[Touch-packages] [Bug 1895757] Re: Terminal hangs running sudo when "use_pty" is set in /etc/sudoers

2020-10-20 Thread Mauricio Faria de Oliveira
Hi SRU team, All autopkgtest failures in #4 are now passing on all architectures. - gvfs/amd64 was flaky, passed on retry. - openssh/* needs the test-case fix staged in bionic-proposed; passed by adding openssh/1:7.6p1-4ubuntu0.4 to the triggers. (Thanks @halves for spotting a

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1895757] Re: Terminal hangs running sudo when "use_pty" is set in /etc/sudoers

2020-10-08 Thread Mauricio Faria de Oliveira
Looked at the autopkgtest regressions: gvfs2 passed on retry. openssh fails with -updates and -release too. openssh is missing the test-case fix currently in -proposed (openssh/1:7.6p1-4ubuntu0.4) to confirm, i ran openssh autopkgtests w/ openssh from -proposed; it passes. however, when trying

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1879980] Re: Fail to boot with LUKS on top of RAID1 if the array is broken/degraded

2020-10-05 Thread Mauricio Faria de Oliveira
Hey Alex, thank you very much for your prompt review. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to initramfs-tools in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1879980 Title: Fail to boot with LUKS on top of RAID1 if the

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1879980] Re: Fail to boot with LUKS on top of RAID1 if the array is broken/degraded

2020-09-30 Thread Mauricio Faria de Oliveira
Hi Ubuntu Security Team, I've subscribed you to this bug for a patch review asked by the SRU team. Please find a request summary below, and feel free to ask for details. There's a change being proposed to the cryptsetup boot logic (debdiff in comment #44) so to allow an encrypted device on top

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1820929] Re: netplan should consider adding more udev attribute for exact matching of failover 3-netdev interfaces

2020-09-29 Thread Mauricio Faria de Oliveira
This has been verified successfully on Bionic by @jvosburgh on a (complex) internal test setup for 3-netdev naming work. ** Tags removed: verification-needed-bionic ** Tags added: verification-done-bionic -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1879980] Re: Fail to boot with LUKS on top of RAID1 if the array is broken/degraded

2020-09-25 Thread Mauricio Faria de Oliveira
1) There are no changes with the cryptsetup in bionic-updates. This is expected, because the changes in initramfs-tools are gated by a file introduced in the patched cryptsetup. Thus no regression from the initramfs-tools side. ... And, additional testing with the _patched_ cryptsetup, just in

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1879980] Re: Fail to boot with LUKS on top of RAID1 if the array is broken/degraded

2020-09-25 Thread Mauricio Faria de Oliveira
** Attachment added: "lp1879980 verification-bionic.log" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/cryptsetup/+bug/1879980/+attachment/5414278/+files/lp1879980%20verification-bionic.log -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1879980] Re: Fail to boot with LUKS on top of RAID1 if the array is broken/degraded

2020-09-25 Thread Mauricio Faria de Oliveira
In the benefit of the initramfs-tools upload to move on: I have verified that it has no regressions with current cryptsetup in bionic-updates and works as expected with the patched version (in upload queue, not -proposed yet.) Verification details in the next comment and detailed topology and

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1879980] Re: Fail to boot with LUKS on top of RAID1 if the array is broken/degraded

2020-09-24 Thread Mauricio Faria de Oliveira
Hi Łukasz, Thanks for accepting initramfs-tools for now; it's much appreciated. I'm not sure the security team reviewed this; but I can't confirm. I'll try to find a reviewer there, to check the concerns you have. Could you please confirm/correct/add the concerns/review points? 1) Behavior

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1879987] Re: machine get stuck at boot if specified 'console=ttyS* ' doesn't exist.

2020-09-24 Thread Mauricio Faria de Oliveira
Verification done for xenial: xenial-updates: - boots fine w/ console=ttyS0, can ssh in 10 seconds. - boot fails w/ console=ttyS1, cannot SSH, qemu on 100% CPU (initramfs-tools looping) xenial-proposed: - boots fine w/ console=ttyS0, can ssh in 10 seconds. (no regression) - boots fine w/

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1879987] Re: machine get stuck at boot if specified 'console=ttyS* ' doesn't exist.

2020-09-24 Thread Mauricio Faria de Oliveira
Verification done for bionic: bionic-updates: - boots fine w/ console=ttyS0, can ssh in 10 seconds. - boot fails w/ console=ttyS1, cannot SSH, qemu on 100% CPU (initramfs-tools looping) bionic-proposed: - boots fine w/ console=ttyS0, can ssh in 10 seconds. (no regression) - boots fine w/

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1879987] Re: machine get stuck at boot if specified 'console=ttyS* ' doesn't exist.

2020-09-23 Thread Mauricio Faria de Oliveira
Uploaded initramfs-tools to Bionic. Attaching the updated debdiff for reference. (Rebased on top of the more recent -updates.) ** Patch added: "bionic_initramfs-tools_lp1879980_V3.debdiff"

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1879987] Re: machine get stuck at boot if specified 'console=ttyS* ' doesn't exist.

