of wasting ink.

  I use 9.04 and would load 4.10 if the video drivers were stable.

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/cups/+bug/533974/+subscriptions

-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
Post to : touch-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


[Touch-packages] [Bug 1549473] Re: ssh will not start at boot: systemctl status ssh -> output is listed as failed 255.

2018-07-11 Thread Bill Gradwohl
For anyone that's interested ---

I added the following to root's crontab:
   @reboot sleep 120 && /bin/systemctl restart sshd

That works for me to get sshd up AND listening

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to openssh in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1549473

Title:
  ssh will not start at boot:  systemctl status ssh -> output is listed
  as failed 255.

Status in portable OpenSSH:
  New
Status in openssh package in Ubuntu:
  Confirmed
Status in openssh package in Debian:
  New

Bug description:
  Using apt I have reinstalled and purged both ssh and openssh-server. 
  apt-get remove --purge ssh openssh-server
  reinstalled
  updated
  and on boot the ctl status is failed 255

  After much forum research and attempts to default solutions, the final word 
was that reinstall usually fixes this issue. 
  With the issue usually stemming from ssh service trying to start before 
network services are available.

  Currently I have no logs available with 
  journalctl -u sshd | tail -100

  I can provide info pertaining to this on request.

  ProblemType: Bug
  DistroRelease: Ubuntu 15.10
  Package: ssh 1:6.9p1-2ubuntu0.1
  ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 4.2.0-30.35-generic 4.2.8-ckt3
  Uname: Linux 4.2.0-30-generic x86_64
  ApportVersion: 2.19.1-0ubuntu5
  Architecture: amd64
  CurrentDesktop: LXDE
  Date: Wed Feb 24 14:27:55 2016
  InstallationDate: Installed on 2016-02-09 (15 days ago)
  InstallationMedia: Lubuntu 15.10 "Wily Werewolf" - Release amd64 (20151021)
  PackageArchitecture: all
  SourcePackage: openssh
  UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install)

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/openssh/+bug/1549473/+subscriptions

-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
Post to : touch-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


[Touch-packages] [Bug 1549473] Re: ssh will not start at boot: systemctl status ssh -> output is listed as failed 255.

2018-06-21 Thread Bill Gradwohl
Robie: If the service offers a mechanism to set a specific NIC to listen
on, then the service should make good on that offer when it's requested.
Doesn't that make sense to you?

All services that require a NIC to function should wait for that NIC to
come alive. Having a service start or attempt to start before what it
needs for life support is available makes no sense. Allowing a service
to start on a bogus IP address provides no "service". What's the point
of having a service technically up if it's deaf to traffic?

I can't see where this qualifies as a wishlist item. The service
advertises a feature and doesn't provide it. To me, that's a bug.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to openssh in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1549473

Title:
  ssh will not start at boot:  systemctl status ssh -> output is listed
  as failed 255.

Status in portable OpenSSH:
  New
Status in openssh package in Ubuntu:
  Confirmed
Status in openssh package in Debian:
  New

Bug description:
  Using apt I have reinstalled and purged both ssh and openssh-server. 
  apt-get remove --purge ssh openssh-server
  reinstalled
  updated
  and on boot the ctl status is failed 255

  After much forum research and attempts to default solutions, the final word 
was that reinstall usually fixes this issue. 
  With the issue usually stemming from ssh service trying to start before 
network services are available.

  Currently I have no logs available with 
  journalctl -u sshd | tail -100

  I can provide info pertaining to this on request.

  ProblemType: Bug
  DistroRelease: Ubuntu 15.10
  Package: ssh 1:6.9p1-2ubuntu0.1
  ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 4.2.0-30.35-generic 4.2.8-ckt3
  Uname: Linux 4.2.0-30-generic x86_64
  ApportVersion: 2.19.1-0ubuntu5
  Architecture: amd64
  CurrentDesktop: LXDE
  Date: Wed Feb 24 14:27:55 2016
  InstallationDate: Installed on 2016-02-09 (15 days ago)
  InstallationMedia: Lubuntu 15.10 "Wily Werewolf" - Release amd64 (20151021)
  PackageArchitecture: all
  SourcePackage: openssh
  UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install)

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/openssh/+bug/1549473/+subscriptions

-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
Post to : touch-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


[Touch-packages] [Bug 1549473] Re: ssh will not start at boot: systemctl status ssh -> output is listed as failed 255.

