[Touch-packages] [Bug 1783881] Re: ltp-syscalls: msgstress03 / msgstress04 fails because systemd limits number of processes

2021-07-15 Thread Guilherme G. Piccoli
Observed in B/aws (kernel 4.15), cycle sru-20210621. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to systemd in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1783881 Title: ltp-syscalls: msgstress03 / msgstress04 fails because

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1783881] Re: ltp-syscalls: msgstress03 / msgstress04 fails because systemd limits number of processes

2021-07-15 Thread Guilherme G. Piccoli
Observed in B/aws (kernel 4.15), cycle sru-20210621. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to systemd in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1783881 Title: ltp-syscalls: msgstress03 / msgstress04 fails because

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1886790] Re: lxc 3.0.3-0ubuntu1~18.04.1 ADT test failure with B/5.4 kernels (device_add_remove_test)

2021-07-15 Thread Guilherme G. Piccoli
Observed this on B/oracle-5.4, cycle sru-20210621 . ** Tags added: oracle ** Also affects: ubuntu-kernel-tests Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to lxc in Ubuntu.

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1886790] Re: lxc 3.0.3-0ubuntu1~18.04.1 ADT test failure with B/5.4 kernels (device_add_remove_test)

2021-07-15 Thread Guilherme G. Piccoli
** Also affects: lxc Importance: Undecided Status: New ** No longer affects: lxc -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to lxc in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1886790 Title: lxc

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1886790] Re: lxc 3.0.3-0ubuntu1~18.04.1 ADT test failure with B/5.4 kernels (device_add_remove_test)

2021-07-15 Thread Guilherme G. Piccoli
Observed on B/aws-5.4 , cycle 20210621. ** Tags added: 5.4 aws bionic sru-20210621 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to lxc in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1886790 Title: lxc 3.0.3-0ubuntu1~18.04.1

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1783881] Re: ltp-syscalls: msgstress03 / msgstress04 fails because systemd limits number of processes

2021-07-15 Thread Guilherme G. Piccoli
Observed in B/aws-5.4, cycle sru-20210621. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to systemd in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1783881 Title: ltp-syscalls: msgstress03 / msgstress04 fails because systemd

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1886790] Re: lxc 3.0.3-0ubuntu1~18.04.1 ADT test failure with B/5.4 kernels (device_add_remove_test)

2021-07-06 Thread Guilherme G. Piccoli
** Summary changed: - lxc 3.0.3-0ubuntu1~18.04.1 ADT test failure with 5.4 kernels in Bionic + lxc 3.0.3-0ubuntu1~18.04.1 ADT test failure with B/5.4 kernels (device_add_remove_test) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1884024] Re: lxc-test-device-add-remove from ubuntu_lxc failed on B-5.4

2021-07-06 Thread Guilherme G. Piccoli
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 1886790 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1886790 ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 1886790 lxc 3.0.3-0ubuntu1~18.04.1 ADT test failure with 5.4 kernels in Bionic -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1783881] Re: ltp-syscalls: msgstress03 / msgstress04 fails because systemd limits number of processes

2021-06-21 Thread Guilherme G. Piccoli
Found on B-5.4/aws, cycle sru-20210531 . ** Tags added: sru-20210531 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to systemd in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1783881 Title: ltp-syscalls: msgstress03 /

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1884024] Re: lxc-test-device-add-remove from ubuntu_lxc failed on B-5.4

2021-06-21 Thread Guilherme G. Piccoli
Observed with B-5.4/aws, cycle sru-20210531 . ** Tags added: sru-20210531 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to lxc in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1884024 Title: lxc-test-device-add-remove from

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1917601] Re: lxc 1:4.0.4-0ubuntu3 ADT test failure with linux 5.8.0-45.51

2021-06-11 Thread Guilherme G. Piccoli
Issue observed for a long time in 5.8 kernels, for example G/KVM. ** Tags added: 5.8 groovy kvm sru-20210531 ** Tags added: sru-20210510 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to lxc in Ubuntu.

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1917601] Re: lxc 1:4.0.4-0ubuntu3 ADT test failure with linux 5.8.0-45.51

2021-06-11 Thread Guilherme G. Piccoli
Marked https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1900662 as duplicate of this one. Same issue, and seems (per Christian) that is fixed on 4.0.6 . -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to lxc in Ubuntu.