2020-09-23 Thread Mauricio Faria de Oliveira
Uploaded initramfs-tools to Bionic and Xenial. Attaching the updated debdiff for reference. (Rebased on top of the more recent -updates.) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to initramfs-tools in Ubuntu.

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1879987] Re: machine get stuck at boot if specified 'console=ttyS* ' doesn't exist.

2020-09-23 Thread Mauricio Faria de Oliveira
** Patch added: "bionic_initramfs-tools_lp1879980_V3.debdiff" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/initramfs-tools/+bug/1879987/+attachment/5413639/+files/bionic_initramfs-tools_lp1879980_V3.debdiff -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1820929] Re: netplan should consider adding more udev attribute for exact matching of failover 3-netdev interfaces

2020-09-23 Thread Mauricio Faria de Oliveira
Uploaded initramfs-tools to Bionic. Attaching the updated debdiff for reference. (Rebased on top of the more recent -updates.) ** Tags added: sts-sponsor-mfo ** Patch added: "bionic_initramfs-tools_lp1879980_V3.debdiff"

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1879980] Re: Fail to boot with LUKS on top of RAID1 if the array is broken/degraded

2020-09-23 Thread Mauricio Faria de Oliveira
** Patch added: "bionic_initramfs-tools_lp1879980_V3.debdiff" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/cryptsetup/+bug/1879980/+attachment/5413638/+files/bionic_initramfs-tools_lp1879980_V3.debdiff -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1879980] Re: Fail to boot with LUKS on top of RAID1 if the array is broken/degraded

2020-09-23 Thread Mauricio Faria de Oliveira
Uploaded initramfs-tools to Bionic. Attaching the updated debdiff for reference. (Rebased on top of the more recent -updates.) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to initramfs-tools in Ubuntu.

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1879987] Re: machine get stuck at boot if specified 'console=ttyS* ' doesn't exist.

2020-09-23 Thread Mauricio Faria de Oliveira
** Tags added: sts-sponsor-mfo -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to initramfs-tools in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1879987 Title: machine get stuck at boot if specified 'console=ttyS* ' doesn't

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1879980] Re: Fail to boot with LUKS on top of RAID1 if the array is broken/degraded

2020-09-23 Thread Mauricio Faria de Oliveira
** Patch added: "bionic_cryptsetup_lp1879980_V3.debdiff" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/cryptsetup/+bug/1879980/+attachment/5413627/+files/bionic_cryptsetup_lp1879980_V3.debdiff -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1879980] Re: Fail to boot with LUKS on top of RAID1 if the array is broken/degraded

2020-09-23 Thread Mauricio Faria de Oliveira
** Patch added: "focal_cryptsetup_lp1879980_V3.debdiff" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/cryptsetup/+bug/1879980/+attachment/5413626/+files/focal_cryptsetup_lp1879980_V3.debdiff -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1879980] Re: Fail to boot with LUKS on top of RAID1 if the array is broken/degraded

2020-09-23 Thread Mauricio Faria de Oliveira
Uploaded cryptsetup to Focal and Bionic. Attaching the updated debdiffs for reference. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to initramfs-tools in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1879980 Title: Fail to boot

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1879980] Re: Fail to boot with LUKS on top of RAID1 if the array is broken/degraded

2020-09-22 Thread Mauricio Faria de Oliveira
** Tags added: sts-sponsor-mfo -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to initramfs-tools in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1879980 Title: Fail to boot with LUKS on top of RAID1 if the array is

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1862846] Re: Crash and failure installing focal

2020-09-22 Thread Mauricio Faria de Oliveira
** Tags removed: sts-sponsor-mfo -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to util-linux in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1862846 Title: Crash and failure installing focal Status in subiquity: Fix Released

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1865504] Re: hwclock reports incorrect status in audit message

2020-09-22 Thread Mauricio Faria de Oliveira
** Tags removed: sts-sponsor-mfo -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to util-linux in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1865504 Title: hwclock reports incorrect status in audit message Status in util-linux

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1858802] Re: libblkid: no bcache UUID due to ambivalent detection of bcache and xfs_external_log for regular xfs in bcache backing device

2020-09-22 Thread Mauricio Faria de Oliveira
** Tags removed: sts-sponsor-mfo -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to util-linux in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1858802 Title: libblkid: no bcache UUID due to ambivalent detection of bcache and

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1870316] Re: 'sudo hwclock -s' fails with 'settimeofday() failed: Invalid argument'

2020-09-22 Thread Mauricio Faria de Oliveira
** Tags removed: sts-sponsor-mfo -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to util-linux in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1870316 Title: 'sudo hwclock -s' fails with 'settimeofday() failed: Invalid argument'

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1886300] Re: rename.ul refuses to rename links that don't resolve (regression)

2020-09-22 Thread Mauricio Faria de Oliveira
** Tags removed: sts-sponsor-mfo -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to util-linux in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1886300 Title: rename.ul refuses to rename links that don't resolve (regression)