2018-06-15 Thread Bill Gradwohl
I created Bug 1774788 which is for rsyncd not starting at boot and was
provided with a fix by Andreas Hasenack that works. I tried using that
fix for ssh and it does not work.

Both services fail when an attempt is made to specify a particular NIC
via their respective config files. In the case of rsync, the fix was to
create the override.conf file containing:

[Unit]
After=network.target,network-online.target

via the command systemctl edit rsync.service

Using a similar procedure to create the override.conf file for ssh does
not fix the ssh daemon startup issue. I'm curious as to why that is.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to openssh in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1549473

Title:
  ssh will not start at boot:  systemctl status ssh -> output is listed
  as failed 255.

Status in portable OpenSSH:
  New
Status in openssh package in Ubuntu:
  Confirmed
Status in openssh package in Debian:
  New

Bug description:
  Using apt I have reinstalled and purged both ssh and openssh-server. 
  apt-get remove --purge ssh openssh-server
  reinstalled
  updated
  and on boot the ctl status is failed 255

  After much forum research and attempts to default solutions, the final word 
was that reinstall usually fixes this issue. 
  With the issue usually stemming from ssh service trying to start before 
network services are available.

  Currently I have no logs available with 
  journalctl -u sshd | tail -100

  I can provide info pertaining to this on request.

  ProblemType: Bug
  DistroRelease: Ubuntu 15.10
  Package: ssh 1:6.9p1-2ubuntu0.1
  ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 4.2.0-30.35-generic 4.2.8-ckt3
  Uname: Linux 4.2.0-30-generic x86_64
  ApportVersion: 2.19.1-0ubuntu5
  Architecture: amd64
  CurrentDesktop: LXDE
  Date: Wed Feb 24 14:27:55 2016
  InstallationDate: Installed on 2016-02-09 (15 days ago)
  InstallationMedia: Lubuntu 15.10 "Wily Werewolf" - Release amd64 (20151021)
  PackageArchitecture: all
  SourcePackage: openssh
  UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install)

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/openssh/+bug/1549473/+subscriptions

-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
Post to : touch-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


[Touch-packages] [Bug 1776329] [NEW] apport-cli and cowbuilder fail with cert and keyring errors

2018-06-11 Thread Bill MacAllister
Public bug reported:

Description: Ubuntu 18.04 LTS
Release: 18.04
ubuntu-keyring:  Installed: 2018.02.28
apport:  Installed: 2.20.9-0ubuntu7.2
cowbuilder:  Installed: 0.86


On a bionic system when attempting to report what I suspect is a bug in 
ubuntu-keying I got the following error

start capture-
$ apport-cli ubuntu-keyring

*** Collecting problem information

The collected information can be sent to the developers to improve the
application. This might take a few minutes.
.

*** Send problem report to the developers?

After the problem report has been sent, please fill out the form in the
automatically opened web browser.

What would you like to do? Your options are:
  S: Send report (1.2 KB)
  V: View report
  K: Keep report file for sending later or copying to somewhere else
  I: Cancel and ignore future crashes of this program version
  C: Cancel
Please choose (S/V/K/I/C): s

*** Uploading problem information

The collected information is being sent to the bug tracking system.
This might take a few minutes.

*** Error: Network problem

Cannot connect to crash database, please check your Internet connection.



Press any key to continue...  
end capture---

I worked around the problem by K'eeping the report and copying it to a
Xenial system. From there I am submitting this bug report.

