[Touch-packages] [Bug 1947099] Re: ipconfig does not honour user-requested timeouts in some cases

2022-03-21 Thread Khaled El Mously
A [ Regression potential ] section was added to the description. @Łukasz Zemczak let me know if there are other details you would like. Thank you! ** Description changed: - [Impact] In some cases, ipconfig can take a longer time than the user-specified timeouts, causing unexpected delays.

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1947099] Re: ipconfig does not honour user-requested timeouts in some cases

2022-03-21 Thread Khaled El Mously
Hello @Łukasz Zemczak I understand your concern about breaking existing behaviour. I would like to clarify 2 things: 1) The change introduced here only ensures that user-requested timeouts are never exceeded. That means that if something is currently accepting DHCP offers after the specified t

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1964527] [NEW] Enable CONFIG_UNICODE for linux-gcp

2022-03-10 Thread Khaled El Mously
Public bug reported: See https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/kernel-team/2022-March/128565.html NOTE: This config is enabled in other gcp kernels and in non-gcp kernels. ** Affects: linux-gcp (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Assignee: Khaled El Mously (kmously) Status: New

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1959173] [NEW] Vulnerability in af_packet handling

2022-01-26 Thread Khaled El Mously
Public bug reported: CVE-2021-22600 A vulnerability, which was classified as critical, was found in Linux Kernel. Affected is the function packet_set_ring of the file net/packet/af_packet.c. The manipulation with an unknown input leads to a memory corruption vulnerability. This is going to have a

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1957744] [NEW] Unable to set correct resolutions on virtual displays

2022-01-12 Thread Khaled El Mously
Public bug reported: See https://canonical.lightning.force.com/lightning/r/Case/5004K09qFamQAE/view for more info ** Affects: linux-oracle (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Affects: linux-oracle (Ubuntu Hirsute) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Af

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1953575] [NEW] Update gvnic driver code

2021-12-07 Thread Khaled El Mously
5ab296 gve: Use dev_info/err instead of netif_info/err. 613ed2d16246f gve: Add stats for gve. 250d220740d21 gve: Get and set Rx copybreak via ethtool ** Affects: linux-gcp (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Assignee: Khaled El Mously (kmously) Status: In Progress ** Affects: linux-g

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1947099] Re: ipconfig does not honour user-requested timeouts in some cases

2021-12-05 Thread Khaled El Mously
Patch proposed upstream: https://lists.zytor.com/archives/klibc/2021-December/004629.html -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to klibc in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1947099 Title: ipconfig does not ho

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1947099] Re: ipconfig does not honour user-requested timeouts in some cases

2021-11-18 Thread Khaled El Mously
(updated the bug description with further details according to the SRU template, including reproduction steps) ** Description changed: ** SRU TEMPLATE DRAFT ** [Impact] + In some cases, ipconfig can take a longer time than the user-specified timeouts, causing unexpected delays. + + [Test

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1947099] Re: ipconfig does not honour user-requested timeouts in some cases

2021-11-17 Thread Khaled El Mously
Hello @Eric. > What make Bionic more susceptible to this particular problem ? Bionic kernel version in use ? else ? I believe klibc/ipconfig itself is susceptible to the problem in Bionic and Focal and elsewhere. However, Focal (which uses klibc 2.0.7) uses dhclient for networking initialization

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1947099] Re: ipconfig does not honour user-requested timeouts in some cases

2021-11-16 Thread Khaled El Mously
Hi @Eric - thanks for the follow-up and sorry for the delayed reply. > I don't see this piece of code in the klibc upstream project[0] Are you referring to the piece of code that I am suggesting as a fix? If so, it makes sense that it doesn't exist elsewhere, which is why I am suggesting it be in

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1947099] Re: ipconfig does not honour user-requested timeouts in some cases

2021-10-14 Thread Khaled El Mously
For some background info, this issue is affecting one of the instance types of a cloud partner. The instance has 18 physical ethernet interfaces (bonded), but only one of which has a media connection. On boot-up, ipconfig is called to do DHCP for all 18 devices. 17 of them fail to send a DHCP reque

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1947099] Re: ipconfig does not honour user-requested timeouts in some cases

