[Touch-packages] [Bug 1902135] Re: package openssh-server 1:8.2p1-4ubuntu0.1 failed to install/upgrade: el subproceso instalado paquete openssh-server script post-installation devolvió el código de sa

2020-10-30 Thread Christian Ehrhardt
Hi, thanks for the report but IMHO there is not much to do, port 22 is SSHs port and it is right to default to it. If your local configuration has port 22 bound to something else (Docker in your case) you need to adapt the configuration of either (ssh in its half installed state or your

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1902109] Re: rsync uses lchmod and fails in Ubuntu >= 20.10 if /proc isn't mounted

2020-10-30 Thread Christian Ehrhardt
Awesome, thanks for updating the bug tasks and tracking bug already Alkis! -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to rsync in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1902109 Title: rsync uses lchmod and fails in

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1901295] Re: python3-chardet breaks install of python-chardet

2020-10-27 Thread Christian Ehrhardt
Maintainers are free to remove python2 if there are no reverse dependencies left for the obvious unsupportability. This happened here in [1] to resolve [2] There also is no installation candidate left in a recent archive. Maybe replaces/breaks was a bit too much (as users like you could be happy

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1901295] Re: python3-chardet breaks install of python-chardet

2020-10-27 Thread Christian Ehrhardt
I can confirm the behavior ** Changed in: python3-chardet (Ubuntu) Status: New => Confirmed -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to python3-chardet in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1901295 Title:

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1899852] Re: Cannot assign requested address: AH00072: make_sock: could not bind to address

2020-10-19 Thread Christian Ehrhardt
Thank you for taking the time to report this bug and helping to make Ubuntu better. Since it seems likely to me that this is a local configuration problem, rather than a bug in Ubuntu, I'm marking this bug as Incomplete. If indeed this is a local configuration problem, you can find pointers to

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1899852] Re: Cannot assign requested address: AH00072: make_sock: could not bind to address

2020-10-19 Thread Christian Ehrhardt
Now to your actual question of "how to order after a given bond interface", that is actually a systemd-networkd/systemd question (reminder question, not a bug - so not a bug report actually). I'll add bug tasks but think they are incomplete as that is a config/consulting question more than

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1900008] Re: Sessions of screen does not keep running in background

2020-10-19 Thread Christian Ehrhardt
Thanks Axel, I think I didn't closed a terminal windows with anything other but CTRL+D for years (which is an implicit call to exit), but you are absolutely right. It could be "click on the X on the window decoration to close the terminal". Thanks for making me see that ... :-) @Gustavo - never

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1744328] Re: libfreebl3.so should be public, not in the nss subdir

2020-10-19 Thread Christian Ehrhardt
FYI since comment #6 not a lot happened in Debian other than other bugs being merged. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to nss in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1744328 Title: libfreebl3.so should be

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1897744] Re: VerifyHostKeyDNS not working due to missing trust-ad flag

2020-10-14 Thread Christian Ehrhardt
I just re-debugged into the same case - now marked as dup. You might consider using https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/systemd/+bug/1898590/comments/7 as test steps to verify that once uploaded to focal-proposed. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1898590] Re: Verify DNS fingerprints not working

2020-10-14 Thread Christian Ehrhardt
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 1897744 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1897744 @Dan - now I saw your update - that might have shortened my dnssec trip :-) It indeed is a duplicate of that - marking as such. ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 1897744 VerifyHostKeyDNS

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1898590] Re: Verify DNS fingerprints not working

2020-10-14 Thread Christian Ehrhardt
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 1897744 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1897744 Summary: - we understand what happened - we have a workaround for users by changing a config - we have a systemd change that can be considered to be backported by the systemd package maintainers ** Tags

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1898590] Re: Verify DNS fingerprints not working

2020-10-14 Thread Christian Ehrhardt
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 1897744 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1897744 TL;DR: one affected by this upgrade triggered behavior change needs to set options edns0 trust-ad in /etc/resolv.conf to fix the issue. And as usual, once you already know what things are about - then

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1898590] Re: Verify DNS fingerprints not working

2020-10-14 Thread Christian Ehrhardt
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 1897744 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1897744 ok up/downgrading just "libc6" is enough to trigger. I also found that libc6 from Eoan version 2.30-0ubuntu2.2 is good. So it is new in 2.31! The changelog mentions soem DNSSEC

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1898590] Re: Verify DNS fingerprints not working

2020-10-14 Thread Christian Ehrhardt
As a first step I tried to make sure this actually is a change in openssh. Because my reading of the issues referred above has shown that not all of the verification is done inside ssh but partially in glibc. So I upgraded on the bionic test system step by step. The upgrade dependency list for

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1898590] Re: Verify DNS fingerprints not working

