I did some profiling of Transfer on CF9 vs CF8, and transfer was a lot
slower on CF9 in tests caused a lot of new objects to be loaded from
the DB (ie, cache exhaustion).
I suspect this is due to the fact that transfer has some custom code
for CF8, and treating is CF9 as CF7. MM confirmed this
please post results. Thank you
- Gabriel
On Sat, Feb 6, 2010 at 7:49 PM, Dave davidame...@gmail.com wrote:
I did some profiling of Transfer on CF9 vs CF8, and transfer was a lot
slower on CF9 in tests caused a lot of new objects to be loaded from
the DB (ie, cache exhaustion).
I suspect
The performance issue re: transfer treating cf9 as cf7 has been fixed
in the plugable cache branche.
Mark
Sent from my phone
On 2/7/10, Dave davidame...@gmail.com wrote:
I did some profiling of Transfer on CF9 vs CF8, and transfer was a lot
slower on CF9 in tests caused a lot of new objects
