[Touch-packages] [Bug 1995157] Re: Permission Denied while using lates verions of Openssh client

2022-11-01 Thread Robie Basak
Thank you for taking the time to file this report and helping to make Ubuntu better. I think you're probably affected by this: https://askubuntu.com/questions/1409105/ubuntu-22-04-ssh-the-rsa-key- isnt-working-since-upgrading-from-20-04 Since it seems likely to me that this is a local

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1992454] Re: iptables: segfault when renaming a chain

2022-10-11 Thread Robie Basak
Thank you for contributing this fix! This looks fine; just one comment. Upstream adds a test. But it looks to me like it won't run because the quilt patch can't handle the executable bit. Looks like there's a workaround in debian/tests/control for another case of the same issue. Please could you

Re: [Touch-packages] [Bug 1991592] Re: openssh-server should ship a systemd generator to generate ssh socket port configuration from sshd_config

2022-10-06 Thread Robie Basak
On Thu, Oct 06, 2022 at 02:34:40PM -, Corey Reichle wrote: > > Socket activation provides a smoother (runtime) UX for users > > SSHD configuration is not a user issue, but a systems administration > issue. Maybe, but more important is the UX for users of ssh clients who aren't trying to

Re: [Touch-packages] [Bug 1991592] Re: openssh-server should ship a systemd generator to generate ssh socket port configuration from sshd_config

2022-10-06 Thread Robie Basak
On Thu, Oct 06, 2022 at 01:04:05PM -, Corey Reichle wrote: > If the point is to increase density, then sshd should just be off, and > not automatically started, unless it's required for work. Socket activation provides a smoother (runtime) UX for users, and is well established as a mechanism

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1991592] Re: openssh-server should ship a systemd generator to generate ssh socket port configuration from sshd_config

2022-10-06 Thread Robie Basak
I'm not sure about this. What's the pattern that users can expect to see across all packages that provide socket activated services in Ubuntu in the future? I think there are three options here: "always", "sometimes" and "never". We could ensure that there's _always_ a generator that creates the

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1991592] Re: openssh-server should ship a systemd generator to generate ssh socket port configuration from sshd_config

2022-10-06 Thread Robie Basak
** Tags added: ssh-socket-activation -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to openssh in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1991592 Title: openssh-server should ship a systemd generator to generate ssh socket

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1990863] Re: conversion from sshd service to socket is too bumpy

2022-09-29 Thread Robie Basak
** Tags added: ssh-socket-activation -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to openssh in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1990863 Title: conversion from sshd service to socket is too bumpy Status in openssh

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1991199] Re: sshd port migration is missing two config lines from jammy to kinetic

2022-09-29 Thread Robie Basak
** Tags added: socket-activation ssh ** Tags removed: socket-activation ssh ** Tags added: ssh-socket-activation -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to systemd in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1991199

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1991283] [NEW] "sshd -i" breaks due to socket activation

2022-09-29 Thread Robie Basak
Public bug reported: On Jammy and earlier, simply running "sshd -i" worked. Now, it fails silently, and running it with "-d" gives me: Missing privilege separation directory: /run/sshd This directory is normally created with "RuntimeDirectory=sshd" as defined in

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1990586] Re: 22.04: python3* mismatched phasing breaks dist-upgrades

2022-09-28 Thread Robie Basak
In terms of risk, touching apt is always going to be high risk because users need apt to revert or upgrade away from any regression. QA is therefore essential. Normally I'd like this to "bake" in the development release first, but given the nature of the bug, that's probably not going to give us

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1990586] Please test proposed package

2022-09-28 Thread Robie Basak
Hello Jeremy, or anyone else affected, Accepted apt into jammy-proposed. The package will build now and be available at https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/apt/2.4.8 in a few hours, and then in the -proposed repository. Please help us by testing this new package. See

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1990684] Please test proposed package

2022-09-28 Thread Robie Basak
Hello elatllat, or anyone else affected, Accepted apt into jammy-proposed. The package will build now and be available at https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/apt/2.4.8 in a few hours, and then in the -proposed repository. Please help us by testing this new package. See

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1990684] Re: grub-efi-arm64-signed : Depends: grub-efi-arm64 (= 2.06-2ubuntu7) but 2.06-2ubuntu10 is to be installed

2022-09-28 Thread Robie Basak
In terms of risk, touching apt is always going to be high risk because users need apt to revert or upgrade away from any regression. QA is therefore essential. Normally I'd like this to "bake" in the development release first, but given the nature of the bug, that's probably not going to give us

Re: [Touch-packages] [Bug 1990863] Re: conversion from sshd service to socket is too bumpy

2022-09-28 Thread Robie Basak
On Wed, Sep 28, 2022 at 01:19:35PM -, Jonathan Kamens wrote: > 1) Nobody reads the release notes. That's where we document edge case issues that can't be handled automatically. Maybe we can handle this automatically, which is why I invited Steve to take a look. But if it turns out that we

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1990863] Re: conversion from sshd service to socket is too bumpy

2022-09-28 Thread Robie Basak
Thank you for taking the time to report this bug and helping to make Ubuntu better. Feedback on this is appreciated as we do want to make the transition as smooth as possible. I would warn though that just overwriting configuration files with "known good" ones following a release upgrade, as

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1969901] Re: network-manager fails to renew ipv6 address

2022-09-21 Thread Robie Basak
The test plan looks good - thanks! On reviewing the patch itself, it looks quite complex. We took a look upstream to see if there were any further fixes on the commit being cherry-picked, and found at least one. See

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1988819] Re: When apt keeps back packages due to phased updates, it should say so

2022-09-20 Thread Robie Basak
> We can't really store reasons for why something is kept back. How about: When something is scored down because it is not phased, make a note. When the scoring is all done, take the list of held back packages, and identify all those that have a note against them. Then print (up to) two lists:

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1983618] Re: New upstream microrelease 2.5.13

2022-09-20 Thread Robie Basak
** Changed in: openldap (Ubuntu) Status: Invalid => Triaged -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to openldap in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1983618 Title: New upstream microrelease 2.5.13 Status

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1871465] Re: ssh_config(5) contains outdated information

2022-09-14 Thread Robie Basak
Hello iBug, or anyone else affected, Accepted openssh into focal-proposed. The package will build now and be available at https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/openssh/1:8.2p1-4ubuntu0.6 in a few hours, and then in the -proposed repository. Please help us by testing this new package. See

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1964506] Re: Ping: checks payloads incorrectly, ignores all mismatch replies

2022-09-14 Thread Robie Basak
I'm not doubting that the revert was correct for upstream. But we have a different context in a stable release, where users may be relying on behaviours that upstream are at liberty to change in their main development branch, but we are not in our stable releases. Further, we can't just assume

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1958055] Re: sudo apport-kde is in a different design (stripped XDG_CURRENT_DESKTOP)

2022-09-14 Thread Robie Basak
Hello Kangarooo, or anyone else affected, Accepted sudo into jammy-proposed. The package will build now and be available at https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/sudo/1.9.9-1ubuntu2.1 in a few hours, and then in the -proposed repository. Please help us by testing this new package. See

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1964506] Re: Ping: checks payloads incorrectly, ignores all mismatch replies

2022-09-14 Thread Robie Basak
This is definitely a bug that we want to fix in Focal. But is this particular code change the correct way to do it? Won't reverting this commit regress the fix that was introduced by the commit in the first place? I think this needs a proper analysis of the possible implications for unaffected

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1535768] Re: pkexec tty hijacking via TIOCSTI ioctl

2022-09-07 Thread Robie Basak
** Information type changed from Public to Public Security -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to policykit-1 in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1535768 Title: pkexec tty hijacking via TIOCSTI ioctl

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1979639] Re: Apps expecting an OpenSSL 1.1 -formatted openssl.cnf fail

2022-09-05 Thread Robie Basak
That's a good question. I think it's up to Simon and the Foundations team what they want to do there. There is far less of a risk to users either way in Kinetic, because it hasn't been released yet. So I have no preference for Kinetic, though it does make sense to revert to me. -- You received

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1979639] Proposed package upload rejected

2022-09-03 Thread Robie Basak
An upload of openssl to jammy-proposed has been rejected from the upload queue for the following reason: "See discussion in LP: #1979639". -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to openssl in Ubuntu.