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1879980] Re: Fail to boot with LUKS on top of RAID1 if the array is broken/degraded

2020-09-22 Thread Mauricio Faria de Oliveira
** Patch added: "groovy_cryptsetup_lp1879980_V3.debdiff" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/cryptsetup/+bug/1879980/+attachment/5413208/+files/groovy_cryptsetup_lp1879980_V3.debdiff -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1879980] Re: Fail to boot with LUKS on top of RAID1 if the array is broken/degraded

2020-09-22 Thread Mauricio Faria de Oliveira
Hi Eric, I just updated the changelog with a more detailed description per file. If it looks good to you for Groovy I'll update the stable releases too. Thanks! Mauricio -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1879980] Re: Fail to boot with LUKS on top of RAID1 if the array is broken/degraded

2020-09-22 Thread Mauricio Faria de Oliveira
Hi Guilherme, I can handle that while you're out. cheers, Mauricio -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to initramfs-tools in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1879980 Title: Fail to boot with LUKS on top

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1886300] Re: rename.ul refuses to rename links that don't resolve (regression)

2020-08-28 Thread Mauricio Faria de Oliveira
Thanks for verifying focal-proposed (and adding the tag.) Oh, I forgot to mark Groovy as Fix Released on comment #15; doing it now. ** Changed in: util-linux (Ubuntu Groovy) Status: Fix Committed => Triaged ** Changed in: util-linux (Ubuntu Groovy) Status: Triaged => Fix Released

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1886300] Re: rename.ul refuses to rename links that don't resolve (regression)

2020-08-27 Thread Mauricio Faria de Oliveira
Autopkgstests failures: - gfs2-utils/ppc64el: unrelated; I'll take a look (it held groovy's proposed migration weeks ago.) - systemd: likely unrelated, see bug 1892358 (success rate dropped) - tracker: flaky; now passing. - kopanocore: flaky; now passing. -- You received this bug notification

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1886300] Re: rename.ul refuses to rename links that don't resolve (regression)

2020-08-20 Thread Mauricio Faria de Oliveira
Groovy now has the fix released in util-linux 2.36-2ubuntu1. Focal can now move on. I've changed the debdiff slightly on the DEP3 headers and version number, small nitpicks. The package builds fine on all architectures in a PPA, and testing is successful: focal-release / fail: $ dpkg -s

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1886300] Re: rename.ul refuses to rename links that don't resolve (regression)

2020-08-20 Thread Mauricio Faria de Oliveira
Uploaded to Focal. Seyeong, could you please update the Test Case section of the SRU template to reflect the usage of Ubuntu commands and not upstream/built commands? Thanks, Mauricio -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1888926] Re: tls.tlscfgcmd not recognized; rebuild rsyslog against librelp 1.5.0

2020-08-20 Thread Mauricio Faria de Oliveira
This should be fixed with rsyslog 8.2001.0-1ubuntu1.1 in focal-updates. ** Changed in: rsyslog (Ubuntu Focal) Status: Fix Committed => Fix Released -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to rsyslog in Ubuntu.

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1886300] Re: rename.ul refuses to rename links that don't resolve (regression)

2020-08-07 Thread Mauricio Faria de Oliveira
Hi Seyeong, The proposed-migration of util-linux in groovy is blocked on one last autopkgtest of gfs2-utils failing on ppc64el (the 'mount' test times out; reproducible even w/ previous versions) [1, 2] This is new and unrelated to these changes (not uploaded to groovy), but prevents uploading

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1888926] Re: tls.tlscfgcmd not recognized; rebuild rsyslog against librelp 1.5.0

2020-08-07 Thread Mauricio Faria de Oliveira
Er, actually s/Invalid/Fix Committed/, so to document that this bug (behavior of input parameter 'tls.tlscfgcmd' not supported) will be fixed/gets fixed on rsyslog 8.2001.0-1ubuntu1.1 (in focal-proposed.) ** Changed in: rsyslog (Ubuntu Focal) Status: In Progress => Fix Committed ** Tags

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1888926] Re: tls.tlscfgcmd not recognized; rebuild rsyslog against librelp 1.5.0

2020-08-07 Thread Mauricio Faria de Oliveira
In an interesting overnight timing event, that rsyslog upload has been accepted to focal-proposed. Sure enough, it built with librelp-dev_1.5.0-1ubuntu2. And the configure stage enables the option: checking for relpSrvSetTlsConfigCmd... yes checking for relpSrvSetTlsConfigCmd... (cached) yes

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1888926] Re: tls.tlscfgcmd not recognized; rebuild rsyslog against librelp 1.5.0

2020-08-06 Thread Mauricio Faria de Oliveira
Verification/comparison steps to ensure that the modified rsyslog package is built and working correctly, given its importance in the distribution: 1) Compare test suite results in build logs 2) Compare configuration options in build logs 3) Compare packages' control file and contents All look

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1888926] Re: tls.tlscfgcmd not recognized; rebuild rsyslog against librelp 1.5.0

2020-08-06 Thread Mauricio Faria de Oliveira
Hi Jorge, Thanks for tracking this down in the build history. > I suspect that the rsyslog package was built against and older librelp version. You're right, the build log shows 'librelp-dev_1.4.0-2' in the package installs/'Build environment' section. I slightly modified the changelog entry,

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1888926] Re: tls.tlscfgcmd not recognized; rebuild rsyslog against librelp 1.5.0

2020-08-06 Thread Mauricio Faria de Oliveira
** Patch added: "lp1888926-focal-v2.debdiff" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/rsyslog/+bug/1888926/+attachment/5399433/+files/lp1888926-focal-v2.debdiff -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to rsyslog in

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1886300] Re: rename.ul refuses to rename links that don't resolve (regression)

2020-08-05 Thread Mauricio Faria de Oliveira
** Changed in: util-linux (Ubuntu Groovy) Status: Confirmed => Fix Committed ** Changed in: util-linux (Ubuntu Focal) Status: Confirmed => In Progress -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to util-linux

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1886300] Re: rename.ul refuses to rename links that don't resolve (regression)

2020-08-04 Thread Mauricio Faria de Oliveira
Hi Seyeong, Thanks for the updated debdiffs and reporting Debian bug 966106 (Please feel free to comment in the LP bug when you report a Debian bug.) Per the Debian maintainer, they recently stopped shipping/installing rename.ul, on 2.35.2-5. Fortunately this only affects Groovy and later (non

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1888926] Re: tls.tlscfgcmd not recognized; rebuild rsyslog against librelp 1.5.0

2020-08-04 Thread Mauricio Faria de Oliveira
** Tags added: sts-sponsor-mfo -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to rsyslog in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1888926 Title: tls.tlscfgcmd not recognized; rebuild rsyslog against librelp 1.5.0 Status

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1889297] Re: Bionic: debian-installer FTBFS because udev-udeb depends on libkmod2 not libkmod2-udeb

2020-07-30 Thread Mauricio Faria de Oliveira
The systemd upload has been accepted into bionic-proposed, and udev-udeb depends on likmod2-udeb. All good. Package: udev-udeb Source: systemd Version: 237-3ubuntu10.42 ... Depends: libblkid1-udeb (>= 2.31), libc6-udeb (>= 2.27), libkmod2-udeb, util-linux-udeb The existing d-i upload to

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1889297] Re: Bionic: debian-installer FTBFS because udev-udeb depends on libkmod2 not libkmod2-udeb

2020-07-30 Thread Mauricio Faria de Oliveira
That cleared up the autopkgtest regression. systemd [bionic/i386] Version TriggersDateDurationRequester Result 237-3ubuntu10.41kmod/24-1ubuntu3.5 2020-07-29 23:55:56 UTC 1h 03m 06s mfo pass ... -- You received this bug

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1889297] Re: Bionic: debian-installer FTBFS because udev-udeb depends on libkmod2 not libkmod2-udeb

2020-07-29 Thread Mauricio Faria de Oliveira
The failing autopkgtest is in the 'upstream' tests (search for 'TEST RUN: Job-related tests' twice.) It's very probably unrelated: apparently the testsuite.service ended unexpectedly, due to a SIGCHLD because the sleep.service (the child iiuic) got a SIGTERM unexpectedly too, and finished.

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1889297] Re: Bionic: debian-installer FTBFS because udev-udeb depends on libkmod2 not libkmod2-udeb

2020-07-29 Thread Mauricio Faria de Oliveira
Verification done on bionic-proposed. The shlibs file of libkmod2 contains the udeb line: $ pull-lp-debs libkmod2 bionic $ dpkg-deb --control libkmod2_24-1ubuntu3.5_amd64.deb dir $ cat dir/shlibs libkmod 2 libkmod2 udeb: libkmod 2 libkmod2-udeb Then building systemd in a

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1889297] Re: Bionic: debian-installer FTBFS because udev-udeb depends on libkmod2 not libkmod2-udeb

2020-07-29 Thread Mauricio Faria de Oliveira
Finally, with the kmod change, plus the systemd rebuild, now d-i builds successfully on all archs in the PPA [1]. [1] https://launchpad.net/~mfo/+archive/ubuntu/lp1889297/ -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to kmod

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1889297] Re: Bionic: debian-installer FTBFS because udev-udeb depends on libkmod2 not libkmod2-udeb

2020-07-28 Thread Mauricio Faria de Oliveira
Apparenlty the systemd package in the upload queue will be reviewed. For my test packages, @ddstreet told me that a pure no-change rebuild of systemd would FTBFS on arm64 due to bug #1886197. So I added that patch to this systemd "almost no-change rebuild" patch. ** Patch removed:

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1889297] Re: Bionic: debian-installer FTBFS because udev-udeb depends on libkmod2 not libkmod2-udeb

2020-07-28 Thread Mauricio Faria de Oliveira
With the test packages for kmod and systemd in this PPA [1] I can confirm that udev-udeb now Depends: on libkmod2-udeb. >From the build log: Package: udev-udeb ... Depends: libblkid1-udeb (>= 2.31), libc6-udeb (>= 2.27), libkmod2-udeb, util-linux-udeb Just uploaded kmod to Bionic. [1]

