This breaks the Qt4 ABI and we are not going to do that.
** Changed in: qt4-x11 (Ubuntu)
Status: New = Won't Fix
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to qt4-x11 in Ubuntu.
It's an ABI break either way, so it's not something we'll do.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to qt4-x11 in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1366207
Title:
qgl.h typedefs GLdouble to float instead of
On Monday, September 08, 2014 14:40:53 you wrote:
Why this is marked as Fix Released? This is still broken.
Fixed released means fixed in the development series, not necessarily in
released versions of Ubuntu.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch
On Tuesday, September 09, 2014 05:24:32 you wrote:
Will this get a stable release update? If yes, how do I track when the
bug is fixed in Trusty?
It's my understanding that this is planned, but I'm not the one doing the
work. For trusty status, you'd see bug status changes that specifically
The verification of the Stable Release Update for apport has completed
successfully and the package has now been released to -updates.
Subsequently, the Ubuntu Stable Release Updates Team is being
unsubscribed and will not receive messages about this bug report. In
the event that you encounter a
On Friday, September 19, 2014 11:03:59 you wrote:
On Mon, Sep 15, 2014 at 02:49:40PM -, Simon Steinbeiß wrote:
As Xubuntu Project Lead and following my Xubuntu Release Team collegues,
I would like to strongly object to this FFe. It really is extremely late
in the cycle for something
On Monday, September 22, 2014 16:38:20 you wrote:
Testing it just now some problems have occured which I can't definately
say are due to the update but I haven't seem them before. Windows
stopped accepting keys when I did the dist-upgrade to the new packages.
After a reboot the Window Manager
On Tuesday, September 23, 2014 14:59:33 you wrote:
I tested today with Plasma 4 and Plasma 5 images and the problems I
found seem to be unrelated to the mesa update. I also tested on a
machine with Plasma 4 and AMD hardware and the mesa update also seemed
to go smooth. I'd still rather this
dh_python3 is in its own package now.
** Package changed: python3.4 (Ubuntu) = dh-python (Ubuntu)
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to dh-python in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1327371
Title:
package
The verification of the Stable Release Update for gtk+3.0 has completed
successfully and the package has now been released to -updates.
Subsequently, the Ubuntu Stable Release Updates Team is being
unsubscribed and will not receive messages about this bug report. In
the event that you encounter a
The verification of the Stable Release Update for net-tools has
completed successfully and the package has now been released to
-updates. Subsequently, the Ubuntu Stable Release Updates Team is being
unsubscribed and will not receive messages about this bug report. In
the event that you
The verification of the Stable Release Update for systemd has completed
successfully and the package has now been released to -updates.
Subsequently, the Ubuntu Stable Release Updates Team is being
unsubscribed and will not receive messages about this bug report. In
the event that you encounter a
On Friday, September 26, 2014 12:35:59 you wrote:
This broke autopkgtests of some packages; see bug #1374131.
Doesn't this pretty well establish there's undue risk with going forward with
10.3 this late in the cycle? Also, I don't see where the FFe was approved, so
I'm not sure why this got
Did you rebuild the reverse build-depends with the new libva and test any of
them?
Reverse-Build-Depends
=
Seems reasonable. Approved.
** Changed in: pycurl (Ubuntu)
Status: New = Triaged
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to pycurl in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1376736
Title:
[FFe] update to
We'd need the information in
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/StableReleaseUpdates#SRU_Bug_Template -
including a test case. Did you look at how cleanly the upstream patch
applies?
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to
Reading the upstream bug associated with #1381743, I wonder if it might
be related?