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1979639] Re: Apps expecting an OpenSSL 1.1 -formatted openssl.cnf fail

2022-09-03 Thread Robie Basak
Thanks everyone for the discussion. As there have been no further comments, I think it's appropriate to make a decision. I'll reject the openssl upload from Jammy, and mark that task Won't Fix. We won't update the default configuration in Jammy. Third parties who ship software intended for Jammy

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1981807] Re: qt5-network openssl3 armhf does not support tls1.3

2022-09-01 Thread Robie Basak
In #ubuntu-security just now: 14:44 sarnold: please could we have a definitive nack if you don't want bug 1981807 in the security pocket? Looking at the previous IRC conversation, it looks like it was a "decision pending review". -- You received this bug notification because you are a member

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1958055] Re: sudo apport-kde is in a different design (stripped XDG_CURRENT_DESKTOP)

2022-09-01 Thread Robie Basak
Is there any possibility that passing through this environment variable when we previously did not will change behaviour in such a way that a user treats that as a regression? For example, if some user has a setting that causes some app to now break, when it didn't before? Your upload changes the

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1958055] Proposed package upload rejected

2022-09-01 Thread Robie Basak
An upload of sudo to jammy-proposed has been rejected from the upload queue for the following reason: "The mode of debian/source_sudo.py is changed but this is not explained in the changelog or SRU information". -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1937110] Re: dhcp option 121 & 249

2022-09-01 Thread Robie Basak
Progress to fix this in Jammy is still blocked on a test plan. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to isc-dhcp in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1937110 Title: dhcp option 121 & 249 Status in subiquity:

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1983618] Update Released

2022-08-31 Thread Robie Basak
The verification of the Stable Release Update for openldap has completed successfully and the package is now being released to -updates. Subsequently, the Ubuntu Stable Release Updates Team is being unsubscribed and will not receive messages about this bug report. In the event that you encounter

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1912256] Re: Missing channel binding prevents authentication to ActiveDirectory

2022-08-31 Thread Robie Basak
** Changed in: cyrus-sasl2 (Ubuntu Jammy) Assignee: Andreas Hasenack (ahasenack) => (unassigned) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to openldap in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1912256 Title:

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1986984] Re: [FFe] tzdata 2022c update

2022-08-31 Thread Robie Basak
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/StableReleaseUpdates#tzdata says "Uploads should also be made to any releases supported via ESM". I see a bug task but nothing in the queue. What are your plans on this, please? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1986984] Re: [FFe] tzdata 2022c update

2022-08-31 Thread Robie Basak
Hello Jason, or anyone else affected, Accepted tzdata into jammy-proposed. The package will build now and be available at https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/tzdata/2022c-0ubuntu0.22.04.0 in a few hours, and then in the -proposed repository. Please help us by testing this new package. See

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1986984] Please test proposed package

2022-08-31 Thread Robie Basak
Hello Jason, or anyone else affected, Accepted tzdata into bionic-proposed. The package will build now and be available at https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/tzdata/2022c-0ubuntu0.18.04.0 in a few hours, and then in the -proposed repository. Please help us by testing this new package. See

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1986984] Please test proposed package

2022-08-31 Thread Robie Basak
Hello Jason, or anyone else affected, Accepted tzdata into focal-proposed. The package will build now and be available at https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/tzdata/2022c-0ubuntu0.20.04.0 in a few hours, and then in the -proposed repository. Please help us by testing this new package. See

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1897932] Re: systemd-repart not packaged

2022-08-17 Thread Robie Basak
There's further discussion in the ubuntu-devel ML thread. In addition to that though, I notice that mkosi in Jammy does refer to /usr/bin/systemd-repart. Will the Jammy packaged mkosi therefore change behaviour if you start shipping it in Ubuntu? -- You received this bug notification because

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1871465] Re: ssh_config(5) contains outdated information

2022-08-17 Thread Robie Basak
> Fixing this is nice for the users, but OTOH very low severity and would cause a package download and update on almost every Ubuntu in the world. Therefore we will mark this as block-proposed and keep it in focal-proposed so that a later real update (security or functional) will pick this up from