2020-10-14 Thread Christian Ehrhardt
Something helpful for anyone looking into this later I found what seems a good testcase without requiring too much a local setup (of a dnssec dns server): To get unbound (brute force) do: apt install unbound sudo systemctl stop systemd-resolved sudo systemctl disable systemd-resolved sudo

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1898590] Re: Verify DNS fingerprints not working

2020-10-14 Thread Christian Ehrhardt
Turns out this seems to be a never ending story and you might have found a comeback of that issue for your particular configuration as you say this worked on 18.04 but fails on 20.04. This goes way back https://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1455 Or half way back

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1898590] Re: Verify DNS fingerprints not working

2020-10-13 Thread Christian Ehrhardt
** Tags added: server-next -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to openssh in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1898590 Title: Verify DNS fingerprints not working Status in openssh package in Ubuntu: New

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1892559] Re: [MIR] ccid libpam-pkcs1 libpcsc-perl opensc pcsc-tools pcsc-lite

2020-10-08 Thread Christian Ehrhardt
Hi Seth and Joy, I see you cleared the list a lot - awesome! You have subscribed and pinged the remaining ones which is a reasonable approach as most might be no more real issues as of today. I'm ok for the Ubuntu side of the pcsc-lite bugs now, what still needs to be addressed is

[Touch-packages] [Bug 857651] Re: Unable to hide users from login screen / user switcher

2020-09-28 Thread Christian Ehrhardt
Since so many components are involved a fix/change might have been missed. And since I recently didn't hear anything about this otherwise rather hot bug I was giving focal a try. It turns out that this was indeed improved. Only the user of pkg:ifmail user fdt name "Fidonet" is still visible.

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1895967] Re: Apparmor 3.0.0 does not load profiles in containers anymore

2020-09-22 Thread Christian Ehrhardt
Tested the change - works as expected, prepping an MP -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to apparmor in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1895967 Title: Apparmor 3.0.0 does not load profiles in containers

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1895967] Re: Apparmor 3.0.0 does not load profiles in containers anymore

2020-09-22 Thread Christian Ehrhardt
That patch by Christian Bolz is already applied (which seems reasonable after that much time), but when merging 3.0 the old patch for bug 1824812 should have been dropped. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1895967] Re: Apparmor 3.0.0 does not load profiles in containers anymore

2020-09-22 Thread Christian Ehrhardt
As refrence, it is a re-occurrence of https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libvirt/+bug/1824812 , look who filed that bug :-) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to apparmor in Ubuntu.

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1895967] Re: Apparmor 3.0.0 does not load profiles in containers anymore

2020-09-22 Thread Christian Ehrhardt
https://gitlab.com/apparmor/apparmor/-/commit/61c27d8808f0589beb6a319cc04073e8bb32d860 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to apparmor in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1895967 Title: Apparmor 3.0.0 does

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1895967] Re: Apparmor 3.0.0 does not load profiles in containers anymore

2020-09-22 Thread Christian Ehrhardt
And we are back with Christian Bolz :-) commit 61c27d8808f0589beb6a319cc04073e8bb32d860 Author: Christian Boltz Date: Fri Jun 21 19:22:15 2019 +0200 Fix and simplify setting SFS_MOUNTPOINT The question is why isn't this in the apparmor 3.0 package in groovy- proposed ? -- You received

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1895967] Re: Apparmor 3.0.0 does not load profiles in containers anymore

2020-09-22 Thread Christian Ehrhardt
Isn't that "Not starting AppArmor in container" message just in: /lib/apparmor/apparmor.systemd -> /lib/apparmor/rc.apparmor.functions -> function is_container_with_internal_policy() That looks unchanged (except a comment) but it behaves differently: root@testguest-apparmor-good:~# .

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1895967] Re: 3.0.0~beta1-0ubuntu1 in Groovy breaks Libvirt/Qemu/KVM

2020-09-22 Thread Christian Ehrhardt
Bad case: $ ./repro.sh bad + '[' bad == bad ']' + echo 'Bad case: Using apparmor from proposed' Bad case: Using apparmor from proposed + BADCASE=1 + lxc stop --force testguest-apparmor-bad + lxc delete --force testguest-apparmor-bad + lxc launch ubuntu-daily:groovy/amd64 testguest-apparmor-bad

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1895967] Re: 3.0.0~beta1-0ubuntu1 in Groovy breaks Libvirt/Qemu/KVM

2020-09-22 Thread Christian Ehrhardt
It seems it comes down to a change in /lib/apparmor/apparmor.systemd which now refuses to load profiles when running in a container. Example with 3.0: $ /lib/apparmor/apparmor.systemd reload Not starting AppArmor in container Example with 2.x /lib/apparmor/apparmor.systemd reload Restarting

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1895967] Re: 3.0.0~beta1-0ubuntu1 in Groovy breaks Libvirt/Qemu/KVM