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1889297] Re: Bionic: debian-installer FTBFS because udev-udeb depends on libkmod2 not libkmod2-udeb

2020-07-28 Thread Mauricio Faria de Oliveira
> High ** Changed in: systemd (Ubuntu Bionic) Assignee: (unassigned) => Mauricio Faria de Oliveira (mfo) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to kmod in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1889297 Title: Bi

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1889297] Re: Bionic: debian-installer FTBFS because udev-udeb depends on libkmod2 not libkmod2-udeb

2020-07-28 Thread Mauricio Faria de Oliveira
Currently building the packages on PPA to verify all three parts (kmod, systemd, d-i) work correctly with the changes. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to kmod in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1889297

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1889297] Re: Bionic: debian-installer FTBFS because udev-udeb depends on libkmod2 not libkmod2-udeb

2020-07-28 Thread Mauricio Faria de Oliveira
** Patch added: "lp1889297_bionic_kmod.debdiff" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/kmod/+bug/1889297/+attachment/5396663/+files/lp1889297_bionic_kmod.debdiff -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to kmod in

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1889297] Re: Bionic: debian-installer FTBFS because udev-udeb depends on libkmod2 not libkmod2-udeb

2020-07-28 Thread Mauricio Faria de Oliveira
There's a systemd upload for Bionic with this version number already. I guess that is a larger change that may be intended for post-release, while this change is needed for release, so d-i builds w/ new kernels. So, keeping the same number for now, in case this needs to trump that. ** Patch

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1889297] [NEW] Bionic: debian-installer FTBFS because udev-udeb depends on libkmod2 not libkmod2-udeb

2020-07-28 Thread Mauricio Faria de Oliveira
uild on systemd, after kmod is built/available in archive. ** Affects: kmod (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: Invalid ** Affects: kmod (Ubuntu Bionic) Importance: High Assignee: Mauricio Faria de Oliveira (mfo) Status: In Progress ** Also affects: kmod (Ubu

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1886300] Re: rename.ul refuses to rename links that don't resolve (regression)

2020-07-21 Thread Mauricio Faria de Oliveira
Hi Seyeong, Thanks for the debdiffs! They look good in general but need a few fixes: 1) groovy-proposed has util-linux 2.35.2-9ubuntu1 (debdiff used groovy- updates / 2.35.2-7ubuntu3) 2) the DEP3 headers should be before a triple-dash "---" line per [1]. I'd suggest moving it to

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1886300] Re: rename.ul refuses to rename links that don't resolve (regression)

2020-07-20 Thread Mauricio Faria de Oliveira
know if you'd like pointers about the procedure to report bugs to the Debian Bug Tracking System (BTS). cheers, Mauricio ** Changed in: util-linux (Ubuntu Groovy) Status: In Progress => Confirmed ** Changed in: util-linux (Ubuntu Groovy) Assignee: Mauricio Faria de Oliveira (

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1883441] Re: Fatal interaction between sfdisk and lsblk

2020-07-15 Thread Mauricio Faria de Oliveira
No worries! Thanks for getting back to this bug report. Marking it as Invalid. ** Changed in: util-linux (Ubuntu) Status: Incomplete => Invalid -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to util-linux in Ubuntu.

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1886300] Re: rename.ul refuses to rename links that don't resolve (regression)

2020-07-08 Thread Mauricio Faria de Oliveira
Patch applied upstream [1]. Next steps are to apply it downstream in Debian and Ubuntu. [1] https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/utils/util-linux/util- linux.git/commit/?id=477239ce0d60384642b51c950688136fdefec815 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1886300] Re: rename.ul refuses to rename links that don't resolve (regression)

2020-07-08 Thread Mauricio Faria de Oliveira
| 2.35.2-5ubuntu3 | groovy | source ** Also affects: util-linux (Ubuntu Groovy) Importance: Medium Assignee: Mauricio Faria de Oliveira (mfo) Status: In Progress ** Also affects: util-linux (Ubuntu Eoan) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Also affects: util

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1886300] Re: rename.ul refuses to rename links that don't resolve (regression)

2020-07-07 Thread Mauricio Faria de Oliveira
nux (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided => Medium ** Changed in: util-linux (Ubuntu) Assignee: (unassigned) => Mauricio Faria de Oliveira (mfo) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to util-linux in Ubun

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1883441] Re: Fatal interaction between sfdisk and lsblk

2020-06-15 Thread Mauricio Faria de Oliveira
Hi Kevin, I could not reproduce this on a Bionic VM with a loop device w/ two NTFS partitions (type + filesystem). Could you please provide a strace log of both default/-s cases from your environment? # strace -ffttTy -o strace.log b5.sh # tar cvf lp1883441-strace.tar strace.log.* ** Changed

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1873489] Re: lscpu cache information is incorrect with focal on arm 64-bit platform (ThunderX2)