The original problem that caused me to attempt to file a bug report
against ubuntu-keyring was an attempt to build a bionic chroot for
package building with the following command:

start capture-
# DIST=bionic cowbuilder --create --distribution bionic  --components "main 
universe" --basepath /var/cache/pbuilder/base-bionic-amd64-test.cow  --mirror 
http://us.archive.ubuntu.com:80/ubuntu --debootstrapopts 
--keyring=/usr/share/keyrings/ubuntu-archive-keyring.gpg
I: Invoking pbuilder
I: forking: pbuilder create --components 'main universe' --debootstrapopts 
--keyring=/usr/share/keyrings/ubuntu-archive-keyring.gpg --buildplace 
/var/cache/pbuilder/base-bionic-amd64-test.cow --mirror 
http://us.archive.ubuntu.com:80/ubuntu --distribution bionic --no-targz 
--extrapackages cowdancer
W: /root/.pbuilderrc does not exist
I: Running in no-targz mode
I: Distribution is bionic.
I: Current time: Mon Jun 11 22:44:21 UTC 2018
I: pbuilder-time-stamp: 1528757061
I: Building the build environment
I: running debootstrap
/usr/sbin/debootstrap
I: Retrieving InRelease 
I: Checking Release signature
E: Release signed by unknown key (key id 3B4FE6ACC0B21F32)
E: debootstrap failed
E: Tail of debootstrap.log:
gpgv: Signature made Thu Apr 26 23:38:40 2018 UTC
gpgv:using RSA key 3B4FE6ACC0B21F32
gpgv: Can't check signature: No public key
E: End of debootstrap.log
W: Aborting with an error
E: pbuilder create failed
I: forking: rm -rf /var/cache/pbuilder/base-bionic-amd64-test.cow
end capture---

On the same system the following command succeeds:

start capture-
DIST=xenial cowbuilder --create --distribution xenial \ 
  --components "main universe" \
  --basepath /var/cache/pbuilder/base-xenial-amd64.cow \
  --mirror http://us.archive.ubuntu.com:80/ubuntu \ 
  --debootstrapopts --keyring=/usr/share/keyrings/ubuntu-archive-keyring.gpg
end capture---

ProblemType: Bug
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 18.04
Package: ubuntu-keyring 2018.02.28 [modified: 
usr/share/keyrings/ubuntu-archive-keyring.gpg]
ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 4.15.0-22.24-generic 4.15.17
Uname: Linux 4.15.0-22-generic x86_64
ApportVersion: 2.20.9-0ubuntu7.2
Architecture: amd64
Date: Mon Jun 11 22:51:48 2018
Dependencies:
 
PackageArchitecture: all
ProcEnviron:
 LANG=en_US.UTF-8
 TERM=xterm
 SHELL=/bin/bash
 PATH=(custom, no user)
SourcePackage: ubuntu-keyring
UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install)

** Affects: ubuntu-keyring (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New


** Tags: amd64 apport-bug bionic

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to ubuntu-keyring in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1776329

Title:
  apport-cli and cowbuilder fail with cert and keyring errors

Status in ubuntu-keyring package in Ubuntu:
  New

Bug description:
  Description: Ubuntu 18.04 LTS
  Release: 18.04
  ubuntu-keyring:  Installed: 2018.02.28
  apport:  Installed: 2.20.9-0ubuntu7.2
  cowbuilder:  Installed: 0.86

  
  On a bionic system when attempting to report what I suspect is a bug in 
ubuntu-keying I got the following error

  start 

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1774788] Re: Daemon won't start at boot up (18LTS fully patched)

2018-06-04 Thread Bill Gradwohl
I'm a recent convert to Ubuntu, having been on Fedora from FC2 through
F26; quite a long time. Over the last few years, their support became
nonexistent. Bugs reported would not even be acknowledged, much less
worked on. To have someone actually respond to a bug report is so
unusual in my experience that I'm pleasantly shocked. Thank You. Thank
You.

Shouldn't services (sshd, rsync, etc) that depend on a NIC being
available ALL wait till that's true? Shouldn't the fix presented for
this bug become SOP for all the control files for services that require
a NIC to be up?

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to rsync in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1774788

Title:
  Daemon won't start at boot up   (18LTS fully patched)

Status in rsync:
  Unknown
Status in rsync package in Ubuntu:
  Triaged

Bug description:
  By adding the 'address=' option to the /etc/rsyncd.conf file, the
  daemon fails at boot.

