Re: [Toybox] Gmail being weird again.

2024-02-05 Thread David Seikel
On 2024-02-05 17:39:33, Mouse wrote: > > I was mostly offline over the weekend, and gmail refused pop3 this > > morning [...] > > > So I closed the tab and went to other windows, but next time I passed > > that virtual desktop I clicked "get messages" in thunderbird out of > > sheer habit... and i

Re: [Toybox] Gmail being weird again.

2024-02-05 Thread David Seikel
On 2024-02-05 12:09:28, Rob Landley wrote: > I was mostly offline over the weekend, and gmail refused pop3 this morning > with > "web login required", and the https://mail.google.com page prompted me for my > login/password (I log out when done with the thing I couldn't do without > logging > in)

Re: [Toybox] Gmail being weird again.

2024-02-05 Thread Mouse
> I was mostly offline over the weekend, and gmail refused pop3 this > morning [...] > So I closed the tab and went to other windows, but next time I passed > that virtual desktop I clicked "get messages" in thunderbird out of > sheer habit... and it worked. And I can send too. I suspect gmail i

Re: [Toybox] wc -L

2024-02-05 Thread Rob Landley
It was on my todo list because http://lists.landley.net/pipermail/toybox-landley.net/2023-November/029887.html but the patch just did a basic "length++" count of characters, which I thought was all that was necessary until I started in on the test cases... Rob On 2/5/24 11:33, enh wrote: > huh, i

[Toybox] Gmail being weird again.

2024-02-05 Thread Rob Landley
I was mostly offline over the weekend, and gmail refused pop3 this morning with "web login required", and the https://mail.google.com page prompted me for my login/password (I log out when done with the thing I couldn't do without logging in) and then it wanted to SMS me with a phone number it gues

Re: [Toybox] wc -L

2024-02-05 Thread enh via Toybox
huh, i'd never heard of this (and it's not used in any of the code i have access to), but debian shows it's used a bit: https://codesearch.debian.net/search?q=wc%5C+-L&literal=0 On Mon, Feb 5, 2024 at 9:09 AM Rob Landley wrote: > > Who was it who asked for wc -L again? Because here's what the deb

[Toybox] wc -L

2024-02-05 Thread Rob Landley
Who was it who asked for wc -L again? Because here's what the debian version is doing: $ echo a | wc -L 1 $ echo -n a | wc -L 1 $ echo -e '\ta' | wc -L 9 $ echo -e '\t\b' | wc -L 8 $ echo -e '\t\b\bx' | wc -L 9 $ echo -e '\t\b\b\b' | wc -L 8 $ echo -e 'abc\td' | wc -L 9 $ echo -e 'abc\bd' abd $ ec