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1900008] Re: Sessions of screen does not keep running in background

2020-12-11 Thread Guilherme G. Piccoli
That's interesting, I just performed your suggested test, and I couldn't reproduce - it's a fresh Ubuntu 20.04 install, running MATE (not KDE!) and GNU screen 4.8.0-1. After closing the terminal, I've opened another one and "screen -x" worked fine, as expected. Could you try to use MATE / Gnome

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1573095] Re: Cloud images fail to boot when a serial port is not available

2020-11-19 Thread Guilherme G. Piccoli
Oh, so it's explained! Thanks Javier for the data. You're using an outdated version of the package that doesn't contain this fix. You need initramfs-tools version 0.122ubuntu8.17 - you can either try to get an updated cloud image, or after the first boot you may be able to update it (you could

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1573095] Re: Cloud images fail to boot when a serial port is not available

2020-11-19 Thread Guilherme G. Piccoli
Thanks for the report Javier! What version of initramfs-tools are you using ? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to initramfs-tools in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1573095 Title: Cloud images fail to

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1879980] Re: Fail to boot with LUKS on top of RAID1 if the array is broken/degraded

2020-11-03 Thread Guilherme G. Piccoli
John, thanks a lot for your report! Definitely we don't want to delay boots - although I'm happy to hear that eventually it boots. Can you send me logs so I can understand what's going on? My suggestion is to follow the steps below (as root user): (0) [optional] Force a log rotation, in order

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1830746] Re: memlock setting in systemd (pid 1) too low for containers (bionic)

2020-11-01 Thread Guilherme G. Piccoli
I was able to verify this bug with systemd from bionic-proposed (version 237-3ubuntu10.43) by following the procedure in the test case; it's working as expected, I can see 64M in the memlock limit. ** Tags removed: verification-needed verification-needed-bionic ** Tags added: verification-done

[Touch-packages] [Bug 120375] Re: cannot boot raid1 with only one disk

2020-10-22 Thread Guilherme G. Piccoli
This is a very old LP bug, but for completeness it worth mentioning here that recently some patches were merged on initramfs-tools and cryptsetup, that allow a good experience booting with LUKS-encrypted rootfs on top of a degraded RAID1 array; for details, please check:

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1879980] Re: Fail to boot with LUKS on top of RAID1 if the array is broken/degraded

2020-10-09 Thread Guilherme G. Piccoli
Thanks for releasing the packages in -proposed Lukasz. I was able to complete the validation for the Focal version, following the procedure in the description. An user reported internally to me that the verification of Bionic version was also successful, hence I'm hereby marking this LP as

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1573095] Re: Cloud images fail to boot when a serial port is not available

2020-10-08 Thread Guilherme G. Piccoli
ols (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Changed in: initramfs-tools (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided => Medium ** Changed in: initramfs-tools (Ubuntu) Status: New => Fix Released ** Changed in: initramfs-tools (Ubuntu) Assignee: (unassigned) => Guilherm

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1879980] Re: Fail to boot with LUKS on top of RAID1 if the array is broken/degraded

2020-10-06 Thread Guilherme G. Piccoli
Thanks a lot Alex for your review from a security point-of-view. And thanks again Lukasz for dealing with this SRU! Cheers, Guilherme -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to initramfs-tools in Ubuntu.

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1879980] Re: Fail to boot with LUKS on top of RAID1 if the array is broken/degraded

2020-09-22 Thread Guilherme G. Piccoli
Thanks a bunch mfo!! -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to initramfs-tools in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1879980 Title: Fail to boot with LUKS on top of RAID1 if the array is broken/degraded Status

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1879980] Re: Fail to boot with LUKS on top of RAID1 if the array is broken/degraded

2020-09-22 Thread Guilherme G. Piccoli
Hi Eric, all the changes are part of the same functionality - the local-bottom script for example is a clean-up for the files created in the local-top phase. I think it'd be unnecessary verbosity to explain file by file, and this bug is waiting for a long time to be fixed (especially due to the

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1879980] Re: Fail to boot with LUKS on top of RAID1 if the array is broken/degraded

2020-09-16 Thread Guilherme G. Piccoli
** Patch added: "bionic_cryptsetup_lp1879980.debdiff" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/focal/+source/mdadm/+bug/1879980/+attachment/5411486/+files/bionic_cryptsetup_lp1879980.debdiff -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1879980] Re: Fail to boot with LUKS on top of RAID1 if the array is broken/degraded

2020-09-16 Thread Guilherme G. Piccoli
** Patch added: "focal_cryptsetup_lp1879980_V2.debdiff" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/focal/+source/mdadm/+bug/1879980/+attachment/5411485/+files/focal_cryptsetup_lp1879980_V2.debdiff -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1879980] Re: Fail to boot with LUKS on top of RAID1 if the array is broken/degraded

2020-09-16 Thread Guilherme G. Piccoli
After the cryptsetup FTBFS investigation (on LP #1891473), coincidentally a security fix was released for such package, that included a fix for the FTBFS. So, this is a "rebase" on top of the latest version for Focal/Groovy - Bionic wasn't affected, but I'm re-uploading its debdiff

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1830746] Re: memlock setting in systemd (pid 1) too low for containers (bionic)