  Once the NIC(s) is/are up, it will start fine when executed via
  systemctl start rsync

  
  ● rsync.service - fast remote file copy program daemon
 Loaded: loaded (/lib/systemd/system/rsync.service; enabled; vendor preset: 
enabled)
 Active: failed (Result: exit-code) since Sat 2018-06-02 08:01:31 CST; 
52min ago
Process: 851 ExecStart=/usr/bin/rsync --daemon --no-detach (code=exited, 
status=10)
   Main PID: 851 (code=exited, status=10)

  Jun 02 08:01:31 billlaptop.private.ycc systemd[1]: Started fast remote file 
copy program daemon.
  Jun 02 08:01:31 billlaptop.private.ycc rsyncd[851]: rsyncd version 3.1.2 
starting, listening on port 873
  Jun 02 08:01:31 billlaptop.private.ycc rsyncd[851]: bind() failed: Cannot 
assign requested address (address-family 2)
  Jun 02 08:01:31 billlaptop.private.ycc systemd[1]: rsync.service: Main 
process exited, code=exited, status=10/n/a
  Jun 02 08:01:31 billlaptop.private.ycc rsyncd[851]: unable to bind any 
inbound sockets on port 873
  Jun 02 08:01:31 billlaptop.private.ycc systemd[1]: rsync.service: Failed with 
result 'exit-code'.
  Jun 02 08:01:31 billlaptop.private.ycc rsyncd[851]: rsync error: error in 
socket IO (code 10) at socket.c(555) [Receiver=3.1.2]

  ProblemType: Bug
  DistroRelease: Ubuntu 18.04
  Package: rsync 3.1.2-2.1ubuntu1
  ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 4.15.0-22.24-generic 4.15.17
  Uname: Linux 4.15.0-22-generic x86_64
  ApportVersion: 2.20.9-0ubuntu7.1
  Architecture: amd64
  CurrentDesktop: GNOME
  Date: Sat Jun  2 08:48:15 2018
  InstallationDate: Installed on 2018-06-01 (0 days ago)
  InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 18.04 LTS "Bionic Beaver" - Release amd64 (20180426)
  SourcePackage: rsync
  UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install)

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/rsync/+bug/1774788/+subscriptions

-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
Post to : touch-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


[Touch-packages] [Bug 1774788] Re: Daemon won't start at boot up (18LTS fully patched)

2018-06-04 Thread Bill Gradwohl
I'm impressed!

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to rsync in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1774788

Title:
  Daemon won't start at boot up   (18LTS fully patched)

Status in rsync:
  Unknown
Status in rsync package in Ubuntu:
  Triaged

Bug description:
  By adding the 'address=' option to the /etc/rsyncd.conf file, the
  daemon fails at boot.

  Once the NIC(s) is/are up, it will start fine when executed via
  systemctl start rsync

  
  ● rsync.service - fast remote file copy program daemon
 Loaded: loaded (/lib/systemd/system/rsync.service; enabled; vendor preset: 
enabled)
 Active: failed (Result: exit-code) since Sat 2018-06-02 08:01:31 CST; 
52min ago
Process: 851 ExecStart=/usr/bin/rsync --daemon --no-detach (code=exited, 
status=10)
   Main PID: 851 (code=exited, status=10)

  Jun 02 08:01:31 billlaptop.private.ycc systemd[1]: Started fast remote file 
copy program daemon.
  Jun 02 08:01:31 billlaptop.private.ycc rsyncd[851]: rsyncd version 3.1.2 
starting, listening on port 873
  Jun 02 08:01:31 billlaptop.private.ycc rsyncd[851]: bind() failed: Cannot 
assign requested address (address-family 2)
  Jun 02 08:01:31 billlaptop.private.ycc systemd[1]: rsync.service: Main 
process exited, code=exited, status=10/n/a
  Jun 02 08:01:31 billlaptop.private.ycc rsyncd[851]: unable to bind any 
inbound sockets on port 873
  Jun 02 08:01:31 billlaptop.private.ycc systemd[1]: rsync.service: Failed with 
result 'exit-code'.
  Jun 02 08:01:31 billlaptop.private.ycc rsyncd[851]: rsync error: error in 
socket IO (code 10) at socket.c(555) [Receiver=3.1.2]

