On 11/19/2016 01:32 PM, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 17, 2016 at 06:15:20PM -0500, Stefan Berger wrote:
>
>>>> Further, I had the impression that the error unwinding following -ENODEV 
>>>> has
>>>> an issue related to sysfs.
>>> I don't follow this comment..
>> I have encountered this error here, which gets masked when applying the
>> previously shown patch.
> If tpm_chip_register fails vtpm must not call tpm_chip_unregister:
>
>> [   58.271017]  [<ffffffff8155bd32>] dpm_sysfs_remove+0x22/0x60
>> [   58.271017]  [<ffffffff8154e438>] device_del+0x58/0x280
>> [   58.271017]  [<ffffffffa024c020>] tpm_chip_unregister+0x40/0xb0 [tpm]
>> [   58.271017]  [<ffffffffa0292360>] vtpm_proxy_fops_release+0x40/0x60 
>> [tpm_vtpm_proxy]
> So, this is a vtpm thing I missed for 'tpm: Get rid of 
> TPM_CHIP_FLAG_REGISTERED'
>
> Does this do the trick?

Yes, it does the trick.

I tested this now with your other fix-patch applied to Jarkko's tree. I 
injected a fault by returning -EIO from tpm_read_log_acpi(), which 
otherwise would cause the crash.

Tested-by: Stefan Berger <stef...@linux.vnet.ibm.com>

>
> diff --git a/drivers/char/tpm/tpm_vtpm_proxy.c 
> b/drivers/char/tpm/tpm_vtpm_proxy.c
> index 3d6f6ca81def75..d3a41f9d65c85c 100644
> --- a/drivers/char/tpm/tpm_vtpm_proxy.c
> +++ b/drivers/char/tpm/tpm_vtpm_proxy.c
> @@ -42,6 +42,7 @@ struct proxy_dev {
>       long state;                  /* internal state */
>   #define STATE_OPENED_FLAG        BIT(0)
>   #define STATE_WAIT_RESPONSE_FLAG BIT(1)  /* waiting for emulator response */
> +#define STATE_REGISTERED_FLAG         BIT(2)
>
>       size_t req_len;              /* length of queued TPM request */
>       size_t resp_len;             /* length of queued TPM response */
> @@ -372,6 +373,7 @@ static void vtpm_proxy_work(struct work_struct *work)
>       if (rc)
>               goto err;
>
> +     proxy_dev->state |= STATE_REGISTERED_FLAG;
>       return;
>
>   err:
> @@ -516,7 +518,8 @@ static void vtpm_proxy_delete_device(struct proxy_dev 
> *proxy_dev)
>        */
>       vtpm_proxy_fops_undo_open(proxy_dev);
>
> -     tpm_chip_unregister(proxy_dev->chip);
> +     if (proxy_dev->state & STATE_REGISTERED_FLAG)
> +             tpm_chip_unregister(proxy_dev->chip);
>
>       vtpm_proxy_delete_proxy_dev(proxy_dev);
>   }
>


------------------------------------------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________
tpmdd-devel mailing list
tpmdd-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/tpmdd-devel

Reply via email to