2020-04-29 Thread Mauricio Faria de Oliveira
Hi Taihsiang, Thanks for reporting this bug. This is an upstream deliberate change in output format of caches in lscpu. They introduced the '--caches' option to provide individual/total sizes. It affects other architectures as well, not just arm64; e.g., amd64. For example, on my laptop:

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1870316] Re: 'sudo hwclock -s' fails with 'settimeofday() failed: Invalid argument'

2020-04-08 Thread Mauricio Faria de Oliveira
The only autopkgtest 'regression' is openjdk-8/8u252-b07-1/armhf, which is a flaky test. Triggering a re-run. Error in test logs: > jdk FLAKY timed out -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1870553] [NEW] OopsText.txt does not contain stack trace

2020-04-03 Thread Mauricio Faria de Oliveira
Public bug reported: Please refer to bug 1868388 attachment OopsText.txt. The issue reported is a kernel cpu soft lockup. The stack trace is essential to understand what was going on, but it's _not included at_ all - actually, it's been cut off, there's the beginning of the kernel messages, but

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1870316] Re: 'sudo hwclock -s' fails with 'settimeofday() failed: Invalid argument'

2020-04-02 Thread Mauricio Faria de Oliveira
The patched package built correctly on all architectures on PPA [1]. And now 'hwclock -s' works again. $ dpkg -s util-linux libc6 | grep ^Version: Version: 2.34-0.1ubuntu9 Version: 2.31-0ubuntu6 $ sudo hwclock -s $ echo $? 0 Attaching debdiff, and asking for sponsorship. [1]

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1870316] Re: 'sudo hwclock -s' fails with 'settimeofday() failed: Invalid argument'

2020-04-02 Thread Mauricio Faria de Oliveira
** Patch added: "lp1870316_focal_util-linux.debdiff" https://bugs.launchpad.net/debian/+source/util-linux/+bug/1870316/+attachment/5345060/+files/lp1870316_focal_util-linux.debdiff ** Changed in: util-linux (Ubuntu) Status: Confirmed => In Progress -- You received this bug

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1870316] Re: 'sudo hwclock -s' fails with 'settimeofday() failed: Invalid argument'

2020-04-02 Thread Mauricio Faria de Oliveira
** Bug watch added: Debian Bug tracker #99 https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=99 ** Also affects: util-linux (Debian) via https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=99 Importance: Unknown Status: Unknown -- You received this bug notification

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1870316] Re: 'sudo hwclock -s' fails with 'settimeofday() failed: Invalid argument'

2020-04-02 Thread Mauricio Faria de Oliveira
x (Ubuntu) Assignee: (unassigned) => Mauricio Faria de Oliveira (mfo) ** Tags added: sts-sponsor-mfo -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to util-linux in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1870316 Title: '

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1865504] Re: hwclock reports incorrect status in audit message

2020-03-17 Thread Mauricio Faria de Oliveira
autopkgtests --- All test failures (except mysql-5.7 on bionic) were transient, and passed w/ one retry. The test failure for mysql-5.7/bionic is unrelated to this upload. Confirmed w/ a retry on -updates and -proposed. Both fail in the same way: mysql-5.7 [bionic/amd64] Version

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1865504] Re: hwclock reports incorrect status in audit message

2020-03-17 Thread Mauricio Faria de Oliveira
Hi Joy, Thanks for looking at those, I'm back from PTO and will take a look at clearing them out. Do you plan to verify bionic/eoan-proposed? I can do it as it's quick, but wanted to check w/ you first as you're the reporter. Thanks, Mauricio -- You received this bug notification because you

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1865504] Re: hwclock reports incorrect status in audit message

2020-03-11 Thread Mauricio Faria de Oliveira
** Tags added: sts-sponsor-mfo -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to util-linux in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1865504 Title: hwclock reports incorrect status in audit message Status in util-linux

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1865504] Re: hwclock reports incorrect status in audit message

2020-03-11 Thread Mauricio Faria de Oliveira
** Patch added: "lp1865504_eoan_util-linux.debdiff" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/util-linux/+bug/1865504/+attachment/5335833/+files/lp1865504_eoan_util-linux.debdiff -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1865504] Re: hwclock reports incorrect status in audit message

2020-03-11 Thread Mauricio Faria de Oliveira
Test/Bionic: === $ lsb_release -cs bionic Before: (audit.log has res=failed) --- $ dpkg -s util-linux | grep ^Version: Version: 2.31.1-0.4ubuntu3.5 $ sudo hwclock --set --date "1/1/2000 00:00:00" $ echo $? 0 $ sudo hwclock --utc --systohc $ echo $? 0 $ grep hwclock /var/log/audit/audit.log |

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1865504] Re: hwclock reports incorrect status in audit message

2020-03-11 Thread Mauricio Faria de Oliveira
Joy, Great work on the debdiff, specially on the DEP3 headers in the patch, and on the steps to reproduce, which are concise and clear. I slightly modified the changelog entry to include the d/p/file.patch path, and clarified its purpose. I also ran 'quilt refresh' to remove offsets when