2020-09-11 Thread Guilherme G. Piccoli
** Patch added: "This is the (tested) debdiff with the proposed SRU, for Bionic only." https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/systemd/+bug/1830746/+attachment/5409870/+files/bionic_systemd_lp1830746.debdiff -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1830746] Re: memlock setting in systemd (pid 1) too low for containers (bionic)

2020-09-11 Thread Guilherme G. Piccoli
e/ubuntu/test1830746 ** Also affects: systemd (Ubuntu Focal) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Changed in: systemd (Ubuntu Focal) Status: New => Fix Released ** Changed in: systemd (Ubuntu Focal) Importance: Undecided => High ** Changed in: systemd (Ubuntu Focal)

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1830746] Re: memlock setting in systemd (pid 1) too low for containers (bionic)

2020-09-10 Thread Guilherme G. Piccoli
ystemd (Ubuntu Bionic) Importance: Undecided => High ** Changed in: systemd (Ubuntu Cosmic) Importance: Undecided => High ** Changed in: systemd (Ubuntu) Assignee: (unassigned) => Guilherme G. Piccoli (gpiccoli) ** Changed in: systemd (Ubuntu Disco) Importance: Undecided =>

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1879980] Re: Fail to boot with LUKS on top of RAID1 if the array is broken/degraded

2020-09-08 Thread Guilherme G. Piccoli
I've managed to verify the initramfs-tools Focal-proposed package (version 0.136ubuntu6.3) by following 2 approaches, given that we don't have its cryptsetup counter-part released yet: (a) The verification by "negation" aims to check if we don't have regression, by testing if the new package

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1879987] Re: machine get stuck at boot if specified 'console=ttyS* ' doesn't exist.

2020-09-08 Thread Guilherme G. Piccoli
I've tested the Focal-proposed initramfs-tools (version 0.136ubuntu6.3 ) according to the "Test Case" section in the description, and it's working as expected. Also, the armhf autopkgtest failure is no longer an issue (test was re-executed with success), so marking as verified! Cheers,

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1893675] Re: Autopkgtest failure on latest version of initramfs-tools - lack of partprobe

2020-09-08 Thread Guilherme G. Piccoli
The ARMHF testing was retried (thanks mfo!) and passed, likely flaky network issues during the test. Also, since Focal was successful to build and no issues on autopkgtest were reported (i.e., no test fails detected), I'm hereby marking this as verified. Cheers, Guilherme ** Tags removed:

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1893675] Re: Autopkgtest failure on latest version of initramfs-tools - lack of partprobe

2020-09-01 Thread Guilherme G. Piccoli
After discussing with Eric, seems initramfs-tools was "released" in Groovy (even with autopkgtest), so I'm hereby attaching an updated debdiff only with the autopkgtest fix. ** Patch added: "groovy_initramfs_lp1879980_lp1893675_V3.debdiff"

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1879987] Re: machine get stuck at boot if specified 'console=ttyS* ' doesn't exist.

2020-08-31 Thread Guilherme G. Piccoli
** Patch added: "focal_initramfs_lp1879980_V2.debdiff" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/initramfs-tools/+bug/1879987/+attachment/5406228/+files/focal_initramfs_lp1879980_V2.debdiff -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1879980] Re: Fail to boot with LUKS on top of RAID1 if the array is broken/degraded

2020-08-31 Thread Guilherme G. Piccoli
An issue on initramfs-tools autopkgtest was found in Groovy and Focal (see LP #1893675) - it's non-related with the fixes proposed here, but we need to make autopkgtest happy or we cannot get the package released, so here goes the V2 of the initramfs-tools debdiffs. Notice the SRU is mainly

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1879980] Re: Fail to boot with LUKS on top of RAID1 if the array is broken/degraded

2020-08-31 Thread Guilherme G. Piccoli
Worth to notice that the cryptsetup release is blocked on LP #1891473 - there's a failure on building this package from source introduced by a recent PPA builder upgrade (from Xenial to Bionic). -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1879980] Re: Fail to boot with LUKS on top of RAID1 if the array is broken/degraded

2020-08-31 Thread Guilherme G. Piccoli
** Patch added: "focal_initramfs_lp1879980_V2.debdiff" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/focal/+source/mdadm/+bug/1879980/+attachment/5406230/+files/focal_initramfs_lp1879980_V2.debdiff -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1879987] Re: machine get stuck at boot if specified 'console=ttyS* ' doesn't exist.