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1986660] Re: Phased update configuration flags not documented in apt.conf(5)

2022-08-16 Thread Robie Basak
Looking at apt.conf(5), it does read as if it's the definitive reference, too, and the examples file is just an example. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to apt in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1986660

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1986660] Re: Phased update configuration flags not documented in apt.conf(5)

2022-08-16 Thread Robie Basak
That's not really discoverable as a reference though. I wouldn't expect "examples" to contain a definitive reference, and nor a Discourse post about a feature that as far as I know isn't pointed to from any definitive documentation. Same with apt_preferences - I do expect to find information about

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1986660] [NEW] Phased update configuration flags not documented in apt.conf(5)

2022-08-16 Thread Robie Basak
Public bug reported: Hi, https://discourse.ubuntu.com/t/phased-updates-in-apt-in-21-04/20345 describes Dir::Etc::machine-id, APT::Get::Always-Include-Phased-Updates and APT::Get::Never-Include-Phased-Updates. I expected these to be documented in apt.conf(5) which I treat as a definitive

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1703821] Re: Dovecot and Apparmor complains at operation file_inherit

2022-08-10 Thread Robie Basak
OK, rejecting from Bionic then and setting Won't Fix. This can be reconsidered if something new comes up. ** Changed in: apparmor (Ubuntu Bionic) Status: Incomplete => Won't Fix -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1703821] Re: Dovecot and Apparmor complains at operation file_inherit

2022-08-03 Thread Robie Basak
Bug 1979879 is similar to this, except for samba in Jammy. In both cases, a workaround is trivially available since a user can safely modify the profile directly in /etc. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1703821] Re: Dovecot and Apparmor complains at operation file_inherit

2022-08-03 Thread Robie Basak
Please also fix the bug status for the Ubuntu development release apparmor package task. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to apparmor in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1703821 Title: Dovecot and

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1979879] Re: Apparmor profile in 22.04 jammy - fails to start when printing enabled

2022-08-03 Thread Robie Basak
>From an SRU perspective bug 1703821 is similar to this, except for dovecot in Bionic. In both cases, a workaround is trivially available since a user can safely modify the profile directly in /etc. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages,

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1703821] Re: Dovecot and Apparmor complains at operation file_inherit

2022-08-03 Thread Robie Basak
What's the user impact here please? Just noisy logs, or are users impacted in a more meaningful way? The downside here is that a rebuild of apparmor is going to result in virtually every Ubuntu Bionic user having to download and install an update. The vast majority of whom aren't using dovecot, or

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1979639] Re: Apps expecting an OpenSSL 1.1 -formatted openssl.cnf fail

2022-07-26 Thread Robie Basak
> ...it has basically no impact on our own applications... Just because you and I can't find a case that would break doesn't mean there isn't one. So there's risk. And I think the consequences, because of the nature of this package, could be quite large. > I'm not particularly keen on doing this

Re: [Touch-packages] [Bug 1979639] Re: Apps expecting an OpenSSL 1.1 -formatted openssl.cnf fail

2022-07-14 Thread Robie Basak
On Thu, Jul 14, 2022 at 03:56:04PM -, David Zuelke wrote: > So I think a big class of programs to consider that are affected by this > potentially are those that use a statically linked OpenSSL v1, not just > Node.js or any leftover programs that dynamically link against > libssl1.1. > > And

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1979639] Re: Apps expecting an OpenSSL 1.1 -formatted openssl.cnf fail

2022-07-13 Thread Robie Basak
Thank you for working on this! The proposed SRU carries quite a bit of regression risk I think, since there are many packages both in and out of the archive that may parse this file under various different circumstances. A regression that leads to a TLS failure, possibly across multiple packages

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1979639] Re: openssl 3.0.3-7 needs port from sid to jammy

2022-07-13 Thread Robie Basak
> openssl 3.0.3-7 needs port from sid to jammy This is presuming the solution, rather than describing the problem, so I'll amend this. ** Summary changed: - openssl 3.0.3-7 needs port from sid to jammy + Apps expecting an OpenSSL 1.1 -formatted openssl.cnf fail -- You received this bug

