** Changed in: policykit-1 (Ubuntu)
Status: Triaged => Fix Released
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to policykit-1 in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1086783
Title:
New PolicyKit 0.106 changes
The newer versions added support for duktape and security team reviewed
and acked the corresponding MIR bug #1997417 now, moving forward we need
to address the MIR team feedback on duktape, migrate our rules to the
new format and resolve the autopkgtest issues found in the lunar cycle
**
Removing the block tag since we agreed to move forward with updating now
that there is a duketap backend
** Tags removed: version-blocked
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to policykit-1 in Ubuntu.
@Robert, I would start by getting the security team's input on using
mozjs or duktape, if it's a no go from their side then we know what are
our options.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to policykit-1 in Ubuntu.
I've made a forum post asking for feedback from users of polkit in
Ubuntu (https://discourse.ubuntu.com/t/use-of-javascript-rules-in-
polkit/13892). If you have comments please add them there instead of
this bug.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch
An update on the current state of this:
- polkit upstream currently depends on mozjs60
- mozjs60 is in main, but only for the use of GNOME Shell.
- The current polkit Debian/Ubuntu package has 61 patches in it, backporting
lots of changes from version 106 to 116.
- There are upstream requests for
** Tags added: version-blocked
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to policykit-1 in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1086783
Title:
New PolicyKit 0.106 changes configuration file format
Status in
Could policykit be updated if it was ported to mozjs45?
It would be good if we could see it updated eventually as the javascript rules
are much more flexible (one use would be restricting users to specific domains
with libvirt).
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of
mozjs hasn't gotten any security updates in _years_, so no, we're not
going to be able to support that package in main.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to policykit-1 in Ubuntu.
@mdeslaur
Hi any chance we can revisit this use case again and add mazjs185
through the MIR process for newer Ubuntu versions?
Thank you
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to policykit-1 in Ubuntu.
10 matches
Mail list logo