2020-08-31 Thread Guilherme G. Piccoli
An issue on initramfs-tools autopkgtest was found in Groovy and Focal (see LP #1893675) - it's non-related with the fixes proposed here, but we need to make autopkgtest happy or we cannot get the package released, so here goes the V2 of the initramfs-tools debdiffs. Notice the SRU is mainly

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1893675] Re: Autopkgtest failure on latest version of initramfs-tools - lack of partprobe

2020-08-31 Thread Guilherme G. Piccoli
Although the debdiffs are being hereby attached, the SRU track is ongoing in LPs #1879987 and #1879980. ** Patch added: "groovy_initramfs_lp1879980_V2.debdiff"

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1893675] Re: Autopkgtest failure on latest version of initramfs-tools - lack of partprobe

2020-08-31 Thread Guilherme G. Piccoli
** Patch added: "focal_initramfs_lp1879980_V2.debdiff" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/initramfs-tools/+bug/1893675/+attachment/5406204/+files/focal_initramfs_lp1879980_V2.debdiff -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1893675] Re: Autopkgtest failure on latest version of initramfs-tools - lack of partprobe

2020-08-31 Thread Guilherme G. Piccoli
** Description changed: [Impact] * Currently the initramfs-tools autopkgtest fails for at least AMD64, with the following signature: "mount: /tmp/autopkgtest.K1r92h/build.zdS/src/mnt: special device /dev/loop0p1 does not exist." * The reason for that is the test trying immediately to

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1893675] Re: Autopkgtest failure on latest version of initramfs-tools - lack of partprobe

2020-08-31 Thread Guilherme G. Piccoli
: Guilherme G. Piccoli (gpiccoli) Status: In Progress ** Also affects: initramfs-tools (Ubuntu Focal) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Changed in: initramfs-tools (Ubuntu Focal) Status: New => In Progress ** Changed in: initramfs-tools (Ubuntu Groovy) Importa

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1893675] [NEW] Autopkgtest failure on latest version of initramfs-tools - lack of partprobe

2020-08-31 Thread Guilherme G. Piccoli
test is not executed in Debian CI given that CI has no support for VMs, and this test requires that. ** Affects: initramfs-tools (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Assignee: Guilherme G. Piccoli (gpiccoli) Status: In Progress ** Tags: seg -- You received this bug notification beca

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1879987] Re: machine get stuck at boot if specified 'console=ttyS* ' doesn't exist.

2020-08-20 Thread Guilherme G. Piccoli
After about 10 weeks, finally my patch was merged by the Debian maintainer: https://salsa.debian.org/kernel-team/initramfs- tools/-/commit/c3cbf355 Cheers, Guilherme -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1879980] Re: Fail to boot with LUKS on top of RAID1 if the array is broken/degraded

2020-08-12 Thread Guilherme G. Piccoli
Attaching a new Bionic debdiff, which now includes a fix for a third bug (LP #1820929). ** Patch added: "bionic_initramfs_lp1879980_V2.debdiff" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/focal/+source/mdadm/+bug/1879980/+attachment/5401090/+files/bionic_initramfs_lp1879980_V2.debdiff -- You received

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1879987] Re: machine get stuck at boot if specified 'console=ttyS* ' doesn't exist.

2020-08-12 Thread Guilherme G. Piccoli
Attaching a new Bionic debdiff, which now includes a fix for a third bug (LP #1820929). ** Patch added: "bionic_initramfs_lp1879980_V2.debdiff" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/initramfs-tools/+bug/1879987/+attachment/5401089/+files/bionic_initramfs_lp1879980_V2.debdiff -- You

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1820929] Re: netplan should consider adding more udev attribute for exact matching of failover 3-netdev interfaces

2020-08-12 Thread Guilherme G. Piccoli
Although the debdiff is hereby attached, 3 bugs have fixes carried on such patch - the main work is done on LP ##1879980 (and the other LP handled in this SRU is #1879987) . ** Tags added: sts ** Description changed: - This bug is a follow-up to + [Impact] -

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1820929] Re: netplan should consider adding more udev attribute for exact matching of failover 3-netdev interfaces

2020-08-12 Thread Guilherme G. Piccoli
signed) => Guilherme G. Piccoli (gpiccoli) ** Changed in: initramfs-tools (Ubuntu Bionic) Assignee: Guilherme G. Piccoli (gpiccoli) => Jay Vosburgh (jvosburgh) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to ini

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1879980] Re: Fail to boot with LUKS on top of RAID1 if the array is broken/degraded

2020-08-04 Thread Guilherme G. Piccoli
Just got a test result from an user that reported the issue - the packages with the proposed patches [0] fixed the issue to him. cheers, Guilherme [0] https://launchpad.net/~gpiccoli/+archive/ubuntu/lp1879980 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1879987] Re: machine get stuck at boot if specified 'console=ttyS* ' doesn't exist.

2020-08-04 Thread Guilherme G. Piccoli
** Patch added: "focal_initramfs_lp1879980.debdiff" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/initramfs-tools/+bug/1879987/+attachment/5398703/+files/focal_initramfs_lp1879980.debdiff -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1879987] Re: machine get stuck at boot if specified 'console=ttyS* ' doesn't exist.