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1978093] Re: openssl: FTBFS due to expired certificates

2022-06-15 Thread Robie Basak
Accepting this into Bionic blocked on bug 1940141, and it's further noted there that there's an openssl security update expected on 21 June, so it's probably best to rebase on that when it arrives. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages,

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1969901] Re: network-manager fails to renew ipv6 address

2022-06-15 Thread Robie Basak
Thank you for the comments. These seem like good ideas, but need details before they are actionable. I think this update is still blocked on having a specific, step-by-step test plan please. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1974223] Re: FTBFS and autopkgtest failure since changes in apt for automatic kernel removal

2022-06-15 Thread Robie Basak
What's the current status of this please? Julian's last comment suggests that there's a problem? I see an upload in the queue for Bionic, but not for Focal. What's the status in Focal? Is this something that can be staged in proposed, or do you need it in the updates pockets, and if so, why?

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1969901] Re: network-manager fails to renew ipv6 address

2022-06-01 Thread Robie Basak
> The exact conditions for reproducing this bug on mixed IPv4/IPv6 networks are not known Looking at the upstream commit description, isn't it just that a DHCPv6 lease expires and the server NAKs a request for the same IP again? Or is that not sufficient to trigger the problem. In any case, I

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1969460] Re: software-properties-gtk crashed with TypeError in on_driver_selection_changed(): Expected a string or a pair of strings

2022-06-01 Thread Robie Basak
Hello Shih-Yuan, or anyone else affected, Accepted software-properties into jammy-proposed. The package will build now and be available at https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/software- properties/0.99.22.2 in a few hours, and then in the -proposed repository. Please help us by testing this new

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1834250] Re: update-grub complains about non-existent drives (due to cardreader)

2022-06-01 Thread Robie Basak
Hello Scott, or anyone else affected, Accepted lvm2 into focal-proposed. The package will build now and be available at https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/lvm2/2.03.07-1ubuntu1.1 in a few hours, and then in the -proposed repository. Please help us by testing this new package. See

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1973733] Proposed package upload rejected

2022-06-01 Thread Robie Basak
An upload of cups to focal-proposed has been rejected from the upload queue for the following reason: "As requested in https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/cups/+bug/1973733/comments/4;. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1962453] Please test proposed package

2022-05-27 Thread Robie Basak
Hello Utkarsh, or anyone else affected, Accepted keyutils into focal-proposed. The package will build now and be available at https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/keyutils/1.6-6ubuntu1.1 in a few hours, and then in the -proposed repository. Please help us by testing this new package. See

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1962453] Re: Apply default TTL to records obtained from getaddrinfo()

2022-05-27 Thread Robie Basak
Hello Utkarsh, or anyone else affected, Accepted keyutils into impish-proposed. The package will build now and be available at https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/keyutils/1.6.1-2ubuntu2.1 in a few hours, and then in the -proposed repository. Please help us by testing this new package. See

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1802483] Please test proposed package

2022-05-25 Thread Robie Basak
Hello Marco, or anyone else affected, Accepted libnotify into bionic-proposed. The package will build now and be available at https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libnotify/0.7.7-3ubuntu0.18.04.1 in a few hours, and then in the -proposed repository. Please help us by testing this new package.

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1802483] Re: Notifications emitted by a snap with local files or desktop files use wrong namespace

2022-05-25 Thread Robie Basak
Sorry I missed your reply, but to make progress I just tweaked the version string in a new upload that I signed. It's otherwise identical. So I'll just accept that. ** Changed in: libnotify (Ubuntu Bionic) Status: In Progress => Fix Committed ** Tags added: verification-needed-bionic --

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1802483] Re: Notifications emitted by a snap with local files or desktop files use wrong namespace

2022-05-25 Thread Robie Basak
Apart from that the Bionic upload looks fine. I note that notification- Handle-snap-applications.patch is added over the SRU for Focal, but that makes sense as that functionality is required for the other patches. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1802483] Re: Notifications emitted by a snap with local files or desktop files use wrong namespace

2022-05-25 Thread Robie Basak
+libnotify (0.7.7-3ubuntu0.20.04.1) bionic; urgency=medium Shouldn't this be ...0.18.04.1? The version number used will work, but is confusing. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to libnotify in Ubuntu.

