Re: [tpmdd-devel] [PATCH] tpm: vtpm_proxy: Do not access host's event log

2016-11-20 Thread Stefan Berger
On 11/19/2016 01:32 PM, Jason Gunthorpe wrote: > On Thu, Nov 17, 2016 at 06:15:20PM -0500, Stefan Berger wrote: > Further, I had the impression that the error unwinding following -ENODEV has an issue related to sysfs. >>> I don't follow this comment.. >> I have encountered this

Re: [tpmdd-devel] [PATCH 2/2] tpm: Fix error code handling after tpm_bios_log_setup

2016-11-20 Thread Jarkko Sakkinen
I was able to apply the patch after manually editing the mbox file. Not nice. It'd be better to send these things with git-send-email to simplify the mgmt (like getting them into patchwork for starters) especially in a situation that is bit chaotic to begin with :-/ It's there. I'm not yet sure

Re: [tpmdd-devel] [PATCH v6 0/9] tpm: cleanup/fixes in existing event log support

2016-11-20 Thread Jarkko Sakkinen
On Sat, Nov 19, 2016 at 11:36:27AM -0700, Jason Gunthorpe wrote: > On Tue, Nov 15, 2016 at 10:54:53AM -0800, Jarkko Sakkinen wrote: > > On Tue, Nov 15, 2016 at 11:06:10AM -0700, Jason Gunthorpe wrote: > > > On Tue, Nov 15, 2016 at 09:40:12AM -0800, Jarkko Sakkinen wrote: > > > > > > > I applied

Re: [tpmdd-devel] [PATCH 2/2] tpm: Fix error code handling after tpm_bios_log_setup

2016-11-20 Thread Jarkko Sakkinen
On Sat, Nov 19, 2016 at 11:22:28AM -0700, Jason Gunthorpe wrote: > On Fri, Nov 18, 2016 at 07:52:49AM -0800, Jarkko Sakkinen wrote: > > On Thu, Nov 17, 2016 at 07:30:04PM -0500, Stefan Berger wrote: > > > tpm_bios_log_setup() may return -ENODEV in case no log was > > > found. In this case we do