2020-08-04 Thread Guilherme G. Piccoli
** Patch added: "xenial_initramfs_lp1879987.debdiff" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/initramfs-tools/+bug/1879987/+attachment/5398705/+files/xenial_initramfs_lp1879987.debdiff -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1879987] Re: machine get stuck at boot if specified 'console=ttyS* ' doesn't exist.

2020-08-04 Thread Guilherme G. Piccoli
Worth to notice that the debdiffs (except Xenial's) include a fix for LP #1879980 - we are doing a single SRU for 2 bugs. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to initramfs-tools in Ubuntu.

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1879987] Re: machine get stuck at boot if specified 'console=ttyS* ' doesn't exist.

2020-08-04 Thread Guilherme G. Piccoli
** Patch added: "groovy_initramfs_lp1879980.debdiff" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/initramfs-tools/+bug/1879987/+attachment/5398702/+files/groovy_initramfs_lp1879980.debdiff -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1879987] Re: machine get stuck at boot if specified 'console=ttyS* ' doesn't exist.

2020-08-04 Thread Guilherme G. Piccoli
** Patch added: "bionic_initramfs_lp1879980.debdiff" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/initramfs-tools/+bug/1879987/+attachment/5398704/+files/bionic_initramfs_lp1879980.debdiff -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1879980] Re: Fail to boot with LUKS on top of RAID1 if the array is broken/degraded

2020-08-04 Thread Guilherme G. Piccoli
** Patch added: "focal_initramfs_lp1879980.debdiff" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/focal/+source/mdadm/+bug/1879980/+attachment/5398699/+files/focal_initramfs_lp1879980.debdiff -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1879980] Re: Fail to boot with LUKS on top of RAID1 if the array is broken/degraded

2020-08-04 Thread Guilherme G. Piccoli
** Patch added: "groovy_cryptsetup_lp1879980.debdiff" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/focal/+source/mdadm/+bug/1879980/+attachment/5398696/+files/groovy_cryptsetup_lp1879980.debdiff -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1879980] Re: Fail to boot with LUKS on top of RAID1 if the array is broken/degraded

2020-08-04 Thread Guilherme G. Piccoli
** Patch added: "bionic_initramfs_lp1879980.debdiff" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/focal/+source/mdadm/+bug/1879980/+attachment/5398701/+files/bionic_initramfs_lp1879980.debdiff -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1879980] Re: Fail to boot with LUKS on top of RAID1 if the array is broken/degraded

2020-08-04 Thread Guilherme G. Piccoli
** Patch added: "groovy_initramfs_lp1879980.debdiff" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/focal/+source/mdadm/+bug/1879980/+attachment/5398697/+files/groovy_initramfs_lp1879980.debdiff -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1879980] Re: Fail to boot with LUKS on top of RAID1 if the array is broken/degraded

2020-08-04 Thread Guilherme G. Piccoli
** Patch added: "focal_cryptsetup_lp1879980.debdiff" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/focal/+source/mdadm/+bug/1879980/+attachment/5398698/+files/focal_cryptsetup_lp1879980.debdiff -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1879980] Re: Fail to boot with LUKS on top of RAID1 if the array is broken/degraded

2020-08-04 Thread Guilherme G. Piccoli
Worth to notice that the initramfs-tools debdiffs include a fix for LP #1879987 - we are doing a single SRU for 2 bugs. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to initramfs-tools in Ubuntu.

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1879980] Re: Fail to boot with LUKS on top of RAID1 if the array is broken/degraded

2020-08-04 Thread Guilherme G. Piccoli
One relevant discussion would be why we decided to not change mdadm code anymore. What happens here is that we have an inter-dependency between mdadm and cryptroot - we first changed the mdadm max counter to "untangle" that relation, in a way cryptroot would run more times than mdadm. But

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1879980] Re: Fail to boot with LUKS on top of RAID1 if the array is broken/degraded

2020-08-04 Thread Guilherme G. Piccoli
** Patch added: "bionic_cryptsetup_lp1879980.debdiff" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/focal/+source/mdadm/+bug/1879980/+attachment/5398700/+files/bionic_cryptsetup_lp1879980.debdiff -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1879980] Re: Fail to boot with LUKS on top of RAID1 if the array is broken/degraded

2020-08-04 Thread Guilherme G. Piccoli
Oh, I forgot to mention - Xenial won't be fixed. It's a release pretty stable with less then a year remaining of regular support, and with older code. So, in my opinion (again) it's safer to keep it as is, and consider that degraded RAID1 + encrypted rootfs is fully supported on Bionic and so

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1879980] Re: Fail to boot with LUKS on top of RAID1 if the array is broken/degraded