2020-09-22 Thread Christian Ehrhardt
FYI - other testing might miss this as "starting a guest on groovy" works with the new versions, but it will be without apparmor. Migrating from focal or a pre-upgrade groovy shows the issues broken by apparmor not being enabled. ** Changed in: apparmor (Ubuntu) Status: Incomplete => New

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1895967] Re: 3.0.0~beta1-0ubuntu1 in Groovy breaks Libvirt/Qemu/KVM

2020-09-22 Thread Christian Ehrhardt
I have backed up this container and its snapshot for later and re-run the whole automation which got me that bad state. That allowed me to run my automation again without removing this container (in case we need it for debugging later). So I ran everything again to check if it would happen again

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1895967] Re: 3.0.0~beta1-0ubuntu1 in Groovy breaks Libvirt/Qemu/KVM

2020-09-22 Thread Christian Ehrhardt
Ok, I have definitely a snapshot left that has "conserved" the bad state. $ lxc stop testkvm-groovy-from $ lxc restore testkvm-groovy-from orig $ lxc start testkvm-groovy-from $ lxc exec testkvm-groovy-from # aa-status apparmor module is loaded. 15 profiles are loaded. 15 profiles are in enforce

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1895967] Re: 3.0.0~beta1-0ubuntu1 in Groovy breaks Libvirt/Qemu/KVM

2020-09-22 Thread Christian Ehrhardt
Hi Christian Bolz o/ I'd have such rules but this isn't the problem here as that would matter only much later. I libvirtd itself isn't confined it refuses to go on confining the guests and that is here the problem. The current question really comes down to "how did I manage to have everything

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1895967] Re: 3.0.0~beta1-0ubuntu1 in Groovy breaks Libvirt/Qemu/KVM

2020-09-22 Thread Christian Ehrhardt
I knew from my former tests: 1. apparmor 3.0 = bad 2. downgrading to 2.13.3-7ubuntu6 and back up to 3.0 = good 3. aa-enforce + service restart = good I checked the logs on the affected systems how this got into the bad state: $ grep -E 'configure (lib)?(apparmor|libvirt)' /var/log/dpkg.log

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1895060] Re: [FFe] apparmor 3 upstream release

2020-09-22 Thread Christian Ehrhardt
Sorry, while being about evaluating the new apparmor this got posted to the wrong bug :-/ -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to apparmor in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1895060 Title: [FFe] apparmor 3

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1895060] Re: [FFe] apparmor 3 upstream release

2020-09-22 Thread Christian Ehrhardt
I knew from my former tests: 1. apparmor 3.0 = bad 2. downgrading to 2.13.3-7ubuntu6 and back up to 3.0 = good 3. aa-enforce + service restart = good I checked the logs on the affected systems how this got into the bad state: $ grep -E 'configure (lib)?(apparmor|libvirt)' /var/log/dpkg.log

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1895967] Re: 3.0.0~beta1-0ubuntu1 in Groovy breaks Libvirt/Qemu/KVM

2020-09-21 Thread Christian Ehrhardt
Yeah and the comment above this function pointed the right way: Good case (libvirt is enforced): oot@testkvm-groovy-to:~# aa-status apparmor module is loaded. 31 profiles are loaded. 31 profiles are in enforce mode. /snap/snapd/9279/usr/lib/snapd/snap-confine

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1895967] Re: 3.0.0~beta1-0ubuntu1 in Groovy breaks Libvirt/Qemu/KVM

2020-09-21 Thread Christian Ehrhardt
This gets me back to a working system $ aa-enforce /etc/apparmor.d/usr.sbin.libvirtd $ systemctl restart libvirtd And this also explains why on the system where I re-installed libvirt things might have worked. The re-install runs dh_apparmor which has loaded and enforced it. -- You

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1895967] Re: 3.0.0~beta1-0ubuntu1 in Groovy breaks Libvirt/Qemu/KVM

2020-09-21 Thread Christian Ehrhardt
Sorry my system broke down in various way stalling debugging of this for a few days. Back on it ... -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to apparmor in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1895967 Title:

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1895967] Re: 3.0.0~beta1-0ubuntu1 in Groovy breaks Libvirt/Qemu/KVM

2020-09-17 Thread Christian Ehrhardt
This is the failing function 221 /* returns -1 on error or profile for libvirtd is unconfined, 0 if complain 222 * mode and 1 if enforcing. This is required because at present you cannot 223 * aa_change_profile() from a process that is unconfined. 224

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1895967] Re: 3.0.0~beta1-0ubuntu1 in Groovy breaks Libvirt/Qemu/KVM

