Re: Review wanted for method for accessing Mock chroots

2024-03-13 Thread Michael Albinus
Tim Landscheidt writes: Hi Tim, >> However: I don't know Mock chroots in detail, but it looks to me like it >> is something what could live in tramp-container.el. What do you think a bout? > > It probably fits quite nicely, but due to my preference for > sticking to distribution packages, I'd

Re: Review wanted for method for accessing Mock chroots

2024-03-13 Thread Tim Landscheidt
Michael Albinus wrote: >> Is there anything blatantly wrong/not backward-compatible/ >> not foreward-compatible about it? I saved on (customizable) >> variables as it is hard to predict what other users might >> want/need to change. Any advice is appreciated. > Some few comments below. >

Re: Review wanted for method for accessing Mock chroots

2024-02-27 Thread Michael Albinus
Tim Landscheidt writes: > Hi, Hi Tim, > Is there anything blatantly wrong/not backward-compatible/ > not foreward-compatible about it? I saved on (customizable) > variables as it is hard to predict what other users might > want/need to change. Any advice is appreciated. Some few comments