Christian Boos wrote:
> Ilias Lazaridis wrote:
> > Ilias Lazaridis wrote:
> >> I've notices that the milestone 0.11 contains many tasks:
> >>
> >> http://trac.edgewall.org/milestone/0.11
> >>
> >> Wouldn't it be preferable to split this work into a few more
> >> milestones?
> >>
> >> This could be
On 10/6/06, Christian Boos <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Eh, for now it's quite adequate, as actually we (at least I) don't know
> if they will be part of 0.12 or not, in the end. If development speed
> remains, the first items in the list would be completed quite soon, and
> there will still be ti
Ilias Lazaridis wrote:
> Ilias Lazaridis wrote:
>> I've notices that the milestone 0.11 contains many tasks:
>>
>> http://trac.edgewall.org/milestone/0.11
>>
>> Wouldn't it be preferable to split this work into a few more
>> milestones?
>>
>> This could be of benefit (in order to avoid similar del
Ilias Lazaridis wrote:
> I've notices that the milestone 0.11 contains many tasks:
>
> http://trac.edgewall.org/milestone/0.11
>
> Wouldn't it be preferable to split this work into a few more
> milestones?
>
> This could be of benefit (in order to avoid similar delays as with the
> actual 0.10 ver
Jeroen Ruigrok/asmodai wrote:
> -On [20060919 05:32], Ilias Lazaridis ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> >Personally, I get demotivated by seeing the workload listed within the
> >0.11 release.
>
> As long as the major coders can live with it, it's not a problem.
first of all: they can't, as the 0.10 r
-On [20060919 05:32], Ilias Lazaridis ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
>Personally, I get demotivated by seeing the workload listed within the
>0.11 release.
As long as the major coders can live with it, it's not a problem.
--
Jeroen Ruigrok van der Werven / asmodai
イェルーン ラウフロック ヴァン デル ウェルヴェン
http://
Noah Kantrowitz wrote:
> On Sep 18, 2006, at 11:59 PM, Ilias Lazaridis wrote:
> > May I ask you what your role is within this project / or your activity
> > related to trac?
>
> I develop a large number of plugins (most notably TicketDelete and
> WikiRename), I do a lot of support on #trac, I help
I develop a large number of plugins (most notably TicketDelete and
WikiRename), I do a lot of support on #trac, I help Alec with trac-
hacks.org. Probably a few other things that I'm not thinking of right
now too.
--Noah
On Sep 18, 2006, at 11:59 PM, Ilias Lazaridis wrote:
>
> May I ask yo
Noah Kantrowitz wrote:
> On Sep 18, 2006, at 11:31 PM, Ilias Lazaridis wrote:
> >
> > What I meant essentially was: Those are major changes, and should be
> > splitted into more milestones, in order to avoid similar delays as
> > with
> > the 0.10 version.
> >
> > Personally, I get demotivated by
I don't really think 6-12 month release cycles are a problem
personally. Having to push a release more often is just more work for
everyone involved.
--Noah
On Sep 18, 2006, at 11:31 PM, Ilias Lazaridis wrote:
[snip]
>
> What I meant essentially was: Those are major changes, and should be
>
Matt Good wrote:
> Manuzhai wrote:
> > On 9/18/06, ML Philip Instadia <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > Please tell me workflow gets higher priority. From a user's stand
> > > point that is by far the most important improvement.
> >
> > I do agree that workflow should not be moved back to 0.13. No
Manuzhai wrote:
> On 9/18/06, ML Philip Instadia <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Please tell me workflow gets higher priority. From a user's stand
> > point that is by far the most important improvement.
>
> I do agree that workflow should not be moved back to 0.13. Not only
> because it is an actu
On 9/18/06, ML Philip Instadia <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Please tell me workflow gets higher priority. From a user's stand
> point that is by far the most important improvement.
I do agree that workflow should not be moved back to 0.13. Not only
because it is an actual functional enhancement,
If you need the features from workflow, why not just use that branch?
--Noah
On Sep 18, 2006, at 3:42 PM, ML Philip Instadia wrote:
>
> Please tell me workflow gets higher priority. From a user's stand
> point that is by far the most important improvement.
>
> I too have techno-fascination and
Please tell me workflow gets higher priority. From a user's stand
point that is by far the most important improvement.
I too have techno-fascination and want the product based on the most
capable foundation. But seriously: finish the workflow and trac is
THE killer-app.
Sincerely,
Philip B
Ilias Lazaridis wrote:
> I've notices that the milestone 0.11 contains many tasks:
>
> http://trac.edgewall.org/milestone/0.11
>
> Wouldn't it be preferable to split this work into a few more
> milestones?
>
> This could be of benefit (in order to avoid similar delays as with the
> actual 0.10 ver
Noah Kantrowitz wrote:
> On Sep 15, 2006, at 8:44 PM, Ilias Lazaridis wrote:
> >
> > I've notices that the milestone 0.11 contains many tasks:
> >
> > http://trac.edgewall.org/milestone/0.11
> >
> > Wouldn't it be preferable to split this work into a few more
> > milestones?
> >
> > This could be
The development team is quite capable of scheduling things. Trac is
still very early on in its life cycle (hence the pre-1.0 status), and
I agree that there should be a push towards large improvements over
quick releases.
--Noah
On Sep 15, 2006, at 8:44 PM, Ilias Lazaridis wrote:
>
> I've
18 matches
Mail list logo