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1973733] Re: no change rebuild to get security update out on riscv64

2022-05-18 Thread Robie Basak
Ah - is it that the same version is now built and published in Groovy and we can't safely copy the binary backwards? If so, then my second question of why this isn't going in via focal-security still stands. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1940141] Please test proposed package

2022-05-18 Thread Robie Basak
Hello Nicolas, or anyone else affected, Accepted openssl into bionic-proposed. The package will build now and be available at https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/openssl/1.1.1-1ubuntu2.1~18.04.18 in a few hours, and then in the -proposed repository. Please help us by testing this new package.

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1940141] Re: OpenSSL servers can send a non-empty status_request in a CertificateRequest

2022-05-18 Thread Robie Basak
Thank you to all involved in the discussion and analysis for carefully considering the regression risk there. Regardless of the final decision, I think the thoughtful consideration makes this an exemplary SRU. I confirmed that the new upload is simply a straightforward review on top of the

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1973733] Re: no change rebuild to get security update out on riscv64

2022-05-18 Thread Robie Basak
I'm not sure I follow. I see a retry button for the failed riscv64 build. Can't we just hit that? If there's some reason that won't work, then why is this not going through the security sponsorship queue? If we do it as an SRU, then it'll hit focal-updates only, and focal-security will be left

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1971932] Re: error in rsync protocol data stream

2022-05-12 Thread Robie Basak
This reminds me of bug 1384503, and a search reveals some other bugs that may be related too. Perhaps it's a recurrence of the same underlying issue? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to rsync in Ubuntu.

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1892825] Re: update-locale not perform correctly sanity checks

2022-05-11 Thread Robie Basak
Hello bs, or anyone else affected, Accepted glibc into bionic-proposed. The package will build now and be available at https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/glibc/2.27-3ubuntu1.6 in a few hours, and then in the -proposed repository. Please help us by testing this new package. See

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1947099] Please test proposed package

2022-05-11 Thread Robie Basak
Hello Khaled, or anyone else affected, Accepted klibc into bionic-proposed. The package will build now and be available at https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/klibc/2.0.4-9ubuntu2.2 in a few hours, and then in the -proposed repository. Please help us by testing this new package. See

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1947099] Re: ipconfig does not honour user-requested timeouts in some cases

2022-05-11 Thread Robie Basak
It's not clear to me if upstream have accepted the patch. If not, https://lists.zytor.com/archives/klibc/2021-December/004635.html sounds like it's a deliberate upstream design decision not to. In Ubuntu, we might decide to maintain the patch as a delta but then drop that delta in subsequent

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1970068] Re: L2TP+IPSec not working after upgrade to 22.04 LTS

2022-04-27 Thread Robie Basak
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 1951832 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1951832 ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 1951832 xl2tpd "Can not find tunnel" in jammy -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1958720] Re: python3-yaml and python3-six are not co-installable with python-is-python2 in jammy

2022-04-16 Thread Robie Basak
I verified that this is fixed when upgrading from Focal to Jammy. Method: lxc launch ubuntu:focal test lxc exec test bash apt -y update && apt -y full-upgrade apt -y install python-is-python2 do-release-upgrade -d do-release-upgrade does suggest removing python-is-python2 as obsolete after the

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1958720] Re: python3-yaml and python3-six are not co-installable with python-is-python2 in jammy

2022-04-13 Thread Robie Basak
Uploaded fixes for pyyaml and six. Now awaiting release team approval. I'll set Fix Committed; this can always be undone if they refuse. ** Changed in: six (Ubuntu) Assignee: (unassigned) => Robie Basak (racb) ** Changed in: pyyaml (Ubuntu) Status: Incomplete => Fix Com

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1958720] Re: python3-yaml and python3-six are not co-installable with python-is-python2 in jammy

2022-04-13 Thread Robie Basak
FTR, tumbleweed reviewed the change in principle for me in #ubuntu- devel. Thank you! -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to six in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1958720 Title: python3-yaml and

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1958720] Re: python3-yaml and python3-six are not co-installable with python-is-python2 in jammy

2022-04-13 Thread Robie Basak
I did some research to ensure that removing the Breaks is safe. Some of this repeats what we covered already but I'm stating it again so my logic is self-contained here. If python-is-python2 is installed on Focal and I upgrade to Jammy, then python-is-python2 gets removed because of the Breaks.