  ProblemType: Bug
  DistroRelease: Ubuntu 18.04
  Package: rsync 3.1.2-2.1ubuntu1
  ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 4.15.0-22.24-generic 4.15.17
  Uname: Linux 4.15.0-22-generic x86_64
  ApportVersion: 2.20.9-0ubuntu7.1
  Architecture: amd64
  CurrentDesktop: GNOME
  Date: Sat Jun  2 08:48:15 2018
  InstallationDate: Installed on 2018-06-01 (0 days ago)
  InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 18.04 LTS "Bionic Beaver" - Release amd64 (20180426)
  SourcePackage: rsync
  UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install)

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/rsync/+bug/1774788/+subscriptions

-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
Post to : touch-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


[Touch-packages] [Bug 1774788] [NEW] Daemon won't start at boot up (18LTS fully patched)

2018-06-02 Thread Bill Gradwohl
Public bug reported:

By adding the 'address=' option to the /etc/rsyncd.conf file, the daemon
fails at boot.

Once the NIC(s) is/are up, it will start fine when executed via
systemctl start rsync


● rsync.service - fast remote file copy program daemon
   Loaded: loaded (/lib/systemd/system/rsync.service; enabled; vendor preset: 
enabled)
   Active: failed (Result: exit-code) since Sat 2018-06-02 08:01:31 CST; 52min 
ago
  Process: 851 ExecStart=/usr/bin/rsync --daemon --no-detach (code=exited, 
status=10)
 Main PID: 851 (code=exited, status=10)

Jun 02 08:01:31 billlaptop.private.ycc systemd[1]: Started fast remote file 
copy program daemon.
Jun 02 08:01:31 billlaptop.private.ycc rsyncd[851]: rsyncd version 3.1.2 
starting, listening on port 873
Jun 02 08:01:31 billlaptop.private.ycc rsyncd[851]: bind() failed: Cannot 
assign requested address (address-family 2)
Jun 02 08:01:31 billlaptop.private.ycc systemd[1]: rsync.service: Main process 
exited, code=exited, status=10/n/a
Jun 02 08:01:31 billlaptop.private.ycc rsyncd[851]: unable to bind any inbound 
sockets on port 873
Jun 02 08:01:31 billlaptop.private.ycc systemd[1]: rsync.service: Failed with 
result 'exit-code'.
Jun 02 08:01:31 billlaptop.private.ycc rsyncd[851]: rsync error: error in 
socket IO (code 10) at socket.c(555) [Receiver=3.1.2]

ProblemType: Bug
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 18.04
Package: rsync 3.1.2-2.1ubuntu1
ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 4.15.0-22.24-generic 4.15.17
Uname: Linux 4.15.0-22-generic x86_64
ApportVersion: 2.20.9-0ubuntu7.1
Architecture: amd64
CurrentDesktop: GNOME
Date: Sat Jun  2 08:48:15 2018
InstallationDate: Installed on 2018-06-01 (0 days ago)
InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 18.04 LTS "Bionic Beaver" - Release amd64 (20180426)
SourcePackage: rsync
UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install)

** Affects: rsync (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New


** Tags: amd64 apport-bug bionic wayland-session

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to rsync in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1774788

Title:
  Daemon won't start at boot up   (18LTS fully patched)

Status in rsync package in Ubuntu:
  New

Bug description:
  By adding the 'address=' option to the /etc/rsyncd.conf file, the
  daemon fails at boot.