2020-08-04 Thread Guilherme G. Piccoli
** Description changed: [Impact] - * Considering a setup of a encrypted rootfs on top of md RAID1 device, Ubuntu is currently unable to decrypt the rootfs if the array gets degraded, like for example if one of the array members gets removed. + * Considering a setup of a encrypted rootfs on

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1879980] Re: Fail to boot with LUKS on top of RAID1 if the array is broken/degraded

2020-08-04 Thread Guilherme G. Piccoli
** Changed in: mdadm (Ubuntu) Status: Confirmed => Opinion ** Changed in: initramfs-tools (Ubuntu) Status: Confirmed => In Progress ** Also affects: mdadm (Ubuntu Groovy) Importance: Medium Assignee: Guilherme G. Piccoli (gpiccoli) Status: Opinion ** Also a

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1879987] Re: machine get stuck at boot if specified 'console=ttyS* ' doesn't exist.

2020-07-23 Thread Guilherme G. Piccoli
** Description changed: - kernel get stucks at boot if console=ttyS* is specified in the kernel - cmdline and that serial HW isn't available on the system. + [Impact] - Reproduced with: - 4.4 (from Xenial), 4.15 (from Bionic), 5.4 (native, Focal) and 5.7-next (mainline) + * Currently, if

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1879987] Re: machine get stuck at boot if specified 'console=ttyS* ' doesn't exist.

2020-07-23 Thread Guilherme G. Piccoli
Let me clarify why I'm un-marking this as duplicate of #1573095. This LP bug is indeed a duplicate of #1573095, but we have a lot of noise there, and potentially multiple different issues reported. The main one is the wrong ttySX causing the infinite loop in initramfs-tools due to error on write.

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1879987] Re: machine get stuck at boot if specified 'console=ttyS* ' doesn't exist.

2020-07-23 Thread Guilherme G. Piccoli
ded Status: New ** Also affects: initramfs-tools (Ubuntu Trusty) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Also affects: initramfs-tools (Ubuntu Groovy) Importance: High Assignee: Guilherme G. Piccoli (gpiccoli) Status: In Progress ** Changed in: initramfs-tools (Ubuntu E

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1392317] Re: Incorrect order of messages with RepeatedMsgReduction on

2020-07-15 Thread Guilherme G. Piccoli
Thanks Roger and Kobus for your report! Do you know if the problem persists on Xenial (16.04) or later Ubuntu releases? We don't support fixes for Trusty anymore except for security ones, so I've marked as "won't fix". In case you can reproduce with newer versions, let us know. Cheers,

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1879980] Re: Fail to boot with LUKS on top of RAID1 if the array is broken/degraded

2020-07-14 Thread Guilherme G. Piccoli
** Changed in: cryptsetup (Ubuntu) Status: Confirmed => In Progress ** Bug watch added: Debian Bug tracker #933059 https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=933059 ** Also affects: cryptsetup (Debian) via https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=933059

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1879980] Re: Fail to boot with LUKS on top of RAID1 if the array is broken/degraded

2020-07-08 Thread Guilherme G. Piccoli
Debian merge request for the cryptsetup patch was just submitted: https://salsa.debian.org/cryptsetup-team/cryptsetup/-/merge_requests/18 Cheers, Guilherme -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to initramfs-tools in

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1879980] Re: Fail to boot with LUKS on top of RAID1 if the array is broken/degraded

2020-06-02 Thread Guilherme G. Piccoli
** Description changed: - Description will be saved for further SRU template, the details of the - issue will be exposed in comments + [Impact] + * Considering a setup of a encrypted rootfs on top of md RAID1 device, Ubuntu is currently unable to decrypt the rootfs if the array gets degraded,

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1879980] Re: Fail to boot with LUKS on top of RAID1 if the array is broken/degraded

2020-05-26 Thread Guilherme G. Piccoli
I have a report of a Bionic user that tested the packages on my PPA with success. I changed a small bit though, from the first proposal (just for consistency): moved the cryptsetup clean-up script to local-bottom instead of init-bottom. Thanks, Guilherme -- You received this bug

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1879987] Re: machine get stuck at boot if specified 'console=ttyS* ' doesn't exist.

