I’ve run into a bit of a snag that there doesn’t appear there is an
easy answer to. I have a table that contains a foreign key that I
need to reference back to a primary key. In the transfer config, it
appears that when defining relationships it’s always the table that
contains the primary key
Alternatively, has anyone given considering to turning transfer into a
wrapper about CF9's inbuilt hibernate support to allow a migration
path?
That would be tricky, considering they work in some pretty significantly
different ways, including but not limited to configuration.
Although I
James, Thanks for bringing this up.
Hibernate is a *crazy* good product, and is miles above and beyond
Transfer's capabilities. In my opinion, the implementation in CF9 has been
done *exceedingly* well. The only detractor being that your are tied to a
single datasource (which I'm sure people
@Mark: Thanks for letting us know where you stand - it's great to hear
that Transfer won't be neglected. You've done a brilliant job in
developing such a useful product. All the best for the future!
Cheers
Matthew
On Jul 28, 7:31 am, Mark Mandel mark.man...@gmail.com wrote:
James, Thanks for
