Mostly because there are many reasons why RI would prevent a delete so
the number of checks is many and keeping them up to date might prove
mistake-prone.
Brian
On Aug 11, 4:27 pm, Mark Mandel mark.man...@gmail.com wrote:
Stupid question, why not just do a check with some sql, rather than
That's the best way of doing it.
You have to traverse your object model :)
Mark
On Thu, Aug 12, 2010 at 6:40 PM, Rawlins rob...@supporttime.com wrote:
Hello Chaps,
I've got a few instances in an application where I have a relationship
in which an entity can have many of another through a
You got it!
Mark
On Thu, Aug 12, 2010 at 1:49 PM, Göran gsreel...@gmail.com wrote:
Ah, ok. And in SVN the latest stable is 1.1 Final? The version 689 in
transfer/trunk is that one experimental?
On Aug 12, 5:43 am, Mark Mandel mark.man...@gmail.com wrote:
There is no 1.2 final... there is
Hi Göran,
While you are technically correct, the situation is a little more
complicated if you are using ColdFusion 9.
Transfer 1.1 Final does not officially support ColdFusion 9. My experience
is that most features in Transfer 1.1 Final work in ColdFusion 9.0, with
some small exceptions.
Yeah... I got held up getting married and then going on honeymoon. (Poor
excuses I know)
I need to get that release out to door!
Mark
On Fri, Aug 13, 2010 at 10:03 AM, Dennis Clark boomf...@gmail.com wrote:
P.S. Mark: didn't you say prior to your wedding that the next release will
be
Ok, I am running Transfer on OpenBD/Tomcat and got some strange error
related to the datasource when I use 64-bit Java. Switching to 32-bit Java
solves it.
2010/8/13 Dennis Clark boomf...@gmail.com
Hi Göran,
While you are technically correct, the situation is a little more
complicated if you