2021-10-13 Thread Khaled El Mously
Adding a debdiff of the patch as well. I am not sure if I generated it correctly though.. ** Patch added: "Suggested patch that fixes the problem" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/klibc/+bug/1947099/+attachment/5532730/+files/honour-user-requested-timeouts-in-all-cases.patch -- You

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1947099] Re: ipconfig does not honour user-requested timeouts in some cases

2021-10-13 Thread Khaled El Mously
** Description changed: In some cases, ipconfig can take longer than the user-specified timeouts, causing unexpected delays. in main.c, in function loop(), the process can go into process_timeout_event() (or process_receive_event() ) and if it encounters an error situation, will set a

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1947099] [NEW] ipconfig does not honour user-requested timeouts in some cases

2021-10-13 Thread Khaled El Mously
Public bug reported: In some cases, ipconfig can take longer than the user-specified timeouts, causing unexpected delays. in main.c, in function loop(), the process can go into process_timeout_event() (or process_receive_event() ) and if it encounters an error situation, will set an attempt to "t

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1875665] Re: rtkit-daemon[*]: Failed to make ourselves RT: Operation not permitted after upgrade to 20.04

2020-05-14 Thread Khaled El Mously
** Changed in: linux-azure (Ubuntu Focal) Status: New => Fix Committed ** Changed in: linux-gcp (Ubuntu Focal) Status: New => Fix Committed ** Changed in: linux-kvm (Ubuntu Focal) Status: New => Fix Committed ** Changed in: linux-oracle (Ubuntu Focal) Status: New => F

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1875665] Re: rtkit-daemon[*]: Failed to make ourselves RT: Operation not permitted after upgrade to 20.04

2020-05-13 Thread Khaled El Mously
** Changed in: linux (Ubuntu Focal) Status: Confirmed => Fix Committed -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to rtkit in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1875665 Title: rtkit-daemon[*]: Failed to make o

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1860956] Re: network-manager 1.16.0-0ubuntu2 ADT test failure with linux 5.0.0-40.44

2020-01-27 Thread Khaled El Mously
Thanks Sebastien. This is from Disco actually. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to network-manager in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1860956 Title: network-manager 1.16.0-0ubuntu2 ADT test failure with

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1860956] [NEW] network-manager 1.16.0-0ubuntu2 ADT test failure with linux 5.0.0-40.44

2020-01-26 Thread Khaled El Mously
Public bug reported: Testing failed on: ppc64el: https://objectstorage.prodstack4-5.canonical.com/v1/AUTH_77e2ada1e7a84929a74ba3b87153c0ac/autopkgtest-disco/disco/ppc64el/n/network-manager/20200124_174131_d1990@/log.gz ** Affects: network-manager (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1847536] [NEW] systemd 240-6ubuntu5.7 ADT test failure with linux-oracle 5.0.0-1004.8

2019-10-09 Thread Khaled El Mously
Public bug reported: Testing failed on: amd64: https://objectstorage.prodstack4-5.canonical.com/v1/AUTH_77e2ada1e7a84929a74ba3b87153c0ac/autopkgtest-disco/disco/amd64/s/systemd/20191009_032712_a8451@/log.gz ** Affects: systemd (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Tag

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1815172] Re: [bionic] drm/i915: softpin broken, needs to be fixed for 32bit mesa

2019-08-11 Thread Khaled El Mously
** Changed in: mesa (Ubuntu Bionic) Status: In Progress => Fix Committed -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to mesa in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1815172 Title: [bionic] drm/i915: softpin broke

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1818204] Re: Qualcomm Atheros QCA9377 wireless does not work

2019-03-27 Thread Khaled El Mously
** Also affects: network-manager (Ubuntu Cosmic) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Also affects: linux (Ubuntu Cosmic) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Also affects: network-manager (Ubuntu Bionic) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Also affects: linux (Ubu

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1802135] Re: broken touchpad after i2c-i801 blacklist change

2018-12-30 Thread Khaled El Mously
Marking this as invalid for Xenial based on Aaron Ma's comment in https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/kernel-team/2018-December/097439.html ** Changed in: linux (Ubuntu Xenial) Status: Confirmed => Won't Fix ** Changed in: linux (Ubuntu Xenial) Status: Won't Fix => Invalid -- You re

