[Touch-packages] [Bug 1522988] Re: stdout and stderr are not synced on lines

2017-01-16 Thread Mathew Hodson
** CVE removed: http://www.cve.mitre.org/cgi- bin/cvename.cgi?name=2016-1252 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to apt in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1522988 Title: stdout and stderr are not synced on

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1522988] Re: stdout and stderr are not synced on lines

2016-12-17 Thread Launchpad Bug Tracker
This bug was fixed in the package apt - 1.4~beta2 --- apt (1.4~beta2) unstable; urgency=high [ John R. Lenton ] * bash-completion: Only complete understood file paths for install (LP: #1645815) [ Julian Andres Klode ] * SECURITY UPDATE: gpgv: Check for errors when

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1522988] Re: stdout and stderr are not synced on lines

2016-11-11 Thread Sworddragon
So you have tried to reproduce this issue on a terminal and haven't seen mixed lines? For example they can look like this one: "Err:4 http://archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu zesty InReleasedn't create temporary file /tmp/apt.conf.eKCBxI for passing config to apt-key" -- You received this bug

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1522988] Re: stdout and stderr are not synced on lines

2016-11-11 Thread David Kalnischkies
And which are the "broken error messages" then, I don't see any… ? (the messages are on the longer side, which makes it look "funny" if wrapped like it is in launchpad, but I don't see what is broken about it…) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1522988] Re: stdout and stderr are not synced on lines

2016-11-03 Thread Sworddragon
If I remember correctly the broken error messages were the one from this issue ( https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/apt/+bug/1524196 ) as they appeared around the same time. ** Changed in: apt (Ubuntu) Status: Incomplete => New -- You received this bug notification because you are

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1522988] Re: stdout and stderr are not synced on lines

2016-11-03 Thread David Kalnischkies
Without an example nobody will ever know what you might mean. You might be meaning accidentally debug output – I that happened sometime ago, could be 1.1 and should be fixed in newer versions. Or perhaps you mean that you enabled debug output and expect it to be all orderly – not going to happen: