** Also affects: linux (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to network-manager in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2080489
Title:
Network Manager stops fun
** Also affects: systemd (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
** Tags added: rls-jj-incoming
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to systemd in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2077159
Title:
** Also affects: network-manager (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
** Tags added: foundations-todo
** Changed in: network-manager (Ubuntu Oracular)
Status: New => Triaged
** Changed in: network-manager (Ubuntu Oracular)
Importance: Undecided => Medium
--
You receiv
** Tags removed: foundations-todo
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to network-manager in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2019940
Title:
Directly manipulating NetworkManager keyfiles
Status in augeas pac
** Changed in: network-manager (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided => Low
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to network-manager in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2032824
Title:
Veth pairs fail activation on
** Changed in: network-manager (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Triaged
** Changed in: network-manager (Ubuntu Jammy)
Status: New => Triaged
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to network-manager in Ubuntu.
http
** Tags added: foundations-todo
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to network-manager in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2032824
Title:
Veth pairs fail activation on Jammy
Status in network-manager packag
** Tags added: fr-8841
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to network-manager in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2032824
Title:
Veth pairs fail activation on Jammy
Status in network-manager package in Ubun
I wonder if Netplan should modify files in /usr/lib/netplan/ at all?
Yes, it needs to read those files, to get a full view of the
configuration. But writing should probably be limited to /run/ and
/etc/netplan/ ...
** Also affects: ubuntu-settings (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided
Status: N
This sounds like it needs a backported feature for systemd-networkd in
Focal, i.e. something that got fixed in networkd.
Did you try adding the "on-link: true" setting to your static routes in
the Netplan configuration? That might be able to work around the issue.
** Changed in: netplan.io (Ubunt
You can put your trunk (enp3s0) as "optional: true" and it will still
wait for the vlans to be up. We might consider marking interfaces with
empty configuration (like "enp3s0: {}") to be "optional: true" by
default...
** Changed in: netplan
Status: Fix Committed => Fix Released
--
You rec
You filed the bug report against NetworkManager. But the "up.d" hook is
called differently in NM, see https://netplan.io/faq#use-pre-up-post-up-
etc-hook-scripts
If this is about /etc/network/if-up.d then it should be targeted towards
the "ifupdown" package. I'm adding a corresponding bug task.
*
Let me mark it as invalid as I also already opened a bug ticket at the
debian bug tracker as we have the same results there as well. Probably
doesn't make sense to double track bugtickets then in this case, thanks!
** Changed in: krb5 (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Invalid
--
You received this b
** Description changed:
We have a scenario where we need to disable reverse lookups for
canonicalization in Kerberos as the customer's PTR records are not
consistent and lead to wrongly requested SPNs otherwise (see
https://web.mit.edu/kerberos/krb5-latest/doc/admin/princ_dns.html#reverse-
** No longer affects: kerberos
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to krb5 in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2063443
Title:
krb5.conf seems to ignore rdns = false
Status in krb5 package in Ubuntu:
New
** Description changed:
We have a scenario where we need to disable reverse lookups for
canonicalization in Kerberos as the customer's PTR records are not
- consistent and lead to wrongly requested SPNs otherwise.
+ consistent and lead to wrongly requested SPNs otherwise (see
+ https://web.mit
** Project changed: launchpad => kerberos
** Also affects: krb5 (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to krb5 in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2063443
Tit
** Changed in: netplan
Status: In Progress => Fix Committed
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to systemd in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2060311
Title:
Setting "optional: true" to overcome he ti
Arguably, the "/usr/lib/netplan/00-network-manager-all.yaml" should be
shipped by the network-manager package, instead of ubuntu-settings...
The community flavors using Calamares, might be covered by this PR:
https://github.com/calamares/calamares/pull/2284
** Also affects: ubuntu-settings (Ubunt
** Also affects: e2fsprogs (Ubuntu Noble)
Importance: Critical
Assignee: Matthew Ruffell (mruffell)
Status: In Progress
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to e2fsprogs in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad
** Also affects: systemd (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to systemd in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2055012
Title:
When I upgraded from 22.04 to 2
** Changed in: network-manager (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Invalid
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to network-manager in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2045096
Title:
Error in network definition: In
Thanks for the additional details!