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1802135] Re: broken touchpad after i2c-i801 blacklist change

2018-12-29 Thread Khaled El Mously
** Changed in: linux (Ubuntu Bionic) Status: Confirmed => Fix Committed ** Changed in: linux (Ubuntu Cosmic) Status: Confirmed => Fix Committed -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to kmod in Ubuntu. htt

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1805955] Re: systemd 237-3ubuntu10.9 ADT test failure with linux-gcp 4.15.0-1025.26

2018-11-29 Thread Khaled El Mously
There's a new test in this version of adt, "TEST-22-TMPFILES". It looks like this test fails because there's a permission problem on the test script itself "test.sh" -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to systemd in U

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1805955] [NEW] systemd 237-3ubuntu10.9 ADT test failure with linux-gcp 4.15.0-1025.26

2018-11-29 Thread Khaled El Mously
Public bug reported: Testing failed on: amd64: https://objectstorage.prodstack4-5.canonical.com/v1/AUTH_77e2ada1e7a84929a74ba3b87153c0ac/autopkgtest-bionic/bionic/amd64/s/systemd/20181123_064313_f146e@/log.gz ** Affects: systemd (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** T

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1771783] Re: iproute2: frr route protocols are not converted to string on xenial

2018-07-02 Thread Khaled El Mously
Proposed fix for lp #1771764 and lp #1771783 Please ignore the first proposal. ** Patch added: "proposed-fix-1771764-1771783.debdiff" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/iproute2/+bug/1771783/+attachment/5159000/+files/proposed-fix-1771764-1771783.debdiff -- You received this bug noti

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1771764] Re: iproute2: unable to add ip lwt mpls route on xenial

2018-07-02 Thread Khaled El Mously
Proposed fix for lp #1771764 and lp #1771783 ** Patch added: "proposed-fix-1771764-1771783.debdiff" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/iproute2/+bug/1771764/+attachment/5158998/+files/proposed-fix-1771764-1771783.debdiff -- You received this bug notification because you are a member o

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1771783] Re: iproute2: frr route protocols are not converted to string on xenial

2018-06-26 Thread Khaled El Mously
** Patch added: "proposed-patch-1.debdiff" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/iproute2/+bug/1771783/+attachment/5156893/+files/proposed-patch-1.debdiff -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to iproute2 in Ubu

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1746463] Re: apparmor profile load in stacked policy container fails

2018-02-03 Thread Khaled El Mously
** Changed in: apparmor (Ubuntu Artful) Status: Confirmed => Fix Committed -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to apparmor in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1746463 Title: apparmor profile load in s

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1729145] Re: /dev/bcache/by-uuid links not created after reboot

2018-02-01 Thread Khaled El Mously
** Changed in: linux (Ubuntu Xenial) Status: In Progress => Fix Committed ** Changed in: linux (Ubuntu Artful) Status: In Progress => Fix Committed -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to systemd in Ubun

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1731467] Re: Cannot pair BLE remote devices when using combo BT SoC

2017-11-29 Thread Khaled El Mously
This bug is awaiting verification that the kernel in -proposed solves the problem. Please test the kernel and update this bug with the results. If the problem is solved, change the tag 'verification-needed- artful' to 'verification-done-artful'. If the problem still exists, change the tag 'verifica

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1731467] Re: Cannot pair BLE remote devices when using combo BT SoC

2017-11-28 Thread Khaled El Mously
This bug is awaiting verification that the kernel in -proposed solves the problem. Please test the kernel and update this bug with the results. If the problem is solved, change the tag 'verification-needed- xenial' to 'verification-done-xenial'. If the problem still exists, change the tag 'verifica

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1731467] Re: Cannot pair BLE remote devices when using combo BT SoC

2017-11-28 Thread Khaled El Mously
This bug is awaiting verification that the kernel in -proposed solves the problem. Please test the kernel and update this bug with the results. If the problem is solved, change the tag 'verification-needed- zesty' to 'verification-done-zesty'. If the problem still exists, change the tag 'verificati