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to p11-kit in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1393923
Title:
postfix (2.11.0-1) does
The verification of the Stable Release Update for evolution has
completed successfully and the package has now been released to
-updates. Subsequently, the Ubuntu Stable Release Updates Team is being
unsubscribed and will not receive messages about this bug report. In
the event that you
On Saturday, August 30, 2014 11:35:13 Reinhard Tartler wrote:
On Thu, Aug 21, 2014 at 9:30 PM, Reinhard Tartler siret...@gmail.com
wrote:
On Thu, Aug 21, 2014 at 3:12 PM, Adam Conrad adcon...@ubuntu.com wrote:
As of nowish, Feature Freeze is in effect for utopic (14.10), leading
up to the
On Saturday, August 30, 2014 12:46:19 Reinhard Tartler wrote:
On Sat, Aug 30, 2014 at 12:36 PM, Scott Kitterman ubu...@kitterman.com
wrote:
On Saturday, August 30, 2014 11:35:13 Reinhard Tartler wrote:
On Thu, Aug 21, 2014 at 9:30 PM, Reinhard Tartler siret...@gmail.com
wrote:
On Thu
Raring is no longer a supported release. You'll find it at http://old-
releases.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/pool/main/libx/libxml2/.
** Changed in: libxml2 (Ubuntu)
Status: New = Invalid
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is
The verification of the Stable Release Update for rsyslog has completed
successfully and the package has now been released to -updates.
Subsequently, the Ubuntu Stable Release Updates Team is being
unsubscribed and will not receive messages about this bug report. In
the event that you encounter a
The verification of the Stable Release Update for systemd has completed
successfully and the package has now been released to -updates.
Subsequently, the Ubuntu Stable Release Updates Team is being
unsubscribed and will not receive messages about this bug report. In
the event that you encounter a
** Tags removed: verification-needed
** Tags added: verification-done
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to upstart in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1391296
Title:
14.10: NFS drives in fstab not mounted
The verification of the Stable Release Update for systemd has completed
successfully and the package has now been released to -updates.
Subsequently, the Ubuntu Stable Release Updates Team is being
unsubscribed and will not receive messages about this bug report. In
the event that you encounter a
The verification of the Stable Release Update for nfs-utils has
completed successfully and the package has now been released to
-updates. Subsequently, the Ubuntu Stable Release Updates Team is being
unsubscribed and will not receive messages about this bug report. In
the event that you
The verification of the Stable Release Update for glib2.0 has completed
successfully and the package has now been released to -updates.
Subsequently, the Ubuntu Stable Release Updates Team is being
unsubscribed and will not receive messages about this bug report. In
the event that you encounter a
The verification of the Stable Release Update for krb5 has completed
successfully and the package has now been released to -updates.
Subsequently, the Ubuntu Stable Release Updates Team is being
unsubscribed and will not receive messages about this bug report. In
the event that you encounter a
The verification of the Stable Release Update for krb5 has completed
successfully and the package has now been released to -updates.
Subsequently, the Ubuntu Stable Release Updates Team is being
unsubscribed and will not receive messages about this bug report. In
the event that you encounter a
Ack. Please go ahead.
** Changed in: apt (Ubuntu)
Status: New = Triaged
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to apt in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1431877
Title:
[FFe] Merge fixes from
gcc | 4:4.8.2-1ubuntu6 | trusty | amd64, arm64, armhf,
i386, powerpc, ppc64el
Where did version 4.8.2-19ubuntu come from? That's not the version
shipped in 12.04.
** Changed in: python2.7 (Ubuntu)
Status: New = Incomplete
--
You received this bug notification because
On Monday, March 30, 2015 05:07:44 AM you wrote:
On Mar 30, 2015, at 02:04 AM, Rob Speer wrote:
$ python3 -m venv testenv
Error: Command '['/home/rspeer/testenv/bin/python3', '-Im',
'ensurepip', '--upgrade', '--default-pip']' returned non-zero exit
status 1
This should work
Ack. Approved as long as it meets all the CI non-regression
requirements.
** Changed in: qtbase-opensource-src (Ubuntu)
Status: New = Triaged
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to qtbase-opensource-src in
Ack. Approved. It's not bug fix only (note for example the appearance
of the new haptics object, but it seems reasonable to include.