In this case the output of "resolvectl" after "netplan apply" and after
resume (no "netplan apply") might be useful. In addition to debug-logs
of your systemd-resolved
$ sudo systemctl edit systemd-resolved
Adding:
```
[Service]
Environment=SYSTEMD_LOG_LEVEL=d
I didn't hear about any blocker and in the "Foundation Leadership Sync"
meeting people were overall positive about the change. I'm dropping the
"block-proposed" tag.
** Tags removed: block-proposed
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, wh
** Changed in: netplan.io (Ubuntu Noble)
Status: In Progress => Fix Committed
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to systemd in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2060311
Title:
Setting "optional: true"
Extensive testing, from different teams and individuals, has happened in
this bug report and especially in the upstream PR
https://github.com/canonical/netplan/pull/456. This is in addition to
the newly added build-time tests and autopkgtests.
This change affects the "systemd-networkd-wait-online"
signee: (unassigned) => Lukas Märdian (slyon)
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to systemd in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2060311
Title:
Setting "optional: true" to overcome he timeout "Job
> In the past it was okay to NOT have "optional: true" set for both: encc000
> and encc000.2653 (and I found that logical, since both interfaces are needed
> in a VLAN context).
>
> Knowing now what's missing, I could live with that (even if it's a change in
> behavior).
Interesting.. I suspec
With version ~ppa5 we're now skipping the activation of systemd-
networkd-wait-online.service in case all Netplan interfaces are defined
to be "optional: true", using "ConditionPathIsSymbolicLink=" on
Netplan's s-n-wait-online.service enablement link, that's only set when
we have non-optional inter
Thanks for testing! There is a failure in your
systemd-networkd-wait-online.service logs:
> systemd-networkd-wait-online.service: Main process exited, code=exited,
> status=1/FAILURE
I fixed this failure in the ~ppa4 version. Could you confirm the failure
is gone with that newer version and stil
New attempt, that should be transparent to cloud-init, as we're just
creating a /run/systemd/systemd-networkd-wait-
online.service.d/10-netplan.conf override config, specifiying non-
optional interfaces as "/lib/systemd/systemd-networkd-wait-online -i
eth0 -i eth2 -i ..", but keeping the overall se
cloud-init seems to order After=sytemd-networkd-wait-online.service AND
Before=network-online.target. So the proposed solution is a no-go.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to systemd in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchp
Are you using NetworkManager in parallel here? Could you please provide
the output of `nmcli dev`? The applications you mention (App Store,
Settings/Online Accounts,...) seem to be Desktop centric and might rely
on NetworkManager functionality for the connectivity checker, which
systemd-networkd mi
** Also affects: systemd (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to systemd in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2060778
Title:
netplan, multiple dhcp route wi
** Also affects: systemd (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to systemd in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2055333
Title:
netplan.io 0.106.1-7ubuntu0.22.
Thanks for testing!
Heinrich confirmed offline, that the IPv4 address will come online
asynchronously, as expected for an "optional: true" definition.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to systemd in Ubuntu.
https:/
Can somebody please confirm that Netplan from this PPA fixes the
problem?
https://launchpad.net/~slyon/+archive/ubuntu/lp2060311/+packages
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to systemd in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchp
I started some work to help with this here:
https://github.com/canonical/netplan/pull/455
** Changed in: netplan
Status: New => In Progress
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to systemd in Ubuntu.
https://bug
** Changed in: netplan
Assignee: (unassigned) => Lukas Märdian (slyon)
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to systemd in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2060311
Title:
Setting "optional:
Here I produced some networkd debug logs on a UC22 system.
** Attachment added: "networkd-debug.log"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/netplan/+bug/2058976/+attachment/5762821/+files/networkd-debug.log
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, w
I think I can reporudce this on classic...
lxc launch --vm ubuntu-daily:jammy nd-reload
lxc shell nd-reload
root@nd-reload:~# netplan get
network:
version: 2
ethernets:
enp5s0:
dhcp4: true
root@nd-reload:~# networkctl
IDX LINK TYPE OPERATIONAL SETUP
1 lo loopback ca
Alfonso, do you have any debug-logs for sytemd-networkd and udev to see
what happens when the interface enters the "failed" state?
