[Touch-packages] [Bug 1628589] Re: Need better session management for apps

2017-04-11 Thread Ted Gould
** Changed in: ubuntu-app-launch (Ubuntu) Assignee: Ted Gould (ted) => (unassigned) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to unity8 in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1628589 Title: Need better session

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1628589] Re: Need better session management for apps

2017-03-24 Thread Michał Sawicz
No, not a duplicate - bug 1671424 is about *not* signalling the processes, but just closing the windows. This bug is about quitting the whole app at once (not all its windows in sequence) or force-quitting it for whatever reason (say, misbehaving app). With Unity8, an app is more than just the

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1628589] Re: Need better session management for apps

2017-03-23 Thread Daniel van Vugt
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 1671424 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1671424 Whoa, hold on What does SIGTERM have to do with it? Never mind. The problem described at the top here does not occur in Mir demo servers, only Unity8. Duplicate of bug 1671424. ** Tags added:

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1628589] Re: Need better session management for apps

2017-03-23 Thread Alejandro J. Cura
** Changed in: ubuntu-app-launch (Ubuntu) Assignee: (unassigned) => Ted Gould (ted) ** Changed in: ubuntu-app-launch (Ubuntu) Importance: Medium => High -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to unity8 in

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1628589] Re: Need better session management for apps

2017-03-23 Thread Michał Sawicz
This actually affects all apps, not only Libertine ones. We need UAL API to only send SIGTERM to the app (ideally only the main PID, if possible), in case it wants to pop a "Do you want to save..." dialog up. When that PID exits, we should also SIGTERM (and ultimately SIGKILL) all remaining