2020-09-17 Thread Christian Ehrhardt
Lookup fails: (gdb) fin Run till exit from #0 virSecurityDriverLookup (name=name@entry=0x0, virtDriver=virtDriver@entry=0x7fffd26ae1b2 "QEMU") at ../../../src/security/security_driver.c:50 virSecurityManagerNew (name=name@entry=0x0, virtDriver=virtDriver@entry=0x7fffd26ae1b2 "QEMU",

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1895967] Re: 3.0.0~beta1-0ubuntu1 in Groovy breaks Libvirt/Qemu/KVM

2020-09-17 Thread Christian Ehrhardt
Need to check the init of the bunch in qemuSecurityInit and qemuSecurityNew. But that happens at daemon start and not later when probing caps. virQEMUDriverConfigLoadSecurityEntry load this from config and it includes apparmor in both: /etc/libvirt/qemu.conf:# security_driver = [

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1895967] Re: 3.0.0~beta1-0ubuntu1 in Groovy breaks Libvirt/Qemu/KVM

2020-09-17 Thread Christian Ehrhardt
Good: (gdb) p *((virSecurityStackDataPtr)(((virQEMUDriverPtr)conn->privateData )->securityManager->privateData))->itemsHead->securityManager $7 = {parent = {parent = {parent_instance = {g_type_instance = {g_class = 0x7f430805ddf0}, ref_count = 1, qdata = 0x0}}, lock = {lock = {__data = {__lock

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1895967] Re: 3.0.0~beta1-0ubuntu1 in Groovy breaks Libvirt/Qemu/KVM

2020-09-17 Thread Christian Ehrhardt
for (i = 0; sec_managers[i]; i++) { ... VIR_DEBUG("Initialized caps for security driver \"%s\" with " Good: - apparmor - dac Bad: - none - dac In function virQEMUDriverCreateCapabilities. So it isn't probing apparmor because it isn't even in the list. That list is from

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1895967] Re: 3.0.0~beta1-0ubuntu1 in Groovy breaks Libvirt/Qemu/KVM

2020-09-17 Thread Christian Ehrhardt
It seems once fixed the system is ok and I can't get into the bad state again :/ I tried on another bad system (withotu changing back to the former version) 1. A restart of the service 2. Trying to force capabilities reset (remove cache) + service restart None of these got it into the good case,

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1895967] [NEW] 3.0.0~beta1-0ubuntu1 in Groovy breaks Libvirt/Qemu/KVM

2020-09-17 Thread Christian Ehrhardt
Public bug reported: Hi, I stumbled over this due to automatic tests checking proposed. I found that Focal no more could migrate to Groovy with: $ virsh migrate --unsafe --live fguest qemu+ssh://10.162.30.163/system error: unsupported configuration: Security driver model 'apparmor' is not

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1894619] Re: [2.82 regression] router announcements have 'forever' lifetime by default

2020-09-17 Thread Christian Ehrhardt
The tests confirmed the issue that Iain reported and that the fix works. Also no other issues popped up in the NM test using it. autopkgtest [08:47:12]: summary wpa-dhclient PASS nm.pyPASS killswitches-no-urfkill PASS urfkill-integration PASS And

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1895576] Re: boot-and-services in tests-in-lxd autopkgtest fails in groovy on s390x

2020-09-17 Thread Christian Ehrhardt
For now the hint is in groovy, but the next systemd upload needs to resolve it one (fix) or the other (mark this one as flaky) way. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to systemd in Ubuntu.

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1894619] Re: [2.82 regression] router announcements have 'forever' lifetime by default

2020-09-16 Thread Christian Ehrhardt
FYI: builds complete - Running the test builds of network- manager_1.26.2-1ubuntu1.dsc in groovy against the proposed and the PPA version. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to dnsmasq in Ubuntu.

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1894619] Re: [2.82 regression] router announcements have 'forever' lifetime by default

2020-09-16 Thread Christian Ehrhardt
Ok changed MP and PPA to work for 1.0 source -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to dnsmasq in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1894619 Title: [2.82 regression] router announcements have 'forever' lifetime

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1894619] Re: [2.82 regression] router announcements have 'forever' lifetime by default

2020-09-16 Thread Christian Ehrhardt
Arrr 1.0 source, need to apply differently -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to dnsmasq in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1894619 Title: [2.82 regression] router announcements have 'forever'

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1894619] Re: [2.82 regression] router announcements have 'forever' lifetime by default

2020-09-16 Thread Christian Ehrhardt
BTW I randomly picked the latter patch of the two as no one seems to have jumped on the first one and said "yes let us apply it". -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to dnsmasq in Ubuntu.