2020-05-25 Thread Guilherme G. Piccoli
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 1573095 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1573095 Although this is closed as dup, I thought would be good to clarify why Debian Buster doesn't reproduce (at first). What happens is that Debian includes the fsck on initrd by default, and in Ubuntu that

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1879980] Re: Fail to boot with LUKS on top of RAID1 if the array is broken/degraded

2020-05-22 Thread Guilherme G. Piccoli
List of somewhat duplicate bugs: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/mdadm/+bug/120375 (after comment #74) https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/cryptsetup/+bug/251164 (propose some alternative solutions we can think about, like failure hooks)

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1879980] Re: Fail to boot with LUKS on top of RAID1 if the array is broken/degraded

2020-05-22 Thread Guilherme G. Piccoli
Not a debdiff - I found easier to just add the patches as in my local git repository of the packages. ** Patch added: "cryptroot patch"

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1879980] Re: Fail to boot with LUKS on top of RAID1 if the array is broken/degraded

2020-05-22 Thread Guilherme G. Piccoli
** Patch added: "mdadm patch" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/initramfs-tools/+bug/1879980/+attachment/5375736/+files/0001-script.local-block-Improve-last-resort-mechanism.patch -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1879980] Re: Fail to boot with LUKS on top of RAID1 if the array is broken/degraded

2020-05-22 Thread Guilherme G. Piccoli
** Patch added: "initramfs-tools patch" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/initramfs-tools/+bug/1879980/+attachment/5375735/+files/0001-scripts-local-Allow-local-block-looping-as-Debian.patch -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1879980] Re: Fail to boot with LUKS on top of RAID1 if the array is broken/degraded

2020-05-22 Thread Guilherme G. Piccoli
The issue basically is about a failure in mounting root if we have a stacked setup of LUKS on top of RAID1, when RAID1 is degraded (like a member missing). What happens in detail is a conjuncture of factors leading to this problem: (a) The initramfs script for cryptroot currently is present in

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1879987] Re: machine get stuck at boot if specified 'console=ttyS* ' doesn't exist.

2020-05-22 Thread Guilherme G. Piccoli
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 1573095 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1573095 Sorry, dup of LP #1573095. ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 1573095 Cloud images fail to boot when a serial port is not available -- You received this bug notification because you are a

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1879987] Re: machine get stuck at boot if specified 'console=ttyS* ' doesn't exist.

2020-05-22 Thread Guilherme G. Piccoli
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 1573095 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1573095 Eric, I'll close this LP as dup of #1879987 - seems it's the same issue. I'll try also the Debian release top see what's different there...we can comment in the other bug about Debian status and what are

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1879987] Re: machine get stuck at boot if specified 'console=ttyS* ' doesn't exist.

2020-05-21 Thread Guilherme G. Piccoli
This was greatly debugged by LP user WGH in https://bugs.launchpad.net /cloud-images/+bug/1573095/comments/46 - it's really a flaw on initramfs, I managed to workaround the issue with "quiet" parameter (system boots normally ,even with the wrong serial console). Investigation continues... I guess

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1879980] [NEW] Fail to boot with LUKS on top of RAID1 if the array is broken/degraded

2020-05-21 Thread Guilherme G. Piccoli
Public bug reported: Description will be saved for further SRU template, the details of the issue will be exposed in comments ** Affects: cryptsetup (Ubuntu) Importance: Medium Assignee: Guilherme G. Piccoli (gpiccoli) Status: Confirmed ** Affects: initramfs-tools (Ubuntu

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1771557] Re: NVMe boot drives not supported - failing in generating initramfs

2018-05-18 Thread Guilherme G. Piccoli
Thanks a lot Eric and Brian for handling the SRU process. I just tested the packages initramfs-tools and initramfs-tools-bin version 0.103ubuntu4.11, from trusty-proposed, following the test procedure of this LP's description. Everything is working fine, so I'll mark this as verification-done.

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1771557] Re: NVMe boot drives not supported - failing in generating initramfs

2018-05-16 Thread Guilherme G. Piccoli
This solution was suggested by Szilard Cserey and further improved by Dan Streetman - thanks both! ** Patch added: "lp1771557_v1.debdiff" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/initramfs-tools/+bug/1771557/+attachment/5140444/+files/lp1771557_v1.debdiff -- You received this bug

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1771557] Re: NVMe boot drives not supported - failing in generating initramfs

2018-05-16 Thread Guilherme G. Piccoli
** Description changed: - [Impact] - The initramfs-tools hook-functions script cannot translate nvmeXnYpZ to nvmeXnY block device, so it's failing and not building the initram disk. + [Impact] - Upstream solution is composed for at least 2 patches (it's a series, but + When creating the

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1771557] Re: NVMe boot drives not supported - failing in generating initramfs

2018-05-16 Thread Guilherme G. Piccoli
** Changed in: initramfs-tools (Ubuntu) Status: In Progress => Fix Released ** Changed in: initramfs-tools (Ubuntu) Importance: High => Medium ** Changed in: initramfs-tools (Ubuntu) Milestone: trusty-updates => None -- You received this bug notification because you are a member

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1771557] Re: NVMe boot drives not supported - failing in generating initramfs

2018-05-16 Thread Guilherme G. Piccoli
mportance: Undecided => High ** Changed in: initramfs-tools (Ubuntu Trusty) Status: New => In Progress ** Changed in: initramfs-tools (Ubuntu Trusty) Assignee: (unassigned) => Guilherme G. Piccoli (gpiccoli) ** Changed in: initramfs-tools (Ubuntu Trusty) Milestone: None => tr