** Changed in: ubuntu-ui-toolkit (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided = Wishlist
** Changed in: ubuntu-ui-toolkit (Ubuntu)
Status: New = Triaged
--
You
OK. Approved. Steve's reasoning makes sense and it would be a waste to
not land it now and have to rework the merge later.
** Changed in: console-setup (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided = Wishlist
** Changed in: console-setup (Ubuntu)
Status: New = Triaged
--
You received this bug
Why is it better to do this now than early in W?
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to console-setup in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1426721
Title:
[FFe] merge console-setup 1.108 from Debian
Status
Patch staged in bzr for the next upload.
** Changed in: qtbase-opensource-src (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided = High
** Changed in: qtbase-opensource-src (Ubuntu)
Status: New = Fix Committed
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded
https://codereview.qt-project.org/#/c/106409/
** Package changed: quassel (Ubuntu) = qtbase-opensource-src (Ubuntu)
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to qtbase-opensource-src in
Ubuntu.
Ack. Approved.
** Changed in: click-apparmor (Ubuntu)
Status: Confirmed = Triaged
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to click-apparmor in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1425151
Title:
[FFe]
Hello Nathan, or anyone else affected,
Accepted into vivid-proposed. The package will build now and be
available in a few hours in the -proposed repository.
Please help us by testing this new package. See
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Testing/EnableProposed for documentation how to
enable and use
No. It shouldn't. Unfortunately, PEP-440 describes a versioning scheme
that is incompatible with the versioning long used in Debian and it's
derivatives such as Ubuntu. As the PEP says, The main reason to even
have a standardised version scheme in the first place is to make it
easier to do
This warning ought to be suppressed. It's of interest to developers,
not end users and in some cases wrong for Ubuntu packages anyway.
** Package changed: python-apt (Ubuntu) = python-setuptools (Ubuntu)
** Changed in: python-setuptools (Ubuntu)
Status: Invalid = New
--
You received
The verification of the Stable Release Update for policykit-1 has
completed successfully and the package has now been released to
-updates. Subsequently, the Ubuntu Stable Release Updates Team is being
unsubscribed and will not receive messages about this bug report. In
the event that you
I can't replicate this on an older release with upstart instead of
systemd.
service opendkim start
Starting OpenDKIM: opendkim: /etc/opendkim.conf:
ldap://192.0.2.1/ou=people,dc=example,dc=com?DKIMSelector?sub?(DKIMIdentity=$d):
dkimf_db_open(): Can't contact LDAP server
opendkim.
# ps -AF|grep
The verification of the Stable Release Update for isc-dhcp has completed
successfully and the package has now been released to -updates.
Subsequently, the Ubuntu Stable Release Updates Team is being
unsubscribed and will not receive messages about this bug report. In
the event that you encounter
The verification of the Stable Release Update for account-plugins has
completed successfully and the package has now been released to
-updates. Subsequently, the Ubuntu Stable Release Updates Team is being
unsubscribed and will not receive messages about this bug report. In
the event that you
The verification of the Stable Release Update for empathy has completed
successfully and the package has now been released to -updates.
Subsequently, the Ubuntu Stable Release Updates Team is being
unsubscribed and will not receive messages about this bug report. In
the event that you encounter a
I wonder if this might be similar to
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/systemd/+bug/1447807 in some way.
Perhaps you could test the package in vivid-proposed once it's built and see
if the problem is still there.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of
The verification of the Stable Release Update for libxext has completed
successfully and the package has now been released to -updates.
Subsequently, the Ubuntu Stable Release Updates Team is being
unsubscribed and will not receive messages about this bug report. In
the event that you encounter a
On Sunday, October 25, 2015 03:12:44 AM you wrote:
> Serge - your changes from comment #22 will break juju with lxc. juju
> will need to be modified to call systemctl add-wants multi-user.target
> lxc.service
If that's the case, this approach for a fix probably isn't appropriate for an
SRU.