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1894619] Re: [2.82 regression] router announcements have 'forever' lifetime by default

2020-09-16 Thread Christian Ehrhardt
The patch suggested at http://lists.thekelleys.org.uk/pipermail/dnsmasq-discuss/2020q3/014346.html isn't applied yet. I guess this waits for feedback if it worked before they apply it. To get this going here a PPA and an associated MP: PPA:

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1892559] Re: [MIR] ccid libpam-pkcs1 libpcsc-perl opensc pcsc-tools pcsc-lite

2020-09-16 Thread Christian Ehrhardt
Sorry, I forgot to update one section for pcsc-lite on packaging: - important open bugs (crashers, etc) in Debian or Ubuntu There are quite some:

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1892559] Re: [MIR] ccid libpam-pkcs1 libpcsc-perl opensc pcsc-tools pcsc-lite

2020-09-16 Thread Christian Ehrhardt
in Debian or Ubuntu - no dependency on webkit, qtwebkit, seed or libgoa-* - no embedded source copies - not part of the UI for extra checks ** Changed in: pcsc-lite (Ubuntu) Assignee: Christian Ehrhardt  (paelzer) => Ubuntu Security Team (ubuntu-security) ** Bug watch added: Debian Bug tr

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1895576] Re: boot-and-services in tests-in-lxd autopkgtest fails in groovy on s390x

2020-09-16 Thread Christian Ehrhardt
The retries were reproducible failing as well. [09:20] rbalint: btw the test on s390x really seems still broken [09:20] we need either a fix or a test hint [09:21] --> falcojr (~falcojr@184.55.64.152) has joined this channel. [09:24] cpaelzer, i'm ok with the hint and i've retriggered the

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1895576] Re: boot-and-services in tests-in-lxd autopkgtest fails in groovy on s390x

2020-09-16 Thread Christian Ehrhardt
Old hints we only had: # failing due to multiple reasons LP: #1892358 force-badtest systemd/246-2ubuntu1 # failing due to livecd-rootfs creating broken LXD images LP: #1877078 force-reset-test systemd/246.2-1ubuntu1 But was then removed in revno: 4988 committer: Steve Langasek branch nick:

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1895576] Re: boot-and-services in tests-in-lxd autopkgtest fails in groovy on s390x

2020-09-16 Thread Christian Ehrhardt
Also please do note that while almost all of the recent tests failed - almost all of the packages already migrated. Why is that - there is no test hint in place. For example gdm3/3.37.90-1ubuntu1 and iptables/1.8.4-3ubuntu3 (but more than just those, policykit-1, dpdk, util-linux, ...) NEVER

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1892358] Re: autopkgtest success rate dropped inhibiting proposed migration

2020-09-16 Thread Christian Ehrhardt
And on Bionic we only need to do so for amd64 Here is a new MP for Bionic: https://code.launchpad.net/~paelzer/britney/hints-ubuntu-bionic-disable-systemd-v2/+merge/390793 ** Branch linked: lp:~paelzer/britney/hints-ubuntu-bionic-disable- systemd-v2 -- You received this bug notification because

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1892358] Re: autopkgtest success rate dropped inhibiting proposed migration

2020-09-16 Thread Christian Ehrhardt
The problem with Xenial is that there it isn't just flaky "systemd- fsckd" much more seems to be broken. I'll revise my Bionic MP, but for Xenial I'd like to hear from ddstreet/rbalint how they think we should go on there ... -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1895576] Re: boot-and-services in tests-in-lxd autopkgtest fails in groovy on s390x

2020-09-16 Thread Christian Ehrhardt
@Rbalint - hi the two most recent tests confirm that it still seems broken. Maybe the good run was a one-off lucky run ... :-/ I'd ask you to look into that a bit deeper as it will again hold back plenty of things in groovy soon. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1892358] Re: autopkgtest success rate dropped inhibiting proposed migration

2020-09-16 Thread Christian Ehrhardt
Focal test hint was accepted tonight and things moved there. @Kelsey - Steve denied the hint as a reset since recently a few results were good. Maybe you want to submit the same as force-badtest and bring it up like that for X? The results for xenial really look similarly bad ... xenial

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1892559] Re: [MIR] ccid libpam-pkcs1 libpcsc-perl opensc pcsc-tools pcsc-lite

2020-09-15 Thread Christian Ehrhardt
** Changed in: pcsc-lite (Ubuntu) Assignee: Seth Arnold (seth-arnold) => Christian Ehrhardt  (paelzer) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to pcsc-lite in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1892559 Ti

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1892358] Re: autopkgtest success rate dropped inhibiting proposed migration

2020-09-15 Thread Christian Ehrhardt
** Branch linked: lp:~paelzer/britney/hints-ubuntu-focal-disable-systemd -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to systemd in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1892358 Title: autopkgtest success rate dropped

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1892358] Re: autopkgtest success rate dropped inhibiting proposed migration

2020-09-15 Thread Christian Ehrhardt
Thanks rbalint for pointing me to the other bug for the s390x fail we see now. I'll continue there and consider the Groovy portion of this one closed again. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to systemd in Ubuntu.