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to systemd in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/b
Also see bug #2036358
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to systemd in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2060311
Title:
Setting "optional: true" to overcome he timeout "Job systemd-networkd-
wait-online" d
** Tags removed: rls-nn-incoming
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to libvpx in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2058930
Title:
Missing in i386 Packages index
Status in libvpx package in Ubuntu:
Fix Rel
https://github.com/canonical/netplan/pull/447
** Changed in: netplan
Status: Triaged => Fix Committed
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to network-manager in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2055148
> alfonsosanchezbeato: to be clear, the networkctl reload/reconfigure commands
> seem to work, but after 6-8 minutes the state goes back to the one expressed
> by the old .network files
> alfonsosanchezbeato: you can even force the revert to happen sooner with sudo
> udevadm trigger, with that i
A fix was deployed (cowboyed) to the autopkgtest-cloud today.
** Changed in: libvpx (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Fix Committed
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to libvpx in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bug
Actually, this seems to be an issue of the source package not being
pulled from -proposed, as I can install the binaries just fine in a LXD
container:
root@nn:~# dpkg --add-architecture i386
root@nn:~# apt update
[...]
root@nn:~# apt install libvpx9:i386
Reading package lists... Done
Building depe
** Description changed:
- The new version of libvpx 1.14 seems to be missing in
- http://archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/dists/noble-
- proposed/main/binary-i386/Packages.xz, while it's still available in
- http://archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/dists/noble-
- proposed/main/binary-i386/Packages.gz.
-
- Grep
Public bug reported:
The new version of libvpx 1.14 seems not to be published to
http://ftpmaster.internal on i386 only.
This leads to the autopkgtest trigger "libvpx/1.14.0-1ubuntu1", not having any
effect on i386:
https://autopkgtest.ubuntu.com/packages/libvpx/noble/i386
** Affects: libvpx (U
** Tags added: fr-7190
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to network-manager in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2055148
Title:
NetworkManager connections with an explicit DoT (DNS over TLS) are not
suppo
Could you please provide journalctl debug logs from systemd-resolved, so
we can get more details of what's going on?
e.g. put this into the systemd-resolved override.conf
[Service]
Environment=SYSTEMD_LOG_LEVEL=debug
$ sudo systemctl edit systemd-resolved
$ sudo systemctl restart systemd-resolv
We should land a fix keeping the full string in
networkmanager.passthrough and additionaly work on a proper upstream
solution, as suggested by Danilo in comment #4, introducing new settings
as a longer term solution.
** Changed in: netplan
Status: New => Triaged
** Changed in: netplan
I
Thanks for the heads-up for Netplan! IIUC this will be fixed by a
systemd SRU, so closing it as "Invalid" for Netplan. Please re-open if
you feel there is something to do on our side.
** Changed in: netplan.io (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Invalid
--
You received this bug notification because y
This will be part of 1.0-1
** Changed in: netplan.io (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Fix Committed
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to network-manager in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2045096
Title:
Er
Public bug reported:
The intention of the previous avahi-autoipd integration was that on a
connection that does have dhcp configured, it will fall back to IPV4LL
if dhcp is unavailable.
This integration was recently dropped (and I think it never worked as intended
in the first place):
https://co
$ cat dummy.service
[Service]
ExecStart=tail -f /dev/null
[Install]
Alias=dumb.service
~$ sudo systemctl enable ~/dummy.service
Created symlink /etc/systemd/system/dumb.service →
/home/lukas/dummy.service.
Created symlink /etc/systemd/system/dummy.service →
/home/lukas/dummy.service.
~$ sudo systemctl
I confirmed the patch matches the upstream changes and builds find. I
see the bug description ([Test] section) was updated to mention pairing
of 7 audio and 2 non-audio devices. That pairing test needs to be re-run
with the final binaries, once they are build in the archive, as per the
usual SRU pr
This patch seems to resolve the situation locally.
For now I'll only go with the changes to tests/integration/base.py,
though. As that should be enough to avoid test failures, while the
service units shouldn't change (besides being re-generated 1:1).
I want to better understand what's going on ex
This is related:
https://github.com/canonical/netplan/commit/da6f776dd7e33050124fe2990b715db92c1ddee3
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to wpa in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2048388
Title:
Test suite
Public bug reported:
From: https://discourse.ubuntu.com/t/blog-netplan-developer-
diaries/35932/11
Hi all,
NetworkManager connections with an explicit DoT (DNS over TLS)
configuration are not supported with Netplan, but NetworkManager does
feed back the DoT DNS info with server address and Serve
** Changed in: netplan
Status: In Progress => Fix Committed
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to network-manager in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2045096
Title:
Error in network definition: Inval
https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ncurses/6.4+20240113-1ubuntu1
Unsubscribing ~ubuntu-sponsors
** Changed in: ncurses (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Fix Committed
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to ncurses in
** Changed in: netplan
Status: Triaged => In Progress
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to network-manager in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2045096
Title:
Error in network definition: Invalid MAC
Upstream fix landed in:
https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/NetworkManager/NetworkManager/-/commit/7f2a32fa11d580ee65a0458f438018de12b6ae84
** Summary changed:
- FTBFS when rebuilding 1.44 with GCC-14
+ FTBFS when rebuilding 1.44 with glib2-2.79.1
--
You received this bug notification because you ar
Fixed in https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/network-
manager/1.45.90-1ubuntu1
** Changed in: network-manager (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Fix Committed
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to network-manager in Ub
** Summary changed:
- FTBFS when rebuilding 1.44
+ FTBFS when rebuilding 1.44 with GCC-14
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to network-manager in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2052959
Title:
FTBFS when
Public bug reported:
FTBFS due to test failure after an unrelated autopkgtest change was
uploaded (https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/network-
manager/1.44.2-7ubuntu2).
ok 7 /config/warnings
PASS: src/core/tests/config/test-config 7 /config/warnings
# (src/core/tests/config/test-config.c:1107)
Looks like this has been fixed in upstream systemd, so there's probably
not a lot that we can do on the Netplan side.
** Changed in: netplan.io (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Invalid
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscrib
(In reply to Jacob Garby from comment #816)
> (In reply to Lukas from comment #814)
> > (In reply to Jacob Garby from comment #813)
> > > I have a "Lenovo Legion Slim 7i 16", and several days ago, out of
> nowhere,
> > > the speaker started working
(In reply to Jacob Garby from comment #813)
> I have a "Lenovo Legion Slim 7i 16", and several days ago, out of nowhere,
> the speaker started working. I have no idea how -- I did not change anything
> manually. I suspect it's a new kernel version that did it.
>
> I'm on Arch Linux, and I can't re
Please reopen if this is still an issue
** Changed in: netplan.io (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Invalid
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to systemd in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1768088
Title:
can
Hey, I have a Lenovo Yoga 7 16IAP7 with Fedora Workstation 39 installed.
Kernel Verion: Linux 6.6.11-200.fc39.x86_64
alsa-lib version: alsa-lib-1.2.10-3.fc39.x86_64
I installed alsa-tools and went into hdajackretask to see what is going
on. Then I noticed that my System is telling me that I have
Actually, we can further reduce the patch to the removal of
`.generate_mac = true`. This already fixes the issue we observe here.
** Patch added: "lp2037667.patch"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/2037667/+attachment/5741632/+files/lp2037667.patch
--
You received this bug
This seems to do the trick using the following Netplan config as a
testcase.
All 3 interfaces (tun[0-2]) are correctly created with their local &
remote properties set:
root@jj-abi:~/systemd# ip link show dev tun0
19: tun0@NONE: mtu 1448 qdisc noqueue state UNKNOWN mode
DEFAULT group default ql
So after bisecting systemd (v249..v251) on Jammy, this seems to be the
commit that changed behavior for the better:
https://github.com/systemd/systemd/commit/9f0cf80dd007491698978dbfe38158d74c1c9526
It probably needs some backporting for v249.11.
--
You received this bug notification because yo
** Changed in: systemd (Ubuntu Bionic)
Assignee: Lukas Märdian (slyon) => (unassigned)
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to systemd in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1949089
Title:
systemd rando
We talked to our systemd maintainer inside foundations and also reached
out to upstream system [1], which didn't lead anywhere. We shouldn't
need to bisect systemd-networkd and do a high impact systemd SRU to fix
a regression in a kernel update, where we can pinpoint the exact (small)
git commit.