--
The verification of the Stable Release Update for dh-python has
completed successfully and the package has now been released to
-updates. Subsequently, the Ubuntu Stable Release Updates Team is being
unsubscribed and will not receive messages about this bug report. In
the event that you
On Tuesday, January 26, 2016 06:11:48 PM you wrote:
> On Jan 26, 2016, at 05:49 PM, Scott Moser wrote:
> > mdadm Recommends -> postfix Recommends -> python
>
> Can we bump the latter down to a Suggests?
I don't think so, but the scripts are all pretty trivial. I'd just port it
and be done.
On Tuesday, January 03, 2017 12:34:12 AM you wrote:
> Any idea when the fix will appear in updates for yakkety?
We plan on an upload to Debian in the next day or two. It'll follow into
Ubuntu shortly there after. A Yakkety SRU is work for someone involved in
Ubuntu to do, so no.
--
You
** Changed in: postfix (Ubuntu)
Status: Triaged => Fix Committed
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to systemd in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1649453
Title:
systemd starts postfix before
Looks like a upower bug:
dpkg-query: warning: parsing file '/var/lib/dpkg/status' near line 36944
package 'libupower-glib3:amd64':
'Recommends' field, reference to 'upower':
'>' is obsolete, use '>=' or '>>' instead
dpkg-query: warning: parsing file '/var/lib/dpkg/status' near line 36944
** Changed in: postfix (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided => High
** Changed in: postfix (Ubuntu)
Assignee: (unassigned) => Scott Kitterman (kitterman)
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to systemd in
On Tuesday, December 20, 2016 12:21:51 AM you wrote:
> This is probably also an issue on Debian, would you be willing to file a
> bug there? Against postfix specifically.
There's no need. I'm already looking at it.
Scott K
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of
** Package changed: psycopg2 (Ubuntu) => python-defaults (Ubuntu)
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to python-defaults in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1700964
Title:
package python-psycopg2
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "/usr/bin/pycompile", line 35, in
from debpython.version import SUPPORTED, debsorted, vrepr, \
File "/usr/share/python/debpython/version.py", line 24, in
from ConfigParser import SafeConfigParser
ImportError: No module named 'ConfigParser'
**
It looks more like a debconf issue to me:
Preparing to unpack .../1-postfix_3.3.0-1_amd64.deb ...
Gtk-[1;32mMessage[0m: [34m20:19:38.211[0m: GtkDialog mapped without a
transient parent. This is discouraged.
Use of uninitialized value $ret in scalar chomp at
9 years later. Lovely. I don't even use Ubuntu anymore.
** Changed in: apport (Ubuntu)
Status: Incomplete => Won't Fix
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to apport in Ubuntu.
On Friday, March 6, 2020 2:49:21 AM EST you wrote:
> I'm so sorry this issue went unanswered for 9 years.. The backlog we've
> accrued here is truly unfortunate. We'd really like to see the situation
> improve, but with nearly 1300 open bugs, manually testing each has
> become virtually
So I looked into this a bit more and based on
http://www.postfix.org/postconf.5.html#smtp_tls_CAfile is doesn't appear
to me that the ca-certificates.crt file needs to be in the chroot at
all. What happens if you just delete the chroot copy? Looking in the
git history, I can see we used to
Not a ca-certificates issue.
** Changed in: ca-certificates (Ubuntu)
Status: Confirmed => Invalid
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to ca-certificates in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1915238
This is an unneeded leftover and the file in the chroot
(/var/spool/postfix) can be deleted.
When using smtp*_tls_CAfile, the smtp or smtpd daemon copies from
/etc/ssl/certs before entering the chroot (CApath is different), so it
doesn't need to be there. We stopped copying the file into the
I'm open to putting a fix in Debian. I haven't come up with a solution
that I'm happy with and don't currently have a lot of time to work on
this.
I think Paride Legovini's "wall-of-text" post is on the right track, but
I would really prefer to avoid asking a question about this.
Anything in
66 matches
Mail list logo