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1895576] Re: boot-and-services in tests-in-lxd autopkgtest fails in groovy on s390x

2020-09-15 Thread Christian Ehrhardt
Thanks for this bug Rbalint. That the new glibc/cryptsetup worked is odd as nothing on the issue indicates they are related. There was nothing in the queue - for the sake of some test data I have restarted the packages currently blocked on this with all-proposed which will pull in e.g.

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1892358] Re: autopkgtest success rate dropped inhibiting proposed migration

2020-09-14 Thread Christian Ehrhardt
Groovy It seems this isn't over for groovy, it was mentioned that the issues in the subtest "tests-in-lxd" would be related to some fstab issues in those issues. But recently all architectures, but s390x recovered. I assume that the fstab issue is fixed but something else surfaces now. groovy

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1892358] Re: autopkgtest success rate dropped inhibiting proposed migration

2020-09-10 Thread Christian Ehrhardt
[15:17] ddstreet: any updates on 1892358? [15:18] @paelzer sorry not yet, i'll have systemd ready for upload next week including fixing the autopkgtests [15:21] ok -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to systemd

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1894838] Re: FFe: update to 2.4.53, fixing crash bugs

2020-09-09 Thread Christian Ehrhardt
** Merge proposal linked: https://code.launchpad.net/~ahasenack/ubuntu/+source/openldap/+git/openldap/+merge/390398 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to openldap in Ubuntu.

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1892358] Re: autopkgtest success rate dropped inhibiting proposed migration

2020-09-07 Thread Christian Ehrhardt
@ddstret - any update how to proceed? If you have no time yet, then the MPs to ignore the fail until we have a new version are up - just ack them and I guess the SRU Team will follow. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1774342] Re: /lib/systemd/system/isc-dhcp-server.service $INTERFACES variable

2020-09-07 Thread Christian Ehrhardt
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 1894172 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1894172 ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 1894172 isc-dhcp-server using wrong env variable for INTERFACES -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1761096] Re: dnsmasq starts with error on Ubuntu Xenial amd64 when squid installed

2020-09-04 Thread Christian Ehrhardt
Thanks for --no-ask-password Sergio. I like the suggestion of making /etc/resolvconf/update-libc.d/squid systemd aware. >From similar checks I know that you also want to check if it is active: if [ -d /run/systemd/system ]; then ! systemctl is-active -q squid.service || systemctl reload

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1761096] Re: dnsmasq starts with error on Ubuntu Xenial amd64 when squid installed

2020-09-02 Thread Christian Ehrhardt
As already reported dnsmasq hangs on the hooks: ├─2089 /bin/sh /etc/init.d/dnsmasq systemd-start-resolvconf ├─2097 run-parts --arg=-a --arg=lo.dnsmasq /etc/resolvconf/update.d ├─2116 run-parts /etc/resolvconf/update-libc.d ├─2129 /bin/sh

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1761096] Re: dnsmasq starts with error on Ubuntu Xenial amd64 when squid installed

2020-09-02 Thread Christian Ehrhardt
Since Sergio mentioned groovy, this really only is a xenial issue: Test: 1. install dnsqmasq+squid 2. ensure dnsmasq is able to run (port collision >=Focal) 3. stop/start dnsmasq in a loop for i in $(seq 1 4); do date; echo "-"; systemctl stop dnsmasq; date; echo "+"; systemctl start dnsmasq;

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1761096] Re: dnsmasq starts with error on Ubuntu Xenial amd64 when squid installed

2020-09-02 Thread Christian Ehrhardt
Sergio: > "squid takes 30 seconds to restart regardless of dnsmasq/resolvconf (this is > still true nowadays, with groovy)" I'm ashamed - it seems I have taken the most complex way to resolve a simple thing. Imagine a very complex debugging through strace and gdb to reach a trivial config

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1761096] Re: dnsmasq starts with error on Ubuntu Xenial amd64 when squid installed

2020-09-02 Thread Christian Ehrhardt
Sergio: > ... reload" actually exits successfully ... systemctl ... keeps waiting For the systemd side I'd wonder as there are so myn type= options if it is not getting that squid is restarted. (https://www.freedesktop.org/software/systemd/man/systemd.service.html#Options) maybe worth to

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1892559] Re: [MIR] ccid libpam-pkcs1 libpcsc-perl opensc pcsc-tools pcsc-lite

2020-08-31 Thread Christian Ehrhardt
assigning pcsc-lite back to sarnold for the decision if you really need/want it for "pcscd" or not. ** Changed in: pcsc-lite (Ubuntu) Assignee: (unassigned) => Seth Arnold (seth-arnold) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1892559] Re: [MIR] ccid libpam-pkcs1 libpcsc-perl opensc pcsc-tools pcsc-lite