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1962453] Update Released

2022-04-06 Thread Robie Basak
The verification of the Stable Release Update for keyutils has completed successfully and the package is now being released to -updates. Subsequently, the Ubuntu Stable Release Updates Team is being unsubscribed and will not receive messages about this bug report. In the event that you encounter

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1961092] Re: Installing collectd pulls in the X.org stack

2022-04-05 Thread Robie Basak
This was originally reported against 20.04. I haven't validated that, but that report seems likely to be correct to me. It's worth considering an SRU for 20.04 too, but I'm focused elsewhere now. If someone would like to drive an SRU, then please do! Things to consider for an SRU: Are we sure

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1961092] Re: Installing collectd pulls in the X.org stack

2022-04-05 Thread Robie Basak
** Changed in: libnotify (Ubuntu) Status: In Progress => Fix Committed -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to libnotify in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1961092 Title: Installing collectd pulls in

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1961092] Re: Installing collectd pulls in the X.org stack

2022-04-05 Thread Robie Basak
FTR, Seb gave me an ack to drop the Recommends to a Suggests in #ubuntu- devel last night, so I'm going to go ahead and upload. ** Changed in: libnotify (Ubuntu) Status: Triaged => In Progress ** Changed in: libnotify (Ubuntu) Assignee: (unassigned) => Robie Basak (racb) -

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1952947] Re: ubuntu-bug -w (using xprop) doesn't work under wayland

2022-03-31 Thread Robie Basak
Hello Henning, or anyone else affected, Accepted apport into focal-proposed. The package will build now and be available at https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/apport/2.20.11-0ubuntu27.23 in a few hours, and then in the -proposed repository. Please help us by testing this new package. See

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1774788] Re: Daemon won't start at boot up (18LTS fully patched)

2022-03-30 Thread Robie Basak
** Tags added: network-online-ordering -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to rsync in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1774788 Title: Daemon won't start at boot up (18LTS fully patched) Status in rsync:

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1947099] Re: ipconfig does not honour user-requested timeouts in some cases

2022-03-30 Thread Robie Basak
Thank you for the detailed additional information. I think I understand the situation properly now, together with the need for the fix. > That means that if something is currently accepting DHCP offers after the specified timeout has expired, then that is buggy behaviour. We sometimes run into

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1952947] Re: ubuntu-bug -w (using xprop) doesn't work under wayland

2022-03-30 Thread Robie Basak
** Tags removed: verification-done-focal verification-needed ** Tags added: verification-failed verification-failed-focal -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to apport in Ubuntu.

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1952947] Re: ubuntu-bug -w (using xprop) doesn't work under wayland

2022-03-30 Thread Robie Basak
Sorry, the apport 2.20.11-0ubuntu27.22 to Focal is bad. It looks like symlinks have inadvertently been expanded. So that one needs fixing please with a replacement upload for Focal. Impish is fine, so I've released that one. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1952947] Update Released

2022-03-30 Thread Robie Basak
The verification of the Stable Release Update for apport has completed successfully and the package is now being released to -updates. Subsequently, the Ubuntu Stable Release Updates Team is being unsubscribed and will not receive messages about this bug report. In the event that you encounter a

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1955997] Re: The airplane hotkey has no function on a HP platform

2022-03-11 Thread Robie Basak
Sorry I'm having problems getting my email to them - it's stuck in moderation on the ubuntu-flavors@ ML. I have asked again to try and find who moderates it. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to systemd in Ubuntu.

