Re: [tpmdd-devel] What does error code 38 mean?

Dear Peter, dear TPM folks, On 04/24/17 03:32, Peter Huewe wrote: >> x60t kernel: tpm tpm0: A TPM error (38) occurred continue selftest > > 38=0x26= invalid post init, which means tpm did not receive tpm_startup > command > after reset. Thank you for the quick reply. As this is during resume,

[tpmdd-devel] What does error code 38 mean?

Dear Linux folks, On resume, Linux 4.11-rc7 logs the messages below. ``` […] Apr 23 21:42:05 lenovox60t kernel: pciehp :00:1c.0:pcie004: Timeout on hotplug command 0x1038 (issued 109528 msec ago) Apr 23 21:42:05 lenovox60t kernel: tpm tpm0: A TPM error (38) occurred continue selftest Apr

Re: [tpmdd-devel] [backport v4.9] tpm_tis: use default timeout value if chip reports it as zero

Dear Greg, On 2017-04-15 22:50, Greg KH wrote: > On Sat, Apr 15, 2017 at 06:26:22PM +0300, Jarkko Sakkinen wrote: >> From: "Maciej S. Szmigiero" >> >> Since commit 1107d065fdf1 ("tpm_tis: Introduce intermediate layer for >> TPM access") Atmel 3203 TPM on ThinkPad

Re: [tpmdd-devel] [Regression Linux 4.11] TPM module not loaded anymore

Dear Robert, Thank you for your reply. On 2017-04-12 23:49, Moore, Robert wrote: >> On 2017-04-12 17:54, Moore, Robert wrote: >> > And probably the dmesg if error messages appear in there. >> >> Linux doesn’t log any messages, as the `tpm` module doesn’t load. >> Please >> find the output

Re: [tpmdd-devel] [Regression Linux 4.11] TPM module not loaded anymore

Dear Robert, Thank you for looking into this. On 2017-04-12 17:54, Moore, Robert wrote: And probably the dmesg if error messages appear in there. Linux doesn’t log any messages, as the `tpm` module doesn’t load. Please find the output of `sudo acpidump` attached. […] Kind regards,

Re: [tpmdd-devel] Regression between Linux 3.16 and 4.8/4.9 on Lenovo X60 with coreboot

Dear Jarkko, On 2017-04-07 22:13, Jarkko Sakkinen wrote: > On Thu, Apr 06, 2017 at 01:10:13PM -0600, Jason Gunthorpe wrote: >> On Thu, Apr 06, 2017 at 08:26:22PM +0200, Paul Menzel wrote: >> > >We added direct ACPI binding to the driver in addition to PNP, so if >>

Re: [tpmdd-devel] Regression between Linux 3.16 and 4.8/4.9 on Lenovo X60 with coreboot

On 2017-04-06 18:55, Jason Gunthorpe wrote: > On Thu, Apr 06, 2017 at 08:18:33AM +0200, Paul Menzel wrote: > >> Indeed, that improves the situation. I still need to pass `force=1` to >> the >> module to get `/dev/tpm0`. No idea, why it’s not in included in Linux >&g

Re: [tpmdd-devel] Regression between Linux 3.16 and 4.8/4.9 on Lenovo X60 with coreboot

Dear Jason, Thank you for your reply. On 2017-04-04 19:15, Jason Gunthorpe wrote: > On Tue, Apr 04, 2017 at 06:29:06PM +0200, Paul Menzel wrote: > >> Unfortunately, there seems to have been a regression between Linux >> 3.16 >> and 4.8 and 4.9, so that the Linux kerne