2020-08-31 Thread Christian Ehrhardt
hanged in: pcsc-perl (Ubuntu) Status: New => Invalid ** Changed in: pcsc-tools (Ubuntu) Status: New => Invalid ** Changed in: pcsc-perl (Ubuntu) Assignee: Christian Ehrhardt  (paelzer) => (unassigned) ** Changed in: pcsc-tools (Ubuntu) Assignee: Christian Ehrhar

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1892559] Re: [MIR] ccid libpam-pkcs1 libpcsc-perl opensc pcsc-tools pcsc-lite

2020-08-31 Thread Christian Ehrhardt
I asked about it in comment #2 already. pcsc-lite was MIRed in bug 250245 but pcscd explcitly excluded. One either needs to: 1. step up and say "yes we want to own it" (in that case please add a request to the description) 2. say this isn't needed for what you want to achieve (Essentially

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1892559] Re: [MIR] ccid libpam-pkcs1 libpcsc-perl opensc pcsc-tools pcsc-lite

2020-08-31 Thread Christian Ehrhardt
no use of setuid - no important open bugs (crashers, etc) in Debian or Ubuntu - no dependency on webkit, qtwebkit, seed or libgoa-* - no embedded source copies - not part of the UI for extra checks ** Changed in: pam-pkcs11 (Ubuntu) Assignee: Christian Ehrhardt  (paelzer) => Ubuntu Sec

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1892559] Re: [MIR] ccid libpam-pkcs1 libpcsc-perl opensc pcsc-tools pcsc-lite

2020-08-31 Thread Christian Ehrhardt
n) ** Changed in: opensc (Ubuntu) Status: New => Incomplete ** Changed in: opensc (Ubuntu) Assignee: Christian Ehrhardt  (paelzer) => Ubuntu Security Team (ubuntu-security) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is s

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1892559] Re: [MIR] ccid libpam-pkcs1 libpcsc-perl opensc pcsc-tools pcsc-lite

2020-08-31 Thread Christian Ehrhardt
do, gksu, pkexec, or LD_LIBRARY_PATH - no use of user nobody - no use of setuid - no important open bugs (crashers, etc) in Debian or Ubuntu - no dependency on webkit, qtwebkit, seed or libgoa-* - no embedded source copies - not part of the UI for extra checks ** Changed in: ccid (Ubuntu) Assignee: Ch

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1892358] Re: autopkgtest success rate dropped inhibiting proposed migration

2020-08-31 Thread Christian Ehrhardt
If not going for marking the subtest flaky as in groovy, I have prepared force-reset-test as alternatives in: - https://code.launchpad.net/~paelzer/britney/hints-ubuntu-focal-disable-systemd/+merge/390005 -

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1892358] Re: autopkgtest success rate dropped inhibiting proposed migration

2020-08-30 Thread Christian Ehrhardt
To match the open packages blocked on this in active releases I added linux-meta for BIonic (thanks Kleber for the hint) and Focal (Thanks Kelsey for the hint). I think all of those had enough of retry-until-success and I'd ask again for how we should proceed there. Masking/Resetting the test via

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1892358] Re: autopkgtest success rate dropped inhibiting proposed migration

2020-08-26 Thread Christian Ehrhardt
Util-linux SRU in Focal blocked as well, updating tags. ** Also affects: util-linux (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Changed in: util-linux (Ubuntu Focal) Status: New => Confirmed ** Changed in: util-linux (Ubuntu) Status: New => Invalid -- You received

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1892358] Re: autopkgtest success rate dropped inhibiting proposed migration

2020-08-26 Thread Christian Ehrhardt
True @Kleber, here the stats of Bionic - at least on x86 you seem to have barely a chance. bionic amd64 boot-smoke (F 40% S 0% B 0% => P 60%/) ...F.FFF.FF.FF.. upstream (F 5% S 0% B 0% => P 95%/) ..F. systemd-fsckd

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1892559] Re: [MIR] ccid libpam-pkcs1 libpcsc-perl opensc pcsc-tools

2020-08-26 Thread Christian Ehrhardt
: (unassigned) => Christian Ehrhardt  (paelzer) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to pcsc-lite in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1892559 Title: [MIR] ccid libpam-pkcs1 libpcsc-perl opensc pcsc-tools p

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1892358] Re: autopkgtest success rate dropped inhibiting proposed migration

2020-08-26 Thread Christian Ehrhardt
Here an (monospace) overview of recent focal tests. focal amd64 networkd-testpy(F 5% S 0% B 5% => P 90%/) .B...F.. boot-and-services (F 5% S 0% B 5% => P 90%/) .B...F.. upstream (F 5% S 0% B 5% =>

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1892358] Re: autopkgtest success rate dropped inhibiting proposed migration

2020-08-25 Thread Christian Ehrhardt
https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/systemd/246.2-1ubuntu1 is still in proposed and I was looking forward to a bunch of custom triggers this morning. But I found everything migrated this morning despite those new tests not being done.