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1750013] Re: systemd-logind: memory leaks on session's connections (trusty-only)

2018-04-19 Thread Guilherme G. Piccoli
As mentioned by Dan in the above comments, some failures in autopkgtest like: autopkgtest [14:44:48]: test ubuntu-regression-suite: [--- Source Package Version: 4.4.0-1017.17 Running Kernel Version: 3.13.0-145.194 ERROR: running version does not match source package Are

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1303649] Re: systemd-logind spins in cgmanager_ping_sync()

2018-04-15 Thread Guilherme G. Piccoli
Thanks a lot for your feedback Marcelo; I'm glad everything seems fine now. Cheers, Guilherme -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to lxc in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1303649 Title: systemd-logind

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1303649] Re: systemd-logind spins in cgmanager_ping_sync()

2018-04-12 Thread Guilherme G. Piccoli
For the folks that observed the recent cgmanager issue with logind: there's a new systemd version in -proposed; it's version "204-5ubuntu20.28". I've just tested it with and without cgmanager, in kernels 4.4.0-119 and 3.13.0-145 (according to LP #1750013), and didn't observe any constant CPU

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1750013] Re: systemd-logind: memory leaks on session's connections (trusty-only)

2018-04-12 Thread Guilherme G. Piccoli
Hi Łukasz, thanks for the heads-up. I just tested systemd from -proposed, version 204-5ubuntu20.28 and it fixes the issue reported in this LP. The test consists in doing multiple SSHs in a loop (better explained in the description). I've run the test with and without cgmanager installed, in

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1750013] Re: systemd-logind: memory leaks on session's connections (trusty-only)

2018-04-03 Thread Guilherme G. Piccoli
Dan, this is the v3 of the patch. I bumped the version to 20.28 since my proposed 20.27 caused the regression aforementioned. For this version, I removed the dependency of cgmanager, along with the code that added closing sessions to garbage collector. Happens that a similar code is present on

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1303649] Re: systemd-logind spins in cgmanager_ping_sync()

2018-04-03 Thread Guilherme G. Piccoli
Folks that are experiencing this issue: the best way to circumvent it for now I guess it's downgrade systemd package to version 204-5ubuntu20.26 and remove cgmanager. To remove cgmanager: "sudo apt-get remove cgmanager" To downgrade systemd version: "sudo apt-get install systemd-

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1750013] Re: systemd-logind: memory leaks on session's connections (trusty-only)

2018-04-02 Thread Guilherme G. Piccoli
Thank you Mauro! One thing that worth to take a look is that you're using kernel 3.13, and this could be related to the high CPU utilization issue you're observing. We're changing the approach of this fix to not rely on cgmanager anymore. The CPU utilization issue is however another bug that

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1303649] Re: systemd-logind spins in cgmanager_ping_sync()

2018-03-12 Thread Guilherme G. Piccoli
Thanks Dale and Marcelo for your quick report - this is really useful. The problem seem to be caused due to cgmanager being added as dependency of systemd in -proposed - this request was clearly explained in LP #1750013 (not a dup for this, it's another issue with systemd-logind). During my test

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1750013] Re: systemd-logind: memory leaks on session's connections (trusty-only)

2018-03-12 Thread Guilherme G. Piccoli
Thanks Stéphane, the 2nd point is a reasonable consideration. Regardless if I could provide a fix to cgmanager for the regression, certainly it won't be added again as a dependency. Cheers, Guilherme -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1750013] Re: systemd-logind: memory leaks on session's connections (trusty-only)

2018-03-12 Thread Guilherme G. Piccoli
We had a potential regression reported after some users installed this package from -proposed. The reports starts on comment #17 in LP: #1303649 . Summary: users are reporting high CPU loads from both systemd-logind and cgmanager processes, as well as delays in logins. I'm investigating to

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1750013] Re: systemd-logind: memory leaks on session's connections (trusty-only)

2018-03-09 Thread Guilherme G. Piccoli
Thanks Dan and Brian. Just tested: after 1h and more than 5500 SSH sessions, no leaks at all were observed. (As a comparison, testing the "old" version 20.26 I got 1.8 MB of leak in half an hour!) Cheers, Guilherme ** Tags removed: sts-sru-needed verification-needed

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1750013] Re: systemd-logind: memory leaks on session's connections (trusty-only)

2018-03-05 Thread Guilherme G. Piccoli
Thanks Dan. About cgmanager: if we don't have it installed, it does not affect memory of systemd-logind tool per se. What happens, IMHO, is even more severe: we don't free/de-allocate sysfs cgroup paths for sessions. So, in my tests _without_ cgmanager, after 8000 SSH sessions to my target

  1   2   >