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1962453] Re: Apply default TTL to records obtained from getaddrinfo()

2022-03-10 Thread Robie Basak
Hello Utkarsh, or anyone else affected, Accepted keyutils into bionic-proposed. The package will build now and be available at https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/keyutils/1.5.9-9.2ubuntu2.1 in a few hours, and then in the -proposed repository. Please help us by testing this new package. See

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1962453] Re: Apply default TTL to records obtained from getaddrinfo()

2022-03-10 Thread Robie Basak
I think we've concluded that we're not going to ship the configuration file parts in the Impish and Focal uploads, so I'll reject them from the queue now. The Bionic queue upload is ready now though. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages,

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1962453] Re: Apply default TTL to records obtained from getaddrinfo()

2022-03-02 Thread Robie Basak
> [Test plan] Please could you add to the test plan testing to ensure that the new configurable timeout actually works? There's a lot of code being added just to make this configurable, including an entirely new configuration file and extensive by-hand C parsing code. I think we should ensure

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1947099] Re: ipconfig does not honour user-requested timeouts in some cases

2022-03-02 Thread Robie Basak
** Changed in: klibc (Ubuntu Bionic) Status: In Progress => Incomplete -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to klibc in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1947099 Title: ipconfig does not honour

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1959993] Re: SRU of LXC 4.0.12 to focal (upstream bugfix release)

2022-02-25 Thread Robie Basak
At yesterday's SRU team meeting we concluded that we don't want the archive to end up going down in versions as you upgrade from Focal to Impish. IOW, we aren't granting an exception in this case. Some reasons: The time a security update is needed in the future would not be an appropriate time to

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1959993] Re: SRU of LXC 4.0.12 to focal (upstream bugfix release)

2022-02-25 Thread Robie Basak
(note that I haven't actually reviewed the upload yet) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to lxc in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1959993 Title: SRU of LXC 4.0.12 to focal (upstream bugfix release)

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1958720] Re: python3-yaml and python3-six are not co-installable with python-is-python2 in jammy

2022-02-24 Thread Robie Basak
> I don't see how that Breaks is relevant. "python" != "python-is- python2", so python3-yaml having a breaks on *python* (<< 2.7.18) doesn't have any direct impact on the python-is-python2 package. And Jammy ships python2 2.7.18-3 anyway. Sorry, I now see that python-is-python2 Provides "python".

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1958720] Re: python3-yaml and python3-six are not co-installable with python-is-python2 in jammy

2022-02-24 Thread Robie Basak
Oh, now maybe I see what you mean. If upgrading from Focal to Jammy without going through Impish, you'll have a "too-old" version of python- is-python2? Let me think about this. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1958720] Re: python3-yaml and python3-six are not co-installable with python-is-python2 in jammy

2022-02-24 Thread Robie Basak
I've investigated and I don't understand the issue. Has something changed in the archive? On a Jammy system I was able to install python2, python2.7, python3-yaml and python3-six, as well as manually install the python-is-python2 package from Impish. I didn't hit any co-installability problems.

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1528921] Update Released

2022-02-23 Thread Robie Basak
The verification of the Stable Release Update for rsync has completed successfully and the package is now being released to -updates. Subsequently, the Ubuntu Stable Release Updates Team is being unsubscribed and will not receive messages about this bug report. In the event that you encounter a

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1528921] Re: rsync hangs on select(5, [], [4], [], {60, 0}

2022-02-23 Thread Robie Basak
Focal is in freeze for the point release, but I don't see there being any practical issue with releasing to Bionic now. It seems unlikely that a user would be surprised by a regression on this issue upgrading from Bionic to Focal in the next week. -- You received this bug notification because

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1960863] Re: armv8 paca: poly1305 users see segfaults when pointer authentication in use on AWS Graviton 3 instances

2022-02-23 Thread Robie Basak
This was a perfectly researched and written up bug and patch and made SRU review easy. Thank you! -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to openssl in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1960863 Title: armv8

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1960863] Re: armv8 paca: poly1305 users see segfaults when pointer authentication in use on AWS Graviton 3 instances

2022-02-23 Thread Robie Basak
Hello Matthew, or anyone else affected, Accepted openssl into focal-proposed. The package will build now and be available at https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/openssl/1.1.1f-1ubuntu2.11 in a few hours, and then in the -proposed repository. Please help us by testing this new package. See

  1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   >