  Once the NIC(s) is/are up, it will start fine when executed via
  systemctl start rsync

  
  ● rsync.service - fast remote file copy program daemon
 Loaded: loaded (/lib/systemd/system/rsync.service; enabled; vendor preset: 
enabled)
 Active: failed (Result: exit-code) since Sat 2018-06-02 08:01:31 CST; 
52min ago
Process: 851 ExecStart=/usr/bin/rsync --daemon --no-detach (code=exited, 
status=10)
   Main PID: 851 (code=exited, status=10)

  Jun 02 08:01:31 billlaptop.private.ycc systemd[1]: Started fast remote file 
copy program daemon.
  Jun 02 08:01:31 billlaptop.private.ycc rsyncd[851]: rsyncd version 3.1.2 
starting, listening on port 873
  Jun 02 08:01:31 billlaptop.private.ycc rsyncd[851]: bind() failed: Cannot 
assign requested address (address-family 2)
  Jun 02 08:01:31 billlaptop.private.ycc systemd[1]: rsync.service: Main 
process exited, code=exited, status=10/n/a
  Jun 02 08:01:31 billlaptop.private.ycc rsyncd[851]: unable to bind any 
inbound sockets on port 873
  Jun 02 08:01:31 billlaptop.private.ycc systemd[1]: rsync.service: Failed with 
result 'exit-code'.
  Jun 02 08:01:31 billlaptop.private.ycc rsyncd[851]: rsync error: error in 
socket IO (code 10) at socket.c(555) [Receiver=3.1.2]

  ProblemType: Bug
  DistroRelease: Ubuntu 18.04
  Package: rsync 3.1.2-2.1ubuntu1
  ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 4.15.0-22.24-generic 4.15.17
  Uname: Linux 4.15.0-22-generic x86_64
  ApportVersion: 2.20.9-0ubuntu7.1
  Architecture: amd64
  CurrentDesktop: GNOME
  Date: Sat Jun  2 08:48:15 2018
  InstallationDate: Installed on 2018-06-01 (0 days ago)
  InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 18.04 LTS "Bionic Beaver" - Release amd64 (20180426)
  SourcePackage: rsync
  UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install)

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/rsync/+bug/1774788/+subscriptions

-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
Post to : touch-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


[Touch-packages] [Bug 1549473] Re: ssh will not start at boot: systemctl status ssh -> output is listed as failed 255.

2018-04-29 Thread Bill Gradwohl
I installed version 16LTS recently and just upgraded the box to 18LTS
and both display the error.

I have 2 NICs (Private / Public) with an sshd config file set to only
listen to the private side. It appears sshd attempt to start after the
Public NIC is up, but before the private NIC is available. The Private
NIC becomes available several seconds after sshd is initiated according
to journalctl.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to openssh in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1549473

Title:
  ssh will not start at boot:  systemctl status ssh -> output is listed
  as failed 255.

Status in portable OpenSSH:
  New
Status in openssh package in Ubuntu:
  Confirmed
Status in openssh package in Debian:
  New

Bug description:
  Using apt I have reinstalled and purged both ssh and openssh-server. 
  apt-get remove --purge ssh openssh-server
  reinstalled
  updated
  and on boot the ctl status is failed 255

  After much forum research and attempts to default solutions, the final word 
was that reinstall usually fixes this issue. 
  With the issue usually stemming from ssh service trying to start before 
network services are available.

  Currently I have no logs available with 
  journalctl -u sshd | tail -100

  I can provide info pertaining to this on request.

  ProblemType: Bug
  DistroRelease: Ubuntu 15.10
  Package: ssh 1:6.9p1-2ubuntu0.1
  ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 4.2.0-30.35-generic 4.2.8-ckt3
  Uname: Linux 4.2.0-30-generic x86_64
  ApportVersion: 2.19.1-0ubuntu5
  Architecture: amd64
  CurrentDesktop: LXDE
  Date: Wed Feb 24 14:27:55 2016
  InstallationDate: Installed on 2016-02-09 (15 days ago)
  InstallationMedia: Lubuntu 15.10 "Wily Werewolf" - Release amd64 (20151021)
  PackageArchitecture: all
  SourcePackage: openssh
  UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install)

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/openssh/+bug/1549473/+subscriptions

-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
Post to : touch-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


  1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   >