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1865504] Re: hwclock reports incorrect status in audit message

2020-03-11 Thread Mauricio Faria de Oliveira
** Patch added: "lp1865504_bionic_util-linux.debdiff" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/util-linux/+bug/1865504/+attachment/5335834/+files/lp1865504_bionic_util-linux.debdiff -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1865504] Re: hwclock reports incorrect status in audit message

2020-03-11 Thread Mauricio Faria de Oliveira
Test/Eoan: === $ lsb_release -cs eoan $ sudo apt update $ sudo apt install -y auditd Before: (audit.log has res=failed) --- $ dpkg -s util-linux | grep ^Version: Version: 2.34-0.1ubuntu2.3 $ sudo hwclock --set --date "1/1/2000 00:00:00" $ echo $? 0 $ sudo hwclock --utc --systohc $ echo $? 0

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1865504] Re: hwclock reports incorrect status in audit message

2020-03-11 Thread Mauricio Faria de Oliveira
** Description changed: - [IMPACT] - hwclock reports incrorect status in audit message + [Impact] - hwclock calls audit_log_user_message(3) to create an audit entry. - audit_log_user_message(3) result 1 is "success" and 0 is - "failed", hwclock use standard EXIT_{SUCCESS,FAILURE} macros with

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1865504] Re: hwclock reports incorrect status in audit message

2020-03-11 Thread Mauricio Faria de Oliveira
Working on the stable releases E/B as discussed w/ Marc on IRC. ** Changed in: util-linux (Ubuntu Bionic) Status: New => In Progress ** Changed in: util-linux (Ubuntu Bionic) Assignee: (unassigned) => Mauricio Faria de Oliveira (mfo) ** Changed in: util-linux (Ubuntu

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1865504] Re: hwclock reports incorrect status in audit message

2020-03-05 Thread Mauricio Faria de Oliveira
Hi Joy, Marc, Nice catch on this bug. I see the debdiff made focal-proposed just now; cool I'd be happy to review/sponsor for Eoan and Bionic, if you're OK with it. I currently have an SRU in eoan-proposed, which should be promoted next week, so I'm already keeping an eye out for when it's

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1863189] Re: package libuuid1:amd64 2.34-0.1ubuntu2.2 failed to install/upgrade: O pacote está num mau estado de inconsistência; deve reinstala-lo antes de tentar configura-lo.

2020-03-03 Thread Mauricio Faria de Oliveira
Setting the bug as Invalid; temporary issue on mirrors as initially suspected. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to util-linux in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1863189 Title: package libuuid1:amd64

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1863189] Re: package libuuid1:amd64 2.34-0.1ubuntu2.2 failed to install/upgrade: O pacote está num mau estado de inconsistência; deve reinstala-lo antes de tentar configura-lo.

2020-03-03 Thread Mauricio Faria de Oliveira
Obrigado por confirmar. ** Changed in: util-linux (Ubuntu) Status: Incomplete => Invalid -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to util-linux in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1863189 Title: package

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1865435] Re: package uuid-runtime 2.34-0.1ubuntu2.2 failed to install/upgrade: installed uuid-runtime package post-installation script subprocess returned error exit status 1

2020-03-02 Thread Mauricio Faria de Oliveira
Hi Nagendra, Please provide the output of this command: $ systemctl status -- -.mount Did you happen to run 'sudo systemctl mask' on the -.mount unit ? The problem in package install/update is caused because that unit is masked, but it's not on my Eoan system. So currently wondering if that

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1862846] Re: Crash and failure installing focal

2020-03-02 Thread Mauricio Faria de Oliveira
Hi Lukasz, thanks! Sure thing, I'll add it. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to util-linux in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1862846 Title: Crash and failure installing focal Status in subiquity:

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1862846] Re: Crash and failure installing focal

2020-03-02 Thread Mauricio Faria de Oliveira
$ lsb_release -cs eoan Test device: partition (sdb1) in removable / USB flash disk (sdb) $ ls -1d /sys/block/sdb/sdb1 /sys/block/sdb/sdb1 $ cat /sys/block/sdb/removable 1 eoan-proposed: --- - PKNAME shows partition's parent/wholedisk. - RM shows 1 for removable disk's partition. $ dpkg -s

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1862846] Re: Crash and failure installing focal

2020-02-20 Thread Mauricio Faria de Oliveira
@slashd, thanks for uploading util-linux to Focal. I've added the SRU template and uploaded to Eoan. ** Description changed: + [Impact] + + * lsblk no longer prints a partition's parent +kernel device name (the wholedisk). +(i.e., 'lsblk -no PKNAME /dev/partition') + + * Another

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1862846] Re: Crash and failure installing focal

2020-02-20 Thread Mauricio Faria de Oliveira
** Tags added: sts-sponsor-mfo -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to util-linux in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1862846 Title: Crash and failure installing focal Status in subiquity: New Status in

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1862846] Re: Crash and failure installing focal