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1892358] Re: autopkgtest success rate dropped inhibiting proposed migration

2020-08-25 Thread Christian Ehrhardt
What is left is the similar situation in Focal (as mentioned before). I have updated the tasks to reflect that properly and get update-excuse tagging there. In Focal it is currently blocking qemu and build-essential SRUs and I wanted to ask if the plan is to do the same upload+test-reset there

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1892358] Re: autopkgtest success rate dropped inhibiting proposed migration

2020-08-25 Thread Christian Ehrhardt
[16:34] seb128, cpaelzer ahasenack sorry, i was out and apparently forgot setting that in my email. the last systemd upload should fix everything except for the livecd-rootfs revert that made fstab in lxd images invalide [16:45] rbalint: " the last systemd upload" means groovy I guess, what

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1892455] Re: [MIR] libselinux1

2020-08-25 Thread Christian Ehrhardt
** Changed in: libselinux (Ubuntu) Status: New => Incomplete -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to libselinux in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1892455 Title: [MIR] libselinux1 Status in

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1844879] Re: Behaviour change in systemd 243 breaks libvirt autopkgtest

2020-08-25 Thread Christian Ehrhardt
This no more affects libvirt, marking it as such to not show up in excuses. ** Changed in: libvirt (Ubuntu) Status: Incomplete => Invalid -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to systemd in Ubuntu.

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1892358] Re: autopkgtest success rate dropped inhibiting proposed migration

2020-08-24 Thread Christian Ehrhardt
Adding glib2.0 as it had a rebuild for libffi and will be blocke dby this as well. ** Also affects: glib2.0 (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Changed in: glib2.0 (Ubuntu) Status: New => Confirmed -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1892358] Re: autopkgtest success rate dropped inhibiting proposed migration

2020-08-23 Thread Christian Ehrhardt
Added another two packages that are blocked by this so they are marked/linked in update excuses :-/ ** Also affects: iputils (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Changed in: iputils (Ubuntu) Status: New => Confirmed ** Also affects: ntpsec (Ubuntu) Importance:

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1892358] Re: autopkgtest success rate dropped inhibiting proposed migration

2020-08-20 Thread Christian Ehrhardt
Adding update-excuse tag so that one can find this issue from update-excuses page. To show up at the packages that fail I also add an qemu and kbd task (more might pile up) ** Changed in: qemu (Ubuntu) Status: New => Confirmed ** Also affects: kbd (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1892358] Re: autopkgtest success rate dropped inhibiting proposed migration

2020-08-20 Thread Christian Ehrhardt
Thank you Rbalint. Thanks to xnox I already found 1891716 and 1886886 which are sort of remotely related (to the next upload), I guess this bug will serve for the "marking systemd-fsckd test as flaky" task then. Can we do something about this bad fstab in LXD or is there a bug to track?

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1892358] [NEW] autopkgtest success rate dropped inhibiting proposed migration

2020-08-20 Thread Christian Ehrhardt
Public bug reported: Hi, we had such cases in the past like bug 1817721 for bionic and maybe bug 1892130 is about the same as well. There were more but I didn't want to search for all of them - what I checked is that there are no open ones clearly pointing out the recent further drop in

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1869796] Re: vague error during upgrade

2020-08-19 Thread Christian Ehrhardt
** Merge proposal linked: https://code.launchpad.net/~paelzer/ubuntu/+source/libvirt/+git/libvirt/+merge/389531 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to systemd in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1869796

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1891548] Re: autofs-ldap's /etc/ldap/schema/autofs.schema crashes slapd

2020-08-14 Thread Christian Ehrhardt
Adding slapd task since it is mentioned to break there. Seems to be a regression from 18.04 -> 20.04 as far as a I read it, tagging as such for now. @Andreas - any chance to recreate this on your side? ** Also affects: openldap (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1876486] Re: systemd breaks due to old libsecomp libs left on the system

2020-08-13 Thread Christian Ehrhardt
** Summary changed: - Kernel panic booting after 18.04 to 20.04 upgrade + systemd breaks due to old libsecomp libs left on the system -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to libseccomp in Ubuntu.

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1891158] Re: riscv64 build - hang at the end of the build with hanging "dbus-test-runner"

2020-08-13 Thread Christian Ehrhardt
The problem is Ubuntu only, as [1] is good. And the real fix should be in dbus-test-runner, but without repro it will be unclear if anyone gets to that or if we just hope it resolves itslef (again). But due to the above it makes no sense to submit the fix to Debian - as for them it would reduce

  1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   >