IMO the wpasupplicant trigger is a red herring, as we see the same
failure on a trigger=system/255... test case:
https://autopkgtest.ubuntu.com/results/autopkgtest-
noble/noble/s390x/n/netplan.io/20240104_111341_511f7@/log.gz
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubun
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to wpa in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2048388
Title:
Test suite often fails with "systemd units changed without reload" on
s390x
Status in netplan:
Invalid
Status
Another option/idea I'd like to provide here is the migration script
used by NetworkManager [1], to transfer NM keyfiles from
/etc/NetworkManager/system-conncetions/ into /etc/netplan. This script
is automatically run on package upgrade of NetworkManager. I understand
this does not exactly fit the
https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/rsyslog/8.2312.0-2ubuntu1
** Changed in: rsyslog (Ubuntu)
Status: New => In Progress
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to rsyslog in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bu
Reducing to "Medium", as I don't think we can hit this situation through
the Netplan-everywhere integration, but manual steps (wrong YAML config)
must be involved in reaching this state.
We're working on a fix here:
https://github.com/canonical/netplan/pull/427
** Changed in: netplan
Importanc
@vanillaoerba How did you end up in that situation? Did you modify
/etc/netplan/90-NM-X.yaml manually?
Those special values for the MAC address should have been handled by the
networkmanager.passthrough.cloned-mac-address=random setting for you..
--
You received this bug notification because
** Changed in: netplan.io (Ubuntu)
Status: Confirmed => Fix Committed
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to network-manager in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2046158
Title:
Updating wireguard-peer.
The RequiredForOnline=no flag can be controlled using Netplan's "optional:
true" setting.
In your specific case (cable not connected) you might also be interested in
Netplan's "ignore-carrier: true" setting, which brings up the interface
regardless.
Please check /etc/netplan/ for those settings
** Also affects: netplan.io (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
** Tags added: fr-6121
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to network-manager in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2045096
Title
** Tags added: netplan-everywhere
** Changed in: netplan
Status: New => Triaged
** Changed in: netplan
Importance: Undecided => High
** Tags added: foundations-todo
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to
Fixed in v0.107 https://github.com/canonical/netplan/releases/tag/0.107
** Changed in: netplan
Status: Fix Committed => Fix Released
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to network-manager in Ubuntu.
https://bu
So if I understand correctly, this does not affect Focal or Bionic.
It also does not affect Mantic or Noble.
We're just hitting this issue on Jammy = systemd v249.11 (and probably
Lunar = systemd v252.5).
Netplan's behavior seems to be correct, here. It writes sensible
configuration for systemd-n
This should have been fixed upstream as of
https://github.com/canonical/netplan/pull/371 and should be fixed in
Mantic.
Can you still re-produce this issue today?
** Changed in: netplan.io (Ubuntu)
Status: In Progress => Fix Released
--
You received this bug notification because you are
Netplan is not involved with setting the hostname at all. Marking
invalid for that package.
** Changed in: netplan.io (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Invalid
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to systemd in Ubuntu.
h
** Changed in: netplan.io (Ubuntu)
Status: Triaged => Invalid
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to network-manager in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2040153
Title:
Network Manager will not remove
** Tags removed: rls-nn-incoming
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to network-manager in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2041491
Title:
Provide an option to avoid the yaml NM backend
Status in netplan.io
Thank you for your thoughtful report!
This change was not just made to be useful in cloud environments, but
also is about unification of network configuration across the different
variants of Ubuntu (Desktop/Server/Core/Cloud/..), to improve the UX for
Ubuntu users. I understand this impacts the c
** Also affects: netplan.io (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
** Tags added: netplan-everywhere
** Tags added: rls-nn-incoming
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to network-manager in Ubuntu.
htt
** Tags removed: foundations-todo
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to network-manager in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2040153
Title:
Network Manager will not remove Netplan YAMLs when connections are
** Changed in: network-manager (Ubuntu Noble)
Status: Confirmed => In Progress
** Changed in: network-manager (Ubuntu Noble)
Assignee: (unassigned) => Lukas Märdian (slyon)
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, wh
Thank you for your investigation. This sounds very related to this
systemd/udev quirk:
https://github.com/canonical/netplan/commit/1413f0e7b8f4d068f817a009d998656de3224370
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to netwo
** Tags removed: block-proposed-mantic
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to network-manager in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2040292
Title:
network-manager SRU flags system for restart required but also
1 - 100 of 624 matches
Mail list logo