2020-02-20 Thread Mauricio Faria de Oliveira
** Patch added: "lp1862846_focal_util-linux.debdiff" https://bugs.launchpad.net/subiquity/+bug/1862846/+attachment/5329790/+files/lp1862846_focal_util-linux.debdiff -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1862846] Re: Crash and failure installing focal

2020-02-20 Thread Mauricio Faria de Oliveira
@ltrager, Indeed, I see the refactor in curtin. :) Absolutely agree w/ you, it's a regression in util-linux, and after following up with you on IRC yesterday that it is OK for me to submit the fix to Ubuntu, I worked on it. I've tested the patch today, and it's currently building on all

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1862846] Re: Crash and failure installing focal

2020-02-20 Thread Mauricio Faria de Oliveira
util-linux / test steps === Bionic --- No regression: parent kernel device name $ dpkg -s util-linux | grep ^Version: Version: 2.31.1-0.4ubuntu3.5 $ lsblk -no pkname /dev/vda1 vda Eoan --- Before: empty string $ dpkg -s util-linux | grep ^Version: Version: 2.34-0.1ubuntu2.2 $ lsblk -no

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1862846] Re: Crash and failure installing focal

2020-02-20 Thread Mauricio Faria de Oliveira
Importance: Undecided => Medium ** Changed in: util-linux (Ubuntu Eoan) Assignee: (unassigned) => Mauricio Faria de Oliveira (mfo) ** Changed in: util-linux (Ubuntu Focal) Status: New => In Progress ** Changed in: util-linux (Ubuntu Focal) Importance: Undecided => Me

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1863396] Re: Unable to mkfs.ext4 a 64T Drobo 5DS consumer raid device. Formatted easily on MX Linux.

2020-02-17 Thread Mauricio Faria de Oliveira
Hi Brett, It seems this bug should be targeted to the 'e2fsprogs' package instead of 'util-linux' as the problem happens with 'mkfs.ext4' command? $ dpkg -S $(which mkfs.ext4) e2fsprogs: /sbin/mkfs.ext4 Please provide the output of the mkfs.ext4 command you're running with the additional '-v'

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1863396] Re: Unable to mkfs.ext4 a 64T Drobo 5DS consumer raid device. Formatted easily on MX Linux.

2020-02-17 Thread Mauricio Faria de Oliveira
And after you plug the unrecognized standard USB external drives, can you please collect and upload a sosreport file? (the tool tells you the filename it generates.) $ sudo sosreport --all-logs --batch --case-id 1863396 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1862846] Re: Crash and failure installing focal

2020-02-14 Thread Mauricio Faria de Oliveira
@ltrager I'd be happy to handle the patch for util-linux on Ubuntu E/F if that helps; just let me know. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to util-linux in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1862846 Title:

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1863189] Re: package libuuid1:amd64 2.34-0.1ubuntu2.2 failed to install/upgrade: O pacote está num mau estado de inconsistência; deve reinstala-lo antes de tentar configura-lo.

2020-02-14 Thread Mauricio Faria de Oliveira
** Changed in: util-linux (Ubuntu) Status: New => Incomplete -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to util-linux in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1863189 Title: package libuuid1:amd64

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1863189] Re: package libuuid1:amd64 2.34-0.1ubuntu2.2 failed to install/upgrade: O pacote está num mau estado de inconsistência; deve reinstala-lo antes de tentar configura-lo.

2020-02-14 Thread Mauricio Faria de Oliveira
(falo português, se ajudar.) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to util-linux in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1863189 Title: package libuuid1:amd64 2.34-0.1ubuntu2.2 failed to install/upgrade: O

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1863189] Re: package libuuid1:amd64 2.34-0.1ubuntu2.2 failed to install/upgrade: O pacote está num mau estado de inconsistência; deve reinstala-lo antes de tentar configura-lo.

2020-02-14 Thread Mauricio Faria de Oliveira
And if that works, please run sudo apt install -f to try to fix up packages (libblkid1 reported). -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to util-linux in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1863189 Title: package

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1863189] Re: package libuuid1:amd64 2.34-0.1ubuntu2.2 failed to install/upgrade: O pacote está num mau estado de inconsistência; deve reinstala-lo antes de tentar configura-lo.

2020-02-14 Thread Mauricio Faria de Oliveira
Can you try sudo apt update again? It looks like a temporary issue in mirrors. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to util-linux in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1863189 Title: package libuuid1:amd64

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1858802] Re: libblkid: no bcache UUID due to ambivalent detection of bcache and xfs_external_log for regular xfs in bcache backing device

2020-01-28 Thread Mauricio Faria de Oliveira
bionic: - lxcfs/3.0.3-0ubuntu1~18.04.1 (s390x) - 3.0.3-0ubuntu1~18.04.1 util-linux/2.31.1-0.4ubuntu3.5 2020-01-28 11:07:15 UTC 0h 02m 02s mfo pass - gnocchi/4.2.5-0ubuntu1 (armhf) - (same failure in -updates too, not a regression introduced in -proposed) -

  1   2   3   >